spring 2010 graduate student survey results by degree ...€¦ · spring 2010 graduate student...

UW College of Education Office of Institutional Research

Spring 2010 Graduate Student Survey Results by Degree Appendix C: p. 1 of 30

Spring 2010 Graduate Student Survey Results by Degree – Appendix C

Section 2: Overall Experience

Please indicate the extent to which you agree with the following statements. Category N

Strongly Agree Agree Ambivalent Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Overall, I am satisfied with my graduate experience at the UW College of Education

EdD 16 31% 63% 6% 0% 0%

PhD 113 24% 59% 7% 5% 4%

MIT 102 16% 57% 15% 11% 2%

MEd 136 24% 61% 11% 3% 1%

If I could do it over again, I would attend the UW College of Education.

EdD 16 50% 38% 13% 0% 0%

PhD 109 25% 50% 17% 4% 5%

MIT 102 30% 40% 19% 8% 3%

MEd 134 32% 46% 14% 6% 2%



Overall Experience Charts by Year

I am satisfied with my graduate experience at the UW College of Education. (% that selected agree or strongly agree)

If I could do it over again, I would attend the UW College of Education.

(% that selected agree or strongly agree)

86% 83%75%

79%78%82%

76%82%

94%

83%

73%

85%

EdD PhD MIT MEd

2008 2009 2010

81%74%

66%73%

85%

71%75%

79%

88%

75%71%

78%

EdD PhD MIT MEd

2008 2009 2010



How much have the following helped your educational progress at the UW College of Education? Category n

To a Great Extent Somewhat Slightly

Not at All

Not Applicable

My faculty advisor

EdD 16 56% 31% 6% 6% 0%

PhD 112 56% 25% 11% 8% 0%

MIT 103 9% 16% 38% 30% 8%

MEd 136 32% 32% 21% 11% 4%

Mentor other than advisor

EdD 16 38% 19% 19% 13% 13%

PhD 113 35% 42% 6% 8% 9%

MIT 103 26% 30% 24% 6% 14%

MEd 134 30% 25% 17% 13% 15%

Other students

EdD 16 56% 25% 19% 0% 0%

PhD 113 43% 41% 13% 2% 1%

MIT 102 55% 33% 8% 4% 0%

MEd 135 50% 36% 12% 2% 1%

Class or peer discussions

EdD 16 38% 38% 25% 0% 0%

PhD 112 33% 42% 18% 6% 1%

MIT 102 42% 41% 16% 1% 0%

MEd 135 41% 46% 9% 2% 1%

Research or practical experiences

EdD 16 44% 38% 19% 0% 0%

PhD 113 52% 24% 12% 6% 5%

MIT 102 61% 34% 4% 1% 0%

MEd 136 41% 35% 12% 1% 10%

My own commitment

EdD 16 88% 13% 0% 0% 0%

PhD 113 73% 24% 4% 0% 0%

MIT 103 80% 17% 3% 0% 0%

MEd 135 70% 24% 5% 0% 0%

Being in a cohort structured program

EdD 16 31% 0% 6% 6% 56%

PhD 112 13% 18% 13% 13% 44%

MIT 103 52% 32% 12% 4% 0%

MEd 136 25% 17% 6% 11% 41%



How much have the following hindered your educational progress at the UW College of Education? Category n

To a Great Extent Somewhat Slightly

Not at All

Not Applicable

Absent or poor advising

EdD 16 0% 19% 19% 50% 13%

PhD 110 15% 20% 13% 44% 9%

MIT 103 7% 23% 25% 37% 8%

MEd 135 6% 23% 21% 41% 9%

Lack of funding

EdD 16 19% 25% 13% 25% 19%

PhD 112 21% 22% 14% 26% 17%

MIT 98 6% 21% 16% 44% 12%

MEd 136 18% 22% 23% 24% 13%

Unclear or confusing program requirements

EdD 16 6% 38% 38% 13% 6%

PhD 111 13% 27% 35% 25% 0%

MIT 103 35% 28% 32% 5% 0%

MEd 135 8% 26% 32% 31% 3%

Lack of available and/or relevant classes

EdD 16 6% 13% 25% 50% 6%

PhD 112 6% 46% 26% 21% 1%

MIT 103 5% 17% 17% 48% 14%

MEd 134 13% 27% 25% 31% 3%

Personal issues (parenting, working, lack of time, etc.)

EdD 16 19% 38% 13% 31% 0%

PhD 112 10% 25% 32% 28% 5%

MIT 103 13% 23% 32% 30% 2%

MEd 135 10% 25% 33% 26% 7%

Feeling disconnected from peers, faculty, or staff

EdD 16 6% 44% 13% 25% 13%

PhD 112 15% 23% 36% 26% 0%

MIT 102 6% 23% 30% 39% 2%

MEd 135 10% 22% 38% 27% 3%

Poor instruction

EdD 16 0% 6% 13% 81% 0%

PhD 111 5% 19% 27% 47% 2%

MIT 103 3% 16% 50% 30% 2%

MEd 136 3% 12% 29% 52% 4%



Avg. Extent of perceived help in educational progress: 4 – To a great extent to 1 – Not at all

Avg. Extent of perceived hindrances to educational progress: 4 – To a great extent to 1 – Not at all

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

Faculty advisor

Mentor other than

advisor

Other students

Class / peer discussions

Research / practicum

My own commitment

Being in cohort

program

EdD PhD MIT MEd

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

Absent or poor advising

Lack of funding

Unclear or confusing program

requirements

Lack of available and/or

relevant classes

Personal issues

Feeling disconnected from peers,

faculty, staff

Poor instruction

EdD PhD MIT MEd



Section 3: Advising and Mentoring

a How well supported do you feel by your academic advisor?

69%

19%

13%

0% 0%

54%

23%

12%10%

1%

18% 19%24% 26%

12%

27%

34%

18% 17%

4%

Very Well Supported

Somewhat Well Supported

Slightly Well Supported

Not Well Supported

Don't know who advisor is

EdD PhD MIT MEd



Thinking about your faculty advisor, please indicate the extent to which you agree with the following statements. Category N


Strongly Disagree

I receive ongoing, constructive feedback on my progress from my advisor.

EdD 16 38% 44% 13% 6% 0%

PhD 112 34% 29% 18% 14% 4%

MIT 91 7% 11% 23% 32% 27%

MEd 128 16% 28% 25% 24% 6%

I spend a sufficient amount of time with my advisor.

EdD 16 13% 50% 25% 13% 0%

PhD 112 29% 33% 15% 15% 7%

MIT 91 4% 15% 29% 29% 23%

MEd 128 9% 25% 28% 32% 5%

My advisor is responsive.

EdD 16 69% 25% 0% 6% 0%

PhD 112 46% 29% 13% 8% 3%

MIT 89 21% 36% 24% 11% 8%

MEd 128 25% 46% 20% 8% 1%

My advisor has actively contributed to my academic and intellectual development.

EdD 16 44% 31% 19% 6% 0%

PhD 112 49% 34% 10% 4% 4%

MIT 90 11% 21% 24% 28% 16%

MEd 128 23% 29% 25% 16% 6%

My advisor understands my career goals.

EdD 16 44% 38% 19% 0% 0%

PhD 110 33% 41% 15% 10% 2%

MIT 90 18% 30% 18% 19% 16%

MEd 129 18% 43% 21% 16% 2%

My advisor is the primary person I look to for academic advice and guidance.

EdD 16 31% 50% 6% 6% 6%

PhD 112 39% 29% 10% 15% 7%

MIT 90 3% 11% 14% 37% 34%

MEd 129 20% 26% 13% 33% 8%



Thinking about your faculty advisor, please indicate the extent to which you agree with the following statements. Category N


Strongly Disagree

I would know which person or office to turn to for help in resolving any conflicts with my advisor

EdD 16 31% 25% 13% 19% 13%

PhD 111 23% 31% 22% 22% 4%

MIT 91 8% 18% 30% 23% 22%

MEd 128 4% 30% 16% 38% 13%

My advisor is too busy and has little time for me.

EdD 16 0% 6% 0% 56% 38%

PhD 111 9% 14% 16% 35% 25%

MIT 91 8% 8% 36% 32% 16%

MEd 129 14% 18% 26% 26% 16%



Avg. Agreement with advising statements: 5 – Strongly Agree to 1 – Strongly Disagree

Faculty Advising Charts by Year

EdD (% that selected agree or strongly agree)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

receive feedback on

progress

sufficient time with advisor

advisor is responsive

advisor has contributed to development

advisor understands career goals

advisor is primary

person I look

to

know who to turn to for

advising

conflict help

advisor is too busy

EdD PhD MIT MEd

67%

48%

83% 83%77%

63%

52%

81%

63%

94%

75%81% 81%

56%

I receive feedback on my progress

I spend sufficient

advisor time


advisor actively

contribute to

development


advisor primary

person for

guidance

know who to ask for help in resolving

advisor conflicts

2009 2010



PhD (% that selected agree or strongly agree)

MIT (% that selected agree or strongly agree)

64%58%

75% 76% 74%

64%

46%

63% 63%

76%83%

74%68%

53%


I spend sufficient

advisor time


advisor actively

contribute to

development


advisor primary

person for

guidance


advisor conflicts

2009 2010

13%

30%

53%

40%

48%

25%

33%

18% 20%

57%

32%

48%

14%

25%


I spend sufficient

advisor time


advisor actively

contribute to

development


advisor primary

person for

guidance


advisor conflicts

2009 2010



MEd (% that selected agree or strongly agree)

53%49%

77%

66% 68%

58%

41%45%

34%

71%

52%60%

46%

34%


I spend sufficient

advisor time


advisor actively

contribute to

development


advisor primary

person for

guidance


advisor conflicts

2009 2010



Please indicate the extent to which you rely on sources other than your faculty advisor for advising and/or mentoring. Category N A lot Some A little

Not at all

Another faculty member

EdD 16 19% 38% 19% 25%

PhD 113 20% 58% 16% 6%

MIT 103 41% 40% 17% 3%

MEd 133 17% 37% 29% 17%

Area staff (where Area is C&I, EdPsy, SpEd, etc.)

EdD 16 6% 31% 25% 38%

PhD 113 14% 48% 25% 13%

MIT 103 17% 30% 19% 34%

MEd 134 13% 26% 28% 33%

The Office of Student Services

EdD 16 31% 19% 6% 44%

PhD 113 4% 25% 39% 32%

MIT 102 1% 15% 27% 57%

MEd 134 2% 17% 25% 56%

The Office of Minority Recruitment and Retention

EdD 16 6% 0% 0% 94%

PhD 112 3% 6% 15% 76%

MIT 103 0% 3% 3% 94%

MEd 130 6% 5% 5% 84%

Other graduate students

EdD 16 31% 50% 13% 6%

PhD 112 43% 38% 18% 2%

MIT 103 61% 21% 13% 5%

MEd 133 53% 33% 10% 4%

The College website

EdD 16 38% 31% 13% 19%

PhD 113 15% 36% 36% 12%

MIT 103 6% 25% 39% 30%

MEd 133 20% 40% 23% 17%

The Graduate School

EdD 16 6% 31% 25% 38%

PhD 112 2% 14% 29% 54%

MIT 103 4% 10% 21% 65%

MEd 133 2% 17% 23% 59%



Avg. Extent of reliance on sources other than faculty advisor: 4 – A lot to 1 – Not at all

Other Sources Reliance Charts by Year

EdD (% that selected a lot or some)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

Another faculty

member

Area staff The Office of Student Services

OMRR Other graduate students

The College website

The Graduate

School

EdD PhD MIT MEd

58%

44%

26%22%

70% 70%

26%

56%

38%

50%

6%

81%

69%

38%

Another faculty

member



The College website

The Graduate

School

2009 2010



PhD (% that selected a lot or some)

MIT (% that selected a lot or some)

77%

45%

35%

6%

82%

48%

11%

78%

62%

29%

9%

80%

51%

16%

Another faculty

member



The College website

The Graduate

School

2009 2010

64%

38%

18%

2%

84%

31%

10%

81%

47%

16%

3%

83%

31%

14%

Another faculty

member



The College website

The Graduate

School

2009 2010



MEd (% that selected a lot or some)

56%

43%

23%

13%

84%

61%

15%

54%

39%

19%11%

86%

59%

19%

Another faculty

member



The College website

The Graduate

School

2009 2010



Section 4: Professional Development

Which of the following best describe(s) the setting in which you hope to work immediately after you complete your degree? (Check all that apply).

Category EdD PhD MIT MEd

N 16 112 103 136

Public P-12 system 19% 4% 70% 29%

Public higher education system 75% 54% 6% 29%

Other governmental institution 13% 13% 0% 7%

Private P-12 institution 0% 5% 23% 13%

Private higher education institution 6% 28% 5% 9%

Nonprofit organization or foundation 19% 29% 3% 24%

Industry or business 0% 7% 1% 3%

Self-employed, private practice, or consultant 13% 14% 2% 9%

Clinical setting (hospital, clinic, etc.) 6% 8% 0% 4%

Not sure 0% 14% 4% 5%

Other 0% 5% 0% 6%

Which of the following best describe(s) the primary type of work you hope to do immediately after you complete your degree? (Check all that apply).


N 16 112 101 135

Teacher (P-12) 6% 4% 97% 39%

School Psychologist 0% 4% 0% 9%

Faculty (higher education) 38% 49% 2% 9%

Education specialist 19% 26% 2% 24%

Administrator or manager 63% 13% 0% 24%

Researcher 13% 46% 2% 12%

Policy Analyst 6% 6% 0% 7%

Clinician 0% 5% 1% 3%

Not sure 0% 11% 4% 4%

Other 13% 7% 0% 12%



Eighty-five survey takers indicated that they will graduate spring or summer of 2010. These 85 respondents were

asked additional questions about their future plans.

Do you have a job lined up for the type of work you are hoping to do?


N 2 12 18 51

I have a couple leads 0% 8% 6% 20%

I have had or currently have interviews 0% 17% 11% 12%

Not yet 0% 33% 44% 37%

Yes - already working in position I want 100% 0% 39% 14%

Yes - I have a position lined up 0% 42% 0% 18%

Thinking about your preferred setting and type of work, please indicate the extent to which you feel each of the following is preparing you for this work. Category N A lot Some A little

Not at all

Not applicable

Courses within the College of Education.

EdD 16 75% 19% 6% 0% 0%

PhD 112 38% 45% 14% 4% 0%

MIT 103 59% 35% 6% 0% 0%

MEd 133 53% 39% 6% 2% 1%

Courses in other UW schools/departments.

EdD 16 13% 31% 6% 13% 38%

PhD 110 23% 37% 21% 6% 13%

MIT 103 17% 26% 23% 5% 29%

MEd 132 16% 24% 12% 11% 36%

Program requirements (e.g., R&I, Capstone Project, Portfolio, etc.).

EdD 16 50% 19% 13% 6% 13%

PhD 110 16% 48% 23% 9% 4%

MIT 103 19% 44% 23% 7% 7%

MEd 133 25% 29% 23% 8% 15%

Research-oriented internships/experiences.

EdD 16 31% 19% 0% 6% 44%

PhD 111 52% 16% 10% 3% 19%

MIT 103 21% 30% 11% 7% 31%

MEd 132 20% 14% 10% 11% 45%

Practice-oriented internships/experiences.

EdD 15 60% 27% 0% 7% 7%

PhD 111 39% 14% 8% 3% 36%

MIT 103 78% 13% 8% 0% 2%

MEd 130 45% 22% 5% 3% 25%

College events you have attended (lectures, workshops, etc.).

EdD 16 13% 25% 25% 13% 25%

PhD 110 7% 37% 34% 14% 8%

MIT 102 4% 30% 27% 16% 23%

MEd 132 10% 25% 21% 11% 33%



Thinking about your preferred setting and type of work, please indicate the extent to which you feel each of the following is preparing you for this work. Category N A lot Some A little

Not at all

Not applicable

Mentoring by faculty.

EdD 16 38% 44% 0% 6% 13%

PhD 112 42% 34% 18% 5% 1%

MIT 103 23% 29% 30% 10% 8%

MEd 132 23% 33% 27% 11% 7%

Mentoring by community professionals.

EdD 16 31% 31% 13% 19% 6%

PhD 111 12% 27% 15% 8% 38%

MIT 103 33% 25% 19% 8% 15%

MEd 133 29% 25% 17% 5% 24%

Avg. Extent of preparation: 4 – A lot to 1 – Not at all

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

Courses within COE

Courses in other UW

depts

Program requirements

Research experiences

Practice experiences

College events

Mentoring by faculty

Mentoring by community

professionals

EdD PhD MIT MEd



Preparation Help Charts by Year

EdD Please indicate the extent to which you feel the following is preparing you for work in your preferred setting.

(% that selected a lot or some)

PhD Please indicate the extent to which you feel the following is preparing you for work in your preferred setting.


96%

58%

81%

58%

74%

30%

94%

44%

69%

50%

87%

38%

Courses within COE

Courses in other UW

depts




College events

2009 2010

88%

55%

69%76%

52%

41%

82%

60%65% 68%

53%45%

Courses within COE

Courses in other UW

depts




College events

2009 2010



MIT Please indicate the extent to which you feel the following is preparing you for work in your preferred setting.


MEd Please indicate the extent to which you feel the following is preparing you for work in your preferred setting.


92%

36%

47%39%

77%

19%

94%

43%

63%

51%

90%

34%

Courses within COE

Courses in other UW

depts




College events

2009 2010

94%

55%

69%

45%

65%

41%

92%

40%

53%

34%

67%

35%

Courses within COE

Courses in other UW

depts




College events

2009 2010



Section 5: Climate

Below are pairs of words people often use to describe the overall climate of a organization. Considering each word to be opposite ends of the same scale, where would you rate the UW College of Education? Category N 1 2 3 4 5 6

No Opinion

Friendly (1) to Hostile (6)

EdD 16 50% 25% 19% 6% 0% 0% 0%

PhD 113 29% 42% 17% 11% 1% 1% 0%

MIT 103 31% 52% 10% 2% 3% 0% 2%

MEd 130 33% 47% 14% 4% 1% 0% 2%

Concerned (1) to Indifferent (6)

EdD 16 25% 31% 25% 6% 6% 6% 0%

PhD 112 15% 33% 33% 7% 7% 4% 1%

MIT 102 28% 34% 25% 9% 2% 1% 1%

MEd 130 19% 31% 26% 12% 5% 1% 5%

Non-competitive (1) to Competitive (6)

EdD 16 13% 38% 19% 6% 0% 13% 13%

PhD 113 16% 25% 22% 20% 10% 4% 4%

MIT 103 23% 26% 17% 17% 8% 1% 7%

MEd 130 17% 28% 24% 14% 6% 2% 8%

Supportive (1) to Unsupportive (6)

EdD 16 25% 38% 25% 6% 6% 0% 0%

PhD 113 22% 42% 22% 5% 5% 4% 0%

MIT 103 24% 37% 23% 8% 4% 2% 2%

MEd 130 24% 35% 25% 12% 3% 0% 1%

Respectful (1) to Disrespectful (6)

EdD 16 31% 44% 13% 13% 0% 0% 0%

PhD 113 35% 42% 10% 4% 4% 3% 2%

MIT 103 37% 32% 21% 4% 5% 0% 1%

MEd 130 44% 36% 13% 2% 1% 0% 4%

Anti-racist (1) to Racist (6)

EdD 15 27% 33% 0% 7% 13% 0% 20%

PhD 112 29% 26% 16% 8% 5% 3% 13%

MIT 103 59% 18% 11% 2% 2% 0% 8%

MEd 131 42% 29% 11% 2% 2% 1% 13%



Below are pairs of words people often use to describe the overall climate of a organization. Considering each word to be opposite ends of the same scale, where would you rate the UW College of Education? Category N 1 2 3 4 5 6

No Opinion

Non-sexist (1) to Sexist (6)

EdD 16 31% 38% 6% 6% 6% 0% 13%

PhD 113 32% 33% 11% 11% 6% 0% 8%

MIT 103 63% 17% 9% 2% 1% 0% 8%

MEd 131 43% 31% 8% 5% 2% 1% 11%

Queer-friendly (1) to Homophobic (6)

EdD 16 38% 13% 0% 6% 0% 0% 44%

PhD 113 28% 32% 10% 5% 3% 4% 19%

MIT 103 56% 19% 8% 1% 2% 1% 13%

MEd 130 28% 28% 9% 3% 0% 2% 31%

Disability-friendly (1) to Unaccommodating (6)

EdD 16 31% 19% 0% 6% 0% 0% 44%

PhD 112 20% 29% 10% 7% 5% 4% 24%

MIT 103 50% 17% 8% 3% 2% 1% 19%

MEd 131 27% 22% 11% 2% 1% 2% 35%



Avg. Climate Chart by Degree (Avg Score: 1-positive to 6-negative)

Climate Charts by Year

EdD (Avg Climate Score: 1-positive to 6-negative)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

EdD PhD MIT MEd

1.92.1

2.6

1.9 1.92.1 2.0

2.3 2.3

1.8

2.62.8

2.32.1

2.32.1

1.6 1.7

2009 2010



PhD (Avg Climate Score: 1-positive to 6-negative)

MIT (Avg Climate Score: 1-positive to 6-negative)

2.1

2.73.1

2.52.1

2.4 2.3 2.42.7

2.2

2.72.9

2.42.1

2.3 2.2 2.22.5

2009 2010

1.8

2.32.6

2.2

1.81.6 1.5

1.61.81.9

2.2

2.62.3

2.1

1.6 1.5 1.6 1.7

2009 2010



MEd (Avg Climate Score: 1-positive to 6-negative)

1.9

2.4

3.2

2.3

1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.91.9

2.5 2.72.3

1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.0

2009 2010



Have you observed or personally experienced prejudice/discrimination within the College of Education based on: Category N Observed

Personally Experienced

Observed and

Experienced Neither

Gender

EdD 16 6% 6% 0% 88%

PhD 112 17% 13% 4% 75%

MIT 103 10% 2% 1% 89%

MEd 130 6% 3% 0% 91%

Race or ethnicity

EdD 16 19% 19% 6% 69%

PhD 110 25% 17% 7% 65%

MIT 103 9% 10% 3% 84%

MEd 129 13% 4% 2% 85%

Country of origin

EdD 16 0% 0% 0% 100%

PhD 109 17% 6% 1% 77%

MIT 103 4% 1% 1% 96%

MEd 129 9% 2% 1% 90%

Religion

EdD 16 0% 0% 0% 100%

PhD 109 12% 5% 1% 84%

MIT 101 12% 6% 3% 85%

MEd 129 8% 2% 0% 91%

Sexual orientation

EdD 16 6% 0% 0% 94%

PhD 111 9% 2% 1% 90%

MIT 102 7% 0% 0% 93%

MEd 128 4% 2% 0% 95%

Disability

EdD 15 0% 0% 0% 100%

PhD 111 12% 1% 0% 87%

MIT 103 5% 0% 0% 95%

MEd 129 2% 0% 0% 98%

Age

EdD 16 0% 0% 0% 100%

PhD 112 14% 6% 2% 81%

MIT 103 11% 5% 1% 85%

MEd 129 4% 5% 1% 92%

Social economic status

EdD 16 6% 0% 0% 94%

PhD 111 12% 5% 3% 86%

MIT 102 5% 1% 1% 95%

MEd 129 4% 4% 2% 94%

Political ideology

EdD 16 25% 0% 0% 75%

PhD 112 21% 10% 4% 74%

MIT 102 15% 8% 2% 79%

MEd 129 15% 5% 1% 81%



Observed/Experienced Discrimination by Degree (% observed or experienced discrimination)

Observed/Experienced Discrimination Charts by Year

EdD (% observed or experienced discrimination)

PhD

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

EdD PhD MIT MEd

19%22%

19%

11%15% 15% 15%

8%

19%

13%

31%

0% 0%

6%

0% 0%

6%

25%

2009 2010



(% observed or experienced discrimination)

MIT (% observed or experienced discrimination)

30%

39%

27%

19%15%

20% 19% 19%

41%

25%

35%

23%

16%

10%13%

19%

14%

26%

2009 2010

2%

10%

2% 2%

5% 5%

13%

3%

13%11%

16%

4%

15%

7%5%

15%

5%

21%

2009 2010



MEd (% observed or experienced discrimination)

If you have observed any prejudice/discrimination in the College, please indicate the context in which it occurred (check

all that apply):


Total (respondents) 6 63 37 47

Institutional 50% 38% 19% 26%

Instruction (materials, class discussion, etc.) 67% 48% 38% 43%

Student-faculty/staff interaction(s) 50% 57% 54% 40%

Student-student interaction(s) 67% 52% 65% 60%

Other 0% 5% 11% 4%

If you have personally experienced any prejudice/discrimination in the College, please indicate the context in which it

occurred (check all that apply):


Total (respondents) 4 42 21 22

Institutional 50% 24% 10% 27%

Instruction (materials, class discussion, etc.) 50% 33% 38% 36%

Student-faculty/staff interaction(s) 50% 60% 57% 41%

Student-student interaction(s) 25% 55% 48% 59%

Other 0% 5% 10% 14%

13%

24%

14%11%

3%5%

13%

8%

17%

9%

15%

10% 9%

5%

2%

8%6%

19%

2009 2010



Please indicate the extent to which you agree with the following statements. Category N


Strongly Disagree

I feel a sense of belonging to the UW College of Education community.

EdD 27 13% 31% 44% 6% 6%

PhD 109 18% 39% 27% 13% 4%

MIT 62 15% 50% 21% 13% 2%

MEd 94 11% 48% 25% 12% 4%

The College actively recruits graduate students from underrepresented groups.

EdD 27 19% 44% 31% 0% 6%

PhD 109 20% 32% 36% 8% 4%

MIT 62 0% 24% 55% 17% 3%

MEd 93 12% 31% 53% 4% 0%

Diversity is good for the College and should be actively promoted by students,staff, faculty, and administrators.

EdD 27 81% 13% 6% 0% 0%

PhD 109 72% 21% 6% 0% 0%

MIT 62 53% 34% 13% 0% 0%

MEd 94 65% 26% 8% 1% 0%

Avg. Agreement with climate statements: 5 – Strongly Agree to 1 – Strongly Disagree

3.43.7

4.8

3.6 3.6

4.7

3.6

3.0

4.4

3.5 3.5

4.6

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

Feel sense of belonging Recruits from underrep. Groups

Diversity is good for COE

EdD PhD MIT MEd

spring 2010 graduate student survey results by degree ...€¦ · spring 2010 graduate student...

Documents