sonex deposit meeting_ws_20110301
DESCRIPTION
Sonex presentation atTRANSCRIPT
The SONEX Workgroup: Providing an overview of
deposit usecase scenariosto JISCdepo projects
Pablo de Castro, Carlos III University [email protected]
Ongoing projects at JISC Deposit Call (source: JICdepo blog planet)
Deposit Projects Meeting, Birmingham, Mar 1st – DepositMO, JISCDura, RePosit
http://www.rsp.ac.uk/grow/measuring-success/
Measuring success of strategies to promote deposit
Measuring success for particular deposit strategies: much harder than getting a general pictureSpecific questions should be asked to repository managers, such as:
- was any given automated deposit strategy used for content ingest purposes?- could an approximate amount of items thus ingested be estimated as a percentage of total item input?
SONEX are…
As of Nov'09 the workgroup coordinator Pablo de Castro changed affiliation from Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) to Carlos III University Madrid, and Richard Jones (Symplectic Ltd) became a member of the group in Apr'10 replacing Jim Downing.
How it all started: Institutional Repositories Workshop (IRW’09)
The SONEX paper: deposit-related interoperability in a nutshell
http://hdl.handle.net/10016/9257
SONEX: not a coding project
SONEX: not a coding project
SONEX usecase-based interop analysis
SONEX usecase scenario I: publisher-driven deposit
OA-RJ workflow PEER workflow
SONEX usecase scenario I: publisher-driven deposit
SONEX usecase scenario II: CRIS/IR integration
(from: “KE CRIS-OAR [publication metadata] interoperability project” presentation, CRIS2010 Aalborg, Denmark, June 2-5, 2010)
SONEX usecase scenario II: CRIS/IR integration
SONEX usecase scenario II: CRIS/IR integration
SONEX usecase scenario III: Funder-mandated deposit
SONEX usecase scenario III: Funder-mandated deposit
SONEX usecase scenario IV: Deposit via personal software
(Potential) SONEX usecase scenario V: are IRs a proper target for research data & datasets?
Widening deposit use-case analysis: beyond research papers
First Task is ‘Re-thinking the Use-Case Actors’ to establish Use Case Scenarios and to pose question of relevance of Institutional Repository (see DISC-UK DataShare Project):
Research Data (then learning materials) [a first cut]1. (Individual/Group) Originator/Researcher
1. Via the PI (Award Holder)2. Where there is no PI
2. Depositor (not originator) – mediated deposit1. Where agent reports to PI2. Where agent does not
3. Institutional/Departmental4. Libraries (or other long-lasting organisations)5. Repository/Archive/Database Manager6. Publisher7. etc
Some questions on research data management
Are IRs a proper target for research data deposit?
Could Sword deal with data transfer?
Available workforce for dealing with data management: is it big enough? Trained enough?
Research data file sizes: should deposit by reference be considered instead/besides binary data transfer?
At what point along the publication lifecycle should dataset deposit take place?
SONEX current tasks
Providing support to selected projects at JISC Deposit call
Cooperating along Sword v2 definition
Gathering information on new & ongoing deposit-related projects and initiatives, http://sonexworkgroup.blogspot.com/2010/05/summary-of-ongoing-deposit-related_9901.html
Dissemination of initiative for potential intnl cooperation: OpenAIRE, DL.org
Widening deposit use-case analysis in cooperation with selected projects at JISC Deposit call: further use-case scenarios, more digital object types (beyond research papers)Analysis on research data management from JISCMRD environment
More info on Sonex: http://sonexworkgroup.blogspot.com/
Pablo de Castro, Carlos III University Madrid, [email protected]
Thank you