spectral analysis of various thin film modules using high precision

1
® TÜV, TUEV and TUV are registered trademarks. Utilization and application requires prior approval. = b a i SC Photo d SR E A I I λ λ λ ) ( ) ( 80% 90% 100% 110% 120% 1,55 1,57 1,59 1,61 1,63 1,65 1,67 1,69 1,71 1,73 1,75 ∆Isc [%] APE [eV] µ-Si This poster contains results of high-precision indoor and outdoor measurements of different PV module technologies performed at the headquarters of TÜV Rheinland, Cologne, from May 2010 to September 2012. Modules based on CdTe, CI(G)S, a-Si, a-Si/μ-Si, a-Si/a-Si and c-Si (mono and poly) semiconductors were analyzed nondestructively according to their spectral response with a new test equipment and technology specific differences are pointed out. After the indoor characterization the modules were exposed outdoor for one year, steadily measuring the maximum power point P MPP and the I/V- curves with the corresponding solar spectrum. With this extensive data volume it is possible to describe the spectral conditions at the test-site in Cologne using the APE-Method. In a next step the influence on the module performance and the energy yield of the different technologies are analyzed. The photo current is calculated theoretically by the integral of spectral response data and spectral measurements and compared to temperature and irradiance corrected real outdoor measurements. Depending on the position of the sun related to the module and the atmosphere the spectral distribution of solar irradiation can be shifted into blue or red wavelength areas. Some technologies can benefit while others may be disadvantaged depending on their spectral response. In what way and why these spectral shifts happen in the course of a day and the season and what influence they have on the energy yield of a certain technology are described in the following. Markus Schweiger, Ulrike Jahn, Dr. Werner Herrmann TÜV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH, Am Grauen Stein, 51105 Köln, Germany Tel.: +49 221 806-2232, Fax: +49 221 806-1350, E-Mail: [email protected], [email protected] RESULTS This work has been supported by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) within contract No. 0325070A. CONCLUSIONS SPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF VARIOUS THIN FILM MODULES USING HIGH PRECISION SPECTRAL RESPONSE DATA AND SOLAR SPECTRAL IRRADIANCE DATA Figure 1 Non-destructive measurement of the spectral response (SR) of a triple-junction module with a new test equipment at TÜV Rheinland, Cologne Spectral response of different PV module technologies Characterizing solar spectrum with the average photon energy (APE) Influence of spectrum on performance and yield In 2013 TÜV Rheinland will start extensive energy yield measurements at five different locations all over the world. Participation requests can be sent to the authors. Significant differences in SR-Signal of CI(G)S and a-Si specimens APE-Method appropriate method to describe solar spectrum Automatable procedure to correct T, G and MM developed Sinus-shaped performance fluctuation of a-Si because of spectrum Spectrum not significant for energy yield of c-Si and most CI(G)S Annual gains of +3% (some a-Si) and +1% (CdTe) calculated in 11/12 INTRODUCTION 0,00 0,20 0,40 0,60 0,80 1,00 1,20 300 500 700 900 1100 1300 Rel. Spectral Response. Wavelength [nm] Norm AM1.5 a-Si CIS CdTe CIGS poly c-Si mono c-Si CIGS 0,00 0,20 0,40 0,60 0,80 1,00 1,20 300 500 700 900 1100 1300 Rel. Spectral Response Wavelength [nm] CI(G)S 0,00 0,20 0,40 0,60 0,80 1,00 1,20 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Rel. Spectral Response Wavelength [nm] Top-Layer Bottom-Layer The new SR-equipment is suitable for all common module designs (Fig. 1) Step-size 1nm for single-, double- and triple-junction specimens Large spread of the spectral response for different module technologies (Fig. 2) Also large technology internal spreads for a-Si and CI(G)S (Fig. 3 + 4) The spectral mismatch (MM) and the theoretical photo current can be calculated to improve P Max determination and outdoor monitoring 80% 90% 100% 110% 120% ∆Isc [%] CdTe 80% 90% 100% 110% 120% ∆Isc [%] CI(G)S & c-Si 80% 90% 100% 110% 120% ∆Isc [%] a-Si 80% 90% 100% 110% 120% ∆Isc [%] CdTe 80% 90% 100% 110% 120% ∆Isc [%] CI(G)S & c-Si 80% 90% 100% 110% 120% 1,55 1,57 1,59 1,61 1,63 1,65 1,67 1,69 1,71 1,73 1,75 ∆Isc [%] APE [eV] a-Si/µ-Si 80% 90% 100% 110% 120% ∆Isc [%] a-Si Spectrum < 1.65 eV red Spectrum > 1.65 eV blue Spectrum = 1.65 eV STC Winter red spectrum (Fig. 5 + 8) Calculated Measured 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,8 1,9 2 2,1 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 APE [eV] time AM1,5g Summer (21.08.2010) Fall (10.10.2010) Winter (29.01.2011) Spring (19.04.2011) 2 2,2 2,4 2,6 2,8 3 3,2 3,4 3,6 3,8 4 4,2 4,4 4,6 4,8 5 5,2 5,4 Isc [A] Isc: T,G corrected Isc: T,G,MM corrected ) ( ) ( ) ( λ λ λ λ P q I q hc SR QE Φ = = Figure 5 Solar spectral irradiance drift for cloudless days in summer (blue), spring (green), fall (yellow) and winter (red) for modules mounted facing south and 35° tilted in Cologne Figure 9 Correcting spectral effects of an a-Si specimen Figure 8 Seasonal variations of APE-values and average APE-value per month Figure 6 Dependency of ISC on spectral changes, calculated with formula, normalized to ISC,STC at 1.65 eV Figure 7 Dependency of ISC on spectral changes, measured (T, G corrected), normalized to ISC,STC at 1.65 eV Φ = b a i e b a i d q d E APE λ λ λ λ ) ( ' ) ( Figure 2 Rel. spectral response signal of different PV- module technologies in comparison with IEC 60904-3 spectrum Figure 3 + 4 Rel. spectral response signal of different CI(G)S and a-Si modules, illustrating significant differences within the same thin-film technology 1,3 1,35 1,4 1,45 1,5 1,55 1,6 1,65 1,7 1,75 1,8 1,85 1,9 1,95 2 2,05 Jul. 10 Aug. 10 Sep. 10 Okt. 10 Nov. 10 Dez. 10 Jan. 11 Feb. 11 Mrz. 11 Apr. 11 APE [eV] Results of calculated and measured I SC (APE) almost similar (Fig. 6+7) Dependency of a-Si/μ-Si on spectrum screened out as combination of a-Si behavior for APE < 1.65eV and μ-Si behavior for APE > 1.65eV significant losses because of current mismatch expected Almost no dependency of c-Si and most CI(G)S on spectrum Strong dependency of a-Si and small dependency of CdTe on spectrum The seasonal average spectrum was calculated to 1.68 eV in 2011/12. Small gains of max. +3% (some a-Si) and +1% (CdTe) possible.

Upload: vuliem

Post on 14-Jan-2017

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • T

    V,T

    UE

    Van

    dT

    UV

    are

    reg

    iste

    red

    trad

    emar

    ks.

    Util

    iza

    tion

    and

    app

    licat

    ion

    req

    uire

    sp

    rior

    app

    rova

    l.

    =b

    a

    iSCPhoto dSREAII )()(

    80%

    90%

    100%

    110%

    120%

    1,55 1,57 1,59 1,61 1,63 1,65 1,67 1,69 1,71 1,73 1,75

    Is

    c [%

    ]

    APE [eV]

    -Si

    This poster contains results of high-precision indoor and outdoor measurements of different PV module technologies performed at the headquarters of TVRheinland, Cologne, from May 2010 to September 2012. Modules based on CdTe, CI(G)S, a-Si, a-Si/-Si, a-Si/a-Si and c-Si (mono and poly)semiconductors were analyzed nondestructively according to their spectral response with a new test equipment and technology specific differences arepointed out. After the indoor characterization the modules were exposed outdoor for one year, steadily measuring the maximum power point PMPP and the I/V-curves with the corresponding solar spectrum. With this extensive data volume it is possible to describe the spectral conditions at the test-site in Cologneusing the APE-Method. In a next step the influence on the module performance and the energy yield of the different technologies are analyzed. The photocurrent is calculated theoretically by the integral of spectral response data and spectral measurements and compared to temperature and irradiancecorrected real outdoor measurements.

    Depending on the position of the sun related to the module and theatmosphere the spectral distribution of solar irradiation can be shifted intoblue or red wavelength areas. Some technologies can benefit while othersmay be disadvantaged depending on their spectral response. In what wayand why these spectral shifts happen in the course of a day and theseason and what influence they have on the energy yield of a certaintechnology are described in the following.

    Markus Schweiger, Ulrike Jahn, Dr. Werner Herrmann TV Rheinland Energie und Umwelt GmbH, Am Grauen Stein, 51105 Kln, Germany

    Tel.: +49 221 806-2232, Fax: +49 221 806-1350, E-Mail: [email protected], [email protected]

    RESULTS

    This work has been supported by the GermanFederal Ministry for the Environment, NatureConservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU)within contract No. 0325070A.

    CONCLUSIONS

    SPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF VARIOUS THIN FILM MODULES USING HIGH PRECISION SPECTRAL RESPONSE DATA AND

    SOLAR SPECTRAL IRRADIANCE DATA

    Figure 1 Non-destructive measurement of the spectral response (SR) of a triple-junction module with a new test equipmentat TV Rheinland, Cologne

    Spectral response of different PV module technologies

    Characterizing solar spectrum with the average photon energy (APE)

    Influence of spectrum on performance and yield

    In 2013 TV Rheinland will start extensive energy yieldmeasurements at five different locations all over the world.Participation requests can be sent to the authors.

    Significant differences in SR-Signal of CI(G)S and a-Si specimens

    APE-Method appropriate method to describe solar spectrum

    Automatable procedure to correct T, G and MM developed

    Sinus-shaped performance fluctuation of a-Si because of spectrum

    Spectrum not significant for energy yield of c-Si and most CI(G)S

    Annual gains of +3% (some a-Si) and +1% (CdTe) calculated in 11/12

    INTRODUCTION

    0,00

    0,20

    0,40

    0,60

    0,80

    1,00

    1,20

    300 500 700 900 1100 1300

    Rel

    . S

    pec

    tral

    Res

    pon

    se.

    Wavelength [nm]

    Norm AM1.5 a-Si CIS CdTe CIGS poly c-Si mono c-Si CIGS

    0,00

    0,20

    0,40

    0,60

    0,80

    1,00

    1,20

    300 500 700 900 1100 1300

    Rel

    . Spe

    ctra

    l Res

    pons

    e

    Wavelength [nm]

    CI(G)S

    0,00

    0,20

    0,40

    0,60

    0,80

    1,00

    1,20

    300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

    Rel

    . Spe

    ctra

    l Res

    pons

    e

    Wavelength [nm]

    Top-Layer Bottom-Layer

    The new SR-equipment issuitable for all commonmodule designs (Fig. 1)

    Step-size 1nm for single-,double- and triple-junctionspecimens

    Large spread of the spectralresponse for different moduletechnologies (Fig. 2)

    Also large technology internalspreads for a-Si and CI(G)S(Fig. 3 + 4)

    The spectral mismatch (MM)and the theoretical photocurrent can be calculated toimprove PMax determinationand outdoor monitoring

    80%

    90%

    100%

    110%

    120%

    Is

    c [%

    ]

    CdTe

    80%

    90%

    100%

    110%

    120%

    Is

    c [

    %]

    CI(G)S & c-Si

    80%

    90%

    100%

    110%

    120%

    Is

    c [

    %]

    a-Si

    80%

    90%

    100%

    110%

    120%

    Is

    c [

    %]

    CdTe

    80%

    90%

    100%

    110%

    120%

    Is

    c [

    %]

    CI(G)S & c-Si

    80%

    90%

    100%

    110%

    120%

    1,55 1,57 1,59 1,61 1,63 1,65 1,67 1,69 1,71 1,73 1,75

    Is

    c [

    %]

    APE [eV]

    a-Si/-Si

    80%

    90%

    100%

    110%

    120%

    Is

    c [%

    ]

    a-Si

    Spectrum < 1.65 eV red

    Spectrum > 1.65 eV blue

    Spectrum = 1.65 eV STC

    Winter red spectrum (Fig. 5 + 8)

    Calculated Measured

    1,3

    1,4

    1,5

    1,6

    1,7

    1,8

    1,9

    2

    2,1

    6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00

    AP

    E [

    eV

    ]

    time

    AM1,5g Summer (21.08.2010) Fall (10.10.2010) Winter (29.01.2011) Spring (19.04.2011)

    2

    2,2

    2,4

    2,6

    2,8

    3

    3,2

    3,4

    3,6

    3,8

    4

    4,2

    4,4

    4,6

    4,8

    5

    5,2

    5,4

    Isc

    [A]

    Isc: T,G corrected Isc: T,G,MM corrected

    )(

    )()(

    Pq

    I

    q

    hcSRQE

    ==

    Figure 5 Solar spectral irradiance drift for cloudless days insummer (blue), spring (green), fall (yellow) and winter (red)for modules mounted facing south and 35 tilted in Cologne

    Figure 9 Correcting spectral effects of an a-Si specimenFigure 8 Seasonal variations of APE-values and averageAPE-value per month

    Figure 6 Dependency of ISC on spectral changes,calculated with formula, normalized to ISC,STC at 1.65 eV

    Figure 7 Dependency of ISC on spectral changes, measured(T, G corrected), normalized to ISC,STC at 1.65 eV

    =b

    a

    ie

    b

    a

    i

    dq

    dE

    APE

    )('

    )(

    Figure 2 Rel. spectral response signal of different PV-module technologies in comparison with IEC 60904-3spectrum

    Figure 3 + 4 Rel. spectral response signal of differentCI(G)S and a-Si modules, illustrating significant differenceswithin the same thin-film technology

    1,3

    1,35

    1,4

    1,45

    1,5

    1,55

    1,6

    1,65

    1,7

    1,75

    1,8

    1,85

    1,9

    1,95

    2

    2,05

    Jul. 10 Aug. 10 Sep. 10 Okt. 10 Nov. 10 Dez. 10 Jan. 11 Feb. 11 Mrz. 11 Apr. 11

    AP

    E [

    eV

    ]

    Results of calculated and measured ISC (APE) almost similar (Fig. 6+7)

    Dependency of a-Si/-Si on spectrum screened out as combination ofa-Si behavior for APE < 1.65eV and -Si behavior for APE > 1.65eVsignificant losses because of current mismatch expected

    Almost no dependency of c-Si and most CI(G)S on spectrum

    Strong dependency of a-Si and small dependency of CdTe on spectrum

    The seasonal average spectrum was calculated to 1.68 eV in 2011/12. Small gains of max. +3% (some a-Si) and +1% (CdTe) possible.