speed seduction 3 disc five

8/12/2019 Speed Seduction 3 Disc Five

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speed-seduction-3-disc-five 1/23

Speed Seduction 3.0

Program Transcript:

Disc Five

Created By

Ross JeffriesGetting Some”

Website:

http://www.speedseduction.biz

The “Guru of

For the smart guy who refuses

to resort to bullying, begging,

Copyright © 2008, Ross Jeffries. All Rights Reserved.This transcript may not be duplicated without written permission

buying, bs or booze, in his pursuit of happiness.

from the author.

http://www.speedseduction.biz/




Disclaimer

This program may contain viewpoints that may be considered controversial by certainaudiences. It is intended as a powerful guide for self-respecting, intelligent men whoare looking to avoid from "real-hate-shun-ships by default" and instead claim the

happiness that they deserve.

I, Ross Jeffries, Ghita Services., Inc, and/or SpeedSeduction.biz (or any of our otherwebsites or entities) cannot and will not be held responsible in any way for your actions,and will not be held liable for any and all claims from you or any other third party.

You alone are responsible for your decisions and actions, even if they have an impacton others. This information is meant for "entertainment" purposes only.

While this transcript contains information, tips, tools, and strategies that arerecommended by us and, in most cases, have succeeded when applied by others, this

product and its contents carry no warranty or guarantee (either explicit or implied) thatthe purchaser or reader will achieve success with women, or in any other endeavor forwhich they may be used.



Ross: From time to time, we all experience some clarity. The point I’m trying to

make to you is at any moment these four forces are constantly shaping

and reshaping who we are.

The story I told you about that guy whose old self came back is bullshit.

There never was a self to begin with. There were just these different

forces pulling at him in different proportions, in different sequence and in

different degrees of intensity producing his ongoing sense of a self. There

really was no self there. It was just the ongoing flow of these forces

constantly tugging and changing how we define and experience life.

Does that make sense? Here’s what I want you to get. Every human being

goes through it. Every human, old or young, from the moment we’re born

to the moment we draw our last breath, these four forces are constantly

shaping and reshaping who we are.

I’ll tell you something else. The same source that’s constantly tugging at

all of reality reshaping it, in my belief, is that not only is there no self, but

there is no steady, constant reality. My belief is that we are constantly

taken out and put back in, in increments of speed that are too fast for us to

observe and increments of time that are too short for us to perceive. The

perception is that it’s steady and constant.

The perception is we have a self. We wake up. We go through our day

with this constant, steady self that has a series of experiences. I believe

that it’s an illusion. If you can get this sort of idea that we are all constantly

in the same condition, we all came in the same way and will go out the

same way and every moment we are constantly being taken out and put

back into reality by these four forces, you begin to get compassion for

people.

Speed Seduction 3.0 | Program Transcript – Disc Five

Copyright 2008, Ross Jeffries. All Rights Reserved.Website – http://www.speedseduction.biz

1





Here’s what I don’t mean. Look up here. By compassion I don’t mean a

Hallmark greeting card. I don’t mean some syrupy, corny, beautiful, white

light of Jesus is gushing from your heart enveloping everyone in love,

love, love, New Age, tofu-sucking, steak-avoiding, don’t eat meat love. I

don’t mean that.

To me, compassion is a simple perception. It’s a very simple, non-

emotional subtle perception that somewhere in the back of your mind you

hold that we are all sharing the same fundamental condition.

When I walk into any kind of group setting or venue, before I walk in, I take

a breath and imagine every person in that room, male, female, attractive

or unattractive. Their hearts are all beating. I imagine a pair of hands that’s

constantly tugging and pulling them in four different ways. I say to myself,

“Not only are they in the same condition as I am, but the same hands are

constantly shaping the clay of their reality and my reality.” When you look

at people that way, separateness is an illusion.

Here’s the thing you have to get. When it comes to being effective with

people, you have to sort of wear bifocals. You have to be able to look at

people from that perspective, from the compassionate perspective that

says, “Yes. We’re all in the same condition.” Then you also have to be

able to look at yourself as being separate.

The name of the game is not looking at everything as being in union or

everything being separate. The name of the game is freedom and choice.

If somewhere humming in the background of your mind when you’re going

to attract or seduce, you can hold the thought that we’re all in the same

condition, then how can you be afraid of someone who’s being created by

the same thing as you are every moment? How can you feel separate or



2





afraid of someone who’s being produced by the same fundamental forces,

who’s being upheld at every moment by the same thing that’s upholding

you? How can you be afraid or feel separate from someone when you see

them as fundamentally being produced by the same thing as you are?

I challenge you to feel afraid if that’s how you view people. It becomes

impossible. You can’t because you get that fundamentally, we really are

not separate from each other.

I believe there are two ways to look at human beings. Each can be valid

from its own framework. By the way, who knows something at all about

physics? I don’t mean quantum psychology physics that you read in the

back of your weekly throw away newspaper. I mean the real thing. Who

here knows anything about Newton’s Laws of Motion?

You can use Newton’s Laws of Motion to predict the path of an artillery

shell, correct?

Participant: Yes.

Ross: Even though Einstein came along, do Newton’s Laws of Motion work at

speeds approaching the speed of light?

Participant: No.

Ross: No. They don’t. Do they work at subatomic levels to predict quantum

events? Can you predict or describe quantum events using Newton’s

Laws of Motion?

Participant: No.



3





Ross: I can’t hear you.

Participants: No.

Ross: Does that mean that their completely invalid?

Participants: No.

Ross: From a certain frame of reference they work. Even though Einstein came

along, you can still use Newton’s Laws to accurately predict the path of a

bullet, true or false?

Participant: True.

Ross: Depending upon your frame of reference, they’re true or not true. They’re

usable and not usable.

I believe there are two ways to look at human beings. You can look at

humans as basically bags of chemicals. We’re basically chemical,

biological machines moving through a cause-and-effect world. Time flows

in a linear fashion of past, present and future. Yes?

Participant: Yes.

Ross: We’re all separate from each other. That can be a useful perspective.

When you go to do your taxes, you have to view yourself as a separate

thing. You had better view yourself that way. Yes?

God forbid if any of you ever gets into a car accident, cracks up on the M5

motorway, you don’t want them to rush to a Chinese herbalist or an

acupuncturist. I want to be taken to the best Western trauma clinic to have



4





them pump me full of blood, reset my bones and do whatever they need to

do.

However, there’s another view of humans that says fundamentally, you

can view humans as patterns of information. In fact, the future can

influence the past. Time can flow in a lot of different directions. We’re

always connected with each other anyway. Information can travel,

information located without ever actually having to travel. Do you

understand?

You can look at humans in either of those two ways. The language

patterns that I’m giving you are sort of like the cause and effect level. This

energetic stuff I’m giving you is looking at people from a totally different

perspective.

Which on is right? Which one works? They both do according to how you

view people. Does that make sense?

But, here’s the thing. This stuff I’m giving you trumps all the language

patterns. If you can get the vibe down right, learn to walk through

uncertainty without fearing that uncertainty, learn to have equanimity for

the things that trouble other people and stop them, learn to have a good

learning strategy so all that rumination shuts down, by the way, how many

guys here think that beautiful girl ruminates about something in her head?

Raise your hand. I can guarantee you that the super hot woman is

ruminating about something. It could be about some guy she was involved

with five years ago.

When you walk through the world quiet where other people are noisy,

unafraid to step into the unknown and give other people radical permission

to have their first response to you that is so unusually sexy that women



5





can’t even put their finger on the source of their excitement as to why

they’re excited. Do you understand?

No one can ever AIM log you out of that. They can’t. No one can ever

blow you out of the set because your whole world is your set. Do you

understand? It’s undetectable.

I’ll tell you something else. It’s actually more acceptable to women

because when you’re super cocky, smooth and slick, women don’t trust it.

That kind of alpha, sure it may be sexy, but on the other hand it’s a little

scary. “What? Is this guy a professional seducer?” Well, yes, kind of. Do

you understand? It’s frightening.

The kind of stealth charisma I’m teaching you is not frightening. It has

nothing to do with being slick. Does that make sense? Yes, James, my

champion seducer James

James: That’s what I’m actually learning at the moment is to just go with the

attitude let’s go and see. I’ve had the most amazing responses I’ve ever

had from just having that attitude.

Ross: I want you guys to join the “let’s see what happens” club instead of the

“what the fuck just happened” club.

James: It’s the differentiation between approval seeking and I’m actually

comfortable with myself.

Ross: Beautiful. James just said it’s the distinction between seeking approval or

validation and just being comfortable with the process.



6





Here’s the thing I want you guys to get. People entangle. Let’s say this is

your raw lust for a woman. Very few guys experience pure, 100% raw

desire for a woman. They entangle it with a need for validation.

How many people feel they need to be validated by beautiful women?

Raise your hand you fucking liars. Anyone who’s not raising their hand is

either a liar, delusional or they should teach this class.

Participant: They’re gay.

Ross: Or they’re gay. Or they’re a combination of all of these options.

Most guys entangle their raw lust with the need for validation and anxiety.

A lot of guys are carrying a lot of resentment. Am I right or wrong?

Participant: Right.

Ross: I’m willing to bet part of your problem is that you’ve never experienced

pure desire for women. Part of your problem is you’ve never approached a

woman out of pure, raw, unadulterated lust.

Actually, if you really want to know a secret, nothing is more exciting than

pure, raw, unadulterated male lust and desire when it’s not entangled with

all of this stuff. When it’s not entangled with the need for validation,

resentment or ego driven, it’s actually really sexy.

Track 2:

Ross: I want to get into it. This is really a fun little module that I do. It’s effortless

and fun. It’s easy for you guys since it’s toward the end of the day. It’s



7





5:30 p.m. now. I would like to go to 7:00 or even 7:30 p.m. Is that going to

fuck up anybody’s plans?

Participants: No.

Ross: I have a lot to teach. I’ve been re-energized by a nice, vigorous Chinese

massage. I thought we’d change the pace a bit, make it easier for the next

half-hour to forty-five minutes and talk about autopilot responses.

Remember I talked about the third level of the mind where she responds

with the illusion of choice when it’s really just her fixed ways of perceiving.

Many times when we deal with women from the initial approach all the

way to going to bed with them, we get autopilot responses.

I have a belief. All of my verbal responses and behaviors flow out of my

beliefs. If you understand my beliefs and take them on for yourself, then

the verbal responses become easy. You can come up with your own.

I have two core beliefs for dealing with women. I am going to tell you the

beliefs. We’ll discuss them and get the meaning. Then I’ll let you take it

word-for-word but first look up here.

My core beliefs for dealing with women are first, before I even open my

mouth, women will have already given me everything I need, show me

everything I need and tell me everything I need to seduce them.

My second belief that enables me to deal with autopilot is I seldom take a

woman’s first response to me as written in stone. It’s almost always a

reflection of what she’s thinking, feeling and believing in that moment and

context. It’s almost always subject to change. This is a strong belief I hold.



8





The beliefs that flow out of that are anything she offers me is just a toy for

me to play with. Anything she offers me is just information I can use.

Anything she offers me is just energy that I can redirect.

Another belief I have is they can do whatever they want. I control where

my energy flows.

Some of the typical things you’ll hear are, “I have a boyfriend.” Have you

ever heard that?

Participants: Yes.

Ross: I have a full range of responses for that. Are you ready?

“I have a boyfriend.” Here is the first response. “You don’t need to

convince me someone else finds you attractive. That’s not how I make up

my mind.” Write that one down.

What’s the presupposition of that belief? The presupposition of that belief

is telling me she has a boyfriend is not a way of shutting me down. She’s

telling me she has a boyfriend because she wants me to like her more. I’m

deliberately misinterpreting the meaning of her objection and switching the

frame around to say, “Quit trying to convince me that I should like you.” Do

you understand? We’re switching the frame on her.

Her comment, “I have a boyfriend,” is designed to put me off to say, “I’m

not interested.” I’m deliberately misinterpreting it and saying, “Wait a

minute. Stop trying to convince me that I should like because another guy

likes you.” It’s really good.



9





Here’s another response. Check out this one. Watch this, guys. “I have a

boyfriend.” “Anyone even halfway good looking can be with someone. By

that math, you should be with five people, no, four and a half.” What am I

implying there when I say someone?

Participant: Her boyfriend.

Participant: There’s nothing special about it.

Ross: Yes. Someone. She can’t tell if I’m insulting her or what. “By that math,

you should be with five people.” Do you hear the compliment? “Nah, make

it four and a half.”

“Halfway good looking can be with someone.” I didn’t say good looking.

Participant: Have you ever tried, “or maybe six.”?

Ross: No. “By that math, you should be with five people.” That’s saying she’s

really good looking. “Nah, make it four and a half.” Then they always

punch me in the arm and say, “You punk,” or “You’re cheeky.” Do you get

it? I’m just blowing it off with humor and saying it really doesn’t matter.

Here’s another one. Are you ready?

Participant: Whoa.

Ross: Do you want me to repeat it again? Do you still not get it? “Anyone even

halfway good looking could be with someone.”

Participant: I have that.



10





Ross: “By that math you should be with five people. Nah, make it four and a

half.” It’s a clever way of saying, “Come on.” What am I really saying?

“Come on. You can do a lot better than him. I’m not saying it. I’m implying

it. Yes?

Here’s another one. Are you ready?

“I have a boyfriend.” “Boyfriends are like colds. You can catch one at any

time. It doesn’t mean you can’t shake it off.” Do you like that?

Participants: Yes.

Ross: “Will you give me three minutes. I really have to pee.” Take three minutes

and talk amongst yourselves, would you? You’re twitching it into a

metaphor to change how she thinks about it.

“So are you telling me the bridge is out or is it just a little bump in the

road?” You’d be surprised how often you hear, “It’s just a bump in the

road.”

“I have a boyfriend.” “I only know you two minutes and you’re already

telling me your problems.”

What James?

James: Couldn’t you actually use the boyfriend?

Ross: Yes. When a woman says she has a boyfriend, often it’s just a bullshit

autopilot response. A lot of women are what I call “monkey branchers.” Do

you know what a monkey brancher is?



11





Did you ever watch a monkey swing from branch to branch in the zoo? It

doesn’t fully let go of one branch until it has its arm on the other one. It

doesn’t really jump from branch to branch. Some monkeys do but most

monkeys have to grab hold of the next branch before they’ll fully let go of

the other one.

Most women are monkey branchers. The boyfriend is just filling time. It

doesn’t mean anything.

Five years back, I had this fling with this 22-year-old waitress from

California Pizza Kitchen. She’d come over to my house. We’d fuck. Then

she’d say things like, “Can you drive me back to my place. My boyfriend is

taking me to the movies in half an hour.”

She wouldn’t bee seen with me in public. She wouldn’t go to the movies or

dinner with me but she’d come over and fuck. Does that make sense?

Participants: Yes.

Ross: It really doesn’t conventionally make sense but in reality it makes sense.

The other problem with boyfriends is a lot of boyfriends are stuck-up

bitches. They’re not willing to experiment with wild, crazy, sexual shit. Or

the boyfriend may be fulfilling her very nicely when it comes to that social

level of the mind but he’s not really pushing the other buttons. So what?

I used to have a student named Doc Davy. He sort of looked like you but

had 60 more pounds glued to his belly. His specialty was fucking chicks

he picked up in the gym but they would never be seen with him in public.

They wouldn’t go out with him or introduce him to their friends. They would

just fuck him. Poor bastard.



12





The other thing is sometimes I’ve had situations where I’ve met women

and they’ve said, “No. I’m really with someone right now.” I’ll look them in

the eye and say this, “If you should discover he’s not with you in the way

you truly want him to be, maybe we owe it to ourselves to talk.” Listen to

that.

This is an example where I want you to write it down word-for-word, all

right? If they say, “No seriously, I’m really seeing someone,” or “I just

started to date someone. I want to see if it works out,” you say the

following, “If you should discover that he’s not with you in the way you truly

want him to be, maybe we owe it to ourselves to talk.”

Did we get that down word-for-word? This is an instance where I want you

to take notes. You need to get this word-for-word. Did you get it? Who

needs the wording? Make sure you put in that word truly. It’s crucial.

Then give her your number.

Now, let’s parse this out. “If you should discover,” I don’t say how or when

she should discover it or in what manner the discovery should come

through in her mind. This is an example of being what?

Participants: Vague.

Ross: Vague. I didn’t say, “If, as you’re lying there one day after making love to

him, it pops into your mind that he’s a lousy lover and you think about the

kind of fucking you’d really like,” I didn’t say that.

Participants: No.



13





Ross: Why?

Participant: Too specific.

Ross: Too specific. “If you should discover,” discover is very vague. It’ leaves it

broadly wide open. Did I say, “He’s a bastard,” or “He’s a rotten guy,”

“He’s a poor lover,” “He doesn’t listen to you,” or “He’s bad among your

friends.”? Did I say any of those things?

Look up here. It’s crucial that you get this. Knowing when to be specific,

when to be vague and how to fractionate back and forth, is extraordinarily

powerful in persuading people.

Participant: What if you want to say he’s a bastard? Why can’t you?

Ross: Because it may not match her experience. What if she doesn’t think he’s a

bastard? What if the reason she finds he’s not with her in the way she truly

wants him to be is he doesn’t make enough money or he’s a poor lover? I

want her to fill in the gap. Do you understand?

“If you should discover he’s not with you in the way you truly want him to

be,” now, in order to think about that question, what part of her mind does

she have to go into? What does she have to think about?

Participant: Her feelings.

Participant: Her ideals.

Ross: She has to think about the way she truly wants a man to be. There’s a big

distinction here. If I said, “If you discover he’s not with you in the way you

want him to be,” eh. By saying, “truly want him to be,” the implication of



14





that adjective is that there’s another level of satisfaction that she hasn’t

been thinking about. Isn’t there?

“We already have a supplier for our copy machine.” “Well, if you should

discover they’re not meeting you needs in the way you truly want them to,

maybe we owe it to each other to talk.” Do you understand?

“If he’s not with you in the way you truly want him to be,” where does she

have to go in her mind to even contemplate that? She has to go into the

part of her mind where she thinks about the things that would most deeply,

really fulfill her. Yes?

“Maybe,” so it’s a softener, “we owe it to ourselves to talk.” What does that

mean, “owe it to ourselves to talk.”? First of all, saying ourselves implies

that we have a relationship, doesn’t it? I didn’t say, “Maybe you owe it to

yourself to call me.” Why? That would come off as arrogant. Right?

I say, “Maybe we owe it to ourselves to talk.” In what way do we owe it to

ourselves? According to whom do we owe it to ourselves? How should it

occur to her that we owe it to ourselves? What do you mean ourselves

and talk which way? Talk about what? Talk how? Talk where?

It’s so fucking vague. It’s like taking a jellyfish, coating it with grease, and

sliding it down a tube slicked with sex lube. There’s no resistance to push

back against. She can’t push against any of this because I’m not saying

anything specific.

Yet, at the same time, another reason it’s powerful is not just because it’s

vague. It’s powerful because it demonstrates understanding in a woman’s

world. It demonstrates the fact that women are always re-evaluating their

relationships. Even if their happy with a guy, some part of them is always



15





thinking, “Is he really the one? Do I really want to be with him?” They’re

constantly discussing you with their girlfriends.

I’m actually pacing her reality. I’m demonstrating that I understand her

deeper processes because women do that. They’ll be with a guy and

think, “Is he really the one I want to be with?” Women love playing this

game with themselves. It’s part of how they fractionate their interest in a

guy. They love him. They love him. Then they pop out of it and say, “Do I

really love him?” Then they pop back into it. Do you understand? What

usually happens is they say, “I really don’t.”

What am I really doing? This is setting off a time bomb in her mind. It

really is. She’s going to go home and look at him with a much more critical

eye. Now she’s not looking through the eye of he’s my boyfriend. She’s

looking at him through the eye saying, “Is he who I really want to be with?”

Then she’s going to start doubting everything he does. Pretty soon, she’s

going to say, “I need to give that guy a call.” Is that fair?

Participants: Yes.

Ross: This is a ticking, little timed-release capsule. Now, guess what? If he’s a

great guy and doesn’t fuck it up, she may say, “He really is someone I

want to be with.” Chances are he’s an AFC, average frustrated chump, in

some way. He just got lucky and asked her out when she was lonely and

punched the right button a couple of times.

Now, what would most guys do? “Yes, you have a boyfriend but tell me

five reasons why you love him,” “So what? I’m better,” or “Never mind.

Thank you.”

Yes, you had a comment James?



16





James: I was just going to say there’s the likelihood that the relationship’s going to

split up at some point. You’re giving her a safety net.

Ross: You’re enjoying this, aren’t you? You like this one.

The first time I used this, she called me two weeks later and said, “I realize

he really wasn’t with me the way I truly wanted him to be. Can I see you?”

I said, “Sure.”

Participant: Would you give them your number?

Ross: Yes.

Participant: I said that. I got that off your home study work course. I was in a night

club. There was one I said because I read something from your old book

about the sea, the sky and the feel of the sand.

She’s says, “Okay, hypnotize me then.” I said, “All right. Sit on the stool.” I

took her a little bit away from where the music was pumping. Then I used

a little ice cube on her head. She thought, “That was really nice,” but the

first thing she said was if I was magical at hypnosis, I’d be able to bring

her a boyfriend.

After the ice cube, I said, “If you’re not with somebody who’s with you in a

way you truly want them to be, then maybe we should talk.” Then she

looked at me like that and the head went _________. I didn’t have more

firepower or material.

Ross: You didn’t need any more firepower. I dropped the H bomb on her. She

vaporized and I need more firepower. The only firepower you need is to



17





say something like, “You know what? Why don’t we go somewhere a little

more quiet where we can really relax and focus in.”

Participant: That’s like one of those closing statements.

Participant: How do you deal with buyer’s remorse?

Ross: You’re not going to get buyer’s remorse, if every step of the way, she’s

reaching for more.

Participant: It can be a lot longer.

Ross: You won’t get buyer’s remorse if you’re fractionating, challenging her,

feeding back her own language and making her reach for it at every

moment.

Sometimes I’ll say to a woman, “On a scale of one to 10, how does this

feel?” She’ll say, “Ten.” I’ll say, “If and only if you want better feeling, say,

‘more please’.” I’ll make her say more please. Flat out, say, “More please.”

If a woman is reaching for something and she’s actually verbally saying

more, how can she resist it? She’s convincing herself every step of the

way. She’s investing in it, remember?

You won’t get buyer’s remorse. You may get token resistance but that’s

not the same.

Does that make sense?

Participant: Yes.



18





Ross: You see it’s the same principles operating. You’re demonstrating authority

in her world, being vague, and getting her to think from a certain level of

the mind. They’re the same principles no matter what part of the sarge

you’re in.

Participant: Is there any other way of demonstrating authority in her world?

Ross: There are different ways you can demonstrate authority. You can

demonstrate that you understand her ongoing processes by observing

what she’s doing inside energetically. When our friend was up in front of

the room and I noticed what he was thinking as he was thinking it, that

established real expertise of authority in his world. Didn’t it? I was able to

observe.

You can demonstrate that you understand how women think overall. That

statement, “if he’s not with you in the way you truly want him to be,” is not

only vague and requires her to go into the deepest level of her mind to

answer it, but it also demonstrates, without saying it, that you understand

how women think, that women are constantly questioning their

relationships.

The best techniques employ two or three things simultaneously. This one

is really a good example because you’re being vague. She fills in the

blanks and can’t resist. You’re demonstrating authority in her world

because women do in fact question their relationships

You’re requiring a response from the deepest level of her mind. How many

words are in that? Maybe 20 words. It’s pretty powerful. It shows you what

you can do when you know where to direct this communication instead of

willy-nilly tossing things about.



19





Participant: I’ll scan for the eye contact. If I get a bit of eye contact, I’ll drop a smile. If

she goes _________, I’ll hold her there and then. On this scale, you can

see 60 % to 80% of her wanted to side with me. Another part of her is

saying, “Hang on.”

Ross: The sensible part of her.

Participant: You could say that 80% of her wanted to side with me. I was saying,

“Look. I’m a stranger. I’ve stopped you inside the shopping center.” I can

see she was smiling and energetic. She just didn’t have any words. I was

saying, “If you were in a nightclub and I come over and said, “Hello.”

Ross: Can you point your feet like this? Point your feet straight. Look up.

I want you to do something for me. I want you to hold your attention on

your feet. Relax your body and smile. You don’t have to go into trance.

You can look normally into people. Look around the room but put a little bit

of your attention on your feet. Relax your shoulders. You can change. You

don’t have to stand there. Keep 10% of you attention on your feet and talk

to me. Keep talking.

Participant: Like I said, you could say that 80% of her was thinking, “Yes. I like this

fellow. He’s interested.” I said to her, “If I was in a nightclub and I came

and approached you, it would be considered normal. You’re used to

strangers approaching you in a nightclub. Just because I stopped you in a

shopping center, people are shopping and walking by, you don’t know me.

You’re thinking it’s a bit too weird to just come over in Starbucks and just

sit down.”

The reason why I popped the question is if it was you, what would you say

differently to her? You probably have better words than I do.



20






Copyright 2008 Ross Jeffries All Rights Reserved

21

Ross: It’s not my words. Talk to me again but put 20% of your attention in your

feet. Tell me the story again.

Participant: She was walking through the shopping center. I was walking, looked and

saw her eyes. I smiled a little and so did she. I cut across and halted her.

She stopped. I said to her, “I like you. I want to get to know you.” She

smiled a bit and said, “This is a bit random.”

What I did was step out of the way. If she wants to keep walking…

Ross: Stop right there. Don’t say a word. Turn around and look at the camera.

Did any of you see the difference in how he presented?

Participant: Yes.

Ross: What did you notice different when he put 20% of his focus on his feet?

Participant: Slower.

Ross: What else? Less absolutely terrifying because he’s not looking like he’s a

bumblebee on cocaine? Do you need to change tape? You can leave it for

the day.

Your issue, sir, is not what you’re saying. Your issue is you’re like that

junkyard dog with a huge boner ready to hump the world. You’re coming

at people with so much voltage.

speed seduction 3 disc five

Documents