south african bridge federation 2020 congress cape town 2020 bulletin no. 6.pdfterence reese writes...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: South African Bridge Federation 2020 Congress Cape Town 2020 Bulletin No. 6.pdfTerence Reese writes about a hand in which a player made the contract, missing a difficult, but still](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071509/612d49381ecc515869421830/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
South African Bridge Federation
2020 Congress – Cape Town
BULLETIN #6 Sun 15 March 2020
Compiled by: Neil Hayward
Neville Eber Praises the Stabell Brothers for a Well-Defended Hand
Neville Eber along with Chris Bosenberg, Tim Cope, Glen Holman, Alon
Apteker and Craig Gower, was a member of the South African team in
Shanghai, China which reached the semi-finals of the 2007 Bermuda
Bowl by beating the powerful Italian team, before losing to the USA by a
mere 8 IMPs in the semi-finals.
Although bridge does not receive as much recognition as it deserves in
this country, that was an achievement which filled the bridge-playing
community in South Africa with tremendous pride.
Neville also plays poker and backgammon at a high level. Some people just love stress!
Board: 5 Vul: NS Dealer: S
AKT973 6 QJ75 85
654
QJ8
J983 KT7
AT3 9642
Q62 974 2 AQ542 K8 AKJT3
West North East South
1
Pass 1 Pass 2
Pass 3 Pass 3NT
Pass Pass Pass
This board has, again, been orientated to put declarer in the South seat to produce a
familiar perspective.
Leif Stabell found a brilliant lead: the 5. This lead breaks the communications in spades
between dummy and declarer right away. A suit bid and re-bid with a jump: not many would
even consider that lead, let alone actually choose it.
Winning with the A, Eber led a club to the J, losing to the Q. The T was exited –
another good card – covered by the J. Had the A popped up, Eber was ready to unblock
![Page 2: South African Bridge Federation 2020 Congress Cape Town 2020 Bulletin No. 6.pdfTerence Reese writes about a hand in which a player made the contract, missing a difficult, but still](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071509/612d49381ecc515869421830/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
the K to create an entry to dummy. As you see, this did not happen. The K was cashed,
followed by four clubs, and then the K, won by Leif Stabell. A spade was now led to the
Q, and, the 7 was led back (the T would have been better, especially if the K and J
been interchanged). Stabell had to overtake the 7, playing the 8. Eber now had a “free”
finesse at trick 12.
There are not many bridge hands which are quite as mundane as they might seem. This one,
for example, is more complex than a casual look might suggest. Benito Garozzo once said
that, if playing at the top of his form, he made around seven mistakes per session. Yet you
hear players talk about how they played flawlessly throughout a session. Bridge is so
complex that we cannot see over its horizons to fully appreciate its depth and beauty.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Bridge Humour
Overheard at the bridge club:
We had a 75-percent game last night!
Three out of four opponents thought we were idiots.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Uncharacteristic Modesty – Plus Two Great Punch Lines
Terence Reese writes about a hand in which a player made the contract, missing a difficult,
but still better line. “Despite that,” writes Reese, “nothing was going to prevent him from
telling every bridge player he met for the next few months about his wonderful play. There
are many qualities you need to reach the top at bridge. Modesty is not one of them.”
Reese might have been surprised by this modesty in another player, who wrote: “In a
college dormitory game (at Vanderbilt University) I picked up:
♠ Void ♥ AKQJ109xxx ♦ Void ♣ AKQx.
The player writes: “A manipulated hand, one might think, but I saw the cards being shuffled.
I remember the thirteenth card I picked up: it was the ♥A. I decided the 4th club would be
taken care of one way or another and risked an opening bid of 7♥. Fortunately, Partner held
♣Jx. We were all rotten players, of course, but this deal somehow established my
reputation, because who but an expert would open 7♥?
“Unfortunately, the rest is not exactly history.”
![Page 3: South African Bridge Federation 2020 Congress Cape Town 2020 Bulletin No. 6.pdfTerence Reese writes about a hand in which a player made the contract, missing a difficult, but still](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071509/612d49381ecc515869421830/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Great Play by a Great Player
Oswald Jacoby gave us transfers over a 1NT opening and he also invented
the 2NT game-forcing raise over a major suit opening. He played the hand
below in 1950, declaring a contract of 6 after North’s 1 opening and
East’s overcall of 1, which West raised to a pre-emptive 4. The lead is
the 10. Can you match Ozzie’s line of play?
Ozzie drew trumps, and led a diamond across. Five diamond tricks appear to be in the bag,
until you realise that the fourth round will be have to be won in your hand. When you spot a
problem, you are closer to solving
it. Here, the solution is simple and
elegant. Give them a “free” heart
trick, throwing a diamond. Should
a defender hold Jxx, you have
cleared the blockage. When it
comes to declarer play, the stars
of yesteryear had plenty of class.
They probably burnt less of their
brain power on remembering
intricate systemic bids. The
sequence on the right is too
modern to have been seen in 1950.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Don’t Give an Inch
A long time ago, Brian Keable, playing with Joe Amsbury, an English international, said (after
something went seriously wrong with their defence): “Joe, I was probably 95 percent to
blame.”
Amsbury, with raised eyebrow: “And where exactly do you propose to apportion the other 5
percent?”
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Knot a Good Result
South, writing in the score : “5 Diamonds doubled, played by East, four down vulnerable.
That’s minus 1100.”
North, to East : “You got yourselves in a knot there.”
East : “We certainly did. Our path was paved with nothing but good conventions.”
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
652
Q3
AKQ42
J54
AKQJ83
-
T986
AT3
West North East South
– 1 1 1
Pass 2 Pass 4(a)
Pass 4NT(b) Pass 6(c)
Pass 6 [end]
(a) Shortage (b) Keycard Blackwood
(c) Odd no. of keycards plus a void
![Page 4: South African Bridge Federation 2020 Congress Cape Town 2020 Bulletin No. 6.pdfTerence Reese writes about a hand in which a player made the contract, missing a difficult, but still](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071509/612d49381ecc515869421830/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Did You Know?
The greatest age at which a contestant has won a world
championship in any code is 89. This was the age at which Boris
Schapiro won a world championship. Okay, so it was the world
Seniors Pairs Championship, but it made him a world champion
nevertheless.
Schapiro’s first major success was in the Gold Cup in 1945. He went on to win this trophy
eleven times, his last victory coming at the age of 88 in 1998.
Partnering Terence Reese, he was a member of the British team that won the Bermuda
Bowl in 1955.
Boris Schapiro played in our national congress in the year 2000.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
A Catastrophic Omission
Richard Fleet, an English international, and his wife, Marijke van
Beesten, owned seven cats, named Blackwood, Stayman, Terence,
Boris, Rixi, Branco and Fritzi. If Blackwood or Stayman jumped up
onto the table during the auction, Fleet and his wife had a house rule: they had to use the
convention after which the cat was named during the current auction. On one occasion, two
of their opponents bid to a slam without using Blackwood, missing two aces. The result was
predictably disastrous for them.
Blackwood was soon up on the table, rolling about ecstatically, as if making the point that
they should not have insulted him by breaking the house rule.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
A Peep is Worth Two Finesses
In rubber bridge, which can be a rather coarse game, there is the story
about a player who loved a good peep. He would sway back and forth in his
chair, keen to take full advantage of any evidence that came to light. One of
his opponents, sitting on his right, decided to get his revenge by placing his queen of
diamonds in his heart suit. Having completed his swaying routine, the dodgy operator
finessed the heart jack and immediately placed his hand on the table, claiming 3NT.
Unfortunately for him, his left hand opponent produced the heart queen, completely
unexpectedly, defeating the contract. Peeping Tom just about fell off his chair. He
immediately picked up his glasses and gave them a good clean.
After that incident, he would sway both ways, peeping into each opponent’s hand just to be
sure.
![Page 5: South African Bridge Federation 2020 Congress Cape Town 2020 Bulletin No. 6.pdfTerence Reese writes about a hand in which a player made the contract, missing a difficult, but still](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071509/612d49381ecc515869421830/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
When in Rome .....
At a regional championship in Canada, a local player opened 1, and the partner of the
visiting expert overcalled 2. The third player doubled.
The expert waited for some clarification of the double, but none was forthcoming. After a
while, he turned to the opener and complained, sharp-edged: “At the clubs where I play, we
alert our negative doubles.”
The opener turned to the expert and replied: “At the clubs where I play, we don't play
negative doubles.”
The contract of 2 doubled cost the expert and his partner an unpalatable minus 800.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
The Annual Bridge Club Party
“Ladies and Gentlemen,” called the director at the duplicate bridge club’s annual Christmas
party, “order please. We have a new record. Someone has just scored minus 3400.”
As the triumphant declarer took his bow, a tipsy voice came from the back: “Could he have
made his contract on a different line of play?”
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
And the Teams Championship Winners for 2020 are…
… the STABELL team (Leif-Erik Stabell, Tolle Stabell, Jan Mikkelsen and Sverre Johnsen) who
finished victorious in the head-to-head finale verses the EBER team (Neville Eber, Hennie
Fick, Anders Morath, Sven-Ake Bjerregaard, Val Bloom and Tas Nestoridis).
After agreeing to play a 48-board match, the Stabell team took a convincing early lead
winning the first round 29:8. Not deterred, the Eber team fought back valiantly taking the
second round 43:23 and virtually levelling the match at 55:51 overnight. Anxious to return
to colder climes, the Norwegians stormed ahead in the third round (47:11) increasing their
lead to 102:62. Making up 40 IMPS on 12 boards against the Vikings was never going to be
easy and so it proved to be. Well done to both teams for an enjoyable match played in
excellent spirits and no need for TD rulings.
HEAD-TO-HEAD NATIONAL TEAMS CHAMPIONSHIPS 2020
Score for Round Cumulative Scores
STABELL EBER STABELL EBER Carry Over (from Round Robin) 3 0 3 0
Round 1 (12 Boards) 29 8 32 8
Round 2 (12 Boards) 23 43 55 51 Round 3 (12 Boards) 47 11 102 62
Round 4 (12 Boards) 21 14 123 76
![Page 6: South African Bridge Federation 2020 Congress Cape Town 2020 Bulletin No. 6.pdfTerence Reese writes about a hand in which a player made the contract, missing a difficult, but still](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071509/612d49381ecc515869421830/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
FINAL RESULTS OF PAIRS QUALIFIERS (Page 1 of 3)
![Page 7: South African Bridge Federation 2020 Congress Cape Town 2020 Bulletin No. 6.pdfTerence Reese writes about a hand in which a player made the contract, missing a difficult, but still](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071509/612d49381ecc515869421830/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
FINAL RESULTS OF PAIRS QUALIFIERS (Page 2 of 3)
![Page 8: South African Bridge Federation 2020 Congress Cape Town 2020 Bulletin No. 6.pdfTerence Reese writes about a hand in which a player made the contract, missing a difficult, but still](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071509/612d49381ecc515869421830/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
FINAL RESULTS OF PAIRS QUALIFIERS (Page 3 of 3)
“NO FEAR PAIRS” FINAL RESULTS
Position Partnership Round 1 Round 2 Combined
1 Marilyn Markus & Bernice Kaye x x 59.75%
2 Pamela Murinik & Marcia Randell x x 57.26%
3 Geraldine Jacobs & Maureen Lander x x 57.16%
4= Colleen Frost & Mary Smith x x 52.99%
4= Twiggi Curitz & Andrea Reidy x x 52.99%
No fewer than twenty “fearless” pairs participated in the inaugural NO FEAR PAIRS contest in this
year’s SABF National Congress. Many congratulations to the winners Marilyn and Bernice and to the
runners-up Pamela and Marcia. Commiserations to the third placed partnership of Geraldine and
Maureen who finished a hair’s breadth (0.1%) behind second.