National review and accountability mechanisms

Sowmya Kadandale Department for Health Systems Policies amp Workforce

Review mechanisms

bull Opportunity to assess

ndash progress achieved on agreed goals specific

objectives milestones and recommendations from

earlier reviews

ndash performance against the indicators that are part of

the monitoring or results framework

bull Centre of accountability - bring together

beneficiaries MoH partners civil society and all

relevant stakeholders

ndash Ensures mutual accountability between all groups

Review mechanisms

bull Build on sub-sectoralnational reviews get the global

picture

bull Reviews can take several forms

bull RMNCH can ensure their goals are included by providing

coherent inputs across the national policy and

performance review processes

Review mechanisms ndash CAF tool

This section of the tool seeks to understand where the country stands on some key aspects of national policy process like - engagement of a broad range of stakeholders - reviews synthesis amp analysis of information on health

system and population health including RMNCH - prioritising amp planning using review findings to

prioritise and to plan - mutual accountability agreements (compacts) to

back one national plan and process

How does it link together

Epidemiological surveillance

National health information system

Monitoring and evaluation framework

National health sector strategic plan

Health sector reviews

ACCOUNTABILITY

Sectoral reforms and actions

CO

IA is a to

ol th

at reinfo

rces the d

ifferent asp

ect of th

e info

rmatio

n ch

ain

Maternal deaths

Civil registration vital statistics

Compacts

Primary health care

National health accounts

Review mechanisms ndash CAF tool

Four sections in the tool

bull Reviews andor other mechanisms

bull Synthesis of information

bull From review to planning

bull Compactsother formal agreements

Reviews andor other mechanisms

Regular review mechanisms

bull What are the types of reviews in the country ndash

sectoral national sub-national programmatic

independent

bull How often are the reviews held ndash annual mid-

term review final

Relevant stakeholders

bull Who are the relevant stakeholders in the review

o Citizens professional associations different sectors active in health

(water and sanitation education transport agriculture women

finance) civil society private sector parliamentarians research

institutes non-governmental organizations decentralized and local

governments bilateral and multilateral agencies

bull Is there a mapping of the different stakeholders at the start of

the review process

bull Are the relevant stakeholders involved in all the phases of the

review process (preparation review development of an action

plan implementation of recommendations MampE of the

recommendations)

Civil society organization are important

to the review progress and performance

bull Which categories of civil society organizations

participate in the review

bull What role do they play

Synthesis of information

Reviews are based on a synthesis of

quality data

bull Is there a national annual assessment of the

quality of the data

bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at

regionsprovinces districts amp community levels

bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active

information

Programme-specific review are aligned with the

annual sector review and the results decisions

are incorporated

bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific

programmes

bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized

to the timing of the annual sector

bull Are the results of reviews of specific

programmes discussed and used to review the

health sector

From review to planning

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

bull What types of reports are produced by the review

bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from

the reviews

bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the

results of the reviews for health planning

bull What types of plans are developed based on review

reports

bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on

the results of the review

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

Results achieved

bull How was the money spent

bull Have policies changed

bull Were recommendations implemented as intended

bull Has access to services improved

bull Has the quality of services improved

bull Has service utilization improved

bull Has coverage of interventions improved

bull Risk behaviors are they rare

bull Have health outcomes and equity improved

bull Do the services meet the needs of the population

bull Is the population protected from financial risks

Compactsother formal agreements

Country compactsformal arrangements

bull Codify government and development partner

commitments on ways of working to improve

health outcomes

ndash improve partner alignment with country systems

ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts

ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid

ndash reduce transaction costs

ndash increase mutual accountability

Key elements of a country compact

bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners

bull Aid management modalities

bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress

Some useful links

bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet

bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg

bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr

ameworksaspx

bull httpwwwetc-

crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28

124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0

Review mechanisms

bull Opportunity to assess

ndash progress achieved on agreed goals specific

objectives milestones and recommendations from

earlier reviews

ndash performance against the indicators that are part of

the monitoring or results framework

bull Centre of accountability - bring together

beneficiaries MoH partners civil society and all

relevant stakeholders

ndash Ensures mutual accountability between all groups

Review mechanisms

bull Build on sub-sectoralnational reviews get the global

picture

bull Reviews can take several forms

bull RMNCH can ensure their goals are included by providing

coherent inputs across the national policy and

performance review processes

Review mechanisms ndash CAF tool

This section of the tool seeks to understand where the country stands on some key aspects of national policy process like - engagement of a broad range of stakeholders - reviews synthesis amp analysis of information on health

system and population health including RMNCH - prioritising amp planning using review findings to

prioritise and to plan - mutual accountability agreements (compacts) to

back one national plan and process

How does it link together

Epidemiological surveillance

National health information system

Monitoring and evaluation framework

National health sector strategic plan

Health sector reviews

ACCOUNTABILITY

Sectoral reforms and actions

CO

IA is a to

ol th

at reinfo

rces the d

ifferent asp

ect of th

e info

rmatio

n ch

ain

Maternal deaths

Civil registration vital statistics

Compacts

Primary health care

National health accounts

Review mechanisms ndash CAF tool

Four sections in the tool

bull Reviews andor other mechanisms

bull Synthesis of information

bull From review to planning

bull Compactsother formal agreements

Reviews andor other mechanisms

Regular review mechanisms

bull What are the types of reviews in the country ndash

sectoral national sub-national programmatic

independent

bull How often are the reviews held ndash annual mid-

term review final

Relevant stakeholders

bull Who are the relevant stakeholders in the review

o Citizens professional associations different sectors active in health

(water and sanitation education transport agriculture women

finance) civil society private sector parliamentarians research

institutes non-governmental organizations decentralized and local

governments bilateral and multilateral agencies

bull Is there a mapping of the different stakeholders at the start of

the review process

bull Are the relevant stakeholders involved in all the phases of the

review process (preparation review development of an action

plan implementation of recommendations MampE of the

recommendations)

Civil society organization are important

to the review progress and performance

bull Which categories of civil society organizations

participate in the review

bull What role do they play

Synthesis of information

Reviews are based on a synthesis of

quality data

bull Is there a national annual assessment of the

quality of the data

bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at

regionsprovinces districts amp community levels

bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active

information

Programme-specific review are aligned with the

annual sector review and the results decisions

are incorporated

bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific

programmes

bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized

to the timing of the annual sector

bull Are the results of reviews of specific

programmes discussed and used to review the

health sector

From review to planning

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

bull What types of reports are produced by the review

bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from

the reviews

bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the

results of the reviews for health planning

bull What types of plans are developed based on review

reports

bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on

the results of the review

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

Results achieved

bull How was the money spent

bull Have policies changed

bull Were recommendations implemented as intended

bull Has access to services improved

bull Has the quality of services improved

bull Has service utilization improved

bull Has coverage of interventions improved

bull Risk behaviors are they rare

bull Have health outcomes and equity improved

bull Do the services meet the needs of the population

bull Is the population protected from financial risks

Compactsother formal agreements

Country compactsformal arrangements

bull Codify government and development partner

commitments on ways of working to improve

health outcomes

ndash improve partner alignment with country systems

ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts

ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid

ndash reduce transaction costs

ndash increase mutual accountability

Key elements of a country compact

bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners

bull Aid management modalities

bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress

Some useful links

bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet

bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg

bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr

ameworksaspx

bull httpwwwetc-

crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28

124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0

Review mechanisms

bull Build on sub-sectoralnational reviews get the global

picture

bull Reviews can take several forms

bull RMNCH can ensure their goals are included by providing

coherent inputs across the national policy and

performance review processes

Review mechanisms ndash CAF tool

This section of the tool seeks to understand where the country stands on some key aspects of national policy process like - engagement of a broad range of stakeholders - reviews synthesis amp analysis of information on health

system and population health including RMNCH - prioritising amp planning using review findings to

prioritise and to plan - mutual accountability agreements (compacts) to

back one national plan and process

How does it link together

Epidemiological surveillance

National health information system

Monitoring and evaluation framework

National health sector strategic plan

Health sector reviews

ACCOUNTABILITY

Sectoral reforms and actions

CO

IA is a to

ol th

at reinfo

rces the d

ifferent asp

ect of th

e info

rmatio

n ch

ain

Maternal deaths

Civil registration vital statistics

Compacts

Primary health care

National health accounts

Review mechanisms ndash CAF tool

Four sections in the tool

bull Reviews andor other mechanisms

bull Synthesis of information

bull From review to planning

bull Compactsother formal agreements

Reviews andor other mechanisms

Regular review mechanisms

bull What are the types of reviews in the country ndash

sectoral national sub-national programmatic

independent

bull How often are the reviews held ndash annual mid-

term review final

Relevant stakeholders

bull Who are the relevant stakeholders in the review

o Citizens professional associations different sectors active in health

(water and sanitation education transport agriculture women

finance) civil society private sector parliamentarians research

institutes non-governmental organizations decentralized and local

governments bilateral and multilateral agencies

bull Is there a mapping of the different stakeholders at the start of

the review process

bull Are the relevant stakeholders involved in all the phases of the

review process (preparation review development of an action

plan implementation of recommendations MampE of the

recommendations)

Civil society organization are important

to the review progress and performance

bull Which categories of civil society organizations

participate in the review

bull What role do they play

Synthesis of information

Reviews are based on a synthesis of

quality data

bull Is there a national annual assessment of the

quality of the data

bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at

regionsprovinces districts amp community levels

bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active

information

Programme-specific review are aligned with the

annual sector review and the results decisions

are incorporated

bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific

programmes

bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized

to the timing of the annual sector

bull Are the results of reviews of specific

programmes discussed and used to review the

health sector

From review to planning

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

bull What types of reports are produced by the review

bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from

the reviews

bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the

results of the reviews for health planning

bull What types of plans are developed based on review

reports

bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on

the results of the review

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

Results achieved

bull How was the money spent

bull Have policies changed

bull Were recommendations implemented as intended

bull Has access to services improved

bull Has the quality of services improved

bull Has service utilization improved

bull Has coverage of interventions improved

bull Risk behaviors are they rare

bull Have health outcomes and equity improved

bull Do the services meet the needs of the population

bull Is the population protected from financial risks

Compactsother formal agreements

Country compactsformal arrangements

bull Codify government and development partner

commitments on ways of working to improve

health outcomes

ndash improve partner alignment with country systems

ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts

ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid

ndash reduce transaction costs

ndash increase mutual accountability

Key elements of a country compact

bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners

bull Aid management modalities

bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress

Some useful links

bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet

bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg

bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr

ameworksaspx

bull httpwwwetc-

crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28

124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0

Review mechanisms ndash CAF tool

This section of the tool seeks to understand where the country stands on some key aspects of national policy process like - engagement of a broad range of stakeholders - reviews synthesis amp analysis of information on health

system and population health including RMNCH - prioritising amp planning using review findings to

prioritise and to plan - mutual accountability agreements (compacts) to

back one national plan and process

How does it link together

Epidemiological surveillance

National health information system

Monitoring and evaluation framework

National health sector strategic plan

Health sector reviews

ACCOUNTABILITY

Sectoral reforms and actions

CO

IA is a to

ol th

at reinfo

rces the d

ifferent asp

ect of th

e info

rmatio

n ch

ain

Maternal deaths

Civil registration vital statistics

Compacts

Primary health care

National health accounts

Review mechanisms ndash CAF tool

Four sections in the tool

bull Reviews andor other mechanisms

bull Synthesis of information

bull From review to planning

bull Compactsother formal agreements

Reviews andor other mechanisms

Regular review mechanisms

bull What are the types of reviews in the country ndash

sectoral national sub-national programmatic

independent

bull How often are the reviews held ndash annual mid-

term review final

Relevant stakeholders

bull Who are the relevant stakeholders in the review

o Citizens professional associations different sectors active in health

(water and sanitation education transport agriculture women

finance) civil society private sector parliamentarians research

institutes non-governmental organizations decentralized and local

governments bilateral and multilateral agencies

bull Is there a mapping of the different stakeholders at the start of

the review process

bull Are the relevant stakeholders involved in all the phases of the

review process (preparation review development of an action

plan implementation of recommendations MampE of the

recommendations)

Civil society organization are important

to the review progress and performance

bull Which categories of civil society organizations

participate in the review

bull What role do they play

Synthesis of information

Reviews are based on a synthesis of

quality data

bull Is there a national annual assessment of the

quality of the data

bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at

regionsprovinces districts amp community levels

bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active

information

Programme-specific review are aligned with the

annual sector review and the results decisions

are incorporated

bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific

programmes

bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized

to the timing of the annual sector

bull Are the results of reviews of specific

programmes discussed and used to review the

health sector

From review to planning

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

bull What types of reports are produced by the review

bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from

the reviews

bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the

results of the reviews for health planning

bull What types of plans are developed based on review

reports

bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on

the results of the review

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

Results achieved

bull How was the money spent

bull Have policies changed

bull Were recommendations implemented as intended

bull Has access to services improved

bull Has the quality of services improved

bull Has service utilization improved

bull Has coverage of interventions improved

bull Risk behaviors are they rare

bull Have health outcomes and equity improved

bull Do the services meet the needs of the population

bull Is the population protected from financial risks

Compactsother formal agreements

Country compactsformal arrangements

bull Codify government and development partner

commitments on ways of working to improve

health outcomes

ndash improve partner alignment with country systems

ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts

ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid

ndash reduce transaction costs

ndash increase mutual accountability

Key elements of a country compact

bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners

bull Aid management modalities

bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress

Some useful links

bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet

bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg

bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr

ameworksaspx

bull httpwwwetc-

crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28

124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0

How does it link together

Epidemiological surveillance

National health information system

Monitoring and evaluation framework

National health sector strategic plan

Health sector reviews

ACCOUNTABILITY

Sectoral reforms and actions

CO

IA is a to

ol th

at reinfo

rces the d

ifferent asp

ect of th

e info

rmatio

n ch

ain

Maternal deaths

Civil registration vital statistics

Compacts

Primary health care

National health accounts

Review mechanisms ndash CAF tool

Four sections in the tool

bull Reviews andor other mechanisms

bull Synthesis of information

bull From review to planning

bull Compactsother formal agreements

Reviews andor other mechanisms

Regular review mechanisms

bull What are the types of reviews in the country ndash

sectoral national sub-national programmatic

independent

bull How often are the reviews held ndash annual mid-

term review final

Relevant stakeholders

bull Who are the relevant stakeholders in the review

o Citizens professional associations different sectors active in health

(water and sanitation education transport agriculture women

finance) civil society private sector parliamentarians research

institutes non-governmental organizations decentralized and local

governments bilateral and multilateral agencies

bull Is there a mapping of the different stakeholders at the start of

the review process

bull Are the relevant stakeholders involved in all the phases of the

review process (preparation review development of an action

plan implementation of recommendations MampE of the

recommendations)

Civil society organization are important

to the review progress and performance

bull Which categories of civil society organizations

participate in the review

bull What role do they play

Synthesis of information

Reviews are based on a synthesis of

quality data

bull Is there a national annual assessment of the

quality of the data

bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at

regionsprovinces districts amp community levels

bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active

information

Programme-specific review are aligned with the

annual sector review and the results decisions

are incorporated

bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific

programmes

bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized

to the timing of the annual sector

bull Are the results of reviews of specific

programmes discussed and used to review the

health sector

From review to planning

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

bull What types of reports are produced by the review

bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from

the reviews

bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the

results of the reviews for health planning

bull What types of plans are developed based on review

reports

bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on

the results of the review

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

Results achieved

bull How was the money spent

bull Have policies changed

bull Were recommendations implemented as intended

bull Has access to services improved

bull Has the quality of services improved

bull Has service utilization improved

bull Has coverage of interventions improved

bull Risk behaviors are they rare

bull Have health outcomes and equity improved

bull Do the services meet the needs of the population

bull Is the population protected from financial risks

Compactsother formal agreements

Country compactsformal arrangements

bull Codify government and development partner

commitments on ways of working to improve

health outcomes

ndash improve partner alignment with country systems

ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts

ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid

ndash reduce transaction costs

ndash increase mutual accountability

Key elements of a country compact

bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners

bull Aid management modalities

bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress

Some useful links

bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet

bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg

bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr

ameworksaspx

bull httpwwwetc-

crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28

124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0

Review mechanisms ndash CAF tool

Four sections in the tool

bull Reviews andor other mechanisms

bull Synthesis of information

bull From review to planning

bull Compactsother formal agreements

Reviews andor other mechanisms

Regular review mechanisms

bull What are the types of reviews in the country ndash

sectoral national sub-national programmatic

independent

bull How often are the reviews held ndash annual mid-

term review final

Relevant stakeholders

bull Who are the relevant stakeholders in the review

o Citizens professional associations different sectors active in health

(water and sanitation education transport agriculture women

finance) civil society private sector parliamentarians research

institutes non-governmental organizations decentralized and local

governments bilateral and multilateral agencies

bull Is there a mapping of the different stakeholders at the start of

the review process

bull Are the relevant stakeholders involved in all the phases of the

review process (preparation review development of an action

plan implementation of recommendations MampE of the

recommendations)

Civil society organization are important

to the review progress and performance

bull Which categories of civil society organizations

participate in the review

bull What role do they play

Synthesis of information

Reviews are based on a synthesis of

quality data

bull Is there a national annual assessment of the

quality of the data

bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at

regionsprovinces districts amp community levels

bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active

information

Programme-specific review are aligned with the

annual sector review and the results decisions

are incorporated

bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific

programmes

bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized

to the timing of the annual sector

bull Are the results of reviews of specific

programmes discussed and used to review the

health sector

From review to planning

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

bull What types of reports are produced by the review

bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from

the reviews

bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the

results of the reviews for health planning

bull What types of plans are developed based on review

reports

bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on

the results of the review

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

Results achieved

bull How was the money spent

bull Have policies changed

bull Were recommendations implemented as intended

bull Has access to services improved

bull Has the quality of services improved

bull Has service utilization improved

bull Has coverage of interventions improved

bull Risk behaviors are they rare

bull Have health outcomes and equity improved

bull Do the services meet the needs of the population

bull Is the population protected from financial risks

Compactsother formal agreements

Country compactsformal arrangements

bull Codify government and development partner

commitments on ways of working to improve

health outcomes

ndash improve partner alignment with country systems

ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts

ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid

ndash reduce transaction costs

ndash increase mutual accountability

Key elements of a country compact

bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners

bull Aid management modalities

bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress

Some useful links

bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet

bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg

bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr

ameworksaspx

bull httpwwwetc-

crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28

124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0

Reviews andor other mechanisms

Regular review mechanisms

bull What are the types of reviews in the country ndash

sectoral national sub-national programmatic

independent

bull How often are the reviews held ndash annual mid-

term review final

Relevant stakeholders

bull Who are the relevant stakeholders in the review

o Citizens professional associations different sectors active in health

(water and sanitation education transport agriculture women

finance) civil society private sector parliamentarians research

institutes non-governmental organizations decentralized and local

governments bilateral and multilateral agencies

bull Is there a mapping of the different stakeholders at the start of

the review process

bull Are the relevant stakeholders involved in all the phases of the

review process (preparation review development of an action

plan implementation of recommendations MampE of the

recommendations)

Civil society organization are important

to the review progress and performance

bull Which categories of civil society organizations

participate in the review

bull What role do they play

Synthesis of information

Reviews are based on a synthesis of

quality data

bull Is there a national annual assessment of the

quality of the data

bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at

regionsprovinces districts amp community levels

bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active

information

Programme-specific review are aligned with the

annual sector review and the results decisions

are incorporated

bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific

programmes

bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized

to the timing of the annual sector

bull Are the results of reviews of specific

programmes discussed and used to review the

health sector

From review to planning

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

bull What types of reports are produced by the review

bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from

the reviews

bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the

results of the reviews for health planning

bull What types of plans are developed based on review

reports

bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on

the results of the review

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

Results achieved

bull How was the money spent

bull Have policies changed

bull Were recommendations implemented as intended

bull Has access to services improved

bull Has the quality of services improved

bull Has service utilization improved

bull Has coverage of interventions improved

bull Risk behaviors are they rare

bull Have health outcomes and equity improved

bull Do the services meet the needs of the population

bull Is the population protected from financial risks

Compactsother formal agreements

Country compactsformal arrangements

bull Codify government and development partner

commitments on ways of working to improve

health outcomes

ndash improve partner alignment with country systems

ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts

ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid

ndash reduce transaction costs

ndash increase mutual accountability

Key elements of a country compact

bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners

bull Aid management modalities

bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress

Some useful links

bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet

bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg

bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr

ameworksaspx

bull httpwwwetc-

crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28

124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0

Regular review mechanisms

bull What are the types of reviews in the country ndash

sectoral national sub-national programmatic

independent

bull How often are the reviews held ndash annual mid-

term review final

Relevant stakeholders

bull Who are the relevant stakeholders in the review

o Citizens professional associations different sectors active in health

(water and sanitation education transport agriculture women

finance) civil society private sector parliamentarians research

institutes non-governmental organizations decentralized and local

governments bilateral and multilateral agencies

bull Is there a mapping of the different stakeholders at the start of

the review process

bull Are the relevant stakeholders involved in all the phases of the

review process (preparation review development of an action

plan implementation of recommendations MampE of the

recommendations)

Civil society organization are important

to the review progress and performance

bull Which categories of civil society organizations

participate in the review

bull What role do they play

Synthesis of information

Reviews are based on a synthesis of

quality data

bull Is there a national annual assessment of the

quality of the data

bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at

regionsprovinces districts amp community levels

bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active

information

Programme-specific review are aligned with the

annual sector review and the results decisions

are incorporated

bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific

programmes

bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized

to the timing of the annual sector

bull Are the results of reviews of specific

programmes discussed and used to review the

health sector

From review to planning

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

bull What types of reports are produced by the review

bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from

the reviews

bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the

results of the reviews for health planning

bull What types of plans are developed based on review

reports

bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on

the results of the review

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

Results achieved

bull How was the money spent

bull Have policies changed

bull Were recommendations implemented as intended

bull Has access to services improved

bull Has the quality of services improved

bull Has service utilization improved

bull Has coverage of interventions improved

bull Risk behaviors are they rare

bull Have health outcomes and equity improved

bull Do the services meet the needs of the population

bull Is the population protected from financial risks

Compactsother formal agreements

Country compactsformal arrangements

bull Codify government and development partner

commitments on ways of working to improve

health outcomes

ndash improve partner alignment with country systems

ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts

ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid

ndash reduce transaction costs

ndash increase mutual accountability

Key elements of a country compact

bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners

bull Aid management modalities

bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress

Some useful links

bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet

bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg

bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr

ameworksaspx

bull httpwwwetc-

crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28

124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0

Relevant stakeholders

bull Who are the relevant stakeholders in the review

o Citizens professional associations different sectors active in health

(water and sanitation education transport agriculture women

finance) civil society private sector parliamentarians research

institutes non-governmental organizations decentralized and local

governments bilateral and multilateral agencies

bull Is there a mapping of the different stakeholders at the start of

the review process

bull Are the relevant stakeholders involved in all the phases of the

review process (preparation review development of an action

plan implementation of recommendations MampE of the

recommendations)

Civil society organization are important

to the review progress and performance

bull Which categories of civil society organizations

participate in the review

bull What role do they play

Synthesis of information

Reviews are based on a synthesis of

quality data

bull Is there a national annual assessment of the

quality of the data

bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at

regionsprovinces districts amp community levels

bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active

information

Programme-specific review are aligned with the

annual sector review and the results decisions

are incorporated

bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific

programmes

bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized

to the timing of the annual sector

bull Are the results of reviews of specific

programmes discussed and used to review the

health sector

From review to planning

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

bull What types of reports are produced by the review

bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from

the reviews

bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the

results of the reviews for health planning

bull What types of plans are developed based on review

reports

bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on

the results of the review

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

Results achieved

bull How was the money spent

bull Have policies changed

bull Were recommendations implemented as intended

bull Has access to services improved

bull Has the quality of services improved

bull Has service utilization improved

bull Has coverage of interventions improved

bull Risk behaviors are they rare

bull Have health outcomes and equity improved

bull Do the services meet the needs of the population

bull Is the population protected from financial risks

Compactsother formal agreements

Country compactsformal arrangements

bull Codify government and development partner

commitments on ways of working to improve

health outcomes

ndash improve partner alignment with country systems

ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts

ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid

ndash reduce transaction costs

ndash increase mutual accountability

Key elements of a country compact

bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners

bull Aid management modalities

bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress

Some useful links

bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet

bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg

bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr

ameworksaspx

bull httpwwwetc-

crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28

124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0

Civil society organization are important

to the review progress and performance

bull Which categories of civil society organizations

participate in the review

bull What role do they play

Synthesis of information

Reviews are based on a synthesis of

quality data

bull Is there a national annual assessment of the

quality of the data

bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at

regionsprovinces districts amp community levels

bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active

information

Programme-specific review are aligned with the

annual sector review and the results decisions

are incorporated

bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific

programmes

bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized

to the timing of the annual sector

bull Are the results of reviews of specific

programmes discussed and used to review the

health sector

From review to planning

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

bull What types of reports are produced by the review

bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from

the reviews

bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the

results of the reviews for health planning

bull What types of plans are developed based on review

reports

bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on

the results of the review

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

Results achieved

bull How was the money spent

bull Have policies changed

bull Were recommendations implemented as intended

bull Has access to services improved

bull Has the quality of services improved

bull Has service utilization improved

bull Has coverage of interventions improved

bull Risk behaviors are they rare

bull Have health outcomes and equity improved

bull Do the services meet the needs of the population

bull Is the population protected from financial risks

Compactsother formal agreements

Country compactsformal arrangements

bull Codify government and development partner

commitments on ways of working to improve

health outcomes

ndash improve partner alignment with country systems

ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts

ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid

ndash reduce transaction costs

ndash increase mutual accountability

Key elements of a country compact

bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners

bull Aid management modalities

bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress

Some useful links

bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet

bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg

bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr

ameworksaspx

bull httpwwwetc-

crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28

124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0

Synthesis of information

Reviews are based on a synthesis of

quality data

bull Is there a national annual assessment of the

quality of the data

bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at

regionsprovinces districts amp community levels

bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active

information

Programme-specific review are aligned with the

annual sector review and the results decisions

are incorporated

bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific

programmes

bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized

to the timing of the annual sector

bull Are the results of reviews of specific

programmes discussed and used to review the

health sector

From review to planning

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

bull What types of reports are produced by the review

bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from

the reviews

bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the

results of the reviews for health planning

bull What types of plans are developed based on review

reports

bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on

the results of the review

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

Results achieved

bull How was the money spent

bull Have policies changed

bull Were recommendations implemented as intended

bull Has access to services improved

bull Has the quality of services improved

bull Has service utilization improved

bull Has coverage of interventions improved

bull Risk behaviors are they rare

bull Have health outcomes and equity improved

bull Do the services meet the needs of the population

bull Is the population protected from financial risks

Compactsother formal agreements

Country compactsformal arrangements

bull Codify government and development partner

commitments on ways of working to improve

health outcomes

ndash improve partner alignment with country systems

ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts

ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid

ndash reduce transaction costs

ndash increase mutual accountability

Key elements of a country compact

bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners

bull Aid management modalities

bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress

Some useful links

bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet

bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg

bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr

ameworksaspx

bull httpwwwetc-

crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28

124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0

Reviews are based on a synthesis of

quality data

bull Is there a national annual assessment of the

quality of the data

bull Sub-national level - are there annual reviews at

regionsprovinces districts amp community levels

bull Is there a mechanism for obtaining retro-active

information

Programme-specific review are aligned with the

annual sector review and the results decisions

are incorporated

bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific

programmes

bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized

to the timing of the annual sector

bull Are the results of reviews of specific

programmes discussed and used to review the

health sector

From review to planning

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

bull What types of reports are produced by the review

bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from

the reviews

bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the

results of the reviews for health planning

bull What types of plans are developed based on review

reports

bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on

the results of the review

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

Results achieved

bull How was the money spent

bull Have policies changed

bull Were recommendations implemented as intended

bull Has access to services improved

bull Has the quality of services improved

bull Has service utilization improved

bull Has coverage of interventions improved

bull Risk behaviors are they rare

bull Have health outcomes and equity improved

bull Do the services meet the needs of the population

bull Is the population protected from financial risks

Compactsother formal agreements

Country compactsformal arrangements

bull Codify government and development partner

commitments on ways of working to improve

health outcomes

ndash improve partner alignment with country systems

ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts

ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid

ndash reduce transaction costs

ndash increase mutual accountability

Key elements of a country compact

bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners

bull Aid management modalities

bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress

Some useful links

bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet

bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg

bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr

ameworksaspx

bull httpwwwetc-

crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28

124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0

Programme-specific review are aligned with the

annual sector review and the results decisions

are incorporated

bull What is the frequency of reviews of specific

programmes

bull Is the timing of programme review harmonized

to the timing of the annual sector

bull Are the results of reviews of specific

programmes discussed and used to review the

health sector

From review to planning

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

bull What types of reports are produced by the review

bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from

the reviews

bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the

results of the reviews for health planning

bull What types of plans are developed based on review

reports

bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on

the results of the review

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

Results achieved

bull How was the money spent

bull Have policies changed

bull Were recommendations implemented as intended

bull Has access to services improved

bull Has the quality of services improved

bull Has service utilization improved

bull Has coverage of interventions improved

bull Risk behaviors are they rare

bull Have health outcomes and equity improved

bull Do the services meet the needs of the population

bull Is the population protected from financial risks

Compactsother formal agreements

Country compactsformal arrangements

bull Codify government and development partner

commitments on ways of working to improve

health outcomes

ndash improve partner alignment with country systems

ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts

ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid

ndash reduce transaction costs

ndash increase mutual accountability

Key elements of a country compact

bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners

bull Aid management modalities

bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress

Some useful links

bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet

bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg

bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr

ameworksaspx

bull httpwwwetc-

crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28

124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0

From review to planning

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

bull What types of reports are produced by the review

bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from

the reviews

bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the

results of the reviews for health planning

bull What types of plans are developed based on review

reports

bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on

the results of the review

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

Results achieved

bull How was the money spent

bull Have policies changed

bull Were recommendations implemented as intended

bull Has access to services improved

bull Has the quality of services improved

bull Has service utilization improved

bull Has coverage of interventions improved

bull Risk behaviors are they rare

bull Have health outcomes and equity improved

bull Do the services meet the needs of the population

bull Is the population protected from financial risks

Compactsother formal agreements

Country compactsformal arrangements

bull Codify government and development partner

commitments on ways of working to improve

health outcomes

ndash improve partner alignment with country systems

ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts

ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid

ndash reduce transaction costs

ndash increase mutual accountability

Key elements of a country compact

bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners

bull Aid management modalities

bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress

Some useful links

bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet

bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg

bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr

ameworksaspx

bull httpwwwetc-

crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28

124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

bull What types of reports are produced by the review

bull Is there a mechanism for synthesis of dataresults from

the reviews

bull What national mechanisms are in place to use the

results of the reviews for health planning

bull What types of plans are developed based on review

reports

bull Is there a mechanism for allocating resources based on

the results of the review

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

Results achieved

bull How was the money spent

bull Have policies changed

bull Were recommendations implemented as intended

bull Has access to services improved

bull Has the quality of services improved

bull Has service utilization improved

bull Has coverage of interventions improved

bull Risk behaviors are they rare

bull Have health outcomes and equity improved

bull Do the services meet the needs of the population

bull Is the population protected from financial risks

Compactsother formal agreements

Country compactsformal arrangements

bull Codify government and development partner

commitments on ways of working to improve

health outcomes

ndash improve partner alignment with country systems

ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts

ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid

ndash reduce transaction costs

ndash increase mutual accountability

Key elements of a country compact

bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners

bull Aid management modalities

bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress

Some useful links

bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet

bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg

bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr

ameworksaspx

bull httpwwwetc-

crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28

124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0

The results of the review meetings are

widely used in the planning process

Results achieved

bull How was the money spent

bull Have policies changed

bull Were recommendations implemented as intended

bull Has access to services improved

bull Has the quality of services improved

bull Has service utilization improved

bull Has coverage of interventions improved

bull Risk behaviors are they rare

bull Have health outcomes and equity improved

bull Do the services meet the needs of the population

bull Is the population protected from financial risks

Compactsother formal agreements

Country compactsformal arrangements

bull Codify government and development partner

commitments on ways of working to improve

health outcomes

ndash improve partner alignment with country systems

ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts

ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid

ndash reduce transaction costs

ndash increase mutual accountability

Key elements of a country compact

bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners

bull Aid management modalities

bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress

Some useful links

bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet

bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg

bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr

ameworksaspx

bull httpwwwetc-

crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28

124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0

Compactsother formal agreements

Country compactsformal arrangements

bull Codify government and development partner

commitments on ways of working to improve

health outcomes

ndash improve partner alignment with country systems

ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts

ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid

ndash reduce transaction costs

ndash increase mutual accountability

Key elements of a country compact

bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners

bull Aid management modalities

bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress

Some useful links

bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet

bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg

bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr

ameworksaspx

bull httpwwwetc-

crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28

124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0

Country compactsformal arrangements

bull Codify government and development partner

commitments on ways of working to improve

health outcomes

ndash improve partner alignment with country systems

ndash bring new partners into health sector coordination efforts

ndash address the fragmentation and volatility of health aid

ndash reduce transaction costs

ndash increase mutual accountability

Key elements of a country compact

bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners

bull Aid management modalities

bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress

Some useful links

bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet

bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg

bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr

ameworksaspx

bull httpwwwetc-

crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28

124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0

Key elements of a country compact

bull Commitments by different players ndash government development agencies implementing partners

bull Aid management modalities

bull Monitoring arrangements and indicators for tracking progress

Some useful links

bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet

bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg

bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr

ameworksaspx

bull httpwwwetc-

crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28

124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0

Some useful links

bull httpwwwinternationalhealthpartnershipnet

bull httpwwwhealthintelligenceportalorg

bull httpwwwhlsporgHomeResourcesSectormonitoringfr

ameworksaspx

bull httpwwwetc-

crystalorgindexphpid=631ampL=120and20char28

124292Buser25202Bchar28124293D0

Thank you

Monitor

Action

Review