sony music v. cox communications

26
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division Sony Music Entertainment, et ai. Plaintiffs, V. Cox Communications, Inc., et ai. Defendants. Case No. 1; 18-cv-950-LO-IDD Hon. Liam O'Grady AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are the Parties' Cross Motions for Summary Judgment. Dkt. 312 (Pis.' Mot.), Dkt. 328 (Defs.' Mot.). In a hearing before the Court on November 26,2019, Defendants directed the Court's attention to an issue regarding the knowledge element for contributory infringement, and its treatment at summary judgment. Specifically, there is confusion regarding the treatment of musical compositions within a prima facie case for contributory liability. The Court agrees with the Parties that clarification is appropriate, and takes this opportunity to clarify its ruling. As to knowledge of musical compositions in suit. Section 1I.B.2 is replaced, and this opinion supersedes the Memorandum Opinion and Order of November 15,2019 (Dkt. 586). Fifty-three members of the recording industry ("Plaintiffs" or "Sony") bring this action for copyright infiingement. They seek relief from Cox Communications, Inc. and CoxCom, LLC ("Defendants" or "Cox") for infringement of Plaintiffs' works that allegedly occurred by unauthorized download and distribution of files using Cox's network. Plaintiffs allege both contributory infringement and vicarious liability for infnngement by Cox's internet subscribers. Specifically, Plaintiffs claim that Defendants are liable for infringement of 7,068 copyrighted Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 1 of 26 PageID# 25497

Upload: others

Post on 08-Dec-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

Sony Music Entertainment, et ai.

Plaintiffs,

V.

Cox Communications, Inc., et ai.

Defendants.

Case No. 1; 18-cv-950-LO-IDD

Hon. Liam O'Grady

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court are the Parties' Cross Motions for Summary Judgment. Dkt. 312 (Pis.'

Mot.), Dkt. 328 (Defs.' Mot.). In a hearing before the Court on November 26,2019, Defendants

directed the Court's attention to an issue regarding the knowledge element for contributory

infringement, and its treatment at summary judgment. Specifically, there is confusion regarding

the treatment of musical compositions within a prima facie case for contributory liability. The

Court agrees with the Parties that clarification is appropriate, and takes this opportunity to clarify

its ruling. As to knowledge of musical compositions in suit. Section 1I.B.2 is replaced, and this

opinion supersedes the Memorandum Opinion and Order of November 15,2019 (Dkt. 586).

Fifty-three members of the recording industry ("Plaintiffs" or "Sony") bring this action

for copyright infiingement. They seek relief from Cox Communications, Inc. and CoxCom,

LLC ("Defendants" or "Cox") for infringement of Plaintiffs' works that allegedly occurred by

unauthorized download and distribution of files using Cox's network. Plaintiffs allege both

contributory infringement and vicarious liability for infnngement by Cox's internet subscribers.

Specifically, Plaintiffs claim that Defendants are liable for infringement of 7,068 copyrighted

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 1 of 26 PageID# 25497

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 2 of 26 PageID# 25498

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 3 of 26 PageID# 25499

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 4 of 26 PageID# 25500

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 5 of 26 PageID# 25501

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 6 of 26 PageID# 25502

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 7 of 26 PageID# 25503

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 8 of 26 PageID# 25504

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 9 of 26 PageID# 25505

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 10 of 26 PageID# 25506

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 11 of 26 PageID# 25507

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 12 of 26 PageID# 25508

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 13 of 26 PageID# 25509

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 14 of 26 PageID# 25510

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 15 of 26 PageID# 25511

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 16 of 26 PageID# 25512

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 17 of 26 PageID# 25513

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 18 of 26 PageID# 25514

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 19 of 26 PageID# 25515

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 20 of 26 PageID# 25516

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 21 of 26 PageID# 25517

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 22 of 26 PageID# 25518

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 23 of 26 PageID# 25519

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 24 of 26 PageID# 25520

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 25 of 26 PageID# 25521

Case 1:18-cv-00950-LO-JFA Document 610 Filed 11/27/19 Page 26 of 26 PageID# 25522