sound test
DESCRIPTION
Sound Test. Testing and Integration of a Rocket-Launched Video Imaging Platform. IniTech Engineering. Apoorva Bhopale Susan Schmidt Rob Wingo Brian Love. 1 May 2002. Project Background. Project is sponsored by Applied Research Labs Main Objective: - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Sound TestSound Test
2
Testing and Integration of a Rocket-Launched Video Imaging Platform
Testing and Integration of a Rocket-Launched Video Imaging Platform
IniTech EngineeringIniTech Engineering
Apoorva Bhopale Susan Schmidt Rob Wingo Brian LoveApoorva Bhopale Susan Schmidt Rob Wingo Brian Love
1 May 20021 May 2002
3
Project BackgroundProject Background
• Project is sponsored by Applied Research Labs• Main Objective:
– Prove the validity of a rocket launched balloon as a telecommunications platform
• Possible uses, disaster relief, drug interdiction, inexpensive “throwaway” satellites
• Rocket is to be launched this summer
4
Overview of the Presentation Overview of the Presentation
• Goals to accomplish – Description of each goal– Work completed for each goal
• Future work
• Questions
5
Semester Goals Semester Goals
• Design and build payload canister with mountings for electronics
• Size and build drogue chute
• Test balloon buoyancy
• Test Electronics
• Test balloon deployment
6
Flight ProfileFlight Profile
7
Chute SizingChute Sizing
Brian Love
8
Drogue ChuteDrogue Chute
• Required to deploy balloon after ejection• Will be used to slow descent after operations
9
SizingSizing
• Previous work concluded that a small chute will deploy the balloon
• Limiting factors for design are descent constraints
Considerations• Weight of payload• Altitude• Allowable impact
velocity
10
AlgorithmAlgorithm
2
2
tdVC
WA
2
2 2
4 tdVC
Wd
2
2
1td AVCWD
D = drag forceW = weightρ = air densityCd = coefficient of dragA = areaVt = terminal velocity
4
22 d
rA
r = chute radiusd = chute diameter
dt
td C
mgV
VC
Wd
2
28
2
m = massg = gravitational acceleration
11
CalculationsCalculations
altitude(m) air density(kg/m^3) impact velocity(m/s) mass(kg) Cd diameter(m) diameter(in)1000 1.1 3 4.5 1.5 2.751361112 108.3213036
Standard Atmosphere
12
Chute DesignChute Design
116”
Weight: 14.2 oz.
108”
13
Balloon TiltBalloon Tilt
• Weight drop of 11 oz. from 25 to 14 oz.
• Balloon used was ~1/4 scale
14
Neutral BuoyancyNeutral Buoyancy
15
CalculationsCalculations
R
PTRTP
STPneededdiff TTT
kgmass
Vballooninmass
payloadballoon
STPballoonair
4~
*
Need mass air inside balloon 4kg less than the STP valuefor neutral buoyancy
balloon
neededneeded V
mass
R
PT
neededneeded
16
Temperature DifferenceTemperature DifferenceTemperature Difference for Neutral Buoyancy
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
Altitude (m)
Te
mp
era
ture
Dif
fere
nc
e (
de
g C
)
17
ConsiderationsConsiderations
• Absorbed solar energy
• Air circulation inside balloon
• Descent rate of inflated balloon vs. chute
• Thermal updrafts
• Need experimental data to prove theoretical
• Testing difficult on ground
18
Payload CanisterPayload Canister
Susan Schmidt
19
Initial Avionics CanisterDesign
Initial Avionics CanisterDesign
• Canister made of 4.25 inch
PVC pipe
• Covered in carbon fiber
• Electronic components
secured with bubble wrap
• Plexiglas bottom
for camera
20
Previous Canister Design Changes
Previous Canister Design Changes
• Components hit canister walls and each other
• Bubble wrap was not sufficient vibration control
• Foam was then used to secure items
21
Issues with Past DesignsIssues with Past Designs
• Carbon fiber blocks radio waves
• Electrical components not secure
• Plexiglas fogs at higher altitude
• Plexiglas cracks easily
• Component constraints cannot handle temperatures of high altitudes
22
Requirements for the Avionics CanisterRequirements for the Avionics Canister
• Structural integrity
•Limit component vibration
•Airtight seal
• Temperature control
23
Structural IntegrityExternal Material Options
Structural IntegrityExternal Material Options
• Metals– Possible Shrapnel
– Weight
• Porous materials, i.e. wood– Airtight seal
• Plexiglas– Cracks easily
• Lexan– High cost
– Availability
And the winner is…
24
PVCPVC
• Weather Resistant• High strength to weight ratio• Corrosion Resistant• Good thermal insulator• Self-extinguishing• Low cost!!
25
Internal StructureInternal Structure
• High impact resistance• Used to stabilize internal components• Used for the camera viewing area
26
Limit Component VibrationLimit Component Vibration
• Two 0.09” thick Lexan perpendicular
boards
• Secured components with nuts and bolts
• Ends capped with hobby plywood
27
Airtight SealAirtight Seal
• Change in pressure from sea level to higher altitudes cause fogging on the Lexan
• Seal end of canister with Teflon Tape
• Teflon tape for extruding connections
• Pump in Nitrogen through a gas fitting
• Inert gas replaces the water vapor
28
Temperature ControlTemperature Control
• Camera’s operating range: -1.1°C to 37.77°C• Above 8,000 feet the temperature drops
below this operating range• The rocket test in summer will not reach
this altitude• The temperature limits of the components
must be evaluated for higher flights
29
ElectronicsElectronics
Rob Wingo
30
Electronic ComponentsElectronic Components
• Accelerometer board
• GPS/Video Overlay board
• GPS receiver
• Video camera
• Telemetry system
• Batteries
31
Semester ObjectivesSemester Objectives
• Connect all of components and make work
• Range test telemetry system
• Find problem with power source
• Determine how to use accelerometer board as an event trigger
• Mount electronics in canister
32
Component ConnectivityComponent Connectivity
• Successfully connected all components
33
Range Test: First tryRange Test: First try
• Unsuccessful
• Assumed power problem
34
Range Test: Second tryRange Test: Second try
• Made adjustments to power supply and connectivity board
• Still unsuccessful
35
Range Test: Third tryRange Test: Third try
• Re-soldered connectivity board
• Still unsuccessful
• Contacted transmitter manufacturer
• Discovered range can be drastically reduced by ground effects
36
Ground Effect ProblemGround Effect Problem
• Transmitter designed for aerial use only
• Will not be able to accomplish range test on ground
37
Balloon DeploymentBalloon Deployment
Apoorva Bhopale
38
Balloon DeploymentBalloon Deployment
• Objectives– Determine a method to pack the balloon– Determine an adequate amount of black powder
to eject the canister
39
Balloon SizeBalloon Size
40
Suggested MethodSuggested Method
41
Pyrotechnic EjectionPyrotechnic Ejection
• Advantages– Reliable– Lightweight– Used extensively
42
Possible Failure Modes of the Ejection
Possible Failure Modes of the Ejection
• Too Little Black Powder– Does not clear ejection tube
• Inhibits the rockets main chute deployment
• Payload crashes with the rocket
• Too much Black Powder– Rocket tube explodes– Drogue chute rips from balloon– Burnt drogue chute or balloon
43
Theory of Pyrotechnic EjectionTheory of Pyrotechnic Ejection
TR
VdPWP **
• Wp =Weight of Black Powder (lbs)• dP = Ejection Charge Pressure in Psi• V = Free volume in cubic inches• R = Combustion gas constant 22.16 ft-
lbf/lbm-R• T = Combustion gas temperature, 3307
degrees R
44
Test FootageTest Footage
45
Conclusions From Test Conclusions From Test
• Place Canister closest to the ejection charge
• Use 7 grams of Black Powder
46
ConclusionConclusion
• Design and build payload canister with mountings for electronics
• Size and build drogue chute
• Test balloon buoyancy
• Test Electronics
• Test balloon deployment
47
Future WorkFuture Work
• Verify range of the transmitter another way– Possibly send it back to manufacturer
• Test the deployment method in a rocket• Determine a way to sever connection
between balloon and canister• Neutral Buoyancy test• Setup accelerometer board to be used as
event trigger
48
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements
• Dr. Ronald Stearman• Dr. Martin Barlett• Dr. Jennifer Lehman• Danny Linehan• Daniel Parcher• Rick VanVoorhis• Lixin Gong
49
QuestionsQuestions