sotc 2014 california local

8/13/2019 Sotc 2014 California Local

1/86


2/86

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Alameda County ............................................... 23Alpine County ................................................... 24Amador County ................................................ 25Bue County..................................................... 26Calaveras County .............................................. 27Colusa County ................................................... 28Contra Costa County ........................................ 29

Del Norte County .............................................. 30El Dorado County.............................................. 31Fresno County .................................................. 32Glenn County .................................................... 33Humboldt County ............................................. 34Imperial County ................................................ 35Inyo County ....................................................... 36Kern County ...................................................... 37Kings County ..................................................... 38

Lake County ...................................................... 39Lassen County ................................................... 40Los Angeles County .......................................... 41Madera County ................................................. 45M i C 46

Orange County.................................................. 55Placer County.................................................... 57Plumas County .................................................. 58Riverside County ............................................... 59Sacramento County .......................................... 61San Benito County ............................................ 62San Bernardino County .................................... 63

San Diego County ............................................. 65San Francisco County ....................................... 66San Joaquin County .......................................... 67San Luis Obispo County .................................... 68San Mateo County ............................................ 69Santa Barbara County ...................................... 70Santa Clara County ........................................... 71Santa Cruz County ............................................ 72Shasta County ................................................... 73

Sierra County .................................................... 74Siskiyou County ................................................ 75Solano County .................................................. 76Sonoma County ................................................ 77S i l C 78

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................ 3TOP TEN CALIFORNIA CITIES BY POPULATION ....................................................................................................... 5TOP OF THE CLASS ................................................................................................................................................... 6CITIES AND COUNTIES ON THE RISE ....................................................................................................................... 9CALIFORNIA TOBACCO CONTROL BY THE NUMBERS ..........................................................................................11RAISE YOUR GRADE ...............................................................................................................................................14LOCAL GRADING METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................... 16

County Grades


3/86

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The American Lung Associaon State of Tobacco Control 2014 report tracks progress on key tobaccocontrol policies at the state and federal levels. The report assigns grades to every state in four key areas:tobacco prevenon and control spending, smokefree air, cigaree tax and cessaon coverage. The gradesare based on tobacco control laws and regulaons in eect as of January 2, 2014.

While other states have taken steps forward, progress in California, which was once on the forefront oftobacco control eorts, has stagnated. Our state has made lile to no headway in increasing its tobaccoprevenon and control funding, protecng its workers from loopholes in the smokefree workplace law,raising its cigaree tax or increasing cessaon coverage. California once again received F grades for

Tobacco Prevenon and Control Program Funding and Cessaon Coverage and a D for its Cigaree Tax,which, at $0.87, ranks 33rd in the naon. While California receives an A for its Smokefree Air, our state hasfailed to close any of the loopholes that sll leave approximately 1.5 million workers at risk of exposure tosecondhand smoke in their place of employment.

In conjuncon with the naonal report, the American Lung Associaon in California releases its Stateof Tobacco Control 2014 California Local Gradesreport to track how well California cies and counesprotect their cizens from the burden of tobacco. The State of Tobacco Control 2014 California LocalGradesreport is based on a review of county and municipal codes in three key areas smokefree outdoor

air, smokefree mul-unit housing and reducing tobacco sales; and averaged for one Overall Tobacco Controlgrade. The 2014 report includes grades for every city and county in California -- all 58 counes (which coverthe unincorporated areas of the county) and all 482 of the incorporated cies and towns in the state.

While the naonal grades reect important issues that the state of California should address, thereis more that can be done locally. Millions of people in California are sll aected by tobacco, tens ofthousands of youth in California become smokers each year and untold numbers of Californians areimpacted by secondhand smoke. Leadership and soluons to these problems can come from everylevel of government. Local elected ocials can, and should, take steps to protect the residents of their

communies from tobacco and secondhand smoke by passing policies to restrict smoking in parks andother outdoor areas, require mul-unit housing buildings to be nonsmoking and prevent illegal sales oftobacco products to youth.

Th f h S f T b C l 2014 C lif i L l G d i i bli


4/86

HIGHLIGHTS OF THE REPORT

40 CITIES AND COUNTIES RAISED THEIR GRADES IN 2013In 2013, 40 municipalies adopted local ordinances in at least one of the three categories included in theState of Tobacco Control 2014 California Local Gradesreport. Elected ocials in these cies and counesdemonstrated strong leadership in adopng policies to protect their residents and improve the health of theircommunies. Policies passed in 2013 include 14 ordinances to prohibit smoking in mul-unit housing, 30ordinances to restrict smoking in outdoor areas and seven ordinances to require tobacco retailers to obtaina license to sell tobacco products. See the Cies and Counes on the Rise secon of the report (page 9) forthe full list of municipalies that passed policies in 2013.

SEVEN CITIES IMPROVED THEIR GRADE FROM AN F TO AN A IN AT LEAST ONE POLICY CATEGORYThe cies of Carmel-By-The-Sea, Carpinteria, Hillsborough, Lafayee, and Oroville improved their grade froman F to an A in at least one category. Two addional cies, Daly City and Walnut Creek, improved from an F toan A in two categories, Smokefree Outdoor Air and Smokefree Housing, resulng in overall B grades. Thesecies have demonstrated strong leadership by passing strong tobacco control ordinances.

ONE CITY IMPROVED ITS OVERALL GRADE TO AN A

Berkeley is the only city this year to be added to the list of cies and counes that receive an overall Agrade. There are now 18 communies in California that receive an Overall Tobacco Control grade of A. These

municipalies represent a diverse mix of communies in terms of income, size, and racial diversity. These 15cies and three counes have demonstrated that there is public support and polical will for strong tobaccocontrol policies in all types of communies and have set a high bar for others to follow. See the Top of theClass secon of the report (page 6) for more informaon on these cies and counes.

FOUR CITIES RAISED THEIR OVERALL GRADE TO A B

This year, four cies passed policies to raise their overall grade to B. Carpinteria, Daly City, Petaluma andWalnut Creek all passed policies that protect the cizens in their communies. Although these cies sll havethe opportunity to further improve the health of their residents, they have taken bold steps to ensure that the

laws they have implemented are as strong as possible.

NUMBER OF OVERALL FS HAS DECREASED

Since this report rst started grading local cies and counes in California four years ago, there have beenj li li h h S i ll h b f i i h ll A


5/86

TOP TEN CALIFORNIA CITIES BY POPULATION

The ten most populous cites in California account for 25 percent of the states populaon. Strong tobaccocontrol laws in these cies can make a big dierence in protecng more than a quarter of Californias residentsfrom secondhand smoke and other dangers of tobacco. In 2013, two of the most populous cies in California-- San Diego and San Francisco -- passed tobacco control policies. Both cies passed policies in the areas ofSmokefree Outdoor Air and Smokefree Housing. San Diego increased their points in those categories, but didnot increase its grade. San Francisco improved its grade in the area of Smokefree Housing. Below is a tableshowing the grades for the ten most populous cies in California.

Top Ten Cies in Californiaby Populaon

OverallTobacco

Control

SmokefreeOutdoor Air

SmokefreeHousing

Reducing

Sales ofTobacco

Products

1.Los Angeles(Populaon: 3,863,839) C D F A

2.San Diego(Populaon: 1,326,238) D D F B

3.San Jose

(Populaon: 984,299) C B D B4.San Francisco(Populaon: 825,111) B B C A

5.Fresno(Populaon: 508,453) F D F F

6.Sacramento(Populaon: 473,509) C D F A

7.Long Beach(Populaon: 467,646) C C D A8.Oakland(Populaon: 399,326) B B B A

9 B k ld


6/86

TOP OF THE CLASS

This year, there are 18 cies or counes that received an Overall Grade of A. These areas throughout Californiaare a diverse mix in many aspects, demonstrang that support for tobacco control policies exists in all types ofcommunies.

These jurisdicons are of every size and are spread geographically throughout the state. They havepopulaons as low as 18,000 (Albany) and as high as 194,000 (Glendale). Nine jurisdicons are located inthe south (Baldwin Park, Calabasas, Compton, Glendale, Hunngton Park, Pasadena, Santa Monica, SouthPasadena, and Temecula) and nine are located in the north (Albany, Berkeley, Contra Costa County, Dublin,Richmond, Marin County, Santa Clara County, San Rafael, and Union City). In addion, these cies and

counes have varying levels of income and ethnic diversity. The cies and counes range from predominantlywhite, to predominately Hispanic. The graphs below show a comparison of all 18 municipalies in the areas ofEthnicity, Lano Origin, Median Income, and Populaon.

ETHNICITY:

The graph below shows the ethnic breakdown of each of the 18 jurisdicons. Each municipality varies inits ethnic breakdown, from Union City, with a reported 50.9% Asian populaon, to Compton, with a 32.9%African American populaon. Diverse communies across the state support tobacco control policies. Forinformaon on Lano Origin, see page 7.

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


7/86

LATINO ORIGIN:

Because of the way in which the census is conducted, informaon on Lano Origin is collected seperatly from

other racial demographics. The graph below depicts the Lano Origin of the residents of cies and couneswith an A grade. These municipalies range from predominantly Lano communies, such as Hunngton Parkwith a populaon of 97.1% of Lano Origin, to communies with very low numbers of residents with LanoOrigin, such as Calabasas (6.4%). Lano Origin, much like ethnicity, varies among the highest graded cies,demonstrang support from a diverse group of constuents.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Latno Origin

Alba

ny

BaldwinPa

rk

Berkele

y

Calab

asas

Compton

Contra

Costa

County

Dublin

Glendale

Marin

County

HunngtonPa

rk

Pasadena

Richmond

SanRafael

SantaClar

aCounty

SantaM

onica

SouthPa

sadena

Temecula

UnionCity


8/86

MEDIAN INCOME:

The graph below shows the median income for the 18 municipalies with overall A grades. These jurisdicons fall

at all levels of the income scale, from wealthier communies such as Calabasas ($118,182) and Dublin ($111,481)to less auent communies such as Compton ($43,311) and Hunngton Park ($36,788). There is no correlaonbetween a communitys median income and its ability to pass and implement tobacco control policies.

$0

$20000

$40000

$60000

$80000

$100000

$120000

$140000

Median Income

Albany

Bald

winPark

Calab

asas

Berkeley

Compton

Contra

Costa

Cou

ntyDu

blin

Glen

dale

Marin

Cou

nty

Hunn

gton

Park

Pasadena

Rich

mond

SanRa

fael

SantaC

laraC

ounty

SantaM

onica

SouthPa

sadena

Temecula

Unio

nCity

POPULATION:

The graph below compares the populaon size of the 18 cies and counes that receive overall A grades. It isclear from the graph that jurisdicons with populaons of all sizes have implemented tobacco control policies.Glendale, with a populaon of 193,652, has the largest populaon of this group, while the city of Albany,

with a populaon of 18,430, has the smallest. The dierence in populaon has not aected the ability toimplement strong tobacco control policies.

Populaton


9/86

CITIES AND COUNTIES ON THE RISE

Cies and counes that have taken acon during 2013 toward raising their grades deserve specialrecognion. These 40 Cies and Counes on the Rise passed an ordinance in at least one of the threepolicy categories this past year. In most cases, their acons improved their grade, but in some, theordinance(s) only contributed to increasing the points in the parcular grade category. Either way, thesepolicies are noteworthy and deserve acknowledgement.

Below are the 2014 Cies and Counes on the Rise, which are listed along with the grade categories inwhich they passed a policy. For further details about each municipalitys grades and points, including theirOverall Tobacco Control grade, see the county report cards that begin on page 23.

Municipality Category of Policies Passed in 2013

ArcataSmokefree Outdoor Air (C to A), Smokefree Housing (increased points, grade

remains D)

Auburn Smokefree Outdoor Air (increased points, grade remains F)

Berkeley Smokefree Housing (D to A)Baldwin Park Smokefree Housing (increased points, grade remains A)

Beaumont Smokefree Outdoor Air (F to D)

Buellton Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products (F to D)

Capitola Smokefree Outdoor Air (C to A), Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products (F to D)

Carmel-by-the-Sea Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products (F to A)

Carpinteria Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products (F to A)Chico Smokefree Outdoor Air (increased points, grade remains C)

Colusa Smokefree Outdoor Air (F to D)


10/86

Municipality Category of Policies Passed in 2013

Oroville Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products (F to A)

Palo Alto Smokefree Outdoor Air (increased points, grade remains C)

Petaluma Smokefree Outdoor Air (D to A), Smokefree Housing (D to A)

Plymouth Smokefree Outdoor Air (F to D)

Sacramento County Smokefree Housing (increased points, grade remains F)

San Diego Smokefree Outdoor Air (increased points, grade remains D), SmokefreeHousing (increased points, grade remains F)

Santa Cruz Smokefree Outdoor Air (grade remains B)

San FranciscoSmokefree Outdoor Air (increased points, grade remains B), Smokefree

Housing (D to C)

San RamonSmokefree Outdoor Air (C to A), Smokefree Housing (increased points, grade

remains D), Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products (D to C)

South San Francisco Smokefree Outdoor Air (F to D), Smokefree Housing (F to D)

Susanville Smokefree Outdoor Air (increased points, grade remains D)

Tehachapi Smokefree Outdoor Air (increased points, grade remains F)

Walnut Creek Smokefree Outdoor Air (F to A), Smokefree Housing (F to A)

West Covina Smokefree Outdoor Air (increased points, grade remains F)

Whier Smokefree Outdoor Air (F to D)

Williams Smokefree Outdoor Air (F to D)


11/86

By grading every city and county in California, the State of Tobacco Control 2014 California Local Gradesreport paints a comprehensive picture of how well local elected ocials across the state protect the residentsof California. Below is a breakdown of the Overall Tobacco Control grade for every municipality, a list of thecies and counes with the top grades in each category and a list of the number of municipalies that haveadopted each of the policy provisions that are graded.

BREAKDOWN OF ALL TOBACCO CONTROL POLICIES IN CALIFORNIA

Smokefree Outdoor Air

119 cies/counes restrict smoking at outdoor dining areas 109 cies/counes restrict smoking within entryways of buildings 113 cies/counes restrict smoking at public events 326 cies/counes restrict smoking in recreaon areas 109 cies/counes restrict smoking at service areas 45 cies/counes restrict smoking on sidewalks in commercial areas 42 cies/counes restrict smoking at outdoor worksites

Smokefree Housing

34 cies/counes require the creaon of nonsmoking units in mul-unit housing 114 cies/counes restrict smoking in indoor and/or outdoor common areas of mul-unit housing 38 cies/counes require landlords to disclose informaon about the smoking policy to tenants 25 cies/counes declare that exposure to secondhand smoke is a nuisance 38 cies/counes require the creaon of nonsmoking units in Housing Authority housing

Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products 141 cies/counes require tobacco retailers to obtain a local license to sell tobacco products 31 cies/counes restrict the sale of tobacco products within a certain distance of schools/parks

3 cies/counes restrict the sale of tobacco products at pharmacies 37 cies/counes restrict the sampling of tobacco products

CALIFORNIA TOBACCO CONTROL BY THE NUMBERS


12/86

BREAKDOWN OF OVERALL TOBACCO CONTROL GRADE

A grade for Overall Tobacco Control 18 cies/counes received an A grade (Albany,Baldwin Park, Berkeley, Calabasas, Compton, Contra

Costa County, Dublin, Glendale, Hunngton Park,Marin County, Pasadena, Richmond, San Rafael,Santa Clara County, Santa Monica, South Pasadena,

Temecula, Union City) The number of overall As has almost doubled in

recent years (from 9 in 2010 to the 18 we see today).

B grade for Overall Tobacco Control 33 cies/counes received a B grade (Alameda,

Belmont, Burbank, Calexico, Campbell, Carpinteria,

Carson, Daly City, Davis, El Cajon, Fremont, Larkspur,Loma Linda, Marnez, Mill Valley, Murrieta, Novato,

Oakland, Petaluma, Pleasant Hill, Rohnert Park, SanFernando, San Francisco, San Luis Obispo, Santa

Barbara County, Santa Cruz, Sausalito, Sebastopol,

Solana Beach, Sonoma County, Temple City, WalnutCreek, Watsonville)

C grade for Overall Tobacco Control 69 cies/counes received a C grade

D grade for Overall Tobacco Control 86 cies/counes received a D grade

F grade for Overall Tobacco Control 330 cies/counes received an F grade

N/A grade for Overall Tobacco Control3 i i d / d h i h d / f f h d i

Overall Tobacco Control Grade

Breakdown Across California

61% 16%

6%

3%

12%

A

B

C

D

F


13/86

Smokefree HousingA grade for Smokefree Housing 30 cies/counes received an A grade (Alameda, Baldwin Park, Belmont, Berkeley, Calabasas, Compton,

Daly City, Dublin, Fairfax, Glendale, Hunngton Park, Larkspur, Loma Linda, Marin County, Novato,Pasadena, Petaluma, Pleasant Hill, Richmond, Rohnert Park, San Rafael, Santa Clara County, SantaMonica, Sausalito, Sebastopol, Sonoma County, South Pasadena, Tiburon, Union City, Walnut Creek)

The number of As for Smokefree Housing has more than doubled (12 in 2010 to 30 today)B grade for Smokefree Housing

7 cies/counes received a B grade (Albany, Contra Costa County, Eureka, Fremont, Marnez, Oakland,

Temecula)

Reducing Sales of Tobacco ProductsA grade for Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products

114 cies/counes received an A grade (Albany, Arroyo Grande, Baldwin Park, Banning, Beaumont,Berkeley, Beverly Hills, Burbank, Calabasas, Calexico, California City, Calimesa, Campbell, Canyon Lake,

Carmel-by-the-Sea, Carson, Carpinteria, Cerritos, Coachella, Compton, Concord, Contra Costa County,Corona, Culver City, Davis, Delano, Desert Hot Springs, Dublin, Duarte, Eastvale, El Cajon, El Monte, El

Segundo, Elk Grove, Firebaugh, Fort Bragg, Gardena, Glendale, Grass Valley, Grover Beach, Hawaiian

Gardens, Hawthorne, Hemet, Hollister, Hunngton Park, Inglewood, Jurupa Valley, Kern County, LaCanada Flintridge, Lake Elsinore, Lancaster, Lawndale, Lomita, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Los AngelesCounty, Lynwood, Malibu, Marin County, McFarland, Mendocino County, Menifee, Mill Valley, Montebello,Monterey County, Monterey Park, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Nevada City, Norco, Oakland, Oroville, Oxnard,

Pacica, Palmdale, Parlier, Pasadena, Perris, Rancho Cordova, Richmond, Riverbank, Riverside, RiversideCounty, Sacramento, Sacramento County, San Fernando, San Francisco, San Gabriel, San Jacinto, San Luis

Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, San Pablo, San Rafael, Santa Ana, Santa Barbara County, Santa ClaraCounty, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz County, Santa Monica, Sierra Madre, Solana Beach, South Pasadena,

Tehachapi, Temecula, Temple City, Ukiah, Union City, Vista, Wasco, Watsonville, West Sacramento,

Wildomar, Willits, Yolo County) The number of As for Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products has increased from 95 in 2010 to 114 todayB grade for Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products

3 cies received a B grade (Artesia, San Diego, San Jose)


14/86

RAISE YOUR GRADE

As is evidenced by the 18 cies and counes that have overall A grades, strong tobacco control policiescan work in any community. So how can your community improve its health and raise its grade? Below is aworksheet that can be used to determine what types of policies could improve the health of your city or countyand help raise its grade. Just ll in the points for the policies your community already has in the right-handcolumn and see how many more points you will need to increase your grade. No points are available for greysquares. These policies will improve the health of your communies and ensure that tobacco is kept out of thehands of children.

SMOKEFREE OUTDOOR AIR

1 Point 2 Points 3 Points 4 Points Total Points

SmokefreeDining

Allows designated smokingareas or includes excepons

100%smokefree

SmokefreeEntryways

Less than 15 feet of allentryways or within anunspecied distance

Within 15-19 feetof all entryways

20 or morefeet from allentryways

SmokefreePublic Events

Some types of public eventsbut not all

Allows designatedsmoking areas

100%smokefree

SmokefreeRecreaonAreas

Some parks, beaches andtrails

Allows designatedsmoking areas

100%smokefree

SmokefreeService Areas

Some types of service areasbut not all

All service areas

SmokefreeSidewalks(Bonus Point)

Some or all sidewalks orother pedestrian walkways

SmokefreeWorksites(Bonus Point)

Some or all outdoor

worksites

TOTAL:

18+ points = A 13-17 points = B 8-12 points = C 3-7 points = D 0-2 points = F


15/86

REDUCING SALES OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS

Policy Provisions:(1) Require tobacco retailers to pay an annual fee that suciently covers administraon and enforcement

eorts, including compliance checks;(2) Requirement that all retailers obtain a license to sell tobacco and renew it annually;(3) Provision that any violaon of a local, state or federal tobacco law is considered a violaon of the license;(4) Financial deterrent through nes and penales for violaons that includes suspension and revocaon of

the license.

1 Point 2 Points 3 Points 4 Points Total Points

Tobacco RetailerLicensing

A sucient annual fee and0 of the other 3 provisionsoutlined above or licensingordinance with insucientannual fee and any of theother 3 provisions outlinedabove

A sucient annualfee and 1 of theother 3 provisionsoutlined above

A sucient annual feeand 2 of the other 3provisions outlinedabove

A sucient annualfee and 2 of theother 3 provisionsoutlined above

Sales near

Schools andParks(Bonus Point)

Prohibit retailers nearschools and/or parks

Sales inPharmacies(Bonus Point)

Prohibit sales at somepharmacies

Samplingof TobaccoProducts(Bonus Point)

Prohibit sampling ornominal cost distribuonof tobacco products

TOTAL:

4+ points =A 3 points = B 2 points =C 1 point = D 0 points = F


16/86


17/86

Dining AreasDescripon Restricons on smoking in outdoor seang areas at restaurants and bars.

State Law Smoking is prohibited in indoor dining areas but there are no state law restricons on smoking inoutdoor dining areas.

Criteria4 All outdoor dining areas at bars and restaurants are 100% smokefree2 Smoking restricted in outdoor dining areas but designated smoking areas allowed or excepons made for

certain types of bars and/or restaurants0 No smoking restricons in outdoor dining areas

EntrywaysDescripon Restricons on smoking in places within a certain distance of doors, windows, and other openingsinto all enclosed areas where smoking is prohibited.

State Law Smoking is prohibited within 20 feet of entrances, exits, or operable windows of a public building,which includes state, county and city buildings.

Criteria

4 Smoking prohibited within 20 or more feet of entryways3 Smoking prohibited within 15-19 feet of entryways2 Smoking prohibited within some distance less than 15 feet of entryways or within an unspecied distance of

entryways0 No smoking restricons for entryways

Public Events

Descripon Smoking restricons at events open to the public such as fairs, farmers markets, parades,concerts and other similar events that take place on public property.

State Law There are no statewide restricons on smoking in outdoor public events.


18/86

Service AreasDescripon Smoking restricons in outdoor locaons where people stand or wait for services including ATMlines, public transit stops, taxi stands and cket lines.

State Law There are no statewide restricons on smoking in service areas.

Criteria4 Smoking restricted at all service areas2 Smoking restricted at some types of service areas (such as at bus stops) but not all service areas

0 No restricons on smoking in service areas

Sidewalks in Commercial AreasDescripon Smoking restricons on sidewalks and other pedestrian walkways in commercial areas, such asdowntown areas and outdoor shopping centers.

State Law There are no statewide restricons on smoking on sidewalks in commercial areas.

Criteria

1 bonus point Smoking restricted on sidewalks or other pedestrian walkways within all commercial areas orwithin a specied commercial or downtown area

WorksitesDescripon Smoking restricons in outdoor places of employment, such as construcon sites.

State Law There are no statewide restricons on smoking in outdoor worksites.

Criteria

1 bonus point Smoking restricted for some or all outdoor worksites

SMOKEFREE HOUSING

Descripon While California has been a leader on protecons from secondhand smoke, one area wherel b d i i l i h i S dh d k i l i h i


19/86

Nonsmoking UnitsDescripon Prohibing smoking within the units and on the paos and balconies of mul-unit housing units.

State Law There are no statewide restricons on smoking in units of mul-unit housing.

Criteria

4 Requirements for 75-100% of mul-unit housing units to be declared nonsmoking3 Requirements for 50-74% of mul-unit housing units to be declared nonsmoking2 Requirements for 25-49% of mul-unit housing units to be declared nonsmoking

1 Requirements for mul-unit housing units to be declared nonsmoking only in new housing0 No requirements for declaring mul-unit housing units nonsmoking or some percentage less than 25%required

Nonsmoking Common AreasDescripon Smoking restricons in both indoor common areas,which include hallways, stairwells, laundry rooms and recreaonrooms, and outdoor common areas, which include swimming pools,play areas, outdoor eang areas and courtyards of mul-unit housing.

State Law Smoking is prohibited in indoor common areas ofapartments and condominiums if the areas are places of employment.These areas are places of employment if there is an employee whoworks on the property, such as an on-site property manager, securityguard or maintenance worker.

Criteria

4 Smoking restricted in all indoor and outdoor common areas, including ordinances that allow for designated

smoking areas in outdoor common areas2 Smoking restricted in all indoor common areas, but not outdoor common areas0 No restricons on smoking in common areas

Di l


20/86

NuisanceDescripon Declaring involuntary exposure to secondhand smoke a nuisance, which allows members of thepublic to use nuisance abatement laws to stop the exposure.

State Law There is no statewide declaraon that specically declares secondhand smoke a nuisance.However, California law does declare anything that is injurious to health or obstructs the free use of property, soas to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property, a nuisance. Under this denion it is possibleto prove involuntary secondhand smoke as a nuisance, but specically declaring that exposure as a nuisancelowers the burden of proof and makes it easier to stop that exposure.

Criteria

1 bonus point Secondhand smoke exposure is declared a nuisance throughout the city or declared a nuisancewithin a housing seng.

Housing Authority Nonsmoking UnitsDescripon Prohibing smoking within the actual units, paos and balconies of mul-unit housing units thatare under the control of the city or county Housing Authority, such as low-income, senior or migrant housing.These policies generally need to be approved by the City Council/Board of Supervisors. It is important to note

that not all cies or counes have housing authories, these cies will not receive a bonus point.

State Law There are no statewide restricons on smoking in the units of housing authories.

Criteria1 bonus point Smoking is prohibited within a certain percentage of units for some or all of the mul-unithousing complexes under the control of the housing authority

REDUCING SALES OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS

Descripon An important aspect of reducing smoking prevalence rates in California is to reduce the availabilityand sales of tobacco products. This reducon in access to tobacco products can be done through requiringlocaons that sell tobacco products to meet certain requirements, through liming where tobacco products canbe sold, or through regulang the sampling of tobacco products.


21/86

State Law It is illegal in the state to sell or give tobacco products to anyone under the age of 18. There are lawsin California to punish the business owner or the clerk when an illegal sale is made. Tobacco retailers are alsorequired to obtain a state tobacco retailer license, which has generally been used to combat black market salesand tax evasion.

Criteria In order for a local licensing ordinance to eecvely reduce illegal sales to minors, it must containfour provisions: (1) requiring tobacco retailers to pay an annual fee that suciently covers administraonand enforcement eorts, including compliance checks; (2) requirement that all retailers obtain a license tosell tobacco and renew it annually; (3) provision that any violaon of a local, state or federal tobacco law is

considered a violaon of the license; and (4) nancial deterrent through nes and penales for violaons thatincludes suspension and revocaon of the license. Of these four provisions, it is essenal that the licensingordinance requires a sucient fee that will cover the administraon and enforcement of the license to ensurethat these acvies occur. A city/county can get credit for meeng the annual fee requirement if it uses othersustainable funding sources (such as funds from the Master Selement Agreement) that are dedicated foradministraon and enforcement of the retailer license. The grade for Local Tobacco Retailer Licensing Ordinanceis based on the provisions of the ordinance that a city or county has adopted with the following scale:4 Licensing ordinance with sucient annual fee and the other 3 provisions outlined above3 Licensing ordinance with sucient annual fee and 2 of the other 3 provisions outlined above

2 Licensing ordinance with sucient annual fee and 1 of the other 3 provisions outlined above1 Licensing ordinance with sucient annual fee and 0 of the other 3 provisions outlined above or licensingordinance with insucient annual fee and any of the other 3 provisions outlined above

0 No licensing ordinance or a licensing ordinance none of the provisions outlined above

Sale of Tobacco Products Near Schools and ParksDescripon Cies and counes can restrict where tobacco retailers are located and can prohibit them frombeing located within a certain distance, such as within 1,000 feet, of schools and parks. This type of policycan be enacted in several ways including through condional use permits, other zoning restricons and local

tobacco retailer licensing ordinances. By reducing the presence of tobacco retailers in locaons where youthcongregate, this type of policy can reduce sales of tobacco products to youth and assist with eorts to reduceyouth smoking.

St t L Th id l i b il f b i i hi i di f


22/86


23/86

American Lung Associaon in California | State of Tobacco Control 2014 California Local Grades 23

State of Tobacco Control 2014 California Local Grades

Overall Tobacco Control Grade: A (11-12), B (8-10), C (5-7), D (2-4), F (0-1);

determined by grades and points from other three categories A (4), B (3), C (2), D (1), F (0)

Smokefree Outdoor Air Grade: A (18+), B (13-17), C (8-12), D (3-7), F (0-2)

Smokefree Housing Grade: A (11+), B (8-10), C (5-7), D (2-4), F (0-1)

Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products Grade: A (4+), B (3), C (2), D (1), F (0)

ALAMEDA COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade B A A A C B C D D B F D C A CTotal Points 12 9 11 12 12 5 8 5 3 4 10 0 4 6 12 5

Smokefree Outdoor Air A A A A B A A D C B F C A A B

Dining 4 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 4 n/a 4 4 4 4

Entryways 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 4 0 2 4 4 4

Public Events 4 4 4 4 2 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0

Recreaon Areas 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 2 0 4 0 0 4 4 4

Service Areas 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 4 4 0 4 4 4 4

Sidewalks 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worksites 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0

Total Points 22 20 20 21 18 17 22 19 6 12 16 0 10 21 21 16

Smokefree Housing A B A A D B F D D B F D D A D

Nonsmoking Units 4 4 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0

Nonsmoking Common Areas 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 2 2 4 0 2 2 4 2

Disclosure 4 4 4 4 3 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 3 0

Nuisance 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0

Housing Authority Units 1 1 n/a 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 n/a n/a n/a 1 n/a n/a 0

Total Points 14 13 8 12 12 4 8 0 2 2 8 0 3 3 12 2

Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products D A A A D D D D D A F D D A D

Tobacco Retailer Licensing 4 0 4 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0

Sales near Schools and Parks 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0

Sales in Pharmacies 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sampling of Tobacco Products 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1

Total Points 7 1 5 6 5 1 1 1 1 1 6 0 1 1 6 1

Alame

da

PossiblePo

ints

Albany

Berkeley

Dubli

n

Emeryville

Fremo

nt

Hayw

ard

Liverm

ore

Newa

rk

Oakla

nd

Piedm

ont

Pleasanton

SanLeandr

o

Union

CityCounty

Uninc

orporate

d


24/86


25/86








AMADOR COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F F F F FTotal Points 12 0 0 0 1 0 0

Smokefree Outdoor Air F F F D F F

Dining 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Entryways 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Public Events 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Recreaon Areas 4 0 2 2 4 0 0

Service Areas 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sidewalks 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 22 0 2 2 4 0 0

Smokefree Housing F F F F F F

Nonsmoking Units 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nonsmoking Common Areas 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Disclosure 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Housing Authority Units 1 0 0 0 0 0 0


Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F F F F

Tobacco Retailer Licensing 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sales near Schools and Parks 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sales in Pharmacies 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sampling of Tobacco Products 1 0 0 0 0 0 0


Amador

PossiblePo

ints

Ione

Jac

kson

Plymo

uth

Sue

rCreek

County

Uninc

orporate

d


26/86

26 www.lung.org/california 1-800-LUNG-USA 1-800-586-4872







BUTTE COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F D F C F FTotal Points 12 0 4 0 5 1 1

Smokefree Outdoor Air F C F F F F

Dining 4 0 2 0 0 0 0

Entryways 4 0 4 0 0 0 0

Public Events 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Recreaon Areas 4 0 4 0 0 2 0

Service Areas 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sidewalks 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 22 0 10 0 0 2 0

Smokefree Housing F D F D D D

Nonsmoking Units 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nonsmoking Common Areas 4 0 2 0 2 2 2

Disclosure 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Housing Authority Units 1 0 0 0 0 0 0


Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F D F A F F

Tobacco Retailer Licensing 4 0 0 0 4 0 0

Sales near Schools and Parks 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sales in Pharmacies 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sampling of Tobacco Products 1 0 1 0 0 0 0


Biggs

PossiblePo

ints

Chico

Gridl

ey

Oroville

Paradise

County

Uninc

orporate

d


27/86








CALAVERAS COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F FTotal Points 12 0 0

Smokefree Outdoor Air F F

Dining 4 0 0

Entryways 4 0 0

Public Events 4 0 0

Recreaon Areas 4 0 0

Service Areas 4 0 0

Sidewalks 1 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0

Total Points 22 0 0

Smokefree Housing F F

Nonsmoking Units 4 0 0

Nonsmoking Common Areas 4 0 0

Disclosure 4 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0

Housing Authority Units 1 0 0

Total Points 14 0 0

Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F

Tobacco Retailer Licensing 4 0 0

Sales near Schools and Parks 1 0 0

Sales in Pharmacies 1 0 0

Sampling of Tobacco Products 1 0 0

Total Points 7 0 0

AngelsCity

PossiblePo

ints

County

Uninc

orporate

d


28/86








COLUSA COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F FTotal Points 12 1 1 0

Smokefree Outdoor Air D D F

Dining 4 0 0 0

Entryways 4 0 0 0

Public Events 4 0 0 0

Recreaon Areas 4 4 4 2

Service Areas 4 0 0 0

Sidewalks 1 0 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0 0

Total Points 22 4 4 2

Smokefree Housing F F F

Nonsmoking Units 4 0 0 0

Nonsmoking Common Areas 4 0 0 0

Disclosure 4 0 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0 0

Housing Authority Units 1 0 0 0


Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F

Tobacco Retailer Licensing 4 0 0 0

Sales near Schools and Parks 1 0 0 0

Sales in Pharmacies 1 0 0 0

Sampling of Tobacco Products 1 0 0 0


Colus

a

PossiblePo

ints

Williams

County

Uninc

orporate

d


29/86








CONTRA COSTA COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F D C D F F C B F F F C F B A D C B ATotal Points 12 0 0 2 6 2 0 0 7 8 0 0 1 7 0 8 12 4 7 8 11

Smokefree Outdoor Air F F D C D F F A A F F F A F B A F A A A

Dining 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 2 4 0 4 4 4

Entryways 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 3 4 0 4 4 4

Public Events 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 3 4 0 4 0 4

Recreaon Areas 4 0 0 4 2 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 4 4 0 4 4 4

Service Areas 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 4 4 0 4 4 4

Sidewalks 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

Worksites 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

Total Points 22 0 0 4 9 4 0 0 21 21 0 0 0 20 0 16 20 0 20 18 20

Smokefree Housing F F F F F F F C B F F F C F A A F D A B

Nonsmoking Units 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 4 0 0 4 1

Nonsmoking Common Areas 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 4 4 0 4 4 4

Disclosure 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 0 0 4 3

Nuisance 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0

Housing Authority Units 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 n/a 1 n/a n/a n/a 0

Total Points 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 5 0 11 13 0 4 13 8

Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F D A D F F D D F F D D F D A A C F A

Tobacco Retailer Licensing 4 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 4 1 0 4

Sales near Schools and Parks 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sales in Pharmacies 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Sampling of Tobacco Products 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1

Total Points 7 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 6 4 2 0 5

Ano

ch

PossibleP

oints

Brentwoo

d

Clayto

n

Concord

Danville

ElCerrito

Hercules

Lafay

ee

Mar

nez

Moraga

Oakle

y

Orind

a

Pinole

Pisburg

PleasantH

ill

Richm

ond

SanP

ablo

SanR

amon

Waln

utCreek

County

Uninc

orporated


30/86








DEL NORTE COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade D FTotal Points 12 3 1

Smokefree Outdoor Air B D

Dining 4 n/a 0

Entryways 4 4 4

Public Events 4 4 0


Service Areas 4 0 0

Sidewalks 1 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0

Total Points 22 12 4




Disclosure 4 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0

Housing Authority Units 1 n/a n/a

Total Points 14 0 0






Total Points 7 0 0

CrescentC

ity

PossibleP

oints

County

Uninc

orporated


31/86








EL DORADO COUNTY


Smokefree Outdoor Air F F F

Dining 4 0 0 0

Entryways 4 0 0 0




Sidewalks 1 0 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0 0





Disclosure 4 0 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0 0









Placerville

PossibleP

oints

SouthLak

eTahoe

County

Uninc

orporated


32/86








FRESNO COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F C F F F F F F F D F F F F FTotal Points 12 1 0 6 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 4 1 0 0 0 0

Smokefree Outdoor Air D F C F D F F F D D F D F F F F

Dining 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Entryways 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Public Events 4 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Recreaon Areas 4 4 2 4 0 4 0 2 2 4 4 0 4 0 0 2 2

Service Areas 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sidewalks 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 22 6 2 8 0 4 0 2 2 4 4 0 6 0 0 2 2

Smokefree Housing F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F

Nonsmoking Units 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nonsmoking Common Areas 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Disclosure 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Housing Authority Units 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Total Points 14 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F A D F F F F F F A F F F F F

Tobacco Retailer Licensing 4 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0

Sales near Schools and Parks 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sales in Pharmacies 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sampling of Tobacco Products 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 7 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0

Clovis

PossibleP

oints

Coalinga

Firebaugh

Fowler

Fresno

Huron

Kerm

an

Kingsburg

Mendota

OrangeCo

ve

Parlie

r

Reedley

Sanger

SanJoaqu

in

Selm

aCounty

Uninc

orporated


33/86








GLENN COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade D F FTotal Points 12 3 0 0

Smokefree Outdoor Air B F F

Dining 4 2 0 0

Entryways 4 4 0 0




Sidewalks 1 0 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0 0





Disclosure 4 0 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0 0









Orlan

d

PossibleP

oints

Willo

wsCounty

Uninc

orporated


34/86








HUMBOLDT COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade C C C F F F F FTotal Points 12 5 5 7 0 0 0 0 0

Smokefree Outdoor Air A A A F F F F F

Dining 4 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0

Entryways 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0

Public Events 4 4 3 4 0 0 0 0 0

Recreaon Areas 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0

Service Areas 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0

Sidewalks 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Worksites 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 22 20 18 20 0 0 0 0 0

Smokefree Housing D D B F F F F F

Nonsmoking Units 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nonsmoking Common Areas 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0

Disclosure 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Housing Authority Units 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 14 4 4 10 0 0 0 0 0

Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F F F F F F

Tobacco Retailer Licensing 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sales near Schools and Parks 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sales in Pharmacies 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sampling of Tobacco Products 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Arcata

PossibleP

oints

BlueLake

Eurek

a

Ferndale

Fortu

naRio

Dell

Trinid

adCounty

Uninc

orporated


35/86








IMPERIAL COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F B F D F F F FTotal Points 12 0 8 0 2 0 1 0 0

Smokefree Outdoor Air F B F D F D F F

Dining 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Entryways 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Public Events 4 2 4 0 4 0 0 0 0

Recreaon Areas 4 0 4 0 0 0 3 0 2

Service Areas 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sidewalks 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 22 2 16 0 4 0 3 0 2

Smokefree Housing F D F D F F F F

Nonsmoking Units 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nonsmoking Common Areas 4 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0

Disclosure 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Housing Authority Units 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Total Points 14 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0

Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F A F F F F F F

Tobacco Retailer Licensing 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sales near Schools and Parks 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sales in Pharmacies 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sampling of Tobacco Products 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 7 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Brawley

PossibleP

oints

Calexico

Calip

atria

ElCentro

Holtville

Imperial

Westmorl

and

County

Uninc

orporated


36/86








INYO COUNTY



Dining 4 0 0

Entryways 4 0 0

Public Events 4 0 0


Service Areas 4 n/a n/a

Sidewalks 1 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0

Total Points 22 2 2



Nonsmoking Common Areas 4 n/a 0

Disclosure 4 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0

Housing Authority Units 1 n/a n/a

Total Points 14 0 0






Total Points 7 0 0

Bisho

pPo

ssibleP

oins

County

Uninc

orporated


37/86








KERN COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F D D F D F F F C D DTotal Points 12 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 0 0 5 4 4

Smokefree Outdoor Air F F F F F F F F F D F F

Dining 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Entryways 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Public Events 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Recreaon Areas 4 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0

Service Areas 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sidewalks 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 22 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0

Smokefree Housing F F F F F F F F F F F F

Nonsmoking Units 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nonsmoking Common Areas 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Disclosure 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Housing Authority Units 1 1 1 n/a 1 0 1 n/a 1 n/a n/a 1 1

Total Points 14 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1

Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F A A F A F F F A A A

Tobacco Retailer Licensing 4 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 4

Sales near Schools and Parks 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sales in Pharmacies 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sampling of Tobacco Products 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 7 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 4

Arvin

Po

ssibleP

oints

Bakersel

d

Califo

rniaCity

Delan

oMaricopa

McFarlan

d

Ridgecres

t

Shaer

Ta

Teha

chapi

Wasco

County

Uninc

orporated


38/86








KINGS COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F F F FTotal Points 12 0 0 0 0 0

Smokefree Outdoor Air F F F F F

Dining 4 0 0 0 0 0

Entryways 4 0 0 0 0 0

Public Events 4 0 0 0 0 0

Recreaon Areas 4 0 0 0 2 0

Service Areas 4 0 0 0 0 0

Sidewalks 1 0 0 0 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 22 0 0 0 2 0

Smokefree Housing F F F F F

Nonsmoking Units 4 0 0 0 0 0

Nonsmoking Common Areas 4 0 0 0 0 0

Disclosure 4 0 0 0 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0 0 0 0

Housing Authority Units 1 0 0 0 0 0


Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F F F

Tobacco Retailer Licensing 4 0 0 0 0 0

Sales near Schools and Parks 1 0 0 0 0 0

Sales in Pharmacies 1 0 0 0 0 0

Sampling of Tobacco Products 1 0 0 0 0 0


Avenal

PossibleP

oints

Corco

ranHa

nford

Lemoore

County

Uninc

orporated


39/86








LAKE COUNTY


Smokefree Outdoor Air D D F

Dining 4 0 0 0

Entryways 4 0 0 0




Sidewalks 1 0 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0 0





Disclosure 4 0 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0 0









Clearlake

PossibleP

oints

Lakeport

County

Uninc

orporated


40/86








LASSEN COUNTY


Smokefree Outdoor Air D F

Dining 4 0 0

Entryways 4 0 0

Public Events 4 2 0


Service Areas 4 0 0

Sidewalks 1 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0

Total Points 22 6 0




Disclosure 4 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0


Total Points 14 0 0






Total Points 7 0 0

Susanville

PossibleP

oints

County

Uninc

orporated


41/86








LOS ANGELES COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F D D D F A F F F C F B A B C F F A F F C FTotal Points 12 0 1 2 3 2 0 12 0 0 0 6 0 9 12 9 5 1 0 12 1 0 6 0

Smokefree Outdoor Air F D C F D F A F F F C F B A A D D F A D F C F

Dining 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 2 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0

Entryways 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 4 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0

Public Events 4 0 2 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

Recreaon Areas 4 0 4 4 0 2 2 4 0 0 0 4 0 3 4 4 4 4 0 4 4 0 4 2

Service Areas 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

Sidewalks 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 22 0 6 8 0 6 2 18 0 0 0 10 0 16 22 21 4 4 0 20 4 0 8 2

Smokefree Housing F F F F F F A F F F F F C A D F F F A F F F F

Nonsmoking Units 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

Nonsmoking Common Areas 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

Disclosure 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Housing Authority Units 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 5 12 4 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0

Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F B D F A F F F A F A A A A F F A F F A F

Tobacco Retailer Licensing 4 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 4 4 4 4 0 0 4 0 0 4 0

Sales near Schools and Parks 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sales in Pharmacies 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sampling of Tobacco Products 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 7 0 0 0 3 1 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 4 5 4 4 0 0 4 0 0 4 0

AgouraH

ills

PossibleP

oints

Alhambra

Arcadia

Artes

iaAvalo

nAzusa

Baldw

inPark

Bell

Bell

ower

BellG

ardens

BeverlyH

ills

Bradbury

Burbank

Calab

asas

Carso

nCerritos

Claremon

t

Commerc

e

Compton

Covin

aCudahy

Culve

rCity

Diam

ondBar


42/86








LOS ANGELES COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F C C D C A F D C D F A F C F D D F F F F D DTotal Points 12 1 5 5 4 5 12 1 4 6 3 0 12 0 6 0 4 2 1 0 1 0 4 4

Smokefree Outdoor Air D D D F D A D F C B F A F C F F C F F D F F F

Dining 4 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Entryways 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Public Events 4 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Recreaon Areas 4 3 4 4 2 4 4 4 0 4 4 0 4 0 4 2 0 4 0 2 4 0 0 0

Service Areas 4 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sidewalks 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 22 6 6 4 2 6 19 4 0 8 17 0 22 0 8 2 0 8 0 2 4 0 0 0

Smokefree Housing F F F F F A F F F F F A F F F F F F F F F F F

Nonsmoking Units 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nonsmoking Common Areas 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Disclosure 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Housing Authority Units 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 14 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F A A A A A F A A F F A F A F A F D F F F A A

Tobacco Retailer Licensing 4 0 4 4 4 4 4 0 4 4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 4

Sales near Schools and Parks 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Sales in Pharmacies 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sampling of Tobacco Products 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 7 0 5 4 4 4 4 0 4 4 0 0 6 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 4 4

Downey

Duarte

ElMonte

ElSe

gundo

Gardena

Glendale

Glendora

Hawaiian

Gard

ens

Hawthorn

e

Hermosa

Beach

HiddenH

ills

Hunngto

nPark

Industry

Inglewoo

d

Irwindale

LaCanada

Flintridg

e

LaHabra

Heigh

ts

LaMirada

LaPuente

LaVerne

Lakewoo

d

Lancaster

Lawn

dale

PossibleP

oints


43/86








LOS ANGELES COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade C C C D C F F F D C F C F F A F F F F F F FTotal Points 12 5 7 5 4 6 1 1 0 4 7 0 6 0 0 12 0 0 1 1 0 1 1

Smokefree Outdoor Air D C D F C D F F F C F D F F A F F D D F F D D

Dining 4 0 2 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Entryways 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Public Events 4 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Recreaon Areas 4 4 4 3 0 2 4 2 2 0 4 0 3 2 0 4 2 2 3 4 0 0 4 4

Service Areas 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sidewalks 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Total Points 22 4 10 7 0 12 7 2 2 0 12 0 5 2 0 21 2 2 3 4 1 0 4 4

Smokefree Housing F D F F F F F F F D F D F F A F F F F n/a F F F

Nonsmoking Units 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nonsmoking Common Areas 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Disclosure 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Housing Authority Units 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 14 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products A A A A A F D F A A F A F F A F F F F n/a F F F

Tobacco Retailer Licensing 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 1 0 4 4 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sales near Schools and Parks 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sales in Pharmacies 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sampling of Tobacco Products 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 7 4 4 4 4 4 0 1 0 4 4 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lomita

PossibleP

oints

Long

Beach

LosA

ngeles

Lynwood

Malibu

Manha

anBeach

Maywoo

d

Monrovia

Montebe

llo

Montere

yPark

Norwalk

Palm

dale

Palos

VerdesEst

ates

Param

ount

Pasadena

PicoRive

ra

Pomona

RanchoP

alosVerd

es

Redondo

Beach

RollingH

ills

RollingHi

llsEst

ates

Rosemea

d

SanDima

s


44/86


45/86








MADERA COUNTY


Smokefree Outdoor Air F F F

Dining 4 0 0 0

Entryways 4 0 0 0




Sidewalks 1 0 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0 0





Disclosure 4 0 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0 0









Chowchil

la

Possible

Point

s

Madera

CountyUninc

orporated


46/86








MARIN COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F C B B B C D A B C ATotal Points 12 1 1 7 8 9 9 5 3 12 8 7 12

Smokefree Outdoor Air F D B A A A A C A A B A

Dining 4 2 0 2 4 4 2 2 4 4 4 4 2

Entryways 4 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Public Events 4 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 0 3 4 4 4

Recreaon Areas 4 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Service Areas 4 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 0 4 4 0 4

Sidewalks 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1

Total Points 22 2 4 15 21 21 19 18 12 21 21 16 19

Smokefree Housing D F A A D A D D A A A A

Nonsmoking Units 4 0 0 4 4 0 3 0 0 4 4 4 4

Nonsmoking Common Areas 4 2 0 4 4 2 4 2 2 4 4 4 4

Disclosure 4 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 0 4 4 4 4

Nuisance 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1

Housing Authority Units 1 n/a n/a 0 n/a n/a 0 n/a 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 14 2 0 13 13 2 12 2 2 12 13 12 13

Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products n/a F F F A D n/a F A F F A

Tobacco Retailer Licensing 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 4

Sales near Schools and Parks 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1

Sales in Pharmacies 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sampling of Tobacco Products 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 7 0 0 0 4 1 0 5 0 0 5

Belveder

e

Possible

Point

s

CorteMa

dera

Fairfax

Larkspur

MillValle

y

Novato

Ross

SanAnse

lmo

SanR

afae

l

Sausalito

TiburonCo

untyUn

incorp

orated


47/86








MARIPOSA COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade FTotal Points 12 0

Smokefree Outdoor Air F

Dining 4 0

Entryways 4 0

Public Events 4 0

Recreaon Areas 4 2

Service Areas 4 0

Sidewalks 1 0

Worksites 1 0

Total Points 22 2

Smokefree Housing F

Nonsmoking Units 4 0

Nonsmoking Common Areas 4 0

Disclosure 4 0

Nuisance 1 0

Housing Authority Units 1 0

Total Points 14 0

Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F

Tobacco Retailer Licensing 4 0

Sales near Schools and Parks 1 0

Sales in Pharmacies 1 0

Sampling of Tobacco Products 1 0

Total Points 7 0

Possible

Point

s

CountyUnincorp

orate

d


48/86








MENDOCINO COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade C F C D CTotal Points 12 6 0 6 4 5

Smokefree Outdoor Air D F C F F

Dining 4 0 0 0 0 0

Entryways 4 2 0 0 0 0

Public Events 4 0 0 4 0 0

Recreaon Areas 4 4 0 4 0 0

Service Areas 4 0 0 0 0 0

Sidewalks 1 1 0 0 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0 0 0 0


Smokefree Housing D F F F D

Nonsmoking Units 4 0 0 0 0 0

Nonsmoking Common Areas 4 2 0 0 0 2

Disclosure 4 0 0 0 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0 0 0 0

Housing Authority Units 1 0 0 0 0 0


Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products A F A A A

Tobacco Retailer Licensing 4 4 0 4 4 4

Sales near Schools and Parks 1 0 0 0 0 0

Sales in Pharmacies 1 0 0 0 0 0

Sampling of Tobacco Products 1 0 0 0 0 0


FortBrag

g

Possible

Point

s

PointAre

na

Ukiah

Willits Co

unty

Unincorp

orated


49/86








MERCED COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F F F F F FTotal Points 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Smokefree Outdoor Air F F F F F F F

Dining 4 0 n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0

Entryways 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Public Events 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Recreaon Areas 4 2 0 0 0 0 2 0

Service Areas 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sidewalks 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 22 2 0 0 0 0 2 0

Smokefree Housing F F F F F F F

Nonsmoking Units 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nonsmoking Common Areas 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Disclosure 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Housing Authority Units 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F F F F F

Tobacco Retailer Licensing 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sales near Schools and Parks 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sales in Pharmacies 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sampling of Tobacco Products 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atwater

DosPalo

s

Gusne

Livingsto

n

LosBano

s

Merced

County

Unincorp

orated

Possible

Point

s


50/86








MODOC COUNTY



Dining 4 0 0

Entryways 4 0 0

Public Events 4 0 0


Service Areas 4 0 0

Sidewalks 1 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0

Total Points 22 0 0




Disclosure 4 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0


Total Points 14 0 0






Total Points 7 0 0

AlturasCo

unty

Unincorp

orate

d

Possible

Point

s


51/86








MONO COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade C FTotal Points 12 5 0

Smokefree Outdoor Air A F

Dining 4 4 0

Entryways 4 4 0

Public Events 4 4 0


Service Areas 4 4 0

Sidewalks 1 0 0

Worksites 1 1 0

Total Points 22 21 2

Smokefree Housing D F



Disclosure 4 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0


Total Points 14 4 0






Total Points 7 0 0

Mammo

thLakes

County

Unincorp

orate

d

Possible

Point

s


52/86








MONTEREY COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade C F F F F F F F F F F F CTotal Points 12 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 5

Smokefree Outdoor Air D F D F F F D D F D F F F

Dining 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Entryways 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Public Events 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Recreaon Areas 4 4 0 4 0 0 0 2 4 0 2 0 0 0

Service Areas 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sidewalks 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0

Worksites 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 22 5 0 4 0 0 0 7 7 0 3 0 0 0

Smokefree Housing F F F F F F F F D F F F D

Nonsmoking Units 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nonsmoking Common Areas 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2

Disclosure 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nuisance 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Housing Authority Units 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Points 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2

Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products A F F F F F F F F F D F A

Tobacco Retailer Licensing 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4

Sales near Schools and Parks 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sales in Pharmacies 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sampling of Tobacco Products 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Total Points 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4

Carmel-b

y-the

-Sea

Possible

Point

s

DelRey

Oaks

Gonzale

s

Greene

ld

KingCity

Marina

Montere

y

PacicG

rove

Salinas

SandCit

y

Seaside

Soledad

County

Unincorp

orated


53/86








NAPA COUNTY

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F F F F DTotal Points 12 0 0 1 1 0 2

Smokefree Outdoor Air F

sotc 2014 california local

Documents