south asia regional initiative/energy course 3.5 stakeholder role in successful regulation, march...
TRANSCRIPT
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
By By
Ali Nawaz MemonAli Nawaz Memon
REGULATION: PURPOSE, REGULATION: PURPOSE, HISTORY, AIMS AND MODELSHISTORY, AIMS AND MODELS
REGULATION: PURPOSE, REGULATION: PURPOSE, HISTORY, AIMS AND MODELSHISTORY, AIMS AND MODELS
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
Need and purpose of regulationNeed and purpose of regulationNeed and purpose of regulationNeed and purpose of regulation
Monopolies must be subject to regulationMonopolies must be subject to regulation Electricity business is a natural Electricity business is a natural
monopolymonopoly- capital intensitycapital intensity- Minimum required economic scaleMinimum required economic scale- Fluctuating demandFluctuating demand- Essential product for communityEssential product for community- Involves direct connection to consumersInvolves direct connection to consumers
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
Potential exploitative power by Potential exploitative power by producerproducerPotential exploitative power by Potential exploitative power by producerproducer
Political and social demand for social control of electricity due to:
- The essential nature of the service- The non-storability of the product- The dependence of the consumer upon
the supplier
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
Regulatory AimsRegulatory Aims
Protect consumers from abuse by firms with substantial market power
Support investment by protecting investors from arbitrary action by public sector
Promote economic efficiency
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
Regulatory ChallengesRegulatory Challenges
Utility prices are political - there are no votes in increasing prices
Investors are aware of political pressures and seek a credible commitment to rules that ensure an opportunity to earn reasonable returns
Long-term nature and large magnitude of required capital require credible commitment, otherwise the cost of capital will be high
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
Types of regulationTypes of regulation
• Different types of regulation – economic– technical
• safety in nuclear units
• waterflow in hydro plants
– environment• emissions
standards• Riparian issues
• Focus on economic regulation– objectives
• what is the public interest
– approaches• how it is done
– structure• how it is organized
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
Objectives of economic regulation
Objectives of economic regulation
• Competition– promote & facilitate competition– promote increased efficiency
• Prices– ensure that suppliers are financially
sound • Quality
– provide sufficient investment in power system
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
Regulatory ModelsRegulatory ModelsRegulatory ModelsRegulatory Models
Basic design questions History of regulatory solutions Models based on industry coverage Price regulation
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
Some Basic Model Designs Questions (1)Some Basic Model Designs Questions (1)
Should the regulatory entity have jurisdiction over one industry, one sector or several sectors?
How much discretion/authority to give to the regulator?
What are possible paths towards setting up a regulatory commission?
What will be role of the line minister in comparison to that of the regulator?
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
Why “independent regulatory agency”?
What should be the start up strategy? Should there be a single regulator or a
commission? Or what should be decision-making structure?
How do you select regulators?
How do you fund the regulatory commission?
Some Basic Model Design Questions (2)Some Basic Model Design Questions (2)
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
History of regulatory solutionsHistory of regulatory solutionsHistory of regulatory solutionsHistory of regulatory solutions
Focus on balancing interests of producers and consumers.
Historically soutions constrained by politics, history, endowments/ resources, technology, and the state of economy.
USA has gone the way of private ownership and minimum state control (?)
UK with more state control?
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
Regulation in relation to ownership Regulation in relation to ownership structuresstructuresRegulation in relation to ownership Regulation in relation to ownership structuresstructures
Entirely publicly owned and hence directly subject to political control and access to funds
Entirely private but regulated A mixed system in which the private
sector is implicitly controlled e.g. by the potential of being taken over by the public sector (case of many developing countries where private sector exists)
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
Regulatory Approaches developed Regulatory Approaches developed todatetodateRegulatory Approaches developed Regulatory Approaches developed todatetodate
Independent regulatory agencies Ministries directly handle most
regulatory responsibilities Ministerial regulatory agencies
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
Independent regulatory agenciesIndependent regulatory agenciesIndependent regulatory agenciesIndependent regulatory agencies
Independent regulatory agencies separate from the ministry have been established in Australia, Canada, Finland, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, UK, and the US and are planned in Denmark and France.
These agencies often cover both gas and electricity.
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
Independent regulatory agencies (2)Independent regulatory agencies (2)Independent regulatory agencies (2)Independent regulatory agencies (2)
They are governed by a collegial board, and operate on the basis of public consultation and other transparency enhancing procedures.
In countries with a federal organisation there are often regulators at the federal and state level with the former specialising in wholesale electricity trade and transmission, and the latter concentrating on retail trade and distribution.
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
Ministries directly handle most Ministries directly handle most regulatory responsibilitiesregulatory responsibilitiesMinistries directly handle most Ministries directly handle most regulatory responsibilitiesregulatory responsibilities
This is the approach currently taken in Austria, Belgium, Germany, Greece, Japan, Luxembourg, New Zealand, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey.
In three of these countries – Belgium, Luxembourg and Spain- an independent advisory agency assists the ministry.
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
Ministerial regulatory agenciesMinisterial regulatory agenciesMinisterial regulatory agenciesMinisterial regulatory agencies
These are organizations subordinated to the ministry but set to operate autonomously in the day-to-day management of regulatory affairs. The scope of their activity is similar to that of independent agencies. This is the approach adopted in Hungary, The Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden.
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
Other Regulatory Options
Industry Coverage• Industry specific- separate agency to deal with
each sector e.g. power, water, gas, telecommunication (UK and Argentina)
• Sector wide—one agency for each broadly defined sector e.g. energy sector to include power, gas (FERC in USA; Hungary ;Columbia)
• Multi-sector – single agency for all or most utility industries (electricity, water, gas, telecoms.) e.g. state level regulators (Brazil, USA); national regulators (Jamaica, Costa Rica, Panama)
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
Price RegulationPrice Regulation
Approach
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
Objectives of Price Regulation
• Recovery of costs • Fostering climate conducive to investment• Consideration of government policy
– subsidies, job growth• External economic considerations
– inflation• Costs beyond reasonable technical and
commercial standards are not borne by customers
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
Principles of Rate MakingRate of Return
• Traditional US system• Prices based on historic test year• Prices set to allow profits for rate of return• Costs assessed on prudence• Investments assessed on “used and useful”• Profit volatility minimized• Prices stable
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
Rate-of-return Regulation (USA)Rate-of-return Regulation (USA)Rate-of-return Regulation (USA)Rate-of-return Regulation (USA)
This form of regulation provides full recovery
of company’s all reasonably incurred investments through rate application.
The basic structure of rate of return regulation
is that the firm’s prices are frequently set, typically each year, to maintain a given rate of return on capital employed.
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
Price-cap Regulation (UK)Price-cap Regulation (UK)Price-cap Regulation (UK)Price-cap Regulation (UK)
Through this form of economic regulation, the prices are set in relation to movements in some general price indicator. It is further adjusted on the basis of expected productivity improvements of the industry.
RPI-X RPI= Regional Price Index x= Expected productivity improvement
S
OU
TH
AS
IA R
EG
ION
AL
IN
ITIA
TIV
E/E
NE
RG
Y
Course 3.5 Stakeholder Role in Successful Regulation, March 4-8,2002, Bentota, Sri Lanka
Other Ratemaking Methods
• 1) Yard-stick Regulation (tariff adjustment based on results of comparable utilities)
• 2) Conduct Regulation (tariff adjustment granted on basis of agreed conduct in relations to operating cost, investments etc)
• 3) Revenue caps• 4) Trigger points for incentives