sporos program for cereals 1991-2012

SPOROS PROGRAM FOR CEREALS

Increased production

SPOROS Program Products

SPOROS dose per hectare – 13 KG

Sporos Program for Cereals 2

Sporos Humificant – 2 kgSporos Booster Fertilizer – 10 ltFylo-Bio Leaf Fertilizer – 1 lt

SPOROS Humificant preparation

1. Mix bags 1 and 2 in 10 liters of warm water and let stand for 1 hour

2. Pour the 10 liter mix in 400-600 liters of fresh water while filtering and add content of bottle 3

3. Spray over the entire field and bury 10-15cm

1.

2.

3.

NO NEEDFOR ANY SORT OF

PERSONAL PROTECTION WHEN USING

BIOMA PRODUCTS

MAIZE, Class 500 – Hybrid Pioneer PR33A46 2012 HARVEST ITALY


Test performed by ALAB – Lazio Region Association of Biologic and Biodynamic Agriculture –and monitored by ENTECRA, Italian National Counsel for Agriculture Research

Test Program on 15 Hectares

SPOROS PROGRAMDOSE

(l-kg/ha)MOMENTS AND APPLICATION TYPES

WATER VOLUME

1.Sporos

Humif icant2

1 day before sowing added to 70% Mineral Fert i l izat ion

1 Month before sowing when mixed with manure

Both buried about 15cm

400 l/ha

2.Sporos Booster

Fert i l izer 10

At the 4 th leaf stadium sprayed on moist soi l

400 l/ha

3. Fylo-Bio 1 27 days after Sporos Booster Fert i l izer 400 l/ha

TREATMENTS(Basal dressing + Top dressing)

Total UF N

1.Mineral Fert i l izat ion as per Integrated

Product ion Regulat ions of the Lazio Region240 N; 80 P2O5; 75 K2O

2.SPOROS Program + 70% of Mineral

Fert i l izat ion as per Integrated Product ion Regulat ions of the Lazio Region

168N; 56 P2O5; 52 K2O

3. SPOROS Program + Organic Fert i l izat ion Bovine Manure 60 T/Ha


Each Program was tested on a 5 Hectares area

Soil Analysis

Before fertilization 6 samples have been collected in the center and along the diagonals of each field to determine the median chemical-physical characteristics of the soil


Parameter cm 0-30 cm 30-50

pH in Water 1:2.5 7.8 8.0

CSC (meq/100g) 19.86 20.98

Organic matter (%) 1.11 0.79

N Total (%) 0.041 0.033

P Absorbable(mg/kg)

31.3 18.2

Clay (%) 18.8 23.1

Silt (%) 16.8 19.2

Sand (%) 64.4 57.7

Texture USDA FS FS

ParameterMineral

FertilizationSporos + 70%

Min. Fert.Sporos +

Organic Fert.

Organic matter (%) 1.09 a 1.16 a 1.29 b

CSC (meq/100g) 19.52 a 19.74 a 20.15 a

N Total (%) 0.038 a 0.040 a 0.052 b

Apparent Density (kg/dm) 1.37 a 1.38 a 1.31 a

Index of aggregate stability

20.26 a 21.56 a 22.86 a

At harvest again 6 samples of soil and 6 of maize have been collected and analyzed. Only the cm 0-20 measure is reported in the following table

Values on the same line followed by the same letter are statistically not different at 5% probability test (Duncan test)

Grain Results

Median production yield of maize grain (15.5% humidity)

Results of Sporos Program compared to Mineral Fertilization:

11% increase in production with Sporos Program + 70% Mineral fertilization

8.2% increase in production with Sporos Program + Bovine Manure


ParameterMineral

FertilizationSporos +

70% Min. Fert.Sporos +

Organic Fert.

Maize grain production (T/Ha in dry substance)

13.91 a 15.44 b 15.05 b

Values on the same line followed by the same letter are statistically not different at 5% probability test (Duncan test)

MAIZE, Class 600 – Alicia Pioneer 1996 HARVEST ITALY


Test performed by Bellotti S.N.C. Pavia, Italy

Test Program on 1 Hectare

Maize was harvested 128 days after sowing

73% increase in production 19 tons vs. 11 tons in previous harvest (28% humidity)


SPOROS PROGRAMDOSE

(l-kg/ha)

MOMENTS AND APPLICATION TYPES WATER VOLUME

1.Sporos

Humif icant2

At plowing after shedding of catt le s lurry and buried about 15cm about

two week before sowing400 l/ha

2.Sporos Booster

Fert i l izer 10

Immediately after sowing on Apri l 18, 1996

400 l/ha

3. Fylo-Bio 1 When Maize reached the s ize of about

50-60cm400 l/ha

SORGHUM Sucross and MAIZE Tramo1994 HARVEST MEXICO


Test performed by ProcalseFarm in Poncitlán, Jalisco State, Mexico, and monitored by Megafarma S.A. de C.V.

Sorghum Sucross (Forage sorghum) on 1Ha

SPOROS PROGRAMDOSE

(l-kg/ha)

DATE & TIME APPLICATION TYPES WATER VOLUME

1.Sporos

Humif icant2

20 June 1994 at 1:00pm

Sprayed on the soi l and buried about 15cm

400 l/ha

2.SporosBooster

Fert i l izer 10

14 July 1994 at 11:30am

Sprayed on the soi l 400 l/ha


Total UF N

1. SPOROS PROGRAM -

2. Chemical Fert i l izat ion Program 350kg/ha TRIPLE 17 (N-P-K)


The Sucross Sorghum is a forage variety used in Mexico

The 1 Ha parcel was divided two areas of 3720m2, one treated with SPOROS Program and the other with chemical fertilizers

46’500 seeds seeds were planted in each area

Results


FORAGE SORGHUM CROP

Treated area 3’720 m2

Production 24.57 ton

Production per Ha (calculated) 66.05 ton

Normal production per Ha 42-45 ton

Yield difference % 46%-57%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

SPOROS PROGRAM CONVENTIONAL

66.05

45.00

ton/h

ecta

re

Visual


Chemical Sporos Production

Maize Tramo (Forage maize) on 1Ha

SPOROS PROGRAMDOSE

(l-kg/ha)

DATE & TIME APPLICATION TYPES WATER VOLUME

1.Sporos

Humif icant2

20 June 1994 at 1:00pm

Sprayed on the soi l and buried about 15cm

400 l/ha

2.SporosBooster

Fert i l izer 10

14 July 1994 at 11:30am

Sprayed on the soi l 400 l/ha


Total UF N

1. SPOROS PROGRAM -

2. Chemical Fert i l izat ion Program 350kg/ha TRIPLE 17 (N-P-K)


The Tramo Maize is a forage variety used in Mexico

The 1 Ha parcel was divided two areas of 3720m2, one treated with SPOROS Program and the other with chemical fertilizers

46’500 seeds seeds were planted in each area

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

SPOROSPROGRAM CONVENTIONAL

76.6

47.5

Results Maize


FORAGE MAIZE CROP

Treated area 3’080 m2

Production 23.68 ton

Production per Ha (calculated) 76.6 ton

Normal production per Ha 45-50 ton

Yield difference % 53.2%-70.2%

ton/h

ecta

re

Samples Measurements

Yield per plot

Humidity

Proteins

Fiber

Direct Humidity


Conventional Sporos Program Conventional

Sample 24

Sample 21

Sample 232

Sample 231

Sample 20

Sample 223

Sample 222

Bromatological analysis

In this type of maize the protein content is very important as this forage is used to fatten cattle.

Direct humidity is another factor that the producer considers very important as correct direct humidity is central for an excellent silage.


Conventional SPOROS

ParametersSample

21Sample

24Sample

222Sample

223Sample

20Sample

231Sample

232

Humidity 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00%

Ashes 6.98% 5.40% 4.80% 3.75% 4.98% n.a. n.a.

Protein 5.69% 8.14% 7.88% 7.00% 8.49% 13.13% 9.01%

Fibers 30.97% 36.62% 25.70% 28.22% 26.01% 41.42% 34.51%

Direct Humidity 65.80% 70.30% 66.15% 66.80% 67.17% 76.83% 74.37%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Protein Fibers DirectHumidity

7.25%

30.38%

67.26%

10.21%

33.98%

72.79%

Conven onal Sporos

Protein Content:41% average increase

Fibers:12% average increase

Direct Humidity8% average increase

WHEAT – 1996 HARVEST ITALY


Test performed by the Technical Institute Carlo d’Arco and the Provincial Agricultural Consortium Mantova, Italy

Yield


Fertilizer Area m2Production

Humidity %Yield

differencet t/Ha t/Ha 13% H

11A Sporos 381.2 0.13 3.410 3.518 12.6 + 16%

11B Chemical 460.8 0.14 3.038 3.038 13.0

12A Sporos 420.8 0.185 4.396 4.885 11.7 +6.5%

12B Chemical 576.4 0.24 4.164 4.587 11.8

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

11 12

Sporos Chemical

t/ha 1

3%

hum

idity Wheat treated with Sporos show

an increase of production per hectare respectively of 16% and 6.5% compared to traditional chemical fertilizers

Quality


Fertilizer HectolitreWeight kg/hl

Piebald seed %

Broken and

shriveled seeds

%

Mottled seeds

%

Foreign particles

%

Dry gluten

%

Color

11A Sporos 80.35 12.0 5.0 4.0 1.0 13.33 21.53

11B Chemical 81.25 10.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 13.33 21.67

12A Sporos 83.90 16.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 12.50 20.02

12B Chemical 83.50 16.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 12.50 20.97

Foreing Particles

Mottled

Brocken & shriveled

PiebaldDry Gluten

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

%

In terms of quality both fertilizers show the similar values that have to be however combined with the higher yield obtained with Sporos

MAIZE – HD 420 1991 HARVEST ROMANIA


Test performed by the Research Institute of Plant Protection Bucharest ,Romania

Schedule and results


SPOROS PROGRAMDOSE

(l-kg/ha)


1.Sporos

Humif icant2



2.Sporos Booster

Fert i l izer 10 2-3 weeks after sowing 400 l/ha

% emergenceMean number ofcorn cob/plant

Mean weight of pods (gr.)

Thousand Kernel Weight (gr)

SPOROS 71.4 2.34 239.8 317.5

Conventional 74.1 2.68 171.1 295

+40% +8%

The test has been performed in triplicates and table show the mean values

Conclusions of the Research institute:

Mean weight of corn cob and TKW registered values higher than those of the conventional treatments

The application of SPOROS SPROGRAM caused yield increases and an improvement of phytosanitary status with all crops for which the substance has been experimented

SOYA – Hodgson, Altona and Amsoy Varieties1991 HARVEST ROMANIA



Schedule


SPOROS PROGRAMDOSE

(l-kg/ha)


1.Sporos

Humif icant2



2.Sporos Booster

Fert i l izer 10 2-3 weeks after sowing 400 l/ha

3 varieties of Soya were tested in 3 different locations Hodgson var. at ICPP Bucharest-BaneasaAltona var. at SCDA SecuieniAmsoy var. at CELAM S.A. Amzacea

Each test was performed over an area of 1 Hectare

Results


%emergence

Mean numberof pods/plant

Mean number of

grains/pod

Mean weightof pods (gr)

Thousand Kernel

Weight (gr)

SPOROS 79.8 75.5 2.61 0.76 178.75

Conventional 80.2 76.8 2.56 0.71 195

delta 7%

Hodgson var. at ICPP Bucharest-Baneasa

Plant mean height at harvest (cm)

Mean number ofpods/plant

Yield kg/ha

SPOROS 96.3 112 2826

Conventional 84.5 96 2337

delta 14% 17% 21%

Altona var. at SCDA Secuieni

Plant mean height 45 days

(cm)

Mean number ofpods/plant

Yield kg/haThousand Kernel

Weight (gr)

SPOROS 46.6 111.1 2611 186.5

Conventional 51.3 83.3 2050 141.6

delta -9% 33% 27% 32%

Amsoy var. at CELAM SA Amzacea

Phitosanitary Status and Quality


Attack Frequency

Bacterial disease

Peronosporamanshurica

Sclerotiniasclerotiorum

Diaporthesojae

Sclerotiumbataticola

SPOROS 2.6 3.9 2.4 21.1 39.4

Conventional 18.3 16.4 3.5 61.3 75.3

delta -86% -76% -31% -66% -48%

Phytosanitary status

Dry matter (%)

Total Proteins (%)

Vit. C mg % g.sp.

SPOROS 12.32 3.34 22.53

Conventional 9.87 2.65 17.46

delta +25% +26% +29%

Quality

Conclusions

Provided the location, in most cases increase in number of pods per plant, TKW as well as yield has been observed

-76% Downy Mildew attack (from 16.4% to 3.9%)

-48% Charcoal Rot attack from 75.5% to 39.4%


SUNFLOWER – HS 206 1991 HARVEST ROMANIA



Results and Phytosanitary Status


Plant height at 15 days

(cm)


(cm)


(cm)

Heads diameter

(cm)

Thousand Kernel Weight

(gr)

Yield kg/ha

SPOROS 3.4 31.3 96.4 33.1 76.3 2730

Conventional 2.1 29.2 91.3 26.1 51.1 2330

delta +62% +7% +5% +27% +49% +17%

PlasmoparaF%

SclerotiniaF%

Phomopsishelianthi

F%

PhomopsishelianthiLodged

plants %

Macrophomina F%

AlternariaF%

SPOROS 0 7.3 71.3 13.5 0 36.1

Conventional

1.6 21.4 98.5 17.3 5.6 79.4

delta -100% -66% -28% +22% -100% -55%

Growth, size and yield

Phytosanitary status

Thank you

BIOMA SAVia Luserte SUD 86572 QuartinoSwitzerland

Phone: +41 91 840 1015Fax: +41 91 840 1019

Web: www.bioma.comEmail: [email protected]

sporos program for cereals 1991-2012

Environment

soil sporos program

powerpoint sporos program

kgsporos program

thasporos program

cereals4each program

sporos organic fert

harvest italysporos

cereals2 sporos humificant