sport forum, 27-28 april 2015, imd lausanne - inside.fei.org one_thierry zintz.pdf · changes in...
TRANSCRIPT
Changes in Society
Towards a sports governing bodies « corporate » social
responsibility: a focus on para-sport
FEI – Para-Equestrian Forum
21 March 2015
Essen (D)
Prof. Thierry Zintz,
UCL - BOIC
Plan
1. Governing a sport organization. What’s in a name?
2. Understanding the main challenges of governance in sport
organizations
3. Behind governance: the social responsibility of sport
organizations
4. Architecture and drivers of governance in Olympic sport
organizations
5. Failures … the other side of the coin
6. To conclude: some perspectives
Governance? What’s in a name ?
An old word(16th Century)
A concept in Social sciences since the 1990’
The concept was invented in the private sector in order to protect the
shareholders
Organizational or Corporate Governance
The World Bank imponed this concept to public authorities
Political or Democratic Governance
1. Governing a sport organization.
What’s in a name?
The Governing Body Cycle(from Co-operatives UK, 2005)
1. Governing a sport organization.
What’s in a name?
Corporate world: strategic management
Prior to the 1990’s Since the 1990’s
Environnement: stable and no complexity
Reactive management:
Day to day management
Environnement: unstableand more complex
Proactive management :
Strategic management
World of sport organizations
1. Governing a sport organization.
What’s in a name?
Lessons from the strategic management theory
Managing complexity (and uncertainty) resulting from ambigiousand unforeseen situations »
•Strategic diagnostic to determine the strategic position of the
company,
•Strategic choices whereo ne has to analyze possible options and to
choose the right one(s)
•Strategic actions where one has to operate the selected strategy and to
manage change
1. Governing a sport organization.
What’s in a name?
Olympic Movement
International Sport Federations1880-1980
Asc
end
ance
Des
cen
dan
ce
Traditional popular
GamesAcademic
ArtsGymnastics Outdoor
activities
Professionalized
Sports
Competition
Sports
Leisure
Sports
Economic purpose Public purpose Playing purpose
Ligues pro, G14,
Closed ChampionshipsOlympic Movement Just
Do it
Loret, 1999 – Zintz, Camy, 2005
3 organisational models forcontemporary sport organizations
1 32
1. Governing a sport organization.
What’s in a name?
Chappelet, 2012
1. Governing a sport organization.
What’s in a name?
Pérez’s model of corporate governance (2003)
Level 1 Governance:Management
Level 2 Governance:Management of Management
Level 3 Governance:Management of governance
Level 4 Governance:Governance of governance
Level 5 Governance:Metagouvernance
How is it managed on a daily basis?
How is management controlled?
Who controls the controllers?
Overall constitutional / societal frame?
Can decisions be appealed?
External systme
Organization
« Internal system »
Action
Actor
Organization
Cooperation
UncertaintyPower
Negociation
Interests
Strategies
Understanding the environnement
2. Understanding the main challenges
of governance in sport organizations
Olympic Sport Organizations
FIs
FNs
ClubsCNOs
All these actors are non profit organisations and mostly
associations under the law of the country of their
headquarters
CIO
COJOs
Chappelet, 2012
2. Understanding the main challenges
of governance in sport organizations
Understanding the environnement
2. Understanding the main challenges
of governance in sport organizations
Pratice OC
Participants
Spectators
Paid staff Members
Clubs
Professionals
athlete
Facilities
managers
Distant
audience
Volunteers
Marketing
agencies
SponsorsMedia
Unpaid staff
Professional
leagues
IOC IFNF
Providers
Events
Sporting activities market
Environmental
Social EconomicUnderstanding micro- and
meso-environnementFerrand, Zintz
et all. 2011
2. Understanding the main challenges
of governance in sport organizations
Environmental
Social EconomicLocal
authorities
Government European
community
Financials
governing bodies, institutions,
shareholders, analysts
and entrepreneurs
Tourism
governing bodies
and entrepreneurs
Health
governing bodies
and organisations
Environmental
governing bodies
and organisations
Education
governing bodies
and organisations
Social
governing bodies
and organisations
Third parties
(opinion leaders) and
customer referrals
Issue
community
Public
opinion
User
groups
Customers
Business
governing bodies
and entrepreneurs
Environment
Understanding macro-environnement
Ferrand, Zintz
et all. 2011
Henry’s model (2004) of sport governanceAdapted from Leftwich (1994) and Arcioni (2002)
Systemic GovernanceRules of competition, cooperation and mutual adjustment
between parties involved in the production of sport
Political Governance
Steering mechanisms by
governments and sport
governing bodies
to achieve goals
Corporate Governance
Normative approach to
Managerial behaviour
of sport organisations
2. Understanding the main challenges
of governance in sport organizations
Chappelet, 2012
2. Understanding the main challenges
of governance in sport organizations
Pérez’s model adapted to the Olympic System
1
IOC Management
IOC President with IOC Administration
2
Management of IOC Management
Session, Executive Board, Commissions
3
Management of IOC governance
Nominations, Athletes & Ethics Commis.
4
Governance of IOC governance
National courts, WADA & CAS
5
IOC Metagovernance
Swiss TF and international courts
How is the
Olympic
System
governed
beyond
the Olympic
Charter?
Olympic Charter 2011, fundamental principle n°5:
“Recognising that sport occurs within the framework of society, sports
organisations within the Olympic Movement shall have the rights
and obligations of autonomy, which include freely establishing and
controlling the rules of sport, determining the structure
and governance of their organisations, enjoying the right of elections
free from any outside influence and the responsibility for ensuring
that principles of good governance be applied".
2. Understanding the main challenges
of governance in sport organizations
Basic Universal Principles of Good Governance for the Sport
Movement
1. Vision, mission and strategy
2. Structures, regulations and democratic process
3. Highest level of competence, integrity and ethical standards
4. Accountability, transparency and control
5. Solidarity and development
6. Athletes’ involvement, participation and care
7. Harmonious relations with governments while preserving autonomy
Adopted by the Olympic Congress Copenhagen 2009,
Incorporated in the Ethical code of IOC in 2010
And in the Olympic Charter in 2011
2. Understanding the main challenges
of governance in sport organizations
Autonomy requests good governance
Résolution du deuxième Séminaire sur l’Autonomie du Mouvement
Olympique et Sportif (Lausanne, 02/2008)
… De rappeler que l’Autonomie du Mouvement Olympique et Sportif
est essentielle pour le développement du sport et la promotion de ses
valeurs, au bénéfice de tous les athlètes. …
De souligner que la Bonne Gouvernance est le fondement de
l’Autonomie des organisations Olympiques et sportives et de s’assurere
que cette Autonomie est respectée par nos parties prenantes.
D’apporter un soutien de principe au document “draft” intitulé “Principes de
base universels de bonne gouvernance du Mouvement Olympique et
sportif …
2. Understanding the main challenges
of governance in sport organizations
This system is under pressure !
| 21 |
The
Olympic
System
The
Public
Sector
The
Business
World
Corporate
Governance
Democratic
Governance
Olympic
Governance?
Chappelet, 2012
2. Understanding the main challenges
of governance in sport organizations
"The IOC and the sports movement in general have a
social responsibility - to provide access to sports practice,
and in so doing to spread the values of sport to all
sections of society." Jacques Rogge (IOC website)
3. Behind governance:
the social
responsibility of sport organizations
Pedro Velasquez,EC, DG Education, Youth and
Sport, 2013
TFEU – Article 165
Specific nature of
sport
Structures based on voluntary activity
Social and educational function of
sport
Develop a European dimensionin sport by:
Contribute to the promotion of European sporting issues while
taking account of:
Promoting fairness and openness in
sporting competitions
Promoting cooperation
between bodies
responsible for sports
Protecting the physical and moral integrity of
sportspeople
Foster relations with third countries and competentinternational sport organisations
CoE IOC WADA …
4. Architecture and drivers of governance and
societal responsibility in Olympic sport organizations
5. Failures … the other side
of the coin
Fight against corruption
Fight against gigantism of the Games
Fight against doping
Fight against (illegal) betting
Fight against match fixing
Violence, racism, all form of harassment
Henry’s model (2004) of
sport governanceadapted from Leftwich (1994)
Arcioni, 2002
Systemic GovernanceRules of competition, cooperation and mutual adjustment
between parties involved in the production of sport
Political Governance
Steering mechanisms by
governments and sport
governing bodies
to achieve goals
Corporate Governance
Normative approach to
Managerial behaviour
of sport organisations
Understandingthe process of change
Conductingthe process of change
1 2
5 major areas
Organization’s goalsStakeholdersShareholders
Deciders
Volunteer boardGovernance tools
Missions, as conditionsOrganisation
MHRSupport
Relation whith pertinent environnement
New governance
Think global, act local
6. To conclude:
some perspectives
Clarification of five major areas for a new governance (1)
1.Missions
2.Organisation
3.HRM
Governance strategies => Missions / Environnement•Core-business ?•Diversification ?•Multi-dimensional business?
Flat organigramme (instead of vertical) => operationality, adaptability, fonctionnality, impacting missions
•Adjustment betwwen competencies and functions for paid staff and volunteers within the board•Supporting - educating (motivation)
4.Support
5.Relation to pertinent environment
Supporting associations requests•A variety of services•A variety of strategies
1. Mutualizedservices,
2. Tools
•Information systems•Internal and external audits•Labellisation•Strategic contracts
The project of sportorganizations is more than a sport project
Clarification of five major areas for a new governance (2)
5 dimensions of a renewed governance
Professionalization
A new paradigm
A new corporate governanceand CSR
for sport organizations
« Les organisations sportives, traditionnellement impliquées dans
des activités dites de non-profit, sont de plus en plus tenues pour
responsables de l’utilisation qu’elles font des subventions publiques et de
l’affectation desressources qu’elles obtiennent de leurs
membres et de leurs partenaires. Il en résulte
une évolution incontournable vers plus de professionnalisation »
Turner, in Beech& Cahdwick,
2007
2013
5 projects financed by the European Union in the famework of « Preparatory Actions »
Governance and Grassroot Sport: ISCA
Sport for Good Governance: COE
Sport Governance Observer: Play the Game
Supporters Direct
Sport & Recreation Alliance
6. To conclude :
some perspectives….
And concreet initiatives
Recent initiatives linked to governance and CSR of sport organizations
granted by the European Union
« La véritable découverte du voyage ne consiste pas à trouver de nouveaux territoires mais d’avoir un
nouveau regard »
Marcel Proust
« Avant de penser le changement,il faut changer la pensée »
D’après Henri Bergson
Thank you for your
attention!
Thierry Zintz
Université catholique de Louvain
Chaire Olympique Henri de Baillet Latour & Jacques Rogge
en Management des organisations sportives
http://www.uclouvain.be/chaire-olympique
@ThierryZintz