Our upcoming Bibliography Database is still being up-dated with information from our old static list. This old list is below; it is no longer being up-dated. Once the Bibliography Database is activated this Word document will no longer be available. Thank you for your patience during this transition.

A ♦Acredolo, L. P., Adams, A., & Goodwyn, S. W. (1984). The role of self-produced

movement and visual tracking in infant spatial orientation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 312-327.

♦Adams, R., White, J., Flannery, K., & Finn, P. (April, 2004). A virtual reality maze pilot study: Cross-sectional investigation of age by task complexity. Poster presented at the Eastern Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.

♦Adams, R., Flannery, K, Finn, P., & Hamilton, D. (March, 2003). A virtual reality pilot study: Assessment of memory and vigilance with a virtual radial arm maze. Poster presented at the Eastern Psychological Association, Baltimore, MD.

♦Agogino, A. M. & Linn, M. C. (1992). Retaining female engineering students: Will early design experiences help? [Viewpoint Editorial]. M. Wilson (Ed.), National Science Foundation Directions, 5 (2), 8-9.

♦Ainsworth, S.E. (2006). DEFT: A conceptual framework for learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction. 16(3), 183-198.

♦Ainsworth, S.E. & Van Labeke, N. (2004). Multiple forms of dynamic representation. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 241-255.

♦Ainsworth, S.E & Loizou, A. (2003). The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27, 669-681.

♦Ainsworth, S.E., Bibby, P.A & Wood, D.J. (2002). Examining the effects of different multiple representational systems in learning primary mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 25-62. ISSN 1050-8406.

♦Ainsworth, S.E. (1999). A functional taxonomy of multiple representations. Computers and Education, 33(2/3), 131-152.

♦Allen, S., Ozyurek, A., Kita, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., Ishizuka, T., & Fujii, M. (2007). How language specific is early syntactic packaging of Manner and Path? A comparison of English, Turkish, and Japanese. Cognition, 102, 16-48.

♦Alvarado, C., & Davis, R. (2001). Resolving ambiguities to create a natural sketch based interface. Proceedings of IJCAI-2001, August 2001.

♦Ashley, A. & Carlson, L. (in press). Encoding direction when interpreting proximal terms. Language and Cognitive Processes.

♦Avraamides, M., Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., & Golledge, R. G. (2004). Use of cognitive vs. perceptual heading during imagined locomotion depends on response mode. Psychological Science, 15, 403-408.

B ♦Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience on spatial test

performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20, 327-344. ♦Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1995). Environmental input to the development of

sex related differences in spatial and mathematical ability. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 363-379.

♦Bai, X. and Latecki, L. J. (2008). Path Similarity Skeleton Graph Matching. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 30(7).

♦Bai, X., Yang, X. and Latecki, L. J. (2008). Detection and Recognition of Contour Parts Based on Shape Similarity. Pattern Recognition (PR), 41(7), 2189-2199.

♦Baillargeon, R. (1991). Reasoning about the height and location of a hidden object in 4.5- and 6.5-month-old infants. Cognition, 38, 13-42.

♦Bamps, D. (2009). Jeremy Bentham: A critical approach. In J. Peeters (Ed), Ethics and Society (pp. 23-25). Leuven: Leuven University College, Dep. Social School.

♦Bamps, D. & Claeys, A. (2009). Are we always in control of the passion? Aha wetenstappen Leuven, Tourism Leuven – Association Catholic University of Leuven.

♦Bamps, D. & Roels, R. (2009). Visualization of a beautiful mind, mathematical eye-openers of moral behaviour and related (hidden) consequences. In the Proceedings of the Gordon Research Conferences: Visualization in science & education, Magdalen College Oxford, United Kingdom.

♦Barkowsky, T., Mental representation and processing of geographic knowledge: A computational approach, LNAI 2541, Springer, Berlin 2002.

♦Barkowsky T, Freksa C, Cognitive requirements on making and interpreting maps, in Hirtle S, Frank A, eds, Spatial information theory, 347-361, Springer, Berlin 1997.

♦Barkowsky T, Freksa C, Knauff M, eds, Special Issue Spatial and visual components in mental reasoning about space, Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5, 2 & 3, 115-269, 2005.

♦Barkowsky T, Knauff M, Ligozat G, Montello D, eds, Spatial cognition V: Reasoning, Action, Interaction, LNAI, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (to appear).

♦Barshi, I. & Healy, A. F. (2002). The effects of mental representation on performance in a navigation task. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1189-1203.

♦Bateman, J., Tenbrink, T. and Farrar, S. (2007). The Role of Conceptual and Linguistic Ontologies in Interpreting Spatial Discourse. Discourse Processes, 44(3), 175–212.

♦Beckmann, S. (2004). Solving Algebra and Other Story Problems with Simple Diagrams: A Method Demonstrated in Grade 4–6 Texts Used in Singapore. The Mathematics Educator, 14(1), 42-46.

♦Belingard, L., & Péruch, P. (2000). Mental representation and the spatial structure of virtual environments. Environment & Behavior, 32, 427-442.

♦Bertel, S., Vrachliotis, G., & Freksa, C, Aspect-oriented building design: Towards computer-aided approaches to solving spatial constraints in architecture. In: G. Allen, (Ed.), Applied Spatial Cognition: From Research to Cognitive Technology, pp. 75-102. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2007.

♦Berzhanskaya, J., Grossberg, S. and Mingolla, E. (2007). Laminar cortical dynamics of visual form and motion interactions during coherent object motion perception. Spatial Vision, 20(4), 337-395.

♦Bingman, V.P. and Cheng, K. (2005). Mechanisms of animal global navigation: Comparative perspectives and enduring challenges. Ethology, Ecology & Evolution, 17: 295-318.

♦Bingman, V.P., Gagliardo, A., Hough II, G.E., Ioalè, P., Kahn, M.C. and Siegel, J.J. (2005). The avian hippocampus, homing in pigeons and the memory representation of large-scale space. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 45: 555-564.

♦Bingman, V.P., Hough II, G.E., Kahn, M.C. and Siegel, J.J. (2003). The homing pigeon hippocampus and space: In search of adaptive specialization. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 62: 117-127.

♦Bingman, V.P. and Sharp, P.E. (2006). Neuronal implementation of hippocampal-mediated spatial behavior: A comparative-evolutionary perspective. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 5: 80-91.

♦Blajenkova, O., Kozhevnikov, M. & Motes, M. (2006). Object-Spatial Imagery: A New Self-Report Imagery Questionnaire. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 239-263.

♦Blajenkova, O., Motes, M. & Kozhevnikov, M. (2005). Individual differences in the representations of novel environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 97-109.

♦Blasko, D., Holliday-Darr, K., Mace, D., & Blasko-Drabik, H. (2004). VIZ: The visualization assessment and training website. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 36(2), 256-260.

♦Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers' conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1-22.

♦Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric Structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1-28.

♦Boroditsky, L. & Ramscar, M. (2002). The Roles of Body and Mind in Abstract Thought. Psychological Science, 13(2), 185-188.

♦Borst, G., Kosslyn, S. M., & Denis, M. (2006). Different cognitive processes in two image scanning paradigms. Memory and Cognition, 34, 475-490.

♦Bourgeois, K.S., Khawar, A.W., Neal, S.A., & Lockman, J.J. (2005). Infant manual exploration of objects, surfaces, and their interrelations. Infancy, 8(3), 233–252.

♦Bowerman, M. (1996). Learning how to structure space for language: A crosslinguistic perspective. In P. Bloom, M. Peterson, M. Garrett, and L. Nadel (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 385-436). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

♦Bremner, A. J., Holmes, N. P., & Spence, C. (in press). Infants (lost) in peripersonal space? Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

♦Bremner, A. J., Mareschal, D., Lloyd-Fox, S., & Spence, C. (2008). Spatial localization of touch in the first year of life: Early influence of a visual code and the development of remapping across changes in limb position. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 149-162.

♦Bremner, J.G. & Andreasen, G. (1997). A change in viewpoint promotes use of height-in-picture as a depth cue in 5- to 7-year-olds' drawings of a simple depth relationship. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 180–192.

♦Bremner, J.G. & Andreasen, G. (1998). Young children's ability to use maps and models to find ways in novel spaces. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 197-218.

♦Bremner, J.G., Andreasen, G., Kendall, G. & Adams, L. (1993). Conditions for success in coordination of spatial dimensions by four – year – old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 149–172.

♦Bremner, J.G. & Batten, A. (1991). Sensitivity to viewpoint in children's drawings of objects and relations between objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 52, 375–394.

♦Bremner, J.G., Johnson, S.P., Slater, A.M., Mason, U., Foster, K., Cheshire, A., & Spring, J. (2005). Conditions for Young Infants' Perception of Object Trajectories. Child Development, 74, 1029-1043.

♦Bremner, J.G., Knowles, L.S. & Andreasen, G. (1994). Young children's spatial orientation during movement: Evidence for a form of mental rotation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 57, 355–376.

♦Bridgeman, B. and Hoover, M. (2008). Processing spatial layout by perception and sensorimotor interaction. Experimental Psychology, iFirst, 1-9.

♦Broaders, S., Cook, S.W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (in press). Making Children Gesture Reveals Implicit Knowledge and Leads to Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.

♦Brockmole, J., Castelhano, M.S. & Henderson, J.M. (2006). Contextual Cueing in Naturalistic Scenes: Global and Local Contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32(4), 699-706.

♦Brown, A.A., Spetch, M.L., & Hurd, P.L. (2007). Growing in circles: Rearing environment alters spatial navigation in fish. Psychological Science, 18, 569-573.

♦Brown, J., Bullock, D., and Grossberg, S. (1999). How the basal ganglia use parallel excitatory and inhibitory learning pathways to selectively respond to unexpected rewarding cues. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 10502-10511.

♦Brown, J.W., Bullock, D., and Grossberg, S. (2004). How laminar frontal cortex and basal ganglia circuits interact to control planned and reactive saccades. Neural Networks, 17, 471-510.

♦Brown, J., Johnson, M.H., Paterson, S., Gilmore, R.O., Gsödl, M., Longhi, E., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2003). Spatial representation and attention in toddlers with Williams syndrome and Down syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 41(8), 1037-1046.

♦Bruggeman, H. , Pick, H. L. Jr. & Rieser J. J. (2005). Learning to throw on a rotating carousel: Recalibration based on limb dynamics and projectile kinematics. Experimental Brain Research, 163, 188-197.

♦Brunye, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., Augustyn, J. S. & Taylor, H. A. (in press). When you and I share perspectives: Pronouns and perspective-taking during narrative comprehension. Psychological Science.

♦Brunye, T. T., Mahoney, C. R., Augustyn, J. S. & Taylor, H. A. (in press). Emotional state and local versus global spatial memory. Acta Psychologica.

♦Brunye, T. T., Rapp, D. N. & Taylor, H. A. (2008). Representational flexibility and specificity following spatial descriptions of real-world environments. Cognition, 108, 418-443.

♦Brunye, T. T. & Taylor, H. A. (2008). Extended experience benefits spatial mental model development with route but not survey descriptions. Acta Psychologica, 127, 340-354.

♦Brunye, T. T. & Taylor, H.A. (in press). When goals constrain: Eye movements and memory for goal-oriented map study. Applied Cognitive Psychology.

♦Brunye, T. T. & Taylor, H. A. (2008). Working memory in developing and applying mental models from spatial descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 701-729.

♦Brunyé, T. T., Taylor, H. A., Rapp, D. N., & Spiro, A. B. (2006). Learning procedures: The role of working memory in multimedia learning experiences. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 917-940.

♦Brunye, T. T., Taylor, H. A. & Worboys, M. (2007). Levels of detail in descriptions and depictions of geographic space. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 7, 227-266.

♦Bullock, D., Cisek, P. and Grossberg, S. (1998). Cortical networks for control of voluntary arm movements under variable force conditions (Tech. Rep. No. CAS/CNS TR-95-019, Boston University). Cerebral Cortex, 8, 48-62.

♦Burgess N (2006) Spatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience 10 551-7.

♦Burgess N., Maguire E.A., O'Keefe J. (2002) The human hippocampus and spatial and episodic memory. Neuron 35, 625-641.

♦Burgess N., Spiers H.J., Paleologou E. (2004) Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences in spatial memory. Cognition 94 149-166.

♦Butcher, K. R. (2006). Learning From Text With Diagrams: Promoting Mental Model Development and Inference Generation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 182-197.

♦Butcher, K. R. & Aleven, V. (2007). Integrating visual and verbal knowledge during classroom learning with computer tutors. In D. S. McNamara & J. G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 137-142). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

♦Butcher, K. R., Bhushan, S. & Sumner, T. (2006). Multimedia displays for conceptual search processes: Information seeking with strand maps. ACM Multimedia Systems Journal, 11(3), 236-248.

♦Butcher, K. R., de la Chica, S., Ahmad, F., Gu, Q., Sumner, T. & Martin, J. H. (2008). Conceptual Customization for Learning with Multimedia: Developing Individual Instructional Experiences to Support Science Understanding. In R. Zheng (Ed.), Cognitive effects of multimedia learning. Hersehy, PA: IGI Global.

C ♦Cameron, S., Grossberg, S., and Guenther, F.H. (1998). A self-organizing neural

network architecture for navigation using optic flow. Neural Computation, 10, 313-352. ♦Campos, J.L. & Bülthoff, H.H. (in press). Multisensory Integration during Self-Motion

in Virtual Reality. In Wallace, M., and Murray, M. (Eds.), Frontiers in the Neural Bases of Multisensory Processes (projected publication date Fall 2009).

♦Carlson, L. A. (2003). Using spatial language. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 43, 127-161.

♦Carlson, L. A. & Kenny, R. (2006). Interpreting spatial terms involves simulating interactions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 682-688.

♦Carlson, L. A, Regier, T., Lopez, B. & Corrigan, B. (In press). Attention unites form and function in spatial language. Spatial Cognition and Computation.

♦Carlson, L. A. & Van Deman, S. (in press). Inhibition within a reference frame during the interpretation of spatial language. Cognition.

♦Carlson, L. A. & Van Deman, S. (2004). The space in spatial language. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(3), 418-436.

♦Carpenter, G.A. (2001). Neural network models of learning and memory: Leading questions and an emerging framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(3), 114-118.

♦Carpenter, G.A., Gaddam, C.S., & Mingolla, E. (2007). CONFIGR: A vision-based model for long-range figure completion. Neural Networks, 20(10), 1109-1131.

♦Carpenter, G.A., Martens, S., & Ogas, O.J. (2005). Self-organizing information fusion and hierarchical knowledge discovery: A new framework using ARTMAP neural networks. Neural Networks, 18(3), 287-295.

♦Carr, M. and Janes, P. (2007, May). Spatial ability, gender and cognitive strategy use as predictors of mathematics subtest performance. Presented at the NSF sponsored workshop on spatial processing, Hancock, MI.

♦Carr, M., Shing, Y. L., Janes, P. & Steiner, H. H. (2007, March). Early gender differences in strategy use and fluency: Implications for the emergence of gender differences in mathematics. Poster presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston, MA.

♦Carr, M., Shing, Yee Lee, Steiner, H. H. & Kyser, B. (2005, April). A Comparison of predictors of gender differences in calculation, geometry and word problem solving. Presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, GA.

♦Carr, M., Steiner, H. H., Kyser, B. & Biddlecomb, B. (in press). A Comparison of Predictors of Early Emerging Gender Differences in Mathematics Competency. Learning and Individual Differences.

♦Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L., Time in the mind: Using space to think about time, Cognition (2007), doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004

♦Casasola, M. (2005). Can language do the driving? The effect of linguistic input on infants' categorization of support spatial relations. Developmental Psychology, 41, 183-192.

♦Casasola, M. (in preparation). Comparison and language in infants' categorization of spatial relations.

♦Casasola, M. (2005). When less is more: How infants learn to form an abstract categorical representation of support. Child Development, 76, 279-290.

♦Casasola, M., Wilbourn, M. P., & Yang, S. (2006). Can English-learning toddlers acquire and generalize a novel spatial word? First Language, 26, 187-205.

♦Castelhano, M.S., & Henderson, J.M. (2008). The Influence of Color and Structure on Perception of Scene Gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(3), 660-675.

♦Castelhano, M.S., & Henderson, J.M. (2007). Initial Scene Representations Facilitate Eye Movement Guidance in Visual Search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 753-763.

♦Castelhano, M.S., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (in press). Integration of multiple views of scenes. Perception & Psychophysics.

♦Catrambone, R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,15, 1147-1156.

♦Chabanne, V., Péruch, P., & Thinus-Blanc, C. (2003). Virtual to real transfer of spatial learning in a complex environment: The role of path network and additionnal features. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 3, 43-59.

♦Chabanne, V., Péruch, P., & Thinus-Blanc, C. (2004). Sex differences and women's hormonal cycle effects on spatial performance in a virtual environment navigation task. Current Psychology of Cognition, 22, 351-375.

♦Chabay, R. & Sherwood, B. (2004). Modern Mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 72, 439-445.

♦Chabay, R. & Sherwood, B. (2006). Restructuring the introductory electricity and magnetism course. American Journal of Physics, 74(4), 329-336.

♦Chen, Z., & Klahr, D. (1999). All other things being equal: Acquisition and transfer of the Control of Variables Strategy. Child Development, 70, 1098-1120.

♦Cheng, K. & Newcombe, N.S. (2006). Geometry, features, and orientation in vertebrate animals: A pictorial review. In M.F. Brown & R.G. Cook (Eds.), Animal Spatial Cognition: Comparative, Neural & Computational Approaches. In cooperation with Comparative Cognition Press.

♦Childers, J. (2005) Is comparison useful for verb learning? Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, GA.

♦Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1986). The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge. Cognition, 23, 43-71.

♦Cienki, A. (2005). Image schemas and gesture. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 421–441). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

♦Cienki, A. (1998). Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In J.-P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap (189–204). Stanford, CA: CSLI.

♦Cienki, A. (2002). Questions about mental imagery, gesture, and image schemas. Journal of Mental Imagery, 26, 43–46.

♦Cienki, A. (1995). The semantics of possessive and spatial constructions in Russian and Bulgarian: A comparative analysis in cognitive grammar. Slavic and East European Journal, 39, 73–114.

♦Cienki, A. (1997). Some properties and groupings of image schemas. In M. Verspoor, K. D. Lee, & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning (pp. 3–15). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

♦Cienki, A. (1989). Spatial Cognition and the Semantics of Prepositions in English, Polish, and Russian. In the series Slavistische Beiträge Vol. 237. Munich: Sagner Verlag.

♦Cienki, A. (1998). Straight: An image schema and its metaphorical extensions. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 107–149.

♦Cienki, A. (1999). The strengths and weaknesses of the left/right polarity in Russian: Diachronic and synchronic semantic analyses. In L. de Stadler & C. Eyrich (Eds.), Issues in Cognitive Linguistics: 1993 Proceedings of the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (pp. 299–329). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

♦Cisek, P., Grossberg, S., and Bullock, D. (1998). A cortico-spinal model of reaching and proprioception under multiple task constraints. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 425-444.

♦Cohen, P. R., Johnston, M., McGee, D., Oviatt, S., Pittman, J., Smith, I., et al. (1997). QuickSet: Multimodal interaction for distributed applications. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual International Multimodal Conference (Multimedia '97), (pp. 31-40), Seattle, WA. ACM Press.

♦Contreras-Vidal, J.L., Grossberg, S., and Bullock, D. (1997). A neural model of cerebellar learning for arm movement control: Cortico-spino-cerebellar dynamics. Learning and Memory, 3, 475-502.

♦Coolican, J., and Peters, M. (2003). Sexual dimorphism in the 2D:4D ratio and its relation to mental rotation performance. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 179-183.

♦Collaer, M. L. & Hill, E. M. (2006). Large sex difference in adolescents on a timed line judgment task: Attentional contributors and task relationship to mathematics. Perception, 35, 561-572.

♦Collaer, M. L., & Nelson, J. D. (2002). Large visuospatial sex difference in line judgment: Possible role of attentional factors. Brain and Cognition, 49, 1-12.

♦Collaer, M. L., Reimers, S., & Manning, J. T. (2007). Visuospatial performance on an Internet line judgment task and potential hormonal markers: Sex, sexual orientation and 2D:4D. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 177-192.

♦Cook, S. W. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2006). The role of gesture in learning: Do children use their hands to change their minds? Journal of Cognition and Development, 7, 211-232.

♦Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (in press). Gesturing makes learning last. Cognition.

♦Coulter, B. and Kerski, J. (2005). Using GIS to transform the mathematical landscape. Chapter 22 in Technology-Supported Mathematical Learning Environments: 67th Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of the Teachers of Mathematics.

♦Crowther, H. L., Lew, A. R. & Whitaker, C. J. (2000). The development of beacon use for spatial orientation in 6-8.5-month-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 23, 41-59.

D ♦Daniel, M.-P., & Denis, M. (2004). The production of route directions: Investigating

conditions that favour conciseness in spatial discourse. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 57-75.

♦Daniel, M.-P., Mores Dibo-Cohen, C., Carité, L., Boyer, P., & Denis, M. (2007). Dysfunctions of spatial cognition in schizophrenic patients. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 7, 287-309.

♦Daniel, M.-P., Tom, A., Manghi, E., & Denis, M. (2003). Testing the value of route directions through navigational performance. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 3, 269-289.

♦Davies, J., Glasgow, J. & Kuo, T. (2006). Visio-spatial case-based reasoning: A case study in prediction of protein structure. Computational Intelligence, 22(3/4), 194-207.

♦Davies, J. & Goel, A. K. (2008). Visual re-representation in analogical reasoning. The Open Artificial Intelligence Journal, 2, 11-20.

♦Della Sala, S., Logie, R. H., Beschin, N., & Denis, M. (2004). Preserved visuo-spatial transformations in representational neglect. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1358-1364.

♦Denis, M. (in press). Assessing the symbolic distance effect in mental images constructed from verbal descriptions: A study of individual differences in the mental comparison of distances. Acta Psychologica.

♦Denis, M. (2002). Can human brain construct visual mental images from linguistic inputs? In A. M. Galaburda, S. M. Kosslyn, & Y. Christen (Eds.), The languages of the brain (pp. 215-225). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

♦Denis, M. (1989). Image et cognition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Revised English version: Image and cognition. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991.

♦Denis, M. (Ed.) (1997). Langage et cognition spatiale. Paris: Masson. ♦Denis, M. (1979). Les images mentales. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Spanish

translation: Las imagenes mentales. Madrid: Siglo Veintiuno de Espana, 1984. Japanese translation: Imeji no shinrigaku. Tokyo: Keiso Shobo, 1989.

♦Denis, M. (2000). Psychological science in cross-disciplinary contexts. In K. Pawlik & M. R. Rosenzweig (Eds.), The international handbook of psychology (pp. 585-597). London: Sage.

♦Denis, M. (2006). Psychological science in its multidisciplinary environment. In Q. Jing, M. R. Rosenzweig, G. d'Ydewalle, H. Zhang, H.-C. Chen, & K. Zhang (Eds.), Progress in psychological science around the world. Vol. 1: Neural, cognitive and developmental issues (pp. 49-60). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

♦Denis, M., Beschin, N., Logie, R. H., & Della Sala, S. (2002). Visual perception and verbal descriptions as sources for generating mental representations: Evidence from representational neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 97-112.

♦Denis, M., & Borst, G. (2006). Variations on the image scanning paradigm: What do they contribute to our knowledge of mental imagery? In T. Vecchi & G. Bottini (Eds.), Imagery and spatial cognition: Methods, models and cognitive assessment (pp. 49-68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

♦Denis, M., Engelkamp, J., & Richardson, J. T. E. (Eds.) (1988). Cognitive and neuropsychological approaches to mental imagery. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.

♦Denis, M., & Loomis, J. M. (Eds.) (2007). Human spatial cognition: Memory, navigation, and environmental learning. Special Issue of Psychological Research.

♦Denis, M., Mellet, E., & Kosslyn, S. M. (Eds.) (2004). Neuroimaging of mental imagery. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

♦Denis, M., Michon, P.-E., & Tom, A. (2006). Assisting pedestrian wayfinding in urban settings: Why references to landmarks are crucial in direction-giving. In G. L. Allen (Ed.), Applied spatial cognition: From research to cognitive technology (pp. 25-51). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

♦Denis, M., Ricalens, K., Baudouin, V., & Nespoulous, J.-L. (2006). Deficits in the spatial discourse of Alzheimer patients. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 335-349). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

♦Denis, M., & Sabah, G. (Eds.) (1993). Modèles et concepts pour la science cognitive: Hommage à Jean-François Le Ny. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.

♦Denis, M., et al. (Eds.) (2001). Imagery, language, and visuo-spatial thinking. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

♦Deubel, H., Schneider, W.X. and Bridgeman, B. (2002). Transsaccadic memory of position and form. In J. Hyönä, D.P. Munoz, W. Heide and R. Radach (Eds.), Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 140 (pp. 165-180). Elsevier.

♦Deyzac, E., Logie, R. H., & Denis, M. (2006). Visuospatial working memory and the processing of spatial descriptions. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 217-243.

♦Diedrichsen, J., Grafton, S., Albert, N., Hazeltine, E., and Ivry, R.B. (2006). Goal-selection and movement-related conflict during bimanual reaching movements. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 1729-1738.

♦Dodick, J. T. and Orion, N (2003). Cognitive factors affecting student understanding of geological time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 415-442.

♦Duffy, S., Huttenlocher, J. & Levine, S. (2005). It's all relative: How young children encode extent. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6, 51-63.

♦Duffy, S., Huttenlocher, J., Levine, S. & Duffy, R. (2005). How infants encode spatial extent. Infancy, 7, 81-90.

♦Duffy, S., Toriyama, R., Itakura, S. & Kitayama, S. (in press). The development of culturally-contingent attention strategies in young children in the U.S. and Japan. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.

E ♦Egenhofer, M. J., Freksa, C., & Miller, H. J., eds., Geographic information science,

Third International Conference GIScience 2004, LNCS 3234, Springer, Berlin 2004. ♦Ehrlich, S. B., Levine, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. The importance of gesture in children's

spatial reasoning. Developmental Psychology, in press.

♦Emmorey, K. (2002). The effects of modality on spatial language: How signers and speakers talk about space. In R. P. Meier, D. G. Quinto, & K. A. Cormier (Eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages (pp. 405-421), Cambridge University Press.

♦Emmorey, K., Grabowski, TJ., McCullough, S., Ponto, L., Hichwa, R., & Damasio, H. (2005). The neural correlates of spatial language in English and American Sign Language: A PET study with hearing bilinguals. NeuroImage, 24, 832-840.

♦Emmorey, K., Klima, E., & Hickok, G. (1998). Mental rotation within linguistic and nonlinguistic domains in users of American Sign Language. Cognition, 68, 221-246.

♦Emmorey, K., Kosslyn, S. M., & Bellugi, U. (1993). Visual imagery and visual-spatial language: Enhanced imagery abilities in deaf and hearing ASL signers. Cognition, 46, 139-181.

♦Emmorey, K., Tversky, B., & Taylor, H. (2000). Using space to describe space: Perspective in speech, sign, and gesture. Spatial cognition and computation, 2, 157-180.

♦Estes, Z., Verges, M. & Barsalou, L.W. (2008). Head Up, Foot Down: Object Words Orient Attention to the Objects' Typical Location. Psychological Science, 19(2), 93-97.

F ♦Fabrikant, S.I. (2005). Towards an understanding of geovisualization with dynamic

displays: Issues and Prospects. Proceedings of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) 2005 Spring Symposium Series: Reasoning with Mental and External Diagrams: Computational Modeling and Spatial Assistance, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, Mar. 21-23, 2005, 6-11.

♦Fabrikant, S. I. and Montello, D. R. (2008). The effect of instructions on distance and similarity judgments in information spatializations. International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 22(4), 463-478.

♦Fabrikant, S. I., Montello, D. R. and Mark, D. M. (2006). The distance-similarity metaphor in region-display spatializations. IEEE Computer Graphics & Application, July/August, 34-44.

♦Fabrikant, S.I., Montello, D.R., Ruocco, M. and Middleton, R.S. (2004). The distance-similarity metaphor in network-display spatializations. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 31(4), 237-252.

♦Fabrikant, S. I., Rebich-Hespanha, S., Andrienko, N., Andrienko, G. and Montello, D. R. (2008). Novel Method to Measure Inference Affordance in Static Small Multiple Displays Representing Dynamic Processes. The Cartographic Journal, 45(3), 201-215.

♦Fabrikant, S. I., Rebich-Hespanha, S. and Hegarty, M. (in press). Cognitively adequate and perceptually salient graphic displays for efficient spatial inference making. Annals of the Association of American Geographers.

♦Fabrikant, S.I. and Skupin A. (2005). Cognitively plausible information visualization. In J. Dykes, A.M. MacEachren & M.J. Kraak (Eds.), Exploring GeoVisualization, (pp. 667-690). Elsevier: Amsterdam.

♦Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K.D., & Gentner, D. (1989). The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence, 41, 1-63.

♦Feist, M. I. (in press). Inside/in/and/on/: Typological and psycholinguistic perspectives. In V. Evans & P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, Cognition and Space: The state of the art and new directions. London: Equinox.

♦Feist, M. I. (2004). Talking about space: A cross-linguistic perspective. In K. D. Forbus, T. Regier, & D. Gentner (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 375-380). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

♦Feist, M.I., & Genter, D. (2001). An influence of spatial language on recognition memory for spatial scenes. In J.D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 279-284).

♦Feist, M. I., & Gentner, D. (2007). Spatial language influences memory for spatial scenes. Memory & Cognition, 35(2), 283-296.

♦Feng, J., Spence, I., & Pratt, J. (2007). Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition. Psychological Science, 18, 850-855.

♦Fennema, E. & Tartre, L.A. (1985). The use of spatial skills in mathematics by girls and boys. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 184 -206.

♦Fiala, J.C., Grossberg, S. and Bullock, D. (1996). Metabotropic glutamate receptor activation in cerebellar Purkinje cells as substrate for adaptive timing of the classically conditioned eye blink response. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 3760-3774.

♦Fias, W. & Fischer, M. H. (2005). Spatial representation of numbers. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 43-54). New York: Psychology Press.

♦Finlay, C., Motes, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2006). Updating representations of learned scenes. Psychological Researcher: Special Issue on Spatial Cognition.

♦Fischer, M. H. (2003). Cognitive representation of negative numbers. Psychological Science, 14(3), 278-282.

♦Fischer, M.H. (2008). Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations. Cortex, 44, 386-392.

♦Fischer, M. H. (2003). Spatial representations in number processing - Evidence from a pointing task. Visual Cognition, 10(4), 493-508.

♦Fischer, M. H., Castel. A. D., Dodd, M. D. & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6(6), 555-556.

♦Fischer, M. H., Warlop, N., Hill, R. L. & Fias, W. (2004). Oculomotor bias induced by number perception. Experimental Psychology, 51(2), 91-97.

♦Flanagan, R. (1996). Learning Through Direct vs. Indirect Experience: The role of interactivity and physicality in media effects. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Services.

♦Flanagan, R. and Black, J.B. (2001). Effects of learning from interaction with physical or mediated devices. In G. Burton and R. Schmidt (Eds.), Studies in Perception and Action VI. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

♦Flanagan, R., Gurkewitz, R., Wilson, M., and Skrip, L. (in revision after feedback from Perceptual and Motor Skills). Improving spatial reasoning through experience: Evidence of priming and long-term effects.

♦Flannery, K.A., Krauchunas, S., & Finn, P. (2000). Virtual cognition laboratory: A constructivist approach toward. In L.P. Nedel & R. S. Wazlawick (Eds.), Proceedings of

the third workshop on virtual reality learning (pp. 89-95). Gramado, Brazil: Brazilian Computer Society.

♦Foos, P. W. & Goolkasian, P. (2005). Presentation Format Effects in Working Memory: The Role of Attention. Memory & Cognition, 33, 499-513.

♦Forbus, K. (1995). Qualitative spatial reasoning: Framework and frontiers. In J. Glasgow, N. Narayanan, and B. Chandrasekaran, Diagrammatic reasoning: Cognitive and computational perspectives, AAAI Press.

♦Forbus, K., Ferguson, R., & Usher, J. (2001). Towards a computational model of sketching. IUI'01, January 14-17, 2001, Santa Fe, New Mexico.

♦Forbus, K.D., Gentner, D., & Law, K. (1994). MAC/FAC: A model of similarity-based retrieval. Cognitive Science, 19, 141-205. (Abridged version to be reprinted in T. Polk & C.M. Seifert (Eds.), Cognitive Modeling. Boston: MIT Press.)

♦Forbus, K., Nielsen, P. and Faltings, B. (1991). Qualitative Spatial Reasoning: The CLOCK Project. Artificial Intelligence, 51 (1-3).

♦Forbus, K., & Usher, J. (2002). Sketching for knowledge capture: A progress report. Proceedings of IUI'02, San Francisco, California, January 13-16, 2002.

♦Fox-Gliessman, D. and Kerski, J. (2005). Technology and the study of wildfire: Middle school students study the impacts of wildfire. Meridian: A Middle School Technology Journal, 8(Winter).

♦Freksa C, Fuzzy logic: an interface between logic and human reasoning, IEEE Expert 9, 4, Aug. 1994, 20-21.

♦Freksa C, Spatial aspects of task-specific wayfinding maps: A representation-theoretic perspective, in Gero JS, Tversky B, eds, Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design, 15-32, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney, 1999.

♦Freksa C, Temporal reasoning based on semi-intervals, Artificial Intelligence 54 (1992) 199-227.

♦Freksa, C, Qualitative spatial reasoning, in Mark DM, Frank AU, eds, Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space, 361-372, Kluwer, Dordrecht 1991.

♦Freksa, C., Brauer, W., Habel, C., & Wender, K. F., eds., Spatial cognition II – Integrating abstract theories, empirical studies, formal methods, and practical applications, LNAI 1849, Springer, Berlin, 2000.

♦Freksa, C., Brauer, W., Habel, C., & Wender, K. F., eds., Spatial Cognition III – Routes and navigation, human memory and learning, spatial representation and spatial learning, LNAI 2685, Springer, Berlin, 2003.

♦Freksa, C., Habel, C., & Wender, K. F., eds., Spatial cognition, LNAI 1404, Springer, Berlin, 1998.

♦Freksa C, Knauff M, Krieg-Brückner B, Nebel B, Barkowsky T, eds, Spatial cognition IV – Reasoning, Action, Interaction, LNAI 3343, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.

♦Freksa, C., & Mark, D. M., eds., Spatial information theory – Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science, LNCS 1661, Springer, Berlin, 1999.

♦Freksa C, Moratz R, Barkowsky T, Robot navigation with schematic maps, in Pagello E et al, eds, Intelligent Autonomous Systems 6, 809-816, IOS Press, 2000.

♦Frost, B. J. & Sun, H.-J. (2003). The biological basis of time to collision computation. In H. Hecht & G.J.P. Savelsbergh (Eds.), Time-to-contact: Advances in Psychology Series (pp. 13-37). Amsterdam (North Holland): Elsevier.

♦Furbach U, Dirlich G, Freksa C, Towards a theory of knowledge representation systems, in Bibel W, Petkoff B, eds, Artificial Intelligence Methodology, Systems, Applications, 77-84, North-Holland, Amsterdam 1985.

G ♦Gancarz, G. and Grossberg, G. (1998). A neural model of the saccade generator in the

reticular formation. Neural Networks, 11, 1159-1174. ♦Gancarz, G. and Grossberg, G. (1999). A neural model of the saccadic eye movement

control explains task-specific adaptation. Vision Research, 39, 3123-3143. ♦Garrad-Cole, F., Lew, A.R., Bremner, J.G., & Whitaker, C.J. (2001). Use of

configurational geometry for spatial orientation in human infants (Homo Sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 317-320.

♦Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.

♦Gentner, D., Imai, M., & Boroditsky, L. (2002). As time goes by: Evidence for two systems in processing space-time metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 537-565.

♦Gentner, D., & Loewenstein, J. (2002). Relational language and relational thought. In J. Byrnes & E. Amsel (Eds.), Language, literacy, and cognitive development, (pp. 87-120). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

♦Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 393-408.

♦Gentner, D., & Namy, L. (1999). Comparison in the development of categories. Cognitive Development, 14, 487-513.

♦Gentner, D., & Rattermann, M. J. (1991). Language and the career of similarity. In S. A. Gelman & J.P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on language and thought: Interrelations in development, (pp. 225-277). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

♦Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38.

♦Gilbert, A. L., Regier,T., Kay, P., & Ivry, R. B. (2005). Whorf hypothesis is supported in the right visual field but not the left. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 489-494.

♦Gilmore, R.O., Baker, T.J., & Grobman, K.H. (2004). Stability in infants' discrimination of optic flow. Developmental Psychology, 40 (2), 259-270.

♦Gilmore, R.O. & Johnson, M.H. (1997). Body-centered representations for visually-guided action emerge in early infancy. Cognition, 65, B1-B9.

♦Gilmore, R.O., & Johnson, M.H. (1997). Egocentric action in early infancy: Spatial frames of reference for saccades. Psychological Science, 8(3), 224-230.

♦Gilmore, R.O., & Rettke, H.R. (2003). Four-month-olds' discrimination of optic flow patterns depicting different directions of observer motion. Infancy, 4(2), 177-200.

♦Giocomo, L.M., Zilli, E.A., Fransen, E., Hasselmo, M.E. (2007, March 23). Temporal frequency of subthreshold oscillations scales with entorhinal grid cell field spacing. Science, 315(5819), 1719-22. Abstract only.

♦Gnadt, W. and Grossberg, S. (in press). SOVEREIGN: An autonomous neural system for incrementally learning planned action sequences to navigate towards a rewarded goal (Tech. Rep. CAS/CNS-TR-07-015). Neural Networks.

♦Göksun, T., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R. M. (In press). Trading spaces: Carving up events for learning language. Perspectives on Psychological Science.

♦Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

♦Goldin-Meadow, S., Kim, S., & Singer, M. (1999). What the teacher's hands tell the student's mind about math. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 720-730.

♦Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., Kelly, S., & Wagner, S. (2001). Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Science, 12, 516-522.

♦Goldin-Meadow, S. & Singer, M. A. (2003). From children's hands to adults' ears: Gesture's role in teaching and learning. Developmental Psychology, 39, 509-520.

♦Goldin-Meadow, S. & Wagner, S.M. (2005). How our hands help us learn. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 234-241.

♦Gonzalez-Marquez, M., Mittelberg, I., Coulson, S., and M. J. Spivey (Eds.) (2007). Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

♦Goodsell, D. S. (2009). Fact and Fantasy in Nanotech Imagery. Leonardo, 42, 52-57. ♦Goodsell, D. S. (2009). Illustrating the Machinery of Life: Neuromuscular Synapse.

Biochem. Mol. Biol. Education (BAMBED), 37, 204-210. ♦Goodsell, D. S. (2003). Looking at Molecules: An Essay on Art and Science.

ChemBioChem, 4(1-5). ♦Goodsell, D.S. (2009). The Machinery of Life (2nd ed.). New York: Springer. ♦Goodsell, D. S. (2007). Making the Step from Chemistry to Biology and Back. Nature

Chemical Biology, 3, 681-684. ♦Goodsell, D. S. (2005). Visual Methods from Atoms to Cells. Structure, 13, 347-354. ♦Goolkasian, P. & Foos, P.W. (2002) Presentation Format and Its Effect on Working

Memory. Memory & Cognition, 30,1096-1105. ♦Goolkasian, P. & Bojko, A. (2001). Location constancy and its effect on visual

selection. Spatial Vision 14, 175-201. ♦Gorchetchnikov, A. and Grossberg, S. (2007). Space, time, and learning in the

hippocampus: How fine spatial and temporal scales are expanded into population codes for behavioral control. Neural Networks, 20(2), 182-93.

♦Grafton, S.T., Hazeltine, E., and Ivry, R.B. (2002). Motor sequence learning with the non-dominant hand: A PET functional imaging study. Experimental Brain Research, 146, 369-378.

♦Gramann, K., Müller, H.J., Eick, E.-M. and Schönebeck, B. (2005). Evidence of Separable Spatial Representations in a Virtual Navigation Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1199-1223.

♦Gramann, K., Müller, H.J., Schönebeck, B. and Debus, G. (2006). The neural basis of ego- and allocentric reference frames in spatial navigation: Evidence from spatio-temporal coupled current density reconstruction. Brain Research, 1118(1), 116-129.

♦Granger, E., Rubin, M., Grossberg, S., and Lavoie, P. (2001). A what-and-where fusion neural network for recognition and tracking of multiple radar emitters. Neural Networks, 14, 325-344.

♦Gray, E.R., Bloomfield, L.L., Ferrey, A., Spetch, M.L. & Sturdy, C.B. (2005). Spatial encoding in mountain chickadees: Features overshadow geometry. Biology Letters, 1, 314-317.

♦Gray, E. R. & Spetch, M.L. (2006). Pigeons encode absolute distance but relational direction from landmarks and walls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 474-480.

♦Griffin, A.L., Eichenbaum, H., Hasselmo, M.E. (2007). Spatial representations of hippocampal CA1 neurons are modulated by behavioral context in a hippocampus-dependent memory task. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(9), 2416-23.

♦Grodner, D., Pietsch, C. & Durgin, F. (2009). The Use of Categorical Features in Adult Spatial Reorientation. Proceedings of the 2009 Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Amsterdam: The Netherlands.

♦Grossberg, S. (2000). The complementary brain: Unifying brain dynamics and modularity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 233-246.

♦Grossberg, S. (2003). How does the cerebral cortex work? Development, learning, attention, and 3D vision by laminar circuits of visual cortex. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 2, 47-76.

♦Grossberg, S. and Huang, T.R. (in press). ARTSCENE: A Neural System for Natural Scene Classification. Journal of Vision.

♦Grossberg, S. and Merrill, J.W.L. (l996). The hippocampus and cerebellum in adaptively timed learning, recognition, and movement. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 257-277.

♦Grossberg, S., Mingolla, E., and Pack, C. (1999). A neural model of motion processing and visual navigation by cortical area MST. Cerebral Cortex, 9, 878-895.

♦Grossberg, S. and Paine, R.W.(2000). A neural model of corticocerebellar interactions during attentive imitation and predictive learning of sequential handwriting movements. Neural Networks, 13, 999-1046.

♦Grossberg, S. and Pearson, L. (in press). Laminar cortical dynamics of cognitive and motor working memory, sequence learning and performance: Toward a unified theory of how the cerebral cortex works (Tech. Rep. CAS/CNS-TR-08-002, Boston University). Psychological Review.

♦Grossberg, S., Roberts, K., Aguilar, M., and Bullock, D. (1997). A neural model of multimodal adaptive saccadic eye movement control by superior colliculus. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 9706-9725.

♦Grossberg, S. and Seidman, D. (2006). Neural dynamics of autistic behaviors: Cognitive, emotional, and timing substrates. Psychological Review, 113, 483-525.

♦Gunzelmann, G. (2008). Strategy generalization across orientation tasks: Testing a computational cognitive model. Cognitive Science, 32(5), 835-861.

♦Gunzelmann, G. & Anderson, J. R. (2006). Location matters: Why target location impacts performance in orientation tasks. Memory & Cognition, 34(1), 41-59.

♦Gunzelmann, G., Anderson, J. R. & Douglass, S. (2004). Orientation tasks with multiple views of space: Strategies and performance. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 4(3), 207-253.

♦Gunzelmann, G. & Lyon, D. R. (2007). Mechanisms of human spatial competence. In T. Barkowsky, M. Knauff, G. Ligozat and D. Montello (Eds.), Spatial Cognition V: Reasoning, Action, Interaction. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence #4387 (pp. 288-307). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

♦Gureckis, T.M. and Love, B.C. (2009). Short Term Gains, Long Term Pains: How Cues About State Aid Learning in Dynamic Environments. Cognition. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.03.013.

♦Gureckis, T.M. and Markant, D. (2009). Active Learning Strategies in a Spatial Concept Learning Game. In Taatgen, N., van Rijn, H., Schomaker, L. and Nerbonne, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3145-3150). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

♦Gwizdka, J., & Spence, I. (2007). Implicit measures of lostness and success in web navigation. Interacting with Computers, 19, 357-369.

H ♦Habel, C., & Werner, S., eds., Special issue on spatial reference systems, Spatial

Cognition and Computation, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1999. ♦Halpern, D. F., & Collaer, M. L. (2005). Sex differences in visuospatial abilities: More

than meets the eye. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking (pp. 170-212). Cambridge University Press.

♦Hartley T, Bird CM, Chan D, Cipolotti L, Husain M, Vargha-Khadem F, Burgess N (2007) The hippocampus is required for short-term topographical memory in humans. Hippocampus 17 34-48.

♦Hartley T., Trinkler I., & Burgess N. (2004) Geometric determinants of human spatial memory. Cognition 94 39-75.

♦Hasselmo, M.E. (2007). Arc length coding by interference of theta frequency oscillations may underlie context-dependent hippocampal unit data and episodic memory function. Learning and Memory, 14, 782-794.

♦Hasselmo, M.E. (2005). A model of prefrontal cortical mechanisms for goal directed behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(7), 1115-29.  MATLAB script demonstrating models

♦Hasselmo, M.E. (2005). What is the function of hippocampal theta rhythm?--Linking behavioral data to phasic properties of field potential and unit recording data. Hippocampus, 15(7), 936-49.

♦Hasselmo, M.E. and Eichenbaum, H. (2005). Hippocampal mechanisms for the context-dependent retrieval of episodes. Neural Networks, 18(9), 1172-1190.  MATLAB script demonstrating models

♦Hasselmo, M.E., Giocomo, L.M., Zilli, E.A. (2007). Grid cell firing may arise from interference of theta frequency membrane potential oscillations in single neurons. Hippocampus, 17(12), 1252-1271.

♦Haun, D.B.M., Call, J., Janzen, G., & Levinson S.C. (2006). Evolutionary psychology of spatial representations in the Hominidae. Current Biology, 16, 1736-1740.

♦Haun, D.B.M., Rapold, C., Call, J., Janzen, G., & Levinson, S.C. (2006). Cognitive cladistics and cultural override in Hominid spatial cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 17568-17573.

♦Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2004). A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities. Intelligence, 32, 175 - 191.

♦Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), Handbook of Higher-level Visuospatial Thinking, (pp. 121 - 169). New York: Cambridge University Press.

♦Herman, T., Morris, J., Colton, S., Batiza, A., Patrick, M., Franzen, M. & Goodsell, D. S. (2006). Tactile Teaching: Exploring Protein Structure/Function Using Physical Models. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Education (BAMBED), 34, 247-254.

♦Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R. (Eds.) (2006) Action meets word: How children learn verbs. New York: Oxford University Press.

♦Hochmair, H.H., Büchner, S., Hölscher, C. (in press). Impact of Regionalization and Relative Detour on ad-hoc Path Choice. Spatial Cognition and Computation.

♦Holliday-Darr, K., Blasko, D., & Dwyer, C. (1999) Improving Cognitive Visualization with a Web-Based Interactive Assessment and Training program. American Society for Engineering Educators, Engineering Design Graphics Division 54th Annual Mid Year Meeting Proceedings, 147-151.

♦Hölscher, C., Büchner, S., Brösamle, M., Meilinger, T., & Strube, G. (2007). Signs and Maps – Cognitive Economy in the Use of External Aids for Indoor Navigation. In D. S. McNamara & J. G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 377-382). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

♦Hölscher, C., Büchner, S., Meilinger, T., & Strube, G. (2007). Map Use and Wayfinding Strategies in a Multi-Building Ensemble. In T. Barkowsky, et al. (Eds.), Spatial Cognition V - Reasoning, Action, Interaction. International Conference Spatial Cognition 2006, Bremen, Germany, September 2006, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 4387, pp. 365–380.

♦C. Hölscher, R. Conroy Dalton & A. Turner (Eds.). (2007). Space Syntax and Spatial Cognition: Proceedings of the Workshop held in Bremen, 24th September 2006. Bremen: University of Bremen Press.

♦Hölscher, C., Meilinger, T., Vrachliotis, G., Brösamle, M., & Knauff, M. (2006). Up the Down Staircase: Wayfinding Strategies and Multi-Level Buildings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4), 284-299.

♦Hostetter, A. B., Alibali, W. M., & Kita, S. (2007). I see it in my hand's eye: Representational gestures are sensitive to conceptual demands. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(3), 313-336.

♦Hsi, S., Linn, M.C., & Bell, J.E. (1997). The role of spatial reasoning in engineering and the design of spatial instruction. Journal of Engineering Education, 86 (2), 151-158.

♦Hubbard, T. L. (2006). Computational theory and cognition in representational momentum and related types of displacement: A reply to Kerzel. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 174-177.

♦Hubbard, T. L., & Motes, M. A. (2005). An effect of context on whether memory for initial position exhibits a Fröhlich Effect or an Onset Repulsion Effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 961-979.

♦Hubbard, T. L. (2004). The perception of causality: Insights from Michotte's launching effect, naive impetus theory, and representational momentum. In A. M. Oliveira, M.P. Teixeira, G. F. Borges, & M. J. Ferro (Eds.). Fechner Day 2004 (pp. 116-121). Coimbra, Portugal: The International Society for Psychophysics.

♦Hubbard, T. L. (2008). Representational momentum contributes to motion induced mislocalization of stationary objects. Visual Cognition, 16, 44-67.

♦Hubbard, T. L. (2005). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 822-851.

♦Hubbard, T. L. (2008). Representational momentum as a new Gestalt principle. In B. A. Schneider, B. M. Ben-David, S. Parker, & W. Wong. (Eds.), Fechner Day 2008. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics (pp. 333-338). Toronto, Canada: The International Society for Psychophysics.

♦Hund, A. M., & Plumert, J. M. (2005). The stability and flexibility of spatial categories. Cognitive Psychology, 50, 1-44.

♦Hund, A. M., & Plumert, J. M. (2007). What counts as "by?" Young children's use of relative distance to judge nearbyness. Developmental Psychology, 43, 121-133.

♦Hutchins, E. (1996). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

♦Huttenlocher, J., Duffy, S., & Levine, S. (2002). Infants and toddlers discriminate amount: Are they measuring? Psychological Science, 13, 244-249.

♦Huttenlocher, J., Levine, S., & Vevea, J. (1998). Environmental input and cognitive growth: A study using time-period comparisons. Child Development, 69, 1012-1029.

♦Huttenlocher, J., Newcombe, N., & Vasilyeva, M. (1999). Spatial scaling in young children. Psychological Science, 10, 393-398.

♦Huttenlocher, J. & Vasilyeva, M. (2003). How toddlers represent enclosed spaces. Cognitive Science, 27, 749-766.

♦Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Newcombe, N. & Duffy, S. (2008). Developing symbolic capacities one step at a time. Cognition, 106, 1-12.

♦Hyde, J. S. & Linn, M. C. (2006). Gender Similarities: Implications for Science and Mathematics Education. Science, 314, 599-600.

I ♦Ishikawa, T., Barnston, A. G., Kastens, K. A., Louchouarn, P., & Ropelewski, C. F.

(2005). Climate forecast maps as a communication and decision-support tool: An

empirical test with prospective policy makers. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 32, 3-16.

♦Ishikawa, T., & Montello, D. R. (2006). Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: Individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 93-129.

♦Iverson, J.M. (1999). How to get to the cafeteria: Gesture and speech in blind and sighted children's spatial descriptions. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1132-1142.

♦Iverson, J.M. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1997). What's communication got to do with it? Gesture in congenitally blind children. Developmental Psychology, 33, 453-467.

J ♦Jacobs, L., & Schenk, F. (2003). Unpacking the cognitive map: The parallel map theory

of hippocampal function. Psychological Review, 110, 285-315. ♦Jansen-Osmann, P., & Berendt, B. (2005). What makes a route appear longer? An

experimental and computational perspective on features, route segmentation, and distance Knowledge. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58 A, 1390-1414.

♦Jansen-Osmann, P., & Heil, M. (2007). Are children experts in spatial associate learning? Experimental Psychology, 54, 236-242.

♦Jansen-Osmann, P., & Heil, M. (2007). Developmental aspects of the laterality of ERP effects during mental rotation. NeuroReport,18,175-178.

♦Jansen-Osmann, P., & Wiedenbauer, G. (2004). The wayfinding ability and spatial knowledge of adults and children in a colour coded building. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 4,337-358.

♦Janzen, G. (2006). Memory for object location and route direction in virtual large-scale space. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59/, 493-508.

♦Janzen, G. & van Turennout, M. (2004). Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 673-677.

♦Janzen, G., Wagensveld, B., & van Turennout, M. (2007). Neural representation of navigational relevance is rapidly induced and long-lasting. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 975-981.

♦Jefferies, M.E. and Yeap, W.K. (2008). (Eds.). Robotics and Cognitive Approaches to Spatial Mapping, Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics.

♦Johnson, M.H. & Gilmore, R.O. (1998). Object-centered representations in 8-month-old infants. Developmental Science, 1, 221-225.

♦Johnson, A., Seeland,K. D., & Redish, A. D. (2005). Reconstruction of the postsubiculum head direction signal from neural ensembles. Hippocampus, 15, 86-96.

♦Jordan, K., Wüstenberg, T., Heinze, H-J., Peters, M., & Jäncke, L. (2002). Women and men exhibit different cortical activation patterns during mental rotation tasks. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2397-2408.

♦Jordan, K., Wustenberg, T. Jaspers-Fayer, F., Fellbrich, A., and Peters, M. (2006). Sex differences in left/right confusion. Cortex, 42, 69-78.

K ♦Kali, Y. (2002). CILT2000: Visualization and Modeling. Journal of Science Education

and Technology, 11(3), 305-310. ♦Kali, Y. and Orion, N. (1996). Spatial abilities of high-school students in the perception

of geologic structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 369-391. ♦Kali, Y., Orion, N. & Mazor, E. (1997). Software for assisting high school students in

the spatial perception of geological structures. Journal of Geoscience Education, 45, 10-21.

♦Kastens, K. A. and T. Ishikawa (2006). Spatial Thinking in the Geosciences and Cognitive Sciences. In C. Manduca, D. Mogk and N. Stillings (Eds.), Earth and Mind, Geological Society of America Special Paper 413 (pp. 53-76).

♦Kastens, K. A., Kaplan, D. and Christie-Blick, K. (2001). Development and evaluation of a technology-supported map-skills curriculum, Where are We?. Journal of Geoscience Education, 49(3), 249-266.

♦Kastens, K. A., and L. S. Liben (2007). Eliciting self-explanations improves children's performance on a field-based map skills task. Cognition and Instruction, 25, 45-74.

♦Kaufman, J., Gilmore, R.O., & Johnson, M.H. (2006). Frames of reference for anticipatory action in 4-month-old infants. Infant Behavior & Development, 29(3), 322-333.

♦Keele, S.W., Ivry, R.B., Mayr, U., Hazeltine, E., and Heuer, H. (2003). The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. Psychological Review, 110, 316-330.

♦Kelly, J.W., Avraamides, M.N. & Loomis, J.M. (in press). Sensorimotor alignment effects in the learning environment and in novel environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition.

♦Kennerley, S.W., Diedrichsen, J., Hazeltine, E., Semjen, A., and Ivry, R.B. (2002). Callosotomy patients exhibit temporal and spatial uncoupling during continuous bimanual movements. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 376-381.

♦Kerski, Joseph J. (2004, March). Analyzing the Earth with Geographic Information Systems. NSS News. Huntsville, AL: National Speleological Society.

♦Kerski, Joseph J. (2006). Earth Visions: GIS in Indian Country. Winds of Change. American Indian Science and Engineering Society.

♦Kerski, Joseph J. (2007). GIS in Education. Chapter in Handbook of GIS. Blackwell Publishers.

♦Kerski, Joseph J. (2004). GIS for Citizenship Education, in Geography and Citizenship Education: Research Perspectives. A. Kent and A. Powell (Eds.) (pp. 129-138). London, UK: International Geographical Union Committee on Geographic Education by University of London Institute of Education.

♦Kerski, Joseph J. (2004). The Global GIS project: Spatial analysis for the world. Interaction, 32(3).

♦Kerski, Joseph J. (2003). The implementation and effectiveness of GIS in secondary education. Journal of Geography, 102(3), 128-137.

♦Kerski, Joseph J. (2002). Introducing Geography and Technology into Science through Biodiversity. Meridian: A Middle School Technology Journal, 5(1).

♦Kerski, Joseph J. (2006). Mapping for understanding our changing world. The Earth Scientist, 22(1), 6-10.

♦Kerski, Joseph J. (2008). Toward An International Education Community, and Challenges and Benefits to Teaching with Web-Based GIS. Two chapters in Digital Geography. Information Age Publishing.

♦Kerski, Joseph J., Linn, S. and Gindele, R. (2005). Mapping standardised test scores with other variables using GIS. International Research in Geographic and Environmental Education, 14(3), 231–236.

♦Kerski, Joseph J., Palmer, R. and Palmer, A. (2005, July). Jungle classroom—Geotechnology boosts education in Costa Rica’s lowland rainforest. GeoWorld, 18(7), 42-44.

♦Kita, S., & Ozyurek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16-32.

♦Kitayama, S., Duffy, S. & Uchida, Y. K. (2007). Self as cultural mode of being. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), The Handbook of Cultural Psychology (pp. 136-174). New York: Guilford Press.

♦Klein, I., Dubois, J., Mangin, J.-F., Kherif, F., Flandin, G., Poline, J.-B., Denis, M., Kosslyn, S. M., & Le Bihan, D. (2004). Retinotopic organization of visual mental images as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 26-31.

♦Klenk, M., Forbus, K., Tomai, E., Kim,H., and Kyckelhahn, B. 2005. Solving Everyday Physical Reasoning Problems by Analogy using Sketches. Proceedings of 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-05), Pittsburgh, PA.

♦Klippel, A., Freksa, C., & Winter, S. (2006). The danger of getting lost- YAH maps in emergencies. Journal of Spatial Sciences, 51, 1, 117-131.

♦Klippel, A., Knuf, L., Hommel, B., & Freksa, C. (2005). Perceptually induced distortions in cognitive maps. In C. Freksa, M. Knauff & B. Krieg-Brueckner (Eds.), Spatial Cognition IV. Reasoning, Action, and Interaction: International Conference Spatial Cognition 2004, Frauenchiemsee, Germany, October 11-13, 2004, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 204-213). Berlin: Springer.

♦Klippel, A., Lee, P. U., Fabrikant, S.I., Montello, D. R. & Bateman, J. (2005). The Cognitive Conceptual Approach as a Leitmotif for Map Design. Proceedings of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) 2005 Spring Symposium Series: Reasoning with Mental and External Diagrams: Computational Modeling and Spatial Assistance, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, Mar. 21-23, 2005, 90-95.

♦Klippel, A., & Montello, D. R. (to appear). Linguistic and nonlinguistic turn direction concepts. In S. Winter, M. Duckham, L. Kulik, & B. Kuipers (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory. Berlin: Springer.

♦Klippel, A., Tappe, H., Kulik, L., & Lee, P. U. (2005). Wayfinding choremes - A language for modeling conceptual route knowledge. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 16(4), 311-329.

♦Klippel, A., Tenbrink, T. and Montello, D. (in press). The Role of Structure and Function in the Conceptualization of Directions. In E. van der Zee and M. Vulchanova (Eds.), Motion Encoding in Language and Space. Oxford University Press.

♦Klippel, A., Worboys, M., & Duckham, M. (accepted). Identifying factors of geographic event conceptualization. International Journal of Geographical Information Science.

♦Knauff, M. (1999). The cognitive adequacy of Allen's interval calculus for qualitative spatial representation and reasoning. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 1, 261-290.

♦Knauff, M., Fangmeier, T., Ruff, C. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2003). Reasoning, models, and images: Behavioral measures and cortical activity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 559-573.

♦Knauff, M., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2002). Visual imagery can impede reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 30, 363-371.

♦Knauff, M., Jola, C., & Strube, G. (2001). Spatial reasoning: No need for visual information. In D. R. Montello (Ed.), Proceedings on the 6th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory, COSIT 2001 (pp. 759-765). Berlin: Springer.

♦Knauff, M., Kassubek, J., Mulack, T., & Greenlee, M. W. (2000). Cortical activation evoked by visual mental imagery as measured by functional MRI. NeuroReport, 11, 3957-3962.

♦Knauff, M., & May, E. (2006). Mental imagery, reasoning, and blindness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 161-177.

♦Knauff, M., Mulack, T., Kassubek, J., Salih, H. R., & Greenlee, M. W. (2002). Spatial imagery in deductive reasoning: A functional MRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 203-212.

♦Knauff, M., Schlieder, C., & Freksa, C. (2002). Spatial cognition: From rat-research to multifunctional spatial assistance systems. Künstliche Intelligenz, 3, 5-9.

♦Knauff, M., Strube, G., Jola, C., Rauh, R., & Schlieder, C. (2004). The psychological validity of qualitative spatial reasoning in one dimension. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 4, 167-188.

♦Kotovsky, L., & Gentner, D. (1996). Comparison and categorization in the development of relational similarity. Child Development, 67, 2797-2822.

♦Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M. & Mayer, R. (2002). Revisiting cognitive style dimension: evidence for two types of visualizers. Cognition & Instruction, 20, 37-77.

♦Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M. & Mayer, R. (2002). Visual/spatial abilities in problem solving in physics. In M. Anderson, B. Meyer & P. Olivier (Eds.), Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning (pp. 155-173). Springer-Verlag.

♦Kozhevnikov, M. & Hegarty, M. (2001). Dissociation between explicit and implicit beliefs about objects motion. Psychological Bulletin & Review, 8(3), 439-453.

♦Kozhevnikov, M. & Hegarty, M. (2001). Mental rotation and spatial orientation abilities. Memory & Cognition. 29(5), 745-756.

♦Kozhevnikov, M., Kosslyn, S., & Shephard, J. (2005). Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style. Memory and Cognition, 33, 710-726.

♦Kozhevnikov, M. & Motes, M. (In Press). Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cognitive Sciences.

♦Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M. Rasch, B. & Blajenkova, O. (2006). Perspective-taking vs. mental rotation transformations and how they predict spatial navigation performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 397-417.

♦Kozhevnikov, M. & Thornton, R. (2006). Real-time data display, spatial visualization ability, and learning force and motion concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15, 113-134.

♦Kuehne, S., Forbus, K., Gentner, D., & Quinn, B. (August 2000). SEQL: Category learning as progressive abstraction using structure mapping. Proceedings of CogSci-2000. Philadelphia, PA.

♦Kuhn, W., Worboys, M., & Timpf, S., eds., Spatial information theory: Foundations of geographic information science, LNCS 2825, Springer, Berlin, 2003.

♦Kuipers, B. (2000). The spatial semantic hierarchy. Artificial Intelligence, 119, 191-233. ♦Kurtz, K. J., Miao, C., & Gentner, D. (2001). Learning by analogical bootstrapping.

Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 417-446.

L ♦Laeng, B. & Peters, M. (1995). Cerebral Lateralization for the Processing of Spatial

Coordinates and Categories in Left- and Right-handers. Neuropsychologia, 33, 421-439. ♦Laeng, B., Peters, M., & McCabe, R. (1998). Memory for locations within regions:

Spatial biases and visual hemifield differences. Memory & Cognition, 26, 97-107. ♦Lakusta, L. & Landau, B. (2005). Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial

language. Cognition, 96, 1-33. ♦Lakusta, L., Wagner,L., O'Hearn, K., & Landau, B. (2007). Conceptual Foundations of

Spatial Language: Evidence for a Goal Bias in Infants. Language Learning and Development, 3(3), 179-197.

♦Lawton, C. A. (In press). Gender, spatial abilities, and wayfinding. In J. Chrisler & D. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology. New York: Springer.

♦Lawton, C. A. & Hatcher, D. W. (2005). Gender differences in integration of images in visuospatial memory. Sex Roles, 53, 717-725.

♦Lawton, C. A. & Kallai, J. (2002). Gender differences in wayfinding strategies and anxiety about wayfinding: A cross-cultural comparison. Sex Roles, 47, 389-401.

♦Lawton, C. A. & Morrin, K. A. (1999). Gender differences in pointing accuracy in computer-simulated 3D mazes. Sex Roles, 40, 73-92.

♦Lee, I., Griffin, A.L., Zilli, E.A., Eichenbaum, H., Hasselmo, M.E. (2006). Gradual translocation of spatial correlates of neuronal firing in the hippocampus toward prospective reward locations. Neuron, 51(5), 639-50.

♦Levin, D.T., & Simons, D.J. (2000). Fragmentation and continuity in motion pictures and the real world. Media Psychology, 2, 357-380.

♦Lew, A.R., Bremner, J.G., & Lefkovitch, L. (2000). The development of relational landmark use in 6- to 12-month-old infants in a spatial orientation task. Child Development, 71, 1179-1190.

♦Lew, A. R., Foster, K. A. & Bremner, J. G. (2006). Disorientation inhibits landmark use in 12-18-month-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 29, 334-341.

♦Lew, A. R., Foster, K., Bremner, J. G., Green, M. & Slavin, S. (2005). Detection of geometric but not topological transformations in 6-12-month-old infants in a visual exploration paradigm. Developmental Psychobiology, 47, 31-42.

♦Lew, A. R., Foster, K. A., Crowther, L. A. & Green, M. (2004). Indirect landmark use at 6 months of age in a spatial orientation task. Infant Behavior and Development, 27, 81-90.

♦Lew, A. R., Hopkins, B., Owen, L. H. & Green, M. (2007). Postural change effects on infants' AB task performance: visual, postural or spatial? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 1-13.

♦Liben, L. S., Kastens, K. A., & Stevenson, L. M. (2002). Real-world knowledge through real world maps: A developmental guide for navigating the educational terrain. Developmental Review, 22, 267-322.

♦Lidster, W. & Bremner, J.G. (1999). Interpretation and construction of coordinate dimensions by 4- to 5-year-old children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 189-201.

♦Liederman, J., Flannery, K.A., & Curley, J. (1997). Cryptorchidism (undescended testes): A common malformation associated with neurobehavioral abnormalities. Child Neuropsychology, 1, 1-13.

♦Linn, M. C. & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, Teachers, and Peers: Science Learning Partners. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

♦Linn, M.C., Lee, H.-S., Tinker, R., Husic, F., & Chiu, J.L. (2006). Teaching and Assessing Knowledge Integration in Science. Science, 313, 1049-1050.

♦Linn, M. C. & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498.

♦Linn, S., Kerski, J. and Wither, S. (2005). Development of Evaluation Tools for GIS: How Does GIS Affect Student Learning? International Research in Geographic and Environmental Education, 14(3), 217–224.

♦Liu, Q., Qiu, J., Chen, A.T., Yang, J., Zhang, Q.L. & Sun, H.-J. (2007). Effect of visual reliability on auditory-visual integration: An event-related potential study. NeuroReport, 18(17), 1861-1865.

♦Lockman, J. J. (2005). Tool use: Developmental and evolutionary considerations. In V. Roux, & B. Bril (Eds.) Stone Knapping : The necessary conditions for a uniquely hominid behaviour. McDonald Institute Monograph series. (pp. 319-330) London: Cambridge.

♦Lockwood, K., Forbus, K., & Usher, J. (2005). SpaceCase: A model of spatial preposition use. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Stressa, Italy.

♦Lockwood, K., Forbus, K., Halstead, D. & Usher, J. (2006). Automatic Categorization of Spatial Prepositions. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Vancouver, Canada.

♦Loewenstein, J., & Gentner, D. (2001). Spatial mapping in preschoolers: Close comparisons facilitate far mappings. Journal of Cognition & Development, 2, 189-219.

♦Loewenstein, J., & Gentner, D. (in press). Relational language and the development of relational mapping. Cognitive Psychology.

♦Logie, R. H., Della Sala, S., Beschin, N., & Denis, M. (2005). Dissociating mental transformations and visuo-spatial storage in working memory: Evidence from representational neglect. Memory, 13, 430-434.

♦Logie, R. H., & Denis, M. (Eds.) (1991). Mental images in human cognition. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

♦Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Golledge, R. G., & Philbeck, J. W. (1999). Human navigation by path integration. In R. G. Golledge (Ed.), Wayfinding: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes (pp. 125-151). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

♦Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Avraamides, M., Lippa, Y., & Golledge, R. G. (2007). Functional equivalence of spatial images produced by perception and spatial language. In F. Mast and L. Jäncke (Eds.), Spatial processing in navigation, imagery, and perception (pp. 29-48). New York: Springer.

♦Loomis, J. M., Golledge, R. G., Klatzky, R. L., & Marston, J. R. (2007). Assisting wayfinding in visually impaired travelers. In G. Allen (Ed.), Applied spatial cognition: From research to cognitive technology (pp. 179-202). Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

♦Lovett, A., Dehghani, M. & Forbus, K. (2008). Building and comparing qualitative descriptions of three-dimensional design sketches. Proceedings of the 22nd International Qualitative Reasoning Workshop. Boulder, CO.

♦Lovett, A., Forbus, K., & Usher, J. (2007). Using qualitative representations and analogical mapping to solve problems from a spatial intelligence test. Proceedings of the 21st International Qualitative Reasoning Workshop. Aberystwyth, U.K.

♦Lovett, A. Forbus, K., & Usher, J. (2007). Analogy with qualitative spatial representations can simulate solving Raven's Progressive Matrices. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Nashville, TN.

♦Lovett, A., Lockwood, K. & Forbus, K. (2008). Modeling cross-cultural performance on the visual oddity task. Proceedings of Spatial Cognition 2008. Freiburg, Germany.

♦Lozano, S. C. and Tversky, B. (2006). Communicative gestures facilitate problem solving for both communicators and recipients. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 47-63.

♦Lyon, D. R., Gunzelmann, G., & Gluck, K. A. (2008). A computational model of spatial visualization capacity. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 122-152.

M ♦MacDonald, S., Spetch. M.L., Kelly, D.M., & Cheng, K. (2004) Strategies in landmark

use by children, adults and marmoset monkeys. Learning and Motivation, 35, 322-347. ♦Maguire, M., Hirsh-Pasek & Golinkoff, R. (2006) A unified theory of word learning:

Putting verb acquisition in context. pp 364-392 In K. Hirsh-Pasek & R. Golinkoff, Action meets word: How children learn verbs. Oxford University Press.

♦Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D. B. M. & Levinson, S. C. (2004). Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 108-114.

♦Manning, C., Sera, M., & Pick, H. L. Jr. (2002). Understanding how we think about space: An examination of the meaning of English spatial prepositions. In K.R.Coventry & P. Olivier (Eds.), Spatial Language: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, (pp. 147 - 164). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

♦Manns, J.R., Zilli, E.A., Ong, K.C., Hasselmo, M.E., Eichenbaum, H. (2007). Hippocampal CA1 spiking during encoding and retrieval: Relation to theta phase. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 87(1), 9-20.

♦Mark, D.M., Freksa, C., Hirtle, S.C., Lloyd, R., and Tversky, B. (1999). Cognitive Models of Geographic Space. Int. J. of Geographical Information Science 13, 8, 747-774.

♦Matlock, T., Ramscar, M., & Boroditsky, L. (2005). The experiential link between spatial and temporal language. Cognitive Science, 29, 655-664.

♦May, M. (2007). Imaginal repositioning in everyday environments: Effects of testing method and setting. Psychological Research, 71, 277-287.

♦May, M. (2006). Raum (Space). In J. Funke & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbuch der Allgemeinen Psychologie: Kognition (pp. 66-74). Gvttingen: Hogrefe.

♦May, M. (2004). Imaginal perspective switches in remembered environments: Transformation versus interference accounts. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 163-206.

♦May, M. & Klatzky, R. L. (2000). Path integration while ignoring irrelevant movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 26, 169-186.

♦Maylor, E.A., Reimers, S., Choi, J., Collaer, M. L., Peters, M., & Silverman, I. (2007). Gender and Sexual orientation differences in cognition across adulthood: Age is kinder to women than to men regardress of sexual orientation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(2), 235-249.

♦McCloskey, M. (2004). Spatial representations and multiple-visual-systems hypotheses: Evidence from a developmental deficit in visual location and orientation processing. Cortex, 40, 677-694.

♦McCloskey, M. (2001). Spatial representation in mind and brain. In B. Rapp (Ed.), What deficits reveal about the human mind/brain: A handbook of cognitive neuropsychology (pp. 101-132). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

♦McCloskey, M. (in press). Visual reflections: A perceptual deficit and its implications. New York: Oxford University Press.

♦McCloskey, M., & Rapp, B. (2000). Attention-referenced visual representations: Evidence from impaired visual localization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 917-933.

♦McCloskey, M., Valtonen, J., & Sherman, J. (2006). Representing orientation: A coordinate-system hypothesis and evidence from developmental deficits. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 680-713.

♦Meilinger, T. (2008). The network of reference frames theory: A synthesis of graphs and cognitive maps. In C. Freksa, N.S. Newcombe, P. Gärdenfors & S. Wölfl (Eds.), Spatial Cognition VI (pp. 344-360). Berlin: Springer.

♦Meilinger, T., Knauff, M., & Bülthoff, H. (2008). Working memory in way-finding - a dual task experiment in a virtual city. Cognitive Science, 32, 755-770.

♦Melinger, A., & Kita, S. (in press/2007). Conceptualization load triggers gesture production. Language and Cognitive Processes.

♦Mellet, E., Bricogne, S., Crivello, F., Mazoyer, B., Denis, M., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2002). Neural basis of mental scanning of a topographic representation built from a text. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 1322-1330.

♦Mellet, E., Bricogne, S., Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Ghaëm, O., Petit, L., Zago, L., Etard, O., Berthoz, A., Mazoyer, B., & Denis M. (2000). Neural correlates of topographic mental exploration: The impact of route versus survey perspective learning. NeuroImage, 12, 588-600.

♦Mellet, E., Kosslyn, S. M., Mazoyer, N., Bricogne, S., Denis, M., & Mazoyer, B. (2000). Functional anatomy of high resolution mental imagery. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 98-109.

♦Mendoza, J.E., Elliott, D., Meegan, D.V., Lyons, J.L. & Welsh, T.N. (2006). The effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on the planning and control of manual aiming movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 413-422.

♦Millar, S. (2002). Imagery and Blindness: Comment on Z.W. Pylyshyn: "Mental Imagery: In search of a theory". Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(2), 201-202.

♦Millar, S. (2005). Network Models for Haptic Perception. Infant Behavior and Development, 28, 250-265.

♦Millar, S. (1997). Reading by Touch. London & N.Y.: Routledge [ISBN 0-415-06837-1].

♦Millar, S. (2008). Space and Sense. London & N.Y. Psychology Press. Taylor & Francis.

♦Millar, S. (2006). Spatial Processing of Information from Touch and Movement: Implications from and for Neuroscience. In M.A. Heller and S. Ballesteros (Eds.), Touch and Blindness: Psychology and Neuroscience (pp. 25-48). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

♦Millar, S. (1994). Understanding and Representing Space: Theory and evidence from studies with blind and sighted children. Oxford Science Publications. Oxford: Clarendon Press [ISBN 0 19 852142 1].

♦Millar, S. (1999). Veering revisited: Noise and posture cues in walking without sight. Perception, 28, 765-780.

♦Millar, S. & Al-Attar, Z. (2004). External and body-centred frames of reference in spatial memory: Evidence from touch. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(1) 51-59.

♦Millar, S. & Al-Attar, Z. (2001). Illusions in reading maps by touch: Reducing distance errors. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 643-657.

♦Millar, S. & Al-Attar, Z. (2002). Müller-Lyer illusions in touch and vision: Implications for Multisensory Processes. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(3), 353-365.

♦Millar, S. & Al-Attar, Z. (2003). Spatial reference and scanning with the left and right hand. Perception, 32, 1499-1511.

♦Millar, S. & Al-Attar, Z. (2000). Vertical and bisection bias in active touch. Perception, 29, 481-500.

♦Millar, S. & Al-Attar, Z. (2005). What aspects of vision facilitate haptic processing? Brain and Cognition, 59, 258-268.

♦Mittelberg, I. (fc.). Geometric and image-schematic patterns in gesture space. In V. Evans and P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions. London: Equinox.

♦Mittelberg, I. (fc.). Peicean semiotics meets conceptual metaphor: Iconic modes in gestural representations of grammar. In A. Cienki and C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

♦Mittelberg, I. (2002). The Visual Memory of Grammar: Iconographical and Metaphorical Insights. Metaphorik.de, 2, 69-89.

♦Mittelberg, I. and L. R. Waugh (fc.). Multimodal figures of thought: A cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor and metonymy in co-speech gesture. In C. Forceville and E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

♦Mohler, B. J., Thompson, W. B., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Pick, H. L, Jr, & Warren, W. H. (2007). Visual flow influences gait transition speed and preferred walking speed. Experimental Brain Research, ISSN (Online) 1432-1106, ISSN (Print) 0014-4819.

♦Montello, D. R. (2005). Navigation. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 257-294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

♦Montello, D. R. (2001). Spatial cognition. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 14771-14775). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

♦Montello, D. R., Fabrikant, S. I., Ruocco, M. & Middleton, R. S. (2003). Testing the First Law of Cognitive Geography on Point-Display Spatializations. In W. Kuhn, M. Worboys, & S. Timpf (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory: Foundations of Geographic Information Science. Proceedings of the Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT '03). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2825 (pp. 316-331). Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.

♦Montello, D. R., Lovelace, K. L., Golledge, R. G., & Self, C. M. (1999). Sex-related differences and similarities in geographic and environmental spatial abilities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89, 515-534.

♦Montello, D. R., Waller, D., Hegarty, M., & Richardson, A. E. (2004). Spatial memory of real environments, virtual environments, and maps. In G. L. Allen (Ed.), Human spatial memory: Remembering where (pp. 251-285). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

♦Moore, S. D. and Brady, J.A. (2007). Lessons Learned from the ITEST Ocean Explorers Project. In ESRI Education Users Conference. San Diego, California: ESRI.

♦Moratz, R. and Tenbrinkk, T. (2006). Spatial reference in linguistic human-robot interaction: Iterative, empirically supported development of a model of projective relations. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 6(1), 63-106.

♦Motes, M., Finlay, C. & Kozhevnikov, M. (2006). Scene movement versus observer movement in scene recognition: A test of the spatial updating hypothesis. Perception, 35, 1507-1520.

N ♦Nardini, M., Atkinson, J., & Burgess, N. (in press). Children reorient using the left /

right sense of coloured landmarks at 18-24 months. Cognition. ♦Nardini M., Burgess N., Breckenridge K., Atkinson J. (2006). Differential

developmental trajectories for egocentric, environmental and intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Cognition, 101, 153-172.

♦Novick, L. R. (2001). Spatial diagrams: Key instruments in the toolbox for thought. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, Vol. 40 (pp. 279-325). San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press.

O ♦Oakes, L. M., & Ribar, R. J. (in press). A comparison of infants' categorization in paired

and successive presentation familiarization tasks. Infancy. ♦Oliva, A., Torralba, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2003). Top down

control of visual attention in object detection. IEEE Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing, Vol I, 253-256.

♦Olson, D. R., & Bialystok, E. (1983). Spatial cognition: The structure and development of the mental representation of spatial relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

♦Orion, N., Ben-Chaim, D., and Kali, Y. (1997). Relationship between Earth science education and spatial visualization. Journal of Geoscience Education, 45, 129-132.

♦Otto, A.R., Gureckis, T.M., Love, B.C. & Markman, A.B. (in press, 2009). Navigating through Abstract Decision Spaces: Evaluating the Role of State Knowledge in a Dynamic Decision-Making Task. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.

P ♦Pack, C., Grossberg, S. and Mingolla, E. (2001). A neural model of smooth pursuit

control and motion perception by cortical area MST. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 102-120.

♦Parish, J., Ma, W., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R.M. (in press) A world of relations: Relational words. In B. Malt & P. Wolf. Words and the world: How words capture the human experience. Oxford University Press.

♦Perry, M., Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1988). Transitional knowledge in the acquisition of concepts. Cognitive Development, 3, 359-400.

♦Péruch, P., Belingard, L., & Thinus-Blanc, C. (2000). Transfer of spatial knowledge from virtual to real environments. In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition II (pp. 253-264), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

♦Péruch, P., Chabanne, V., Nesa, M.-P., Thinus-Blanc, C., & Denis, M. (2006). Comparing distances in mental images constructed from visual experience or verbal descriptions: The impact of survey versus route perspective. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1950-1967.

♦Péruch, P., Gaunet, F., Thinus-Blanc, C., & Loomis, J. (2000). Understanding and learning virtual spaces. In R. M. Kitchin & S. Freundschuh (Eds.), Cognitive Mapping: Past, Present and Future (pp. 108-124). London: Routledge.

♦Péruch, P., & Wilson, P. N. (2004). Active versus passive learning and testing in a complex outside built environment. Cognitive Processing, 5, 218-227.

♦Peters, M. (1997). Sex differences in intercepting a moving target by throw or button press. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 290-296.

♦Peters, M., Chisholm, P., & Laeng, B. (1995). Spatial ability, student gender and academic performance. Journal of Engineering Education, 84, 69-73.

♦Peters, M., Laeng, B., Latham, K., Jackson, M., Zaiyouna, R. & Richardson, C. (1995). A Redrawn Vandenberg & Kuse Mental Rotations Test: Different Versions and Factors that affect Performance. Brain and Cognition, 28, 39-58.

♦Peters, M., Lehmann, W., Takahira, S., Takeuchi, Y., & Jordan, K. (2006). Mental Rotation Test performance in four cross-cultural samples (n = 3367): Overall Sex differences and the role of Academic Program in performance. Cortex, 42(7), 1005-1014.

♦Peters, M., Manning, J. T., & Reimers, S. (2007). The effects of sex, sexual orientation, and digit ratio (2D:4D) on mental rotation performance. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(2), 251-260.

♦Peterson, S. & Simon, T.J. (2000) Computational evidence for the subitizing phenomenon as an emergent property of the human cognitive architecture. Cognitive Science, 24, 93-112.

♦Philbeck, J. W., Behrmann, M., Levy, L. & Potolicchio, Jr., S. J., & Caputy, A. J. (2004). Path integration deficits during linear locomotion after human medial temporal lobectomy. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(4), 510-520.

♦Philbeck, J. W., Klatzky, R. K., Behrmann, M., Loomis, J. M., & Goodridge, J. (2001). Active control of locomotion facilitates non-visual navigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 141-153.

♦Philbeck, J. W., & Loomis, J. M. (1997). Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 72-85.

♦Piburn, M., Reynolds, S., McAuliffe, C., Leedy, D., Birk, J. & Johnson, J. (2005). The role of visualization in learning from computer-based images. International Journal of Science Education, 27(5) 513-527.

♦Pick, H.L. Jr. (2007). History of research on blindness and brain plasticity. In J. J. Rieser, Ashmead, D. H., Ebner, F., & Corn, A. L. (Eds.), Blindness and Brain Plasticity in Navigation and Object Perception. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

♦Pick, H. L., Jr., Rieser, J. J., Wagner, D., & Garing, A. E. (1999). The recalibration of rotational locomotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1179-1188.

♦Plumert, J. M., & Hawkins, A. M. (2001). Biases in young children's communication about spatial relations: Containment versus proximity. Child Development, 72, 22-36.

♦Plumert, J. M., & Spencer, J. P. (2007). The emerging spatial mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

♦Pribe, C., Grossberg, S., and Cohen, M.A. (1997). Neural control of interlimb oscillations, II: Biped and quadruped gaits and bifurcations. Biological Cybernetics, 77, 141-152.

♦Proffitt, D.R. (2006). Distance perception. Current Directions in Psychological Research, 15, 131-135.

♦Proffitt, D.R. (2006). Embodied perception and the economy of action. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 1, 110-122.

♦Pruden, S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. (in press) Current events: How infants parse events for language. In T. Shipley & J. Zachs (Eds.) Events. New York: Oxford University Press.

♦Pulverman, R., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Sootsman Buresh, J. (2008). Manners matter: Infants' attention to manner and path in non-linguistic dynamic events. Cognition, 108, 825-830.

♦Pulverman, R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Pruden, S., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2006). Precursors to verb learning: Infant attention to manner and path. pp.134-160 In K. Hirsh-Pasek & R. M. Golinkoff (Eds.), Action meets word: How children learn verbs. New York: Oxford Press.

Q ♦Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2003). The mental-cutting test "Schnitte" and the Picture-Rotation-

Test: Two new measures to assess spatial ability. International Journal of Testing, 3, 219-231.

♦Quaiser-Pohl, C., Geiser, C., & Lehmann, W. (2006). The relationship between computer-game preference, gender, and mental-rotation ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 609-619.

♦Quaiser-Pohl, C. & Jordan, K. (2004/2007). (Ed.). Warum Frauen glauben, sie könnten nicht einparken: und Männer ihnen Recht geben. München: C.H. Beck/dtv.

♦Quaiser-Pohl, C. & Lehmann, W. (2002). Girls' spatial abilities: Charting the contributions of experience and attitudes in different academic groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 245-260.

♦Quaiser-Pohl, C., Lehmann, W. & Eid, M. (2004). The relationship between spatial abilities and representations of large-scale space in children: A structural-equation-modelling analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 95-107.

R ♦Ragni, M. Knauff, M., & Nebel, B. (2005). A Computational Model for Spatial

Reasoning with Mental Models. In B. G. Bara & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp. 1797-1802). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

♦Rapp, D. N., Culpepper, S. A., Kirkby, K., & Morin, P. (in press). Fostering students' comprehension of topographic maps. Journal of Geoscience Education.

♦Rapp, D. N., Klug, J. L., & Taylor, H. A. (2006). Character movement and the representation of space during narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1206-1220.

♦Rapp, D. N., & Taylor, H. A. (2004). Interactive dimensions in the construction of mental representations for text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 988-1001.

♦Rapp, D. N., & Uttal, D. H. (2006). Understanding and enhancing visualizations: Two models of collaboration between earth science and cognitive science. In C. A. Manduca & D. W. Mogk (Eds.), Earth and Mind: How Geologists Think and Learn About the Earth (pp. 121-127). Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America Press.

♦Rauh, R., Hagen, C., Knauff, M., Kuß, T., Schlieder, C., & Strube, G. (2005). Preferred and Alternative Mental Models in Spatial Reasoning. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5, 239-269.

♦Redish, A.D. (1999). Beyond the Cognitive Map: From Place Cells to Episodic Memory, MIT Press.

♦Redish, A. D., Rosenzweig, E. S., Bohanick, J. D., McNaughton,B. L., Barnes, C. A. (2000). Hippocampal ensemble activity realignment: Time vs. space. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(24), 9289-9309.

♦Redish, A.D. and Touretzky, D.S. (1997). Cognitive Maps beyond the Hippocampus. Hippocampus, 7(1), 15-35.

♦Reed, S. K. (2006). Cognitive architectures for multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 41, 87-98.

♦Reed, S. K. (2005). From research to practice and back: The Animation Tutor project. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 55-82.

♦Reed, S. K. (2008). Manipulating multimedia materials. In R. Z. Zheng (Ed.), Cognitive effects of multimedia learning (pp. 51-66). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

♦Reed, S. K. (January, 2010). Thinking visually. New York: Taylor & Francis. ♦Reed, S. K. & Hoffman, B. (January, 2010). Animation Tutor [Instructional software].

New York: Taylor & Francis. ♦Reed, S. K. & Hoffman, B. (2004). Use of temporal and spatial information in

estimating event completion time. Memory & Cognition, 32, 271-282. ♦Regier, T. (1996). The human semantic potential: Spatial language and constrained

connectionism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ♦Regier, T., & Carlson, L.A. (2001). Grounding spatial language in perception: An

empirical and computational investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 130, 273-298.

♦Regier, T., Kay, P., & Khetarpal, N. (2007). Color naming reflects optimal partitions of color space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 1436-1441. (2007).

♦Renz, J., Qualitative spatial reasoning with topological information, LNAI 2293, Springer, Berlin, 2002.

♦Reynolds, S.J., Johnson, J.K., Piburn, M.D., Leedy, D.E, Coyan, J.A., & Busch, M.M. (2005). Visualization in undergraduate geology courses. In Gilbert, J.K., (Ed.) Visualization in Science Education. Springer.

♦Reynolds, S., Piburn, M., Johnson J., Leedy, D., Coyan, J., & Busch, M. (2004). The Hidden Earth Curriculum Project: Spatial Visualization in Undergraduate Geoscience Courses. In Invention and Impact: Building Excellence in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education. Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

♦Reynolds, S., Piburn, M., Leedy, D., McAuliffe, C., Birk, J. & Johnson, J. (2006). The Hidden Earth: Interactive, computer-based modules for geoscience learning. In Manduca, C. & Mogk, D. (Eds.). Earth and Mind: How Geologists Think and Learn About the Earth. Geological Society of America.

♦Riecke, B. E., Cunningham, D. W. & Bülthoff, H. H. (2006). Spatial updating in virtual reality: The sufficiency of visual information. Psychological Research, 71(3), 298-313.

♦Riecke, B. E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., Avraamides, M. N., von der Heyde, M. & Bülthoff, H. H. (2006). Cognitive factors can influence self-motion perception (vection) in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 3(3), 194-216.

♦Riecke, B.E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., Caniard, F., & Bülthoff, H.H. (2005). Towards lean and elegant self-motion simulation in Virtual Reality. Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality, 131-138.

♦Riecke, B.E. and von der Heyde, M. (2002). Qualitative Modeling of Spatial Orientation Processes using Logical Propositions: Interconnecting Spatial Presence, Spatial Updating, Piloting, and Spatial Cognition (Technical Report 100). Tübingen, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics.

♦Riecke, B., von der Heyde, M. and Bülthoff, H. (2005). Visual cues can be sufficient for triggering automatic, reflex-like spatial updating. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 2(3), 183-215.

♦Riecke, B.E., van Veen, H.A.H.C. and Bülthoff, H.H. (2002). Visual homing is possible without landmarks: A Path Integration Study in Virtual Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 11(5), 443-473.

♦Rieser, J. J. & Pick, H. L. Jr. (2007). Perception-Action-Representation Systems and Using Movement to Update Spatial Orientation: What changes with learning and development? In Plumert, J.M. & Spencer, J.P. (Eds.), The Emerging Spatial Mind. New York: Oxford.

♦Rieser, J.J. and Pick, H.L. Jr. (2002). The Perception and Representation of Human Locomotion. In W. Prinz and B. Hommel (Eds.), Attention and Performance XIX: Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action. Attention and performance XIX. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

♦Rinck, M., & Denis, M. (2004). The metrics of spatial distance traversed during mental imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1211-1218.

♦Robertson, L.C. (2003). Binding, spatial attention and perceptual awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 93-102.

♦Robertson, L.C. (2004). Space, Objects, Minds and Brains. New York: Psychology Press (Francis & Taylor).

♦Robertson, L.C. & Brooks, J.L. (2006). Feature detection and spatial deficits. Visual Cognition, 14, 851-862.

♦Robertson, L.C. & Kim, M.S. (1998). Effects of perceived space on spatial attention. Psychological Science, 10, 76-79.

♦Rochat, P., & Hespos, S.J. (1996). Tracking and anticipation of invisible spatial transformation by 4-8-month-old infants, Cognitive Development, 11, 3-17.

♦Rosenzweig, E. S., Redish, A. D., McNaughton, B. L., Barnes,C. A. (2003). Hippocampal map realignment and spatial learning. Nature Neuroscience, 6(6), 609-615.

♦Ruddle, R. A. (2008). Generating trails automatically, to aid navigation when you revisit an environment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 17, 562-574.

♦Ruddle, R. A. (2009). How do people find information on a familiar website?. Proceedings of the 23rd BCS Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI'09), 262-268.

♦Ruddle, R. A. & Lessels, S. (2009). The benefits of using a walking interface to navigate virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 16(1), 1-18. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1502800.1502805.

♦Ruddle, R. A., Payne, S. J. & Jones, D. M. (1997). Navigating buildings in "desk-top" virtual environments: Experimental investigations using extended navigational experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 143-159.

♦Ruddle, R. A., & Péruch, P. (2004). Effects of proprioceptive feedback and environmental characteristics on spatial learning in virtual environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60, 299-326.

♦Rüsseler, J., Scholz, J., Jordan, K., & Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2005). Mental rotation of letters, pictures and three-dimensional objects in German dyslexic children. Journal of Child Neuropsychology, 11, 497-512.

S ♦Sampanes, A.C., Tseng, P. and Bridgeman, B. (2008). The role of gist in scene

recognition. Vision Research, 48, 2275-2283. ♦Sanchez, C. A, & Wiley, J. (2007). Spatial Abilities and Learning Complex Scientific

Topics. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. ♦Sander, E., Quaiser-Pohl, C. & Stigler, C. (2007, under review). Mental-Rotation

Ability of East and West German Students: The Role of Experiential and Attitudinal Factors (Revised, Manuscript submitted for publication).

♦Sargent, J., Dopkins, S., Philbeck, J., & Arthur, J. (2008). Exploring the process of progressive disorientation. Acta Psychologica, 129, 234-242.

♦Sargent, J., Dopkins, S., Philbeck, J. & Modarres, R. (2008). Spatial memory during progressive disorientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 34(3), 602-615.

♦Sathian, K., Simon, T.J., Peterson, S., Patel, G., Hoffman, J.M., & Grafton, S.T. (1999) Neural evidence linking object enumeration and visual attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 36-51.

♦Schaal, A., Uttal, D., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Levine, S. C. (2005, May). Children's gestures provide insight into their mental representation of space. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Psychological Association, Chicago.

♦Schmitzer-Torbert, N.C. (2007). Place- and response-learning in human virtual navigation: Behavioral measures and gender differences. Behavioral Neuroscience, 121(2), 277-290.

♦Schmitzer-Torbert, N.C., and Redish, A.D. (2004). Neuronal activity in the rodent dorsal striatum in sequential navigation: Separation of spatial and reward responses on the multiple T task. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91(5), 2259-72.

♦Schneider, V. I., Healy, A. F. & Barshi, I. (2004). Effects of instruction modality and readback on accuracy in following navigation commands. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 245-257.

♦Scholl, B.J., & Pylyshyn, Z.W. (1999). Tracking multiple items though occlusion: Clues to visual objecthood. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 259-290.

♦Schwering, A., Bauer, C., Đorčeva, I., Gust, H., Krumnack, U. & Kühnberger, K.-U. (2009). The Impact of Gestalt Principles on Solving Geometric Proportional Analogies. In the Proceedings of the 2nd International Analogy Conference (ANALOGY09) Sofia, Bulgaria, 404-413.

♦Schwering, A., Kühnberger, K.-U., Krumnack, U. & Gust, H. (2009). Spatial Cognition of Geometric Figures in the Context of Proportional Analogies. In the Proceedings of the Conference on Spatial Information Theory (Cosit 09) Aber Wrac'h, France, 18-35.

♦Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H. (2008). Reading space into numbers - A cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect. Cognition, 108(2), 590-599.

♦Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: a 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 604-614.

♦Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.

♦Sibley, D.F. (2005). Visual abilities and misconceptions about plate tectonics. Journal Geoscience Education, 53, 471-477.

♦Siegle, J., Campos J.L., Mohler, B.J., Loomis, J.M. & Bülthoff, H.H (2009). High-precision capture of perceived self-velocity during passive translations. Experimental Brain Research, 195, 429-444.

♦Silverman, I., Choi, J., & Peters, M. (2007). The hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: Data from 40 countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(2), 261-268.

♦Simon, T.J. (1998) Computational evidence for the foundations of numerical competence. Developmental Science, 1, 71-78.

♦Simon, T.J. (1997) Reconceptualizing the origins of number knowledge: A "non-numerical" account. Cognitive Development, 12, 349-372.

♦Simon, T.J., Bearden, C.E., McDonald-McGinn, D., & Zackai, E. (2005) Visuospatial and numerical cognitive deficits in children with Chromosome 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome. Cortex, 41: 131-141.

♦Simon, T.J. & Vaishnavi, S. (1996) Subitizing & counting depend on different attentional mechanisms: Evidence from visual enumeration in afterimages. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 915-926.

♦Singer, M. A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Children learn when their teachers' gestures and speech differ. Psychological Science, 16, 85-89.

♦Smith, M., Piburn, M. & Reynolds,S.(1999). Research for Earth Science Learning. Geotimes, 44,27, 35.

♦Spence, C., & Driver, J. (Eds.) (2004). Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

♦Spence, C., Pavani, F., Maravita, A., & Holmes, N. (in press). Multisensory contributions to the representation of peripersonal space in humans: Evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. To appear in M. Lin (Ed.), Haptic rendering: Foundations, algorithms, and applications. Wellesley, MA: AK Peters.

♦Spence, I. (1990). Visual psychophysics of simple graphical elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Performance and Perception, 16, 683-692.

♦Spence, I. & Krizel, P. (1994). Children's perception of proportion in graphs. Child Development, 65, 1193-1213.

♦Spence, I., & Lewandowsky, S. (1989). Robust multidimensional scaling. Psychometrika, 54, 501-513.

♦Spetch, M.L. & Kelly, D.M. (2006). Comparative spatial cognition: Processes in landmark and surface-based place finding. In E. Wasserman and T. Zentall (Eds.), Comparative Cognition: Experimental Explorations of Animal Intelligence (pp. 210-228). Oxford University Press.

♦Spetch, M.L. & Parent, M.B. (2006). Age and sex differences in children's spatial search strategies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 807-812.

♦S. Srinivas (2007). Influence of Affect on Wayfinding. Conference on Spatial Information Theory, Melbourne, Australia, 2007. Doctoral Colloquium.

♦S. Srinivas, S. C. Hirtle (2006). Knowledge Based Schematization of Route Directions. In M. Raubal, H. J. Miller, A. U. Frank, M. F. Goodchild (Eds.), Geographic Information Science, Fourth International Conference, GIScience 2006, Extended Abstracts (pp. 28). IfGI prints.

♦S. Srinivas, S.C. Hirtle (2006). Knowledge Based Schematization of Route Directions. In T. Barkowsky, M. Knauff, G. Ligozat, D. Montello (Eds.), Spatial Cognition V, LNAI 4387. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

♦Stern, E., Aprea, C., & Ebner, H. G. (2003). Improving cross-content transfer in text processing by means of active graphical representation. Learning and Instruction, 13, 191-203.

♦Stollinski, R., Schwering, A., Kühnberger, K.-U. & Krumnack, U. (2009). Structural Alignment of Visual Stimuli Influences Human Object Categorization. In the Proceedings of the 2nd International Analogy Conference (ANALOGY09) Sofia, Bulgaria, 433-442.

♦Sturz, B. R., Bodily, K. D. & Katz, J. S. (2006). Evidence against integration of spatial maps in humans. Animal Cognition, 9, 207-217.

♦Sturz, B. R., Bodily, K. D., Katz, J. S. & Kelly, D. M. (in press). Evidence against integration of spatial maps in humans: Generality across real and virtual environments. Animal Cognition.

♦Sturz, B. R., Brown, M. F. & Kelly, D. M. (in press). Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: Implications for theoretical accounts of spatial learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

♦Sturz, B. R. & Katz, J. S. (in press). Learning of absolute and relative distance and direction from discrete visual landmarks by pigeons (Columba livia). Journal of Comparative Psychology.

♦Sun, H.-J., Campos, J. L. & Chan, G. S. W. (2004). Multisensory integration in the estimation of relative path length. Experimental Brain Research, 154, 246-254.

♦Sun, H.-J., Campos, J. L., Chan, G. S. W. Young, M., & Ellard, C. (2004). The contributions of static visual cues, nonvisual cues and optic flow in distance estimation. Perception, 33, 49-65.

♦Sun, H.-J., Chan, G. S. W., & Campos, J. L. (2004). Active navigation and orientation-free spatial representations. Memory and Cognition, 32, 51-71.

♦Sun, H.-J., & Frost, B. J. (1998). Computation of different optical variables of looming objects in pigeon nucleus rotundus neurons. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 296-303. Written up in "News and Views" section of Nature Neuroscience, 1, 261-263.

T ♦Takayama, K. (2005). Teaching visualizing the science of genomics. In John K. Gilbert

(Ed.), Visualization in Science Education. Dordrecht: Springer, pp 217-251. ♦Tao, WD, Liu, Q., Huang, XT, Tao, XL, Yan, JJ, Teeter, CJ, Li, H. & Sun, H-J. (2008).

Effect of degree and direction of rotation in egocentric mental rotation of hand: An event-related potential study. NeuroReport, 19.

♦Tartre, L.A. (1990). Spatial orientation skill and mathematical problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(3), pp. 216- 229.

♦Tartre, L.A. (1990). Spatial skills, gender and mathematics. In E. Fennema and G. Leder (Eds.), Mathematics and Gender (pp. 27- 59). New York: Teachers' College Press.

♦Tartre, L.A. & Fennema, E. (1995). Mathematics achievement and gender: A longitudinal study of selected cognitive and affective factors [grades 6 to 12]. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 28(3), 199-217.

♦Taylor, H. A., Brunye, T. T. & Taylor, S. (in press). Wayfinding and navigation: Mental representation and implications for navigational system design. To appear in C. M. Carswell (Ed.), Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Volume 4. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

♦Taylor, H. A., & Rapp, D. N. (2006). Updating human spatial memory. In M. F. Brown and R. G. Cook (Eds.), Animal Spatial Cognition: Comparative, Neural, and Computational Approaches.

♦Taylor, H. A., & Rapp, D. N. (2004). Where's the donut? Factors influencing spatial reference frame use. Cognitive Processing: The International Quarterly of Cognitive Science, 5, 175-188.

♦Tenbrink, T. (2007). Space, time, and the use of language: An investigation of relationships. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

♦Tenbrink, T. and Wiener, J. (in press). The Verbalization of Multiple Strategies in the Traveling Salesman Problem. Cognitive Processing. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-008-0225-z

♦Thomson, R. & Davies, J. (in press, 2009). Distance Estimation as a Process of Generating Ad-Hoc Metrical Systems. Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

♦Tom, A., & Denis, M. (2004). Language and spatial cognition: Comparing the roles of landmarks and street names in route instructions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1213-1230.

♦Tomai, E., Lovett, A., Forbus, K., & Usher, J. (2005). A Structure Mapping Model for Solving Geometric Analogy Problems. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Stressa, Italy, 2190-2195.

♦Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M.S., & Henderson, J.M. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113, 766-786.

♦Turnbull, D. (1994). Maps are territories, science is an atlas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

♦Tversky, B. (In press). Communicating with diagrams and gestures. In C. Najaran (Editor).

♦Tversky, B. (2005). Functional significance of visuospatial representations. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Editors.), Handbook of higher-level visuospatial thinking. 1-34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

♦Tversky, B. (2007). Gestalts of thought. In L. Albertazzi (Ed.), Visual thought (pp. 155-163). Amsterdam: Benjamin.

♦Tversky, B. (2005). Some ways images express and promote thought. In P. Grialou, G. Longo, and M. Okada, Image and reasoning. Pp. 15-29. Tokyo: Keio University Press.

♦Tversky, B. (In press). Spatial cognition: Situated and embodied. In P. Robbins and M. Aydede (Editor). Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

♦Tversky, B. (2005). Visuospatial reasoning. In K. Holyoak and R. Morrison, (Editors). Handbook of Reasoniong (pp. 209-249). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

♦Tversky, B., Agrawala, M., Heiser, J., Lee, P. U., Hanrahan, P., Phan, D., Stolte, C., Daniele, M.-P. (In press). Cognitive design principles for automated generation of visualizations. In G. Allen (Editor). Applied spatial cognition: From research to cognitive technology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

♦Tversky, B., Heiser, J., Lozano, S., MacKenzie, R., and Morrison, J. (In press). Enriching animations. In R. Lowe and W. Schnotz (Editors). Learning with animation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

♦Tversky, B. and Lozano, S. C. Gestures augment learning in communicators and recipients. In K. Coventry, T. Tenbrink, and J. Bateman (Editors), Spatial language and dialogue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

U ♦Uttal, D. (2000). Seeing the big picture: Map use and the development of spatial

cognition. Developmental Science, 3, 247-286. ♦Uttal, D. H. (in press). Maps and spatial thinking: Developmental, cultural and historical

perspectives. To appear in L. Namy (Ed.), Symbols and thought: Proceedings of the Emory cognition conference. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.

♦Uttal, D. (2000). Seeing the big picture: Map use and the development of spatial cognition. Developmental Science, 3, 247-286.

♦Uttal, D. H., Fisher, J. A., & Taylor, H. A. (in press). Words and maps: Developmental changes in mental models of spatial information acquired from depictions and descriptions. Developmental Science.

♦Uttal, D. H., & Wellman, H. M. (1989). Young children's representation of spatial information acquired from maps. Developmental Psychology, 25, 128-138.

V ♦Valtonen, J., Dilks, D. D., & McCloskey, M. (2008). Cognitive representation of

orientation: A case study. Cortex, in press. ♦Varley, R., Klessinger, N., Romanowski, C. & Siegal, M. (2005). Agrammatic but

numerate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 3519-3524. ♦Varley, R. & Siegal, M. (2000). Evidence for cognition without grammar from causal

reasoning and "theory of mind" in an agrammatic aphasic patient. Current Biology, 10, 723-726.

♦Varley, R., Siegal, M. & Want, S. (2001). Severe impairment in grammar does not preclude theory of mind. Neurocase, 7, 489-493.

♦Vasilyeva, M. (2002). Solving spatial tasks with unaligned layouts: The difficulty of dealing with conflicting information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 291-303.

♦Vasilyeva, M., Duffy, S. & Huttenlocher, J. (2007). Developmental changes in the use of absolute and relative information: The case of spatial extent. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8, 455-471.

♦Vasilyeva, M. & Huttenlocher, J. (2004). Early development of scaling ability. Developmental Psychology, 40, 682-690.

♦Verges, M. & Duffy, S. (under review). Spatial representations elicit dual-coding effects in mental imagery. Cognitive Science.

♦Vorwerg, C. and Tenbrink,T. (2007). Discourse factors influencing spatial descriptions in English and German. In T. Barkowsky, M. Knauff, G. Ligozat, and D. Montello (Eds.), Spatial Cognition V: Reasoning, Action, Interaction (pp. 470–488). Berlin: Springer.

♦Vosmik, J.R., & Presson, C.C. (2004). Children's response to natural map misalignment during wayfinding. Journal of Cognition & Development, 5, 317-336.

♦Voyer, D., Postma, A., Brake, B., & Imperato-McGinley, J. (2007). Gender differences in object location memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 23-38.

♦Voyer, D., Butler, T., Cordero, J., Brake, B., Silbersweig, D., Stern, E., & Imperato-McGinley, J. (2006). The Relation between Computerized and Paper-and-Pencil Mental Rotation Tasks: A Validation Study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 928-939.

♦Voyer, D. & Hou, J. (2006). Type of items and the magnitude of gender differences on the Mental Rotations Test. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 91-100.

W ♦Wagner, L., A. Yocom, M. Greene-Havas (in press). Children's Understanding of

Directed Motion Events in an Imitation Choice Task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.

♦Wagner, S.,M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). The role of gesture in learning: Do children use their hands to change their minds? Journal of Cognition and Development.

♦Wagner, S. M., Nusbaum, H., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2004). Probing the mental representation of gesture: Is handwaving spatial? Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 395-407.

♦Waller, D., Bachmann, E., Hodgson, E., & Beall, A. C. (in press). The HIVE: A Huge Immersive Virtual Environment for research in spatial cognition. Behavior Research Methods.

♦Waller, D., Beall, A., & Loomis, J. M. (2004). Using virtual environments to assess directional knowledge. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 157-163.

♦Waller, D., & Hodgson, E. (2006). Transient and enduring spatial representations under disorientation and self-rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 867–882.

♦Waller, D., Knapp, D., & Hunt, E. (2001). Spatial representations of virtual mazes: The role of visual fidelity and individual differences. Human Factors, 43, 147 - 158.

♦Waller, D., Loomis, J. M., Golledge, R. G., & Beall, A. C. (2000). Place learning in humans: The role of distance and direction information. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2, 333-354.

♦Waller, D., Loomis, J. M., & Steck, S. D. (2003). Inertial cues do not enhance knowledge of environmental layout. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 987-993.

♦Wang, R. F., & Spelke, E. (2002). Human spatial representation: Insights from animals. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 376-382.

♦Weckbacher, L. M. (2006). The role of spatial activities in gifted youths' spatial understanding. Unpublished master's thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara.

♦Weckbacher, L. M. (2007). The role of visualization in geometric problem solving. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.

♦Weckbacher, L. M. & Okamoto, Y. (2009). Exploring the relation between spatial Experience and spatial ability among high academic achievers. Poster presented at The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, California.

♦Welsh, T.N. & Elliott, D. (2004). Movement trajectories in the presence of a distracting stimulus: Evidence for a response activation model of selective reaching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology – Section A, 57, 1031-1057.

♦Welsh, T.N., Higgins, L., Ray, M. & Weeks, D.J. (2007). Seeing vs. believing: Is believing sufficient to activate the processes of response co-representation? Human Movement Science, 26, 853-866.

♦Welsh, T.N. & Pratt, J. (2008). Actions modulate attentional capture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 968-976.

♦Welsh, T.N., Lyons, J., Weeks, D.J., Anson, J.G., Chua, R., Mendoza, J.E. & Elliott, D. (2007). Within- and between-nervous system inhibition of return: Observation is as good as performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 950-956.

♦Welsh, T.N., Ray, M., Weeks, D.J., Dewey, D. & Elliott, D. (2009). Does Joe influence Fred’s action? Not if Fred has autism spectrum disorder. Brain Research, 1248, 141-148.

♦Wetzel, J. & Forbus, K. (2009, February). Automated Critique of Engineering Design Explanations. Poster presented at the Second Annual Inter-Science of Learning Center Conference, Seattle, WA.

♦Wetzel, J. (2008). Design Buddy: Sketch-Understanding Software as a Tool for Engineering Design Education. Poster presented at the 2008 inter-Science of Learning Centers Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.

♦Wetzel, J. and Forbus, K. (2008). Integrating Open-Domain Sketch Understanding with Qualitative Two-Dimensional Rigid-Body Mechanics. Proceedings of the 22nd International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning. Boulder, CO.

♦Wiedenbauer, G., & Jansen-Osmann, P. (2006). Spatial knowledge of children with spina bifida in a virtual large scale space. Brain and Cognition, 62, 120-127.

♦Wiener, J., & Tenbrink, T. (2008). Traveling salesman problem: The human case. Künstliche Intelligenz: KI und Kognition, 18-22.

♦Wiener, J., Tenbrink, T., Henschel, J. and Hölscher, C. (2008). Situated and Prospective Path Planning: Route Choice in an Urban Environment. CogSci 2008: 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, July 23 – 26, Washington, D.C.

♦Wiley, J. (2003). Cognitive and educational implications of visually-rich media: Images and imagination. In M. Hocks and M. Kendrick (Eds.), Eloquent images: Word and Image in the Age of New Media. MIT Press.

♦Wilson, P.N., & Péruch, P. (2002). The influence of interactivity and attention on spatial learing in a desk-top virtual environment. Current Psychology of Cognition, 21, 601-633.

♦Wolbers, T. & Büchel, C. (2005). Dissociable retrosplenial and hippocampal contributions to successful formation of survey representations. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(13), 3333-3340.

♦Wolbers, T., Hegarty, M., Büchel, C. & Loomis, J. (2008). Spatial updating: how the brain keeps track of changing object locations during observer motion. Nature Neuroscience, 11(10), 1223-1230.

♦Wolbers, T., Schoell, E. & Büchel, C. (2006). The predictive value of white matter organization in posterior parietal cortex for spatial visualization ability. NeuroImage, 32(3), 1450-1455.

♦Wolbers, T., Weiller, C. & Büchel, C. (2004). Neural foundations of emerging route knowledge in complex spatial environments. Cognitive Brain Research, 21, 401-411.

♦Wolbers, T., Weiller, C. & Büchel, C. (2003). Contralateral coding of imagined body parts in the superior parietal lobe. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 392-399.

♦Wolbers, T., Wiener, J.M., Mallot, H.A. & Büchel, C. (2007). Differential recruitment of the hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex, and the human motion complex during path integration in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(35), 9408-9416.

♦Wolter, D., Freksa, C. and Latecki, L. J. (2008). Towards a Generalization of Self-Localization. In M. E. Jefferies and W. K. Yeap, (Ed.), Robot and Cognitive Approaches to Spatial Mapping, Series: Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, Vol. 38. Springer Verlag.

♦Wong, C.K., Schmidt, J. and Yeap, W.K. (2007). Using a Mobile Robot for Cognitive Mapping. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 2243-2248.

♦Wood, D. (1992). The power of maps. New York: Guilford Press. ♦Wood, G. & Fischer, M. H. (2008). Numbers, space, and action - from finger counting

to the mental number line and beyond. Cortex, 44, 353-358. ♦Wood, G., Nuerk, H.-C., Willmes, K. & Fischer, M. H. (in press). On the cognitive link

between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC Effect. Psychology Science.

X ♦Xu, Y. & Chun, M. M. (2006). Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-

term memory for objects. Nature, 440, 91-95. ♦Xu, Y. & Nakayama, K. (2007). Visual short-term memory benefit for objects on

different 3D surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 653-662.

Y ♦Yamamoto, N. & Shelton, A. L. (in press). Orientation dependence of spatial memory

acquired from auditory experience. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. ♦Yamamoto, N. & Shelton, A. L. (2007). Path information effects in visual and

proprioceptive spatial learning. Acta Psychologica, 125, 346-360. ♦Yamamoto, N. & Shelton, A. L. (in press). Sequential versus simultaneous viewing of

an environment: Effects of focal attention to individual object locations on visual spatial learning. Visual Cognition.

♦Yamamoto, N. & Shelton, A. L. (2005). Visual and proprioceptive representations in spatial memory. Memory & Cognition, 33, 140-150.

♦Yeap W.K. (2007). From Spatial Perception to Cognitive Maps: How is the flow of information controlled? In H. Schultheis, T. Barkowsky, B. Kuipers and B. Hommel (Eds.), Control Mechanisms for Spatial Knowledge Processing in Cognitive/Intelligent Systems, (pp. 59-61). AAAI Press.

♦Yeap, W.K. and Jefferies, M. (2000). On early cognitive mapping. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2, 85-116.

♦Yeap, W.K. and Jefferies, M. (1999). Computing a representation of the local environment. Artificial Intelligence, 107, 219-263.

Z ♦Zacks, J. M., Mires, J., Tversky, B., & Hazeltine, E. (2002). Mental spatial

transformations of objects and perspective. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2(4), 315-322.

♦ Zacks, J. M., Vettel, J. M., Michelon, P. (2003). Imagined Viewer and Object Rotations Dissociated with Event-Related fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1002-1018.

♦ Zacks, J. M., & Michelon, P. (2005). Transformations of visuospatial images. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 4(2), 96-118.

♦ Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2005). Multiple systems for spatial imagery: Transformations of objects and bodies. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5(4), 271-306.

♦Zimmermann K, Freksa, C, Qualitative spatial reasoning using orientation, distance, and path knowledge. Applied Intelligence 6 (1996) 49-58.

♦Zosh, J. M. & Feigenson, L. (2009). Beyond 'what' and 'how many': Capacity, complexity, and resolution of infants' object representations. In B. Hood & L. Santos (Eds.), The Origins of Object Knowledge (pp. 25-51). New York: Oxford University Press.

♦Zur, O. (2005) Analogical reasoning as a learning mechanism in the domain of number. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, April.