spice for knowledge management - pdf version
TRANSCRIPT
SpiCE for Knowledge ManagementTimothy Maciag
Doctoral Defense | April 14, 2016 | RICE lab, 9:00am
Department of Computer Science | University of Regina
Introduction
• Context/KM around the room
• Motivations
• SpiCE• Spime + Culture of Participation + Ethical Decision-making
• Egg SpiCE
• Conclusions & current/future work
• Acknowledgements
It’s all about this crazy thing called
Knowledge “Management”
It’s all about this crazy thing called
Knowledge “Management”
Decision-making
It’s all about this crazy thing called
Knowledge “Management”
Decision-making
It’s all about this crazy thing called
Knowledge “Management”
Decision-making
Ethics
It’s all about this crazy thing called
Knowledge “Management”
Decision-making
Education
Learning
Ethics
It’s all about this crazy thing called
Knowledge “Management”
Data
Information Decision-making
Education
Learning
Ethics
It’s all about this crazy thing called
Knowledge “Management”
Data
Information
Mining
search & scent Decision-making
Education
Learning
Ethics
Motivation
• KM has been around as a thing for 40 or so odd years (*)
• Has it been a success?
(*) Lambe, Prusak, and Snowden (2008): https://vimeo.com/86950879
http://gapingvoid.com/blog/2007/08/20/complicated/
Motivation
• KM has been around as a thing for 40 or so odd years (*)
• Has it been a success?
• Good frameworks for KM exist, but can a more sustainable blueprint be provided?
(*) Lambe, Prusak, and Snowden (2008): https://vimeo.com/86950879
Motivation
• KM has been around as a thing for 40 or so odd years (*)
• Has it been a success?
• Good frameworks for KM exist, but can a more sustainable blueprint be provided?
• SECI
(*) Lambe, Prusak, and Snowden (2008): https://vimeo.com/86950879
Motivation
• KM has been around as a thing for 40 or so odd years (*)
• Has it been a success?
• Good frameworks for KM exist, but can a more sustainable blueprint be provided?
• SECI
• Cynefin
(*) Lambe, Prusak, and Snowden (2008): https://vimeo.com/86950879
Motivation
• KM has been around as a thing for 40 or so odd years (*)
• Has it been a success?
• Good frameworks for KM exist, but can a more sustainable blueprint be provided?
• SECI
• Cynefin
• KCS
(*) Lambe, Prusak, and Snowden (2008): https://vimeo.com/86950879 http://library.serviceinnovation.org/KCS_Practices_Guide/030/030
Motivation
• KM has been around as a thing for 40 or so odd years (*)
• Has it been a success?
• Good frameworks for KM exist, but can a more sustainable blueprint be provided?
• SECI
• Cynefin
• KCS
• CoP
(*) Lambe, Prusak, and Snowden (2008): https://vimeo.com/86950879 http://kpopkollective.com/2013/10/31/communities-of-practice-in-digital-humanities/
Motivation
• KM has been around as a thing for 40 or so odd years (*)
• Has it been a success?
• Good frameworks for KM exist, but can a more sustainable blueprint be provided?
• SECI
• Cynefin
• KCS
• CoP
• SER
(*) Lambe, Prusak, and Snowden (2008): https://vimeo.com/86950879
Motivation
• KM has been around as a thing for 40 or so odd years (*)
• Has it been a success?
• Good frameworks for KM exist, but can a more sustainable blueprint be provided?• SECI• Cynefin• KCS• CoP• SER• OT/MOOC – finally a hint of what it
could be!
(*) Lambe, Prusak, and Snowden (2008): https://vimeo.com/86950879
SpiCE
• Spime wrangling
• Culture of participation
• Ethical decision-making/praxis
SpiCE
• Spime wrangling
• Culture of participation
• Ethical decision-making/praxis
https://lasindias.com/el-largo-camino-hacia-la-ciudad-etiquetada
SpiCE
• Spime wrangling
• Culture of participation
• Ethical decision-making/praxis
SpiCE
• Spime wrangling
• Culture of participation
• Ethical decision-making/praxis
SpiCE
• Spime wrangling
• Culture of participation
• Ethical decision-making/praxis
http://john.do/discovering-you/
SpiCE
• Spime wrangling
• Culture of participation
• Ethical decision-making/praxis
https://unikeyword.wordpress.com/2015/02/17/prosumer/
SpiCE
• Spime wrangling
• Culture of participation
• Ethical decision-making/praxis
https://thedailyomnivore.net/2012/04/11/
SpiCE
• Spime wrangling
• Culture of participation
• Ethical decision-making/praxis
http://ictevangelist.com/why-i-love-gapingvoid-conversation-on-educationux/
SpiCE
• Spime wrangling
• Culture of participation
• Ethical decision-making/praxis
http://www.infed.org/biblio/b-praxis.htm
People, Technology, ProcessIdeas & “Remixed” Innovations
People, Technology, ProcessIdeas & “Remixed” Innovations
People, Technology, ProcessIdeas & “Remixed” Innovations
FSF/Stallman SpiCE
The freedom to run a program for any purpose The freedom to openly cross-culturally learn and create knowledge without boundary
The freedom to study how a program works and adapt it to specific needs
The freedom to openly learn and reflect upon created knowledge for decision-making
The freedom to redistribute copies of the original software code and working program(s)
The freedom to collect, capture, and share unfiltered and unbiased structured data for knowledge creation
The freedom to (re)distribute copies of modified (adapted) versions of the software code and working program(s)
The freedom to interact with others to share and evolve knowledge and experiences to form habits that are sustaining, or that can enable praxis
People, Technology, ProcessIdeas & “Remixed” Innovations
http://gapingvoid.com/blog/2007/04/09/the-network/
People, Technology, ProcessIdeas & “Remixed” Innovations
People, Technology, ProcessIdeas & “Remixed” Innovations
http://sci2s.ugr.es/dicits/index.php?p=software
People, Technology, ProcessIdeas & “Remixed” Innovations
http://gerardnico.com/wiki/data_mining/association
People, Technology, ProcessIdeas & “Remixed” Innovations
People, Technology, ProcessIdeas & “Remixed” Innovations
People, Technology, ProcessIdeas & “Remixed” Innovations
Respect for Mepham TTL Imp
Stakeholder AutonomyFairnessWell-being
Social (people)Economic(profit)Environment (planet)
…
TTL = Triple Top Line | Imp = Implications
People, Technology, ProcessIdeas & “Remixed” Innovations
Egg SpiCE
• Food sustainability
http://www.sustainablecitiesinstitute.org/topics/food-systems
Egg SpiCE
• Food sustainability
• Building knowledge through narratives and surveys• 21 local participants with a variety of
background
http://www.storycoloredglasses.com/p/participatory-narrative-inquiry.html
Egg SpiCE
• Food sustainability
• Building knowledge through narratives and surveys• 21 local participants with a variety of
background
• Egg SpiCE configuration• Starting with the idea of SOLE food
Stakeholders
Producers
Consumers
Animals
Plants
Land
Egg SpiCE
• Food sustainability
• Building knowledge through narratives and surveys• 21 local participants with a variety of
background
• Egg SpiCE configuration• Starting with the idea of SOLE food
Respect for Mepham TTL Implication
Consumers Fairness:affordablefood
Economic Good price
Social Availability of quality selections
… … … …
Animals Autonomy: Behavioral freedom
Social Free range, maximum space
… … … …
Egg SpiCE
• Food sustainability
• Building knowledge through narratives and surveys• 21 local participants with a variety of
background
• Egg SpiCE configuration• Starting with the idea of SOLE food
Egg SpiCE
• Food sustainability
• Building knowledge through narratives and surveys• 21 local participants with a variety of
background
• Egg SpiCE configuration• Starting with the idea of SOLE food
Egg SpiCE
• Food sustainability
• Building knowledge through narratives and surveys• 21 local participants with a variety of
background
• Egg SpiCE configuration• Starting with the idea of SOLE food
• Technology design• Live demo: http://spice.cs.uregina.ca/
http://spice.cs.uregina.ca/
Egg SpiCE
• Food sustainability
• Building knowledge through narratives and surveys• 21 local participants with a variety of
background
• Egg SpiCE configuration• Starting with the idea of SOLE food
• Technology design• Live demo: http://spice.cs.uregina.ca/
• Follow-up/usability/utility study
http://vedhamanikandan.blogspot.ca/2012/06/user-experience-in-mobility.html
Conclusion, current & future work
• Context: • Lots of good frameworks for KM• Still the struggle in finding sustainable solutions
Conclusion, current & future work
• Context: • Lots of good frameworks for KM• Still the struggle in finding sustainable solutions
• Motivation: • Frameworks can be “remixed” to provide better blueprint for sustained KM success• Focus on people, technology, process key
Conclusion, current & future work
• Context: • Lots of good frameworks for KM• Still the struggle in finding sustainable solutions
• Motivation: • Frameworks can be “remixed” to provide better blueprint for sustained KM success• Focus on people, technology, process key
• SpiCE: • Successful in engaging interest• Deeper analysis is required for Egg SpiCE/Food SpiCE• SpiCE at eHealth > Quite successful
Conclusion, current & future work
• Context: • Lots of good frameworks for KM• Still the struggle in finding sustainable solutions
• Motivation: • Frameworks can be “remixed” to provide better blueprint for sustained KM success• Focus on people, technology, process key
• SpiCE: • Successful in engaging interest• Deeper analysis is required for Egg SpiCE/Food SpiCE• SpiCE at eHealth > Quite successful
• Future work: • Full implementation, analysis of social computing/KM engagement, and analysis of
SpiCE for life-long learning
Acknowledgements & Q/A• My wife and family: Nova Scheidt, Anna and Joe Maciag, Joey, Krista (Alex),
and Tess (Geoff, Harry, Ollie, and Ella) Park-Maciag, Ajay and Kim Fahlman• My supervisor: Daryl Hepting• My committee/chair: Katherine Arbuthnott, JoAnn Jaffe, Howard
Hamilton, Bob Hilderman, Dominik Slezak, Lisa Watson, Marjorie Delbaere, Paul Laforge
• My office mates: Richard Spring and Sean Targett• My work mates: Jacky Hoffert, Cindy Ikola-Gellner, Shannon Waugh,
Murray Webb, Ron Burnell, Kirsty Jewsbury, James Anderson, NorineJanzen, Tina Neudorf, Margo Brown, Danica Navarro, Adam Chomos, Sarah Wynn, Brenton Wilson, Chris Zimmer
• Others: Harvey Hill, Jim Wright (Nature’s Best), Andy Knoll (Body Fuel Organics), Rick Morrell (Eat Healthy Foods), The Pusch Brothers, JaneenCovlin, all of my study participants