sources of oxygen demand in the lower san joaquin river, california
DESCRIPTION
Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California. P. W. Lehman, J. Sevier, J. Giulianotti & M. Johnson. California Department of Water Resources. 122 20’ N. 122 00’ N. 121 40’ N. 121 20’ N. Sacramento. CALIFORNIA. 38 20’ W. River. o. e. River. m. a. r. c. a. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River,
California
P. W. Lehman,
J. Sevier, J. Giulianotti & M. Johnson
California Department of Water Resources
![Page 2: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
StocktonAntioch
Sacramento
River
River
CALIFORNIA
38 00’ W
38 20’ W
Carquinez straight
122 20’ N 122 00’ N 121 40’ N 121 20’ N
Sa c ra
m
eo
San
San Francisco BayMossdale
![Page 3: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Current situation:
There has been little change in dissolved oxygen concentration in
the channel despite enhanced management and a decrease in
phytoplankton biomass
![Page 4: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Aug Oct Sep Nov Aug Oct
Per
cen
t
1970 -1979 1980 - 1989 1990 - 1999
Frequency of values below 5 mg l-1
![Page 5: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
70 75 80 85 90 95 2000
year
Rough and Ready Island
Ch
loro
ph
yll a
µg
l-1Chlorophyll a decreased over time in
the channel
![Page 6: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Question:
What are the primary sources of oxygen demand in the Deep Water
Channel near Stockton?
![Page 7: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Study Methods
biweekly or monthly sampling July - November 2000 & 2001
discrete variables: Primary productivity : in situ dissolved oxygen light and dark bottle technique Nutrient concentrations chlorophyll a and phaeophytin concentration BOD tests continuous variables
vertical profiles with YSI 6600 sonde continuous flow continuous water quality
![Page 8: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
STOCKTON
MC DONALD
MD
ROBERTS
ISLAND
ISLAND
Rough and Ready Island
Calaveras River
TB
CP
TC
RRL48San Joaquin River
Deep Water Channel
San Joaquin River
N
4 km
Middle River
VN
80o 00’ W
121o 20’ N
Water Treatment Plant
TC Turner CutRR Rough and Ready IslandL48 Navigation Light 48TB Turning BasinCP Channel PointMD MossdaleVN Vernalis
STOCKTON
MC DONALD
MD
ROBERTS
ISLAND
ISLAND
Rough and Ready Island
Calaveras River
TB
CP
TC
RRL48San Joaquin River
Deep Water Channel
San Joaquin River
N
4 km
NN
4 km
Middle River
VN
80o 00’ W
121o 20’ N
Water Treatment Plant
![Page 9: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Findings
![Page 10: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
0
5
10
15
1-Jun 1-Jul 31-Jul 30-Aug 29-Sep 29-Oct
Date
mg
/L
2001
Dissolved oxygen in DWSC
![Page 11: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
0
5
10
15
01-Jun 01-Jul 31-Jul 30-Aug 29-Sep 29-Oct
Date
mg
/L
MD 2001
Dissolved oxygen upstream
![Page 12: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Temperature oC
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
20 22 24 26
De
pth
m
18-Jul
Specific Conductance mS/cm
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 0.5 1
De
pth
m
Dissolved Oxygen mg/L
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Dep
th m
Oxygen depletion was not caused by stratification
![Page 13: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
-0.80
-0.40
0.00
0.40
0.80
26-Jun 18-Jul 16-Aug 29-Aug 14-Sep 3-Oct
Date
ox
yg
en
de
ma
nd
mg
/L
net oxygen demand phytoplankton bacteria
Oxygen demand was not caused by phytoplankton respiration
![Page 14: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
2001
0
2
4
6
8
26-Jun 25-Jul 16-Aug 5-Sep 3-Oct
Date
mg
/L o
xyg
en
TBOD NBOD CBOD
Oxygen demand was caused by nitrification
![Page 15: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Pearson Correlation Coefficients (n=103)
TBOD & NBOD 0.86
NBOD & ammonia 0.93
NBOD & organic N 0.34
TBOD & ammonia 0.78
TBOD & CBOD 0.62
TBOD & chlorophyll 0.59
![Page 16: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Year n R2
2000 100 0.91
2001 85 0.73
2000 + 2001 185 0.83
Stepwise Regression
Dissolved ammonia + carbonaceous BOD 60%
30%
![Page 17: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Where does the ammonia come
from ?
![Page 18: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
NBOD
Am
mo
nia
loa
d R
WC
F k
g/d
ay r = 0.74
NBOD was correlated with ammonia load from treatment plant
![Page 19: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
NBOD at Rough and Ready varied with the ammonia load from the treatment
plantRough and Ready
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
4-Jun 4-Jul 3-Aug 2-Sep 2-Oct
Date
NB
OD
10
mg
/L
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
RW
CF
NH
4-N
(l
bs
/da
y)
RRRWCF
![Page 20: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Total nitrogen load was higher from upstream
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Month
TK
N l
oad
k
g d
-1
June July August September October
Mossdale (MD) waste treatment plant
![Page 21: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Mass Balance Model
Object: Determine the largest source of dissolved ammonia in the channel
![Page 22: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Simple mass balance model
Daily dissolved ammonia load into the ship channel from the treatment plant and upstream
1) daily load of dissolved ammonia from each source
2) daily load of dissolved ammonia from the oxidation of the organic nitrogen load from each
source
3) daily load of dissolved ammonia from the oxidation of residual organic nitrogen from
previous day from each source
+
+
=
![Page 23: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
0
50
100
150
200
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Day
chlo
rop
hyl
l a
ug
l -1
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.8
amm
on
ia m
g l
-1
chlorophyll aammonia Log. (ammonia )
Ammonification rate
![Page 24: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
010203040506070
1 5 10 15 20 25
Residence time days
Me
dia
n p
erc
en
t
Waste treatment plant Mossdale
Upper boundary condition:
all organic nitrogen oxidized at ammonification rate for chlorophyll (highest rate)
![Page 25: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Chlorophyll was a small percent of the organic nitrogen load
05
1015202530354045
27-Jun 18-Jul 25-Jul 1-Aug 16-Aug 29-Aug 14-Sep 3-Oct
date
per
cen
tag
e
![Page 26: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
010203040506070
1 5 10 15 20 25
Residence time days
Me
dia
n p
erc
en
t
Waste treatment plant Mossdale
Lower boundary condition:
only the organic matter associated with live chlorophyll was oxidized
![Page 27: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Summar
y• Oxygen demand in the channel was primarily caused by nitrification
• The treatment plant could be the primary cause of nitrification in the channel on a daily basis even though it had a small ammonia load because it was a direct source of dissolved ammonia for bacterial oxidation
• The relative contribution of ammonia from the treatment plant and upstream to ammonia in the channel was a function of residence time, ammonification rate, direct loads and load composition
![Page 28: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Take home message
The oxygen demand produced from the direct load of dissolved ammonia from the treatment plant could have a greater impact on daily oxygen demand in the channel than the oxidation of organic nitrogen from upstream because of the slow oxidation rate and low reactivity of upstream organic matter
![Page 29: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
![Page 30: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
18-Jul 1-Aug 16-Aug
29-Aug
14-Sep
3-Oct
Date
ch
loro
ph
yll
ug
l -1
Mossdale
Channel Point
Net transport of phytoplankton mass decreased downstream
![Page 31: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Net transport kg d -1
Percent retention
%
Net transport kg d -1
Percent retention
%
Net transport kg d -1
Percent retention
%
Net transport kg d -1
Percent retention
%
Week
3-Jun 49 91 903 50 -61 -17 7489 61
10-Jun 25 89 988 64 72 20 6287 69
1-Jul 8 19 -389 -37 8 1 -206 -1
12-Aug 8 27 -181 -11 418 32 -1166 -11
19-Aug 28 85 1054 77 787 69 8025 73
9-Sep 13 51 791 37 333 44 4166 37
16-Sep 41 77 1226 49 782 50 4638 34
7-Oct 32 47 1112 47 3056 84 10186 52
median 27 64 946 48 375 38 5462 44
10th percentile 8 19 -389 -37 -61 -17 -1166 -11
90th percentile 34 86 1068 54 783 55 7623 63
organic nitrogen ammoniachlorophyll a total BOD
![Page 32: Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081421/56814967550346895db6ba60/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Model residence
time MD
median 10th
percentile90th
percentileWTP
median 10th
percentile90th
percentileSignificant difference
sample size
day percent percent level n
Run 1
1 38 16 52 62 0 72 < 0.01 102
5 49 40 56 51 18 56 ns 20
10 55 42 57 45 29 49 < 0.02 10
15 61 45 61 39 35 46 < 0.04 7
20 58 50 62 42 33 46 < 0.04 5
25 58 56 59 42 38 43 ns 4
Run 2
1 34 6 47 66 0 83 < 0.01 102
5 38 15 47 62 35 70 < 0.01 20
10 43 26 45 57 46 69 < 0.01 10
15 42 31 46 58 46 64 < 0.02 7
20 38 35 45 62 48 63 < 0.05 5
25 41 34 44 59 49 61 ns 4