spenser gruenenfelder- portfolio
DESCRIPTION
ÂTRANSCRIPT
SpenSer Gruenenfelder
[email protected]://iSSuu.com/SpenSerGruenenfelder/docS/SpenSer_Gruenenfelder_portfolio_iSS
PRIDE ROCK AT KILIMANJARO SAFARI
Spenser Gruenenfelder COVER SHEET
GRÜENENFELDERL A N D S C A P EARCHITECTURE466 KENNEDY HALLITHACA, NY 14853
TOW
ER R
OAD
REC
ON
STRU
CTIO
NCO
RNEL
L U
NIV
ERSI
TYIT
HAC
A, N
Y
DATE ISSUES & REVISIONS NO.2.7.13 SCHEMATIC DESIGN 12.14.13 DEMOLITION PLAN 22.21.13 LAYOUT PLAN 33.14.13 INTERIM REVIEW 44.4.13 DETAIL REVIEW 54.18.13 LIGHTING PLAN 64.30.13 FINAL REVIEW 7
DRAWN BY: SPENSER GRUENENFELDERLA 3180: SITE CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSOR PETER TROWBRIDGE
DRAWING SCALE: 1" = 20'
SHEET #
L001
SHEET INDEX:
L001- COVER SHEETL101- SURVEYL201- DEMOLITION PLAN/ SITE PREPARATIONL301- LAYOUT PLANL401- GRADING PLANL501- PLANTING PLANL502- PLANTING PLANL601- LIGHTING/FURNISHING PLANL701- DETAILSL702- DETAILSL703- DETAILS
CORNELL UNIVERSITYITHACA, NY
TOWER ROAD RECONSTRUCTION SITECONTACT LIMIT LINE
G E N E R A L N O T E S:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FAMILIAR WITH ALL EXISTING ANDPROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FAMILIAR WITH THE LOCATION OFMECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES, EXISTING OR PROPOSED, INTHE AREAS TO BE PLANTED OR CONSTRUCTED.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IDENTIFYING ALLUTILITIES VIA DIGSAFE (811) PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGE TO ANYUTILITIES OR EQUIPMENT, ABOVE OR UNDERGROUND.
5. IN THE EVENT OF PROPERTY DAMAGE, IT SHALL BE THE SOLERESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RESTORE DAMAGEDPROPERTY TO THE OWNER'S SATISFACTION.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND SHALLREPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE DESIGNER.7. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THEIR WORK AND THAT OF OTHERCONTRACTORS ON SITE.8. NO PLANTING OR CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE TO BE CONFIRMEDWITHOUT APPROVAL OF OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.
PRO
DU
CED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ESK
ED
UC
ATI
ON
AL
PRO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY A
N A
UTO
DESK
EDU
CA
TION
AL PR
OD
UC
T
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
WALKING
Charles BaileyEmily GouldSpenser GruenenfelderMichelle Kim
The Roman Street: An Assessment of Rome’s Walkability
CRP 4160 Cornell in Rome Spring 2012
pride rock at diSney’S animal kinGdom®
PRIDE ROCK AT KILIMANJARO SAFARI
Spenser Gruenenfelder
the idea
the cG model
the planProject Description:The idea was to place Pride Rock from “The Lion King” franchise on Kilimanjaro Safaris at Disney’s Animal Kingdom Park. I accomplished representing this using Autodesk Mudbox (a computer sculpting software), Autodesk Maya, and Photoshop. My model has a more rounded shape than the kopje, granite rock outcropping, depicted in the movie to more accurately represent its real geomorphology (1). I also made a scale model of the project sculpting modeling clay, floral foam, and other elements (3). On the back of the model, I simulated the actual construction style used for the facade which involves placing a wireframe mesh over a scaffolding, coating it in concrete, and painting it (2).
(1)
diSney horticulture profeSSional internShip
Summer 2013
Storyboard
perSpectiveS
the Scale model
1”=20’
(3)
(2)
ithaca Waterfront redevelopment
project deScription:This studio project had three major components. For one, we took walks around ‘Rhineland’ and catalogued our experience through a series of pictures and documenting their exact location. We then were to design a re-imagined waterfont for the City of Ithaca, New York. We developed these design choices into a formalized Form-Based Zoning Code for the waterfront area of the city, nicknamed Rhineland. My major roles were developing the strategy and design for the high density commercial area, serve as liaison between the design group and form-based code group so that their messages matched, as well as form and present the final presentation to the City Officials and community members.
la 3020: inteGratinG theory and practice
SprinG 2013
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00
REMOVE CURB
REMOVE CURB REMOVE CURB
REMOVE EXISTING STAIRS
REMOVE CURB
CAP CATCH BASIN ANDREPLACE AT MANHOLE COVER
REMOVE AND MOVEEXISTING STAIRS
SAWCUT 4' INTO ROAD
11+50 12+0012+50 13+00 13+50
REMOVE CURB
CAP AND MOVE TO NEWCATCH BASIN LOCATION
5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00
REMOVE AND MOVEEXISTING STAIRS
REMOVE CURB REMOVE CURBREMOVE CURB
1"=20'3
1"=20'2
1"=20'1 Tower Road West
Tower Road Center
Tower Road EastSHEET #
L201
DEMOLITION PLANSITE PREPARATION
GRÜENENFELDERL A N D S C A P EARCHITECTURE466 KENNEDY HALLITHACA, NY 14853
TOW
ER R
OAD
REC
ON
STRU
CTIO
NCO
RNEL
L U
NIV
ERSI
TYIT
HAC
A, N
Y
DATE ISSUES & REVISIONS NO.2.7.13 SCHEMATIC DESIGN 12.14.13 DEMOLITION PLAN 22.21.13 LAYOUT PLAN 33.14.13 INTERIM REVIEW 44.4.13 DETAIL REVIEW 54.18.13 LIGHTING PLAN 64.30.13 FINAL REVIEW 7
DRAWN BY: SPENSER GRUENENFELDERLA 3180: SITE CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSOR PETER TROWBRIDGE
DRAWING SCALE: 1" = 20'
DEMOLITION NOTES:-UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, DEMOLISHED MATERIALS BECOME CONTRACTOR'S PROPERTY. REMOVE FROM PROJECTSITE.ITEMS INDICATED TO BE REMOVED AND SALVAGED REMAIN OWNER'S PROPERTY. REMOVE, CLEAN AND DELIVER TOSTAGING AREA.-COMPLY WITH EPA REGULATIONS AND DISPOSAL REGULATIONS OF AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION.-CONDUCT DEMOLITION WITHOUT DISRUPTING VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE OF THE SITE.-MAINTAIN AND PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES TO REMAIN IN SERVICE BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH DEMOLITION-LOCATE, IDENTIFY, SHUT OFF, DISCONNECT AND CAP OFF UTILITY SERVICES TO BE DEMOLISHED AS NEEDED.-CONDUCT DEMOLITION OPERATIONS AND REMOVE DEBRIS TO PREVENT INJURY TO PEOPLE AND DAMAGE TO ADJACENTTREES AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS.-PROTECT ADJACENT STRUCTURES FROM DAMAGE.-PROMPTLY PATCH AND REPAIR HOLES AND DAMAGED SURFACES OF PAVING OR OTHER SURFACES CAUSED BYDEMOLITION. RESTORE EXPOSED FINISHES OF PATCHED AREAS AND EXTEND FINISH RESTORATION INTO REMAININGADJOINING CONSTRUCTION.-PROMPTLY REMOVE DEMOLISHED MATERIALS FROM OWNER'S PROPERTY AND LEGALLY DISPOSE OF THEM.-REDIRECT AND BRING BACK ON LINE ONLY UTILITIES OR SYSTEMS WITH THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF DISRUPTION INSERVICE.
SITE CLEARING NOTES:-PROVIDE IN-GROUND TREE PROTECTION FENCE PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. FENCING SHALL REMAIN IN PLACEUNTIL SITE WORK IS COMPLETED. LOCATION TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.-DO NOT USE HEAVY EQUIPMENT OR CONDUCT ANY ACTIVITY THAT WILL CAUSE COMPACTION UNDER THE DRIP-LINE OFEXISTING TREES.-DO NOT STORE EQUIPMENT OR MATERIALS UNDER THE DRIP-LINE OF EXISTING TREES OR BEHIND PROTECTION FENCE.THE DRIP-LINE RADIUS EQUALS THE LENGTH OF THE LONGEST LIMB, PERPENDICULAR TO THE TRUNK.-WHEN ROOTS OF OVER 1" IN DIAMETER OR GREATER ARE EXPOSED, NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO REMOVAL.-REMOVE VEGETATION, IMPROVEMENTS OR OBSTRUCTIONS AS REQUIRED AND AS INDICATED TO PERMIT INSTALLATIONOF NEW CONSTRUCTION. REMOVAL INCLUDES DIGGING OUT AND OFF-SITE DISPOSAL OF STUMPS AND ROOTS. USE ONLYHAND METHODS FOR GRUBBING INSIDE DRIP-LINE OF TREES INDICATED TO REMAIN.-STRIP TOPSOIL TO WHATEVER DEPTHS ENCOUNTERED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT INTERMINGLING WITH UNDERLYINGSUBSOIL OR OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL. REMOVE HEAVY GROWTHS OF GRASS OR OTHER PLANTS BEFORESTRIPPING.-WHERE EXISTING TREES ARE INDICATED TO REMAIN, LEAVE EXISTING TOPSOIL IN PLACE WITHIN DRIP-LINES TOPREVENT DAMAGE TO ROOT SYSTEM.
-STOCKPILE TOPSOIL IN STORAGE PILES IN STAGING AREA.-CONSTRUCT STORAGE PILES TO PROVIDE FREE DRAINAGE OF SURFACE WATER. COVER STORAGE PILES, IF REQUIRED, TOPREVENT WIND EROSION
KEY
STORM
PAVEMENT REMOVAL
GRAVEL REMOVAL
SOIL REMOVAL (42" COMPACTED SOIL)
TREE/LIGHT REMOVAL
CURB REMOVAL
CONSTRUCTION FENCELINE
SILT FENCELINE
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
CONTRACT LIMIT LINE
CATCH BASIN
MANHOLE
LIGHT POLE
EXISTING TREE
REMOVE TEMPORARY GRAVEL PARKING AREAREMOVE SOIL FOR AREAS THAT WILL HOLD BIOSWALE
1701
SAWCUT ANDREMOVE ASPHALT
2701
1701
CATCH BASIN PROTECTION
2701
PRO
DU
CED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ESK
ED
UC
ATI
ON
AL
PRO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY A
N A
UTO
DESK
EDU
CA
TION
AL PR
OD
UC
T
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
COVER SHEET
GRÜENENFELDERL A N D S C A P EARCHITECTURE466 KENNEDY HALLITHACA, NY 14853
TOW
ER R
OAD
REC
ON
STRU
CTIO
NCO
RNEL
L U
NIV
ERSI
TYIT
HAC
A, N
Y
DATE ISSUES & REVISIONS NO.2.7.13 SCHEMATIC DESIGN 12.14.13 DEMOLITION PLAN 22.21.13 LAYOUT PLAN 33.14.13 INTERIM REVIEW 44.4.13 DETAIL REVIEW 54.18.13 LIGHTING PLAN 64.30.13 FINAL REVIEW 7
DRAWN BY: SPENSER GRUENENFELDERLA 3180: SITE CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSOR PETER TROWBRIDGE
DRAWING SCALE: 1" = 20'
SHEET #
L001
SHEET INDEX:
L001- COVER SHEETL101- SURVEYL201- DEMOLITION PLAN/ SITE PREPARATIONL301- LAYOUT PLANL401- GRADING PLANL501- PLANTING PLANL502- PLANTING PLANL601- LIGHTING/FURNISHING PLANL701- DETAILSL702- DETAILSL703- DETAILS
CORNELL UNIVERSITYITHACA, NY
TOWER ROAD RECONSTRUCTION SITECONTACT LIMIT LINE
G E N E R A L N O T E S:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FAMILIAR WITH ALL EXISTING ANDPROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FAMILIAR WITH THE LOCATION OFMECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES, EXISTING OR PROPOSED, INTHE AREAS TO BE PLANTED OR CONSTRUCTED.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IDENTIFYING ALLUTILITIES VIA DIGSAFE (811) PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGE TO ANYUTILITIES OR EQUIPMENT, ABOVE OR UNDERGROUND.
5. IN THE EVENT OF PROPERTY DAMAGE, IT SHALL BE THE SOLERESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RESTORE DAMAGEDPROPERTY TO THE OWNER'S SATISFACTION.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND SHALLREPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE DESIGNER.7. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THEIR WORK AND THAT OF OTHERCONTRACTORS ON SITE.8. NO PLANTING OR CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE TO BE CONFIRMEDWITHOUT APPROVAL OF OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.
PRO
DU
CED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ESK
ED
UC
ATI
ON
AL
PRO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY A
N A
UTO
DESK
EDU
CA
TION
AL PR
OD
UC
T
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
18"
8"
72" MAXIMUM
GEOTEXTILE
WOODEN STAKE 36' MINIMUM STAKE LENGTHSILT FILM18" MIN.
FLOW
UNDISTURBED GROUND
10"
EMBED GEOTEXTILE A MINIMUM OF 8"IN THE GROUND VERTICALLY,BACKFILL AND COMPACT SOIL
12"
CHAIN_LINK_FENCE_SECTION
96"
72"
NOTE: FULL EXTENT OFFENCELINE SHOULD BECOVERED BY A DRY TOP GREENTARP
18"
STANDING BASE TO BEPLACED AT EACH POSTON A LEVEL SURFACE
CHAIN_LINK_FENCE_SECTION
112"
3"
1' 0"
NYSDOT TYPE 7 TOP COURSE
NYSDOT TYPE 3 BINDER COURSESEPARATION FABRIC
COMPACTEDSUBGRADE
NO. 2 STONE
8"
4"
WAUSUA PRESSED CONCRETEPLANKPAVERS; 6" X 36"
ASPHALT MASTIC
TYPE 1 NYSDOT ASPHALT BASE
NO. 2 CRUSHED STONE
COMPACTED SUB-BASE
7"
8"
2" MINIMUM
18"MINIMUM
ON COMPACTEDEARTH SUB-BASE
TACK COAT
8"
4"
4000 PSI CONCRETE, 6X6 WWM, ON CHAIRS
No 2 STONE GRANULAR BASE
COMPACTED SUB-BASE
6' X 6'4000PSICONCRETEPAVERS
72"
72"
12"
12" EXPANSION JOINT72"
36"
6' X 3'4000PSICONCRETEPAVERS
12" WIDTH
JOINT SEALANTPREVENT BOND USED FORTHIN, LIGHTLY LOADEDSLABS- UP TO 4" THICKNESS
DETAILS
GRÜENENFELDERL A N D S C A P EARCHITECTURE466 KENNEDY HALLITHACA, NY 14853
TOW
ER R
OAD
REC
ON
STRU
CTIO
NCO
RNEL
L U
NIV
ERSI
TYIT
HAC
A, N
Y
DATE ISSUES & REVISIONS NO.2.7.13 SCHEMATIC DESIGN 12.14.13 DEMOLITION PLAN 22.21.13 LAYOUT PLAN 33.14.13 INTERIM REVIEW 44.4.13 DETAIL REVIEW 54.18.13 LIGHTING PLAN 64.30.13 FINAL REVIEW 7
DRAWN BY: SPENSER GRUENENFELDERLA 3180: SITE CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSOR PETER TROWBRIDGE
DRAWING SCALE: VARIES
SHEET #
L701
SCALE_1"=1'
SILT_FENCE_SECTION1A 1B SILT_FENCE_ELEVATIONSCALE_1"=1' 2A CONSTRUCTION_FENCE_SECTION
SCALE_1/2"=1' 2B CONST_FENCE_ELEVSCALE_1/2"=1'
3 ASPHALT_PAVEMENTSCALE_2"=1' 4 PLANKPAVERS_ON_ASPHALT_BASE
SCALE_1"=1'
6 MEDIUM_DUTY_CONRETESCALE_1/4"=1'
SCALE_1/4"=1'
GRANITE_CURB5
NOTES:1. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALLBE AT A MAXIMUM SPACINGOF 24 FEET2. THE EXPANSION JOINTS OFTHE CURB FACING SHALL LINEUP WITH THE EXPANSIONJOINTS OF THE CONCRETESIDEWALKS, WHEREVERPOSSIBLE3. SURFACE TO BE CLEANEDAND PAINTED AS PER NYSDOTSTANDARD HIGHWAYSPECIFICATIONS
FROM HWY STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAILS, NYSDOT
7A SIDEWALK_PLANSCALE_1/2"=1' 7B CONCRETE_EXPANSION_JOINT
SCALE_3"=1'
PRO
DU
CED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ESK
ED
UC
ATI
ON
AL
PRO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY A
N A
UTO
DESK
EDU
CA
TION
AL PR
OD
UC
T
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
toWer road reconStruction
project deScription:Provided a set of Construction Documents for the Tower Road Reconstruction on Cornell University’s campus. The documents include surveying, demolition plan, grading plan, planting plan, lighting and site furnishing plan, site layout, and all relevant detail drawings. The project addresses stormwater capture and infiltration into the soil, erosion from construction debris, provide new pedestrian walks and better connectivity, better bicycle access, new bus stops, and improved planting, lighting, and street furnishings. The project is compliant with all local and state laws and construction and accessibility standards.
6"
66"
12" 12"72"
96"
24"
PITCH 10% MAX
DETECTABLE WARNING2' X 2' GRANITE TILES2% MAX SLOPE
GRANITE CURB
UNIT PAVERS
GRANITE CURB
NOTES:1. UNIT PAVERS FOR RAISED CROSSWALK:WAUSAU MUNICH I PAVERS; COLOR: BROWN-BLACK2. UNIT PAVERS TO BE LAID IN PINWHEEL PATTERN AS SHOWN
6" 9' 3"
ASPHALT SHIM
3" WAUSAU MUNICH I PAVERS
1" SAND SETTING BED
4000 PSI CONCRETE NO. 4 REBAR 12 O.C. BOTH WAYS
1" RADIUS WEEPS 3' O.C.
FILTERFABRIC
12-16" NO.2 STONECOMPACTSUBGRADETO 95%
MEDIUM DUTYCONCRETESIDEWALK
12" EXPANSION JOINT
AND SEALANT BETWEENCONCRETE AND GRANITE CURB
1% SLOPE
NOTES:1. MAX 3%-5% SLOPE2. UNIT PAVERS FOR RAISED CROSSWALK:WAUSAU MUNICH I PAVER, PINWHEEL PATTERNCOLOR: BROWN-BLACK3. SHIM ASPHALT SHALL BE TYPE 7 NYSDOT
NEW ASPHALT SHIM
EXISTING ASPHALT W/ 2" MILLED AWAY
UNIT PAVERS W/ SAND SWEPT JOINTS
1" SAND SETTING BED OVER GEOTECH
6" STEEL-REINFORCED 4000 PSI CONCRETE,#4 REBAR 12" O.C. BOTH WAYS1" RADIUS VERT. WEEPS, 3" O.C.
18" NO. 2 STONE
COMPACTED SUBBASE
16" GRANITE CURB, TOP FLUSH WITH SHIM ANDPAVERS
1% SLOPE
CONCRETE SLURRY BED
TACK COAT
7"5"
5"3' MINIMUM
4" THICK MULCH LAYER
PLANTING SOIL MIXCU STRUCTURAL SOIL
9' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALKBASE COURSE
BIOSWALE SOILCONCRETE CURB
TOWER ROAD ASPHALT
TOP OF BANK
SUB-BASE
PLANTING SOIL MIX
SUB-BASE
4" THICK BARK MULCH
3' MINIMUM
DETAILS
GRÜENENFELDERL A N D S C A P EARCHITECTURE466 KENNEDY HALLITHACA, NY 14853
TOW
ER R
OAD
REC
ON
STRU
CTIO
NCO
RNEL
L U
NIV
ERSI
TYIT
HAC
A, N
Y
DATE ISSUES & REVISIONS NO.2.7.13 SCHEMATIC DESIGN 12.14.13 DEMOLITION PLAN 22.21.13 LAYOUT PLAN 33.14.13 INTERIM REVIEW 44.4.13 DETAIL REVIEW 54.18.13 LIGHTING PLAN 64.30.13 FINAL REVIEW 7
DRAWN BY: SPENSER GRUENENFELDERLA 3180: SITE CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSOR PETER TROWBRIDGE
DRAWING SCALE: VARIES
SHEET #
L702
9C RAISED_CROSSWALK_TO_SIDEWALKSCALE_1"=1'
9D RAISED_CROSSWALK_SECTIONSCALE_3/4"=1'
9B RAISED_CROSSWALK_MATERIALSSCALE_1"=1'
9A RAISED_CROSSWALK_PLANSCALE_1/4"=1'
8 DROP_KERB_PLANSCALE_3/4"=1'
SCALE_1/4"=1'
BIOSWALE_AND_TREE_PLANTING_SECTION10 SCALE_1/4"=1'
TREE_PLANTING11
ROOT BALL SET 3' IN HOLEHOLE WIDTH SHOULD BE 3
TIMES DEPTH OF BALL
PRO
DU
CED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ESK
ED
UC
ATI
ON
AL
PRO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY A
N A
UTO
DESK
EDU
CA
TION
AL PR
OD
UC
T
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
la 3180: Site conStruction
SprinG 2013
6"
66"
12" 12"72"
96"
24"
PITCH 10% MAX
DETECTABLE WARNING2' X 2' GRANITE TILES2% MAX SLOPE
GRANITE CURB
UNIT PAVERS
GRANITE CURB
NOTES:1. UNIT PAVERS FOR RAISED CROSSWALK:WAUSAU MUNICH I PAVERS; COLOR: BROWN-BLACK2. UNIT PAVERS TO BE LAID IN PINWHEEL PATTERN AS SHOWN
6" 9' 3"
ASPHALT SHIM
3" WAUSAU MUNICH I PAVERS
1" SAND SETTING BED
4000 PSI CONCRETE NO. 4 REBAR 12 O.C. BOTH WAYS
1" RADIUS WEEPS 3' O.C.
FILTERFABRIC
12-16" NO.2 STONECOMPACTSUBGRADETO 95%
MEDIUM DUTYCONCRETESIDEWALK
12" EXPANSION JOINT
AND SEALANT BETWEENCONCRETE AND GRANITE CURB
1% SLOPE
NOTES:1. MAX 3%-5% SLOPE2. UNIT PAVERS FOR RAISED CROSSWALK:WAUSAU MUNICH I PAVER, PINWHEEL PATTERNCOLOR: BROWN-BLACK3. SHIM ASPHALT SHALL BE TYPE 7 NYSDOT
NEW ASPHALT SHIM
EXISTING ASPHALT W/ 2" MILLED AWAY
UNIT PAVERS W/ SAND SWEPT JOINTS
1" SAND SETTING BED OVER GEOTECH
6" STEEL-REINFORCED 4000 PSI CONCRETE,#4 REBAR 12" O.C. BOTH WAYS1" RADIUS VERT. WEEPS, 3" O.C.
18" NO. 2 STONE
COMPACTED SUBBASE
16" GRANITE CURB, TOP FLUSH WITH SHIM ANDPAVERS
1% SLOPE
CONCRETE SLURRY BED
TACK COAT
7"5"
5"3' MINIMUM
4" THICK MULCH LAYER
PLANTING SOIL MIXCU STRUCTURAL SOIL
9' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALKBASE COURSE
BIOSWALE SOILCONCRETE CURB
TOWER ROAD ASPHALT
TOP OF BANK
SUB-BASE
PLANTING SOIL MIX
SUB-BASE
4" THICK BARK MULCH
3' MINIMUM
DETAILS
GRÜENENFELDERL A N D S C A P EARCHITECTURE466 KENNEDY HALLITHACA, NY 14853
TOW
ER R
OAD
REC
ON
STRU
CTIO
NCO
RNEL
L U
NIV
ERSI
TYIT
HAC
A, N
Y
DATE ISSUES & REVISIONS NO.2.7.13 SCHEMATIC DESIGN 12.14.13 DEMOLITION PLAN 22.21.13 LAYOUT PLAN 33.14.13 INTERIM REVIEW 44.4.13 DETAIL REVIEW 54.18.13 LIGHTING PLAN 64.30.13 FINAL REVIEW 7
DRAWN BY: SPENSER GRUENENFELDERLA 3180: SITE CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSOR PETER TROWBRIDGE
DRAWING SCALE: VARIES
SHEET #
L702
9C RAISED_CROSSWALK_TO_SIDEWALKSCALE_1"=1'
9D RAISED_CROSSWALK_SECTIONSCALE_3/4"=1'
9B RAISED_CROSSWALK_MATERIALSSCALE_1"=1'
9A RAISED_CROSSWALK_PLANSCALE_1/4"=1'
8 DROP_KERB_PLANSCALE_3/4"=1'
SCALE_1/4"=1'
BIOSWALE_AND_TREE_PLANTING_SECTION10 SCALE_1/4"=1'
TREE_PLANTING11
ROOT BALL SET 3' IN HOLEHOLE WIDTH SHOULD BE 3
TIMES DEPTH OF BALL
PRO
DU
CED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ESK
ED
UC
ATI
ON
AL
PRO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY A
N A
UTO
DESK
EDU
CA
TION
AL PR
OD
UC
T
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
6"
66"
12" 12"72"
96"
24"
PITCH 10% MAX
DETECTABLE WARNING2' X 2' GRANITE TILES2% MAX SLOPE
GRANITE CURB
UNIT PAVERS
GRANITE CURB
NOTES:1. UNIT PAVERS FOR RAISED CROSSWALK:WAUSAU MUNICH I PAVERS; COLOR: BROWN-BLACK2. UNIT PAVERS TO BE LAID IN PINWHEEL PATTERN AS SHOWN
6" 9' 3"
ASPHALT SHIM
3" WAUSAU MUNICH I PAVERS
1" SAND SETTING BED
4000 PSI CONCRETE NO. 4 REBAR 12 O.C. BOTH WAYS
1" RADIUS WEEPS 3' O.C.
FILTERFABRIC
12-16" NO.2 STONECOMPACTSUBGRADETO 95%
MEDIUM DUTYCONCRETESIDEWALK
12" EXPANSION JOINT
AND SEALANT BETWEENCONCRETE AND GRANITE CURB
1% SLOPE
NOTES:1. MAX 3%-5% SLOPE2. UNIT PAVERS FOR RAISED CROSSWALK:WAUSAU MUNICH I PAVER, PINWHEEL PATTERNCOLOR: BROWN-BLACK3. SHIM ASPHALT SHALL BE TYPE 7 NYSDOT
NEW ASPHALT SHIM
EXISTING ASPHALT W/ 2" MILLED AWAY
UNIT PAVERS W/ SAND SWEPT JOINTS
1" SAND SETTING BED OVER GEOTECH
6" STEEL-REINFORCED 4000 PSI CONCRETE,#4 REBAR 12" O.C. BOTH WAYS1" RADIUS VERT. WEEPS, 3" O.C.
18" NO. 2 STONE
COMPACTED SUBBASE
16" GRANITE CURB, TOP FLUSH WITH SHIM ANDPAVERS
1% SLOPE
CONCRETE SLURRY BED
TACK COAT
7"5"
5"3' MINIMUM
4" THICK MULCH LAYER
PLANTING SOIL MIXCU STRUCTURAL SOIL
9' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALKBASE COURSE
BIOSWALE SOILCONCRETE CURB
TOWER ROAD ASPHALT
TOP OF BANK
SUB-BASE
PLANTING SOIL MIX
SUB-BASE
4" THICK BARK MULCH
3' MINIMUM
DETAILS
GRÜENENFELDERL A N D S C A P EARCHITECTURE466 KENNEDY HALLITHACA, NY 14853
TOW
ER R
OAD
REC
ON
STRU
CTIO
NCO
RNEL
L U
NIV
ERSI
TYIT
HAC
A, N
Y
DATE ISSUES & REVISIONS NO.2.7.13 SCHEMATIC DESIGN 12.14.13 DEMOLITION PLAN 22.21.13 LAYOUT PLAN 33.14.13 INTERIM REVIEW 44.4.13 DETAIL REVIEW 54.18.13 LIGHTING PLAN 64.30.13 FINAL REVIEW 7
DRAWN BY: SPENSER GRUENENFELDERLA 3180: SITE CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSOR PETER TROWBRIDGE
DRAWING SCALE: VARIES
SHEET #
L702
9C RAISED_CROSSWALK_TO_SIDEWALKSCALE_1"=1'
9D RAISED_CROSSWALK_SECTIONSCALE_3/4"=1'
9B RAISED_CROSSWALK_MATERIALSSCALE_1"=1'
9A RAISED_CROSSWALK_PLANSCALE_1/4"=1'
8 DROP_KERB_PLANSCALE_3/4"=1'
SCALE_1/4"=1'
BIOSWALE_AND_TREE_PLANTING_SECTION10 SCALE_1/4"=1'
TREE_PLANTING11
ROOT BALL SET 3' IN HOLEHOLE WIDTH SHOULD BE 3
TIMES DEPTH OF BALL
PRO
DU
CED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ESK
ED
UC
ATI
ON
AL
PRO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY A
N A
UTO
DESK
EDU
CA
TION
AL PR
OD
UC
T
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
0+00 2+001+500+50 1+00 4+50 5+00
12+00 12+50 13+0011+00 11+50
6+00 6+50 9+00 9+50 10+505+50 7+507+00 8+508+00 10+00 11+00
Tower Road West
Tower Road Center
Tower Road East
1 1"=20'
2 1"=20'
3 1"=20'
PLANTING PLAN
GRÜENENFELDERL A N D S C A P EARCHITECTURE466 KENNEDY HALLITHACA, NY 14853
TOW
ER R
OAD
REC
ON
STRU
CTIO
NCO
RNEL
L U
NIV
ERSI
TYIT
HAC
A, N
Y
DATE ISSUES & REVISIONS NO.2.7.13 SCHEMATIC DESIGN 12.14.13 DEMOLITION PLAN 22.21.13 LAYOUT PLAN 33.14.13 INTERIM REVIEW 44.4.13 DETAIL REVIEW 54.18.13 LIGHTING PLAN 64.30.13 FINAL REVIEW 7
DRAWN BY: SPENSER GRUENENFELDERLA 3180: SITE CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSOR PETER TROWBRIDGE
DRAWING SCALE: 1" = 20'
SHEET #
L502
ILve'WR'2
ILve'WR'2
ILve'WR'2
ILve'WR'2
ILve'WR'2
ILve'WR'2
ILve'WR'2
ILve'WR'2
ILve'WR'2
ILve'WR'3
ILve'WR'3
ILve'WR'2
ILve'WR'2ILve'WR'
2
ILve'WR'4
ILve'WR'3
PAvi'CN'3
PAvi'CN'7PAvi'CN'
8PAvi'CN'
7
PAvi'CN'7
PAvi'CN'6 PAvi'CN'
3
PAvi'CN'6
PAvi'CN'8
SPpe'A'3 SPpe'A'
3SPpe'A'
3SPpe'A'
3SPpe'A'
3
SPpe'A'3
SPpe'A'3
SPpe'A'3
SPpe'A'3
SPpe'A'3
SPpe'A'3
SPpe'A'3
SPpe'A'3
PAvi'HM'8
PAvi'R'3
CHgl3
HEau4
PAvi'HM'8
PAvi'R'3
CHgl3
HEau4
PAvi'HM'8
PAvi'R'3
CHgl3
HEau4
PAvi'HM'8
PAvi'R'3
CHgl3
HEau4
PAvi'HM'8
PAvi'R'3
CHgl3
HEau4
PAvi'HM'8
PAvi'R'3
CHgl3
HEau4
PAvi'HM'8
PAvi'R'3
CHgl3
HEau4
PAvi'HM'8
PAvi'R'3
CHgl3
HEau4
PAvi'HM'8
PAvi'R'3
CHgl3
HEau4
PAvi'HM'8
PAvi'R'3
CHgl3
HEau4
PAvi'HM'8
PAvi'R'3
CHgl3
HEau4
PAvi'HM'8
PAvi'R'3
CHgl3
HEau4
PAvi'HM'8
PAvi'R'3
CHgl3
HEau4
PAvi'HM'17
PAvi'R'3
CHgl3
HEau4
PAvi'R'3
CHgl3
HEau4
EUpu'G'3
EUpu'G'2
EUpu'G'3
EUpu'G'2
EUpu'G'2
EUpu'G'2
EUpu'G'6
EUpu'G'1
EUpu'G'2
EUpu'G'2
EUpu'G'6
EUpu'G'6
CAca2
CAca2
CAca5
CAca2
CAca2
CAca5
CAca2
CAca3
PLANTING NOTES:
-PLANTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY PERSONS FAMILIAR WITH THIS TYPE OF WORK ANDUNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A QUALIFIED FOREMAN.-THE PLANT COUNT IS FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR.-IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY, THE PLAN WILL GOVERN.-LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO SCREEN METERS, UTILITYSTRUCTURES, ETC., YET TO ALLOW ACCESS AS REQUIRED.-TOPSOIL TO BE 'PREMIUM TOP SOIL' BY AGWAY.-'PREMIUM TOP SOIL' BACKFILL MIX FOR SHRUBS AND TREES TO BE 50% TOPSOIL, 50%NATIVE SOIL. BACKFILL MIX AT PLANTS WITH ACID REQUIREMENTS TO BE 50% IMPORTEDTOPSOIL, 50% SPHAGNUM PEAT MOSS.-EXCESSIVELY CLAY SOILS ARE TO BE REMOVED FROM SITE.-LAWN AREA: PLACE 8" OF CLEAN RIVER SAND. SPREAD 4" OF TOPSOIL CULTIVATE 6" SANDREMOVING ALL ROCKS TO 2" DIA.-PULL BY THE ROOTS ALL EXISTING WEEDS AND REMOVE FROM SITE.-HYDROSEED DISTURBED AREAS NOT PLANTED IN SHRUBS OR GROUND COVERS.-THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE PLANTED STOCK FOR A 60-DAY MAINTENANCE PERIODAFTER FINAL ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER.
PRO
DU
CED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ESK
ED
UC
ATI
ON
AL
PRO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY A
N A
UTO
DESK
EDU
CA
TION
AL PR
OD
UC
T
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
6"
66"
12" 12"72"
96"
24"
PITCH 10% MAX
DETECTABLE WARNING2' X 2' GRANITE TILES2% MAX SLOPE
GRANITE CURB
UNIT PAVERS
GRANITE CURB
NOTES:1. UNIT PAVERS FOR RAISED CROSSWALK:WAUSAU MUNICH I PAVERS; COLOR: BROWN-BLACK2. UNIT PAVERS TO BE LAID IN PINWHEEL PATTERN AS SHOWN
6" 9' 3"
ASPHALT SHIM
3" WAUSAU MUNICH I PAVERS
1" SAND SETTING BED
4000 PSI CONCRETE NO. 4 REBAR 12 O.C. BOTH WAYS
1" RADIUS WEEPS 3' O.C.
FILTERFABRIC
12-16" NO.2 STONECOMPACTSUBGRADETO 95%
MEDIUM DUTYCONCRETESIDEWALK
12" EXPANSION JOINT
AND SEALANT BETWEENCONCRETE AND GRANITE CURB
1% SLOPE
NOTES:1. MAX 3%-5% SLOPE2. UNIT PAVERS FOR RAISED CROSSWALK:WAUSAU MUNICH I PAVER, PINWHEEL PATTERNCOLOR: BROWN-BLACK3. SHIM ASPHALT SHALL BE TYPE 7 NYSDOT
NEW ASPHALT SHIM
EXISTING ASPHALT W/ 2" MILLED AWAY
UNIT PAVERS W/ SAND SWEPT JOINTS
1" SAND SETTING BED OVER GEOTECH
6" STEEL-REINFORCED 4000 PSI CONCRETE,#4 REBAR 12" O.C. BOTH WAYS1" RADIUS VERT. WEEPS, 3" O.C.
18" NO. 2 STONE
COMPACTED SUBBASE
16" GRANITE CURB, TOP FLUSH WITH SHIM ANDPAVERS
1% SLOPE
CONCRETE SLURRY BED
TACK COAT
7"5"
5"3' MINIMUM
4" THICK MULCH LAYER
PLANTING SOIL MIXCU STRUCTURAL SOIL
9' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALKBASE COURSE
BIOSWALE SOILCONCRETE CURB
TOWER ROAD ASPHALT
TOP OF BANK
SUB-BASE
PLANTING SOIL MIX
SUB-BASE
4" THICK BARK MULCH
3' MINIMUM
DETAILS
GRÜENENFELDERL A N D S C A P EARCHITECTURE466 KENNEDY HALLITHACA, NY 14853
TOW
ER R
OAD
REC
ON
STRU
CTIO
NCO
RNEL
L U
NIV
ERSI
TYIT
HAC
A, N
Y
DATE ISSUES & REVISIONS NO.2.7.13 SCHEMATIC DESIGN 12.14.13 DEMOLITION PLAN 22.21.13 LAYOUT PLAN 33.14.13 INTERIM REVIEW 44.4.13 DETAIL REVIEW 54.18.13 LIGHTING PLAN 64.30.13 FINAL REVIEW 7
DRAWN BY: SPENSER GRUENENFELDERLA 3180: SITE CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSOR PETER TROWBRIDGE
DRAWING SCALE: VARIES
SHEET #
L702
9C RAISED_CROSSWALK_TO_SIDEWALKSCALE_1"=1'
9D RAISED_CROSSWALK_SECTIONSCALE_3/4"=1'
9B RAISED_CROSSWALK_MATERIALSSCALE_1"=1'
9A RAISED_CROSSWALK_PLANSCALE_1/4"=1'
8 DROP_KERB_PLANSCALE_3/4"=1'
SCALE_1/4"=1'
BIOSWALE_AND_TREE_PLANTING_SECTION10 SCALE_1/4"=1'
TREE_PLANTING11
ROOT BALL SET 3' IN HOLEHOLE WIDTH SHOULD BE 3
TIMES DEPTH OF BALL
PRO
DU
CED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ESK
ED
UC
ATI
ON
AL
PRO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY A
N A
UTO
DESK
EDU
CA
TION
AL PR
OD
UC
T
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
18"
8"
72" MAXIMUM
GEOTEXTILE
WOODEN STAKE 36' MINIMUM STAKE LENGTHSILT FILM18" MIN.
FLOW
UNDISTURBED GROUND
10"
EMBED GEOTEXTILE A MINIMUM OF 8"IN THE GROUND VERTICALLY,BACKFILL AND COMPACT SOIL
12"
CHAIN_LINK_FENCE_SECTION
96"
72"
NOTE: FULL EXTENT OFFENCELINE SHOULD BECOVERED BY A DRY TOP GREENTARP
18"
STANDING BASE TO BEPLACED AT EACH POSTON A LEVEL SURFACE
CHAIN_LINK_FENCE_SECTION
112"
3"
1' 0"
NYSDOT TYPE 7 TOP COURSE
NYSDOT TYPE 3 BINDER COURSESEPARATION FABRIC
COMPACTEDSUBGRADE
NO. 2 STONE
8"
4"
WAUSUA PRESSED CONCRETEPLANKPAVERS; 6" X 36"
ASPHALT MASTIC
TYPE 1 NYSDOT ASPHALT BASE
NO. 2 CRUSHED STONE
COMPACTED SUB-BASE
7"
8"
2" MINIMUM
18"MINIMUM
ON COMPACTEDEARTH SUB-BASE
TACK COAT
8"
4"
4000 PSI CONCRETE, 6X6 WWM, ON CHAIRS
No 2 STONE GRANULAR BASE
COMPACTED SUB-BASE
6' X 6'4000PSICONCRETEPAVERS
72"
72"
12"
12" EXPANSION JOINT72"
36"
6' X 3'4000PSICONCRETEPAVERS
12" WIDTH
JOINT SEALANTPREVENT BOND USED FORTHIN, LIGHTLY LOADEDSLABS- UP TO 4" THICKNESS
DETAILS
GRÜENENFELDERL A N D S C A P EARCHITECTURE466 KENNEDY HALLITHACA, NY 14853
TOW
ER R
OAD
REC
ON
STRU
CTIO
NCO
RNEL
L U
NIV
ERSI
TYIT
HAC
A, N
Y
DATE ISSUES & REVISIONS NO.2.7.13 SCHEMATIC DESIGN 12.14.13 DEMOLITION PLAN 22.21.13 LAYOUT PLAN 33.14.13 INTERIM REVIEW 44.4.13 DETAIL REVIEW 54.18.13 LIGHTING PLAN 64.30.13 FINAL REVIEW 7
DRAWN BY: SPENSER GRUENENFELDERLA 3180: SITE CONSTRUCTION
PROFESSOR PETER TROWBRIDGE
DRAWING SCALE: VARIES
SHEET #
L701
SCALE_1"=1'
SILT_FENCE_SECTION1A 1B SILT_FENCE_ELEVATIONSCALE_1"=1' 2A CONSTRUCTION_FENCE_SECTION
SCALE_1/2"=1' 2B CONST_FENCE_ELEVSCALE_1/2"=1'
3 ASPHALT_PAVEMENTSCALE_2"=1' 4 PLANKPAVERS_ON_ASPHALT_BASE
SCALE_1"=1'
6 MEDIUM_DUTY_CONRETESCALE_1/4"=1'
SCALE_1/4"=1'
GRANITE_CURB5
NOTES:1. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALLBE AT A MAXIMUM SPACINGOF 24 FEET2. THE EXPANSION JOINTS OFTHE CURB FACING SHALL LINEUP WITH THE EXPANSIONJOINTS OF THE CONCRETESIDEWALKS, WHEREVERPOSSIBLE3. SURFACE TO BE CLEANEDAND PAINTED AS PER NYSDOTSTANDARD HIGHWAYSPECIFICATIONS
FROM HWY STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAILS, NYSDOT
7A SIDEWALK_PLANSCALE_1/2"=1' 7B CONCRETE_EXPANSION_JOINT
SCALE_3"=1'
PRO
DU
CED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ESK
ED
UC
ATI
ON
AL
PRO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY A
N A
UTO
DESK
EDU
CA
TION
AL PR
OD
UC
T
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
the GoWanuS foreSt
project deScription:The Gowanus Forest project attempted to create the 81st Experimental Forest for the United States Forest Service in Brooklyn, New York along the Gowanus Canal. This heavily polluted canal would be transformed into a forested corridor in the city where stormwater could be sent through a series of wetland types to be naturally filtered of debris before being introduced into the canal. These wetland types would serve as tidal wetlands that absorbed nutrients and discarded waste with the changing tides. This provides an alternate system for capturing polluted stormwater instead of putting the sewer system over-capacity and relying on outfalls to discard excess waste.
video
Stormwater Wetlands are shallow, constructed wetlands designed to capture CSO discharge and stormwater runoff and allow it to filter through vegetation and soils for the purpose of contaminant and sediment removal and overall improvement in habitat in the Gowanus Canal. In addition to improving wildlife habitat, stormwater wetlands provide clean-er, aesthetically pleasing areas with improved water quality and opportunities
for educating the public.
They could be used to intercept urban runoff and CSO dis-charges. A gravel forebay will be placed directly at the CSO to trap sewage and allow it to settle and absorb through the gravel filter. Vegetation within the wetland acts to reduce stormwater runoff velocity and trap sediments and pollut-ants as the runoff flows through the wetland. The wetland system would be protected from potentially erosive tidal action by a concrete retaining wall that would allow CSO discharge and stormwater to filter through the wetland and
drain through an outlet weir into the Canal.
Spenser Gruenenfelder
Gravel forebay
Concrete Retaining Wall
Gravel forebay
CSO Outfall
Soil Filter
Micropools
CSO Outfall
Gravel forebay
Soil Filter
Urban runoff
Urban runoff
Water Level
Carroll St. Bridge
CSO OutfallOH-007
Outlet Weir
Outlet Weir
Transitional Wetlands create a gently sloping vegetated transitional zone between upland and open water habitats. They are designed to be partially flooded during regular high tides and function to provide improvements to fish and wildlife habitat, in-crease local biodiversity and productivity, and remove sediments and pollutants from water in or entering the Gowanus Canal. The topogra-phy transitions from existing upland habitat to high and low marsh areas, sloping gradually into the Canal. Microtopographic changes allow creation of a variety of habitats, including pools, low and high marsh, mudflat, and possibly upland herbaceous or shrub areas.
Spenser Gruenenfelder
Urban runoff
Urb
an r
unof
f
Urban runoff
Soil Filter
Water Level
Upland
High MarshLow Marsh
Upland
High Marsh
Low Marsh
Tidal Pool
Mudflat
Mudflat
la 3010: inteGratinG theory and practice; la 3160: Site enGineerinG
fall 2012
By creating a Terraced Wetland with a series of flat terraces at varying elevations, it can reduce the velocity of stormwater runoff from upslope areas and provide a more diverse wetland and wildlife habitat. With the lower terrace experiencing diurnal tidal flushing, it provides the op-portunity to increase biodiversity and productivity by providing two different habitats (pool habitats and high and low marsh areas) and addressing two different issues of cleansing stormwater runoff
and water quality and biodiversity within the canal.
Spenser Gruenenfelder
Urban runoff Urban runoff
Runoff
Upper Terrace
Lower Terrace
Soil Filter
Retaining Wall
Outlet WeirHigh Tide Line
Low Tide Line
Upper Terrace
Outlet Weir Outlet Weir
Lower Terrace Retaining Wall
Outlet WeirsSoil Filter
Upper TerraceLower TerraceWater Level
jekyll iSland amphitheater
project deScription:As a part of the Jekyll Island, Georgia Master Plan, the renovation of the amphitheater was one of eight design projects on the island. The project would include new turf-tiered seating to replace the existing stadium seats, a covered stage emulating a seabird, a series of interpretive recreational trails, and birding platforms including a wood stork rookery along the lake. Many seabirds visit this area of the island, so the the objective was to continue to have conditions to attract these birds and provide educational opportunities on site to learn about them. This was a group project on which I provided many of the illustrations, SketchUp renderings and a video walkthrough of the site.
jekyll iSland authority and the fanninG inStitute at the univerSity of GeorGia
Summer 2012
Covered Stage
Turf-tiered seating
Birding PlatformTicket Booth
WALKING
Charles BaileyEmily GouldSpenser GruenenfelderMichelle Kim
The Roman Street: An Assessment of Rome’s Walkability
CRP 4160 Cornell in Rome Spring 2012
the roman Street: an aSSeSSment of rome’S Walkability
WALKING
Charles BaileyEmily GouldSpenser GruenenfelderMichelle Kim
The Roman Street: An Assessment of Rome’s Walkability
CRP 4160 Cornell in Rome Spring 2012
project deScription:This study evaluated walkability in Rome by assessing the extent to which the built environment accomodated the presence of people. We identified and examined four street types: the Medieval Street, the Post-Unification Secondary Road, the Post-Unification Artery, and the Ancient Consular Road. Case studies of four subject roads were used to assess a number of criteria show in the literature to impact street aesthetics and functionality. The study concluded with policy suggestions for place-makers to consider in the walkability of Rome. My research focus was on via Principe Amadeo, the Post-Unification Secondary Road. I also provided graphic assistance with SketchUp and Illustrator.
crp 4160: rome WorkShop
SprinG 2012
Table of Contents
Introducing Walkability
The Four Roman Streets
Evaluating Rome’s Streets
Policy Suggestions
6
11
36
42
Garbatella neiGhborhood Study: rome, italy
project deScription:The Garbatella Neighborhood Study researched this historic residential neighborhood and investigated its transformation from a working class rural housing project (Prewar) to a highly desirable residential area (Postwar). Using census data we conducted statistical analyses to see how significant the social and economic disparities were between the older working class communities and the new residents. We also conducted street interviews with many of the residents and visitors to the area and had them draw Lynch Maps to see what they considered points of interest in the community. At right, are a few statistical findings and the poster summary of the findings of our report.
Garbatella
Postwar Garbatella significantly outperforms Prewar Garbatella in both education level and em-ployment. There is a significantly higher proportion in Postwar Gar-batella’s male population with high school and university diplo-mas, while most of the Prewar Garbatella male population has a middle or primary school diplo-ma. A higher percentage of the workforce population in Postwar Garbatella is also actively seeking employment or working in the la-bor market. Postwar Garbatella’s unemployment rate (5.73%) also outperforms Prewar Garbatella (11.59%).
Neighborhood Study
IntroductIon
Garbatella is a historical residential neighborhood developed under the influence of Ebenezer Howard’s Garden City concept during the 1920’s. The neighborhood is located about 5 kilometers south of central Rome, a rural public housing development designated for the working class during its first development phases prior to World War II. This was a critical period because a large influx of working class population migrated into the area during Mussolini’s era in the 1920’s and 30’s. Today, Garbatella is in a central location that is well-connected by the ATAC metro and bus systems. This makes it one of the most desirable residential areas in contemporary Rome.
The neighborhood study investigates: 1) the transformation of Garbatella from a working class rural development to a central and highly desired residential area. 2) the social and economic disparities between the working class communities and the neighborhood’s new residents. The study area is divided into Prewar Garbatella, consisting mainly of low-density public housing units, and Postwar Garbatella, consisting of high-density market value apartment units.
the neIghborhood todayAs shown from the time sequence maps, the majority of Prewar Garbatella was built during Mussolini’s time. A section of newer developments in the 1990’s includes the large market space that is currently occupied by La Strada CSOA. New high-density residential units were built post-war when the area eventually became a central area of Rome.
Public housing policies have kept a large working class community in Prewar Garbatella despite its prime location on the real estate market. Because the housing units are desirable, and because public housing policies protect working class residents’ rights in the area, most residents tend to pass down their Garbatella units to their next generations. While these public housing units are becoming privatized, available units are extremely difficult to find. Because of this, a strong working class community continues to resist the transformation around it. Meanwhile, contemporary developments in Postwar Garbatella are creating a different urban image of the area. For instance, the Cavalcaferrovia bridge, once completed, will connect Garbatella directly to Via Ostiense a major transportation route into central Rome.
This phenomenon has created the social and economic distinctions between Prewar and Postwar Garbatella. Residents in Postwar Garbatella are living in this highly desirable central area by meeting the high market value standards, while the working class residents in Prewar Garbatella have the legacy of residing in the neighborhood since Mussolini’s era.
La Strada cSoa
The decline of the industrial economy in the developed world after the 1970s was concurrent with Western governments adopting neoliberal fiscal policies. In European cities, a counter-cultural movement developed in which activists would occupy derelict industrial buildings and stage events for their local communities. These occupied facilities came to be called social centers (abbreviated CSOA in Italian), and were especially popular in Italian cities. Garbatella’s main social center, called La Strada, is run entirely by volunteers, and is legally recognized in its current space near the Palladium Theater. It pays its bills with the revenue obtained from concert ticket and beverage sales, and is run entirely by volunteers. Its antifascist philosophy pervades the various community events it holds and the services it provides.
Land uSe
1925 1935 1960 1990
Built as of previous benchmark year
New construction in interim period
StatIStIcaL anaLySIS
Residential/Commercial
Institutional
High-Density Residential
Public Space
Medium-Density Residential
Low-Density Residential
Education Level of Male Population
Labor Pool
The rear entrance to La Strada CSOA, a social center in the study area.
A typical arrangment of a Garden City lotto, or block, in which there is a central open space accessible to all community members.
Postwar Garbatella
Prewar Garbatella
Population Distribution in Study Area
Postwar vs. Prewar Garbatella Unemployment Rate
Postwar Garbatella66%
Prewar Garbatella34%
Unemployment Rate vs Rome Average
crp 4160: rome WorkShop
SprinG 2012
hortuS urbiS: appia antica park- rome, italy
4.0000
4.0000
2.0000
9.0000
9.0000
3.0000
20.0000
9.0000
1.00002.0000
10.0000
2.0000
1.0000
2.0000
2.0000
scala 1: 5.000
PR
OD
UC
ED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ES
K E
DU
CA
TIO
NA
L P
RO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PR
OD
UC
ED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ES
K E
DU
CA
TION
AL P
RO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
scala 1: 5.000
PRO
DU
CED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ESK
ED
UC
ATI
ON
AL
PRO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY A
N A
UTO
DESK
EDU
CA
TION
AL PR
OD
UC
T
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
scala 1: 5.000
PRO
DU
CED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ESK
ED
UC
ATI
ON
AL
PRO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY A
N A
UTO
DESK
EDU
CA
TION
AL PR
OD
UC
T
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
project deScription:‘Hortus Urbis’ is the first vegetable garden in Rome focused solely on ancient Roman plants.The garden is divided into symbolic, culinary, and medicinal plants that only the ancient Romans would have used. The garden also includes a ‘forno’ or oven that is made of ‘terra cruda’ bricks from the clay directly from the ground at the site. Each Sunday we held new activities for children and families such as creating signs for the different plants in the garden or planting bulbs. The garden is run solely on volunteer effort and the generous contributions of local urban gardeners. I worked on this garden from inception to implementation.
To learn more visit:www.hortusurbis.it
4.0000
4.0000
2.0000
9.0000
9.0000
3.0000
20.0000
9.0000
1.00002.0000
10.0000
2.0000
1.0000
2.0000
2.0000
scala 1: 5.000
PR
OD
UC
ED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ES
K E
DU
CA
TIO
NA
L P
RO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PR
OD
UC
ED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ES
K E
DU
CA
TION
AL P
RO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
scala 1: 5.000
PRO
DU
CED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ESK
ED
UC
ATI
ON
AL
PRO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY A
N A
UTO
DESK
EDU
CA
TION
AL PR
OD
UC
T
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
scala 1: 5.000
PRO
DU
CED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ESK
ED
UC
ATI
ON
AL
PRO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY A
N A
UTO
DESK
EDU
CA
TION
AL PR
OD
UC
T
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
Studio uap: rome, italy
SprinG 2012
cornell Student memorial Garden la 2010: medium of the landScape
fall 2011
project deScription:My objective was to create a Cornell Student Memorial Garden for all Cornell students who lost their lives while students at Cornell whether from accidents, illness, or suicide. I wanted to create a permanent landmark where they all could be remembered. The spiraling shapes represent the turbulence of life and how it is ever-changing and should be handled with great care. A small stream runs through the garden symbolizing peace and tranquility. The design also draws from the Japanese art of zen gardens as a place for quite contemplation and reflection. The sand in front of the memorial stones can be used by loved ones to write messages for those they have lost.
ilr courtyard renovation la 1420: GroundinG in landScape arch.SprinG 2011
tutel: leGo city
project deScription:This has been an ongoing project since I was in the 6th Grade. I constructed this lego city, titled ‘Tutel’ using the means available to me (legos, paper models, Knex). I photographed it in 2008 when we decided to take it down from our sun porch. In the summer of 2011, I decided to gather the disparate pieces and construct a SketchUp model of the entire city. This has been an ongoing project every summer since 2011. I hope to expand this model into other programs and texture and render the final product. Each building and section of the city has a unique story about its development, and the entire city has an elaborate backstory I have constructed since I was 12 years old.
perSonal project
Summer 2003, 2011, to preSent