spm physics paper3 nota
DESCRIPTION
spm physicsTRANSCRIPT
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
1/52
Diagram 3.1 shows the light from the wall producing a sharp image on the
screen after passing through a glass filled with water.
Diagram 3.2 shows the light from a table lamp is passing through the same
glass filled with the same amount of water. The lamp is not lighted.
The sharp image is only obtained when the white screen is moved further
from the glass.
inference : The image distance depends on object distance
hypothesis : If the object distance is shorter / decreases, the image distance
will be longer / increasesaim of experiment : To investigate the relationship between the object
distance, u and image distance, v of the convex lens.
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
2/52
variables :
Manipulatd variable : object distance, u
Responding variable : Image distance, vconstant variable : Focal length, f of the convex lens
list of apparatus and materials : Convex lens, bulb with holder, 12 V a.c power supply,
white screen, cardboard with triangular hole fixed with cross wire, plasticine and meterrule
arrangement of the apparatus :
method :
1. A convex lens with focal length, f = 10 cm is set up as shown in thediagram.
2. The distance between the cross wires and the convex lens, u (objectdistance) = 30.0 cm is measured (using metre rule)
3. The power supply is switched on.4. The white screen is moved back and forth until a sharp image is formed on
the screen .
5. The distance between the screen and lens, v ( image distance v) is measured6. The experiment is repeated with u = 26.0cm, 22.0 cm, 18.0 cm and 14.0cm
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
3/52
Diagram 4.1 and Diagram 4.2 show a driller.
In Diagram 4.1, the 4.5 V batteries are used and the drill bit penetrated moreinto the wall.
In Diagram 4.2, the 3.0 V batteries are used and the drill bit penetrated less
into the wall.
inference :Penetration distance depends on potential difference,p.d //Force depends on potential difference,p.d /current
hypothesis : As the p.d /current increases the penetration distance /force
increasesaim of the experiment: To investigate the relationship between the current
/voltage and the distance travelledvariable:
Manipulated : electric current/ voltage
Responding : distance travelledConstant variable : strength of the magnet // number of magnetsL ist out apparatus and mater ials :magnadur magnets , U- shaped iron
yoke , copper rod, d.c power supply, ammeter, metre ruler, bare copper wire,
rheostat
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
4/52
arrangement of the apparatus :
method :1. The magnets is set as shown in diagram.2. The d.c. power supply is switched on. The rheostat is adjusted until
the reading of ammeter is I = 0.5 A
3. The distance of copper rod moves on the bare copper wire from theinitial position to final position, d is measured using a metre ruler
4. The experiment is repeated with I = 1.0 A, 1.5 A, 2.0 A, and 2.5 A
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
5/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
6/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
7/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
8/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
9/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
10/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
11/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
12/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
13/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
14/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
15/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
16/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
17/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
18/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
19/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
20/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
21/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
22/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
23/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
24/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
25/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
26/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
27/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
28/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
29/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
30/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
31/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
32/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
33/52
Inference:
Hypothesis:
Aim:
Constant:
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
34/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
35/52
Inference:
Hypothesis:
Aim:
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
36/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
37/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
38/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
39/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
40/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
41/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
42/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
43/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
44/52
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
45/52
Diagram 3.1 shows two wooden tops. One of the tops is partly coated with tin. Both tops are the
same size and are rotate with the same velocity,
Diagram 3.2 shows the top which is partly coated with tin able to spin longer.
Inference: The mass affected the motion of an object.
Hypothesis: Mass increases period of oscillation (time for one oscillation) increases.
Aim: To determine the relationship between mass and period of oscillation.
Manipulated variable: Mass
Responding variable: Period (time for one oscillation)
Fixed/constant variable: Length of the saw.
Apparatus: Saw, plasticine, stop watch and G clamp and ruler.
Apparatus arrangement:
Plasticine
Saw (gergaji)
G clamp
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
46/52
Procedure
1. The apparatus is set up as shown.2. 10 g plasticine is placed at the end of the saw. The plasticine is oscillated and time (t) for 20
oscillations is measured and recorded. The period of the oscillation is calculated as shown below:
20
tT
3. Step 2 is repeated by using 20 g, 30 g, 40 g and 50 g plasticine.
Tabulation:
Mass of plasticine, m (g) Time for 20 oscillations, t (s) Period, T (s)
20
tT
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
Data analysis:Mass, m (g)
Period, T (s)
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
47/52
It is advisable not to throw empty aerosol can into a burning trash because explosion can occur.
The picture below shows the condition of an empty aerosol can, after it was thrown into a
burning trash.
The pressure of gas depend on its temperature / Temperature affects the pressure of a gas
The pressure of gas increases as its temperature increases
To investigate the relationship between the pressure of gas and its temperature.
Manipulated : Temperature
Responding : The pressure of gas
Constant : Mass of gas/ Volume of gas
apparatus and materials: Thermometer, Bourdon gauge, round bottom flask , large beaker,
water, stirrer, bunsen burner, tripod stand with wire gauze
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
48/52
1. Apparatus is set as shown in the above diagram.
2. Water is heated slowly and stirred continuously to achieve equal to 300C.
3. When the temperature is at 300C, the pressure of the air, P is read from the Bourdon gauge
4. The experiment is repeated using the temperature 40 C, 500C, 600C and
700C.
Temperature/C Pressure/Pa
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
49/52
Diagram 3.1 shows that Ahmad riding at higher gradient down hill and going faster.
Diagram 3.2 shows that Ahmad riding at lower gradient down hill and going slower.
Diagram 3.1 Diagram 3.2
Final velocity depend on gradient of the hill,
Final velocity increase when the gradient increase.
To investigate the relationship between final velocity and gradient of runway.
Manipulated variable: gradient of runway
Responding variable : final velocity
Fixed variable : mass of the trolley
Ticker timer, power supply, ticker tape, trolley, runway, ruler and blocks of wood.
Ticker
tape
a.c power
supply
Trolley
Wooden
block
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
50/52
1. Set up the apparatus.
2. Height of trolley ,h is measured 20 .0 cm.
3. Ticker tape is measured dan calculated the velocity using formula ,v = s / t .
4. The experiment is repeat with the height . h = 25.0 cm, 30.0cm, 35.0 cm, and 40.0 cm.
Height,h / cm Velocity,v / cm s-1
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
Velocity,v/cms-
Height,h/cm
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
51/52
Diagram 4.1 shows one eureka wire 10 cm long are connected across two points X and Y.
Diagram 4.2 shows two eureka wire 10 cm long are connected across two points X and Y
Inference : The resistance of the constantans wire affec ted by the cross-sectional area of the
wire
Hypothesis : The resistance of the conductor decreases/smaller when the crosss-sectional
area of the wire bigger.increases
Aim of experiment: To investigate the relationship between the resistance of the conductor and
its cross-sectional area at constant area.
Manipulated - Cross-sectional area
Responding - Resistance of the conductorFixed - Temperature , length , type of conductor
Ammeter, voltmeter, constantans wire(5 ) metre rule ,switch, batteries, Connecting wire,
Diagram 4.1
Diagram 4.2
-
5/28/2018 spm physics paper3 nota
52/52
i. The cross-sectional area of the conductor can be increased by
connecting 2, 3,4,5 wires across the point X and Y.
ii. The resistance is calculated by observing the reading of voltmeter and
ammeteriii. The resistance is calculated from formula
a. R = V
I
Cross-sectional
area ,AV/ V I / (A ) R / ( ) 1/ R (
-1)
1 unit
2 unit
3 unit
4 unit
5 unit
VA
A
A/unit
1/R -1