spring 2016 course evaluation - results
TRANSCRIPT
Section: A
Class Number: 17102
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 1032: CHEMISTRY, THE CENTRAL SCIENCE
Response Rate: 24/30Primary Instructor: Ulman,Abraham
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 95.8% 4.2% 24
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 4.2% 91.7% 4.2% 24
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 95.8% 5.0 4.2% 24
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 79.2% 8.3% 4.7 12.5% 24
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 66.7% 8.3% 25.0% 4.5 24
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 58.3% 8.3% 25.0% 4.4 8.3% 24
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 75.0% 4.2% 4.2% 4.6 16.7% 24
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 56.5% 4.3% 4.3% 34.8% 4.1 23
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 62.5% 8.3% 4.5 29.2% 24
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 62.5% 4.2% 4.2% 4.5 29.2% 24
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 70.8% 8.3% 4.6 20.8% 24
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 54.2% 4.2% 20.8% 4.3 20.8% 24
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16280
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 8073: Organic Spectroscopy
Response Rate: 14/14Primary Instructor: Ulman,Abraham
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 14.3% 85.7% 14
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 7.7% 92.3% 13
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.7% 7.1% 4.7 7.1% 14
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 64.3% 14.3% 4.5 21.4% 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 7.1% 35.7% 21.4% 3.9 35.7% 14
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 14.3% 4.2 35.7% 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 35.7% 21.4% 7.1% 3.9 35.7% 14
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 7.1% 35.7% 35.7% 3.8 21.4% 14
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 7.1% 28.6% 14.3% 3.9 50.0% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 7.1% 4.4 42.9% 14
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 64.3% 14.3% 4.5 21.4% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 57.1% 7.1% 4.5 35.7% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 22247
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 3313: Introduction to Transportation Systems
Response Rate: 13/20Primary Instructor: Sanchez,Luis
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 13
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 13
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 84.6% 4.8 15.4% 13
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 61.5% 7.7% 4.5 30.8% 13
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 76.9% 4.8 23.1% 13
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 84.6% 4.8 15.4% 13
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 69.2% 4.7 30.8% 13
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 7.7% 69.2% 4.5 23.1% 13
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I understand the fundamental conceptual elements of transportation systems. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 12
Q28 I can describe the approach used to analyze and design transportation systems. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 12
Q29 I understand the context within which transportation systems operate and a
characterization of their behavior.
75.0% 4.8 25.0% 12
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 61.5% 7.7% 7.7% 4.4 23.1% 13
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 69.2% 4.7 30.8% 13
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 76.9% 4.8 23.1% 13
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 46.2% 7.7% 4.4 46.2% 13
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: EXEC
Class Number: 23274
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 8703: Managing and Leading in the 21st Century
Response Rate: 14/15Primary Instructor: Di Bernardo,Albert
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 14
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 14
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 14
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 14
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 78.6% 7.1% 7.1% 4.8 7.1% 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 14
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 14
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 85.7% 7.1% 4.8 7.1% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 14
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16231
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 5303: INTRODUCTION TO PROGRAMMING AND PROBLEM SOLVING
Response Rate: 6/12Primary Instructor: Ozkan,Ozgur
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 83.3% 16.7% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 83.3% 16.7% 6
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 33.3% 33.3% 16.7% 3.5 16.7% 6
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 66.7% 16.7% 16.7% 4.2 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 33.3% 16.7% 4.0 50.0% 6
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 33.3% 3.8 16.7% 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 33.3% 33.3% 16.7% 3.0 16.7% 6
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 16.7% 33.3% 33.3% 3.2 16.7% 6
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 50.0% 33.3% 16.7% 2.5 6
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 50.0% 33.3% 16.7% 2.5 6
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
16.7% 33.3% 16.7% 3.8 33.3% 6
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 16.7% 33.3% 16.7% 16.7% 3.4 16.7% 6
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
33.3% 33.3% 16.7% 3.0 16.7% 6
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 16.7% 33.3% 3.8 50.0% 6
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 33.3% 66.7% 3.7 6
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 16.7% 50.0% 3.7 33.3% 6
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 33.3% 50.0% 3.8 16.7% 6
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 16.7% 16.7% 66.7% 3.2 6
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 33.3% 33.3% 16.7% 16.7% 2.8 6
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 16.7% 33.3% 16.7% 33.3% 3.2 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 16.7% 2.2 33.3% 6
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 16.7% 33.3% 3.8 50.0% 6
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 16.7% 16.7% 33.3% 16.7% 2.8 16.7% 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 33.3% 33.3% 16.7% 3.0 16.7% 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16535
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6003: Foundations of Computer Science
Response Rate: 22/33Primary Instructor: Ozkan,Ozgur
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 4.5% 95.5% 22
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 4.5% 95.5% 22
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 4.5% 50.0% 13.6% 4.2 31.8% 22
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 4.5% 54.5% 4.5% 27.3% 4.0 9.1% 22
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 9.5% 57.1% 4.8% 14.3% 4.0 14.3% 21
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 76.2% 9.5% 4.8% 4.5 9.5% 21
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 57.1% 4.8% 4.8% 9.5% 4.4 23.8% 21
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 47.6% 19.0% 4.3 33.3% 21
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 9.1% 50.0% 22.7% 4.0 18.2% 22
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 4.5% 59.1% 9.1% 13.6% 4.1 13.6% 22
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
4.5% 50.0% 4.5% 13.6% 4.1 27.3% 22
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 4.5% 40.9% 13.6% 13.6% 3.9 27.3% 22
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
9.1% 63.6% 4.5% 4.5% 4.2 18.2% 22
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 9.1% 54.5% 18.2% 4.1 18.2% 22
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 9.1% 54.5% 9.1% 4.2 27.3% 22
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 4.5% 50.0% 22.7% 4.1 22.7% 22
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 4.5% 45.5% 31.8% 4.0 18.2% 22
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 9.1% 54.5% 22.7% 4.0 13.6% 22
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 9.1% 45.5% 9.1% 4.1 36.4% 22
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 4.5% 40.9% 4.5% 31.8% 3.9 18.2% 22
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 9.1% 45.5% 13.6% 4.5% 3.9 27.3% 22
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.5% 50.0% 4.5% 13.6% 4.1 27.3% 22
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 9.1% 50.0% 4.5% 9.1% 4.0 27.3% 22
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.5% 54.5% 4.5% 9.1% 4.2 27.3% 22
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: ALEC
Class Number: 17176
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 3114: Fundamentals of Electronics I
Response Rate: 22/31Primary Instructor: Knox,Michael E.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 22
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 4.5% 90.9% 4.5% 22
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 86.4% 4.5% 4.8 9.1% 22
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 86.4% 4.5% 4.8 9.1% 22
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 54.5% 13.6% 4.5% 4.2 27.3% 22
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 63.6% 4.5% 4.5 31.8% 22
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 72.7% 4.5% 4.7 22.7% 22
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 72.7% 4.5% 4.5% 4.6 18.2% 22
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 72.7% 4.5% 4.6 22.7% 22
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 81.8% 4.5% 4.5% 4.7 9.1% 22
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 86.4% 4.5% 4.8 9.1% 22
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 77.3% 4.8 22.7% 22
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 8
13-February-2017
Section: B2LB
Class Number: 17385
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 3114: Fundamentals of Electronics I
Response Rate: 1/14Primary Instructor: Knox,Michael E.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
4.0 100.0% 1
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 100.0% 5.0 1
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 1
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 1
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 1
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 1
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 1
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 8
13-February-2017
Section: A1LB
Class Number: 17272
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 3124: Fundamentals of Electronics II
Response Rate: 6/5Primary Instructor: Knox,Michael E.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
100.0% 5.0 6
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 100.0% 5.0 6
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 6
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 8
13-February-2017
Section: A2LB
Class Number: 17273
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 3124: Fundamentals of Electronics II
Response Rate: 6/5Primary Instructor: Knox,Michael E.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 6
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 83.3% 16.7% 5.0 6
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 66.7% 16.7% 4.8 16.7% 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 16.7% 16.7% 4.2 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 66.7% 16.7% 4.8 16.7% 6
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q40 Value was added to my education. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 66.7% 16.7% 4.5 16.7% 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 8
13-February-2017
Section: B1LB
Class Number: 17274
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 3124: Fundamentals of Electronics II
Response Rate: 11/11Primary Instructor: Knox,Michael E.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 72.7% 9.1% 4.6 18.2% 11
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
Q40 Value was added to my education. 90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 5 of 8
13-February-2017
Section: B2LB
Class Number: 17275
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 3124: Fundamentals of Electronics II
Response Rate: 3/3Primary Instructor: Knox,Michael E.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
33.3% 33.3% 3.7 33.3% 3
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 33.3% 33.3% 3.3 33.3% 3
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 66.7% 33.3% 4.0 3
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 33.3% 66.7% 3.7 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 33.3% 33.3% 3.3 33.3% 3
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 33.3% 33.3% 3.7 33.3% 3
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 33.3% 33.3% 3.3 33.3% 3
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 33.3% 4.0 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 33.3% 3.7 33.3% 3
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 33.3% 66.7% 3.7 3
Q40 Value was added to my education. 33.3% 66.7% 3.7 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 33.3% 66.7% 3.7 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 6 of 8
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17278
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 3124: Fundamentals of Electronics II
Response Rate: 33/45Primary Instructor: Knox,Michael E.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 3.0% 97.0% 33
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 3.0% 97.0% 33
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 3.0% 90.9% 4.8 6.1% 33
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 3.0% 84.8% 4.8 12.1% 33
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 3.0% 72.7% 3.0% 6.1% 4.5 15.2% 33
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 3.0% 81.8% 3.0% 4.8 12.1% 33
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 81.8% 3.0% 4.8 15.2% 33
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 3.0% 69.7% 6.1% 4.5 21.2% 33
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 60.6% 9.1% 4.5 30.3% 33
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 81.8% 3.0% 4.8 15.2% 33
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 3.0% 84.8% 4.8 12.1% 33
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 75.8% 6.1% 3.0% 4.6 15.2% 33
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 7 of 8
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17729
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 4283: Wireless Information Systems Laboratory II
Response Rate: 15/17Primary Instructor: Knox,Michael E.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 15
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 15
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 86.7% 4.9 13.3% 15
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 73.3% 6.7% 4.6 20.0% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 73.3% 4.7 26.7% 15
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 73.3% 6.7% 13.3% 4.6 6.7% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 86.7% 4.9 13.3% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 93.3% 4.9 6.7% 15
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 93.3% 4.9 6.7% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 8 of 8
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16240
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6373: Programming Languages
Response Rate: 31/47Primary Instructor: Viega,John Timothy
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 9.7% 90.3% 31
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 29
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 9.7% 38.7% 9.7% 6.5% 3.8 35.5% 31
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 12.9% 35.5% 12.9% 9.7% 3.6 29.0% 31
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 25.8% 16.1% 22.6% 16.1% 2.8 19.4% 31
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 12.9% 25.8% 29.0% 9.7% 3.2 22.6% 31
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 25.8% 22.6% 9.7% 3.3 41.9% 31
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 19.4% 16.1% 16.1% 19.4% 3.1 29.0% 31
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 22.6% 19.4% 25.8% 6.5% 2.9 25.8% 31
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 22.6% 32.3% 12.9% 3.2% 3.4 29.0% 31
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 29.0% 19.4% 19.4% 3.2% 2.9 29.0% 31
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 25.8% 22.6% 25.8% 6.5% 2.9 19.4% 31
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I1
Class Number: 16588
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6831: COMPUTATIONAL FINANCE LABORATORY
Response Rate: 9/9Primary Instructor: Rubinraut,Moise
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
55.6% 11.1% 11.1% 4.2 22.2% 9
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 11.1% 55.6% 33.3% 3.9 9
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 66.7% 11.1% 4.6 22.2% 9
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 66.7% 22.2% 4.4 11.1% 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 66.7% 22.2% 4.4 11.1% 9
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 11.1% 66.7% 22.2% 3.9 9
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 55.6% 4.6 44.4% 9
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 55.6% 11.1% 4.4 33.3% 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 66.7% 11.1% 4.4 22.2% 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 44.4% 11.1% 4.3 44.4% 9
Q40 Value was added to my education. 44.4% 4.4 55.6% 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 55.6% 11.1% 4.4 33.3% 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 24659
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 6033: SELECTED TOPICS IN STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS I
Response Rate: 7/9Primary Instructor: Petrov,Georgi Ivanov
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 7
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 14.3% 85.7% 7
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 57.1% 4.6 42.9% 7
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 42.9% 4.4 57.1% 7
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 14.3% 42.9% 4.0 42.9% 7
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 14.3% 28.6% 28.6% 3.6 28.6% 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 42.9% 14.3% 4.3 42.9% 7
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 28.6% 4.3 71.4% 7
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 14.3% 57.1% 4.1 28.6% 7
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17508
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
PL 3254W: PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Response Rate: 15/20Primary Instructor: Stein,Jordan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 15
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 66.7% 6.7% 4.5 26.7% 15
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 60.0% 6.7% 4.5 33.3% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 73.3% 4.7 26.7% 15
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 66.7% 6.7% 4.6 26.7% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 53.3% 6.7% 4.4 40.0% 15
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 53.3% 13.3% 4.4 33.3% 15
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have enhanced my ability to understand and demonstrate the relationship
between content of scientific and technological knowledge, and the social and
intellectual context in which it is created.
46.7% 6.7% 4.4 46.7% 15
Q28 I have enhanced my ability to understand and demonstrate how social processes
frame scientific and technological enterprises, including theory construction,
invention, and innovation.
33.3% 6.7% 4.3 60.0% 15
Q29 I have enhanced my ability to understand and demonstrate how science and
technology shape society (in historical, philosophical, sociological, cultural and
technical ways).
53.3% 6.7% 4.5 40.0% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 13.3% 4.2 53.3% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 60.0% 13.3% 4.5 26.7% 15
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 46.7% 13.3% 13.3% 4.1 26.7% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 40.0% 20.0% 13.3% 3.9 26.7% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A2LC
Class Number: 1299
Dept. of General Engineering
EG 1003: Introduction to Engineering and Design
Response Rate: 139/216Primary Instructor: Georgi,Gunter W
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 0.7% 96.4% 2.9% 138
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 9.7% 89.6% 0.7% 134
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 59.6% 0.7% 4.4% 4.4% 4.5 30.9% 136
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 48.2% 2.9% 6.6% 16.1% 4.2 26.3% 137
B. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 44.2% 0.8% 5.4% 9.3% 4.2 40.3% 129
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 7.3% 28.5% 0.7% 12.4% 10.2% 3.7 40.9% 137
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 5.8% 22.5% 1.4% 21.0% 14.5% 3.5 34.8% 138
D1. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 2.2% 32.6% 0.7% 8.7% 15.2% 3.9 40.6% 138
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 3.6% 40.6% 1.4% 7.2% 8.7% 4.1 38.4% 138
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 In this course we gain an understanding of the design process. 1.5% 40.8% 5.4% 6.2% 4.2 46.2% 130
Q28 In the course project we gained an understanding of contemporary engineering
practice.
1.5% 43.1% 0.8% 4.6% 13.1% 4.2 36.9% 130
F. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
0.8% 64.6% 5.4% 4.6% 4.5 24.6% 130
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 3.8% 30.0% 0.8% 13.1% 12.3% 3.8 40.0% 130
G1. Course Difficulty:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 1.4% 30.4% 1.4% 8.0% 16.7% 3.9 42.0% 138
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 2.9% 34.1% 1.4% 5.1% 15.2% 4.0 41.3% 138
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 0.7% 39.9% 1.4% 3.6% 17.4% 4.1 37.0% 138
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 6.5% 32.6% 2.2% 7.2% 18.1% 3.8 33.3% 138
P. ABET-As a result of taking this course, I have enhanced my ability to:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A05 I have enhanced my ability to solve engineering problems. 1.5% 30.8% 0.8% 9.2% 16.2% 3.9 41.5% 130
A06 I have enhanced my ability to analyze and interpret data appropriately. 1.5% 33.1% 0.8% 7.7% 19.2% 3.9 37.7% 130
A26 I have enhanced my ability to plan and deliver oral presentations effectively 1.5% 50.0% 1.5% 3.1% 7.7% 4.3 36.2% 130
A27 I have enhanced my ability to plan and deliver written presentation effectively 2.3% 43.1% 0.8% 3.8% 8.5% 4.2 41.5% 130
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
1.5% 39.2% 1.5% 3.1% 12.3% 4.2 42.3% 130
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A2LC
Class Number: 1299
Dept. of General Engineering
EG 1003: Introduction to Engineering and Design
Response Rate: 139/216Primary Instructor: Georgi,Gunter W
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16566
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MN 7893: Production Science
Response Rate: 18/19Primary Instructor: Sathaye,Shashi
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 5.6% 94.4% 18
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 11.1% 83.3% 5.6% 18
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 11.1% 50.0% 5.6% 4.1 33.3% 18
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 11.1% 50.0% 5.6% 11.1% 3.9 22.2% 18
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 11.1% 27.8% 11.1% 5.6% 3.7 44.4% 18
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 38.9% 11.1% 5.6% 4.1 44.4% 18
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 5.6% 44.4% 5.6% 5.6% 4.1 38.9% 18
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 33.3% 5.6% 16.7% 4.1 44.4% 18
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 11.1% 27.8% 5.6% 5.6% 3.8 50.0% 18
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
11.1% 38.9% 5.6% 4.0 44.4% 18
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
11.1% 44.4% 11.1% 3.9 33.3% 18
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
5.6% 55.6% 5.6% 4.3 33.3% 18
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 16.7% 22.2% 3.8 27.8% 18
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 5.6% 38.9% 5.6% 4.2 50.0% 18
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 5.6% 44.4% 11.1% 5.6% 4.0 33.3% 18
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 5.6% 38.9% 16.7% 4.1 38.9% 18
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 17001
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 8263: Construction Cost Estimating
Response Rate: 26/28Primary Instructor: Hossain,Faruque
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 26
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 4.0% 96.0% 25
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.8% 3.8% 4.7 15.4% 26
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 88.5% 7.7% 4.8 3.8% 26
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 3.8% 65.4% 3.8% 11.5% 3.8% 4.3 11.5% 26
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 76.9% 7.7% 4.7 15.4% 26
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 76.9% 3.8% 4.7 19.2% 26
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 76.0% 4.0% 16.0% 4.5 4.0% 25
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 3.8% 80.8% 4.7 15.4% 26
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 80.8% 3.8% 4.8 15.4% 26
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 80.8% 3.8% 3.8% 4.7 11.5% 26
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 88.5% 3.8% 4.8 7.7% 26
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 16199
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6093: ACCOUNTING & FINANCE
Response Rate: 33/34Primary Instructor: Apicella,Francis X
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 33
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 3.1% 96.9% 32
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 72.7% 3.0% 4.7 24.2% 33
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 72.7% 6.1% 4.7 21.2% 33
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 78.8% 12.1% 4.7 9.1% 33
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 72.7% 3.0% 3.0% 4.6 21.2% 33
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 66.7% 3.0% 4.6 30.3% 33
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 75.0% 3.1% 4.7 21.9% 32
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 3.0% 60.6% 6.1% 4.5 30.3% 33
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
3.0% 54.5% 4.5 42.4% 33
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
3.0% 63.6% 3.0% 4.5 30.3% 33
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
3.0% 57.6% 3.0% 4.5 36.4% 33
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 54.5% 4.5 45.5% 33
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 69.7% 3.0% 6.1% 4.7 21.2% 33
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 69.7% 3.0% 4.7 27.3% 33
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 75.8% 3.0% 3.0% 4.8 18.2% 33
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 23881
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BMS 4824: TOPICS IN BIOLOGY
Response Rate: 16/19Primary Instructor: Dura-Bernal,Salvadore
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 16
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 16
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 68.8% 4.7 31.3% 16
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 68.8% 12.5% 4.6 18.8% 16
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 37.5% 18.8% 6.3% 3.9 37.5% 16
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 31.3% 12.5% 6.3% 4.0 50.0% 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 6.3% 25.0% 18.8% 12.5% 3.6 37.5% 16
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 12.5% 12.5% 18.8% 43.8% 2.9 12.5% 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 31.3% 18.8% 25.0% 12.5% 2.6 12.5% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 25.0% 18.8% 6.3% 3.8 50.0% 16
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 25.0% 12.5% 12.5% 3.9 50.0% 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 25.0% 37.5% 25.0% 3.3 12.5% 16
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16819
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BT 6063: Immunology: Concepts, Mechanisms and Applications in Biotechnology
Response Rate: 30/35Primary Instructor: Sumen,Cenk
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 30
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 30
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 30
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 93.3% 4.9 6.7% 30
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 3.3% 46.7% 6.7% 6.7% 4.2 36.7% 30
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 30
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 73.3% 4.7 26.7% 30
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 3.3% 76.7% 4.7 20.0% 30
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 56.7% 16.7% 4.4 26.7% 30
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 30
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 93.3% 4.9 6.7% 30
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 86.7% 4.9 13.3% 30
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: E3
Class Number: 17662
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 2114: Calculus III: Multi-Dimensional Calculus
Response Rate: 1/31Primary Instructor: Yang,Deane
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 1
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 1
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 2.0 1
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 2.0 1
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 2.0 1
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.0 100.0% 1
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
100.0% 2.0 1
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 100.0% 3.0 1
Q29 I need more HW problems. 100.0% 2.0 1
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 2.0 1
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 2.0 1
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.0 100.0% 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17511
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
PL 2004: Symbolic Logic
Response Rate: 17/28Primary Instructor: Bain,Jonathan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 17
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 17
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 94.1% 4.9 5.9% 17
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 88.2% 4.9 11.8% 17
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 94.1% 4.9 5.9% 17
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 94.1% 4.9 5.9% 17
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 82.4% 4.8 17.6% 17
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 70.6% 17.6% 4.5 11.8% 17
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have enhanced my ability to understand and demonstrate the relationship
between content of scientific and technological knowledge, and the social and
intellectual context in which it is created.
43.8% 12.5% 4.3 43.8% 16
Q28 I have enhanced my ability to understand and demonstrate how social processes
frame scientific and technological enterprises, including theory construction,
invention, and innovation.
37.5% 18.8% 4.2 43.8% 16
Q29 I have enhanced my ability to understand and demonstrate how science and
technology shape society (in historical, philosophical, sociological, cultural and
technical ways).
37.5% 18.8% 4.2 43.8% 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 64.7% 11.8% 4.4 23.5% 17
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 70.6% 5.9% 4.6 23.5% 17
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 70.6% 5.9% 4.6 23.5% 17
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 70.6% 5.9% 4.6 23.5% 17
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A20 I have enhanced my ability to acquire and process information from multiple
sources
37.5% 18.8% 4.2 43.8% 16
A21 I have enhanced my ability to learn independently. 52.9% 17.6% 4.4 29.4% 17
A22 I have enhanced my ability to continuously seek to acquire new knowledge 41.2% 17.6% 4.2 41.2% 17
A23 I have enhanced my ability to bring in outside experiences to provide solutions to
problems
47.1% 23.5% 4.2 29.4% 17
A25 I have enhanced my ability to articulate ideas in a clear and concise fashion. 43.8% 25.0% 4.2 31.3% 16
A26 I have enhanced my ability to plan and deliver oral presentations effectively 35.3% 5.9% 35.3% 4.0 23.5% 17
A27 I have enhanced my ability to plan and deliver written presentation effectively 41.2% 5.9% 41.2% 4.0 11.8% 17
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17511
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
PL 2004: Symbolic Logic
Response Rate: 17/28Primary Instructor: Bain,Jonathan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A28 I have enhanced my ability to use technology and graphics to present ideas and
decisions
35.3% 5.9% 41.2% 3.9 17.6% 17
A31 I have enhanced my ability to understand some important contemporary
events/issues
41.2% 35.3% 4.1 23.5% 17
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 47.1% 29.4% 4.2 23.5% 17
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
47.1% 5.9% 35.3% 4.1 11.8% 17
A36 I have learned how to function on multi-disciplinary teams 29.4% 5.9% 41.2% 3.9 23.5% 17
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 41.2% 29.4% 4.1 29.4% 17
A38 I have enhanced my ability to develop an understanding of professional and ethical
responsibility
35.3% 35.3% 4.0 29.4% 17
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 35.3% 35.3% 4.0 29.4% 17
A41 I have enhanced my ability to develop a recognition of the need for, and an ability
to engage in life-long learning
47.1% 35.3% 4.1 17.6% 17
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 41.2% 35.3% 4.1 23.5% 17
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
41.2% 35.3% 4.1 23.5% 17
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 22259
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
PL 2274: Space and Spacetime
Response Rate: 19/29Primary Instructor: Bain,Jonathan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 19
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 19
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 78.9% 4.8 21.1% 19
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 68.4% 5.3% 4.6 26.3% 19
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 78.9% 4.8 21.1% 19
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 84.2% 4.8 15.8% 19
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 73.7% 4.7 26.3% 19
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 84.2% 5.3% 10.5% 4.6 19
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 63.2% 4.6 36.8% 19
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 73.7% 15.8% 4.6 10.5% 19
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 78.9% 5.3% 4.7 15.8% 19
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 73.7% 5.3% 5.3% 4.7 15.8% 19
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: MOT
Class Number: 21573
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 9753: SELECTED TOPICS IN MANAGEMENT
Response Rate: 41/42Primary Instructor: Simsek,Nil
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 41
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 40
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 2.4% 80.5% 2.4% 4.7 14.6% 41
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 5.0% 65.0% 5.0% 2.5% 4.4 22.5% 40
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 9.8% 48.8% 22.0% 3.8 19.5% 41
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 4.9% 56.1% 7.3% 2.4% 4.2 29.3% 41
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 4.9% 61.0% 7.3% 4.3 26.8% 41
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.9% 51.2% 7.3% 4.3 36.6% 41
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 70.7% 4.9% 2.4% 4.6 22.0% 41
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
61.0% 7.3% 2.4% 4.4 29.3% 41
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
63.4% 7.3% 7.3% 4.4 22.0% 41
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
65.9% 7.3% 9.8% 4.4 17.1% 41
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 7.5% 52.5% 7.5% 10.0% 4.1 22.5% 40
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 70.7% 4.9% 2.4% 4.6 22.0% 41
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 4.9% 63.4% 4.9% 4.9% 4.3 22.0% 41
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.9% 63.4% 4.9% 4.4 26.8% 41
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A2LB
Class Number: 17309
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 1004: General Chemistry for Engineers
Response Rate: 11/14Primary Instructor: Roy,Debasish
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
72.7% 9.1% 4.6 18.2% 11
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 72.7% 9.1% 4.6 18.2% 11
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 63.6% 9.1% 4.5 27.3% 11
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 81.8% 9.1% 4.7 9.1% 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 63.6% 9.1% 4.5 27.3% 11
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 81.8% 9.1% 4.7 9.1% 11
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 45.5% 9.1% 4.4 45.5% 11
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 54.5% 9.1% 18.2% 4.2 18.2% 11
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 In this course we gained a basic background in general chemistry. 54.5% 9.1% 4.5 36.4% 11
Q28 In this course we obtained a basic understanding of atomic and molecular structure
and their relationship to the properties of materials.
45.5% 9.1% 4.4 45.5% 11
Q29 In this course we obtained hands-on laboratory experience with experimental
techniques, chemical principles and materials.
63.6% 9.1% 4.5 27.3% 11
Q30 We found the electronic homework assignments to be a useful tool in learning
chemistry.
9.1% 45.5% 18.2% 4.0 27.3% 11
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 45.5% 18.2% 4.3 36.4% 11
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 90.9% 9.1% 4.8 11
Q40 Value was added to my education. 54.5% 9.1% 9.1% 4.3 27.3% 11
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 54.5% 18.2% 4.4 27.3% 11
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 54.5% 9.1% 18.2% 4.2 18.2% 11
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
36.4% 18.2% 4.2 45.5% 11
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 9.1% 54.5% 18.2% 4.1 18.2% 11
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: A2RC
Class Number: 17310
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 1004: General Chemistry for Engineers
Response Rate: 11/14Primary Instructor: Roy,Debasish
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 9.1% 81.8% 9.1% 11
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 90.9% 9.1% 11
A3. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 54.5% 9.1% 4.5 36.4% 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 72.7% 4.7 27.3% 11
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 45.5% 9.1% 4.3 45.5% 11
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 45.5% 18.2% 9.1% 4.0 27.3% 11
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 In this course we gained a basic background in general chemistry. 45.5% 18.2% 4.3 36.4% 11
Q28 In this course we obtained a basic understanding of atomic and molecular structure
and their relationship to the properties of materials.
54.5% 9.1% 4.5 36.4% 11
Q29 In this course we obtained hands-on laboratory experience with experimental
techniques, chemical principles and materials.
72.7% 9.1% 4.6 18.2% 11
Q30 We found the electronic homework assignments to be a useful tool in learning
chemistry.
18.2% 54.5% 18.2% 3.8 9.1% 11
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 45.5% 27.3% 9.1% 3.8 18.2% 11
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 54.5% 18.2% 9.1% 4.1 18.2% 11
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 9.1% 45.5% 9.1% 18.2% 3.8 18.2% 11
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 9.1% 36.4% 9.1% 9.1% 3.8 36.4% 11
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
9.1% 45.5% 18.2% 4.0 27.3% 11
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 18.2% 45.5% 9.1% 3.8 27.3% 11
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
72.7% 4.7 27.3% 11
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 54.5% 4.5 45.5% 11
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 72.7% 18.2% 4.5 9.1% 11
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: A3LB
Class Number: 17326
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 1024: General Chemistry II
Response Rate: 16/16Primary Instructor: Roy,Debasish
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
93.8% 4.9 6.3% 16
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 81.3% 6.3% 4.8 12.5% 16
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 62.5% 18.8% 4.4 18.8% 16
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 62.5% 18.8% 4.4 18.8% 16
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 56.3% 12.5% 4.4 31.3% 16
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 68.8% 6.3% 4.6 25.0% 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 75.0% 6.3% 4.7 18.8% 16
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 56.3% 18.8% 4.4 25.0% 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 62.5% 12.5% 4.5 25.0% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 68.8% 6.3% 4.6 25.0% 16
Q40 Value was added to my education. 56.3% 6.3% 4.5 37.5% 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 75.0% 6.3% 4.7 18.8% 16
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: A3RC
Class Number: 17327
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 1024: General Chemistry II
Response Rate: 15/16Primary Instructor: Roy,Debasish
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 6.7% 93.3% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 7.1% 92.9% 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 66.7% 13.3% 4.5 20.0% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 80.0% 6.7% 4.7 13.3% 15
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 73.3% 6.7% 6.7% 4.5 13.3% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 73.3% 13.3% 4.6 13.3% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 80.0% 6.7% 4.9 13.3% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 80.0% 6.7% 6.7% 4.8 6.7% 15
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 6.7% 6.7% 4.6 6.7% 15
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
80.0% 6.7% 6.7% 4.6 6.7% 15
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 73.3% 13.3% 4.6 13.3% 15
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 80.0% 6.7% 6.7% 4.8 6.7% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: A4LB
Class Number: 17574
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 1024: General Chemistry II
Response Rate: 16/17Primary Instructor: Roy,Debasish
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
81.3% 12.5% 4.9 6.3% 16
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 43.8% 12.5% 6.3% 4.4 37.5% 16
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 81.3% 12.5% 4.9 6.3% 16
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 81.3% 12.5% 6.3% 4.8 16
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 68.8% 12.5% 4.8 18.8% 16
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 75.0% 12.5% 4.9 12.5% 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 62.5% 12.5% 6.3% 4.6 18.8% 16
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 12.5% 12.5% 4.4 25.0% 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 12.5% 6.3% 4.5 31.3% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 81.3% 12.5% 4.9 6.3% 16
Q40 Value was added to my education. 75.0% 12.5% 4.9 12.5% 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 68.8% 12.5% 4.8 18.8% 16
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 5 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: A4RC
Class Number: 17575
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 1024: General Chemistry II
Response Rate: 16/17Primary Instructor: Roy,Debasish
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 6.3% 87.5% 6.3% 16
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 6.7% 80.0% 13.3% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 87.5% 6.3% 4.9 6.3% 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 81.3% 6.3% 4.9 12.5% 16
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 75.0% 6.3% 4.8 18.8% 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 87.5% 6.3% 4.9 6.3% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 87.5% 6.3% 4.9 6.3% 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 93.8% 6.3% 5.0 16
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 81.3% 6.3% 4.9 12.5% 16
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
81.3% 6.3% 4.9 12.5% 16
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 93.3% 6.7% 5.0 15
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 93.8% 6.3% 5.0 16
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 6 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17191
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CBE 1002: INTRODUCTION TO CHEMICAL & BIOMOLECULAR ENGINEERING
Response Rate: 43/66Primary Instructor: Mijovic,Jovan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 4.8% 92.9% 2.4% 42
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 43
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 81.4% 2.3% 4.8 16.3% 43
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 54.8% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 4.5 38.1% 42
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 2.3% 81.4% 4.7% 4.7 11.6% 43
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 62.8% 11.6% 2.3% 4.4 23.3% 43
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 46.5% 7.0% 9.3% 4.2 37.2% 43
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 55.8% 4.7% 4.5 39.5% 43
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have a better understanding of my chosen major 60.0% 5.0% 10.0% 4.4 25.0% 40
Q28 I have a fundamental understanding of many processes used in chem and bio
engineering.
45.0% 10.0% 4.3 45.0% 40
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 35.7% 7.1% 7.1% 4.1 50.0% 42
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 44.2% 11.6% 4.3 44.2% 43
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 53.5% 2.3% 18.6% 4.3 25.6% 43
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 51.2% 2.3% 18.6% 4.3 27.9% 43
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17167
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CBE 4173: Polymeric Materials
Response Rate: 36/50Primary Instructor: Mijovic,Jovan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 2.8% 97.2% 36
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 2.9% 97.1% 34
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 88.9% 2.8% 4.8 8.3% 36
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 52.8% 8.3% 16.7% 4.2 22.2% 36
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 2.8% 66.7% 2.8% 11.1% 4.4 16.7% 36
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 30.6% 33.3% 11.1% 5.6% 3.1 19.4% 36
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 2.8% 58.3% 2.8% 2.8% 4.4 33.3% 36
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 2.9% 54.3% 5.7% 4.4 37.1% 35
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Through this course I developed a better understanding of my professional and
ethical responsibilities.
8.3% 33.3% 2.8% 2.8% 27.8% 3.7 25.0% 36
Q28 My ability to prepare and present an oral report was enhanced through this course. 22.2% 19.4% 2.8% 13.9% 33.3% 2.9 8.3% 36
Q29 I am aware of current trends and contemporary issues with polymeric materials. 2.8% 50.0% 5.6% 8.3% 4.2 33.3% 36
Q30 I have a greater understanding of the fundamental principles of the science and
engineering of macromolecules.
2.8% 58.3% 4.5 38.9% 36
Q31 I have an understanding of the physical, electrical and optical properties of
polymers and polymer blends.
2.8% 44.4% 5.6% 4.3 47.2% 36
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 5.6% 27.8% 16.7% 8.3% 3.7 41.7% 36
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 69.4% 2.8% 5.6% 4.6 22.2% 36
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 8.3% 55.6% 8.3% 8.3% 4.1 19.4% 36
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 2.8% 52.8% 2.8% 8.3% 4.3 33.3% 36
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A41 I have enhanced my ability to develop a recognition of the need for, and an ability
to engage in life-long learning
2.8% 52.8% 5.6% 13.9% 4.2 25.0% 36
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 2.8% 50.0% 5.6% 11.1% 4.2 30.6% 36
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16743
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6091: Financial Econometrics
Response Rate: 11/10Primary Instructor: Dessertine,Segolene
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 9.1% 90.9% 11
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 9.1% 81.8% 9.1% 11
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 9.1% 45.5% 9.1% 4.0 36.4% 11
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 63.6% 9.1% 9.1% 4.4 18.2% 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 27.3% 18.2% 36.4% 3.5 18.2% 11
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 36.4% 54.5% 3.8 9.1% 11
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 36.4% 27.3% 9.1% 3.7 27.3% 11
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 9.1% 54.5% 18.2% 3.9 18.2% 11
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 9.1% 36.4% 18.2% 3.9 36.4% 11
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 36.4% 18.2% 4.0 45.5% 11
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 9.1% 45.5% 9.1% 9.1% 3.9 27.3% 11
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 36.4% 18.2% 4.0 45.5% 11
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16593
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6351: Econometrics and Time Series Analysis
Response Rate: 13/12Primary Instructor: Dessertine,Segolene
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 13
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 7.7% 92.3% 13
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 76.9% 7.7% 4.7 15.4% 13
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 61.5% 7.7% 15.4% 4.3 15.4% 13
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 61.5% 7.7% 4.5 30.8% 13
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 69.2% 7.7% 4.6 23.1% 13
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 69.2% 7.7% 4.6 23.1% 13
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 69.2% 7.7% 4.6 23.1% 13
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 53.8% 7.7% 7.7% 4.3 30.8% 13
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 53.8% 7.7% 4.5 38.5% 13
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 46.2% 15.4% 7.7% 4.1 30.8% 13
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 46.2% 7.7% 4.3 46.2% 13
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 23251
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6871: R in Finance
Response Rate: 5/6Primary Instructor: Dessertine,Segolene
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
20.0% 40.0% 20.0% 3.6 20.0% 5
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 5
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 5
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 80.0% 20.0% 4.6 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 50.0% 25.0% 4.3 25.0% 4
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 5
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 23232
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 6163: Finite Element Methods
Response Rate: 6/7Primary Instructor: Khair-Eldin,Omar
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 16.7% 83.3% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 6
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 16.7% 4.3 33.3% 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 66.7% 33.3% 4.0 6
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 66.7% 16.7% 4.5 16.7% 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 66.7% 33.3% 4.3 6
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 16.7% 4.2 33.3% 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 6
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 66.7% 16.7% 4.5 16.7% 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17704
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
STS 3214: SCIENCE & FEMINISM
Response Rate: 28/32Primary Instructor: Maldonado-Salcedo,Melissa
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 28
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 28
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 28
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 85.7% 3.6% 4.8 10.7% 28
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 82.1% 4.8 17.9% 28
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 28
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 78.6% 3.6% 3.6% 4.7 14.3% 28
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 71.4% 14.3% 4.6 14.3% 28
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have enhanced my ability to effectively communicate including being able to give
oral presentations that increase knowledge, foster understanding, or encourage
change.
82.1% 4.8 17.9% 28
Q28 I have enhanced by ability to read effectively, including being able to extract and to
create meaning from the written texts.
85.7% 4.9 14.3% 28
Q29 I developed perspectives of the humanities and social sciences to bear within
technical discourse.
89.3% 4.9 10.7% 28
Q30 I have enhanced my ability to understand and demonstrate the relationship
between content of scientific and technological knowledge, and the social and
intellectual context in which it is created.
85.7% 4.9 14.3% 28
Q31 I have enhanced my ability to understand and demonstrate how social processes
frame scientific and technological enterprises, including theory construction,
invention, and innovation.
78.6% 4.8 21.4% 28
Q32 I have enhanced my ability to understand and demonstrate how science and
technology shape society (in historical, philosophical, sociological, cultural and
technical ways).
85.7% 4.9 14.3% 28
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 75.0% 3.6% 3.6% 4.6 17.9% 28
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 89.3% 4.9 10.7% 28
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 92.9% 3.6% 4.9 3.6% 28
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 92.9% 3.6% 4.9 3.6% 28
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16564
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
IE 6203: Project Planning and Control (Project Management)
Response Rate: 17/17Primary Instructor: De Lessio,Mark Philip
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 17
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 11.8% 88.2% 17
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 47.1% 4.5 52.9% 17
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 58.8% 5.9% 11.8% 4.4 23.5% 17
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 76.5% 4.8 23.5% 17
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 37.5% 6.3% 4.3 56.3% 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 35.3% 11.8% 5.9% 4.1 47.1% 17
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 41.2% 11.8% 17.6% 4.0 29.4% 17
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 5.9% 23.5% 5.9% 11.8% 3.8 52.9% 17
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
29.4% 11.8% 4.1 58.8% 17
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
41.2% 5.9% 5.9% 4.2 47.1% 17
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
47.1% 11.8% 5.9% 4.2 35.3% 17
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 37.5% 25.0% 6.3% 3.8 31.3% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 17.6% 5.9% 4.1 76.5% 17
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 35.3% 5.9% 17.6% 4.1 41.2% 17
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 5.9% 17.6% 11.8% 23.5% 3.5 41.2% 17
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 16335
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 8203: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Response Rate: 33/34Primary Instructor: De Lessio,Mark Philip
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 33
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 16.1% 83.9% 31
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 39.4% 9.1% 21.2% 4.0 30.3% 33
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 3.0% 45.5% 3.0% 9.1% 15.2% 4.0 24.2% 33
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 60.6% 3.0% 15.2% 4.4 21.2% 33
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 12.1% 36.4% 12.1% 24.2% 3.5 15.2% 33
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 39.4% 12.1% 30.3% 3.8 18.2% 33
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 36.4% 18.2% 4.2 45.5% 33
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 3.1% 28.1% 3.1% 18.8% 18.8% 3.6 28.1% 32
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
3.1% 31.3% 3.1% 6.3% 18.8% 3.9 37.5% 32
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
3.1% 31.3% 3.1% 12.5% 21.9% 3.7 28.1% 32
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
40.6% 3.1% 15.6% 21.9% 3.9 18.8% 32
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 6.1% 21.2% 3.0% 6.1% 27.3% 3.6 36.4% 33
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 36.4% 6.1% 21.2% 4.0 36.4% 33
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 9.1% 33.3% 12.1% 21.2% 3.6 24.2% 33
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 6.1% 45.5% 6.1% 21.2% 3.9 21.2% 33
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16379
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6233: Introduction to Operating Systems
Response Rate: 37/49Primary Instructor: Baliga,Arati
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 37
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 37
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 2.8% 47.2% 11.1% 4.2 38.9% 36
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 2.7% 51.4% 8.1% 10.8% 4.2 27.0% 37
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 2.7% 62.2% 2.7% 5.4% 4.4 27.0% 37
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 5.4% 67.6% 4.5 27.0% 37
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 56.8% 8.1% 8.1% 4.3 27.0% 37
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 2.7% 64.9% 2.7% 4.5 29.7% 37
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 2.7% 62.2% 5.4% 2.7% 4.4 27.0% 37
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 5.4% 56.8% 2.7% 5.4% 4.3 29.7% 37
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
2.7% 48.6% 2.7% 2.7% 4.3 43.2% 37
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 2.7% 48.6% 8.1% 2.7% 4.2 37.8% 37
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
2.7% 43.2% 2.7% 2.7% 4.3 48.6% 37
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 2.7% 56.8% 5.4% 8.1% 4.3 27.0% 37
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 2.7% 54.1% 2.7% 2.7% 4.4 37.8% 37
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 2.7% 48.6% 2.7% 13.5% 4.2 32.4% 37
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 2.8% 44.4% 22.2% 4.1 30.6% 36
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 2.7% 48.6% 13.5% 4.3 35.1% 37
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 5.4% 54.1% 8.1% 16.2% 4.1 16.2% 37
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 8.1% 48.6% 2.7% 10.8% 16.2% 3.9 13.5% 37
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 2.7% 40.5% 5.4% 4.2 51.4% 37
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 2.7% 45.9% 8.1% 4.3 43.2% 37
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 2.7% 48.6% 5.4% 8.1% 4.2 35.1% 37
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 2.7% 54.1% 2.7% 13.5% 4.3 27.0% 37
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16763
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 9223: SELECTED TOPICS IN CS
Response Rate: 9/13Primary Instructor: Baliga,Arati
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 9
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 9
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 55.6% 4.6 44.4% 9
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 44.4% 11.1% 22.2% 4.0 22.2% 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 33.3% 11.1% 4.1 55.6% 9
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 33.3% 11.1% 4.1 55.6% 9
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 11.1% 55.6% 4.2 33.3% 9
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 44.4% 11.1% 11.1% 4.1 33.3% 9
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 11.1% 55.6% 22.2% 4.0 11.1% 9
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 11.1% 66.7% 4.3 22.2% 9
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
44.4% 22.2% 4.2 33.3% 9
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 11.1% 55.6% 22.2% 4.0 11.1% 9
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
33.3% 11.1% 11.1% 4.0 44.4% 9
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 22.2% 11.1% 4.0 66.7% 9
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 44.4% 11.1% 4.3 44.4% 9
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 44.4% 55.6% 3.9 9
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 44.4% 44.4% 4.0 11.1% 9
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 33.3% 44.4% 3.9 22.2% 9
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 66.7% 11.1% 4.6 22.2% 9
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 44.4% 22.2% 4.2 33.3% 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 11.1% 44.4% 11.1% 4.0 33.3% 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 55.6% 4.6 44.4% 9
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 11.1% 55.6% 22.2% 4.0 11.1% 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 55.6% 22.2% 4.3 22.2% 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 22170
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CBE 9413: SELCT TPCS CHEM & BIO ENGR II
Response Rate: 12/17Primary Instructor: Pine,David J
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 41.7% 33.3% 25.0% 12
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 12
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 91.7% 4.9 8.3% 12
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 8.3% 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 8.3% 3.4 33.3% 12
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 16.7% 33.3% 16.7% 4.0 33.3% 12
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 75.0% 8.3% 4.6 16.7% 12
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 83.3% 8.3% 4.8 8.3% 12
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 8.3% 4.3 41.7% 12
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 12
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 75.0% 8.3% 4.6 16.7% 12
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 60.0% 10.0% 4.5 30.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: ALEC
Class Number: 17080
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 1114: INTRO TO PROGRAMMING & PROBLEM SOLVING
Response Rate: 21/43Primary Instructor: Tal,Itay
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 9.5% 85.7% 4.8% 21
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 95.2% 4.8% 21
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 71.4% 4.8% 4.7 23.8% 21
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 4.8% 33.3% 38.1% 3.8 23.8% 21
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 23.8% 33.3% 23.8% 3.3 19.0% 21
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 33.3% 9.5% 14.3% 4.0 42.9% 21
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 42.9% 4.8% 4.8% 4.3 47.6% 21
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 14.3% 33.3% 9.5% 9.5% 14.3% 3.5 19.0% 21
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I am comfortable with writing conditional statements and loops in Python 71.4% 14.3% 4.6 14.3% 21
Q28 I am comfortable with breaking a large problem into pieces and implementing and
calling functions in Python
38.1% 9.5% 19.0% 4.0 33.3% 21
Q29 I am comfortable with using lists and dictionaries in Python 9.5% 28.6% 9.5% 19.0% 3.6 33.3% 21
Q30 You were taught and encouraged good software development practices. 52.4% 19.0% 4.3 28.6% 21
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 38.1% 4.8% 14.3% 19.0% 3.9 23.8% 21
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 61.9% 4.8% 19.0% 4.5 14.3% 21
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 61.9% 4.8% 19.0% 4.5 14.3% 21
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 52.4% 9.5% 14.3% 4.4 23.8% 21
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
57.1% 9.5% 4.8% 4.3 28.6% 21
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 52.4% 4.8% 23.8% 4.2 19.0% 21
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 28.6% 14.3% 42.9% 3.6 14.3% 21
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
42.9% 9.5% 23.8% 4.0 23.8% 21
Y. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 38.1% 4.8% 4.3 57.1% 21
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 42.9% 9.5% 4.3 47.6% 21
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 30.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.0 50.0% 20
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: ALEC
Class Number: 17080
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 1114: INTRO TO PROGRAMMING & PROBLEM SOLVING
Response Rate: 21/43Primary Instructor: Tal,Itay
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
Y. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
38.1% 4.8% 4.8% 33.3% 4.0 19.0% 21
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 10.0% 35.0% 10.0% 35.0% 3.7 10.0% 20
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 47.6% 9.5% 14.3% 4.1 28.6% 21
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: BLEC
Class Number: 17081
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 1114: INTRO TO PROGRAMMING & PROBLEM SOLVING
Response Rate: 14/26Primary Instructor: Tal,Itay
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 85.7% 14.3% 14
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 85.7% 14.3% 14
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 71.4% 7.1% 4.8 21.4% 14
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 42.9% 7.1% 21.4% 4.2 28.6% 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 14.3% 7.1% 28.6% 14.3% 3.4 35.7% 14
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 21.4% 7.1% 7.1% 14.3% 3.9 50.0% 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 7.1% 14.3% 4.4 28.6% 14
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 14.3% 14.3% 21.4% 21.4% 3.4 28.6% 14
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I am comfortable with writing conditional statements and loops in Python 69.2% 7.7% 4.8 23.1% 13
Q28 I am comfortable with breaking a large problem into pieces and implementing and
calling functions in Python
38.5% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 4.2 38.5% 13
Q29 I am comfortable with using lists and dictionaries in Python 23.1% 7.7% 38.5% 7.7% 3.3 23.1% 13
Q30 You were taught and encouraged good software development practices. 38.5% 7.7% 30.8% 4.1 23.1% 13
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 35.7% 7.1% 7.1% 7.1% 4.2 42.9% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 7.1% 64.3% 7.1% 14.3% 4.3 7.1% 14
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 57.1% 7.1% 21.4% 4.4 14.3% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 64.3% 7.1% 7.1% 4.6 21.4% 14
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
30.8% 7.7% 15.4% 4.2 46.2% 13
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 38.5% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 4.2 38.5% 13
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 15.4% 7.7% 53.8% 3.6 23.1% 13
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
30.8% 7.7% 30.8% 4.0 30.8% 13
Y. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 46.2% 7.7% 7.7% 4.4 38.5% 13
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 53.8% 7.7% 7.7% 4.5 30.8% 13
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 38.5% 7.7% 7.7% 15.4% 4.1 30.8% 13
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: BLEC
Class Number: 17081
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 1114: INTRO TO PROGRAMMING & PROBLEM SOLVING
Response Rate: 14/26Primary Instructor: Tal,Itay
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
Y. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
38.5% 15.4% 15.4% 4.3 30.8% 13
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 46.2% 15.4% 38.5% 4.1 13
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 61.5% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 4.4 15.4% 13
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 16678
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6033: Design and Analysis of Algorithms I
Response Rate: 42/55Primary Instructor: Tal,Itay
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 2.4% 95.2% 2.4% 42
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 9.5% 90.5% 42
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 71.4% 2.4% 9.5% 4.6 16.7% 42
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 54.8% 4.8% 16.7% 4.3 23.8% 42
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 2.4% 52.4% 4.8% 9.5% 4.3 31.0% 42
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 7.1% 59.5% 4.8% 9.5% 4.2 19.0% 42
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 54.8% 2.4% 7.1% 4.8% 4.4 31.0% 42
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 2.4% 45.2% 9.5% 16.7% 4.0 26.2% 42
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 2.4% 52.4% 16.7% 2.4% 4.1 26.2% 42
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 64.3% 4.8% 2.4% 4.5 28.6% 42
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 4.8% 57.1% 4.8% 9.5% 4.3 23.8% 42
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 2.4% 64.3% 2.4% 4.8% 7.1% 4.4 19.0% 42
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 5 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 17052
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 4623: ANALYSIS II
Response Rate: 5/19Primary Instructor: Zhang,Gaoyong
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 5
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 20.0% 4.2 80.0% 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 40.0% 20.0% 4.2 40.0% 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 40.0% 20.0% 4.2 40.0% 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 20.0% 4.2 80.0% 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 20.0% 20.0% 3.8 60.0% 5
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
20.0% 20.0% 40.0% 3.8 20.0% 5
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 40.0% 20.0% 2.6 40.0% 5
Q29 I need more HW problems. 20.0% 40.0% 20.0% 2.4 20.0% 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 20.0% 3.6 80.0% 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 20.0% 20.0% 4.0 60.0% 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 20.0% 20.0% 4.0 60.0% 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 20.0% 20.0% 40.0% 3.4 20.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16222
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 6223: Elements of Real Analysis II
Response Rate: 2/9Primary Instructor: Zhang,Gaoyong
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 2
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 2
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 50.0% 3.5 2
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 2
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 2
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
50.0% 50.0% 3.5 2
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2
Q29 I need more HW problems. 50.0% 50.0% 2.0 2
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 50.0% 5.0 2
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 50.0% 50.0% 5.0 2
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 50.0% 5.0 2
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: E
Class Number: 21587
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 9103: SPECIAL TOPICS IN DIGITAL MEDIA
Response Rate: 7/8Primary Instructor: Ducao,Arlene B
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 14.3% 85.7% 7
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 14.3% 85.7% 7
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 57.1% 14.3% 4.4 28.6% 7
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 42.9% 14.3% 4.1 42.9% 7
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 28.6% 28.6% 14.3% 3.6 28.6% 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 42.9% 14.3% 4.1 42.9% 7
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 42.9% 14.3% 4.3 42.9% 7
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 42.9% 14.3% 4.3 42.9% 7
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17544
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
URB 3214: CITIES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
Response Rate: 15/28Primary Instructor: Gladstone,Susan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 6.7% 93.3% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 15
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 86.7% 4.9 13.3% 15
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 15
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 93.3% 4.9 6.7% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 73.3% 4.7 26.7% 15
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 15
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have enhanced my ability to effectively communicate including being able to give
oral presentations that increase knowledge, foster understanding, or encourage
change.
6.7% 80.0% 4.6 13.3% 15
Q28 I have enhanced by ability to read effectively, including being able to extract and to
create meaning from the written texts.
6.7% 66.7% 6.7% 4.4 20.0% 15
Q29 I developed perspectives of the humanities and social sciences to bear within
technical discourse.
80.0% 6.7% 4.7 13.3% 15
Q30 I have enhanced my ability to understand and demonstrate the relationship
between content of scientific and technological knowledge, and the social and
intellectual context in which it is created.
6.7% 73.3% 4.5 20.0% 15
Q31 I have enhanced my ability to understand and demonstrate how social processes
frame scientific and technological enterprises, including theory construction,
invention, and innovation.
73.3% 6.7% 4.6 20.0% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 80.0% 13.3% 4.5 6.7% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 6.7% 86.7% 4.7 6.7% 15
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 6.7% 86.7% 4.7 6.7% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 6.7% 86.7% 4.7 6.7% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 24599
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
URB 3834: SPECIAL TOPICS IN SUSTAINABLE URBAN ENVIRONMENTS
Response Rate: 4/8Primary Instructor: Roane,James
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 4
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 75.0% 25.0% 4
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 4
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 4
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 75.0% 25.0% 4.5 4
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 75.0% 25.0% 4.5 4
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have enhanced my ability to understand Urban History and Policy. 100.0% 5.0 4
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 4
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17406
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 3193: Introduction to Very Large Scale Integrated Circuits
Response Rate: 37/49Primary Instructor: Garg,Siddharth
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 37
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 2.8% 94.4% 2.8% 36
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 81.1% 2.7% 5.4% 4.7 10.8% 37
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 2.7% 54.1% 5.4% 16.2% 4.2 21.6% 37
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 21.6% 24.3% 24.3% 3.5 29.7% 37
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 41.7% 8.3% 11.1% 4.1 38.9% 36
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 2.7% 62.2% 8.1% 4.5 27.0% 37
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 10.8% 35.1% 5.4% 37.8% 3.5 10.8% 37
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 54.1% 5.4% 13.5% 4.3 27.0% 37
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 59.5% 2.7% 5.4% 4.5 32.4% 37
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 67.6% 2.7% 5.4% 4.6 24.3% 37
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 62.2% 2.7% 8.1% 4.5 27.0% 37
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: BK02
Class Number: 22136
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 3943: SPECIAL TOPICS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE
Response Rate: 25/31Primary Instructor: Nelson,Lucas
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 4.0% 96.0% 25
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 20.0% 72.0% 8.0% 25
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 4.0% 4.8 16.0% 25
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 80.0% 4.0% 4.8 16.0% 25
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 44.0% 20.0% 4.0 36.0% 25
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 4.0% 56.0% 8.0% 4.0% 4.2 28.0% 25
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 68.0% 8.0% 4.5 24.0% 25
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.0% 44.0% 8.0% 16.0% 4.2 28.0% 25
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 44.0% 4.0% 12.0% 4.2 40.0% 25
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 80.0% 4.0% 4.8 16.0% 25
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 76.0% 4.0% 4.7 20.0% 25
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 72.0% 4.0% 8.0% 4.6 16.0% 25
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: F
Class Number: 16830
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 9223: SELECTED TOPICS IN CS
Response Rate: 25/31Primary Instructor: Nelson,Lucas
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 4.0% 96.0% 25
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 20.0% 72.0% 8.0% 25
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 4.0% 4.8 16.0% 25
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 80.0% 4.0% 4.8 16.0% 25
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 44.0% 20.0% 4.0 36.0% 25
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 4.0% 56.0% 8.0% 4.0% 4.2 28.0% 25
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 68.0% 8.0% 4.5 24.0% 25
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.0% 44.0% 8.0% 16.0% 4.2 28.0% 25
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 44.0% 4.0% 12.0% 4.2 40.0% 25
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 80.0% 4.0% 4.8 16.0% 25
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 76.0% 4.0% 4.7 20.0% 25
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 72.0% 4.0% 8.0% 4.6 16.0% 25
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17168
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CBE 4213: Engineering Laboratory II
Response Rate: 15/15Primary Instructor: Wang,Xin
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
66.7% 6.7% 6.7% 4.6 20.0% 15
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 66.7% 6.7% 26.7% 1.5 15
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 15
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 86.7% 4.9 13.3% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 46.7% 20.0% 20.0% 3.9 13.3% 15
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 60.0% 6.7% 4.5 33.3% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 13.3% 33.3% 26.7% 6.7% 3.3 20.0% 15
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 20.0% 26.7% 33.3% 13.3% 2.9 6.7% 15
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have improved my ability to plan and conduct experiments. 6.7% 40.0% 6.7% 26.7% 3.8 20.0% 15
Q28 I am much more confident in my ability to prepare written technical reports. 6.7% 46.7% 6.7% 4.2 40.0% 15
Q29 I have a much better understanding of data analysis techniques including error
analysis and propagation.
6.7% 53.3% 13.3% 4.1 26.7% 15
Q30 I am more comfortable working on a team, both as a team leader and as a team
member
60.0% 4.6 40.0% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 6.7% 26.7% 6.7% 13.3% 3.8 46.7% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 73.3% 6.7% 4.7 20.0% 15
Q40 Value was added to my education. 6.7% 33.3% 13.3% 13.3% 3.7 33.3% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 20.0% 20.0% 13.3% 20.0% 3.1 26.7% 15
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
6.7% 46.7% 4.3 46.7% 15
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 46.7% 13.3% 4.3 40.0% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: C
Class Number: 17396
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CBE 4213: Engineering Laboratory II
Response Rate: 12/12Primary Instructor: Wang,Xin
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
91.7% 4.9 8.3% 12
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 58.3% 16.7% 16.7% 2.1 8.3% 12
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 91.7% 4.9 8.3% 12
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 12
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 12
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 91.7% 4.9 8.3% 12
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 8.3% 4.4 41.7% 12
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 8.3% 33.3% 8.3% 33.3% 3.6 16.7% 12
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have improved my ability to plan and conduct experiments. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 12
Q28 I am much more confident in my ability to prepare written technical reports. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 12
Q29 I have a much better understanding of data analysis techniques including error
analysis and propagation.
66.7% 4.7 33.3% 12
Q30 I am more comfortable working on a team, both as a team leader and as a team
member
66.7% 4.7 33.3% 12
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 8.3% 4.3 58.3% 12
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 91.7% 4.9 8.3% 12
Q40 Value was added to my education. 75.0% 8.3% 4.6 16.7% 12
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 8.3% 33.3% 4.0 8.3% 12
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
66.7% 4.7 33.3% 12
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 58.3% 8.3% 4.5 33.3% 12
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17181
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 3604: Electromagnetic Waves
Response Rate: 31/36Primary Instructor: Das,Nirod K
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 96.7% 3.3% 30
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 3.3% 96.7% 30
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 3.2% 51.6% 3.2% 9.7% 4.3 32.3% 31
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 32.3% 3.2% 12.9% 22.6% 3.8 29.0% 31
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 9.7% 22.6% 22.6% 12.9% 3.4 32.3% 31
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 3.2% 29.0% 19.4% 22.6% 3.6 25.8% 31
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 9.7% 25.8% 22.6% 16.1% 3.4 25.8% 31
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 16.1% 25.8% 19.4% 3.2% 3.4 35.5% 31
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 9.7% 19.4% 12.9% 22.6% 3.4 35.5% 31
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 6.5% 29.0% 9.7% 16.1% 3.7 38.7% 31
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 16.1% 19.4% 3.2% 9.7% 22.6% 3.3 29.0% 31
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 9.7% 22.6% 3.2% 3.2% 35.5% 3.5 25.8% 31
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: A1LB
Class Number: 17386
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 3604: Electromagnetic Waves
Response Rate: 10/9Primary Instructor: Das,Nirod K
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
70.0% 10.0% 20.0% 4.3 10
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 3.8 40.0% 10
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 50.0% 10.0% 4.4 40.0% 10
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 90.0% 10.0% 4.8 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 30.0% 10.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.7 20.0% 10
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 10.0% 20.0% 10.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.2 20.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 40.0% 30.0% 3.8 30.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 40.0% 20.0% 20.0% 10.0% 2.5 10.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 40.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.1 40.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 70.0% 10.0% 4.6 20.0% 10
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.2 30.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 10.0% 50.0% 10.0% 4.1 30.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: A2LB
Class Number: 17387
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 3604: Electromagnetic Waves
Response Rate: 4/5Primary Instructor: Das,Nirod K
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 25.0% 4.3 75.0% 4
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 4
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 4
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 25.0% 25.0% 4.0 50.0% 4
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 25.0% 25.0% 4.0 50.0% 4
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 25.0% 3.8 75.0% 4
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 25.0% 3.5 75.0% 4
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 3.5 50.0% 4
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.0 100.0% 4
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 25.0% 3.8 75.0% 4
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: B1LB
Class Number: 17388
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 3604: Electromagnetic Waves
Response Rate: 1/10Primary Instructor: Das,Nirod K
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
100.0% 5.0 1
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 100.0% 5.0 1
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 1
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 1
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 1
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.0 100.0% 1
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 2.0 1
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.0 100.0% 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: B2LB
Class Number: 17389
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 3604: Electromagnetic Waves
Response Rate: 1/12Primary Instructor: Das,Nirod K
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
100.0% 5.0 1
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 100.0% 5.0 1
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 1
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 1
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 1
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 2.0 1
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 1
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 5 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16319
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 6723: ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION AND ANTENNAS
Response Rate: 5/6Primary Instructor: Das,Nirod K
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 20.0% 60.0% 20.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 5
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 6 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17593
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 4533: Interactive Computer Graphics
Response Rate: 26/37Primary Instructor: Nealen,Andrew
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 3.8% 96.2% 26
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 26
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 92.3% 3.8% 4.9 3.8% 26
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 84.6% 11.5% 4.7 3.8% 26
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 76.9% 3.8% 4.7 19.2% 26
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 88.5% 3.8% 4.8 7.7% 26
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 76.9% 3.8% 4.7 19.2% 26
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 80.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.7 12.0% 25
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 65.4% 15.4% 11.5% 4.2 7.7% 26
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 80.8% 7.7% 4.7 11.5% 26
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 80.8% 3.8% 11.5% 4.6 3.8% 26
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 65.4% 3.8% 15.4% 4.4 15.4% 26
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17595
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 4553: Game Design
Response Rate: 23/23Primary Instructor: Nealen,Andrew
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 8.7% 91.3% 23
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 8.7% 91.3% 23
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 91.3% 4.9 8.7% 23
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 69.6% 8.7% 13.0% 4.6 8.7% 23
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 81.8% 4.5% 9.1% 4.6 4.5% 22
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 72.7% 13.6% 4.6 13.6% 22
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 73.9% 4.3% 4.7 21.7% 23
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.3% 43.5% 4.3% 4.3% 39.1% 3.8 4.3% 23
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.3% 60.9% 4.5 34.8% 23
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 78.3% 4.8 21.7% 23
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 91.3% 4.3% 4.9 4.3% 23
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 82.6% 4.8 17.4% 23
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16242
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6533: Interactive Computer Graphics
Response Rate: 26/37Primary Instructor: Nealen,Andrew
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 3.8% 96.2% 26
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 26
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 92.3% 3.8% 4.9 3.8% 26
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 84.6% 11.5% 4.7 3.8% 26
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 76.9% 3.8% 4.7 19.2% 26
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 88.5% 3.8% 4.8 7.7% 26
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 76.9% 3.8% 4.7 19.2% 26
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 80.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.7 12.0% 25
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 65.4% 15.4% 11.5% 4.2 7.7% 26
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 80.8% 7.7% 4.7 11.5% 26
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 80.8% 3.8% 11.5% 4.6 3.8% 26
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 65.4% 3.8% 15.4% 4.4 15.4% 26
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16918
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6553: Game Design
Response Rate: 23/23Primary Instructor: Nealen,Andrew
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 8.7% 91.3% 23
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 8.7% 91.3% 23
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 91.3% 4.9 8.7% 23
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 69.6% 8.7% 13.0% 4.6 8.7% 23
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 81.8% 4.5% 9.1% 4.6 4.5% 22
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 72.7% 13.6% 4.6 13.6% 22
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 73.9% 4.3% 4.7 21.7% 23
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.3% 43.5% 4.3% 4.3% 39.1% 3.8 4.3% 23
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.3% 60.9% 4.5 34.8% 23
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 78.3% 4.8 21.7% 23
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 91.3% 4.3% 4.9 4.3% 23
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 82.6% 4.8 17.4% 23
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17521
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
CAM 2014W: STEM & THEATER
Response Rate: 17/17Primary Instructor: Goldstein,Allan B
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 17
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 17
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 17
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 88.2% 5.9% 4.9 5.9% 17
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 17
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 94.1% 5.9% 4.8 17
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 94.1% 5.9% 4.8 17
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 82.4% 5.9% 11.8% 4.8 17
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have enhanced my ability to read effectively, including being able to extract and
to create meaning from the written texts.
5.9% 76.5% 4.6 17.6% 17
Q28 I better understand the conflict scientists face between creative motivations and
ethical/moral issues.
82.4% 5.9% 4.7 11.8% 17
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 70.6% 5.9% 4.6 23.5% 17
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 5.9% 88.2% 4.7 5.9% 17
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 94.1% 5.9% 4.8 17
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 5.9% 94.1% 4.8 17
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17522
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
CAM 2204: Disability Studies
Response Rate: 25/26Primary Instructor: Goldstein,Allan B
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 25
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 25
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 25
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 24
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 92.0% 4.9 8.0% 25
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 88.0% 4.9 12.0% 25
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 92.0% 4.9 8.0% 25
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 25
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I am more confident in my ability to communicate with all kinds of people. 88.0% 4.9 12.0% 25
Q28 I better understand the power of digital media. 96.0% 5.0 4.0% 25
Q29 I am informed about the oppression faced by people with disabilities. 100.0% 5.0 25
Q30 I believe that disability is not an individual medical issue but a social issue. 4.0% 88.0% 4.0% 4.7 4.0% 25
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 88.0% 4.0% 4.8 8.0% 25
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 96.0% 5.0 4.0% 25
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 96.0% 5.0 4.0% 25
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 96.0% 5.0 4.0% 25
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 17523
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
CAM 2204: Disability Studies
Response Rate: 24/27Primary Instructor: Goldstein,Allan B
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 24
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 24
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 75.0% 4.2% 4.7 20.8% 24
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 79.2% 8.3% 4.7 12.5% 24
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 95.8% 5.0 4.2% 24
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 24
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 83.3% 4.2% 4.8 12.5% 24
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 58.3% 4.2% 20.8% 4.3 16.7% 24
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I am more confident in my ability to communicate with all kinds of people. 79.2% 4.2% 4.8 16.7% 24
Q28 I better understand the power of digital media. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 24
Q29 I am informed about the oppression faced by people with disabilities. 91.7% 4.9 8.3% 24
Q30 I believe that disability is not an individual medical issue but a social issue. 91.7% 4.9 8.3% 24
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 79.2% 4.2% 4.8 16.7% 24
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 91.7% 4.9 8.3% 24
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 83.3% 4.2% 4.9 12.5% 24
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 87.5% 4.2% 4.2% 4.8 4.2% 24
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 17302
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 3413: Automatic Control
Response Rate: 28/41Primary Instructor: Lee,Sang-Hoon
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 3.6% 96.4% 28
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 28
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 28
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 71.4% 3.6% 3.6% 4.7 21.4% 28
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 71.4% 7.1% 7.1% 4.7 14.3% 28
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 75.0% 3.6% 3.6% 4.7 17.9% 28
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 67.9% 7.1% 4.6 25.0% 28
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 53.6% 3.6% 14.3% 4.3 28.6% 28
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learned mathematical modeling and analysis of dynamic systems (e.g., mechanical,
aerospace, electrical, robotic, thermo-fluid, and vibratory systems).
60.7% 3.6% 4.6 35.7% 28
Q28 Learned basic concepts of feedback control systems and acquired the necessary
tools to design control systems using computer simulations.
3.6% 60.7% 3.6% 4.5 32.1% 28
Q29 Learned and utilized specific tools to design feedback controllers for
electro-mechanical systems.
3.6% 57.1% 3.6% 3.6% 4.4 32.1% 28
Q30 Learned about contemporary issues in the field of automatic control. 3.6% 42.9% 7.1% 7.1% 4.1 39.3% 28
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 7.1% 64.3% 7.1% 3.6% 4.3 17.9% 28
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 71.4% 3.6% 3.6% 4.7 21.4% 28
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 75.0% 3.6% 4.7 21.4% 28
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 75.0% 3.6% 3.6% 4.7 17.9% 28
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
64.3% 3.6% 4.6 32.1% 28
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 64.3% 3.6% 4.6 32.1% 28
A42 I have enhanced my knowledge of contemporary issues 46.4% 10.7% 4.4 42.9% 28
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
67.9% 4.7 32.1% 28
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 17130
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 3513: Measurement Systems
Response Rate: 28/41Primary Instructor: Lee,Sang-Hoon
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 28
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 28
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 89.3% 4.9 10.7% 28
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 78.6% 4.8 21.4% 28
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 60.7% 28.6% 4.3 10.7% 28
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 82.1% 3.6% 4.8 14.3% 28
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 60.7% 7.1% 4.5 32.1% 28
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 3.7% 40.7% 18.5% 18.5% 3.7 18.5% 27
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Acquired and applied instrumentation fundamentals to analyze and design
measurement instrumentation.
57.1% 3.6% 4.5 39.3% 28
Q28 Learned fundamental operational aspects of measurement instruments,
fundamentals of data acquisition hardware, and became able to appropriately
calibrate any given measurement device.
57.1% 3.6% 3.6% 4.5 35.7% 28
Q29 Utilized modern computer-aided analysis and design tools to perform
measurement system analysis and design.
53.6% 7.1% 7.1% 4.3 32.1% 28
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 53.6% 3.6% 4.5 42.9% 28
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 75.0% 7.1% 4.7 17.9% 28
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 28
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 3.6% 64.3% 4.5 32.1% 28
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 67.9% 4.7 32.1% 28
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to
analyze and interpret data
53.6% 3.6% 7.1% 4.4 35.7% 28
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
57.1% 7.1% 7.1% 4.4 28.6% 28
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
60.7% 3.6% 4.6 35.7% 28
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 23993
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 5913: Mechatronics
Response Rate: 15/15Primary Instructor: Lee,Sang-Hoon
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 6.7% 93.3% 15
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 15
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 66.7% 6.7% 4.5 26.7% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 6.7% 33.3% 6.7% 33.3% 3.7 20.0% 15
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 66.7% 6.7% 20.0% 4.5 6.7% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 46.7% 6.7% 4.4 46.7% 15
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 53.3% 20.0% 4.3 26.7% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 53.3% 13.3% 6.7% 4.2 26.7% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 73.3% 4.7 26.7% 15
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 73.3% 4.7 26.7% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17159
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 136: Communication Networks
Response Rate: 28/39Primary Instructor: Chao,Jonathan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 96.4% 3.6% 28
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 89.3% 10.7% 28
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 89.3% 3.6% 3.6% 4.9 3.6% 28
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 57.1% 14.3% 3.6% 10.7% 4.5 14.3% 28
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 32.1% 3.6% 17.9% 17.9% 3.8 28.6% 28
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 7.1% 32.1% 3.6% 3.6% 28.6% 3.7 25.0% 28
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 3.6% 35.7% 3.6% 3.6% 3.6% 4.1 50.0% 28
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 28.6% 3.6% 3.6% 21.4% 4.0 42.9% 28
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 28.6% 3.6% 14.3% 14.3% 3.9 39.3% 28
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.6% 50.0% 3.6% 3.6% 3.6% 4.3 35.7% 28
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 39.3% 3.6% 7.1% 10.7% 4.1 39.3% 28
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 3.6% 50.0% 3.6% 3.6% 14.3% 4.2 25.0% 28
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16903
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 9333: SEL TPCS IN TELECOMM & NTWK FROM INFO SYS
Response Rate: 23/27Primary Instructor: Chao,Jonathan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 4.3% 95.7% 23
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 21.7% 78.3% 23
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 69.6% 4.3% 4.6 26.1% 23
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 60.9% 13.0% 17.4% 4.2 8.7% 23
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 8.7% 26.1% 26.1% 8.7% 3.4 30.4% 23
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 43.5% 26.1% 4.3% 3.9 26.1% 23
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 47.8% 13.0% 4.3% 4.2 34.8% 23
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 52.2% 8.7% 4.3 39.1% 23
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 69.6% 4.3% 17.4% 4.4 8.7% 23
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 65.2% 13.0% 13.0% 4.3 8.7% 23
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
4.3% 60.9% 8.7% 13.0% 4.2 13.0% 23
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 52.2% 8.7% 13.0% 4.2 26.1% 23
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
65.2% 13.0% 13.0% 4.3 8.7% 23
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 52.2% 8.7% 13.0% 4.2 26.1% 23
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 56.5% 13.0% 8.7% 4.2 21.7% 23
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 56.5% 4.3% 17.4% 4.3 21.7% 23
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 47.8% 4.3% 34.8% 4.0 13.0% 23
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 4.3% 47.8% 8.7% 30.4% 3.9 8.7% 23
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 9.1% 50.0% 4.5% 9.1% 4.0 27.3% 22
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 8.7% 43.5% 8.7% 17.4% 3.8 21.7% 23
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.3% 26.1% 17.4% 4.3% 3.7 47.8% 23
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.3% 60.9% 4.3% 8.7% 4.3 21.7% 23
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 73.9% 8.7% 4.6 17.4% 23
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 56.5% 17.4% 4.3% 4.2 21.7% 23
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16265
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 8293: Construction Operations Analysis
Response Rate: 25/29Primary Instructor: Sehic,Adis
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 4.0% 96.0% 25
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 16.0% 84.0% 25
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 4.0% 44.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.2 44.0% 25
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 56.0% 16.0% 16.0% 4.1 12.0% 25
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.0% 36.0% 20.0% 8.0% 3.8 32.0% 25
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 8.0% 48.0% 20.0% 4.0 24.0% 25
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 8.0% 24.0% 16.0% 4.0% 3.6 48.0% 25
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.0% 28.0% 4.0% 16.0% 24.0% 3.6 24.0% 25
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.2% 29.2% 4.2% 16.7% 12.5% 3.7 33.3% 24
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 44.0% 28.0% 8.0% 3.8 20.0% 25
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 8.0% 48.0% 4.0% 20.0% 4.0% 3.8 16.0% 25
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 8.0% 28.0% 32.0% 4.0% 3.4 28.0% 25
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17554
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2121: General Physics Laboratory I
Response Rate: 30/32Primary Instructor: JANG,IN
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
80.0% 3.3% 4.8 16.7% 30
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 53.3% 3.3% 4.5 43.3% 30
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 83.3% 3.3% 6.7% 4.7 6.7% 30
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 86.7% 3.3% 4.8 10.0% 30
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 56.7% 13.3% 6.7% 4.2 23.3% 30
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 3.3% 6.7% 4.4 40.0% 30
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 3.3% 43.3% 16.7% 6.7% 3.9 30.0% 30
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 13.3% 40.0% 3.3% 3.3% 3.9 40.0% 30
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 6.7% 33.3% 6.7% 16.7% 13.3% 3.6 23.3% 30
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 73.3% 3.3% 3.3% 4.6 20.0% 30
Q40 Value was added to my education. 6.7% 36.7% 3.3% 16.7% 3.3% 3.8 33.3% 30
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 16.7% 30.0% 6.7% 16.7% 3.5 30.0% 30
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A06 I have enhanced my ability to analyze and interpret data appropriately. 6.7% 46.7% 3.3% 3.3% 4.2 40.0% 30
A17 I have enhanced my ability to conduct experiments to validate hypotheses and
theories.
6.7% 36.7% 3.3% 3.3% 4.1 50.0% 30
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: H
Class Number: 17567
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2131: General Physics Laboratory II
Response Rate: 26/32Primary Instructor: JANG,IN
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
3.8% 76.9% 3.8% 4.6 15.4% 26
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 3.8% 61.5% 3.8% 3.8% 4.4 26.9% 26
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 7.7% 73.1% 4.5 19.2% 26
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 3.8% 92.3% 4.8 3.8% 26
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 3.8% 53.8% 11.5% 3.8% 4.2 26.9% 26
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 11.5% 38.5% 7.7% 4.0 42.3% 26
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 3.8% 50.0% 7.7% 15.4% 4.1 23.1% 26
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 7.7% 34.6% 15.4% 19.2% 3.6 23.1% 26
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 7.7% 30.8% 11.5% 7.7% 3.8 42.3% 26
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 7.7% 69.2% 3.8% 4.4 19.2% 26
Q40 Value was added to my education. 7.7% 38.5% 15.4% 11.5% 3.7 26.9% 26
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 15.4% 30.8% 26.9% 7.7% 3.2 19.2% 26
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A06 I have enhanced my ability to analyze and interpret data appropriately. 4.3% 47.8% 4.3% 13.0% 4.1 30.4% 23
A17 I have enhanced my ability to conduct experiments to validate hypotheses and
theories.
8.7% 43.5% 4.3% 13.0% 4.0 30.4% 23
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17303
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 4983: SPECIAL TOPICS IN MECH ENGR
Response Rate: 58/63Primary Instructor: Sutton,Paul J.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 3.4% 87.9% 8.6% 58
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.4% 89.3% 5.4% 56
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 93.1% 4.9 6.9% 58
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 91.4% 3.4% 4.9 5.2% 58
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 82.8% 1.7% 8.6% 4.7 6.9% 58
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 82.8% 1.7% 1.7% 4.8 13.8% 58
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 79.3% 1.7% 1.7% 4.7 17.2% 58
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 62.1% 6.9% 1.7% 24.1% 4.4 5.2% 58
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learned the ethical considerations encountered by engineers involving intellectual
property
84.5% 4.8 15.5% 58
Q28 Learned about contracts and agreements involving intellectual property rights
which are routinely encountered by engineers.
82.8% 4.8 17.2% 58
Q29 Learned about effective communication of intellectual property ideas and
concepts.
82.8% 1.7% 4.8 15.5% 58
Q30 Understood the nature and value of intellectual property legal opinions. 86.2% 4.9 13.8% 58
Q31 Understood the value and benefits to be derived from past failures, and the use of
failure in achieving success.
82.8% 1.7% 4.8 15.5% 58
Q32 Learned about risk management and strategies for avoiding liability and illegality 75.9% 1.7% 4.7 22.4% 58
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 84.5% 3.4% 1.7% 4.8 10.3% 58
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 82.8% 1.7% 4.8 15.5% 58
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 94.8% 1.7% 4.9 3.4% 58
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 89.7% 1.7% 4.9 8.6% 58
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 21581
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 6123: Cinema Studio
Response Rate: 10/12Primary Instructor: Jones,Arthur
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 10.0% 90.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 10.0% 90.0% 10
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 70.0% 4.7 30.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 90.0% 10.0% 4.8 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 10.0% 4.4 40.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 10.0% 60.0% 10.0% 4.2 20.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 60.0% 10.0% 4.5 30.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 80.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.8 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 80.0% 20.0% 4.6 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16636
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 9223: SELECTED TOPICS IN CS
Response Rate: 38/50Primary Instructor: Sahu,Sambit
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 5.3% 94.7% 38
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 2.6% 97.4% 38
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 68.4% 7.9% 4.6 23.7% 38
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 2.6% 55.3% 15.8% 5.3% 4.1 21.1% 38
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 60.5% 5.3% 7.9% 4.4 26.3% 38
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 76.3% 4.8 23.7% 38
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 2.6% 63.2% 7.9% 4.4 26.3% 38
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 2.6% 60.5% 2.6% 7.9% 4.4 26.3% 38
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 60.5% 2.6% 5.3% 4.5 31.6% 38
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 76.3% 7.9% 5.3% 4.6 10.5% 38
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 2.6% 73.7% 7.9% 10.5% 4.4 5.3% 38
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 81.6% 7.9% 5.3% 4.6 5.3% 38
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 23131
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6191: Coaching in Organizations
Response Rate: 11/19Primary Instructor: Conte,Vincent
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 11
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 11
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 63.6% 4.6 36.4% 11
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 54.5% 18.2% 4.4 27.3% 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 45.5% 18.2% 4.3 36.4% 11
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 54.5% 45.5% 4.1 11
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 63.6% 4.6 36.4% 11
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 54.5% 9.1% 4.5 36.4% 11
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 36.4% 9.1% 4.3 54.5% 11
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
54.5% 9.1% 4.5 36.4% 11
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
45.5% 18.2% 4.3 36.4% 11
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
72.7% 4.7 27.3% 11
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 54.5% 9.1% 9.1% 4.5 27.3% 11
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 72.7% 4.7 27.3% 11
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 63.6% 4.6 36.4% 11
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 36.4% 9.1% 4.3 54.5% 11
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16703
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6361: MANAGING BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING
Response Rate: 2/5Primary Instructor: Conte,Vincent
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 2
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 2
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 2
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 2
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 2
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 2
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 2
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 2
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 100.0% 5.0 2
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
100.0% 5.0 2
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
100.0% 5.0 2
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
100.0% 5.0 2
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 50.0% 3.5 2
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 2
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 2
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: LVL1
Class Number: 16770
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6361: MANAGING BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING
Response Rate: 5/11Primary Instructor: Conte,Vincent
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 16.7% 83.3% 6
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 6
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 6
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 83.3% 16.7% 4.5 6
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
66.7% 16.7% 4.3 16.7% 6
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 6
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
50.0% 4.5 50.0% 6
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
100.0% 5.0 6
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 100.0% 5.0 6
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 33.3% 50.0% 3.8 16.7% 6
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 50.0% 33.3% 4.2 16.7% 6
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 6
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 16.7% 66.7% 4.2 16.7% 6
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 16.7% 50.0% 16.7% 3.7 16.7% 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: LVL1
Class Number: 16770
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6361: MANAGING BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING
Response Rate: 5/11Primary Instructor: Conte,Vincent
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 66.7% 16.7% 4.3 16.7% 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 17700
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 4793: Computer Networking
Response Rate: 40/56Primary Instructor: Zhao,Zhengxue
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 40
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 39
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.0% 2.5% 2.5% 4.8 10.0% 40
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 75.0% 2.5% 2.5% 5.0% 4.7 15.0% 40
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 2.5% 67.5% 5.0% 5.0% 4.5 20.0% 40
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 2.5% 77.5% 2.5% 5.0% 4.6 12.5% 40
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 2.5% 72.5% 5.0% 4.6 20.0% 40
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 2.5% 80.0% 2.5% 4.7 15.0% 40
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I am comfortable using network tools such as Wireshark to measure and monitor
network performance
3.1% 59.4% 4.5 37.5% 32
Q28 I am comfortable with describing Internet protocol structure including the
application layer, transport layer, network layer and link layers.
3.1% 50.0% 3.1% 4.4 43.8% 32
Q29 I am comfortable with the configuration and operation of the network layer
including forwarding, router architecture, the IP protocol and routing protocols
including OSPF and BGP.
3.1% 40.6% 6.3% 3.1% 4.2 46.9% 32
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 2.5% 62.5% 2.5% 4.6 32.5% 40
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 2.5% 77.5% 2.5% 4.7 17.5% 40
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 2.5% 75.0% 2.5% 2.5% 4.7 17.5% 40
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 2.5% 75.0% 2.5% 4.6 20.0% 40
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 16709
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6843: Computer Networking
Response Rate: 40/56Primary Instructor: Zhao,Zhengxue
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 40
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 39
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.0% 2.5% 2.5% 4.8 10.0% 40
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 75.0% 2.5% 2.5% 5.0% 4.7 15.0% 40
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 2.5% 67.5% 5.0% 5.0% 4.5 20.0% 40
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 2.5% 77.5% 2.5% 5.0% 4.6 12.5% 40
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 2.5% 72.5% 5.0% 4.6 20.0% 40
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 2.5% 80.0% 2.5% 4.7 15.0% 40
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I am comfortable using network tools such as Wireshark to measure and monitor
network performance
3.1% 59.4% 4.5 37.5% 32
Q28 I am comfortable with describing Internet protocol structure including the
application layer, transport layer, network layer and link layers.
3.1% 50.0% 3.1% 4.4 43.8% 32
Q29 I am comfortable with the configuration and operation of the network layer
including forwarding, router architecture, the IP protocol and routing protocols
including OSPF and BGP.
3.1% 40.6% 6.3% 3.1% 4.2 46.9% 32
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 2.5% 62.5% 2.5% 4.6 32.5% 40
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 2.5% 77.5% 2.5% 4.7 17.5% 40
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 2.5% 75.0% 2.5% 2.5% 4.7 17.5% 40
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 2.5% 75.0% 2.5% 4.6 20.0% 40
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: ILEC
Class Number: 16311
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 5373: INTERNET ARCHITECTURE & PROTOCOLS
Response Rate: 52/70Primary Instructor: Zhao,Zhengxue
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 1.9% 96.2% 1.9% 52
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 1.9% 96.2% 1.9% 52
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 70.6% 3.9% 2.0% 5.9% 4.6 17.6% 51
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 74.5% 3.9% 3.9% 7.8% 4.6 9.8% 51
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 56.9% 5.9% 7.8% 9.8% 4.3 19.6% 51
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 53.8% 1.9% 3.8% 15.4% 4.3 25.0% 52
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 63.5% 3.8% 3.8% 4.6 28.8% 52
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 1.9% 59.6% 3.8% 9.6% 4.5 25.0% 52
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 28.8% 3.8% 7.7% 17.3% 4.0 42.3% 52
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 59.6% 1.9% 9.6% 4.5 28.8% 52
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 67.3% 1.9% 11.5% 4.6 19.2% 52
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 65.4% 1.9% 3.8% 5.8% 4.5 23.1% 52
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17502
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
HI 3304: SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY AS A STRATEGIC RESOURCE IN WORLD WAR II
Response Rate: 14/15Primary Instructor: Sviedrys,Romualdas
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 35.7% 50.0% 14.3% 14
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 28.6% 64.3% 7.1% 14
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 14
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 42.9% 4.4 57.1% 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 42.9% 4.4 57.1% 14
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 42.9% 7.1% 4.3 50.0% 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 64.3% 7.1% 4.6 28.6% 14
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 71.4% 7.1% 4.6 21.4% 14
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have enhanced my ability to understand and demonstrate the relationship
between content of scientific and technological knowledge, and the social and
intellectual context in which it is created.
69.2% 4.7 30.8% 13
Q28 I have enhanced my ability to understand and demonstrate how social processes
frame scientific and technological enterprises, including theory construction,
invention, and innovation.
53.8% 4.5 46.2% 13
Q29 I have enhanced my ability to understand and demonstrate how science and
technology shape society (in historical, philosophical, sociological, cultural and
technical ways).
69.2% 15.4% 4.8 15.4% 13
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 7.1% 21.4% 14.3% 21.4% 3.5 35.7% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 7.1% 4.4 42.9% 14
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 42.9% 14.3% 4.3 42.9% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 7.1% 4.4 42.9% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16212
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 8673: Technology Strategy
Response Rate: 29/37Primary Instructor: Noveck,Beth S.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 17.2% 79.3% 3.4% 29
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 10.7% 85.7% 3.6% 28
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 62.1% 3.4% 3.4% 10.3% 4.5 20.7% 29
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 58.6% 6.9% 3.4% 4.6 31.0% 29
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 65.5% 3.4% 10.3% 4.6 20.7% 29
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 6.9% 41.4% 10.3% 10.3% 4.0 31.0% 29
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 6.9% 37.9% 3.4% 10.3% 4.1 41.4% 29
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 6.9% 31.0% 3.4% 6.9% 17.2% 3.8 34.5% 29
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 3.4% 41.4% 3.4% 3.4% 3.4% 4.2 44.8% 29
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
6.9% 34.5% 6.9% 3.4% 13.8% 3.9 34.5% 29
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
6.9% 34.5% 3.4% 3.4% 10.3% 4.0 41.4% 29
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
3.4% 34.5% 3.4% 3.4% 4.2 55.2% 29
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 6.9% 41.4% 6.9% 6.9% 6.9% 4.0 31.0% 29
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.4% 44.8% 3.4% 6.9% 6.9% 4.1 34.5% 29
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 6.9% 51.7% 3.4% 6.9% 13.8% 4.0 17.2% 29
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 10.3% 51.7% 3.4% 3.4% 10.3% 4.0 20.7% 29
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: MOT2
Class Number: 16813
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 9503: MOT Capstone Project Course
Response Rate: 14/17Primary Instructor: Noveck,Beth S.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 14.3% 85.7% 14
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 35.7% 42.9% 21.4% 14
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 78.6% 4.8 21.4% 14
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 78.6% 14.3% 4.9 7.1% 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 64.3% 7.1% 7.1% 4.6 21.4% 14
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 57.1% 7.1% 7.1% 7.1% 4.4 21.4% 14
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 7.1% 50.0% 14.3% 4.1 28.6% 14
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
50.0% 4.5 50.0% 14
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
57.1% 7.1% 14.3% 4.3 21.4% 14
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
64.3% 4.6 35.7% 14
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 7.1% 71.4% 7.1% 4.4 14.3% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 57.1% 7.1% 7.1% 4.4 28.6% 14
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 57.1% 14.3% 4.4 28.6% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 57.1% 14.3% 21.4% 4.1 7.1% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17524
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
EN 2114W: MACHINES MADE OF WORDS I: POETRY AS DESIGN
Response Rate: 7/15Primary Instructor: Nadler,Alan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 14.3% 85.7% 7
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 28.6% 71.4% 7
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 71.4% 14.3% 4.4 14.3% 7
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 71.4% 14.3% 4.4 14.3% 7
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 57.1% 4.6 42.9% 7
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 14.3% 42.9% 14.3% 3.7 28.6% 7
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 14.3% 42.9% 14.3% 28.6% 3.7 7
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have enhanced my ability to effectively communicate including being able to give
oral presentations that increase knowledge, foster understanding, or encourage
change.
14.3% 57.1% 4.1 28.6% 7
Q28 I have enhanced by ability to read effectively, including being able to extract and to
create meaning from the written texts.
50.0% 16.7% 4.3 33.3% 6
Q29 I developed perspectives of the humanities and social sciences to bear within
technical discourse.
16.7% 50.0% 4.0 33.3% 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 57.1% 14.3% 14.3% 4.3 14.3% 7
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 14.3% 71.4% 14.3% 4.0 7
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 16.7% 66.7% 16.7% 4.0 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 16.7% 50.0% 16.7% 3.7 16.7% 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17526
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
EN 2334W: THE INVENTION OF THE WORD
Response Rate: 6/9Primary Instructor: Nadler,Alan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 6
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 33.3% 4.2 16.7% 6
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have enhanced my ability to effectively communicate including being able to give
oral presentations that increase knowledge, foster understanding, or encourage
change.
50.0% 33.3% 4.2 16.7% 6
Q28 I have enhanced by ability to read effectively, including being able to extract and to
create meaning from the written texts.
66.7% 16.7% 4.5 16.7% 6
Q29 I developed perspectives of the humanities and social sciences to bear within
technical discourse.
50.0% 16.7% 16.7% 4.4 16.7% 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 16.7% 4.2 50.0% 6
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 66.7% 16.7% 4.5 16.7% 6
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 66.7% 16.7% 4.5 16.7% 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17528
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
EN 3144W: FORMAL APPROACHES TO ART & POETRY
Response Rate: 10/15Primary Instructor: Nadler,Alan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 10
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 10
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 80.0% 10.0% 4.6 10.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 30.0% 10.0% 30.0% 4.0 30.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 10.0% 40.0% 10.0% 4.0 40.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 40.0% 10.0% 4.2 50.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16288
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6813: Information, Security and Privacy
Response Rate: 6/8Primary Instructor: Yan,Lok K
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 6
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 66.7% 16.7% 4.3 16.7% 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 16.7% 2.8 33.3% 6
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 16.7% 16.7% 50.0% 2.7 16.7% 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 6
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 16.7% 16.7% 33.3% 3.3 33.3% 6
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 33.3% 16.7% 4.2 50.0% 6
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 16.7% 33.3% 16.7% 3.5 33.3% 6
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
50.0% 16.7% 4.3 33.3% 6
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 33.3% 16.7% 4.2 50.0% 6
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
16.7% 33.3% 16.7% 16.7% 3.3 16.7% 6
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 33.3% 16.7% 16.7% 2.8 33.3% 6
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 83.3% 16.7% 1.7 6
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 16.7% 83.3% 3.3 6
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 16.7% 83.3% 3.3 6
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 16.7% 83.3% 3.3 6
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 66.7% 16.7% 4.3 16.7% 6
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 83.3% 16.7% 1.7 6
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 16.7% 33.3% 16.7% 3.7 33.3% 6
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 50.0% 16.7% 16.7% 2.3 16.7% 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 16.7% 16.7% 4.0 16.7% 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: BK04
Class Number: 23722
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 3943: SPECIAL TOPICS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE
Response Rate: 28/31Primary Instructor: Chunara,Rumi
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 96.4% 3.6% 28
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 3.7% 96.3% 27
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 78.6% 4.8 21.4% 28
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 78.6% 3.6% 4.8 17.9% 28
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 46.4% 14.3% 7.1% 4.1 32.1% 28
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 28
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 67.9% 3.6% 4.6 28.6% 28
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 7.1% 4.4 42.9% 28
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 29.6% 18.5% 18.5% 3.7 33.3% 27
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 71.4% 7.1% 4.6 21.4% 28
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 67.9% 3.6% 4.6 28.6% 28
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 71.4% 7.1% 4.6 21.4% 28
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: E
Class Number: 16823
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 9223: SELECTED TOPICS IN CS
Response Rate: 28/31Primary Instructor: Chunara,Rumi
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 96.4% 3.6% 28
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 3.7% 96.3% 27
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 78.6% 4.8 21.4% 28
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 78.6% 3.6% 4.8 17.9% 28
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 46.4% 14.3% 7.1% 4.1 32.1% 28
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 28
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 67.9% 3.6% 4.6 28.6% 28
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 7.1% 4.4 42.9% 28
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 29.6% 18.5% 18.5% 3.7 33.3% 27
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 71.4% 7.1% 4.6 21.4% 28
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 67.9% 3.6% 4.6 28.6% 28
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 71.4% 7.1% 4.6 21.4% 28
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16274
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BT 6013: Biotechnology and the Pharmaceutical Industry
Response Rate: 30/37Primary Instructor: Vulfson,Evgeny
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 30
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 96.6% 3.4% 29
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 86.7% 3.3% 4.8 10.0% 30
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 30
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 86.7% 4.9 13.3% 30
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 66.7% 3.3% 4.6 30.0% 30
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 90.0% 3.3% 4.8 6.7% 30
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 76.7% 3.3% 6.7% 4.6 13.3% 30
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 56.7% 3.3% 6.7% 4.4 33.3% 30
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.3% 93.3% 4.8 3.3% 30
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 3.3% 80.0% 3.3% 4.6 13.3% 30
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 3.3% 90.0% 4.8 6.7% 30
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16277
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BTE 6043: Biocatalysis in Industry
Response Rate: 32/34Primary Instructor: Vulfson,Evgeny
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 32
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 32
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 32
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 84.4% 9.4% 4.8 6.3% 32
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 71.9% 9.4% 9.4% 4.4 9.4% 32
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 71.9% 3.1% 3.1% 9.4% 4.6 12.5% 32
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 71.9% 6.3% 6.3% 4.5 15.6% 32
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 71.9% 3.1% 6.3% 4.6 18.8% 32
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 3.1% 62.5% 3.1% 3.1% 4.4 28.1% 32
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 71.9% 6.3% 4.6 21.9% 32
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 81.3% 6.3% 3.1% 4.7 9.4% 32
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 68.8% 9.4% 3.1% 4.5 18.8% 32
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 23734
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 4983: SPECIAL TOPICS IN MECH ENGR
Response Rate: 20/20Primary Instructor: Clarke,Anthony
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 95.0% 5.0% 20
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 19
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 20
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 20
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 85.0% 5.0% 4.8 10.0% 20
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 90.0% 10.0% 4.8 20
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 65.0% 5.0% 4.6 30.0% 20
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 63.2% 10.5% 5.3% 4.4 21.1% 19
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learned the ethical considerations encountered by engineers involving intellectual
property
68.4% 5.3% 4.6 26.3% 19
Q28 Learned about contracts and agreements involving intellectual property rights
which are routinely encountered by engineers.
63.2% 10.5% 15.8% 4.3 10.5% 19
Q29 Learned about effective communication of intellectual property ideas and
concepts.
68.4% 15.8% 10.5% 4.3 5.3% 19
Q30 Understood the nature and value of intellectual property legal opinions. 63.2% 5.3% 5.3% 15.8% 4.4 10.5% 19
Q31 Understood the value and benefits to be derived from past failures, and the use of
failure in achieving success.
88.9% 5.6% 4.8 5.6% 18
Q32 Learned about risk management and strategies for avoiding liability and illegality 73.7% 15.8% 4.6 10.5% 19
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 10.0% 65.0% 5.0% 4.3 20.0% 20
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 20
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 20
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 5.0% 85.0% 4.7 10.0% 20
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17196
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 3153: Geotechnical Engineering
Response Rate: 31/35Primary Instructor: Suescun Florez,Eduardo Alfonso
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 30
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 6.5% 93.5% 31
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 26.7% 16.7% 13.3% 3.8 43.3% 30
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 6.7% 53.3% 16.7% 4.2 23.3% 30
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 20.7% 10.3% 20.7% 13.8% 2.9 34.5% 29
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 23.3% 16.7% 3.3% 16.7% 13.3% 3.0 26.7% 30
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 13.3% 30.0% 13.3% 10.0% 3.5 33.3% 30
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 6.9% 37.9% 20.7% 3.4% 3.7 31.0% 29
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I can understand the basic principles of soil mechanics and foundation Engineering. 3.2% 22.6% 12.9% 6.5% 3.8 54.8% 31
Q28 I have developed the knowledge of relationships and classifications of soils. 19.4% 6.5% 9.7% 4.0 64.5% 31
Q29 I have developed the knowledge of permeability, effective stress, seepage and
consolidation of soil.
25.0% 14.3% 17.9% 3.8 42.9% 28
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 6.7% 30.0% 20.0% 6.7% 3.6 36.7% 30
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 20.0% 23.3% 13.3% 13.3% 3.2 30.0% 30
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 13.8% 31.0% 27.6% 10.3% 3.2 17.2% 29
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 16.7% 26.7% 13.3% 16.7% 3.3 26.7% 30
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
3.2% 16.1% 6.5% 9.7% 3.8 64.5% 31
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 9.7% 29.0% 16.1% 3.4 45.2% 31
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
6.5% 16.1% 12.9% 16.1% 3.5 48.4% 31
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: ALAB
Class Number: 17197
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 3153: Geotechnical Engineering
Response Rate: 9/11Primary Instructor: Suescun Florez,Eduardo Alfonso
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 22.2% 33.3% 11.1% 11.1% 3.3 22.2% 9
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 55.6% 11.1% 4.6 33.3% 9
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 33.3% 11.1% 22.2% 3.9 33.3% 9
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 22.2% 22.2% 22.2% 22.2% 2.9 11.1% 9
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 44.4% 11.1% 11.1% 4.1 33.3% 9
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 44.4% 11.1% 4.3 44.4% 9
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I can understand the basic principles of soil mechanics and foundation Engineering. 44.4% 11.1% 11.1% 4.1 33.3% 9
Q28 I have developed the knowledge of relationships and classifications of soils. 55.6% 11.1% 4.4 33.3% 9
Q29 I have developed the knowledge of permeability, effective stress, seepage and
consolidation of soil.
33.3% 11.1% 11.1% 4.0 44.4% 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 55.6% 22.2% 4.3 22.2% 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 9
Q40 Value was added to my education. 55.6% 11.1% 4.4 33.3% 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 44.4% 11.1% 4.3 44.4% 9
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
44.4% 11.1% 11.1% 4.1 33.3% 9
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 44.4% 11.1% 11.1% 4.1 33.3% 9
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
55.6% 22.2% 4.3 22.2% 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: BLAB
Class Number: 17198
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 3153: Geotechnical Engineering
Response Rate: 12/13Primary Instructor: Suescun Florez,Eduardo Alfonso
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
66.7% 16.7% 4.3 16.7% 12
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 8.3% 25.0% 33.3% 8.3% 3.3 25.0% 12
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 58.3% 8.3% 4.4 33.3% 12
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 41.7% 4.4 58.3% 12
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 25.0% 8.3% 4.1 66.7% 12
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 16.7% 25.0% 25.0% 8.3% 3.2 25.0% 12
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 33.3% 8.3% 4.2 58.3% 12
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 8.3% 25.0% 16.7% 8.3% 3.6 41.7% 12
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I can understand the basic principles of soil mechanics and foundation Engineering. 25.0% 4.3 75.0% 12
Q28 I have developed the knowledge of relationships and classifications of soils. 8.3% 25.0% 4.0 66.7% 12
Q29 I have developed the knowledge of permeability, effective stress, seepage and
consolidation of soil.
33.3% 4.3 66.7% 12
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 12
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 50.0% 16.7% 4.3 33.3% 12
Q40 Value was added to my education. 33.3% 8.3% 4.3 58.3% 12
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 41.7% 16.7% 4.3 41.7% 12
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
25.0% 4.3 75.0% 12
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 33.3% 25.0% 8.3% 3.8 33.3% 12
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
41.7% 8.3% 4.3 50.0% 12
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: CLAB
Class Number: 17374
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 3153: Geotechnical Engineering
Response Rate: 11/11Primary Instructor: Suescun Florez,Eduardo Alfonso
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
63.6% 9.1% 4.5 27.3% 11
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 18.2% 18.2% 45.5% 2.7 18.2% 11
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 63.6% 9.1% 4.5 27.3% 11
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 63.6% 9.1% 4.5 27.3% 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 45.5% 4.5 54.5% 11
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 18.2% 9.1% 18.2% 9.1% 3.1 45.5% 11
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 9.1% 36.4% 9.1% 9.1% 3.8 36.4% 11
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 9.1% 54.5% 18.2% 3.9 18.2% 11
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I can understand the basic principles of soil mechanics and foundation Engineering. 9.1% 45.5% 4.2 45.5% 11
Q28 I have developed the knowledge of relationships and classifications of soils. 45.5% 4.5 54.5% 11
Q29 I have developed the knowledge of permeability, effective stress, seepage and
consolidation of soil.
45.5% 4.5 54.5% 11
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 45.5% 4.5 54.5% 11
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 72.7% 9.1% 4.5 18.2% 11
Q40 Value was added to my education. 54.5% 4.5 45.5% 11
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 45.5% 9.1% 4.4 45.5% 11
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
45.5% 9.1% 4.4 45.5% 11
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 9.1% 36.4% 9.1% 18.2% 3.7 27.3% 11
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
54.5% 9.1% 9.1% 4.3 27.3% 11
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17026
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 1002: FOUNDATIONS OF MANAGEMENT
Response Rate: 21/32Primary Instructor: Nelson,Carl
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 42.9% 52.4% 4.8% 21
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 71.4% 19.0% 9.5% 21
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 28.6% 4.8% 14.3% 14.3% 3.9 38.1% 21
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 5.0% 15.0% 50.0% 5.0% 3.0 25.0% 20
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.8% 28.6% 14.3% 19.0% 3.7 33.3% 21
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 33.3% 14.3% 23.8% 19.0% 2.5 9.5% 21
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 19.0% 9.5% 4.8% 23.8% 14.3% 2.9 28.6% 21
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 9.5% 23.8% 23.8% 9.5% 3.4 33.3% 21
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 5.3% 42.1% 10.5% 15.8% 3.9 26.3% 19
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
5.3% 26.3% 10.5% 26.3% 3.6 31.6% 19
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
5.3% 26.3% 10.5% 26.3% 3.6 31.6% 19
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
5.3% 52.6% 5.3% 10.5% 4.2 26.3% 19
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 19.0% 14.3% 33.3% 3.6 33.3% 21
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 14.3% 23.8% 14.3% 19.0% 3.3 28.6% 21
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 14.3% 28.6% 4.8% 23.8% 14.3% 3.2 14.3% 21
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 19.0% 23.8% 4.8% 9.5% 19.0% 3.3 23.8% 21
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17029
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 3002: Project Management
Response Rate: 7/13Primary Instructor: Nelson,Carl
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 42.9% 57.1% 7
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 28.6% 71.4% 7
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 71.4% 14.3% 4.6 14.3% 7
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 42.9% 14.3% 28.6% 3.9 14.3% 7
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 42.9% 4.4 57.1% 7
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 42.9% 14.3% 4.1 42.9% 7
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 28.6% 4.3 71.4% 7
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 42.9% 14.3% 4.1 42.9% 7
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
57.1% 4.6 42.9% 7
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
57.1% 4.6 42.9% 7
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 28.6% 14.3% 4.1 57.1% 7
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 42.9% 14.3% 4.3 42.9% 7
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 57.1% 14.3% 4.4 28.6% 7
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 57.1% 14.3% 4.4 28.6% 7
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17478
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 1113: Audio Foundation Studio
Response Rate: 17/18Primary Instructor: Schumacher,Michael J
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 11.8% 82.4% 5.9% 17
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 47.1% 41.2% 11.8% 17
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 64.7% 5.9% 4.6 29.4% 17
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 35.3% 11.8% 4.1 52.9% 17
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 5.9% 29.4% 17.6% 17.6% 3.6 29.4% 17
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 41.2% 11.8% 23.5% 3.9 23.5% 17
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 29.4% 17.6% 5.9% 3.9 47.1% 17
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 11.8% 41.2% 35.3% 3.7 11.8% 17
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 47.1% 23.5% 17.6% 3.8 11.8% 17
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 52.9% 5.9% 5.9% 4.4 35.3% 17
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 5.9% 41.2% 5.9% 17.6% 3.9 29.4% 17
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 41.2% 11.8% 11.8% 4.1 35.3% 17
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 23791
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 1113: Audio Foundation Studio
Response Rate: 10/17Primary Instructor: Schumacher,Michael J
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 20.0% 70.0% 10.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 44.4% 55.6% 9
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 50.0% 20.0% 4.3 30.0% 10
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 20.0% 10.0% 30.0% 3.7 40.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.6 40.0% 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 10.0% 4.4 40.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 20.0% 30.0% 3.9 50.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 30.0% 10.0% 40.0% 3.7 20.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 20.0% 20.0% 10.0% 3.7 50.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 30.0% 10.0% 4.1 60.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 30.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.7 30.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 30.0% 10.0% 20.0% 3.9 40.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16725
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6103: Corporate Finance
Response Rate: 13/17Primary Instructor: Xu,Zhaoxia
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 13
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 92.3% 7.7% 13
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 84.6% 4.8 15.4% 13
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 76.9% 7.7% 4.7 15.4% 13
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 92.3% 7.7% 4.8 13
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 92.3% 7.7% 4.8 13
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 76.9% 4.8 23.1% 13
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 76.9% 4.8 23.1% 13
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 53.8% 7.7% 7.7% 4.3 30.8% 13
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 92.3% 4.9 7.7% 13
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 84.6% 4.8 15.4% 13
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 84.6% 7.7% 4.7 7.7% 13
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 16934
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6273: VALUATIONS & CORPORATE FINANCE
Response Rate: 4/4Primary Instructor: Xu,Zhaoxia
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 4
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 4
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 4
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 4
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 4
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 4
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 4
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 4
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 4
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 4
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16303
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CBE 6333: Transport Phenomena
Response Rate: 15/20Primary Instructor: Levicky,Rastislav
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 15
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 15
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 93.3% 4.9 6.7% 15
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 93.3% 4.9 6.7% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 15
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 73.3% 13.3% 4.6 13.3% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 13.3% 6.7% 4.0 46.7% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 66.7% 6.7% 4.5 26.7% 15
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 93.3% 4.9 6.7% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 66.7% 6.7% 4.5 26.7% 15
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 73.3% 6.7% 4.6 20.0% 15
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
6.7% 46.7% 6.7% 4.2 40.0% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: BKLN
Class Number: 17280
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 3113: INTRO TO GAME PROGRAMMING
Response Rate: 21/33Primary Instructor: Safrin,Ivan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 21
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 95.2% 4.8% 21
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 95.2% 5.0 4.8% 21
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 81.0% 9.5% 4.7 9.5% 21
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 9.5% 14.3% 9.5% 14.3% 3.5 52.4% 21
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 71.4% 4.8% 4.7 23.8% 21
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 81.0% 4.8 19.0% 21
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 42.9% 4.8% 47.6% 4.0 4.8% 21
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 52.4% 9.5% 4.4 38.1% 21
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 90.5% 4.9 9.5% 21
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 21
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 90.5% 4.9 9.5% 21
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: K2
Class Number: 17050
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 1424: Integrated Calculus II for Engineers
Response Rate: 1/25Primary Instructor: Lo,Tsz Chung
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 1
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 1
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 1
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 2.0 1
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.0 100.0% 1
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
100.0% 5.0 1
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q29 I need more HW problems. 100.0% 1.0 1
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.0 100.0% 1
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16936
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6871: R in Finance
Response Rate: 14/20Primary Instructor: Pawlowski,Jerzy
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
57.1% 4.6 42.9% 14
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 78.6% 4.8 21.4% 14
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 57.1% 4.6 42.9% 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 42.9% 7.1% 50.0% 1.8 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 28.6% 4.3 71.4% 14
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 64.3% 4.6 35.7% 14
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 50.0% 7.1% 4.4 42.9% 14
Q40 Value was added to my education. 57.1% 7.1% 4.5 35.7% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 57.1% 7.1% 4.5 35.7% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16779
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 7241: ALGORITHMIC PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
Response Rate: 16/15Primary Instructor: Pawlowski,Jerzy
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 16
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 16
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 43.8% 6.3% 4.4 50.0% 16
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 60.0% 13.3% 4.5 26.7% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 25.0% 6.3% 31.3% 18.8% 2.5 18.8% 16
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 37.5% 6.3% 31.3% 3.9 25.0% 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 56.3% 12.5% 4.4 31.3% 16
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 68.8% 4.7 31.3% 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 37.5% 6.3% 43.8% 3.8 12.5% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 56.3% 6.3% 4.6 37.5% 16
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 43.8% 31.3% 4.1 25.0% 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 43.8% 6.3% 4.4 50.0% 16
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17083
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 4043: Sustainable Cities
Response Rate: 11/25Primary Instructor: Cantos,Wilmer
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 10
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 45.5% 9.1% 18.2% 4.1 27.3% 11
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 45.5% 18.2% 4.3 36.4% 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 27.3% 36.4% 18.2% 3.4 18.2% 11
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 27.3% 27.3% 3.7 45.5% 11
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 18.2% 36.4% 9.1% 27.3% 3.4 9.1% 11
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 36.4% 9.1% 54.5% 3.6 11
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I can identify urban infrastructure challenges in a sector (e.g. water management,
congestion, safety and security of infrastructure)
50.0% 10.0% 4.3 40.0% 10
Q28 I know how to prepare, analyze and recommend potential for solutions for urban
infrastructure challenges
30.0% 10.0% 4.2 60.0% 10
Q29 I understand urban sustainability impact of deployed strategies 50.0% 10.0% 4.3 40.0% 10
Q30 I understand the role of Innovative Technology 10.0% 30.0% 4.0 60.0% 10
Q31 I can apply principles of disaster resilience and software application 40.0% 10.0% 4.2 50.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 18.2% 27.3% 18.2% 9.1% 3.3 27.3% 11
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 36.4% 9.1% 18.2% 4.0 36.4% 11
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 9.1% 45.5% 18.2% 18.2% 3.6 9.1% 11
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 27.3% 27.3% 27.3% 3.5 18.2% 11
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16611
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
IE 6113: Quality Control and Improvement
Response Rate: 27/28Primary Instructor: Ikhmeis,Sufian
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 27
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 27
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 3.7% 59.3% 3.7% 3.7% 4.4 29.6% 27
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 7.4% 66.7% 3.7% 4.4 22.2% 27
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 7.4% 51.9% 11.1% 11.1% 4.0 18.5% 27
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 63.0% 7.4% 4.6 29.6% 27
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 66.7% 3.7% 3.7% 4.6 25.9% 27
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 73.1% 3.8% 4.7 23.1% 26
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 3.7% 63.0% 18.5% 4.3 14.8% 27
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
51.9% 14.8% 4.4 33.3% 27
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
55.6% 7.4% 4.5 37.0% 27
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
63.0% 14.8% 4.5 22.2% 27
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 48.1% 3.7% 7.4% 4.3 40.7% 27
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 70.4% 3.7% 4.6 25.9% 27
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 63.0% 7.4% 7.4% 4.4 22.2% 27
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 59.3% 7.4% 7.4% 4.4 25.9% 27
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16565
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
IE 6823: Factory Simulation
Response Rate: 19/27Primary Instructor: Ikhmeis,Sufian
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 5.3% 94.7% 19
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.6% 94.4% 18
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 63.2% 10.5% 4.5 26.3% 19
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 63.2% 21.1% 4.2 15.8% 19
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 5.3% 52.6% 5.3% 5.3% 4.2 31.6% 19
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 73.7% 10.5% 4.6 15.8% 19
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 68.4% 15.8% 4.5 15.8% 19
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 57.9% 5.3% 4.5 36.8% 19
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 68.4% 10.5% 4.6 21.1% 19
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
68.4% 5.3% 4.6 26.3% 19
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
68.4% 5.3% 5.3% 4.5 21.1% 19
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
78.9% 5.3% 5.3% 4.6 10.5% 19
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 52.6% 5.3% 5.3% 4.4 36.8% 19
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 78.9% 5.3% 4.7 15.8% 19
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 5.3% 73.7% 10.5% 4.4 10.5% 19
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 5.3% 84.2% 5.3% 4.6 5.3% 19
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: ALEC
Class Number: 17084
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 4092: Leadership, Business Principles, Policy and Ethics in Civil Engineering
Response Rate: 27/37Primary Instructor: Griffis,Fletcher
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 96.3% 3.7% 27
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 27
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 27
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 74.1% 11.1% 4.6 14.8% 27
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 66.7% 3.7% 4.6 29.6% 27
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 63.0% 3.7% 3.7% 4.5 29.6% 27
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 66.7% 7.4% 3.7% 4.5 22.2% 27
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 44.4% 3.7% 3.7% 37.0% 4.0 11.1% 27
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I can apply the ASCE Code of Ethics to the solution of ethical problems confronting
a practicing engineer.
63.0% 3.7% 4.6 33.3% 27
Q28 I can explain the elements of project management in the public service and private
sectors.
63.0% 7.4% 4.6 29.6% 27
Q29 I can demonstrate an appreciation of the challenges facing civil engineers in current
professional practice.
70.4% 11.1% 4.6 18.5% 27
Q30 I can develop short-term and long-term professional goals, to include consideration
of continuing education and professional registration.
70.4% 7.4% 4.6 22.2% 27
Q31 I can communicate effectively in writing. 59.3% 3.7% 18.5% 4.3 18.5% 27
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 70.4% 7.4% 4.6 22.2% 27
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.7% 70.4% 7.4% 4.5 18.5% 27
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 81.5% 7.4% 4.7 11.1% 27
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 3.7% 70.4% 7.4% 4.5 18.5% 27
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A38 I have enhanced my ability to develop an understanding of professional and ethical
responsibility
77.8% 3.7% 3.7% 4.7 14.8% 27
A40 I have enhanced my ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
global and societal context
74.1% 3.7% 3.7% 4.6 18.5% 27
A41 I have enhanced my ability to develop a recognition of the need for, and an ability
to engage in life-long learning
74.1% 7.4% 3.7% 4.6 14.8% 27
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 74.1% 3.7% 3.7% 4.6 18.5% 27
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: AREC
Class Number: 17088
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 4092: Leadership, Business Principles, Policy and Ethics in Civil Engineering
Response Rate: 26/37Primary Instructor: Griffis,Fletcher
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 8.0% 72.0% 20.0% 25
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 8.0% 72.0% 20.0% 25
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 53.8% 7.7% 23.1% 4.3 15.4% 26
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 42.3% 11.5% 30.8% 4.1 15.4% 26
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 19.2% 19.2% 53.8% 3.6 7.7% 26
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 19.2% 19.2% 53.8% 3.6 7.7% 26
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 38.5% 7.7% 7.7% 23.1% 4.0 23.1% 26
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 23.1% 19.2% 3.8% 38.5% 3.7 15.4% 26
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I can apply the ASCE Code of Ethics to the solution of ethical problems confronting
a practicing engineer.
34.6% 15.4% 3.8% 34.6% 3.9 11.5% 26
Q28 I can explain the elements of project management in the public service and private
sectors.
26.9% 15.4% 3.8% 34.6% 3.8 19.2% 26
Q29 I can demonstrate an appreciation of the challenges facing civil engineers in current
professional practice.
34.6% 15.4% 3.8% 34.6% 3.9 11.5% 26
Q30 I can develop short-term and long-term professional goals, to include consideration
of continuing education and professional registration.
30.8% 15.4% 38.5% 3.9 15.4% 26
Q31 I can communicate effectively in writing. 26.9% 15.4% 38.5% 3.9 19.2% 26
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 30.8% 7.7% 53.8% 3.8 7.7% 26
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 34.6% 3.8% 11.5% 15.4% 4.0 34.6% 26
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 30.8% 11.5% 3.8% 26.9% 4.0 26.9% 26
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 38.5% 7.7% 3.8% 26.9% 4.0 23.1% 26
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A38 I have enhanced my ability to develop an understanding of professional and ethical
responsibility
30.8% 11.5% 3.8% 42.3% 3.8 11.5% 26
A40 I have enhanced my ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
global and societal context
30.8% 11.5% 3.8% 38.5% 3.8 15.4% 26
A41 I have enhanced my ability to develop a recognition of the need for, and an ability
to engage in life-long learning
30.8% 11.5% 3.8% 38.5% 3.8 15.4% 26
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 30.8% 11.5% 3.8% 34.6% 3.9 19.2% 26
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16197
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6083: ECONOMICS
Response Rate: 33/39Primary Instructor: Dreifus,Kenneth
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 33
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 33
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 72.7% 6.1% 4.7 21.2% 33
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 75.8% 3.0% 3.0% 4.7 18.2% 33
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 81.3% 3.1% 3.1% 4.7 12.5% 32
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 75.8% 3.0% 4.7 21.2% 33
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 60.6% 9.1% 4.4 30.3% 33
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 75.8% 3.0% 3.0% 4.7 18.2% 33
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 66.7% 6.1% 12.1% 4.4 15.2% 33
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
60.6% 3.0% 15.2% 4.4 21.2% 33
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
69.7% 12.1% 4.6 18.2% 33
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
63.6% 3.0% 9.1% 4.5 24.2% 33
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 57.6% 6.1% 4.5 36.4% 33
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 66.7% 3.0% 3.0% 4.6 27.3% 33
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 72.7% 3.0% 12.1% 4.5 12.1% 33
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 78.8% 3.0% 3.0% 4.7 15.2% 33
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 16702
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6083: ECONOMICS
Response Rate: 29/38Primary Instructor: Dreifus,Kenneth
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 6.9% 93.1% 29
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 28
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 86.2% 4.9 13.8% 29
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 79.3% 6.9% 4.7 13.8% 29
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 29
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 29
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 86.2% 3.4% 4.8 10.3% 29
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 75.9% 4.8 24.1% 29
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 65.4% 3.8% 7.7% 4.5 23.1% 26
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
69.2% 3.8% 3.8% 4.6 23.1% 26
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
73.1% 3.8% 11.5% 4.5 11.5% 26
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
73.1% 3.8% 15.4% 4.5 7.7% 26
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 3.4% 72.4% 4.6 24.1% 29
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 79.3% 3.4% 4.8 17.2% 29
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 82.8% 3.4% 3.4% 4.7 10.3% 29
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 82.8% 6.9% 4.8 10.3% 29
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17158
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CBE 3323: Transport II
Response Rate: 46/51Primary Instructor: Gallaway,Joshua
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 46
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 45
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 46
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 91.1% 4.9 8.9% 45
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 2.2% 69.6% 2.2% 4.6 26.1% 46
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 65.2% 4.3% 6.5% 4.5 23.9% 46
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 93.3% 2.2% 5.0 4.4% 45
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 60.9% 10.9% 6.5% 4.3 21.7% 46
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 73.9% 2.2% 4.3% 4.7 19.6% 46
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 89.1% 4.9 10.9% 46
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 93.3% 2.2% 4.9 4.4% 45
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 87.0% 4.3% 4.8 8.7% 46
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 93.0% 4.9 7.0% 43
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17033
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 4014: Introduction to E-Business
Response Rate: 31/31Primary Instructor: Bentahar,Abdellatif
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 20.0% 70.0% 10.0% 30
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 29.0% 58.1% 12.9% 31
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 35.5% 6.5% 32.3% 22.6% 2.1 3.2% 31
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 32.3% 6.5% 32.3% 19.4% 2.3 9.7% 31
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 22.6% 12.9% 25.8% 22.6% 2.7 16.1% 31
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 23.3% 3.3% 30.0% 33.3% 2.4 10.0% 30
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 53.3% 6.7% 30.0% 6.7% 1.8 3.3% 30
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 35.5% 3.2% 25.8% 19.4% 2.3 16.1% 31
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 40.0% 6.7% 30.0% 13.3% 2.1 10.0% 30
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
36.7% 6.7% 3.3% 16.7% 23.3% 2.3 13.3% 30
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
43.3% 6.7% 6.7% 20.0% 3.3% 2.2 20.0% 30
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
40.0% 6.7% 3.3% 20.0% 13.3% 2.3 16.7% 30
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 23.3% 6.7% 20.0% 40.0% 2.6 10.0% 30
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 61.3% 3.2% 16.1% 12.9% 1.7 6.5% 31
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 61.3% 6.5% 22.6% 9.7% 1.7 31
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 64.5% 3.2% 12.9% 6.5% 1.8 12.9% 31
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 22456
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 3064: Feedback Control
Response Rate: 29/50Primary Instructor: Jiang,Zhong-ping
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 96.6% 3.4% 29
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 3.7% 92.6% 3.7% 27
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 48.3% 3.4% 10.3% 4.3 37.9% 29
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 17.2% 13.8% 6.9% 6.9% 27.6% 3.1 27.6% 29
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 3.4% 24.1% 3.4% 24.1% 3.4% 3.6 41.4% 29
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 6.9% 17.2% 3.4% 13.8% 17.2% 3.5 41.4% 29
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 10.3% 13.8% 3.4% 27.6% 20.7% 3.0 24.1% 29
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 13.8% 27.6% 3.4% 17.2% 6.9% 3.4 31.0% 29
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 3.4% 17.2% 3.4% 17.2% 24.1% 3.5 34.5% 29
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 10.3% 13.8% 3.4% 17.2% 3.4% 3.4 51.7% 29
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 31.0% 6.9% 3.4% 17.2% 20.7% 2.5 20.7% 29
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 13.8% 20.7% 3.4% 13.8% 17.2% 3.3 31.0% 29
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16898
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 6233: System Optimization Method
Response Rate: 12/13Primary Instructor: Jiang,Zhong-ping
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 12
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 8.3% 83.3% 8.3% 12
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 8.3% 8.3% 8.3% 16.7% 50.0% 2.9 8.3% 12
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 41.7% 8.3% 8.3% 33.3% 2.3 8.3% 12
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 41.7% 33.3% 2.1 25.0% 12
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 8.3% 16.7% 8.3% 50.0% 3.4 16.7% 12
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 33.3% 8.3% 8.3% 25.0% 2.7 25.0% 12
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 33.3% 8.3% 16.7% 2.7 41.7% 12
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 33.3% 16.7% 8.3% 33.3% 2.7 8.3% 12
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 41.7% 8.3% 16.7% 16.7% 2.3 16.7% 12
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
33.3% 8.3% 8.3% 25.0% 2.7 25.0% 12
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 33.3% 8.3% 16.7% 25.0% 2.5 16.7% 12
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
33.3% 8.3% 16.7% 2.7 41.7% 12
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 16.7% 25.0% 16.7% 2.8 41.7% 12
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 16.7% 8.3% 8.3% 25.0% 3.2 41.7% 12
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 16.7% 16.7% 41.7% 3.3 25.0% 12
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 16.7% 8.3% 58.3% 3.0 16.7% 12
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 16.7% 16.7% 66.7% 3.0 12
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 8.3% 8.3% 8.3% 16.7% 25.0% 3.2 33.3% 12
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 16.7% 16.7% 8.3% 8.3% 33.3% 3.1 16.7% 12
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 8.3% 16.7% 8.3% 25.0% 8.3% 3.3 33.3% 12
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 25.0% 8.3% 16.7% 16.7% 2.8 33.3% 12
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 50.0% 16.7% 8.3% 16.7% 2.3 8.3% 12
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 16.7% 8.3% 25.0% 2.3 12
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 22442
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 6253: Linear Systems
Response Rate: 18/24Primary Instructor: Jiang,Zhong-ping
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 17
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.9% 88.2% 5.9% 17
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 77.8% 5.6% 4.7 16.7% 18
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 44.4% 11.1% 16.7% 11.1% 4.0 16.7% 18
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 61.1% 4.6 38.9% 18
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 5.6% 61.1% 5.6% 11.1% 4.2 16.7% 18
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 5.6% 61.1% 16.7% 4.1 16.7% 18
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 5.6% 38.9% 16.7% 3.9 38.9% 18
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 44.4% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 4.3 38.9% 18
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 5.6% 44.4% 11.1% 4.1 38.9% 18
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 38.9% 5.6% 27.8% 4.0 27.8% 18
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 11.1% 33.3% 5.6% 5.6% 3.8 44.4% 18
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 21579
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MN 7503: TARGET COSTING
Response Rate: 8/11Primary Instructor: Bird,Henry
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 7
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 6
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 85.7% 14.3% 4.7 7
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 57.1% 4.6 42.9% 7
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 42.9% 4.4 57.1% 7
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
42.9% 4.4 57.1% 7
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
42.9% 4.4 57.1% 7
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
57.1% 4.6 42.9% 7
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 85.7% 14.3% 4.7 7
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
85.7% 14.3% 4.6 7
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 71.4% 14.3% 4.4 14.3% 7
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 42.9% 42.9% 4.0 14.3% 7
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 71.4% 14.3% 4.6 14.3% 7
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 42.9% 28.6% 4.1 28.6% 7
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 42.9% 14.3% 4.3 42.9% 7
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 57.1% 14.3% 4.4 28.6% 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 71.4% 14.3% 4.6 14.3% 7
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 21579
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MN 7503: TARGET COSTING
Response Rate: 8/11Primary Instructor: Bird,Henry
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 8
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 75.0% 12.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 8
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17486
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 4003: Senior Project in Digital Media
Response Rate: 10/11Primary Instructor: Duff,Deangela L
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 10
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 10.0% 80.0% 4.5 10.0% 10
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 10.0% 80.0% 4.5 10.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 10.0% 80.0% 4.5 10.0% 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 10.0% 80.0% 4.5 10.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 10.0% 60.0% 10.0% 4.1 20.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 10.0% 20.0% 10.0% 60.0% 3.1 10
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed conceptual thinking skills to generate ideas and content in order to
solve problems or create opportunities.
25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 8
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 10.0% 50.0% 10.0% 20.0% 3.8 10.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 20.0% 70.0% 4.1 10.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 10.0% 80.0% 4.5 10.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 10.0% 70.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.1 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: MOT5
Class Number: 16814
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 9753: SELECTED TOPICS IN MANAGEMENT
Response Rate: 19/20Primary Instructor: O'Reilly,Kieran T
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 19
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.3% 94.7% 19
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 19
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 94.7% 4.9 5.3% 19
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 84.2% 4.8 15.8% 19
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 84.2% 4.8 15.8% 19
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 89.5% 4.9 10.5% 19
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 73.7% 5.3% 4.7 21.1% 19
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 5.3% 89.5% 4.7 5.3% 19
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
5.3% 84.2% 4.7 10.5% 19
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
5.3% 78.9% 4.6 15.8% 19
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
5.3% 78.9% 4.6 15.8% 19
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 57.9% 5.3% 4.6 36.8% 19
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 89.5% 4.9 10.5% 19
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 19
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 78.9% 10.5% 4.7 10.5% 19
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 24778
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 9753: SELECTED TOPICS IN MANAGEMENT
Response Rate: 1/2Primary Instructor: O'Reilly,Kieran T
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 1
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 1
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 1
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 1
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 1
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
100.0% 5.0 1
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
100.0% 5.0 1
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
100.0% 5.0 1
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 100.0% 5.0 1
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 100.0% 5.0 1
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
100.0% 5.0 1
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 100.0% 5.0 1
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
100.0% 5.0 1
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 100.0% 5.0 1
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 100.0% 5.0 1
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 100.0% 5.0 1
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 100.0% 5.0 1
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 100.0% 3.0 1
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 100.0% 5.0 1
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 100.0% 3.0 1
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 24778
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 9753: SELECTED TOPICS IN MANAGEMENT
Response Rate: 1/2Primary Instructor: O'Reilly,Kieran T
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: ALEC
Class Number: 17683
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BMS 1004: Introduction to Cell and Molecular Biology
Response Rate: 35/45Primary Instructor: Choy,Brenda Gee
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 6.1% 93.9% 33
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 15.2% 81.8% 3.0% 33
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 67.6% 2.9% 5.9% 4.6 23.5% 34
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 67.6% 5.9% 8.8% 4.5 17.6% 34
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 2.9% 41.2% 2.9% 8.8% 4.2 44.1% 34
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 41.2% 23.5% 14.7% 3.8 20.6% 34
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 2.9% 50.0% 8.8% 8.8% 4.1 29.4% 34
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 6.1% 45.5% 6.1% 12.1% 4.0 30.3% 33
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 2.9% 38.2% 17.6% 11.8% 3.8 29.4% 34
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 5.9% 11.8% 4.3 32.4% 34
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 2.9% 64.7% 2.9% 11.8% 4.4 17.6% 34
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 2.9% 47.1% 17.6% 11.8% 3.9 20.6% 34
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 2.9% 54.3% 11.4% 4.3 31.4% 35
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
48.6% 14.3% 4.3 37.1% 35
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 48.6% 22.9% 4.3 28.6% 35
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: A2LB
Class Number: 17685
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BMS 1004: Introduction to Cell and Molecular Biology
Response Rate: 11/14Primary Instructor: Choy,Brenda Gee
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
9.1% 63.6% 4.4 27.3% 11
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 9.1% 72.7% 4.5 18.2% 11
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 72.7% 4.7 27.3% 11
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 9.1% 72.7% 9.1% 4.4 9.1% 11
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 54.5% 4.5 45.5% 11
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 9.1% 54.5% 4.3 36.4% 11
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 60.0% 20.0% 4.2 20.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
Q40 Value was added to my education. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 63.6% 9.1% 9.1% 4.4 18.2% 11
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 54.5% 9.1% 4.5 36.4% 11
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
63.6% 9.1% 4.5 27.3% 11
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 63.6% 4.6 36.4% 11
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: AREC
Class Number: 17687
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BMS 1004: Introduction to Cell and Molecular Biology
Response Rate: 36/45Primary Instructor: Choy,Brenda Gee
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 14.3% 85.7% 35
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 20.0% 80.0% 35
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 51.4% 5.7% 8.6% 4.3 34.3% 35
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 48.6% 5.7% 11.4% 4.3 34.3% 35
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 2.9% 48.6% 5.7% 22.9% 4.1 20.0% 35
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 5.7% 40.0% 17.1% 14.3% 3.7 22.9% 35
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 2.9% 48.6% 20.0% 4.2 28.6% 35
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 11.4% 37.1% 11.4% 20.0% 3.6 20.0% 35
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 60.0% 11.4% 4.5 28.6% 35
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
57.1% 8.6% 4.5 34.3% 35
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 51.4% 22.9% 4.3 25.7% 35
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 71.4% 5.7% 4.7 22.9% 35
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
68.6% 8.6% 4.6 22.9% 35
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 2.9% 28.6% 17.1% 5.7% 3.8 45.7% 35
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 2.9% 62.9% 2.9% 17.1% 4.4 14.3% 35
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: B2LB
Class Number: 17690
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BMS 1004: Introduction to Cell and Molecular Biology
Response Rate: 7/7Primary Instructor: Choy,Brenda Gee
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
100.0% 5.0 7
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 7
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 7
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 42.9% 28.6% 4.1 28.6% 7
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 7
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 57.1% 14.3% 14.3% 4.5 14.3% 7
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
Q40 Value was added to my education. 71.4% 14.3% 4.8 14.3% 7
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 71.4% 14.3% 4.6 14.3% 7
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 57.1% 28.6% 4.3 14.3% 7
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
71.4% 14.3% 4.8 14.3% 7
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 57.1% 28.6% 4.3 14.3% 7
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16377
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 8353: CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULING
Response Rate: 62/31Primary Instructor: Otruba,Robert
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 62
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 96.7% 3.3% 60
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 96.8% 5.0 3.2% 62
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 62
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 3.2% 32.3% 32.3% 3.2% 3.5 29.0% 62
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 71.0% 3.2% 6.5% 4.6 19.4% 62
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 87.1% 3.2% 4.8 9.7% 62
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 80.6% 3.2% 3.2% 4.7 12.9% 62
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 71.0% 3.2% 4.6 25.8% 62
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 96.8% 3.2% 4.9 62
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 93.4% 3.3% 4.9 3.3% 61
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 93.5% 3.2% 4.9 3.2% 62
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: ALLB
Class Number: 17576
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 2123: MECHANICS OF MATERIALS
Response Rate: 18/24Primary Instructor: Sidelev,Oleksiy V
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 18
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 18
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 94.4% 4.9 5.6% 18
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 83.3% 5.6% 4.8 11.1% 18
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 11.1% 44.4% 5.6% 4.1 38.9% 18
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 61.1% 11.1% 4.5 27.8% 18
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 18
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 77.8% 5.6% 4.8 16.7% 18
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I understand basic principles of stress and strain in axial loading, shear, torsion and
bending.
5.9% 70.6% 4.5 23.5% 17
Q28 I understand the principles of transformation of stress for design. 5.9% 58.8% 5.9% 4.4 29.4% 17
Q29 I can evaluate deformation in typical solid elements subject to external forces. 5.9% 64.7% 4.5 29.4% 17
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 11.1% 55.6% 5.6% 4.1 27.8% 18
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 5.6% 77.8% 5.6% 4.6 11.1% 18
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 18
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 5.6% 72.2% 4.6 22.2% 18
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 5.9% 70.6% 4.5 23.5% 17
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17484
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 2193: Intro to Web Development
Response Rate: 14/22Primary Instructor: Adee,Kathryn A
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 14
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 14.3% 85.7% 14
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 14
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 71.4% 14.3% 4.6 14.3% 14
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 71.4% 7.1% 14.3% 4.6 7.1% 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 57.1% 7.1% 21.4% 4.4 14.3% 14
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 14
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 85.7% 7.1% 4.7 7.1% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17232
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 2413: DESIGN & ANALYSIS OF ALGORITHMS
Response Rate: 26/54Primary Instructor: Aronov,Boris
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 92.0% 8.0% 25
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 26
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 50.0% 3.8% 4.5 46.2% 26
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 34.6% 3.8% 15.4% 19.2% 3.8 26.9% 26
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 34.6% 3.8% 3.8% 4.3 57.7% 26
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 7.7% 42.3% 11.5% 15.4% 3.8 23.1% 26
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 7.7% 19.2% 19.2% 15.4% 3.4 38.5% 26
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 15.4% 19.2% 11.5% 3.7 53.8% 26
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 7.7% 23.1% 26.9% 23.1% 3.2 19.2% 26
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 34.6% 7.7% 19.2% 4.0 38.5% 26
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 7.7% 19.2% 19.2% 19.2% 3.4 34.6% 26
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 3.8% 26.9% 15.4% 23.1% 3.6 30.8% 26
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: C
Class Number: 23721
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 2413: DESIGN & ANALYSIS OF ALGORITHMS
Response Rate: 20/29Primary Instructor: Aronov,Boris
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 20
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 20
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 50.0% 5.0% 10.0% 4.4 35.0% 20
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 35.0% 5.0% 35.0% 4.0 25.0% 20
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 25.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.0 55.0% 20
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 25.0% 15.0% 10.0% 3.9 50.0% 20
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 20.0% 5.0% 10.0% 25.0% 3.7 40.0% 20
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 5.0% 30.0% 15.0% 4.0 50.0% 20
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 5.0% 15.0% 5.0% 20.0% 15.0% 3.4 40.0% 20
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 20.0% 5.0% 20.0% 15.0% 3.6 40.0% 20
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 10.0% 20.0% 5.0% 5.0% 15.0% 3.6 45.0% 20
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 15.0% 20.0% 5.0% 20.0% 3.5 40.0% 20
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17156
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FIN 2003: Economic Foundations of Finance
Response Rate: 36/29Primary Instructor: Biederman,Paul
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 5.6% 88.9% 5.6% 36
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.9% 94.1% 34
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 77.8% 5.6% 4.7 16.7% 36
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 38.9% 8.3% 33.3% 3.9 19.4% 36
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 5.6% 41.7% 8.3% 27.8% 3.8 16.7% 36
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 8.3% 55.6% 5.6% 4.3 30.6% 36
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 2.8% 66.7% 8.3% 2.8% 4.4 19.4% 36
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 63.9% 8.3% 2.8% 4.4 25.0% 36
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 55.6% 5.6% 11.1% 4.3 27.8% 36
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 72.2% 5.6% 4.7 22.2% 36
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 66.7% 2.8% 13.9% 4.5 16.7% 36
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 66.7% 5.6% 11.1% 4.4 16.7% 36
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16741
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6031: Money, Banking and Financial Markets
Response Rate: 4/4Primary Instructor: Biederman,Paul
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 4
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 4
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 4.0 25.0% 4
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 4.0 50.0% 4
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 4
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 25.0% 4.0 25.0% 4
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16749
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6391: MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS
Response Rate: 9/9Primary Instructor: Biederman,Paul
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 9
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 9
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 55.6% 4.6 44.4% 9
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 55.6% 11.1% 4.4 33.3% 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 66.7% 11.1% 4.6 22.2% 9
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 55.6% 4.6 44.4% 9
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16290
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6963: Digital Forensics
Response Rate: 10/13Primary Instructor: Budofsky,Marc R.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 10
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 10
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 80.0% 10.0% 4.6 10.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 10.0% 50.0% 10.0% 10.0% 3.9 20.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 40.0% 20.0% 4.2 40.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 40.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.8 20.0% 10
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 10
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 50.0% 10.0% 4.3 40.0% 10
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
60.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.3 20.0% 10
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 10
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
60.0% 4.6 40.0% 10
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 10
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 70.0% 4.7 30.0% 10
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 20.0% 70.0% 3.5 10.0% 10
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 20.0% 70.0% 3.5 10.0% 10
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 20.0% 60.0% 3.6 20.0% 10
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 40.0% 20.0% 4.2 40.0% 10
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 40.0% 20.0% 4.2 40.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 70.0% 4.7 30.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 70.0% 4.7 30.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17125
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 3311: Fluid Mechanics Laboratory
Response Rate: 9/18Primary Instructor: Tafuni,Angelantonio
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
100.0% 5.0 9
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 9
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 77.8% 11.1% 4.7 11.1% 9
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 9
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Ability to use experimental equipment and measurement systems in fluid
mechanics.
88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
Q28 Ability to write effective reports. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 9
Q29 Ability to analyze and interpret data in fluid mechanics experiments 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 9
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to
analyze and interpret data
77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
A39 I have enhanced my ability to communicate effectively 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
100.0% 5.0 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 17299
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 3311: Fluid Mechanics Laboratory
Response Rate: 9/26Primary Instructor: Tafuni,Angelantonio
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
88.9% 11.1% 4.8 9
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 88.9% 11.1% 4.8 9
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 66.7% 11.1% 4.4 22.2% 9
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 88.9% 11.1% 4.8 9
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Ability to use experimental equipment and measurement systems in fluid
mechanics.
88.9% 11.1% 4.8 9
Q28 Ability to write effective reports. 77.8% 11.1% 4.7 11.1% 9
Q29 Ability to analyze and interpret data in fluid mechanics experiments 88.9% 11.1% 4.8 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 9
Q40 Value was added to my education. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to
analyze and interpret data
88.9% 11.1% 4.8 9
A39 I have enhanced my ability to communicate effectively 88.9% 11.1% 4.8 9
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
88.9% 11.1% 4.8 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: C
Class Number: 24001
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 3311: Fluid Mechanics Laboratory
Response Rate: 15/26Primary Instructor: Tafuni,Angelantonio
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
80.0% 4.8 20.0% 15
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 73.3% 6.7% 4.7 20.0% 15
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 93.3% 4.9 6.7% 15
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 93.3% 4.9 6.7% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 86.7% 6.7% 4.8 6.7% 15
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 13.3% 66.7% 6.7% 4.2 13.3% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 80.0% 6.7% 4.7 13.3% 15
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 60.0% 13.3% 4.5 26.7% 15
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Ability to use experimental equipment and measurement systems in fluid
mechanics.
78.6% 4.8 21.4% 14
Q28 Ability to write effective reports. 71.4% 7.1% 4.6 21.4% 14
Q29 Ability to analyze and interpret data in fluid mechanics experiments 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 14
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 73.3% 4.7 26.7% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 93.3% 4.9 6.7% 15
Q40 Value was added to my education. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 15
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to
analyze and interpret data
71.4% 7.1% 4.6 21.4% 14
A39 I have enhanced my ability to communicate effectively 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
92.9% 4.9 7.1% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 17300
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 3313: Fluid Mechanics
Response Rate: 28/28Primary Instructor: Tafuni,Angelantonio
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 28
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 96.3% 3.7% 27
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 96.4% 5.0 3.6% 28
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 92.9% 3.6% 4.9 3.6% 28
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 85.7% 3.6% 4.8 10.7% 28
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 78.6% 3.6% 4.7 17.9% 28
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 28
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 82.1% 4.8 17.9% 28
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learned the basic concepts related to fluids and stresses in fluids, hydrostatics and
conservation equations for a control volume.
89.3% 4.9 10.7% 28
Q28 Learned about potential flows, stream function, and Euler’s and Bernoulli’s
equations
89.3% 4.9 10.7% 28
Q29 Learned about viscous flow in pipes and ducts, and flow over immersed bodies, and
how to solve problems in piping systems
85.7% 3.6% 4.8 10.7% 28
Q30 Learned how to design piping systems 64.3% 3.6% 7.1% 4.6 25.0% 28
Q31 Learned about impact of hydropower in industrial and power production. 46.2% 3.8% 7.7% 15.4% 4.2 26.9% 26
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 71.4% 3.6% 4.6 25.0% 28
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 28
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 89.3% 3.6% 4.8 7.1% 28
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 85.7% 3.6% 4.9 10.7% 28
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 89.3% 4.9 10.7% 28
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
82.1% 3.6% 4.8 14.3% 28
A40 I have enhanced my ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
global and societal context
78.6% 3.6% 4.8 17.9% 28
A48 I have enhanced my ability to apply principles of engineering, basic science, and
mathematics (including multivariate calculus and differential equations) to model,
analyze, design, and realize physical systems, components or processes
96.4% 5.0 3.6% 28
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17392
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 4311: Heat Transfer Laboratory
Response Rate: 4/4Primary Instructor: Tafuni,Angelantonio
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Understood the basic modes of heat transfer 100.0% 5.0 4
Q28 Learned to design heat transfer experiments 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q29 Was able to carry out heat transfer experiments and report the results in an
effective manner
75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q40 Value was added to my education. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 4
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 5 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 23236
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
TR 7133: Urban Public Transportation Systems
Response Rate: 10/13Primary Instructor: Chow,Ying Jun Joseph
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 10
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 80.0% 10.0% 4.7 10.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 40.0% 20.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.1 20.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 80.0% 10.0% 4.7 10.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 80.0% 20.0% 4.6 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17122
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 3213: Mechanics of Materials
Response Rate: 14/20Primary Instructor: Mansoor-Baghaei,Shahab
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 14.3% 85.7% 14
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 14.3% 85.7% 14
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 14
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 14
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 64.3% 7.1% 4.6 28.6% 14
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Understood the concept of Stress and Strain, Normal stress & strain, Shear stress &
strain, General state of stress, Design considerations, design of simple corrections
85.7% 4.9 14.3% 14
Q28 Understood Stress analysis, Materials behavior, constitutive relationship, Hooke’s
law, stress concentration, Transformation equations, Mohr’s circle
64.3% 4.6 35.7% 14
Q29 Learned about axially loaded members, Torsion, Change of length, angle of twist,
transmission of power by shafts statically indeterminate structure
78.6% 4.8 21.4% 14
Q30 Understood bending, Shear and moment diagram, shear force, transverse loading
relationship, flexure formula
71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
Q31 Learned about Deflection of beams, Differential equation of deflection curve,
method of superposition, Castigliano’s theorem
71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 92.9% 7.1% 4.9 14
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 92.9% 7.1% 4.8 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 85.7% 7.1% 7.1% 4.6 14
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 14
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 14
A48 I have enhanced my ability to apply principles of engineering, basic science, and
mathematics (including multivariate calculus and differential equations) to model,
analyze, design, and realize physical systems, components or processes
85.7% 4.9 14.3% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 22260
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
STS 1002: Introduction to Science and Technology Studies
Response Rate: 13/14Primary Instructor: Restivo,Sal P.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 92.3% 7.7% 13
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 92.3% 7.7% 13
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 76.9% 7.7% 7.7% 4.8 7.7% 13
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 61.5% 7.7% 15.4% 4.5 15.4% 13
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 76.9% 7.7% 7.7% 4.8 7.7% 13
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 61.5% 7.7% 7.7% 4.6 23.1% 13
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 61.5% 7.7% 7.7% 4.6 23.1% 13
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 61.5% 7.7% 15.4% 4.5 15.4% 13
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 61.5% 7.7% 7.7% 4.6 23.1% 13
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 53.8% 7.7% 7.7% 15.4% 4.3 15.4% 13
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 69.2% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 4.5 7.7% 13
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 53.8% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 4.3 23.1% 13
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17514
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
STS 2904: Special Topics in STS
Response Rate: 23/27Primary Instructor: Restivo,Sal P.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 95.7% 4.3% 23
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 4.3% 95.7% 23
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 82.6% 4.8 17.4% 23
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 65.2% 4.3% 4.3% 4.5 26.1% 23
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 59.1% 4.5% 9.1% 4.4 27.3% 22
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 72.7% 4.5% 4.7 22.7% 22
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 60.9% 4.3% 13.0% 4.5 21.7% 23
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 56.5% 8.7% 8.7% 4.3 26.1% 23
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have enhanced my ability to understand and demonstrate the relationship
between content of scientific and technological knowledge, and the social and
intellectual context in which it is created.
73.9% 4.7 26.1% 23
Q28 I have enhanced my ability to understand and demonstrate how social processes
frame scientific and technological enterprises, including theory construction,
invention, and innovation.
65.2% 4.3% 4.3% 4.5 26.1% 23
Q29 I have enhanced my ability to understand and demonstrate how science and
technology shape society (in historical, philosophical, sociological, cultural and
technical ways).
78.3% 4.8 21.7% 23
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 56.5% 4.3% 4.3% 4.5 34.8% 23
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 78.3% 4.3% 4.7 17.4% 23
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 82.6% 4.3% 4.8 13.0% 23
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 87.0% 4.9 13.0% 23
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16795
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 7133: Digital Signal Processing II
Response Rate: 30/36Primary Instructor: Selesnick,Ivan W
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 3.3% 96.7% 30
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 30
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 93.3% 4.9 6.7% 30
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 96.7% 5.0 3.3% 30
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 66.7% 3.3% 6.7% 4.6 23.3% 30
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 3.3% 80.0% 3.3% 4.7 13.3% 30
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 30
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 30
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 60.0% 13.3% 6.7% 4.3 20.0% 30
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 86.7% 3.3% 4.8 10.0% 30
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 93.3% 3.3% 4.9 3.3% 30
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 73.3% 3.3% 4.7 23.3% 30
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 22263
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
STS 2214W: Medical Ethics
Response Rate: 19/20Primary Instructor: Silberman,Jared H
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 5.3% 94.7% 19
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.3% 94.7% 19
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 5.3% 73.7% 5.3% 4.5 15.8% 19
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 73.7% 4.7 26.3% 19
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 5.3% 68.4% 10.5% 4.3 15.8% 19
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 78.9% 4.8 21.1% 19
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 68.4% 5.3% 4.6 26.3% 19
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 68.4% 5.3% 10.5% 5.3% 4.4 10.5% 19
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 68.4% 4.7 31.6% 19
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 78.9% 4.8 21.1% 19
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 89.5% 4.9 10.5% 19
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 89.5% 4.9 10.5% 19
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: G2
Class Number: 17650
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 2034: Linear Algebra and Differential Equations
Response Rate: 3/22Primary Instructor: Jacobovits,Rachel
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 33.3% 66.7% 3
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 66.7% 33.3% 3
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 3
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 3
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
100.0% 5.0 3
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
Q29 I need more HW problems. 33.3% 66.7% 3.0 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: C2
Class Number: 17652
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 2034: Linear Algebra and Differential Equations
Response Rate: 3/24Primary Instructor: Jacobovits,Rachel
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 3
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 3
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 33.3% 3.3 66.7% 3
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
33.3% 33.3% 4.0 33.3% 3
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 66.7% 33.3% 1.7 3
Q29 I need more HW problems. 33.3% 66.7% 1.7 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 66.7% 33.3% 4.3 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17192
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CBE 3223: KINETICS AND REACTOR DESIGN
Response Rate: 34/51Primary Instructor: Song,Qing
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 94.1% 5.9% 34
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 34
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 8.8% 8.8% 35.3% 11.8% 3.0 35.3% 34
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 8.8% 11.8% 8.8% 26.5% 3.4 44.1% 34
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 26.5% 2.9% 8.8% 4.1 61.8% 34
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 27.3% 9.1% 12.1% 4.0 51.5% 33
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 8.8% 17.6% 2.9% 14.7% 14.7% 3.5 41.2% 34
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 2.9% 32.4% 2.9% 14.7% 5.9% 3.9 41.2% 34
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have learned to make mole balances on batch reactors, CSTRs, PFRs and PBRs. 27.3% 6.1% 4.2 66.7% 33
Q28 I can use design equations, rate laws and stoichiometric relations to design
isothermal reactors.
21.2% 6.1% 3.0% 4.1 69.7% 33
Q29 I can apply the first law to develop conversion, temperature and rate profiles for
non-isothermal reactors.
12.1% 18.2% 15.2% 3.6 54.5% 33
Q30 I have a fundamental understanding of catalytic processes including adsorption and
desorption, surface reactions and effectiveness factors.
6.1% 9.1% 12.1% 30.3% 3.4 42.4% 33
Q31 I understand the basic dynamics of CSTR’s and PFR’s 24.2% 6.1% 15.2% 4.0 54.5% 33
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 2.9% 20.6% 23.5% 14.7% 3.5 38.2% 34
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 5.9% 8.8% 5.9% 17.6% 3.6 61.8% 34
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 11.8% 8.8% 17.6% 41.2% 3.0 20.6% 34
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 5.9% 11.8% 17.6% 20.6% 3.4 44.1% 34
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
15.2% 6.1% 9.1% 3.9 69.7% 33
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 17169
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CBE 4213: Engineering Laboratory II
Response Rate: 11/11Primary Instructor: Song,Qing
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
54.5% 18.2% 4.2 27.3% 11
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 54.5% 18.2% 9.1% 2.4 18.2% 11
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 9.1% 36.4% 9.1% 27.3% 3.6 18.2% 11
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 9.1% 27.3% 9.1% 18.2% 3.6 36.4% 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 9.1% 36.4% 9.1% 9.1% 3.8 36.4% 11
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 36.4% 18.2% 9.1% 3.9 36.4% 11
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 45.5% 18.2% 4.1 36.4% 11
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 18.2% 18.2% 27.3% 3.5 36.4% 11
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have improved my ability to plan and conduct experiments. 45.5% 9.1% 9.1% 4.2 36.4% 11
Q28 I am much more confident in my ability to prepare written technical reports. 45.5% 9.1% 4.4 45.5% 11
Q29 I have a much better understanding of data analysis techniques including error
analysis and propagation.
45.5% 27.3% 4.2 27.3% 11
Q30 I am more comfortable working on a team, both as a team leader and as a team
member
54.5% 18.2% 4.4 27.3% 11
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 36.4% 9.1% 9.1% 4.1 45.5% 11
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 9.1% 36.4% 18.2% 9.1% 3.6 27.3% 11
Q40 Value was added to my education. 36.4% 18.2% 9.1% 3.9 36.4% 11
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 9.1% 36.4% 9.1% 9.1% 3.8 36.4% 11
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
54.5% 27.3% 4.3 18.2% 11
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 54.5% 9.1% 4.5 36.4% 11
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: D
Class Number: 17470
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CBE 4213: Engineering Laboratory II
Response Rate: 12/13Primary Instructor: Song,Qing
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
50.0% 8.3% 4.3 41.7% 12
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 25.0% 16.7% 41.7% 8.3% 2.5 8.3% 12
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 41.7% 8.3% 25.0% 4.0 25.0% 12
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 9.1% 63.6% 9.1% 9.1% 4.1 9.1% 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 58.3% 8.3% 4.5 33.3% 12
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 12
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 16.7% 4.3 33.3% 12
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 41.7% 8.3% 4.3 50.0% 12
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have improved my ability to plan and conduct experiments. 50.0% 8.3% 8.3% 4.5 33.3% 12
Q28 I am much more confident in my ability to prepare written technical reports. 33.3% 8.3% 4.4 58.3% 12
Q29 I have a much better understanding of data analysis techniques including error
analysis and propagation.
41.7% 8.3% 8.3% 4.4 41.7% 12
Q30 I am more comfortable working on a team, both as a team leader and as a team
member
50.0% 8.3% 16.7% 4.4 25.0% 12
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 58.3% 8.3% 4.5 33.3% 12
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 8.3% 41.7% 8.3% 8.3% 3.9 33.3% 12
Q40 Value was added to my education. 58.3% 8.3% 8.3% 4.3 25.0% 12
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 58.3% 8.3% 8.3% 8.3% 4.4 16.7% 12
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
33.3% 8.3% 16.7% 4.2 41.7% 12
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 33.3% 8.3% 4.4 58.3% 12
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16536
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6033: Design and Analysis of Algorithms I
Response Rate: 16/20Primary Instructor: Rajagopalan,Siva Raj
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 16
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 16
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 81.3% 6.3% 4.8 12.5% 16
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 6.3% 43.8% 18.8% 3.9 31.3% 16
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 37.5% 25.0% 3.9 37.5% 16
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 68.8% 6.3% 6.3% 4.5 18.8% 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 31.3% 12.5% 4.1 56.3% 16
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 62.5% 6.3% 4.5 31.3% 16
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 6.7% 66.7% 13.3% 4.2 13.3% 15
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 93.8% 4.9 6.3% 16
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
50.0% 12.5% 12.5% 4.1 25.0% 16
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 6.3% 50.0% 12.5% 6.3% 4.0 25.0% 16
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
50.0% 12.5% 12.5% 4.1 25.0% 16
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 62.5% 6.3% 4.5 31.3% 16
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 68.8% 12.5% 4.6 18.8% 16
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 37.5% 6.3% 43.8% 3.9 12.5% 16
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 37.5% 6.3% 43.8% 3.9 12.5% 16
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 37.5% 6.3% 37.5% 4.0 18.8% 16
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 12.5% 75.0% 4.4 12.5% 16
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 12.5% 62.5% 12.5% 4.1 12.5% 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 12.5% 50.0% 12.5% 3.9 25.0% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 56.3% 6.3% 4.5 37.5% 16
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 6.3% 56.3% 6.3% 4.4 31.3% 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 6.3% 56.3% 4.4 37.5% 16
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17543
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
HI 2514W: INTRODUCTION TO NEW YORK CITY HISTORY
Response Rate: 7/8Primary Instructor: Toler,Herbert
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 7
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 7
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 7
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 57.1% 14.3% 4.4 28.6% 7
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 71.4% 28.6% 4.4 7
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 57.1% 14.3% 4.3 28.6% 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 42.9% 4.4 57.1% 7
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 57.1% 4.6 42.9% 7
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 57.1% 14.3% 4.4 28.6% 7
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 57.1% 14.3% 4.4 28.6% 7
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17674
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 2104: Organizational Behavior
Response Rate: 6/13Primary Instructor: Landry,Dana J
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 6
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 6
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
100.0% 5.0 6
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
100.0% 5.0 6
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
100.0% 5.0 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 83.3% 16.7% 4.7 6
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17089
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 4503: Construction Engineering
Response Rate: 24/31Primary Instructor: Prancl,Patrick J
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 24
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 24
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 24
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 4.2% 45.8% 4.2% 8.3% 12.5% 4.0 25.0% 24
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 41.7% 8.3% 4.3 50.0% 24
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 45.8% 8.3% 4.2% 4.3 41.7% 24
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 62.5% 8.3% 4.5 29.2% 24
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.2% 37.5% 4.2% 8.3% 29.2% 3.8 16.7% 24
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I was exposed to various types of construction machinery. 62.5% 8.3% 4.5 29.2% 24
Q28 I understand the concepts related to construction planning and productivity. 54.2% 4.5 45.8% 24
Q29 I am now familiar with engineering aspects of construction. 58.3% 4.6 41.7% 24
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 8.3% 12.5% 4.2 29.2% 24
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 79.2% 4.8 20.8% 24
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 66.7% 4.2% 8.3% 4.5 20.8% 24
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 66.7% 8.3% 4.5 25.0% 24
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17073
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 3103: Fundamentals of Applied Nuclear Physics
Response Rate: 8/12Primary Instructor: Sanchez,John
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 62.5% 37.5% 8
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 37.5% 50.0% 12.5% 8
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 8
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 25.0% 4.3 25.0% 8
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 37.5% 25.0% 12.5% 3.8 25.0% 8
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 8
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 12.5% 37.5% 3.8 50.0% 8
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 37.5% 4.4 62.5% 8
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 8
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 62.5% 4.6 37.5% 8
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17239
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 2164: INTRODUCTION TO PROGRAMMING IN C
Response Rate: 34/40Primary Instructor: Sandoval,Gustavo
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 5.9% 94.1% 34
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 3.1% 96.9% 32
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 58.8% 2.9% 11.8% 4.4 26.5% 34
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 35.3% 14.7% 20.6% 3.9 29.4% 34
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 8.8% 11.8% 35.3% 14.7% 3.0 29.4% 34
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 5.9% 29.4% 17.6% 3.9 47.1% 34
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 8.8% 26.5% 11.8% 20.6% 3.6 32.4% 34
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 8.8% 20.6% 2.9% 20.6% 20.6% 3.3 26.5% 34
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 8.8% 23.5% 5.9% 17.6% 3.7 44.1% 34
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 35.3% 2.9% 11.8% 4.2 50.0% 34
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 11.8% 38.2% 5.9% 14.7% 3.8 29.4% 34
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 5.9% 29.4% 14.7% 5.9% 3.8 44.1% 34
Y. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 70.6% 2.9% 4.7 26.5% 34
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 67.6% 2.9% 4.6 29.4% 34
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 60.6% 3.0% 9.1% 4.5 27.3% 33
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
50.0% 2.9% 8.8% 20.6% 4.1 17.6% 34
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 44.1% 2.9% 38.2% 4.1 14.7% 34
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 64.7% 8.8% 4.6 26.5% 34
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17485
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 3133: 3D Animation
Response Rate: 8/11Primary Instructor: Skwarek,Mark L
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 7
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 85.7% 14.3% 7
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 42.9% 4.4 57.1% 7
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 28.6% 4.3 71.4% 7
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 4.0 62.5% 8
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 28.6% 42.9% 3.9 28.6% 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 14.3% 3.6 85.7% 7
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 57.1% 4.6 42.9% 7
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 14.3% 14.3% 4.0 71.4% 7
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 42.9% 4.4 57.1% 7
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 21582
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 6133: Mobile Augmented Reality Studio
Response Rate: 11/18Primary Instructor: Skwarek,Mark L
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 9.1% 90.9% 11
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 11
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 72.7% 18.2% 4.5 9.1% 11
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 63.6% 18.2% 4.5 18.2% 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 36.4% 9.1% 4.3 54.5% 11
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 45.5% 36.4% 4.1 18.2% 11
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 18.2% 9.1% 36.4% 9.1% 3.3 27.3% 11
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 45.5% 18.2% 36.4% 3.7 11
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 45.5% 18.2% 18.2% 3.9 18.2% 11
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 45.5% 9.1% 4.3 45.5% 11
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 54.5% 9.1% 18.2% 4.2 18.2% 11
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 9.1% 45.5% 9.1% 27.3% 3.7 9.1% 11
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: E
Class Number: 17660
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 2114: Calculus III: Multi-Dimensional Calculus
Response Rate: 6/36Primary Instructor: Parekh,Ankit
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 6
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 83.3% 16.7% 4.7 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 66.7% 16.7% 4.3 16.7% 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 66.7% 16.7% 4.5 16.7% 6
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 33.3% 50.0% 3.8 16.7% 6
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
33.3% 16.7% 33.3% 4.0 16.7% 6
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 50.0% 16.7% 2.8 33.3% 6
Q29 I need more HW problems. 50.0% 16.7% 16.7% 4.0 16.7% 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 3.3 50.0% 6
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 16.7% 4.2 33.3% 6
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 16.7% 33.3% 3.8 50.0% 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17235
Dept. of General Engineering
EG 1001: Engineering and Technology Forum
Response Rate: 236/275Primary Instructor: Lefer,David G
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 16.5% 77.5% 5.9% 236
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 20.9% 74.8% 4.3% 230
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 1.3% 46.0% 0.4% 4.7% 11.9% 4.2 35.7% 235
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 3.0% 37.1% 2.2% 4.3% 23.3% 4.0 30.2% 232
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 0.4% 51.1% 0.4% 3.9% 4.8% 4.4 39.4% 231
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 1.7% 49.8% 0.4% 5.2% 9.0% 4.3 33.9% 233
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 6.9% 32.8% 0.9% 9.9% 10.3% 3.8 39.2% 232
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 8.7% 18.3% 6.1% 8.7% 34.5% 3.4 23.6% 229
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 After taking this course I have a better understanding of what invention,
innovation, and entrepreneurship mean.
3.3% 28.9% 1.4% 4.3% 11.8% 4.0 50.2% 211
Q28 The guest lectures exposed me to new concepts and ideas I would not have
encountered elsewhere.
1.4% 38.5% 1.0% 4.3% 10.6% 4.2 44.2% 208
Q29 After taking this course, I am more likely to tackle problems in an innovative way. 5.3% 23.4% 1.0% 12.9% 19.1% 3.6 38.3% 209
Q30 This course has influenced my long-term educational or career goals. 12.7% 19.5% 0.5% 18.0% 25.4% 3.2 23.9% 205
Q31 After taking this course, I am more interested in starting my own venture. 9.7% 22.2% 0.5% 12.6% 28.5% 3.4 26.6% 207
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 17.7% 18.1% 0.4% 25.0% 12.1% 3.0 26.7% 232
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 8.7% 19.5% 1.3% 12.6% 16.9% 3.5 41.1% 231
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 6.2% 30.8% 0.9% 6.6% 22.5% 3.8 33.0% 227
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 16.5% 16.9% 1.7% 16.5% 20.3% 3.1 28.1% 231
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17126
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 3313: Fluid Mechanics
Response Rate: 38/47Primary Instructor: Dressaire,Emilie
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 38
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 97.2% 2.8% 36
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 94.7% 4.9 5.3% 38
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 89.5% 4.9 10.5% 38
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 81.6% 2.6% 2.6% 4.7 13.2% 38
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 86.8% 2.6% 4.8 10.5% 38
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 81.6% 2.6% 4.8 15.8% 38
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 76.3% 2.6% 5.3% 4.7 15.8% 38
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learned the basic concepts related to fluids and stresses in fluids, hydrostatics and
conservation equations for a control volume.
86.5% 2.7% 4.8 10.8% 37
Q28 Learned about potential flows, stream function, and Euler’s and Bernoulli’s
equations
86.5% 2.7% 4.8 10.8% 37
Q29 Learned about viscous flow in pipes and ducts, and flow over immersed bodies, and
how to solve problems in piping systems
78.4% 2.7% 2.7% 4.8 16.2% 37
Q30 Learned how to design piping systems 2.7% 73.0% 5.4% 8.1% 4.5 10.8% 37
Q31 Learned about impact of hydropower in industrial and power production. 2.7% 59.5% 8.1% 10.8% 4.2 18.9% 37
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 73.7% 5.3% 4.7 21.1% 38
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 81.6% 2.6% 2.6% 4.7 13.2% 38
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 86.8% 5.3% 4.8 7.9% 38
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 78.9% 5.3% 2.6% 4.7 13.2% 38
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 83.8% 2.7% 4.8 13.5% 37
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
81.1% 2.7% 4.8 16.2% 37
A40 I have enhanced my ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
global and societal context
73.0% 2.7% 8.1% 4.6 16.2% 37
A48 I have enhanced my ability to apply principles of engineering, basic science, and
mathematics (including multivariate calculus and differential equations) to model,
analyze, design, and realize physical systems, components or processes
78.4% 2.7% 4.7 18.9% 37
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16752
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6491: Credit Risk & Financial Risk Management
Response Rate: 5/5Primary Instructor: Des Etangs Roux,Frederic Pascal Lucien
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 20.0% 80.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 5
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 23253
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 7851: TOPICS IN FINANCIAL AND RISK ENGINEERING 2
Response Rate: 8/25Primary Instructor: Des Etangs Roux,Frederic Pascal Lucien
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 7
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 8
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 8
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 8
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 8
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 8
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 8
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 8
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 8
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 8
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 8
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16889
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6373: Human Capital Big Data, Predictive Analytics, & ROI
Response Rate: 1/10Primary Instructor: Squires,Paul
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 1
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 1
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 1
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 1
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 1
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
100.0% 5.0 1
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
100.0% 5.0 1
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
100.0% 5.0 1
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 1
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LVL1
Class Number: 16961
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6373: Human Capital Big Data, Predictive Analytics, & ROI
Response Rate: 4/13Primary Instructor: Squires,Paul
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 4
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 4
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 4
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 25.0% 4.0 25.0% 4
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 25.0% 4.3 25.0% 4
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 25.0% 25.0% 4.0 50.0% 4
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 25.0% 25.0% 3.3 50.0% 4
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
25.0% 25.0% 3.8 50.0% 4
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
50.0% 25.0% 4.0 25.0% 4
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
25.0% 25.0% 4.0 50.0% 4
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
50.0% 25.0% 4.0 25.0% 4
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
75.0% 25.0% 4.5 4
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 4
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 25.0% 4.3 75.0% 4
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 100.0% 3.0 4
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 25.0% 75.0% 3.5 4
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 100.0% 5.0 4
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 100.0% 5.0 4
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 25.0% 3.8 75.0% 4
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LVL1
Class Number: 16961
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6373: Human Capital Big Data, Predictive Analytics, & ROI
Response Rate: 4/13Primary Instructor: Squires,Paul
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 4
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17709
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 4193: Timber and Masonry Structures
Response Rate: 15/23Primary Instructor: Rodriguez,Patricia A
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 15
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 86.7% 6.7% 4.7 6.7% 15
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 53.3% 6.7% 4.5 40.0% 15
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 80.0% 6.7% 4.7 13.3% 15
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 6.7% 40.0% 4.2 53.3% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 73.3% 6.7% 4.7 20.0% 15
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 6.7% 73.3% 6.7% 4.5 13.3% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 6.7% 46.7% 6.7% 4.2 40.0% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 24463
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6863: FUNDAMENTALS OF SECURITY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
Response Rate: 2/3Primary Instructor: Vaidya,Mehul J.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 2
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 2
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 50.0% 50.0% 2.0 2
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 50.0% 2.0 2
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 50.0% 1.0 2
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 4.0 50.0% 2
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 3.0 50.0% 2
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 50.0% 3.0 50.0% 2
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 4.0 100.0% 2
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
100.0% 3.0 2
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 100.0% 3.0 2
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
50.0% 50.0% 2.5 2
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 4.0 100.0% 2
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 50.0% 3.0 50.0% 2
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 100.0% 3.0 2
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 100.0% 3.0 2
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 100.0% 3.0 2
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 50.0% 50.0% 2.0 2
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 50.0% 50.0% 2.0 2
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 3.5 50.0% 2
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 3.0 50.0% 2
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 50.0% 50.0% 2.5 2
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 50.0% 2.5 2
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17199
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 3553: Non-Structural Building Systems
Response Rate: 24/33Primary Instructor: Rodwick,William
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 4.2% 95.8% 24
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 4.3% 91.3% 4.3% 23
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 25.0% 4.2% 12.5% 12.5% 3.9 45.8% 24
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 4.2% 16.7% 4.2% 20.8% 33.3% 3.3 20.8% 24
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 29.2% 4.2% 20.8% 12.5% 3.7 33.3% 24
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 4.2% 20.8% 4.2% 25.0% 8.3% 3.5 37.5% 24
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 16.7% 8.3% 33.3% 16.7% 2.8 25.0% 24
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.2% 33.3% 16.7% 4.0 45.8% 24
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I understand the basic principles of construction projects, interaction between
design consultants and construction team
17.4% 8.7% 8.7% 3.9 65.2% 23
Q28 I acquired a basic understanding of building HVAC, plumbing, fire protection,
electrical and specialty systems.
18.2% 9.1% 9.1% 3.9 63.6% 22
Q29 I understand how sustainable, energy efficient building systems are incorporated
into the building design
26.1% 8.7% 13.0% 4.0 52.2% 23
Q30 I learned how to read mechanical and electrical drawings and coordination 13.0% 26.1% 26.1% 3.3 34.8% 23
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 12.5% 16.7% 12.5% 12.5% 3.4 45.8% 24
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.2% 25.0% 8.3% 12.5% 3.8 50.0% 24
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 25.0% 8.3% 16.7% 16.7% 2.8 33.3% 24
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.2% 20.8% 33.3% 16.7% 3.3 25.0% 24
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16316
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 6123: Image and Video Processing
Response Rate: 20/32Primary Instructor: Wang,Yao
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 20
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 20
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 70.0% 4.7 30.0% 20
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 70.0% 4.7 30.0% 20
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 20
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 80.0% 5.0% 4.8 15.0% 20
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 5.0% 35.0% 5.0% 4.2 55.0% 20
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 60.0% 5.0% 4.6 35.0% 20
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 5.0% 45.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.0 30.0% 20
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 5.0% 75.0% 5.0% 4.6 15.0% 20
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 5.0% 50.0% 5.0% 5.0% 4.3 35.0% 20
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 5.0% 55.0% 10.0% 4.3 30.0% 20
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 22268
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
URB 3234: PLANNING FOR HEALTHY CITIES
Response Rate: 17/20Primary Instructor: Day,Kristen
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 17
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 17
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 88.2% 4.9 11.8% 17
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 76.5% 11.8% 4.6 11.8% 17
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 82.4% 4.8 17.6% 17
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 82.4% 4.8 17.6% 17
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 94.1% 4.9 5.9% 17
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 76.5% 4.8 23.5% 17
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 88.2% 4.9 11.8% 17
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 76.5% 5.9% 4.6 17.6% 17
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 94.1% 4.9 5.9% 17
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 82.4% 5.9% 4.8 11.8% 17
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17119
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 2211: Statics Laboratory
Response Rate: 36/37Primary Instructor: Thorsen,Richard S.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
72.2% 5.6% 4.7 22.2% 36
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 60.0% 8.6% 5.7% 4.4 25.7% 35
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 91.7% 5.6% 4.9 2.8% 36
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 91.4% 5.7% 4.9 2.9% 35
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 88.9% 5.6% 4.8 5.6% 36
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 77.1% 5.7% 4.7 17.1% 35
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 63.9% 2.8% 16.7% 4.4 16.7% 36
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 52.8% 8.3% 13.9% 4.2 25.0% 36
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Ability to use experimental methods and techniques for statics problems 71.4% 2.9% 4.7 25.7% 35
Q28 Ability to write technical reports 60.0% 2.9% 4.6 37.1% 35
Q29 Ability to analyze and interpret data in statics problems 60.0% 2.9% 2.9% 4.5 34.3% 35
Q30 Ability to work effectively in teams 74.3% 2.9% 4.7 22.9% 35
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 69.4% 2.8% 11.1% 4.5 16.7% 36
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 91.7% 5.6% 4.9 2.8% 36
Q40 Value was added to my education. 63.9% 2.8% 8.3% 4.5 25.0% 36
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 58.3% 2.8% 5.6% 4.5 33.3% 36
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to
analyze and interpret data
52.9% 2.9% 8.8% 4.4 35.3% 34
A36 I have enhanced my ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams 61.8% 5.9% 4.6 32.4% 34
A39 I have enhanced my ability to communicate effectively 47.1% 8.8% 4.4 44.1% 34
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
55.9% 2.9% 2.9% 4.5 38.2% 34
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 10
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 17296
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 2211: Statics Laboratory
Response Rate: 18/20Primary Instructor: Thorsen,Richard S.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
83.3% 5.6% 4.8 11.1% 18
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 77.8% 5.6% 5.6% 4.8 11.1% 18
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 94.4% 4.9 5.6% 18
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 18
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 88.9% 5.6% 4.8 5.6% 18
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 83.3% 5.6% 4.8 11.1% 18
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 5.6% 72.2% 11.1% 4.4 11.1% 18
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 5.6% 61.1% 5.6% 4.4 27.8% 18
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Ability to use experimental methods and techniques for statics problems 82.4% 4.8 17.6% 17
Q28 Ability to write technical reports 76.5% 4.8 23.5% 17
Q29 Ability to analyze and interpret data in statics problems 82.4% 4.8 17.6% 17
Q30 Ability to work effectively in teams 82.4% 5.9% 4.8 11.8% 17
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 66.7% 11.1% 4.6 22.2% 18
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 18
Q40 Value was added to my education. 5.6% 66.7% 5.6% 4.4 22.2% 18
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 61.1% 5.6% 22.2% 4.3 11.1% 18
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to
analyze and interpret data
75.0% 6.3% 4.7 18.8% 16
A36 I have enhanced my ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams 75.0% 12.5% 4.6 12.5% 16
A39 I have enhanced my ability to communicate effectively 75.0% 6.3% 4.7 18.8% 16
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
75.0% 4.8 25.0% 16
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 10
13-February-2017
Section: C
Class Number: 23733
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 2211: Statics Laboratory
Response Rate: 32/32Primary Instructor: Thorsen,Richard S.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
78.1% 3.1% 4.7 18.8% 32
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 59.4% 6.3% 4.5 34.4% 32
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 84.4% 3.1% 4.8 12.5% 32
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 87.5% 3.1% 4.8 9.4% 32
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 62.5% 3.1% 6.3% 4.5 28.1% 32
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 71.9% 6.3% 4.6 21.9% 32
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 65.6% 3.1% 3.1% 4.6 28.1% 32
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 56.3% 9.4% 6.3% 4.3 28.1% 32
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Ability to use experimental methods and techniques for statics problems 50.0% 10.0% 4.3 40.0% 30
Q28 Ability to write technical reports 50.0% 3.3% 6.7% 4.4 40.0% 30
Q29 Ability to analyze and interpret data in statics problems 48.3% 3.4% 3.4% 4.4 44.8% 29
Q30 Ability to work effectively in teams 3.4% 62.1% 10.3% 4.3 24.1% 29
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 46.9% 3.1% 3.1% 4.4 46.9% 32
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 90.6% 3.1% 4.8 6.3% 32
Q40 Value was added to my education. 62.5% 3.1% 9.4% 4.5 25.0% 32
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 65.6% 3.1% 3.1% 4.6 28.1% 32
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to
analyze and interpret data
53.3% 3.3% 6.7% 4.4 36.7% 30
A36 I have enhanced my ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams 60.0% 10.0% 6.7% 4.3 23.3% 30
A39 I have enhanced my ability to communicate effectively 63.3% 3.3% 16.7% 4.4 16.7% 30
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
63.3% 3.3% 13.3% 4.4 20.0% 30
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 10
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17121
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 3211: Mechanics of Materials Laboratory
Response Rate: 13/15Primary Instructor: Thorsen,Richard S.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
100.0% 5.0 13
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 76.9% 4.8 23.1% 13
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 92.3% 4.9 7.7% 13
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 13
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 92.3% 4.9 7.7% 13
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 84.6% 4.8 15.4% 13
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 76.9% 4.8 23.1% 13
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 69.2% 4.7 30.8% 13
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Ability to use experimental methods and techniques for mechanics of materials
problems
84.6% 4.8 15.4% 13
Q28 Ability to write technical reports 69.2% 4.7 30.8% 13
Q29 Ability to analyze and interpret data in mechanics of materials problems 76.9% 4.8 23.1% 13
Q30 Ability to work effectively in teams 76.9% 15.4% 4.6 7.7% 13
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 84.6% 7.7% 4.8 7.7% 13
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 13
Q40 Value was added to my education. 84.6% 4.8 15.4% 13
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 76.9% 4.8 23.1% 13
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
84.6% 4.8 15.4% 13
A36 I have enhanced my ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams 84.6% 7.7% 7.7% 4.6 13
A39 I have enhanced my ability to communicate effectively 76.9% 7.7% 4.6 15.4% 13
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
76.9% 4.8 23.1% 13
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 10
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17127
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 3411: Automatic Control Laboratory
Response Rate: 29/32Primary Instructor: Thorsen,Richard S.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
3.4% 72.4% 3.4% 4.6 20.7% 29
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 48.3% 17.2% 4.1 34.5% 29
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 3.4% 55.2% 3.4% 3.4% 4.3 34.5% 29
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 3.4% 75.9% 4.7 20.7% 29
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 65.5% 3.4% 6.9% 4.5 24.1% 29
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 3.4% 72.4% 4.6 24.1% 29
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 6.9% 65.5% 3.4% 3.4% 4.3 20.7% 29
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 65.5% 10.3% 6.9% 4.4 17.2% 29
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Applied techniques of mathematical modeling and analysis of dynamic systems to
experimental electro-mechanical systems.
3.6% 57.1% 7.1% 4.4 32.1% 28
Q28 Designed controllers using computer simulations and validated their control
designs on experimental test beds.
3.6% 60.7% 10.7% 4.4 25.0% 28
Q29 Ability to write technical reports 3.6% 60.7% 10.7% 4.4 25.0% 28
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 3.4% 44.8% 10.3% 3.4% 4.1 37.9% 29
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 3.4% 62.1% 3.4% 4.4 31.0% 29
Q40 Value was added to my education. 6.9% 58.6% 4.4 34.5% 29
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 6.9% 55.2% 3.4% 3.4% 4.2 31.0% 29
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to
analyze and interpret data
3.7% 59.3% 3.7% 4.4 33.3% 27
A39 I have enhanced my ability to communicate effectively 3.7% 59.3% 3.7% 3.7% 4.4 29.6% 27
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
3.7% 59.3% 3.7% 3.7% 4.4 29.6% 27
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 5 of 10
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 17301
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 3411: Automatic Control Laboratory
Response Rate: 34/41Primary Instructor: Thorsen,Richard S.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
85.3% 2.9% 4.8 11.8% 34
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 38.2% 2.9% 2.9% 5.9% 4.3 50.0% 34
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.3% 2.9% 4.8 11.8% 34
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 78.8% 3.0% 4.8 18.2% 33
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 79.4% 2.9% 4.8 17.6% 34
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 55.9% 2.9% 11.8% 4.4 29.4% 34
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 58.8% 2.9% 2.9% 5.9% 4.5 29.4% 34
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 61.8% 2.9% 8.8% 4.5 26.5% 34
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Applied techniques of mathematical modeling and analysis of dynamic systems to
experimental electro-mechanical systems.
75.8% 3.0% 4.7 21.2% 33
Q28 Designed controllers using computer simulations and validated their control
designs on experimental test beds.
66.7% 6.1% 4.6 27.3% 33
Q29 Ability to write technical reports 70.6% 5.9% 4.6 23.5% 34
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 52.9% 2.9% 8.8% 4.4 35.3% 34
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 81.8% 3.0% 4.8 15.2% 33
Q40 Value was added to my education. 70.6% 2.9% 4.7 26.5% 34
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 64.7% 2.9% 8.8% 4.6 23.5% 34
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to
analyze and interpret data
61.8% 5.9% 4.6 32.4% 34
A39 I have enhanced my ability to communicate effectively 67.6% 8.8% 4.6 23.5% 34
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
64.7% 2.9% 4.6 32.4% 34
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 6 of 10
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17129
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 3511: Measurement Systems Laboratory
Response Rate: 33/39Primary Instructor: Thorsen,Richard S.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
90.9% 4.9 9.1% 33
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 66.7% 9.1% 6.1% 4.4 18.2% 33
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 84.8% 3.0% 4.9 12.1% 33
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 84.8% 3.0% 4.9 12.1% 33
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 78.8% 3.0% 3.0% 4.8 15.2% 33
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 3.0% 69.7% 9.1% 3.0% 4.4 15.2% 33
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 3.0% 57.6% 6.1% 6.1% 4.3 27.3% 33
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 3.0% 54.5% 6.1% 6.1% 4.3 30.3% 33
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Practiced instrumentation fundamentals to analyze and design measurement
instrumentation.
3.0% 72.7% 6.1% 4.6 18.2% 33
Q28 Exposed to fundamental operational aspects of measurement instruments and
calibrated given measurement devices.
3.0% 72.7% 4.6 24.2% 33
Q29 Utilized modern computer-aided analysis and design tools to perform
measurement system analysis and design and used a computer-based data
acquisition hardware and software to acquire, condition, and analyze experimental
data.
75.8% 6.1% 4.7 18.2% 33
Q30 Ability to write technical reports 3.2% 74.2% 3.2% 3.2% 4.5 16.1% 31
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 60.6% 9.1% 4.4 30.3% 33
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 87.9% 3.0% 4.8 9.1% 33
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.0% 75.8% 3.0% 3.0% 4.6 15.2% 33
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 3.0% 66.7% 6.1% 3.0% 4.4 21.2% 33
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to
analyze and interpret data
63.6% 3.0% 6.1% 4.5 27.3% 33
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
63.6% 3.0% 3.0% 4.5 30.3% 33
A39 I have enhanced my ability to communicate effectively 69.7% 12.1% 4.6 18.2% 33
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
69.7% 3.0% 3.0% 4.6 24.2% 33
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 7 of 10
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 23732
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 6043: Transport Phenomena
Response Rate: 23/32Primary Instructor: Thorsen,Richard S.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 23
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 23
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 23
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 95.7% 5.0 4.3% 23
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 78.3% 4.3% 4.7 17.4% 23
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 82.6% 4.8 17.4% 23
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 95.7% 5.0 4.3% 23
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 56.5% 4.3% 4.3% 4.4 34.8% 23
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 60.9% 4.3% 8.7% 4.4 26.1% 23
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 69.6% 4.3% 4.7 26.1% 23
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 95.7% 5.0 4.3% 23
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 69.6% 8.7% 4.5 21.7% 23
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 8 of 10
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17154
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
MT 2811: Materials Science Laboratory
Response Rate: 1/8Primary Instructor: Thorsen,Richard S.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
100.0% 5.0 1
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 100.0% 5.0 1
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 1
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 1
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.0 100.0% 1
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 3.0 1
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learned the principles of Optical and scanning electron microscopy of materials 100.0% 5.0 1
Q28 Learned how to measure hardness and tensile strength 4.0 100.0% 1
Q29 Learn how to determine the crystal structure of materials 4.0 100.0% 1
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 1
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 1
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 4.0 100.0% 1
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
4.0 100.0% 1
A48 I have enhanced my ability to apply principles of engineering, basic science, and
mathematics (including multivariate calculus and differential equations) to model,
analyze, design, and realize physical systems, components or processes
4.0 100.0% 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 9 of 10
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 22345
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
MT 2811: Materials Science Laboratory
Response Rate: 4/6Primary Instructor: Thorsen,Richard S.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
100.0% 5.0 4
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 25.0% 75.0% 4.0 4
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 4
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 33.3% 66.7% 3.7 3
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 33.3% 66.7% 3.7 3
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 2.5 25.0% 4
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learned the principles of Optical and scanning electron microscopy of materials 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q28 Learned how to measure hardness and tensile strength 100.0% 5.0 4
Q29 Learn how to determine the crystal structure of materials 100.0% 5.0 4
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 75.0% 25.0% 4.5 4
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 4
Q40 Value was added to my education. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 3.3 25.0% 4
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
25.0% 75.0% 4.0 4
A48 I have enhanced my ability to apply principles of engineering, basic science, and
mathematics (including multivariate calculus and differential equations) to model,
analyze, design, and realize physical systems, components or processes
25.0% 75.0% 4.0 4
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 10 of 10
13-February-2017
Section: ALAB
Class Number: 17117
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 2112: COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN
Response Rate: 13/24Primary Instructor: DiZinno,Nicholas A.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
61.5% 15.4% 4.5 23.1% 13
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 46.2% 4.5 53.8% 13
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 76.9% 7.7% 4.7 15.4% 13
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 61.5% 7.7% 7.7% 4.4 23.1% 13
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 46.2% 7.7% 7.7% 4.2 38.5% 13
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 7.7% 15.4% 15.4% 3.6 61.5% 13
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 53.8% 15.4% 4.4 30.8% 13
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 38.5% 7.7% 15.4% 4.3 38.5% 13
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learned how to use a state of the art commercial CAD software. 61.5% 4.6 38.5% 13
Q28 Understood multiview drawings and the concepts of sectioning and isometric
drawing.
61.5% 4.6 38.5% 13
Q29 Learned about dimensioning and tolerancing, and standards and specifications in
drawing
53.8% 4.5 46.2% 13
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 38.5% 4.4 61.5% 13
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 7.7% 53.8% 7.7% 4.2 30.8% 13
Q40 Value was added to my education. 61.5% 7.7% 4.5 30.8% 13
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 61.5% 4.6 38.5% 13
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 53.8% 4.5 46.2% 13
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
61.5% 4.6 38.5% 13
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
69.2% 4.7 30.8% 13
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17118
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 2112: COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN
Response Rate: 18/32Primary Instructor: DiZinno,Nicholas A.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 11.1% 88.9% 18
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 17.6% 82.4% 17
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 18
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 41.2% 11.8% 5.9% 4.1 41.2% 17
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 11.1% 16.7% 16.7% 3.6 55.6% 18
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 5.6% 50.0% 5.6% 5.6% 4.2 33.3% 18
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 61.1% 5.6% 4.5 33.3% 18
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 5.9% 35.3% 5.9% 17.6% 3.9 35.3% 17
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learned how to use a state of the art commercial CAD software. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 18
Q28 Understood multiview drawings and the concepts of sectioning and isometric
drawing.
61.1% 4.6 38.9% 18
Q29 Learned about dimensioning and tolerancing, and standards and specifications in
drawing
44.4% 4.4 55.6% 18
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 18
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 66.7% 5.6% 4.6 27.8% 18
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 44.4% 5.6% 4.4 50.0% 18
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
50.0% 4.5 50.0% 18
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
66.7% 4.7 33.3% 18
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: BLAB
Class Number: 17242
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 2112: COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN
Response Rate: 5/8Primary Instructor: DiZinno,Nicholas A.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
40.0% 20.0% 4.2 40.0% 5
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 5
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 5
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 20.0% 40.0% 3.2 40.0% 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 2.8 40.0% 5
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learned how to use a state of the art commercial CAD software. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
Q28 Understood multiview drawings and the concepts of sectioning and isometric
drawing.
60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
Q29 Learned about dimensioning and tolerancing, and standards and specifications in
drawing
40.0% 4.4 60.0% 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 40.0% 20.0% 4.0 40.0% 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 60.0% 20.0% 4.2 20.0% 5
Q40 Value was added to my education. 60.0% 20.0% 4.2 20.0% 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 60.0% 20.0% 4.2 20.0% 5
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 22258
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
PL 2254: Science and Pseudoscience
Response Rate: 23/28Primary Instructor: Caomhanach,Nuala
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 95.7% 4.3% 23
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 22
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 4.3% 95.7% 4.8 23
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 4.3% 91.3% 4.3% 4.7 23
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 65.2% 4.7 34.8% 23
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 87.0% 4.9 13.0% 23
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 87.0% 4.9 13.0% 23
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 82.6% 8.7% 4.7 8.7% 23
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 78.3% 4.3% 4.7 17.4% 23
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 87.0% 4.9 13.0% 23
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 95.7% 5.0 4.3% 23
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 91.3% 4.9 8.7% 23
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: C
Class Number: 23798
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 1123: Visual Foundation Studio
Response Rate: 13/19Primary Instructor: Song,Ji-young
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 92.3% 7.7% 13
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 92.3% 7.7% 13
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 12
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 13
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 58.3% 4.6 41.7% 12
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 53.8% 7.7% 4.5 38.5% 13
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 53.8% 4.5 46.2% 13
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 46.2% 7.7% 7.7% 4.2 38.5% 13
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 61.5% 4.6 38.5% 13
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 76.9% 7.7% 4.7 15.4% 13
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 69.2% 7.7% 4.6 23.1% 13
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 76.9% 4.8 23.1% 13
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17098
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 3224: INTRO TO OPERATING SYSTM
Response Rate: 6/70Primary Instructor: Dolan-Gavitt,Brendan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 6
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 83.3% 16.7% 4.5 6
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16318
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 6383: High-Speed Networks
Response Rate: 62/100Primary Instructor: Xu,Yang
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 1.6% 98.4% 62
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 6.5% 93.5% 62
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 1.6% 77.4% 4.7 21.0% 62
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 1.6% 75.8% 9.7% 4.6 12.9% 62
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.8% 45.2% 4.8% 9.7% 4.1 35.5% 62
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 59.7% 4.8% 3.2% 4.5 32.3% 62
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 1.6% 59.7% 1.6% 4.8% 4.5 32.3% 62
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 1.6% 48.4% 1.6% 14.5% 4.3 33.9% 62
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 1.6% 51.6% 3.2% 9.7% 4.3 33.9% 62
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 1.6% 59.7% 9.7% 4.5 29.0% 62
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 1.6% 58.1% 11.3% 4.4 29.0% 62
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 1.6% 62.9% 4.8% 4.5 30.6% 62
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16624
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6971: SEL TOPICS IN FINANCIAL ENGR
Response Rate: 13/21Primary Instructor: Hayes,Michael
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 15.4% 76.9% 7.7% 13
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 23.1% 61.5% 15.4% 13
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 46.2% 15.4% 15.4% 4.4 23.1% 13
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 46.2% 7.7% 7.7% 4.4 38.5% 13
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 53.8% 15.4% 7.7% 15.4% 4.3 7.7% 13
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 46.2% 30.8% 23.1% 4.3 13
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 46.2% 7.7% 15.4% 4.3 30.8% 13
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 23.1% 7.7% 7.7% 15.4% 3.9 46.2% 13
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 53.8% 7.7% 7.7% 15.4% 4.3 15.4% 13
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 46.2% 7.7% 4.5 46.2% 13
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 53.8% 7.7% 15.4% 4.4 23.1% 13
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 53.8% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 4.3 23.1% 13
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: BLEC
Class Number: 17598
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 1124: Object Oriented Programming
Response Rate: 29/46Primary Instructor: Katz-Braunschweig,Daniel
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 3.7% 96.3% 27
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 96.3% 3.7% 27
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 74.1% 3.7% 3.7% 4.7 18.5% 27
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 66.7% 7.4% 7.4% 4.6 18.5% 27
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 37.0% 3.7% 11.1% 4.2 48.1% 27
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 3.7% 40.7% 3.7% 7.4% 7.4% 4.1 37.0% 27
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 7.4% 48.1% 3.7% 3.7% 7.4% 4.1 29.6% 27
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 7.4% 22.2% 7.4% 11.1% 29.6% 3.4 22.2% 27
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 You were taught the fundamentals of object-oriented thinking, design and
programming.
3.4% 69.0% 3.4% 4.6 24.1% 29
Q28 You were taught the details and correct use of the C programming language. 3.4% 55.2% 6.9% 10.3% 4.2 24.1% 29
Q29 Your ability to program has increased. 3.4% 72.4% 3.4% 3.4% 4.5 17.2% 29
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 7.4% 40.7% 22.2% 3.7% 3.7 25.9% 27
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 70.4% 3.7% 3.7% 4.7 22.2% 27
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 7.4% 51.9% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 4.2 29.6% 27
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 44.4% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 4.3 44.4% 27
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
3.4% 58.6% 3.4% 3.4% 4.4 31.0% 29
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 3.4% 48.3% 3.4% 4.3 44.8% 29
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 6.9% 37.9% 10.3% 24.1% 3.7 20.7% 29
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
3.4% 41.4% 6.9% 6.9% 4.1 41.4% 29
Y. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 6.9% 37.9% 13.8% 13.8% 3.8 27.6% 29
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 6.9% 44.8% 6.9% 10.3% 4.0 31.0% 29
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 10.3% 34.5% 6.9% 10.3% 3.8 37.9% 29
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
10.3% 37.9% 3.4% 3.4% 24.1% 3.8 20.7% 29
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 7
13-February-2017
Section: BLEC
Class Number: 17598
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 1124: Object Oriented Programming
Response Rate: 29/46Primary Instructor: Katz-Braunschweig,Daniel
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
Y. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 3.4% 27.6% 3.4% 48.3% 3.7 17.2% 29
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 10.3% 24.1% 3.4% 27.6% 3.6 34.5% 29
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 7
13-February-2017
Section: FLEC
Class Number: 17600
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 1124: Object Oriented Programming
Response Rate: 25/45Primary Instructor: Katz-Braunschweig,Daniel
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 8.0% 88.0% 4.0% 25
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 4.0% 96.0% 25
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 4.0% 68.0% 4.0% 4.5 24.0% 25
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 4.0% 56.0% 4.4 40.0% 25
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.0% 48.0% 4.0% 8.0% 4.2 36.0% 25
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 8.3% 37.5% 8.3% 12.5% 3.8 33.3% 24
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 4.0% 36.0% 16.0% 4.1 44.0% 25
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.0% 36.0% 4.0% 32.0% 3.8 24.0% 25
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 You were taught the fundamentals of object-oriented thinking, design and
programming.
4.0% 64.0% 4.5 32.0% 25
Q28 You were taught the details and correct use of the C programming language. 8.0% 48.0% 8.0% 4.2 36.0% 25
Q29 Your ability to program has increased. 4.0% 56.0% 8.0% 4.4 32.0% 25
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.0% 36.0% 28.0% 12.0% 3.6 20.0% 25
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.0% 52.0% 12.0% 4.3 32.0% 25
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 4.0% 52.0% 4.0% 20.0% 4.1 20.0% 25
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.0% 48.0% 12.0% 12.0% 4.0 24.0% 25
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
4.0% 36.0% 12.0% 4.1 48.0% 25
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 4.0% 44.0% 20.0% 4.1 32.0% 25
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 4.0% 36.0% 4.0% 32.0% 3.8 24.0% 25
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
4.0% 44.0% 4.0% 24.0% 4.0 24.0% 25
Y. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 4.0% 32.0% 8.0% 12.0% 3.9 44.0% 25
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 4.0% 32.0% 4.0% 4.2 60.0% 25
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 8.0% 40.0% 4.0% 8.0% 4.0 40.0% 25
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
8.0% 28.0% 8.0% 28.0% 3.6 28.0% 25
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 7
13-February-2017
Section: FLEC
Class Number: 17600
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 1124: Object Oriented Programming
Response Rate: 25/45Primary Instructor: Katz-Braunschweig,Daniel
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
Y. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 8.0% 28.0% 4.0% 4.0% 36.0% 3.6 20.0% 25
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 4.0% 28.0% 8.0% 32.0% 3.7 28.0% 25
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 7
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 17075
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 3913: JAVA AND WEB DESIGN
Response Rate: 63/65Primary Instructor: Katz-Braunschweig,Daniel
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 96.8% 3.2% 62
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 95.1% 4.9% 61
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 1.6% 57.1% 1.6% 1.6% 3.2% 4.5 34.9% 63
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 4.8% 39.7% 3.2% 3.2% 27.0% 3.9 22.2% 63
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 44.4% 9.5% 3.2% 14.3% 15.9% 2.3 12.7% 63
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 1.6% 34.9% 3.2% 11.1% 15.9% 3.9 33.3% 63
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 3.2% 33.3% 3.2% 7.9% 15.9% 3.9 36.5% 63
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.8% 34.9% 4.8% 9.5% 27.0% 3.7 19.0% 63
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 1.6% 34.9% 3.2% 3.2% 11.1% 4.1 46.0% 63
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.2% 38.1% 4.8% 1.6% 17.5% 4.1 34.9% 63
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 4.8% 44.4% 4.8% 1.6% 11.1% 4.2 33.3% 63
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 3.2% 42.9% 4.8% 4.8% 9.5% 4.2 34.9% 63
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 5 of 7
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16239
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6233: Introduction to Operating Systems
Response Rate: 41/46Primary Instructor: Katz-Braunschweig,Daniel
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 41
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.0% 95.0% 40
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 2.4% 56.1% 7.3% 4.9% 4.3 29.3% 41
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 2.6% 48.7% 2.6% 10.3% 4.3 35.9% 39
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 19.5% 24.4% 34.1% 9.8% 2.9 12.2% 41
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 41.5% 2.4% 26.8% 4.1 29.3% 41
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 2.4% 43.9% 2.4% 7.3% 4.2 43.9% 41
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 2.4% 39.0% 4.9% 24.4% 4.0 29.3% 41
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 36.6% 9.8% 9.8% 4.1 43.9% 41
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 46.3% 7.3% 2.4% 4.3 43.9% 41
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 46.3% 19.5% 7.3% 4.0 26.8% 41
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 2.4% 43.9% 7.3% 14.6% 4.1 31.7% 41
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 6 of 7
13-February-2017
Section: INT2
Class Number: 16828
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6233: Introduction to Operating Systems
Response Rate: 12/14Primary Instructor: Katz-Braunschweig,Daniel
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 12
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 12
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 75.0% 8.3% 4.6 16.7% 12
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 75.0% 16.7% 4.4 8.3% 12
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 8.3% 41.7% 8.3% 8.3% 3.9 33.3% 12
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 58.3% 16.7% 4.4 25.0% 12
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 8.3% 75.0% 4.5 16.7% 12
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 8.3% 66.7% 4.4 25.0% 12
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
83.3% 8.3% 4.7 8.3% 12
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 12
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
75.0% 4.8 25.0% 12
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 75.0% 8.3% 4.6 16.7% 12
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 50.0% 41.7% 4.1 8.3% 12
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 50.0% 41.7% 4.1 8.3% 12
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 58.3% 33.3% 4.3 8.3% 12
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 75.0% 16.7% 4.4 8.3% 12
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 66.7% 8.3% 8.3% 4.4 16.7% 12
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 41.7% 4.4 58.3% 12
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 75.0% 8.3% 4.6 16.7% 12
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 66.7% 8.3% 4.5 25.0% 12
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 58.3% 8.3% 4.4 33.3% 12
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 7 of 7
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17038
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 4204: Management Science
Response Rate: 14/38Primary Instructor: Brabazon,Kevin
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 14.3% 85.7% 14
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 15.4% 76.9% 7.7% 13
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 42.9% 7.1% 4.3 50.0% 14
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 7.1% 42.9% 7.1% 4.1 42.9% 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 7.1% 21.4% 42.9% 21.4% 2.9 7.1% 14
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 7.1% 50.0% 7.1% 4.2 35.7% 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 7.1% 21.4% 21.4% 3.8 50.0% 14
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 7.1% 35.7% 7.1% 21.4% 3.8 28.6% 14
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 7.1% 28.6% 21.4% 3.9 42.9% 14
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
7.1% 21.4% 14.3% 3.9 57.1% 14
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
7.1% 21.4% 7.1% 7.1% 3.8 57.1% 14
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
14.3% 28.6% 35.7% 3.5 21.4% 14
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 7.1% 28.6% 7.1% 21.4% 3.7 35.7% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 7.1% 42.9% 7.1% 4.1 42.9% 14
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 7.1% 35.7% 21.4% 3.9 35.7% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 7.1% 14.3% 28.6% 3.6 50.0% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16756
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6731: Basel 3 & Banking Assets Management
Response Rate: 7/12Primary Instructor: Makarov,Victor
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 14.3% 85.7% 7
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 14.3% 85.7% 7
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 71.4% 14.3% 4.6 14.3% 7
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 85.7% 14.3% 4.7 7
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 85.7% 14.3% 4.7 7
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 85.7% 14.3% 4.7 7
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 7
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 71.4% 14.3% 4.4 14.3% 7
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 71.4% 14.3% 4.4 14.3% 7
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 71.4% 14.3% 4.4 14.3% 7
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17699
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 4793: Computer Networking
Response Rate: 37/52Primary Instructor: Portnoy,Rafail
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 2.7% 97.3% 37
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 2.8% 97.2% 36
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 2.7% 67.6% 4.6 29.7% 37
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 2.7% 67.6% 2.7% 2.7% 4.6 24.3% 37
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 2.7% 78.4% 2.7% 4.7 16.2% 37
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 2.7% 59.5% 2.7% 2.7% 4.4 32.4% 37
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 5.4% 56.8% 5.4% 2.7% 4.3 29.7% 37
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 5.4% 64.9% 10.8% 4.4 18.9% 37
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I am comfortable using network tools such as Wireshark to measure and monitor
network performance
75.9% 4.8 24.1% 29
Q28 I am comfortable with describing Internet protocol structure including the
application layer, transport layer, network layer and link layers.
65.5% 4.7 34.5% 29
Q29 I am comfortable with the configuration and operation of the network layer
including forwarding, router architecture, the IP protocol and routing protocols
including OSPF and BGP.
3.4% 44.8% 10.3% 6.9% 4.1 34.5% 29
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 2.7% 40.5% 5.4% 10.8% 4.1 40.5% 37
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 5.4% 54.1% 5.4% 4.3 35.1% 37
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 2.8% 63.9% 5.6% 2.8% 4.4 25.0% 36
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 5.6% 52.8% 5.6% 5.6% 4.2 30.6% 36
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16289
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6843: Computer Networking
Response Rate: 17/28Primary Instructor: Portnoy,Rafail
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 17
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 17
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 70.6% 5.9% 4.8 23.5% 17
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 47.1% 11.8% 4.4 41.2% 17
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 76.5% 5.9% 4.7 17.6% 17
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 70.6% 5.9% 4.6 23.5% 17
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 70.6% 11.8% 4.6 17.6% 17
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 70.6% 4.7 29.4% 17
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I am comfortable using network tools such as Wireshark to measure and monitor
network performance
94.1% 4.9 5.9% 17
Q28 I am comfortable with describing Internet protocol structure including the
application layer, transport layer, network layer and link layers.
88.2% 4.9 11.8% 17
Q29 I am comfortable with the configuration and operation of the network layer
including forwarding, router architecture, the IP protocol and routing protocols
including OSPF and BGP.
58.8% 5.9% 4.5 35.3% 17
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 76.5% 5.9% 4.7 17.6% 17
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 88.2% 4.9 11.8% 17
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
70.6% 11.8% 4.5 17.6% 17
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 82.4% 11.8% 4.7 5.9% 17
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
58.8% 5.9% 4.5 35.3% 17
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 58.8% 5.9% 4.5 35.3% 17
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 70.6% 4.7 29.4% 17
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 47.1% 5.9% 29.4% 4.1 17.6% 17
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 47.1% 35.3% 4.1 17.6% 17
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 47.1% 5.9% 41.2% 3.9 5.9% 17
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 5.9% 76.5% 5.9% 4.5 11.8% 17
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 5.9% 76.5% 5.9% 4.5 11.8% 17
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 52.9% 4.5 47.1% 17
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16289
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6843: Computer Networking
Response Rate: 17/28Primary Instructor: Portnoy,Rafail
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 70.6% 5.9% 5.9% 4.6 17.6% 17
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 82.4% 4.8 17.6% 17
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 70.6% 5.9% 4.6 23.5% 17
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16708
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6843: Computer Networking
Response Rate: 37/52Primary Instructor: Portnoy,Rafail
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 2.7% 97.3% 37
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 2.8% 97.2% 36
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 2.7% 67.6% 4.6 29.7% 37
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 2.7% 67.6% 2.7% 2.7% 4.6 24.3% 37
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 2.7% 78.4% 2.7% 4.7 16.2% 37
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 2.7% 59.5% 2.7% 2.7% 4.4 32.4% 37
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 5.4% 56.8% 5.4% 2.7% 4.3 29.7% 37
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 5.4% 64.9% 10.8% 4.4 18.9% 37
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I am comfortable using network tools such as Wireshark to measure and monitor
network performance
75.9% 4.8 24.1% 29
Q28 I am comfortable with describing Internet protocol structure including the
application layer, transport layer, network layer and link layers.
65.5% 4.7 34.5% 29
Q29 I am comfortable with the configuration and operation of the network layer
including forwarding, router architecture, the IP protocol and routing protocols
including OSPF and BGP.
3.4% 44.8% 10.3% 6.9% 4.1 34.5% 29
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 2.7% 40.5% 5.4% 10.8% 4.1 40.5% 37
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 5.4% 54.1% 5.4% 4.3 35.1% 37
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 2.8% 63.9% 5.6% 2.8% 4.4 25.0% 36
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 5.6% 52.8% 5.6% 5.6% 4.2 30.6% 36
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: LCLB
Class Number: 17450
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 4153: STRUCTURAL DESIGN PROJECT
Response Rate: 10/17Primary Instructor: Shleykov,Ilya Borisovich
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 10
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 10
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 10.0% 50.0% 20.0% 10.0% 3.7 10.0% 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 70.0% 20.0% 4.5 10.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 80.0% 20.0% 4.6 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 10
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
10.0% 60.0% 4.3 30.0% 10
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 10.0% 60.0% 10.0% 4.2 20.0% 10
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
10.0% 70.0% 4.4 20.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: ALAB
Class Number: 17079
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 1002: Introduction to Civil Engineering
Response Rate: 16/19Primary Instructor: Ulerio,Jose Miguel
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
68.8% 18.8% 4.5 12.5% 16
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 68.8% 12.5% 4.4 18.8% 16
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 81.3% 4.8 18.8% 16
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 93.8% 4.9 6.3% 16
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 62.5% 12.5% 4.4 25.0% 16
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 75.0% 12.5% 4.5 12.5% 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 62.5% 6.3% 6.3% 4.4 25.0% 16
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 25.0% 12.5% 31.3% 3.7 31.3% 16
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I now have a thorough understanding of the sub-disciplines of civil engineering and
professional roles of civil engineers.
68.8% 4.7 31.3% 16
Q28 I now have an understanding of the importance of professional ethics, and the
many ways it impacts the profession, its practice, and society in general.
56.3% 6.3% 4.5 37.5% 16
Q29 I have gained an understanding of the different types of roles and employers that
civil engineers may be engaged in the profession.
62.5% 4.6 37.5% 16
Q30 I developed computational and communication skills. 37.5% 6.3% 12.5% 4.1 43.8% 16
Q31 I now have a general understanding of the fundamental concepts of GIS and
AutoCAD.
68.8% 4.7 31.3% 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 6.3% 12.5% 4.3 31.3% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 68.8% 6.3% 4.6 25.0% 16
Q40 Value was added to my education. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 62.5% 12.5% 4.5 25.0% 16
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A38 I have enhanced my ability to develop an understanding of professional and ethical
responsibility
50.0% 12.5% 4.4 37.5% 16
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 6.3% 31.3% 12.5% 25.0% 3.6 25.0% 16
A40 I have enhanced my ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
global and societal context
37.5% 6.3% 12.5% 4.1 43.8% 16
A41 I have enhanced my ability to develop a recognition of the need for, and an ability
to engage in life-long learning
50.0% 6.3% 12.5% 4.3 31.3% 16
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: BLAB
Class Number: 17205
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 1002: Introduction to Civil Engineering
Response Rate: 11/11Primary Instructor: Ulerio,Jose Miguel
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
100.0% 5.0 11
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 63.6% 9.1% 4.5 27.3% 11
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 11
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 36.4% 18.2% 4.0 45.5% 11
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 11
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I now have a thorough understanding of the sub-disciplines of civil engineering and
professional roles of civil engineers.
81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
Q28 I now have an understanding of the importance of professional ethics, and the
many ways it impacts the profession, its practice, and society in general.
90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
Q29 I have gained an understanding of the different types of roles and employers that
civil engineers may be engaged in the profession.
72.7% 4.7 27.3% 11
Q30 I developed computational and communication skills. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
Q31 I now have a general understanding of the fundamental concepts of GIS and
AutoCAD.
90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 36.4% 27.3% 3.8 36.4% 11
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 72.7% 9.1% 4.6 18.2% 11
Q40 Value was added to my education. 63.6% 4.6 36.4% 11
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 45.5% 18.2% 18.2% 3.9 18.2% 11
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A38 I have enhanced my ability to develop an understanding of professional and ethical
responsibility
80.0% 4.8 20.0% 10
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 60.0% 10.0% 4.5 30.0% 10
A40 I have enhanced my ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
global and societal context
70.0% 4.7 30.0% 10
A41 I have enhanced my ability to develop a recognition of the need for, and an ability
to engage in life-long learning
80.0% 20.0% 4.6 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17580
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 2343: Transportation Engineering
Response Rate: 16/16Primary Instructor: Ulerio,Jose Miguel
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 16
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 15
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 81.3% 4.8 18.8% 16
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 86.7% 4.9 13.3% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 16
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 16
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 62.5% 12.5% 4.5 25.0% 16
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have enhanced by ability to apply mathematics, science and engineering
techniques to solve transportation related problems in transportation planning and
highway design.
53.3% 4.5 46.7% 15
Q28 I have enhanced by ability to perform basic freeway segments capacity analysis. 40.0% 6.7% 4.3 53.3% 15
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the transportation planning process. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 15
Q30 I have enhanced by ability to perform basic engineering economic analysis. 60.0% 6.7% 4.5 33.3% 15
Q31 I have enhanced my knowledge of contemporary issues. 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 15
Q32 I learned to use Autodesk Civil 3D to perform parking layout design, as well as
horizontal and vertical alignments
46.7% 26.7% 4.2 26.7% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 31.3% 25.0% 3.8 43.8% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 37.5% 6.3% 4.3 56.3% 16
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 81.3% 4.8 18.8% 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 6.3% 43.8% 6.3% 6.3% 4.1 37.5% 16
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
26.7% 13.3% 4.1 60.0% 15
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 40.0% 13.3% 4.3 46.7% 15
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
33.3% 4.3 66.7% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16800
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6303: OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
Response Rate: 23/25Primary Instructor: Veeraiah,Vivek
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 4.3% 95.7% 23
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 17.4% 82.6% 23
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 8.7% 26.1% 13.0% 8.7% 3.7 43.5% 23
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 9.1% 27.3% 4.5% 27.3% 3.6 31.8% 22
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 8.7% 30.4% 26.1% 8.7% 3.4 26.1% 23
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 8.7% 30.4% 13.0% 13.0% 3.7 34.8% 23
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 4.3% 30.4% 4.3% 17.4% 3.9 43.5% 23
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 8.7% 26.1% 13.0% 8.7% 3.7 43.5% 23
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 4.5% 27.3% 18.2% 22.7% 3.5 27.3% 22
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
4.3% 21.7% 8.7% 8.7% 3.8 56.5% 23
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
4.3% 21.7% 4.3% 13.0% 3.9 56.5% 23
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
4.3% 30.4% 4.3% 4.3% 4.0 56.5% 23
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 4.3% 26.1% 13.0% 26.1% 3.6 30.4% 23
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 17.4% 21.7% 13.0% 26.1% 3.2 21.7% 23
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
8.7% 34.8% 17.4% 17.4% 3.6 21.7% 23
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 8.7% 17.4% 17.4% 17.4% 3.4 39.1% 23
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
4.3% 26.1% 17.4% 13.0% 3.7 39.1% 23
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 30.4% 17.4% 4.1 52.2% 23
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 4.3% 26.1% 13.0% 4.0 56.5% 23
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 34.8% 8.7% 17.4% 4.2 39.1% 23
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 34.8% 8.7% 26.1% 4.1 30.4% 23
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 34.8% 4.3% 26.1% 4.1 34.8% 23
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 13.0% 21.7% 13.0% 17.4% 3.4 34.8% 23
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 8.7% 17.4% 21.7% 17.4% 3.3 34.8% 23
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 8.7% 13.0% 21.7% 17.4% 3.3 39.1% 23
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16800
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6303: OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
Response Rate: 23/25Primary Instructor: Veeraiah,Vivek
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.3% 21.7% 13.0% 21.7% 3.6 39.1% 23
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 17.4% 13.0% 8.7% 21.7% 3.2 39.1% 23
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 13.0% 26.1% 13.0% 17.4% 3.4 30.4% 23
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: EMT2
Class Number: 21578
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 9503: MOT Capstone Project Course
Response Rate: 12/17Primary Instructor: Veeraiah,Vivek
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 12
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 12
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 91.7% 4.9 8.3% 12
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 12
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 83.3% 8.3% 4.8 8.3% 12
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 91.7% 4.9 8.3% 12
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 83.3% 8.3% 4.8 8.3% 12
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 12
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
91.7% 4.9 8.3% 12
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
91.7% 4.9 8.3% 12
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
66.7% 4.7 33.3% 12
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 91.7% 4.9 8.3% 12
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 12
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 12
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17206
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 3122: STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS
Response Rate: 9/9Primary Instructor: Ghandehari,Masoud
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 22.2% 55.6% 22.2% 9
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 9
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 44.4% 11.1% 4.2 44.4% 9
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 22.2% 11.1% 44.4% 3.6 22.2% 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 3.5 25.0% 8
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 37.5% 4.4 62.5% 8
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 22.2% 33.3% 33.3% 3.2 11.1% 9
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 11.1% 22.2% 11.1% 33.3% 3.3 22.2% 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 22.2% 22.2% 44.4% 3.3 11.1% 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 22.2% 11.1% 11.1% 3.9 55.6% 9
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 22.2% 33.3% 33.3% 3.2 11.1% 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 22.2% 22.2% 44.4% 3.3 11.1% 9
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 25.0% 12.5% 12.5% 3.9 50.0% 8
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16754
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6711: Quantitative Portfolio Management
Response Rate: 5/6Primary Instructor: Ndiaye,Papa Momar
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 5
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 40.0% 20.0% 4.2 40.0% 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 40.0% 20.0% 4.2 40.0% 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 16542
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6303: OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
Response Rate: 22/29Primary Instructor: Fazio,James
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 22
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 21
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 77.3% 4.8 22.7% 22
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 77.3% 4.8 22.7% 22
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 86.4% 4.5% 4.8 9.1% 22
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 68.2% 4.5% 9.1% 4.5 18.2% 22
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 63.6% 4.6 36.4% 22
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 22
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 50.0% 5.0% 4.5 45.0% 20
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
60.0% 4.6 40.0% 20
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
60.0% 5.0% 4.6 35.0% 20
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
50.0% 4.5 50.0% 20
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 63.6% 9.1% 4.5 27.3% 22
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 68.2% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5 22.7% 22
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 68.2% 4.7 31.8% 22
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 72.7% 4.5% 4.7 22.7% 22
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16789
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BE 6453: Probability and Stochastic Processes
Response Rate: 15/22Primary Instructor: Lu,I-Tai
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 15
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 73.3% 6.7% 4.7 20.0% 15
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 60.0% 6.7% 20.0% 4.3 13.3% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 6.7% 73.3% 4.5 20.0% 15
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 53.3% 4.5 46.7% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 53.3% 4.5 46.7% 15
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 60.0% 6.7% 6.7% 4.4 26.7% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 46.7% 6.7% 4.4 46.7% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 15
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 60.0% 13.3% 4.5 26.7% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16790
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 6013: Digital Communications
Response Rate: 25/27Primary Instructor: Lu,I-Tai
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 25
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 24
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 56.0% 4.0% 4.0% 8.0% 4.4 28.0% 25
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 56.0% 4.0% 4.0% 12.0% 4.4 24.0% 25
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.0% 72.0% 4.0% 4.6 20.0% 25
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 78.3% 8.7% 4.7 13.0% 23
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 12.0% 44.0% 4.0% 4.0% 12.0% 3.9 24.0% 25
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 8.0% 52.0% 12.0% 4.2 28.0% 25
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 8.0% 44.0% 4.0% 16.0% 4.0 28.0% 25
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 8.0% 40.0% 12.0% 4.0 40.0% 25
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 8.0% 40.0% 20.0% 4.0 32.0% 25
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 8.0% 40.0% 4.0% 16.0% 4.0 32.0% 25
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16793
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 6303: Probability and Stochastic Processes
Response Rate: 15/22Primary Instructor: Lu,I-Tai
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 15
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 73.3% 6.7% 4.7 20.0% 15
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 60.0% 6.7% 20.0% 4.3 13.3% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 6.7% 73.3% 4.5 20.0% 15
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 53.3% 4.5 46.7% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 53.3% 4.5 46.7% 15
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 60.0% 6.7% 6.7% 4.4 26.7% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 46.7% 6.7% 4.4 46.7% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 15
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 60.0% 13.3% 4.5 26.7% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 17656
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 2114: Calculus III: Multi-Dimensional Calculus
Response Rate: 2/37Primary Instructor: Medina,Luciano Manuel
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 2
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 2
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 2
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
100.0% 3.0 2
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 50.0% 50.0% 1.5 2
Q29 I need more HW problems. 50.0% 50.0% 2.5 2
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: E2
Class Number: 17661
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 2114: Calculus III: Multi-Dimensional Calculus
Response Rate: 3/35Primary Instructor: Medina,Luciano Manuel
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 3
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 3
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 33.3% 33.3% 4.0 33.3% 3
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 33.3% 33.3% 4.0 33.3% 3
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 33.3% 4.3 3
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
33.3% 33.3% 4.0 33.3% 3
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 2.0 3
Q29 I need more HW problems. 33.3% 66.7% 3.0 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 2.7 3
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 33.3% 3.7 66.7% 3
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 33.3% 33.3% 3.7 33.3% 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: CREC
Class Number: 23926
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 1213: MOTION AND SOUND
Response Rate: 14/26Primary Instructor: Hegde,Suryanarayan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 50.0% 14.3% 7.1% 4.1 28.6% 14
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
71.4% 7.1% 21.4% 4.4 14
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 50.0% 14.3% 4.4 35.7% 14
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 7.1% 71.4% 4.5 21.4% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 22451
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 9623: SELECTED TOPCS IN POWER ENGR
Response Rate: 13/13Primary Instructor: Babaei,Saman
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 12
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 13
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 61.5% 7.7% 4.5 30.8% 13
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 61.5% 15.4% 4.5 23.1% 13
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 46.2% 23.1% 4.2 30.8% 13
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 61.5% 4.6 38.5% 13
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 61.5% 4.6 38.5% 13
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 38.5% 15.4% 4.2 46.2% 13
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 38.5% 7.7% 4.3 53.8% 13
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 76.9% 7.7% 4.7 15.4% 13
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 61.5% 4.6 38.5% 13
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 61.5% 4.6 38.5% 13
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16213
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 8711: INTRO TO ENTREPRENEURIAL FINANCE
Response Rate: 9/18Primary Instructor: Brooks,Gary
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 9
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 11.1% 88.9% 9
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 44.4% 4.4 55.6% 9
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 44.4% 11.1% 4.3 44.4% 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 77.8% 11.1% 11.1% 4.6 9
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 44.4% 11.1% 11.1% 4.3 33.3% 9
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 44.4% 22.2% 4.0 33.3% 9
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 55.6% 11.1% 4.3 33.3% 9
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 11.1% 55.6% 22.2% 4.0 11.1% 9
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
11.1% 66.7% 11.1% 4.2 11.1% 9
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
11.1% 55.6% 11.1% 4.1 22.2% 9
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
66.7% 11.1% 22.2% 4.2 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 11.1% 66.7% 4.3 22.2% 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 44.4% 11.1% 4.2 44.4% 9
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 66.7% 22.2% 4.2 11.1% 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 11.1% 55.6% 11.1% 4.0 22.2% 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16214
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 8713: ENTREPRENEURIAL FINANCE
Response Rate: 9/18Primary Instructor: Brooks,Gary
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 9
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 11.1% 88.9% 9
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 44.4% 4.4 55.6% 9
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 44.4% 11.1% 4.3 44.4% 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 77.8% 11.1% 11.1% 4.6 9
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 44.4% 11.1% 11.1% 4.3 33.3% 9
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 44.4% 22.2% 4.0 33.3% 9
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 55.6% 11.1% 4.3 33.3% 9
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 11.1% 55.6% 22.2% 4.0 11.1% 9
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
11.1% 66.7% 11.1% 4.2 11.1% 9
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
11.1% 55.6% 11.1% 4.1 22.2% 9
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
66.7% 11.1% 22.2% 4.2 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 11.1% 66.7% 4.3 22.2% 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 44.4% 11.1% 4.2 44.4% 9
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 66.7% 22.2% 4.2 11.1% 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 11.1% 55.6% 11.1% 4.0 22.2% 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16216
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 8743: ENTREPRENEURIAL MARKETING & SALES
Response Rate: 5/8Primary Instructor: Brooks,Gary
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 5
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 5
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
100.0% 5.0 5
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17487
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 1143: Ideation & Prototyping
Response Rate: 17/18Primary Instructor: Propati,Domenick G
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 17
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 17
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 17
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 70.6% 5.9% 4.6 23.5% 17
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 64.7% 5.9% 5.9% 4.6 23.5% 17
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 88.2% 4.9 11.8% 17
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 76.5% 4.8 23.5% 17
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 58.8% 5.9% 4.5 35.3% 17
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 58.8% 11.8% 4.5 29.4% 17
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 88.2% 4.9 11.8% 17
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 94.1% 4.9 5.9% 17
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 82.4% 4.8 17.6% 17
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: G
Class Number: 21589
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 9103: SPECIAL TOPICS IN DIGITAL MEDIA
Response Rate: 14/16Primary Instructor: Propati,Domenick G
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 14
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 7.1% 92.9% 14
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 78.6% 7.1% 4.7 14.3% 14
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 57.1% 7.1% 4.4 35.7% 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 30.8% 15.4% 23.1% 15.4% 2.6 15.4% 13
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 30.8% 7.7% 53.8% 3.8 7.7% 13
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 35.7% 7.1% 7.1% 4.1 50.0% 14
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 7.1% 35.7% 7.1% 42.9% 3.6 7.1% 14
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 71.4% 7.1% 4.6 21.4% 14
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 50.0% 7.1% 7.1% 4.3 35.7% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 64.3% 4.6 35.7% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 21643
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2131: General Physics Laboratory II
Response Rate: 28/31Primary Instructor: Fried,Peter
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
96.4% 3.6% 4.9 28
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 67.9% 4.7 32.1% 28
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 28
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 28
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 28
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 28
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 3.6% 60.7% 4.5 35.7% 28
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 3.6% 46.4% 7.1% 4.3 42.9% 28
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 53.6% 3.6% 3.6% 4.5 39.3% 28
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 82.1% 4.8 17.9% 28
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.6% 50.0% 3.6% 7.1% 4.3 35.7% 28
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 10.7% 32.1% 3.6% 10.7% 3.8 42.9% 28
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A06 I have enhanced my ability to analyze and interpret data appropriately. 3.8% 46.2% 4.3 50.0% 26
A17 I have enhanced my ability to conduct experiments to validate hypotheses and
theories.
42.3% 3.8% 4.4 53.8% 26
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: ALEC
Class Number: 17679
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BMS 2004: Introduction to Physiology
Response Rate: 20/36Primary Instructor: Lee,Tommy S
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 5.0% 90.0% 5.0% 20
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.3% 94.7% 19
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 95.0% 5.0 5.0% 20
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 70.0% 15.0% 4.6 15.0% 20
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 60.0% 15.0% 15.0% 4.2 10.0% 20
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 10.0% 20.0% 5.0% 15.0% 15.0% 3.4 35.0% 20
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 5.0% 70.0% 10.0% 4.3 15.0% 20
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 10.0% 45.0% 5.0% 10.0% 4.0 30.0% 20
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 10.0% 65.0% 5.0% 4.3 20.0% 20
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 5.0% 85.0% 4.7 10.0% 20
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 5.0% 90.0% 5.0% 4.7 20
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 10.0% 65.0% 10.0% 4.2 15.0% 20
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 5.0% 60.0% 5.0% 4.4 30.0% 20
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
5.0% 65.0% 10.0% 4.4 20.0% 20
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 5.0% 70.0% 10.0% 4.5 15.0% 20
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: AREC
Class Number: 17682
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BMS 2004: Introduction to Physiology
Response Rate: 26/36Primary Instructor: Lee,Tommy S
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 11.5% 84.6% 3.8% 26
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 15.4% 84.6% 26
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 7.7% 34.6% 3.8% 30.8% 3.7 23.1% 26
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 7.7% 46.2% 15.4% 11.5% 3.8 19.2% 26
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 3.8% 34.6% 23.1% 15.4% 3.6 23.1% 26
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 3.8% 38.5% 7.7% 15.4% 11.5% 3.8 23.1% 26
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 57.7% 15.4% 7.7% 4.2 19.2% 26
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 11.5% 42.3% 3.8% 11.5% 3.9 30.8% 26
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 46.2% 3.8% 19.2% 4.2 30.8% 26
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
50.0% 3.8% 15.4% 4.3 30.8% 26
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 50.0% 3.8% 7.7% 15.4% 4.2 23.1% 26
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 73.1% 3.8% 4.7 23.1% 26
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
3.8% 46.2% 3.8% 23.1% 4.0 23.1% 26
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 15.4% 23.1% 26.9% 3.8% 3.2 30.8% 26
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 53.8% 11.5% 11.5% 4.2 23.1% 26
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: ALEC
Class Number: 17305
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BMS 3214: Microbiology
Response Rate: 9/13Primary Instructor: Lee,Tommy S
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 9
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 9
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 9
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 9
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: ALAB
Class Number: 17306
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BMS 3214: Microbiology
Response Rate: 9/13Primary Instructor: Lee,Tommy S
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
100.0% 5.0 9
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 9
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 66.7% 11.1% 4.4 22.2% 9
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 9
Q40 Value was added to my education. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: ILEC
Class Number: 17111
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BMS 3514: ORGANISMAL PHYSIOLOGY
Response Rate: 10/11Primary Instructor: Lee,Tommy S
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 50.0% 50.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 40.0% 60.0% 10
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 40.0% 20.0% 4.2 40.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 20.0% 40.0% 10.0% 20.0% 3.4 10.0% 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 20.0% 30.0% 10.0% 10.0% 3.4 30.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 80.0% 10.0% 4.6 10.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 10.0% 30.0% 20.0% 30.0% 3.3 10.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 10.0% 60.0% 10.0% 4.2 20.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 70.0% 4.7 30.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 80.0% 10.0% 4.6 10.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 10.0% 60.0% 10.0% 4.1 20.0% 10
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 50.0% 20.0% 4.3 30.0% 10
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
50.0% 20.0% 4.3 30.0% 10
A40 I have enhanced my ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
global and societal context
20.0% 10.0% 10.0% 3.9 60.0% 10
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 30.0% 30.0% 4.0 40.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 5 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: ILAB
Class Number: 17112
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BMS 3514: ORGANISMAL PHYSIOLOGY
Response Rate: 10/11Primary Instructor: Lee,Tommy S
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
20.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 3.2 20.0% 10
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 10.0% 30.0% 20.0% 3.8 40.0% 10
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 10.0% 40.0% 10.0% 4.0 40.0% 10
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 10.0% 40.0% 20.0% 3.9 30.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 22.2% 22.2% 22.2% 3.1 33.3% 9
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 10.0% 30.0% 20.0% 3.6 40.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 10.0% 40.0% 30.0% 3.5 20.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 20.0% 10.0% 50.0% 3.0 20.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 10.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 3.5 30.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 10.0% 40.0% 10.0% 30.0% 3.6 10.0% 10
Q40 Value was added to my education. 20.0% 40.0% 20.0% 3.6 20.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 30.0% 40.0% 10.0% 3.3 20.0% 10
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 50.0% 10.0% 4.4 40.0% 10
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
30.0% 10.0% 20.0% 3.9 40.0% 10
A40 I have enhanced my ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
global and societal context
10.0% 30.0% 10.0% 20.0% 3.6 30.0% 10
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 20.0% 20.0% 10.0% 3.5 50.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 6 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17123
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 3223: Dynamics
Response Rate: 10/15Primary Instructor: Flamini,Vittoria
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 90.0% 10.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 90.0% 10.0% 10
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 60.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.4 20.0% 10
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.2 20.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 10.0% 30.0% 10.0% 10.0% 20.0% 3.6 20.0% 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.3 30.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 60.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.6 20.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 60.0% 10.0% 20.0% 4.4 10.0% 10
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learned kinematics of particles using rectilinear and curvilinear coordinates and
dynamics of particles
77.8% 11.1% 4.9 11.1% 9
Q28 Learned concepts such as: Newton's laws, work, energy, impulse, momentum,
conservative force fields, and impact
55.6% 11.1% 4.6 33.3% 9
Q29 Learned modeling of systems of particles 77.8% 11.1% 4.9 11.1% 9
Q30 Learned kinematics of translation and rotation and planar motion of rigid bodies 77.8% 11.1% 11.1% 4.8 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 70.0% 10.0% 20.0% 4.6 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 70.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.6 10.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 70.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.6 10.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 70.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.6 10.0% 10
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 55.6% 11.1% 11.1% 4.5 22.2% 9
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 66.7% 11.1% 11.1% 4.6 11.1% 9
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
55.6% 11.1% 11.1% 4.5 22.2% 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16890
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 5103: BIOMEDICAL DYNAMIC FLUIDS
Response Rate: 8/8Primary Instructor: Flamini,Vittoria
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 8
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 8
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 8
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 75.0% 12.5% 4.6 12.5% 8
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 37.5% 25.0% 3.9 37.5% 8
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 87.5% 12.5% 4.8 8
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: B3LB
Class Number: 17318
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 1004: General Chemistry for Engineers
Response Rate: 15/16Primary Instructor: Pollack,Myron I.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
73.3% 6.7% 4.6 20.0% 15
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 53.3% 13.3% 13.3% 4.1 20.0% 15
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 53.3% 6.7% 4.4 40.0% 15
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 6.7% 53.3% 13.3% 6.7% 4.0 20.0% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 13.3% 40.0% 4.0 46.7% 15
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 6.7% 40.0% 6.7% 20.0% 3.9 26.7% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 6.7% 46.7% 6.7% 4.2 40.0% 15
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 6.7% 33.3% 6.7% 13.3% 4.0 40.0% 15
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 In this course we gained a basic background in general chemistry. 53.3% 6.7% 6.7% 4.3 33.3% 15
Q28 In this course we obtained a basic understanding of atomic and molecular structure
and their relationship to the properties of materials.
46.7% 6.7% 13.3% 4.2 33.3% 15
Q29 In this course we obtained hands-on laboratory experience with experimental
techniques, chemical principles and materials.
46.7% 6.7% 4.3 46.7% 15
Q30 We found the electronic homework assignments to be a useful tool in learning
chemistry.
13.3% 26.7% 6.7% 6.7% 3.8 46.7% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 46.7% 13.3% 6.7% 4.1 33.3% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 53.3% 20.0% 4.1 26.7% 15
Q40 Value was added to my education. 6.7% 46.7% 6.7% 6.7% 4.1 33.3% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 13.3% 46.7% 4.1 40.0% 15
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 13.3% 26.7% 6.7% 3.8 53.3% 15
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
6.7% 40.0% 13.3% 6.7% 3.9 33.3% 15
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 13.3% 26.7% 13.3% 3.7 46.7% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 7
13-February-2017
Section: B3RC
Class Number: 17319
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 1004: General Chemistry for Engineers
Response Rate: 15/16Primary Instructor: Pollack,Myron I.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 15
A3. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 66.7% 6.7% 4.6 26.7% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 6.7% 33.3% 6.7% 26.7% 3.7 26.7% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 40.0% 13.3% 4.1 46.7% 15
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 6.7% 46.7% 13.3% 4.0 33.3% 15
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 In this course we gained a basic background in general chemistry. 53.3% 6.7% 6.7% 4.3 33.3% 15
Q28 In this course we obtained a basic understanding of atomic and molecular structure
and their relationship to the properties of materials.
53.3% 6.7% 6.7% 4.3 33.3% 15
Q29 In this course we obtained hands-on laboratory experience with experimental
techniques, chemical principles and materials.
46.7% 13.3% 4.2 40.0% 15
Q30 We found the electronic homework assignments to be a useful tool in learning
chemistry.
6.7% 26.7% 6.7% 6.7% 4.0 53.3% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 6.7% 40.0% 6.7% 6.7% 4.0 40.0% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 6.7% 33.3% 6.7% 13.3% 3.9 40.0% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 6.7% 40.0% 6.7% 20.0% 3.9 26.7% 15
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 13.3% 26.7% 3.9 60.0% 15
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
13.3% 33.3% 6.7% 3.9 46.7% 15
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 14.3% 28.6% 7.1% 3.8 50.0% 14
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
6.7% 60.0% 13.3% 4.1 20.0% 15
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 6.7% 40.0% 6.7% 4.1 46.7% 15
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 6.7% 60.0% 6.7% 20.0% 4.1 6.7% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 7
13-February-2017
Section: BLEC
Class Number: 17320
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 1004: General Chemistry for Engineers
Response Rate: 30/48Primary Instructor: Pollack,Myron I.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 30
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 28
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 70.0% 3.3% 4.6 26.7% 30
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 6.7% 43.3% 10.0% 20.0% 3.8 20.0% 30
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 6.7% 60.0% 3.3% 4.4 30.0% 30
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 3.3% 36.7% 6.7% 3.3% 4.1 50.0% 30
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 6.7% 46.7% 10.0% 4.2 36.7% 30
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 3.3% 36.7% 3.3% 16.7% 4.0 40.0% 30
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 In this course we gained a basic background in general chemistry. 46.7% 6.7% 4.3 46.7% 30
Q28 In this course we obtained a basic understanding of atomic and molecular structure
and their relationship to the properties of materials.
43.3% 6.7% 4.3 50.0% 30
Q29 In this course we obtained hands-on laboratory experience with experimental
techniques, chemical principles and materials.
50.0% 3.3% 4.5 46.7% 30
Q30 We found the electronic homework assignments to be a useful tool in learning
chemistry.
3.3% 33.3% 3.3% 6.7% 4.1 53.3% 30
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 3.3% 30.0% 3.3% 13.3% 10.0% 3.8 40.0% 30
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 10.0% 33.3% 10.0% 10.0% 3.7 36.7% 30
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 6.7% 43.3% 3.3% 6.7% 4.1 40.0% 30
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 6.7% 36.7% 10.0% 10.0% 3.9 36.7% 30
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 6.7% 33.3% 3.3% 20.0% 3.9 36.7% 30
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
3.3% 33.3% 3.3% 23.3% 3.9 36.7% 30
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 3.3% 23.3% 6.7% 33.3% 3.7 33.3% 30
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 7
13-February-2017
Section: A1LB
Class Number: 17322
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 1024: General Chemistry II
Response Rate: 8/9Primary Instructor: Pollack,Myron I.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
100.0% 5.0 8
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 12.5% 37.5% 4.0 50.0% 8
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 62.5% 12.5% 12.5% 4.3 12.5% 8
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 12.5% 25.0% 12.5% 12.5% 3.5 37.5% 8
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 62.5% 4.6 37.5% 8
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 12.5% 50.0% 4.1 37.5% 8
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 37.5% 12.5% 4.3 50.0% 8
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 12.5% 62.5% 4.3 25.0% 8
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 62.5% 12.5% 4.5 25.0% 8
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 37.5% 12.5% 12.5% 4.0 37.5% 8
Q40 Value was added to my education. 42.9% 4.4 57.1% 7
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 37.5% 12.5% 12.5% 4.0 37.5% 8
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 7
13-February-2017
Section: A1RC
Class Number: 17323
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 1024: General Chemistry II
Response Rate: 8/9Primary Instructor: Pollack,Myron I.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 8
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 8
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 12.5% 62.5% 4.3 25.0% 8
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 12.5% 37.5% 4.0 50.0% 8
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 12.5% 62.5% 4.3 25.0% 8
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 62.5% 4.6 37.5% 8
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 37.5% 4.4 62.5% 8
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 25.0% 12.5% 12.5% 3.9 50.0% 8
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 8
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
28.6% 28.6% 4.0 42.9% 7
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 62.5% 4.6 37.5% 8
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 25.0% 25.0% 4.0 50.0% 8
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 5 of 7
13-February-2017
Section: A2LB
Class Number: 17324
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 1024: General Chemistry II
Response Rate: 7/8Primary Instructor: Pollack,Myron I.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
100.0% 5.0 7
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 71.4% 14.3% 4.4 14.3% 7
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.7% 14.3% 4.7 7
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 85.7% 14.3% 4.6 7
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 7
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 42.9% 4.4 57.1% 7
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 57.1% 14.3% 4.3 28.6% 7
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 71.4% 14.3% 4.6 14.3% 7
Q40 Value was added to my education. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 71.4% 14.3% 4.6 14.3% 7
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 6 of 7
13-February-2017
Section: A2RC
Class Number: 17325
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 1024: General Chemistry II
Response Rate: 6/9Primary Instructor: Pollack,Myron I.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 16.7% 4.2 33.3% 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 16.7% 4.2 33.3% 6
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 33.3% 4.2 16.7% 6
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 83.3% 16.7% 4.7 6
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
83.3% 16.7% 5.0 6
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 83.3% 16.7% 4.5 6
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 16.7% 66.7% 4.2 16.7% 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 7 of 7
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17128
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 3413: Automatic Control
Response Rate: 24/38Primary Instructor: Luchtenburg,Dirk Martin
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 95.8% 4.2% 24
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 23
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 95.7% 5.0 4.3% 23
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 43.5% 4.3% 17.4% 4.2 34.8% 23
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 33.3% 4.2% 4.2% 4.2 58.3% 24
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 8.3% 4.2% 4.3 37.5% 24
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 33.3% 4.2% 4.3 62.5% 24
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 20.8% 16.7% 16.7% 20.8% 3.0 25.0% 24
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learned mathematical modeling and analysis of dynamic systems (e.g., mechanical,
aerospace, electrical, robotic, thermo-fluid, and vibratory systems).
41.7% 4.4 58.3% 24
Q28 Learned basic concepts of feedback control systems and acquired the necessary
tools to design control systems using computer simulations.
62.5% 4.2% 4.5 33.3% 24
Q29 Learned and utilized specific tools to design feedback controllers for
electro-mechanical systems.
50.0% 8.3% 4.3 41.7% 24
Q30 Learned about contemporary issues in the field of automatic control. 4.2% 33.3% 8.3% 8.3% 4.0 45.8% 24
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 25.0% 29.2% 12.5% 3.5 33.3% 24
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 41.7% 4.2% 4.4 54.2% 24
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 50.0% 4.2% 8.3% 4.3 37.5% 24
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.2% 33.3% 12.5% 16.7% 3.8 33.3% 24
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
33.3% 4.2% 4.3 62.5% 24
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 45.8% 4.5 54.2% 24
A42 I have enhanced my knowledge of contemporary issues 33.3% 12.5% 20.8% 3.9 33.3% 24
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
33.3% 4.2% 4.2% 4.2 58.3% 24
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16264
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BE 6113: ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, & BIOPHYSICS II
Response Rate: 19/18Primary Instructor: Di Resta,Gene Robert
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 19
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 19
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 57.9% 10.5% 4.5 31.6% 19
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 5.3% 36.8% 15.8% 5.3% 3.8 36.8% 19
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 63.2% 5.3% 4.6 31.6% 19
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 42.1% 5.3% 10.5% 4.2 42.1% 19
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 5.3% 42.1% 21.1% 3.8 31.6% 19
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 5.3% 47.4% 15.8% 4.0 31.6% 19
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 15.8% 5.3% 5.3% 4.0 73.7% 19
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 52.6% 5.3% 10.5% 4.3 31.6% 19
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 10.5% 26.3% 15.8% 3.6 47.4% 19
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 10.5% 26.3% 10.5% 3.7 52.6% 19
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16266
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BE 6753: Orthopaedic Biomechanics and Biomaterials
Response Rate: 10/13Primary Instructor: Di Resta,Gene Robert
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 9
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 10.0% 4.7 10.0% 10
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 30.0% 20.0% 3.9 50.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 80.0% 10.0% 4.6 10.0% 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 40.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.1 30.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 20.0% 4.2 80.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 10.0% 4.4 40.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 10.0% 40.0% 10.0% 3.2 40.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 10.0% 20.0% 10.0% 30.0% 3.6 30.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 10.0% 10.0% 50.0% 3.6 30.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16273
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 8283: Risk Analysis
Response Rate: 48/28Primary Instructor: Bates,Andrew J.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 95.8% 4.2% 48
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 95.8% 4.2% 48
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 79.2% 4.2% 4.2% 4.7 12.5% 48
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 66.7% 4.2% 4.2% 4.2% 4.6 20.8% 48
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.2% 50.0% 4.2% 20.8% 4.2% 3.9 16.7% 48
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 66.7% 4.2% 4.7 29.2% 48
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 4.2% 54.2% 4.2% 8.3% 4.3 29.2% 48
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 16.7% 45.8% 4.2% 12.5% 3.7 20.8% 48
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 54.2% 4.2% 8.3% 4.2% 4.3 29.2% 48
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.2% 50.0% 4.2% 8.3% 4.2 33.3% 48
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 50.0% 4.2% 12.5% 4.2% 4.2 29.2% 48
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 8.3% 50.0% 4.2% 12.5% 4.0 25.0% 48
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 24681
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 8283: Risk Analysis
Response Rate: 9/13Primary Instructor: Bates,Andrew J.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 9
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 9
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 66.7% 11.1% 4.4 22.2% 9
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 44.4% 22.2% 4.0 33.3% 9
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 66.7% 11.1% 4.6 22.2% 9
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 11.1% 77.8% 11.1% 4.2 9
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 33.3% 22.2% 3.9 44.4% 9
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 77.8% 11.1% 4.6 11.1% 9
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
77.8% 11.1% 4.6 11.1% 9
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
77.8% 11.1% 4.6 11.1% 9
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 77.8% 11.1% 4.7 11.1% 9
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 44.4% 11.1% 4.3 44.4% 9
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 33.3% 55.6% 3.8 11.1% 9
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 33.3% 55.6% 3.8 11.1% 9
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 33.3% 55.6% 3.8 11.1% 9
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 44.4% 11.1% 4.3 44.4% 9
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 33.3% 11.1% 33.3% 3.8 22.2% 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 44.4% 11.1% 4.3 44.4% 9
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 88.9% 11.1% 4.8 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16995
Dept. of Interdisciplinary Studies
BI 7623: Systems Biology: -Omes and -Omics
Response Rate: 12/16Primary Instructor: Smyth,Davida S
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 12
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 12
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 25.0% 8.3% 41.7% 3.8 25.0% 12
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 12
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 58.3% 16.7% 4.4 25.0% 12
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 75.0% 8.3% 4.7 16.7% 12
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
25.0% 16.7% 41.7% 3.5 16.7% 12
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 58.3% 25.0% 4.3 16.7% 12
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
33.3% 25.0% 4.1 41.7% 12
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 8.3% 33.3% 3.8 58.3% 12
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 33.3% 25.0% 4.1 41.7% 12
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 8.3% 8.3% 66.7% 3.4 16.7% 12
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 8.3% 8.3% 66.7% 3.4 16.7% 12
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 8.3% 8.3% 75.0% 3.3 8.3% 12
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 8.3% 25.0% 16.7% 33.3% 3.6 16.7% 12
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 8.3% 25.0% 16.7% 33.3% 3.6 16.7% 12
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 8.3% 8.3% 4.1 50.0% 12
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 8.3% 50.0% 16.7% 4.1 25.0% 12
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 75.0% 8.3% 8.3% 8.3% 4.5 12
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 8.3% 50.0% 8.3% 8.3% 4.0 25.0% 12
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16750
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6411: Fixed Income Securities and Interest Rate Derivatives
Response Rate: 9/10Primary Instructor: Alizadeh,Sassan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 55.6% 22.2% 22.2% 9
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 8
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 9
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 22.2% 44.4% 11.1% 3.7 22.2% 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 11.1% 33.3% 22.2% 3.2 33.3% 9
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 22.2% 11.1% 22.2% 44.4% 3.3 9
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 44.4% 11.1% 22.2% 4.3 22.2% 9
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 55.6% 11.1% 4.3 33.3% 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 11.1% 4.2 55.6% 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16854
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 6063: Creative Coding
Response Rate: 16/20Primary Instructor: Siwoff,Kevin Jacob
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 93.8% 6.3% 16
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 93.8% 6.3% 16
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 16
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 93.8% 6.3% 4.8 16
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 6.3% 68.8% 4.5 25.0% 16
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 75.0% 6.3% 18.8% 4.6 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 93.8% 6.3% 4.8 16
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 93.8% 6.3% 4.9 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 81.3% 4.8 18.8% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 16
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 93.8% 6.3% 4.8 16
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 22446
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 7353: Network Modeling and Analysis
Response Rate: 18/20Primary Instructor: Panwar,Shivendra
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 11.1% 88.9% 18
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 18
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 61.1% 5.6% 4.5 33.3% 18
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 41.2% 11.8% 17.6% 4.0 29.4% 17
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 5.6% 44.4% 4.3 50.0% 18
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 5.6% 38.9% 11.1% 4.1 44.4% 18
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 55.6% 11.1% 5.6% 4.3 27.8% 18
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 33.3% 16.7% 4.2 50.0% 18
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 5.6% 33.3% 16.7% 5.6% 3.8 38.9% 18
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 5.6% 50.0% 4.3 44.4% 18
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 55.6% 27.8% 4.3 16.7% 18
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 44.4% 5.6% 16.7% 4.2 33.3% 18
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16788
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BE 6403: Digital Signal Processing I
Response Rate: 46/91Primary Instructor: Voltz,Peter J.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 2.2% 95.7% 2.2% 46
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 2.2% 93.5% 4.3% 46
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 89.1% 2.2% 4.9 8.7% 46
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 76.1% 2.2% 2.2% 6.5% 4.7 13.0% 46
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 65.2% 4.3% 4.3% 10.9% 4.5 15.2% 46
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 76.1% 4.3% 2.2% 4.3% 4.7 13.0% 46
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 71.7% 2.2% 4.3% 2.2% 4.6 19.6% 46
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 2.2% 63.0% 2.2% 6.5% 8.7% 4.4 17.4% 46
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 54.3% 2.2% 6.5% 4.4 37.0% 46
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 65.2% 2.2% 2.2% 6.5% 4.6 23.9% 46
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 76.1% 2.2% 2.2% 4.7 19.6% 46
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 67.4% 2.2% 4.3% 8.7% 4.5 17.4% 46
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16791
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 6113: Digital Signal Processing I
Response Rate: 46/91Primary Instructor: Voltz,Peter J.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 2.2% 95.7% 2.2% 46
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 2.2% 93.5% 4.3% 46
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 89.1% 2.2% 4.9 8.7% 46
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 76.1% 2.2% 2.2% 6.5% 4.7 13.0% 46
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 65.2% 4.3% 4.3% 10.9% 4.5 15.2% 46
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 76.1% 4.3% 2.2% 4.3% 4.7 13.0% 46
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 71.7% 2.2% 4.3% 2.2% 4.6 19.6% 46
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 2.2% 63.0% 2.2% 6.5% 8.7% 4.4 17.4% 46
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 54.3% 2.2% 6.5% 4.4 37.0% 46
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 65.2% 2.2% 2.2% 6.5% 4.6 23.9% 46
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 76.1% 2.2% 2.2% 4.7 19.6% 46
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 67.4% 2.2% 4.3% 8.7% 4.5 17.4% 46
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16792
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 6113: Digital Signal Processing I
Response Rate: 10/14Primary Instructor: Voltz,Peter J.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 20.0% 80.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 10.0% 90.0% 10
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 60.0% 30.0% 4.3 10.0% 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 70.0% 10.0% 4.8 20.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 70.0% 10.0% 4.5 20.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 40.0% 30.0% 10.0% 3.7 20.0% 10
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 10
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 20.0% 10.0% 10.0% 30.0% 3.7 30.0% 10
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
30.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.2 50.0% 10
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 20.0% 10.0% 20.0% 4.0 50.0% 10
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
40.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.2 40.0% 10
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 30.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.2 50.0% 10
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 40.0% 10.0% 20.0% 10.0% 3.9 20.0% 10
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 10.0% 70.0% 3.2 20.0% 10
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 20.0% 10.0% 60.0% 3.6 10.0% 10
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 10.0% 70.0% 3.4 20.0% 10
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 20.0% 3.6 50.0% 10
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 60.0% 3.2 10.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 30.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.2 50.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 40.0% 10.0% 4.4 50.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 70.0% 10.0% 4.8 20.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 40.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.3 40.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 24429
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 8353: CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULING
Response Rate: 48/30Primary Instructor: Ergan,Semiha
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 48
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 48
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 55.3% 4.3% 4.5 40.4% 47
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 45.8% 4.2% 4.2% 4.3 45.8% 48
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 48
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 60.9% 8.7% 4.3% 4.4 26.1% 46
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 66.7% 4.2% 4.2% 4.5 25.0% 48
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 12.5% 50.0% 4.1 37.5% 48
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 37.5% 16.7% 12.5% 3.9 33.3% 48
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 70.8% 4.2% 4.7 25.0% 48
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 54.2% 4.2% 8.3% 4.4 33.3% 48
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 75.0% 4.2% 4.7 20.8% 48
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17611
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 3824: Electric Energy Conversion Systems
Response Rate: 15/30Primary Instructor: Czarkowski,Dariusz
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 93.3% 6.7% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 15
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 86.7% 6.7% 4.7 6.7% 15
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 33.3% 13.3% 20.0% 4.2 33.3% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 6.7% 6.7% 6.7% 6.7% 33.3% 3.4 40.0% 15
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 40.0% 6.7% 6.7% 20.0% 4.1 26.7% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 6.7% 33.3% 20.0% 13.3% 3.6 26.7% 15
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 53.3% 6.7% 6.7% 4.3 33.3% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 26.7% 13.3% 13.3% 3.9 46.7% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 40.0% 13.3% 6.7% 4.1 40.0% 15
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 33.3% 13.3% 6.7% 4.0 46.7% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 33.3% 6.7% 6.7% 4.1 53.3% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16653
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 6673: RESONANT POWER CONVERTERS
Response Rate: 13/16Primary Instructor: Czarkowski,Dariusz
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 13
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 92.3% 7.7% 13
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 7.7% 69.2% 4.5 23.1% 13
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 7.7% 69.2% 7.7% 4.4 15.4% 13
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 7.7% 61.5% 7.7% 4.3 23.1% 13
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 7.7% 69.2% 4.5 23.1% 13
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 7.7% 61.5% 4.4 30.8% 13
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 7.7% 76.9% 4.5 15.4% 13
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 7.7% 61.5% 4.4 30.8% 13
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 7.7% 53.8% 4.3 38.5% 13
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
7.7% 69.2% 7.7% 4.4 15.4% 13
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 7.7% 61.5% 4.4 30.8% 13
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
7.7% 69.2% 4.5 23.1% 13
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 7.7% 69.2% 4.5 23.1% 13
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 7.7% 69.2% 4.5 23.1% 13
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 7.7% 46.2% 7.7% 15.4% 3.9 23.1% 13
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 38.5% 15.4% 7.7% 4.0 38.5% 13
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 46.2% 7.7% 23.1% 4.1 23.1% 13
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 15.4% 69.2% 7.7% 4.2 7.7% 13
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 23.1% 46.2% 15.4% 3.6 15.4% 13
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 7.7% 69.2% 4.5 23.1% 13
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 7.7% 69.2% 4.5 23.1% 13
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 7.7% 84.6% 4.6 7.7% 13
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 7.7% 84.6% 4.6 7.7% 13
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16972
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 9053: SPECIAL TOPICS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE
Response Rate: 64/70Primary Instructor: Langel,Brian
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 98.4% 1.6% 64
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 6.3% 90.6% 3.1% 64
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.9% 1.6% 4.9 12.5% 64
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 87.5% 1.6% 3.1% 4.9 7.8% 64
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 78.1% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 4.7 17.2% 64
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 7.8% 54.7% 1.6% 14.1% 3.1% 4.0 18.8% 64
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 79.7% 1.6% 4.8 18.8% 64
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 78.1% 1.6% 3.1% 3.1% 4.7 14.1% 64
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 1.6% 17.2% 4.7% 4.1 26.6% 64
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 76.6% 1.6% 1.6% 4.7 20.3% 64
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 82.8% 1.6% 1.6% 3.1% 4.8 10.9% 64
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 73.4% 1.6% 1.6% 6.3% 4.7 17.2% 64
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: J5
Class Number: 16996
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 7801: TOPICS IN FINANCE AND FINANCIAL MARKETS I
Response Rate: 11/13Primary Instructor: Malhotra,Naresh
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 18.2% 81.8% 11
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 11
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 81.8% 18.2% 4.6 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 45.5% 9.1% 45.5% 4.0 11
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 54.5% 9.1% 27.3% 4.3 9.1% 11
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 72.7% 4.7 27.3% 11
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 72.7% 4.7 27.3% 11
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 23260
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 7821: TOPICS IN RISK FINANCE I
Response Rate: 6/9Primary Instructor: Malhotra,Naresh
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 6
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 6
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 6
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 6
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 22256
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
EN 3154W: Fantasy Workshop
Response Rate: 15/15Primary Instructor: Schreiber,Samuel G
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 14
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 73.3% 6.7% 4.6 20.0% 15
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 6.7% 46.7% 13.3% 13.3% 3.9 20.0% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 20.0% 20.0% 26.7% 2.7 33.3% 15
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 6.7% 46.7% 6.7% 13.3% 4.0 26.7% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 60.0% 13.3% 6.7% 4.3 20.0% 15
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 53.3% 33.3% 4.2 13.3% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 6.7% 53.3% 6.7% 4.2 33.3% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 6.7% 46.7% 6.7% 4.2 40.0% 15
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 6.7% 53.3% 6.7% 6.7% 4.1 26.7% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 46.7% 13.3% 6.7% 4.1 33.3% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17113
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
AE 4613: Aerodynamics
Response Rate: 18/26Primary Instructor: Sahin,Iskender
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 18
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.6% 94.4% 18
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 88.9% 5.6% 4.8 5.6% 18
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 66.7% 5.6% 4.6 27.8% 18
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 18
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 66.7% 5.6% 5.6% 4.5 22.2% 18
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 61.1% 5.6% 5.6% 4.4 27.8% 18
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 18
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learned the fundamentals of potential flow theory 76.5% 4.8 23.5% 17
Q28 Know the characteristic parameters for airfoil and wing aerodynamics 76.5% 4.8 23.5% 17
Q29 Learned the fundamental of incompressible and compressible flow over wings, for
both laminar and turbulent boundary layers
70.6% 4.7 29.4% 17
Q30 Learned how to design an airfoil to meet certain specification. 6.3% 43.8% 12.5% 4.1 37.5% 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 5.6% 55.6% 11.1% 4.3 27.8% 18
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 18
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 77.8% 11.1% 4.7 11.1% 18
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 72.2% 5.6% 5.6% 4.6 16.7% 18
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
58.8% 5.9% 4.5 35.3% 17
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 64.7% 5.9% 4.5 29.4% 17
A48 I have enhanced my ability to apply principles of engineering, basic science, and
mathematics (including multivariate calculus and differential equations) to model,
analyze, design, and realize physical systems, components or processes
58.8% 5.9% 4.5 35.3% 17
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16306
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 5223: Sensor Based Robotics
Response Rate: 33/44Primary Instructor: Khorrami,Farshad
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 33
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 3.1% 93.8% 3.1% 32
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 87.9% 4.9 12.1% 33
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 3.1% 43.8% 15.6% 9.4% 3.9 28.1% 32
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 6.1% 33.3% 27.3% 3.0% 3.6 30.3% 33
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 48.5% 3.0% 9.1% 4.3 39.4% 33
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 51.5% 9.1% 9.1% 4.2 30.3% 33
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 42.4% 12.1% 9.1% 4.1 36.4% 33
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 39.4% 15.2% 12.1% 4.0 33.3% 33
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 63.6% 3.0% 4.6 33.3% 33
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 3.0% 48.5% 9.1% 3.0% 4.2 36.4% 33
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 3.0% 48.5% 6.1% 18.2% 4.1 24.2% 33
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 23877
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 6253: Linear Systems
Response Rate: 4/6Primary Instructor: Khorrami,Farshad
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 25.0% 75.0% 4
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 4
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 2.0 4
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 4.0 100.0% 4
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 3.5 25.0% 4
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
33.3% 33.3% 3.7 33.3% 3
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 25.0% 25.0% 4.0 50.0% 4
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
25.0% 4.3 75.0% 4
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 25.0% 4.3 75.0% 4
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 25.0% 25.0% 3.8 50.0% 4
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 25.0% 25.0% 3.3 50.0% 4
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 25.0% 50.0% 3.0 25.0% 4
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 3.5 25.0% 4
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 50.0% 25.0% 4.3 25.0% 4
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 4
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 25.0% 3.3 75.0% 4
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 25.0% 4.3 25.0% 4
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 75.0% 25.0% 4.5 4
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 75.0% 25.0% 4.5 4
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16320
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 7253: State Space Design for Linear Control Systems
Response Rate: 12/15Primary Instructor: Khorrami,Farshad
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 8.3% 91.7% 12
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 12
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 12
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 91.7% 4.9 8.3% 12
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 16.7% 4.3 33.3% 12
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 12
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 12
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 58.3% 16.7% 8.3% 4.2 16.7% 12
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 8.3% 58.3% 16.7% 4.0 16.7% 12
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 83.3% 16.7% 4.7 12
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 23995
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 6913: Introduction to Robot Mechanics
Response Rate: 33/44Primary Instructor: Khorrami,Farshad
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 33
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 3.1% 93.8% 3.1% 32
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 87.9% 4.9 12.1% 33
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 3.1% 43.8% 15.6% 9.4% 3.9 28.1% 32
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 6.1% 33.3% 27.3% 3.0% 3.6 30.3% 33
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 48.5% 3.0% 9.1% 4.3 39.4% 33
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 51.5% 9.1% 9.1% 4.2 30.3% 33
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 42.4% 12.1% 9.1% 4.1 36.4% 33
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 39.4% 15.2% 12.1% 4.0 33.3% 33
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 63.6% 3.0% 4.6 33.3% 33
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 3.0% 48.5% 9.1% 3.0% 4.2 36.4% 33
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 3.0% 48.5% 6.1% 18.2% 4.1 24.2% 33
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 23233
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 7373: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY & MICROBIOLOGY
Response Rate: 16/20Primary Instructor: Om,Joon
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 12.5% 87.5% 16
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 6.3% 93.8% 16
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 31.3% 6.3% 4.3 62.5% 16
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 12.5% 37.5% 12.5% 18.8% 3.6 18.8% 16
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 6.3% 43.8% 6.3% 6.3% 4.1 37.5% 16
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 18.8% 43.8% 3.9 37.5% 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 12.5% 31.3% 6.3% 12.5% 3.7 37.5% 16
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 12.5% 25.0% 12.5% 3.6 50.0% 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 25.0% 18.8% 25.0% 3.6 31.3% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 31.3% 18.8% 12.5% 3.8 37.5% 16
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 18.8% 43.8% 18.8% 18.8% 3.3 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 18.8% 43.8% 12.5% 12.5% 3.5 12.5% 16
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: INT4
Class Number: 24059
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6823: Network Security
Response Rate: 38/50Primary Instructor: O'Brien,Keith
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 2.6% 97.4% 38
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 38
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 94.6% 2.7% 4.9 2.7% 37
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 94.7% 4.9 5.3% 38
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 2.6% 76.3% 5.3% 2.6% 4.6 13.2% 38
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 63.2% 2.6% 7.9% 2.6% 4.5 23.7% 38
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 84.2% 5.3% 4.8 10.5% 38
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 76.3% 2.6% 2.6% 4.8 18.4% 38
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 94.7% 4.9 5.3% 38
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 73.7% 10.5% 4.6 15.8% 38
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
92.1% 4.9 7.9% 38
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 81.6% 2.6% 5.3% 4.7 10.5% 38
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
84.2% 2.6% 5.3% 4.7 7.9% 38
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 76.3% 2.6% 2.6% 4.7 18.4% 38
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 78.9% 2.6% 2.6% 4.7 15.8% 38
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 65.8% 23.7% 4.4 10.5% 38
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 68.4% 23.7% 4.4 7.9% 38
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 63.2% 21.1% 4.4 15.8% 38
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 65.8% 2.6% 10.5% 4.5 21.1% 38
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 60.5% 2.6% 15.8% 4.4 21.1% 38
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 65.8% 5.3% 4.6 28.9% 38
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 81.6% 4.8 18.4% 38
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 38
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 92.1% 4.9 7.9% 38
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17596
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 4783: Applied Cryptography
Response Rate: 16/40Primary Instructor: Di Crescenzo,Giovanni
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 16
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 16
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 62.5% 6.3% 4.6 31.3% 16
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 56.3% 12.5% 6.3% 4.3 25.0% 16
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 37.5% 12.5% 4.3 50.0% 16
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 25.0% 4.0 25.0% 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 6.3% 37.5% 6.3% 4.1 50.0% 16
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 6.3% 43.8% 18.8% 12.5% 3.8 18.8% 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 18.8% 43.8% 6.3% 18.8% 3.6 12.5% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 43.8% 12.5% 18.8% 4.0 25.0% 16
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 12.5% 31.3% 25.0% 6.3% 3.4 25.0% 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 6.3% 43.8% 25.0% 12.5% 3.6 12.5% 16
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16246
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6903: Applied Cryptography
Response Rate: 16/40Primary Instructor: Di Crescenzo,Giovanni
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 16
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 16
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 62.5% 6.3% 4.6 31.3% 16
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 56.3% 12.5% 6.3% 4.3 25.0% 16
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 37.5% 12.5% 4.3 50.0% 16
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 25.0% 4.0 25.0% 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 6.3% 37.5% 6.3% 4.1 50.0% 16
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 6.3% 43.8% 18.8% 12.5% 3.8 18.8% 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 18.8% 43.8% 6.3% 18.8% 3.6 12.5% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 43.8% 12.5% 18.8% 4.0 25.0% 16
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 12.5% 31.3% 25.0% 6.3% 3.4 25.0% 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 6.3% 43.8% 25.0% 12.5% 3.6 12.5% 16
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16539
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6903: Applied Cryptography
Response Rate: 4/9Primary Instructor: Di Crescenzo,Giovanni
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 4
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 4
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 25.0% 50.0% 3.3 25.0% 4
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 25.0% 25.0% 3.5 50.0% 4
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 25.0% 25.0% 3.5 50.0% 4
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 25.0% 4.3 25.0% 4
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 25.0% 2.8 25.0% 4
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 25.0% 25.0% 2.5 4
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 50.0% 25.0% 25.0% 2.5 4
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 50.0% 25.0% 25.0% 2.5 4
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 3.0 25.0% 4
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 2.8 4
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 25.0% 25.0% 3.0 50.0% 4
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 75.0% 3.3 25.0% 4
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 25.0% 75.0% 3.5 4
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 75.0% 3.3 25.0% 4
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 25.0% 25.0% 3.8 50.0% 4
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 25.0% 50.0% 3.0 25.0% 4
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 25.0% 2.3 25.0% 4
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 2.5 50.0% 4
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 50.0% 25.0% 2.3 25.0% 4
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 25.0% 25.0% 2.5 4
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 21553
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
IE 7993: SUPPLY CHAIN ENGINEERING
Response Rate: 19/30Primary Instructor: Walker,William T
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 19
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 19
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 78.9% 5.3% 4.7 15.8% 19
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 68.4% 5.3% 4.6 26.3% 19
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 94.7% 4.9 5.3% 19
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 73.7% 5.3% 5.3% 4.6 15.8% 19
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 5.3% 63.2% 4.5 31.6% 19
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 10.5% 57.9% 10.5% 5.3% 4.0 15.8% 19
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 63.2% 10.5% 5.3% 4.4 21.1% 19
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
52.6% 10.5% 4.4 36.8% 19
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
68.4% 5.3% 5.3% 4.5 21.1% 19
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
52.6% 15.8% 4.4 31.6% 19
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 47.4% 5.3% 15.8% 4.2 31.6% 19
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 78.9% 5.3% 5.3% 4.6 10.5% 19
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 5.3% 63.2% 5.3% 4.4 26.3% 19
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 73.7% 5.3% 4.6 21.1% 19
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16794
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 6303: Probability and Stochastic Processes
Response Rate: 21/25Primary Instructor: Chen,Xiao-Kang
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 20
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.0% 95.0% 20
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 25.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 3.9 45.0% 20
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 10.0% 4.4 40.0% 20
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.8% 42.9% 28.6% 4.0 23.8% 21
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 47.6% 9.5% 4.4 42.9% 21
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 38.1% 14.3% 9.5% 4.0 38.1% 21
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 10.0% 5.0% 4.3 35.0% 20
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 23.8% 14.3% 19.0% 3.8 42.9% 21
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 4.8% 14.3% 4.8% 4.8% 42.9% 3.5 28.6% 21
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
66.7% 14.3% 4.5 19.0% 21
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 28.6% 14.3% 14.3% 3.9 42.9% 21
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
52.4% 4.8% 14.3% 4.3 28.6% 21
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 61.9% 4.8% 4.6 33.3% 21
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 47.6% 9.5% 4.8% 4.2 38.1% 21
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 23.8% 9.5% 9.5% 47.6% 3.5 9.5% 21
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 23.8% 9.5% 9.5% 47.6% 3.5 9.5% 21
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 4.8% 19.0% 9.5% 52.4% 3.5 14.3% 21
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 4.8% 52.4% 23.8% 4.1 19.0% 21
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 4.8% 33.3% 4.8% 9.5% 33.3% 3.7 14.3% 21
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.8% 38.1% 19.0% 19.0% 3.7 19.0% 21
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.8% 61.9% 4.8% 4.4 28.6% 21
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 38.1% 4.8% 14.3% 4.1 42.9% 21
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 9.5% 52.4% 9.5% 4.8% 4.0 23.8% 21
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16208
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 7503: Electronic Business Management
Response Rate: 23/27Primary Instructor: Driscoll,Michael W
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 23
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 23
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 87.0% 4.3% 4.8 8.7% 23
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 87.0% 4.3% 4.8 8.7% 23
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 73.9% 8.7% 4.7 17.4% 23
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 73.9% 17.4% 4.6 8.7% 23
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 69.6% 4.3% 8.7% 4.5 17.4% 23
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 73.9% 4.3% 4.3% 4.7 17.4% 23
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 73.9% 4.3% 4.7 21.7% 23
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
73.9% 4.3% 4.7 21.7% 23
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
82.6% 8.7% 4.7 8.7% 23
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
78.3% 4.3% 4.7 17.4% 23
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 60.9% 4.3% 4.6 34.8% 23
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 69.6% 4.3% 4.7 26.1% 23
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 78.3% 8.7% 4.7 13.0% 23
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 78.3% 4.3% 4.7 17.4% 23
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: MOT2
Class Number: 24484
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 7953: Global Innovation
Response Rate: 20/32Primary Instructor: Driscoll,Michael W
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 10.0% 90.0% 20
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 20
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 94.7% 4.9 5.3% 19
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 19
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 70.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 4.6 15.0% 20
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 68.4% 5.3% 10.5% 4.6 15.8% 19
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 20
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 85.0% 5.0% 4.8 10.0% 20
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 85.0% 5.0% 4.8 10.0% 20
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
80.0% 5.0% 4.7 15.0% 20
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
5.0% 80.0% 4.7 15.0% 20
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
80.0% 4.8 20.0% 20
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 65.0% 15.0% 4.5 20.0% 20
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 70.0% 5.0% 10.0% 4.5 15.0% 20
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 20
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 75.0% 10.0% 4.6 15.0% 20
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: MOT
Class Number: 16692
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 8783: CLOUD COMPUTING: PRINCIPLES, ECONOMICS, TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICE
Response Rate: 22/22Primary Instructor: Driscoll,Michael W
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 22
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 4.5% 95.5% 22
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 86.4% 4.5% 4.8 9.1% 22
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 95.5% 5.0 4.5% 22
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 90.9% 4.5% 4.9 4.5% 22
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 90.9% 4.9 9.1% 22
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 77.3% 4.8 22.7% 22
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 81.8% 4.5% 4.9 13.6% 22
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 86.4% 4.9 13.6% 22
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
77.3% 4.5% 4.7 18.2% 22
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
90.9% 4.5% 4.8 4.5% 22
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
81.8% 4.8 18.2% 22
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 81.8% 9.1% 4.7 9.1% 22
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 90.9% 4.9 9.1% 22
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 95.5% 5.0 4.5% 22
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 86.4% 4.5% 4.8 9.1% 22
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Class Number: 2023B-Ostrovsky,Vladimir
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2023: ELECTRICITY, MAGNETISM, & FLUIDS
Response Rate: 71/87Primary Instructor: Ostrovsky,Vladimir
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 12.7% 81.7% 5.6% 71
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 13.0% 85.5% 1.4% 69
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 8.5% 43.7% 2.8% 2.8% 11.3% 4.0 31.0% 71
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 11.3% 22.5% 2.8% 11.3% 29.6% 3.3 22.5% 71
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.2% 42.3% 1.4% 4.2% 23.9% 4.0 23.9% 71
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 12.7% 32.4% 12.7% 14.1% 3.5 28.2% 71
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 18.3% 22.5% 16.9% 7.0% 3.3 35.2% 71
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 7.0% 38.0% 7.0% 18.3% 3.8 29.6% 71
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 12.7% 23.9% 15.5% 12.7% 3.4 35.2% 71
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 9.9% 19.7% 14.1% 21.1% 3.4 35.2% 71
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 25.4% 19.7% 1.4% 19.7% 15.5% 2.9 18.3% 71
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 16.9% 14.1% 11.3% 23.9% 3.2 33.8% 71
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Class Number: 2033C-Ostrovsky,Vladimir
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2033: WAVES, OPTICS, & THERMODYNAMICS
Response Rate: 62/85Primary Instructor: Ostrovsky,Vladimir
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 8.2% 88.5% 3.3% 61
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.1% 93.2% 1.7% 59
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 1.6% 30.6% 9.7% 8.1% 9.7% 4.0 40.3% 62
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 4.8% 22.6% 9.7% 8.1% 29.0% 3.6 25.8% 62
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.8% 37.1% 8.1% 4.8% 19.4% 3.9 25.8% 62
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 4.8% 45.2% 4.8% 4.8% 14.5% 4.1 25.8% 62
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 8.2% 29.5% 8.2% 13.1% 3.8 41.0% 61
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 3.3% 39.3% 9.8% 14.8% 4.0 32.8% 61
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 1.6% 32.3% 3.2% 1.6% 16.1% 4.1 45.2% 62
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 6.5% 33.9% 6.5% 14.5% 3.9 38.7% 62
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 16.1% 22.6% 8.1% 19.4% 16.1% 3.1 17.7% 62
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 11.3% 22.6% 3.2% 3.2% 21.0% 3.6 38.7% 62
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17342
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 4124: Thermodynamics and Statistical Physics
Response Rate: 5/14Primary Instructor: Ostrovsky,Vladimir
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 5
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 5
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.6 40.0% 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 40.0% 40.0% 2.8 20.0% 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 40.0% 3.2 60.0% 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 4.0 40.0% 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 20.0% 40.0% 2.6 40.0% 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 40.0% 20.0% 20.0% 2.2 20.0% 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 20.0% 20.0% 3.2 60.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 21577
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 8653: MANAGING TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE & INNOVATION
Response Rate: 12/13Primary Instructor: Rao,Bharadwaj
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 12
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 91.7% 8.3% 12
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 33.3% 8.3% 4.3 58.3% 12
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 58.3% 16.7% 4.4 25.0% 12
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 75.0% 8.3% 4.7 16.7% 12
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 58.3% 4.6 41.7% 12
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 8.3% 4.3 41.7% 12
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 41.7% 16.7% 4.3 41.7% 12
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 41.7% 8.3% 16.7% 4.1 33.3% 12
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
58.3% 4.6 41.7% 12
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
50.0% 8.3% 8.3% 4.3 33.3% 12
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
50.0% 8.3% 4.4 41.7% 12
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 58.3% 4.6 41.7% 12
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 8.3% 50.0% 8.3% 4.2 33.3% 12
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
50.0% 4.5 50.0% 12
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 8.3% 50.0% 4.3 41.7% 12
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
66.7% 8.3% 4.5 25.0% 12
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 66.7% 8.3% 4.6 25.0% 12
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 66.7% 8.3% 4.5 25.0% 12
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 58.3% 33.3% 4.3 8.3% 12
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 66.7% 16.7% 4.5 16.7% 12
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 58.3% 25.0% 4.3 16.7% 12
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 16.7% 33.3% 8.3% 8.3% 16.7% 3.5 16.7% 12
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 16.7% 41.7% 8.3% 8.3% 3.7 25.0% 12
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 16.7% 4.2 83.3% 12
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 21577
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 8653: MANAGING TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE & INNOVATION
Response Rate: 12/13Primary Instructor: Rao,Bharadwaj
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 16.7% 8.3% 4.1 25.0% 12
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 41.7% 8.3% 8.3% 4.2 41.7% 12
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 8.3% 41.7% 8.3% 8.3% 3.9 33.3% 12
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 23880
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 9503: MOT Capstone Project Course
Response Rate: 2/5Primary Instructor: Rao,Bharadwaj
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 2
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 50.0% 50.0% 2
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 50.0% 3.5 50.0% 2
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 50.0% 3.5 2
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 3.0 2
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
50.0% 50.0% 5.0 2
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 50.0% 3.5 50.0% 2
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 50.0% 3.0 50.0% 2
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 50.0% 3.5 50.0% 2
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 50.0% 3.5 50.0% 2
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 50.0% 50.0% 5.0 2
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 100.0% 5.0 2
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 100.0% 5.0 2
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 50.0% 50.0% 3.0 2
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 50.0% 50.0% 3.0 2
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 2
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 23880
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 9503: MOT Capstone Project Course
Response Rate: 2/5Primary Instructor: Rao,Bharadwaj
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 2
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: LCLB
Class Number: 17200
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 4543: CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROJECT
Response Rate: 23/25Primary Instructor: Fickeria,Dominick Joseph
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 23
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 8.7% 91.3% 23
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 87.0% 4.3% 4.8 8.7% 23
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 52.2% 13.0% 4.3 34.8% 23
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 60.9% 8.7% 4.5 30.4% 23
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 39.1% 8.7% 4.3% 4.2 47.8% 23
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 68.2% 9.1% 4.5 22.7% 22
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.3% 52.2% 8.7% 8.7% 4.1 26.1% 23
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have demonstrated proficiency in the basic construction management skills,
including planning, estimating, scheduling and building information modeling.
85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
Q28 I was responsible for deliverables as part of a team. 100.0% 5.0 7
Q29 I understand the application of construction management principles and practices. 100.0% 5.0 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 60.9% 17.4% 4.3 21.7% 23
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 73.9% 4.3% 4.7 21.7% 23
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 65.2% 8.7% 4.5 26.1% 23
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.3% 65.2% 4.3% 13.0% 4.3 13.0% 23
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
50.0% 4.5% 4.4 45.5% 22
A36 I have learned how to function on multi-disciplinary teams 59.1% 4.6 40.9% 22
A38 I have enhanced my ability to develop an understanding of professional and ethical
responsibility
63.6% 9.1% 4.5 27.3% 22
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 63.6% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5 27.3% 22
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LCLB
Class Number: 17588
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 4812: Civil Engineering Design I: Site Planning and Design
Response Rate: 23/25Primary Instructor: Fickeria,Dominick Joseph
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 23
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 8.7% 91.3% 23
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 87.0% 4.3% 4.8 8.7% 23
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 52.2% 13.0% 4.3 34.8% 23
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 60.9% 8.7% 4.5 30.4% 23
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 39.1% 8.7% 4.3% 4.2 47.8% 23
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 68.2% 9.1% 4.5 22.7% 22
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.3% 52.2% 8.7% 8.7% 4.1 26.1% 23
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have demonstrated proficiency in the basic construction management skills,
including planning, estimating, scheduling and building information modeling.
85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
Q28 I was responsible for deliverables as part of a team. 100.0% 5.0 7
Q29 I understand the application of construction management principles and practices. 100.0% 5.0 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 60.9% 17.4% 4.3 21.7% 23
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 73.9% 4.3% 4.7 21.7% 23
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 65.2% 8.7% 4.5 26.1% 23
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.3% 65.2% 4.3% 13.0% 4.3 13.0% 23
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
50.0% 4.5% 4.4 45.5% 22
A36 I have learned how to function on multi-disciplinary teams 59.1% 4.6 40.9% 22
A38 I have enhanced my ability to develop an understanding of professional and ethical
responsibility
63.6% 9.1% 4.5 27.3% 22
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 63.6% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5 27.3% 22
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LCLB
Class Number: 17590
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 4822: Civil Engineering Design II: Structural Design
Response Rate: 38/40Primary Instructor: Fickeria,Dominick Joseph
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 97.4% 2.6% 38
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 10.5% 89.5% 38
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 5.3% 65.8% 2.6% 13.2% 4.3 13.2% 38
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 10.5% 13.2% 13.2% 23.7% 3.3 39.5% 38
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 13.2% 18.4% 13.2% 39.5% 3.1 15.8% 38
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 7.9% 13.2% 23.7% 39.5% 3.0 15.8% 38
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 15.8% 18.4% 39.5% 18.4% 2.7 7.9% 38
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 5.3% 10.5% 18.4% 42.1% 3.2 23.7% 38
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 5.3% 26.3% 10.5% 28.9% 3.6 28.9% 38
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 10.5% 23.7% 15.8% 21.1% 3.4 28.9% 38
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 13.2% 10.5% 15.8% 26.3% 3.1 34.2% 38
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 21.1% 15.8% 18.4% 18.4% 3.0 26.3% 38
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
11.1% 19.4% 2.8% 22.2% 3.6 44.4% 36
A36 I have learned how to function on multi-disciplinary teams 8.3% 27.8% 19.4% 3.8 44.4% 36
A38 I have enhanced my ability to develop an understanding of professional and ethical
responsibility
8.3% 22.2% 5.6% 27.8% 3.6 36.1% 36
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 11.1% 22.2% 2.8% 22.2% 3.6 41.7% 36
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17190
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 2523: CONTRACTS & CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
Response Rate: 30/36Primary Instructor: Chiarelli,Lawrence
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 96.7% 3.3% 30
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 13.8% 82.8% 3.4% 29
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 86.7% 3.3% 4.8 10.0% 30
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 3.3% 13.3% 4.3 33.3% 30
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 3.3% 33.3% 13.3% 6.7% 3.9 43.3% 30
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 6.7% 16.7% 3.3% 20.0% 13.3% 3.4 40.0% 30
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 30.0% 16.7% 23.3% 3.7 30.0% 30
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 3.3% 6.7% 10.0% 3.3% 60.0% 3.2 16.7% 30
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I understand the functions and contents of construction documents 40.0% 3.3% 4.3 56.7% 30
Q28 I understand the various project delivery systems and document requirements for
each
40.0% 6.7% 10.0% 4.2 43.3% 30
Q29 I know how specifications are composed 3.3% 50.0% 3.3% 6.7% 4.3 36.7% 30
Q30 I understand the relationship of construction documents to construction quality 56.7% 3.3% 4.5 40.0% 30
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 6.7% 16.7% 23.3% 20.0% 3.3 33.3% 30
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.3% 43.3% 10.0% 4.2 43.3% 30
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 30.0% 3.3% 16.7% 4.1 50.0% 30
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 6.7% 20.0% 16.7% 16.7% 3.5 40.0% 30
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17090
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 4533: Construction Law
Response Rate: 28/31Primary Instructor: Chiarelli,Lawrence
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 96.4% 3.6% 28
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 7.4% 88.9% 3.7% 27
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.7% 3.6% 4.8 10.7% 28
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 64.3% 10.7% 4.5 25.0% 28
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 25.0% 3.6% 10.7% 4.1 60.7% 28
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 42.9% 7.1% 7.1% 4.2 42.9% 28
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 53.6% 3.6% 10.7% 4.4 32.1% 28
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 64.3% 17.9% 4.5 17.9% 28
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I understand the operation of the legal system on construction. 55.6% 3.7% 3.7% 4.4 37.0% 27
Q28 I can identify relevant legal issues. 53.6% 3.6% 4.5 42.9% 28
Q29 I can address and solve problems encountered in construction using the law. 53.6% 7.1% 4.5 39.3% 28
Q30 I can avoid mistakes commonly made in construction. 57.1% 10.7% 4.5 32.1% 28
Q31 I understand parties’ responsibilities and liabilities. 63.0% 3.7% 4.6 33.3% 27
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 3.6% 39.3% 10.7% 10.7% 4.0 35.7% 28
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.6% 78.6% 3.6% 4.6 14.3% 28
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 67.9% 7.1% 3.6% 4.5 21.4% 28
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 3.6% 64.3% 7.1% 4.5 25.0% 28
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: LCLB
Class Number: 17249
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 3563: CONSTRUCTION MODELING AND DATA STRUCTURES II
Response Rate: 8/13Primary Instructor: Rowshanrad,Ashkan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 8
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 8
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 62.5% 4.6 37.5% 8
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 12.5% 12.5% 4.1 25.0% 8
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 12.5% 50.0% 12.5% 3.9 25.0% 8
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 12.5% 12.5% 4.1 25.0% 8
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 12.5% 50.0% 12.5% 4.0 25.0% 8
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 12.5% 25.0% 12.5% 37.5% 3.3 12.5% 8
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 25.0% 4.3 25.0% 8
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 8
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 8
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 8
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17193
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CBE 3233: CHEM & BIOMOLECULAR ENG SEPARATIONS
Response Rate: 43/50Primary Instructor: Stiel,Leonard I
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 2.3% 93.0% 4.7% 43
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 9.3% 90.7% 43
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 4.7% 30.2% 7.0% 20.9% 3.8 37.2% 43
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 11.6% 20.9% 11.6% 18.6% 3.4 37.2% 43
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 2.4% 31.0% 11.9% 7.1% 3.9 47.6% 42
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 17.1% 17.1% 26.8% 17.1% 3.0 22.0% 41
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 28.6% 9.5% 2.4% 16.7% 23.8% 2.6 19.0% 42
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 23.8% 16.7% 28.6% 11.9% 2.8 19.0% 42
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I understand the fundamentals of diffusive and convective mass transfer. 14.3% 16.7% 21.4% 16.7% 3.1 31.0% 42
Q28 I can apply rate-based methods to the design of packed tower absorption columns. 11.9% 11.9% 23.8% 16.7% 3.1 35.7% 42
Q29 I can design absorption, distillation and extraction columns using equilibrium stage
methods
23.8% 9.5% 21.4% 23.8% 2.7 21.4% 42
Q30 I understand the fundamentals of multi-component distillation systems 16.7% 14.3% 19.0% 23.8% 3.0 26.2% 42
Q31 I am familiar with the design principles used for membrane separation processes. 23.8% 7.1% 16.7% 26.2% 2.8 26.2% 42
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 31.7% 7.3% 17.1% 26.8% 2.5 17.1% 41
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 26.2% 9.5% 19.0% 23.8% 2.7 21.4% 42
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 42.9% 9.5% 7.1% 11.9% 21.4% 2.2 7.1% 42
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 33.3% 9.5% 4.8% 11.9% 26.2% 2.5 14.3% 42
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 19.0% 21.4% 2.4% 14.3% 21.4% 3.1 21.4% 42
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16297
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6123: Financial Risk Management and Asset Pricing
Response Rate: 12/18Primary Instructor: Galy,Sebastien
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 16.7% 83.3% 12
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 8.3% 91.7% 12
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 83.3% 8.3% 4.7 8.3% 12
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 8.3% 58.3% 8.3% 16.7% 4.0 8.3% 12
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 58.3% 8.3% 16.7% 4.5 16.7% 12
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 8.3% 58.3% 8.3% 8.3% 4.3 16.7% 12
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 58.3% 16.7% 8.3% 4.2 16.7% 12
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 8.3% 41.7% 8.3% 25.0% 3.8 16.7% 12
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 8.3% 8.3% 4.3 33.3% 12
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 8.3% 50.0% 8.3% 4.2 33.3% 12
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 8.3% 50.0% 8.3% 4.1 33.3% 12
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 66.7% 8.3% 16.7% 4.3 8.3% 12
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16616
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 6623: Power Systems Economics and Planning
Response Rate: 5/9Primary Instructor: Suresh,Sindhu
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 5
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 20.0% 3.8 80.0% 5
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 20.0% 3.4 80.0% 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 20.0% 20.0% 3.2 60.0% 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 20.0% 40.0% 20.0% 3.6 20.0% 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 20.0% 4.2 80.0% 5
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 40.0% 20.0% 3.0 40.0% 5
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 80.0% 20.0% 4.6 5
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
40.0% 20.0% 20.0% 2.6 20.0% 5
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 20.0% 20.0% 40.0% 20.0% 2.6 5
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
20.0% 40.0% 3.2 40.0% 5
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.4 40.0% 5
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 20.0% 40.0% 3.8 40.0% 5
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 20.0% 20.0% 60.0% 3.5 5
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 20.0% 20.0% 60.0% 3.5 5
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 20.0% 20.0% 60.0% 3.5 5
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 20.0% 40.0% 3.8 40.0% 5
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 20.0% 20.0% 60.0% 3.0 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.0 100.0% 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.4 40.0% 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 20.0% 60.0% 4.0 20.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 23264
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6921: Selected Topics in Financial Engineering
Response Rate: 9/15Primary Instructor: Hoff,Benjamin
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 9
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 9
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 9
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 9
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 88.9% 11.1% 4.7 9
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 9
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 9
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I1
Class Number: 16296
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6111: Investment Banking and Brokerage
Response Rate: 21/22Primary Instructor: Chappe,Raphaele
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 21
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 21
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 57.1% 4.6 42.9% 21
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 52.4% 23.8% 4.3 23.8% 21
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 28.6% 4.8% 38.1% 3.9 28.6% 21
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 38.1% 28.6% 4.1 33.3% 21
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 66.7% 4.8% 4.7 28.6% 21
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 71.4% 4.8% 9.5% 4.7 14.3% 21
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 52.4% 9.5% 4.8% 4.3 33.3% 21
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 75.0% 10.0% 4.7 15.0% 20
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 76.2% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8 14.3% 21
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 61.9% 9.5% 4.5 28.6% 21
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 16726
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6111: Investment Banking and Brokerage
Response Rate: 10/9Primary Instructor: Chappe,Raphaele
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 10
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 70.0% 20.0% 4.5 10.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 10.0% 50.0% 10.0% 10.0% 3.9 20.0% 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 60.0% 30.0% 4.3 10.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 70.0% 10.0% 4.5 20.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 90.0% 10.0% 4.8 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 10.0% 80.0% 10.0% 4.4 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 70.0% 10.0% 4.5 20.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 60.0% 20.0% 4.2 20.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 60.0% 20.0% 4.2 20.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 16298
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6211: Financial Market Regulation
Response Rate: 6/7Primary Instructor: Chappe,Raphaele
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 6
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 66.7% 16.7% 4.5 16.7% 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 66.7% 16.7% 4.5 16.7% 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 16.7% 4.3 33.3% 6
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 16.7% 4.6 33.3% 6
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17505
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
STS 2224W: SCIENCE AND SEXUALITY
Response Rate: 32/18Primary Instructor: Benezra,Amber
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 32
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 30
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 32
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 87.5% 12.5% 4.8 32
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 32
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 93.8% 6.3% 4.8 32
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 81.3% 6.3% 4.7 12.5% 32
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 81.3% 4.8 18.8% 32
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have enhanced my ability to effectively communicate including being able to give
oral presentations that increase knowledge, foster understanding, or encourage
change.
60.0% 6.7% 4.5 33.3% 30
Q28 I have enhanced by ability to read effectively, including being able to extract and to
create meaning from the written texts.
46.7% 6.7% 4.4 46.7% 30
Q29 I developed perspectives of the humanities and social sciences to bear within
technical discourse.
86.7% 4.9 13.3% 30
Q30 I have enhanced my ability to understand and demonstrate the relationship
between content of scientific and technological knowledge, and the social and
intellectual context in which it is created.
86.7% 4.9 13.3% 30
Q31 I have enhanced my ability to understand and demonstrate how social processes
frame scientific and technological enterprises, including theory construction,
invention, and innovation.
80.0% 4.8 20.0% 30
Q32 I have enhanced my ability to understand and demonstrate how science and
technology shape society (in historical, philosophical, sociological, cultural and
technical ways).
80.0% 4.8 20.0% 30
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 81.3% 6.3% 4.7 12.5% 32
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 93.8% 4.9 6.3% 32
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 32
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 56.3% 4.6 43.8% 32
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 22250
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
EN 2114W: MACHINES MADE OF WORDS I: POETRY AS DESIGN
Response Rate: 16/18Primary Instructor: Gallagher,Jean
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 16
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 6.3% 87.5% 6.3% 16
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 16
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 16
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 16
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 16
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 75.0% 6.3% 18.8% 4.6 16
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have enhanced my ability to effectively communicate including being able to give
oral presentations that increase knowledge, foster understanding, or encourage
change.
73.3% 4.7 26.7% 15
Q28 I have enhanced by ability to read effectively, including being able to extract and to
create meaning from the written texts.
80.0% 4.8 20.0% 15
Q29 I developed perspectives of the humanities and social sciences to bear within
technical discourse.
86.7% 4.9 13.3% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 93.8% 4.9 6.3% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 93.8% 4.9 6.3% 16
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 93.8% 4.9 6.3% 16
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 17441
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 1002: FOUNDATIONS OF MANAGEMENT
Response Rate: 10/21Primary Instructor: Kupferman,Howard A.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 10.0% 90.0% 10
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 10
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 10.0% 40.0% 10.0% 10.0% 3.8 30.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 30.0% 10.0% 4.2 60.0% 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 30.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.0 50.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 40.0% 20.0% 4.2 40.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 60.0% 10.0% 4.5 30.0% 10
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 40.0% 10.0% 4.3 50.0% 10
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
30.0% 4.3 70.0% 10
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
30.0% 10.0% 4.2 60.0% 10
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
40.0% 10.0% 4.2 50.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 3.8 40.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.2 30.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 10.0% 50.0% 4.2 40.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.2 30.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17028
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 2304: Marketing
Response Rate: 14/35Primary Instructor: Kupferman,Howard A.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 7.1% 85.7% 7.1% 14
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 7.1% 85.7% 7.1% 14
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 64.3% 7.1% 7.1% 4.6 21.4% 14
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 57.1% 7.1% 7.1% 14.3% 4.3 14.3% 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 35.7% 7.1% 42.9% 3.9 14.3% 14
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 28.6% 7.1% 7.1% 14.3% 4.0 42.9% 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 28.6% 7.1% 7.1% 21.4% 3.9 35.7% 14
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 35.7% 7.1% 7.1% 21.4% 4.0 28.6% 14
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 35.7% 7.1% 14.3% 4.2 42.9% 14
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
21.4% 7.1% 7.1% 35.7% 3.7 28.6% 14
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
35.7% 7.1% 7.1% 28.6% 3.9 21.4% 14
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
28.6% 7.1% 28.6% 4.0 35.7% 14
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 7.1% 21.4% 7.1% 7.1% 28.6% 3.5 28.6% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 35.7% 7.1% 28.6% 4.1 28.6% 14
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 28.6% 7.1% 14.3% 14.3% 3.8 35.7% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 42.9% 7.1% 7.1% 14.3% 4.2 28.6% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 23140
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 6403: Fundamentals of Analog Integrated Circuit Design
Response Rate: 28/49Primary Instructor: SHAHRJERDI,DAVOOD
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 28
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 3.6% 96.4% 28
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 67.9% 3.6% 3.6% 4.6 25.0% 28
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 57.1% 3.6% 7.1% 4.4 32.1% 28
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 75.0% 3.6% 3.6% 4.6 17.9% 28
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 75.0% 3.6% 4.7 21.4% 28
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 67.9% 3.6% 7.1% 4.5 21.4% 28
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 3.6% 75.0% 7.1% 7.1% 4.4 7.1% 28
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 42.9% 14.3% 3.6% 4.1 39.3% 28
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 67.9% 7.1% 4.6 25.0% 28
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 3.6% 67.9% 7.1% 4.5 21.4% 28
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 67.9% 3.6% 14.3% 4.5 14.3% 28
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16380
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6173: Performance Management and Reward Systems
Response Rate: 8/11Primary Instructor: DeLuca,Matthew
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 8
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 8
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 87.5% 12.5% 4.6 8
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 87.5% 12.5% 4.6 8
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 75.0% 12.5% 4.5 12.5% 8
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 8
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 87.5% 12.5% 4.6 8
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 87.5% 12.5% 4.6 8
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 75.0% 12.5% 4.6 12.5% 8
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
62.5% 4.6 37.5% 8
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
75.0% 4.8 25.0% 8
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 62.5% 4.6 37.5% 8
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 75.0% 12.5% 4.5 12.5% 8
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 75.0% 12.5% 4.5 12.5% 8
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LVL1
Class Number: 16766
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6173: Performance Management and Reward Systems
Response Rate: 1/4Primary Instructor: DeLuca,Matthew
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 1
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 1
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 2.0 1
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 3.0 1
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 1
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
100.0% 5.0 1
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
100.0% 5.0 1
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
100.0% 5.0 1
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 100.0% 5.0 1
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 100.0% 5.0 1
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
100.0% 1.0 1
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 4.0 100.0% 1
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
100.0% 5.0 1
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 100.0% 5.0 1
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 100.0% 5.0 1
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 100.0% 1.0 1
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 100.0% 2.0 1
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 100.0% 1.0 1
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 100.0% 5.0 1
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 100.0% 5.0 1
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LVL1
Class Number: 16766
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6173: Performance Management and Reward Systems
Response Rate: 1/4Primary Instructor: DeLuca,Matthew
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: C3
Class Number: 17653
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 2034: Linear Algebra and Differential Equations
Response Rate: 3/23Primary Instructor: Prabhu,Vaishali T
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 3
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 3
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 66.7% 33.3% 4.3 3
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 3
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 33.3% 33.3% 4.0 33.3% 3
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
100.0% 5.0 3
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 3.0 3
Q29 I need more HW problems. 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 3.0 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 33.3% 3.7 33.3% 3
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A2LB
Class Number: 17685
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BMS 1004: Introduction to Cell and Molecular Biology
Response Rate: 11/14Primary Instructor: Zhang,Kevin
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
9.1% 63.6% 4.4 27.3% 11
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 9.1% 72.7% 4.5 18.2% 11
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 72.7% 4.7 27.3% 11
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 9.1% 72.7% 9.1% 4.4 9.1% 11
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 54.5% 4.5 45.5% 11
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 9.1% 54.5% 4.3 36.4% 11
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 60.0% 20.0% 4.2 20.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
Q40 Value was added to my education. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 63.6% 9.1% 9.1% 4.4 18.2% 11
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 54.5% 9.1% 4.5 36.4% 11
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
63.6% 9.1% 4.5 27.3% 11
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 63.6% 4.6 36.4% 11
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: ALEC
Class Number: 17246
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 2213: FLUID MECHANICS AND HYDRAULICS
Response Rate: 15/18Primary Instructor: Kutt,Lembit M
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 20.0% 80.0% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 93.3% 6.7% 15
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 53.3% 6.7% 4.5 40.0% 15
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 40.0% 33.3% 4.1 26.7% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 40.0% 13.3% 6.7% 20.0% 2.6 20.0% 15
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 40.0% 13.3% 13.3% 4.0 33.3% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 13.3% 26.7% 20.0% 6.7% 3.4 33.3% 15
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 26.7% 33.3% 13.3% 6.7% 3.2 20.0% 15
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an understanding of the nomenclature and standard units associated
with fluid mechanics as it relates to civil engineering and become adept in their use
in problem solving.
42.9% 7.1% 7.1% 4.2 42.9% 14
Q28 I learned how to quantify fluid pressure and forces on submerged surfaces under
static conditions.
50.0% 7.1% 7.1% 4.3 35.7% 14
Q29 I learned how to quantify flow rate, pressure and forces in flowing fluids by using
conservation of mass, energy and momentum.
50.0% 7.1% 14.3% 4.2 28.6% 14
Q30 I Use laboratory exercises to develop better understanding of fluid properties, and
static and dynamic behavior of real fluids.
7.1% 21.4% 7.1% 7.1% 3.8 57.1% 14
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 6.7% 33.3% 6.7% 13.3% 3.9 40.0% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 20.0% 33.3% 6.7% 13.3% 3.5 26.7% 15
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 20.0% 26.7% 13.3% 13.3% 3.3 26.7% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 26.7% 26.7% 6.7% 13.3% 3.2 26.7% 15
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 7.1% 21.4% 7.1% 7.1% 3.8 57.1% 14
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
7.1% 28.6% 7.1% 14.3% 3.8 42.9% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 22248
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
HI 2364: HISTORY OF AVIATION & AVIATION TECHNOLOGY
Response Rate: 12/15Primary Instructor: Kinney,Jeremy Ryan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 12
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 12
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 91.7% 8.3% 4.8 12
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 91.7% 4.9 8.3% 12
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 58.3% 25.0% 4.1 16.7% 12
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 75.0% 8.3% 4.7 16.7% 12
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 58.3% 8.3% 4.4 33.3% 12
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 58.3% 4.6 41.7% 12
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 12
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
58.3% 4.6 41.7% 12
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 66.7% 8.3% 4.5 25.0% 12
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 58.3% 8.3% 4.5 33.3% 12
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 33.3% 66.7% 3.7 12
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 41.7% 41.7% 4.0 16.7% 12
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 41.7% 41.7% 4.0 16.7% 12
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 16.7% 41.7% 8.3% 16.7% 3.6 16.7% 12
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 16.7% 41.7% 8.3% 16.7% 3.6 16.7% 12
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 58.3% 4.6 41.7% 12
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 58.3% 4.6 41.7% 12
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 8.3% 66.7% 4.4 25.0% 12
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 23998
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 6923: Simulation Tools and Software for Mechatronics and Robotics
Response Rate: 12/15Primary Instructor: Mummolo,Carlotta
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 12
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 12
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 58.3% 8.3% 4.5 33.3% 12
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 75.0% 8.3% 4.6 16.7% 12
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 66.7% 16.7% 4.3 16.7% 12
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 83.3% 8.3% 4.8 8.3% 12
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 75.0% 8.3% 8.3% 4.5 8.3% 12
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 16.7% 4.3 33.3% 12
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 75.0% 8.3% 4.7 16.7% 12
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 66.7% 25.0% 4.4 8.3% 12
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 83.3% 16.7% 4.7 12
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16234
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6033: Design and Analysis of Algorithms I
Response Rate: 33/60Primary Instructor: Cao,Houwei
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 33
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 33
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 3.0% 30.3% 6.1% 9.1% 4.0 51.5% 33
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 3.0% 45.5% 3.0% 6.1% 4.2 42.4% 33
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 3.0% 57.6% 6.1% 12.1% 4.2 21.2% 33
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 60.6% 9.1% 4.4 30.3% 33
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 3.0% 36.4% 6.1% 21.2% 3.9 33.3% 33
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 3.0% 48.5% 12.1% 4.3 36.4% 33
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 3.0% 42.4% 6.1% 12.1% 4.1 36.4% 33
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.0% 42.4% 3.0% 12.1% 4.2 39.4% 33
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 6.1% 36.4% 6.1% 21.2% 3.8 30.3% 33
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 48.5% 15.2% 4.3 36.4% 33
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: B2RC
Class Number: 17063
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 1013: MECHANICS
Response Rate: 23/25Primary Instructor: Debroy,Partha
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 4.3% 91.3% 4.8 4.3% 23
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
4.3% 78.3% 13.0% 4.5 4.3% 23
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 4.3% 78.3% 8.7% 4.6 8.7% 23
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 4.3% 82.6% 4.3% 4.6 8.7% 23
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A2RC
Class Number: 17294
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2023: ELECTRICITY, MAGNETISM, & FLUIDS
Response Rate: 19/25Primary Instructor: Debroy,Partha
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 19
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
100.0% 5.0 19
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 94.7% 4.9 5.3% 19
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 94.7% 4.9 5.3% 19
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: C2RC
Class Number: 17229
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2033: WAVES, OPTICS, & THERMODYNAMICS
Response Rate: 19/28Primary Instructor: Debroy,Partha
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 19
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
94.7% 5.3% 4.9 19
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 78.9% 10.5% 4.7 10.5% 19
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 100.0% 5.0 19
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16537
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6133: Computer Architecture I
Response Rate: 21/21Primary Instructor: Padman,Vikram
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 4.8% 90.5% 4.8% 21
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 21
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 4.8% 23.8% 9.5% 19.0% 3.7 42.9% 21
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 9.5% 14.3% 33.3% 4.8% 3.1 38.1% 21
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 33.3% 9.5% 28.6% 14.3% 2.4 14.3% 21
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 4.8% 38.1% 4.8% 38.1% 3.8 14.3% 21
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 28.6% 19.0% 14.3% 14.3% 2.9 23.8% 21
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 9.5% 23.8% 23.8% 9.5% 3.4 33.3% 21
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 28.6% 28.6% 14.3% 4.8% 3.1 23.8% 21
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 14.3% 28.6% 23.8% 4.8% 3.3 28.6% 21
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
33.3% 14.3% 19.0% 4.8% 2.7 28.6% 21
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 28.6% 19.0% 4.8% 14.3% 3.1 33.3% 21
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
19.0% 23.8% 19.0% 23.8% 3.0 14.3% 21
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 14.3% 23.8% 4.8% 23.8% 3.5 33.3% 21
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 19.0% 14.3% 19.0% 19.0% 3.0 28.6% 21
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 4.8% 33.3% 42.9% 3.8 19.0% 21
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 4.8% 33.3% 9.5% 42.9% 3.6 9.5% 21
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 4.8% 28.6% 4.8% 9.5% 33.3% 3.6 19.0% 21
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 23.8% 28.6% 19.0% 3.4 28.6% 21
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 19.0% 28.6% 23.8% 3.5 28.6% 21
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 23.8% 9.5% 19.0% 14.3% 2.9 33.3% 21
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 19.0% 33.3% 9.5% 9.5% 3.5 28.6% 21
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 33.3% 19.0% 9.5% 14.3% 2.9 23.8% 21
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 9.5% 33.3% 23.8% 19.0% 3.4 14.3% 21
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16544
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 6153: THERMODYNAMICS OF HVAC SYSTEMS
Response Rate: 11/12Primary Instructor: Vedavarz,Ali
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 9.1% 90.9% 11
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 10
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 70.0% 4.7 30.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 72.7% 4.7 27.3% 11
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 63.6% 4.6 36.4% 11
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Review of the thermodynamics principles 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
Q28 In-Depth Psychometric analysis, air conditioning processes, HVAC systems, and
indoor air quality
81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
Q29 HVAC systems 63.6% 4.6 36.4% 11
Q30 Term Project 63.6% 9.1% 4.5 27.3% 11
Q31 Energy analysis and Bin Method. Analysis of absorption and direct expansion
cooling systems
54.5% 4.5 45.5% 11
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 72.7% 9.1% 4.6 18.2% 11
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 90.9% 9.1% 4.8 11
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 72.7% 9.1% 4.6 18.2% 11
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16545
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 6163: FLUID MECHANICS FOR HVAC SYSTEMS
Response Rate: 8/8Primary Instructor: Vedavarz,Ali
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 12.5% 87.5% 8
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 12.5% 87.5% 8
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 8
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 75.0% 12.5% 4.6 12.5% 8
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 8
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 8
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Review of the fluid mechanics principles including fully developed internal flow 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
Q28 Piping design: 1) pipe sizing methods, 2) pump performance analysis and selection,
and 3) hydronic system design
85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
Q29 Air distribution design: 1) air duct sizing methods, 2) fan performance analysis,
elections and sizing, and 3) air variable volume systems
85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
Q30 Term Project 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 12.5% 12.5% 4.1 25.0% 8
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 8
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16285
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 6213: Introduction to Solid Mechanics
Response Rate: 41/44Primary Instructor: Gupta,Nikhil
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 19.5% 78.0% 2.4% 41
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 9.8% 87.8% 2.4% 41
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 68.3% 2.4% 2.4% 4.6 26.8% 41
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 63.4% 12.2% 7.3% 4.3 17.1% 41
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 56.1% 12.2% 12.2% 4.2 19.5% 41
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 2.4% 56.1% 7.3% 4.9% 4.3 29.3% 41
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 2.4% 48.8% 2.4% 7.3% 4.9% 4.2 34.1% 41
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 61.0% 2.4% 4.6 36.6% 41
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Understand the concept of stress and strain in three-dimensional continua 56.8% 2.7% 4.5 40.5% 37
Q28 Understand the use of energy methods to compute displacements in structures 2.7% 43.2% 5.4% 13.5% 4.1 35.1% 37
Q29 Understand the phenomenon of cross-section warping in the torsion of beams and
learn design fundamentals for thin-walled structures
5.4% 48.6% 13.5% 10.8% 3.9 21.6% 37
Q30 Understand uniform and non-uniform bending of beams with a focus on
thin-walled structures
5.6% 52.8% 11.1% 11.1% 4.0 19.4% 36
Q31 Understand the phenomenon of buckling and learn design elements of slender
columns
66.7% 2.8% 2.8% 4.6 27.8% 36
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 51.2% 12.2% 9.8% 4.2 26.8% 41
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 2.4% 51.2% 7.3% 4.9% 4.2 34.1% 41
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 7.3% 56.1% 4.9% 7.3% 4.2 24.4% 41
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.9% 48.8% 17.1% 4.2 29.3% 41
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 59.5% 2.7% 2.7% 4.5 35.1% 37
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
2.7% 45.9% 13.5% 8.1% 4.0 29.7% 37
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 47.2% 5.6% 11.1% 4.3 36.1% 36
A41 I have enhanced my ability to recognize the need for, and an ability to engage in
life-long learning
44.4% 2.8% 8.3% 4.3 44.4% 36
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
55.6% 8.3% 11.1% 4.3 25.0% 36
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 23999
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 7243: Advanced Composite Materials
Response Rate: 4/7Primary Instructor: Gupta,Nikhil
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 4
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 4
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
A41 I have enhanced my ability to develop a recognition of the need for, and an ability
to engage in life-long learning
75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16669
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6051: Insurance Finance and Actuarial Science
Response Rate: 7/6Primary Instructor: Lessing,Brian R
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 7
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 7
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.7% 14.3% 4.7 7
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 85.7% 14.3% 4.7 7
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 14.3% 71.4% 4.3 14.3% 7
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 14.3% 71.4% 14.3% 4.1 7
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 14.3% 85.7% 4.4 7
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 14.3% 85.7% 4.4 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 14.3% 85.7% 4.4 7
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 71.4% 14.3% 4.4 14.3% 7
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 85.7% 14.3% 4.6 7
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 85.7% 14.3% 4.6 7
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17531
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
MD 2314: Interactive Narrative
Response Rate: 18/19Primary Instructor: Howard,Christian
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 16.7% 77.8% 5.6% 18
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 22.2% 72.2% 5.6% 18
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 88.9% 5.6% 4.8 5.6% 18
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 94.4% 4.9 5.6% 18
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 5.6% 55.6% 5.6% 5.6% 4.2 27.8% 18
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 55.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 4.4 27.8% 18
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 5.6% 72.2% 5.6% 4.5 16.7% 18
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 72.2% 11.1% 11.1% 4.4 5.6% 18
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 61.1% 5.6% 11.1% 4.5 22.2% 18
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 5.6% 77.8% 4.6 16.7% 18
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 88.9% 5.6% 4.8 5.6% 18
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 5.6% 72.2% 4.6 22.2% 18
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: L
Class Number: 17047
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 1324: Integrated Calculus I for Engineers
Response Rate: 1/23Primary Instructor: Esposito,Joseph F
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 1
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 1
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 1
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 1
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.0 100.0% 1
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
100.0% 5.0 1
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q29 I need more HW problems. 100.0% 1.0 1
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.0 100.0% 1
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 16196
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6013: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
Response Rate: 23/24Primary Instructor: Feffer,Jonathan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 23
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 23
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 4.3% 73.9% 4.6 21.7% 23
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 4.3% 73.9% 4.6 21.7% 23
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.3% 69.6% 13.0% 4.4 13.0% 23
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 4.3% 73.9% 4.3% 4.3% 4.5 13.0% 23
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 4.3% 69.6% 4.3% 4.5 21.7% 23
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.3% 69.6% 4.6 26.1% 23
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 13.6% 45.5% 4.5% 4.5% 3.9 31.8% 22
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
9.1% 40.9% 4.5% 4.5% 4.0 40.9% 22
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
13.6% 45.5% 9.1% 4.0 31.8% 22
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
9.1% 40.9% 4.5% 4.5% 9.1% 4.0 31.8% 22
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.3% 47.8% 4.3% 8.7% 4.2 34.8% 23
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 8.7% 43.5% 4.2 47.8% 23
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 8.7% 56.5% 8.7% 4.2 26.1% 23
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 8.7% 39.1% 8.7% 4.0 43.5% 23
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 17475
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 2413: DESIGN & ANALYSIS OF ALGORITHMS
Response Rate: 25/42Primary Instructor: Hellerstein,Lisa
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 4.0% 96.0% 25
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 24
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 25
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 76.0% 8.0% 4.7 16.0% 25
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 44.0% 4.0% 4.0% 12.0% 4.3 36.0% 25
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 40.0% 4.0% 8.0% 8.0% 4.2 40.0% 25
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 52.0% 12.0% 4.0% 4.2 32.0% 25
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.0% 56.0% 8.0% 8.0% 4.2 24.0% 25
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 16.0% 36.0% 8.0% 8.0% 3.6 32.0% 25
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 52.0% 8.0% 8.0% 4.3 32.0% 25
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 72.0% 4.0% 4.7 24.0% 25
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 12.0% 48.0% 4.0% 8.0% 4.0 28.0% 25
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16247
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6923: Machine Learning
Response Rate: 34/39Primary Instructor: Hellerstein,Lisa
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 34
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.9% 94.1% 34
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 94.1% 4.9 5.9% 34
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 93.9% 3.0% 5.0 3.0% 33
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 41.2% 14.7% 17.6% 3.9 26.5% 34
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 70.6% 2.9% 4.7 26.5% 34
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 2.9% 73.5% 2.9% 4.6 20.6% 34
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 67.6% 11.8% 8.8% 4.4 11.8% 34
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 61.8% 2.9% 8.8% 4.5 26.5% 34
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 70.6% 2.9% 4.7 26.5% 34
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 88.2% 2.9% 4.9 8.8% 34
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 73.5% 4.7 26.5% 34
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16937
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6883: Financial Computing
Response Rate: 31/30Primary Instructor: Tang,Song
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 31
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 31
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 96.8% 5.0 3.2% 31
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 83.3% 3.3% 4.8 13.3% 30
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 87.1% 4.9 12.9% 31
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 87.1% 3.2% 4.8 9.7% 31
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 87.1% 3.2% 4.8 9.7% 31
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 80.6% 3.2% 4.8 16.1% 31
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 6.5% 64.5% 3.2% 4.4 25.8% 31
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.2% 83.9% 3.2% 4.7 9.7% 31
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 3.2% 83.9% 3.2% 4.7 9.7% 31
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 3.2% 83.9% 3.2% 4.7 9.7% 31
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 16997
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6883: Financial Computing
Response Rate: 16/26Primary Instructor: Tang,Song
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 16
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 16
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 93.8% 4.9 6.3% 16
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 16
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 16
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 81.3% 4.8 18.8% 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 16
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 81.3% 6.3% 6.3% 4.8 6.3% 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 75.0% 6.3% 4.6 18.8% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 81.3% 4.8 18.8% 16
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 16
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 16942
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 7831: TOPICS IN FINANCIAL AND RISK ENGINEERING I
Response Rate: 20/23Primary Instructor: Tang,Song
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 20
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 20
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 20
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 95.0% 5.0% 4.9 20
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 20
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 20
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 85.0% 4.8 15.0% 20
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 85.0% 5.0% 4.8 10.0% 20
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 55.0% 5.0% 4.5 40.0% 20
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 20
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 20
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 85.0% 4.8 15.0% 20
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: ALAB
Class Number: 17581
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 3161: Materials Engineering Laboratory
Response Rate: 5/7Primary Instructor: Jin,Weihua
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 80.0% 2.4 20.0% 5
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 5
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 40.0% 40.0% 4.0 20.0% 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q40 Value was added to my education. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: BLEC
Class Number: 17585
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 3162: Materials Engineering
Response Rate: 5/5Primary Instructor: Jin,Weihua
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 20.0% 80.0% 5
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 20.0% 60.0% 3.0 20.0% 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 20.0% 4.2 80.0% 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 20.0% 40.0% 3.0 40.0% 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 20.0% 4.2 80.0% 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 5
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16268
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 6023: Materials for Civil Engineers
Response Rate: 26/28Primary Instructor: Jin,Weihua
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 7.7% 92.3% 26
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 7.7% 92.3% 26
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 73.1% 7.7% 11.5% 4.7 7.7% 26
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 68.0% 12.0% 4.6 20.0% 25
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 3.8% 46.2% 15.4% 3.8% 7.7% 4.2 23.1% 26
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 53.8% 7.7% 3.8% 4.3 34.6% 26
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 65.4% 3.8% 4.6 30.8% 26
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 69.2% 3.8% 3.8% 7.7% 4.6 15.4% 26
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 7.7% 50.0% 7.7% 7.7% 4.0 26.9% 26
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.8% 61.5% 3.8% 3.8% 4.4 26.9% 26
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 69.2% 7.7% 4.6 23.1% 26
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 3.8% 61.5% 7.7% 3.8% 4.3 23.1% 26
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A2RC
Class Number: 17059
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 1013: MECHANICS
Response Rate: 24/28Primary Instructor: Nachumi,Benjamin E
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 71.4% 4.8% 4.8% 4.7 19.0% 21
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
57.1% 9.5% 4.8% 14.3% 4.4 14.3% 21
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 66.7% 4.8% 4.8% 4.6 23.8% 21
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 57.1% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.5 28.6% 21
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: A2RC
Class Number: 17221
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2033: WAVES, OPTICS, & THERMODYNAMICS
Response Rate: 19/21Primary Instructor: Nachumi,Benjamin E
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 18
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
52.9% 29.4% 4.2 17.6% 17
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 70.6% 11.8% 4.5 17.6% 17
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 5.6% 61.1% 4.4 33.3% 18
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: C1RC
Class Number: 17227
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2033: WAVES, OPTICS, & THERMODYNAMICS
Response Rate: 25/29Primary Instructor: Nachumi,Benjamin E
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 56.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.4 36.0% 25
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
44.0% 8.0% 24.0% 4.0 24.0% 25
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 64.0% 8.0% 4.6 28.0% 25
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 4.0% 76.0% 4.0% 4.6 16.0% 25
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: D
Class Number: 21642
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2121: General Physics Laboratory I
Response Rate: 16/21Primary Instructor: Nachumi,Benjamin E
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
6.3% 50.0% 6.3% 6.3% 12.5% 4.1 18.8% 16
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 6.3% 43.8% 6.3% 12.5% 4.1 31.3% 16
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 6.3% 68.8% 12.5% 4.4 12.5% 16
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 37.5% 6.3% 6.3% 4.2 50.0% 16
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 25.0% 25.0% 18.8% 3.6 31.3% 16
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 6.3% 50.0% 6.3% 12.5% 4.1 25.0% 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 6.3% 31.3% 18.8% 12.5% 3.6 31.3% 16
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 43.8% 12.5% 18.8% 4.0 25.0% 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 6.3% 6.3% 18.8% 25.0% 3.3 43.8% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 6.3% 18.8% 12.5% 25.0% 3.5 37.5% 16
Q40 Value was added to my education. 12.5% 18.8% 6.3% 37.5% 3.3 25.0% 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 18.8% 6.3% 12.5% 31.3% 2.9 31.3% 16
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A06 I have enhanced my ability to analyze and interpret data appropriately. 7.1% 28.6% 14.3% 3.9 50.0% 14
A17 I have enhanced my ability to conduct experiments to validate hypotheses and
theories.
14.3% 14.3% 21.4% 3.6 50.0% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: G
Class Number: 17566
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2131: General Physics Laboratory II
Response Rate: 31/32Primary Instructor: Nachumi,Benjamin E
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
64.5% 3.2% 4.7 32.3% 31
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 56.7% 3.3% 6.7% 3.3% 4.4 30.0% 30
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 67.7% 3.2% 3.2% 4.6 25.8% 31
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 3.2% 38.7% 3.2% 9.7% 3.2% 4.1 41.9% 31
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 3.2% 22.6% 3.2% 16.1% 12.9% 3.7 41.9% 31
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 12.9% 25.8% 3.2% 22.6% 6.5% 3.3 29.0% 31
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 32.3% 3.2% 19.4% 12.9% 3.8 32.3% 31
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 35.5% 3.2% 6.5% 12.9% 4.1 41.9% 31
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 6.5% 25.8% 3.2% 19.4% 9.7% 3.6 35.5% 31
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 6.5% 25.8% 3.2% 16.1% 35.5% 3.4 12.9% 31
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.2% 19.4% 3.2% 19.4% 25.8% 3.4 29.0% 31
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 12.9% 16.1% 3.2% 22.6% 19.4% 3.1 25.8% 31
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A06 I have enhanced my ability to analyze and interpret data appropriately. 3.4% 31.0% 3.4% 10.3% 4.1 51.7% 29
A17 I have enhanced my ability to conduct experiments to validate hypotheses and
theories.
6.9% 24.1% 3.4% 3.4% 13.8% 3.8 48.3% 29
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 5 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17085
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 1122: Introduction to Computer Science
Response Rate: 86/150Primary Instructor: Memon,Nasir
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 5.8% 90.7% 3.5% 86
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 4.7% 91.9% 3.5% 86
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 5.9% 45.9% 2.4% 10.6% 4.1 35.3% 85
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 4.7% 19.8% 5.8% 1.2% 31.4% 3.7 37.2% 86
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 8.2% 9.4% 20.0% 8.2% 3.4 54.1% 85
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 5.8% 27.9% 1.2% 4.7% 16.3% 3.8 44.2% 86
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 10.6% 12.9% 1.2% 16.5% 12.9% 3.3 45.9% 85
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 17.4% 3.5% 7.0% 15.1% 34.9% 2.8 22.1% 86
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 23.3% 7.0% 1.2% 17.4% 18.6% 2.8 32.6% 86
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 9.3% 18.6% 3.5% 7.0% 17.4% 3.6 44.2% 86
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 7.0% 26.7% 2.3% 5.8% 14.0% 3.8 44.2% 86
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 14.0% 16.3% 2.3% 12.8% 22.1% 3.3 32.6% 86
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17696
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 3923: COMPUTER SECURITY
Response Rate: 41/47Primary Instructor: Memon,Nasir
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 14.6% 82.9% 2.4% 41
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 7.3% 87.8% 4.9% 41
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 9.8% 43.9% 9.8% 12.2% 3.8 24.4% 41
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 7.3% 41.5% 4.9% 14.6% 4.0 31.7% 41
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 22.0% 14.6% 24.4% 4.9% 3.0 34.1% 41
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 7.3% 26.8% 12.2% 24.4% 3.6 29.3% 41
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 12.5% 30.0% 17.5% 12.5% 3.5 27.5% 40
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 12.2% 24.4% 17.1% 22.0% 3.3 24.4% 41
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 9.8% 19.5% 24.4% 19.5% 3.2 26.8% 41
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 9.8% 39.0% 7.3% 19.5% 3.8 24.4% 41
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 12.2% 34.1% 2.4% 19.5% 3.7 31.7% 41
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 14.6% 31.7% 17.1% 14.6% 3.4 22.0% 41
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16796
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6813: Information, Security and Privacy
Response Rate: 41/47Primary Instructor: Memon,Nasir
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 14.6% 82.9% 2.4% 41
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 7.3% 87.8% 4.9% 41
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 9.8% 43.9% 9.8% 12.2% 3.8 24.4% 41
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 7.3% 41.5% 4.9% 14.6% 4.0 31.7% 41
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 22.0% 14.6% 24.4% 4.9% 3.0 34.1% 41
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 7.3% 26.8% 12.2% 24.4% 3.6 29.3% 41
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 12.5% 30.0% 17.5% 12.5% 3.5 27.5% 40
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 12.2% 24.4% 17.1% 22.0% 3.3 24.4% 41
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 9.8% 19.5% 24.4% 19.5% 3.2 26.8% 41
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 9.8% 39.0% 7.3% 19.5% 3.8 24.4% 41
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 12.2% 34.1% 2.4% 19.5% 3.7 31.7% 41
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 14.6% 31.7% 17.1% 14.6% 3.4 22.0% 41
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16885
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
IE 7873: LEAN MANUFACTURING
Response Rate: 17/17Primary Instructor: Gupta,Suresh
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 17
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 11.8% 88.2% 17
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 5.9% 88.2% 4.7 5.9% 17
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 94.1% 5.9% 5.0 17
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 5.9% 94.1% 4.8 17
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 64.7% 5.9% 4.5 29.4% 17
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 5.9% 94.1% 4.8 17
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 88.2% 4.9 11.8% 17
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 100.0% 5.0 17
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
94.1% 4.9 5.9% 17
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
82.4% 4.8 17.6% 17
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
94.1% 4.9 5.9% 17
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 70.6% 11.8% 4.6 17.6% 17
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 17
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 17
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 94.1% 4.9 5.9% 17
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 17157
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FIN 2203: Corporate Finance and Financial Markets
Response Rate: 19/24Primary Instructor: Larrymore,Norris L.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 19
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.3% 89.5% 5.3% 19
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 42.1% 10.5% 10.5% 4.1 36.8% 19
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 42.1% 15.8% 4.1 42.1% 19
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 10.5% 15.8% 26.3% 5.3% 3.3 42.1% 19
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 5.3% 36.8% 15.8% 10.5% 3.8 31.6% 19
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 42.1% 21.1% 15.8% 3.8 21.1% 19
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 10.5% 31.6% 26.3% 15.8% 3.3 15.8% 19
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 21.1% 10.5% 10.5% 3.9 57.9% 19
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 42.1% 21.1% 5.3% 3.9 31.6% 19
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 10.5% 31.6% 10.5% 21.1% 3.6 26.3% 19
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 52.6% 21.1% 10.5% 4.0 15.8% 19
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: EMOT
Class Number: 16362
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6083: ECONOMICS
Response Rate: 43/46Primary Instructor: Mourdoukoutas,Pavlos
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 43
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 2.4% 97.6% 42
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 90.7% 4.9 9.3% 43
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 2.4% 78.6% 2.4% 4.7 16.7% 42
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 2.3% 65.1% 4.7% 2.3% 4.5 25.6% 43
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 69.0% 4.8% 4.6 26.2% 42
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 76.7% 2.3% 4.7 20.9% 43
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 71.4% 4.8% 4.8% 4.6 19.0% 42
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 65.1% 2.3% 2.3% 4.6 30.2% 43
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
58.1% 4.6 41.9% 43
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
67.4% 4.7 32.6% 43
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
2.3% 72.1% 4.7 25.6% 43
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 53.5% 4.7% 11.6% 4.3 30.2% 43
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 81.4% 4.8 18.6% 43
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 81.4% 2.3% 4.8 16.3% 43
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 69.8% 2.3% 4.7 27.9% 43
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16966
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6083: ECONOMICS
Response Rate: 7/12Primary Instructor: Mourdoukoutas,Pavlos
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 7
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 7
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 57.1% 14.3% 4.4 28.6% 7
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 42.9% 28.6% 4.1 28.6% 7
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 42.9% 14.3% 14.3% 4.0 28.6% 7
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 71.4% 14.3% 4.6 14.3% 7
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 16.7% 16.7% 3.7 66.7% 6
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
14.3% 14.3% 14.3% 3.7 57.1% 7
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
14.3% 14.3% 3.9 71.4% 7
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
14.3% 14.3% 4.0 71.4% 7
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 42.9% 14.3% 4.3 42.9% 7
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 57.1% 14.3% 4.3 28.6% 7
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
42.9% 4.4 57.1% 7
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
42.9% 4.4 57.1% 7
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 71.4% 14.3% 4.6 14.3% 7
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 71.4% 14.3% 4.6 14.3% 7
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 57.1% 14.3% 4.4 28.6% 7
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 71.4% 14.3% 4.6 14.3% 7
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 85.7% 14.3% 4.7 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 14.3% 28.6% 14.3% 3.6 42.9% 7
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16966
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6083: ECONOMICS
Response Rate: 7/12Primary Instructor: Mourdoukoutas,Pavlos
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 42.9% 14.3% 14.3% 4.0 28.6% 7
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 42.9% 14.3% 4.3 42.9% 7
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17540
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
URB 2064: INTRODUCTION TO URBAN PLANNING
Response Rate: 23/23Primary Instructor: Bloom,Nicholas D.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 8.7% 91.3% 23
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 23
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 95.7% 5.0 4.3% 23
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 82.6% 4.3% 4.8 13.0% 23
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 52.2% 4.3% 8.7% 4.3 34.8% 23
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 78.3% 4.3% 4.7 17.4% 23
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 78.3% 4.8 21.7% 23
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.3% 52.2% 4.3% 13.0% 4.2 26.1% 23
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have enhanced my ability to effectively communicate including being able to give
oral presentations that increase knowledge, foster understanding, or encourage
change.
60.9% 4.3% 13.0% 13.0% 4.2 8.7% 23
Q28 I have enhanced by ability to read effectively, including being able to extract and to
create meaning from the written texts.
69.6% 4.3% 4.7 26.1% 23
Q29 I developed perspectives of the humanities and social sciences to bear within
technical discourse.
69.6% 4.7 30.4% 23
Q30 I have enhanced my ability to understand Urban History and Policy. 91.3% 4.9 8.7% 23
Q31 I developed an ability to work professionally in urban agencies. 69.6% 4.3% 8.7% 4.6 17.4% 23
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 78.3% 4.8 21.7% 23
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 91.3% 4.9 8.7% 23
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 91.3% 4.3% 4.9 4.3% 23
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 91.3% 4.9 8.7% 23
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: INT2
Class Number: 16970
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 9223: SELECTED TOPICS IN CS
Response Rate: 14/20Primary Instructor: Rodriguez,Juan C
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 14
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 14
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 7.1% 57.1% 4.4 35.7% 14
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 64.3% 4.6 35.7% 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 21.4% 28.6% 7.1% 21.4% 3.3 21.4% 14
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 28.6% 14.3% 35.7% 3.9 21.4% 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 35.7% 14.3% 4.2 50.0% 14
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 42.9% 7.1% 4.4 50.0% 14
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 35.7% 7.1% 14.3% 4.1 42.9% 14
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 50.0% 7.1% 4.4 42.9% 14
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
57.1% 14.3% 4.4 28.6% 14
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 42.9% 7.1% 7.1% 4.2 42.9% 14
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
14.3% 50.0% 7.1% 4.0 28.6% 14
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 57.1% 7.1% 4.5 35.7% 14
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 64.3% 7.1% 4.5 28.6% 14
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 50.0% 7.1% 28.6% 4.2 14.3% 14
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 35.7% 7.1% 35.7% 4.0 21.4% 14
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 35.7% 7.1% 35.7% 4.0 21.4% 14
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 7.1% 35.7% 7.1% 7.1% 4.1 42.9% 14
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 7.1% 50.0% 7.1% 14.3% 4.2 21.4% 14
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 42.9% 7.1% 7.1% 14.3% 4.2 28.6% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 7.1% 4.4 42.9% 14
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 28.6% 7.1% 7.1% 14.3% 4.0 42.9% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 7.1% 50.0% 7.1% 7.1% 7.1% 4.1 21.4% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16361
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6073: MARKETING
Response Rate: 40/41Primary Instructor: Cincotta,James A
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 40
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 40
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 2.5% 2.5% 4.7 15.0% 40
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 2.5% 60.0% 10.0% 7.5% 4.3 20.0% 40
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 72.5% 5.0% 2.5% 4.6 20.0% 40
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 75.0% 2.5% 2.5% 4.7 20.0% 40
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 62.5% 10.0% 2.5% 4.4 25.0% 40
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 72.5% 2.5% 7.5% 4.6 17.5% 40
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 60.0% 5.0% 5.0% 4.5 30.0% 40
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
2.5% 52.5% 2.5% 10.0% 4.3 32.5% 40
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
57.5% 2.5% 5.0% 4.5 35.0% 40
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
60.0% 2.5% 7.5% 4.5 30.0% 40
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 55.0% 2.5% 2.5% 7.5% 4.4 32.5% 40
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 2.5% 70.0% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 4.6 20.0% 40
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 2.5% 75.0% 5.0% 7.5% 4.5 10.0% 40
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 2.5% 72.5% 2.5% 5.0% 5.0% 4.5 12.5% 40
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: LVL1
Class Number: 16965
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6073: MARKETING
Response Rate: 13/14Primary Instructor: Cincotta,James A
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 13
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 13
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 7.7% 84.6% 4.6 7.7% 13
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 7.7% 46.2% 23.1% 7.7% 3.7 15.4% 13
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 7.7% 30.8% 15.4% 7.7% 3.7 38.5% 13
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 69.2% 15.4% 4.4 15.4% 13
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 7.7% 61.5% 7.7% 4.3 23.1% 13
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 7.7% 84.6% 7.7% 4.5 13
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 7.7% 69.2% 4.5 23.1% 13
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
7.7% 46.2% 4.2 46.2% 13
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
7.7% 53.8% 15.4% 4.2 23.1% 13
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
7.7% 53.8% 7.7% 4.2 30.8% 13
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 7.7% 61.5% 7.7% 7.7% 4.2 15.4% 13
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 7.7% 69.2% 7.7% 4.3 15.4% 13
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
7.7% 38.5% 15.4% 30.8% 3.5 7.7% 13
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 7.7% 46.2% 15.4% 7.7% 3.8 23.1% 13
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
7.7% 46.2% 23.1% 3.8 23.1% 13
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 7.7% 46.2% 7.7% 23.1% 3.8 15.4% 13
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 7.7% 61.5% 7.7% 4.4 23.1% 13
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 15.4% 38.5% 7.7% 23.1% 3.7 15.4% 13
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 7.7% 38.5% 7.7% 7.7% 23.1% 3.8 15.4% 13
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 23.1% 46.2% 3.8 30.8% 13
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 15.4% 53.8% 23.1% 3.8 7.7% 13
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 15.4% 46.2% 7.7% 30.8% 3.5 13
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 7.7% 30.8% 7.7% 3.9 53.8% 13
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: LVL1
Class Number: 16965
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6073: MARKETING
Response Rate: 13/14Primary Instructor: Cincotta,James A
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 7.7% 76.9% 4.5 15.4% 13
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 15.4% 69.2% 4.2 15.4% 13
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 7.7% 76.9% 7.7% 4.5 7.7% 13
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: MOT
Class Number: 16998
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6073: MARKETING
Response Rate: 35/37Primary Instructor: Cincotta,James A
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 35
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 35
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 88.6% 5.7% 4.8 5.7% 35
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 77.1% 5.7% 5.7% 4.6 11.4% 35
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 2.9% 85.7% 4.8 11.4% 35
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 2.9% 80.0% 2.9% 4.7 14.3% 35
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 2.9% 62.9% 2.9% 4.5 31.4% 35
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 2.9% 74.3% 4.7 22.9% 35
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 2.9% 65.7% 2.9% 8.6% 4.4 20.0% 35
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
2.9% 62.9% 2.9% 4.5 31.4% 35
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
2.9% 65.7% 5.7% 5.7% 4.4 20.0% 35
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
2.9% 68.6% 2.9% 4.5 25.7% 35
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 2.9% 62.9% 2.9% 8.6% 4.4 22.9% 35
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 2.9% 65.7% 5.7% 4.5 25.7% 35
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 2.9% 80.0% 2.9% 4.7 14.3% 35
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 2.9% 68.6% 2.9% 4.6 25.7% 35
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: BREC
Class Number: 17720
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 1213: MOTION AND SOUND
Response Rate: 20/26Primary Instructor: Raspopin,Alexander
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 68.4% 5.3% 5.3% 4.7 21.1% 19
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
15.8% 21.1% 5.3% 10.5% 5.3% 3.4 42.1% 19
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 10.5% 36.8% 5.3% 10.5% 3.9 36.8% 19
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 21.1% 26.3% 5.3% 5.3% 15.8% 3.3 26.3% 19
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: A1RC
Class Number: 17211
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2023: ELECTRICITY, MAGNETISM, & FLUIDS
Response Rate: 19/24Primary Instructor: Raspopin,Alexander
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 72.2% 11.1% 4.6 16.7% 18
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
44.4% 38.9% 4.1 16.7% 18
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 66.7% 5.6% 4.6 27.8% 18
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 61.1% 11.1% 4.5 27.8% 18
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: C3RC
Class Number: 17231
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2033: WAVES, OPTICS, & THERMODYNAMICS
Response Rate: 18/28Primary Instructor: Raspopin,Alexander
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 61.1% 4.6 38.9% 18
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
11.1% 50.0% 5.6% 16.7% 3.9 16.7% 18
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 5.6% 72.2% 5.6% 4.4 16.7% 18
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 11.1% 72.2% 11.1% 4.3 5.6% 18
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 17555
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2121: General Physics Laboratory I
Response Rate: 14/15Primary Instructor: Raspopin,Alexander
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
85.7% 7.1% 4.7 7.1% 14
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 71.4% 14.3% 7.1% 4.4 7.1% 14
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 14
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 35.7% 14.3% 14.3% 3.9 35.7% 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 14.3% 28.6% 7.1% 14.3% 14.3% 3.4 21.4% 14
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 35.7% 14.3% 35.7% 2.4 14.3% 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 28.6% 21.4% 4.1 50.0% 14
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 7.7% 38.5% 7.7% 15.4% 3.8 30.8% 13
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 21.4% 14.3% 14.3% 14.3% 3.1 35.7% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 35.7% 7.1% 28.6% 3.9 28.6% 14
Q40 Value was added to my education. 7.1% 21.4% 21.4% 3.8 50.0% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 7.1% 7.1% 7.1% 50.0% 3.2 28.6% 14
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A06 I have enhanced my ability to analyze and interpret data appropriately. 42.9% 4.4 57.1% 14
A17 I have enhanced my ability to conduct experiments to validate hypotheses and
theories.
28.6% 7.1% 4.2 64.3% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: D
Class Number: 17563
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2131: General Physics Laboratory II
Response Rate: 12/14Primary Instructor: Raspopin,Alexander
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
50.0% 4.5 50.0% 12
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 66.7% 8.3% 4.5 25.0% 12
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 58.3% 8.3% 8.3% 4.3 25.0% 12
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 8.3% 41.7% 16.7% 3.8 33.3% 12
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 41.7% 16.7% 16.7% 3.9 25.0% 12
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 8.3% 2.9 16.7% 12
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 8.3% 33.3% 16.7% 8.3% 3.7 33.3% 12
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 16.7% 4.3 33.3% 12
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 25.0% 3.8 41.7% 12
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 8.3% 33.3% 8.3% 16.7% 3.8 33.3% 12
Q40 Value was added to my education. 8.3% 41.7% 41.7% 3.8 8.3% 12
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 33.3% 16.7% 33.3% 2.8 16.7% 12
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A06 I have enhanced my ability to analyze and interpret data appropriately. 33.3% 8.3% 16.7% 4.0 41.7% 12
A17 I have enhanced my ability to conduct experiments to validate hypotheses and
theories.
33.3% 16.7% 16.7% 3.8 33.3% 12
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 5 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17538
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
URB 2024W: Design of Cities
Response Rate: 19/19Primary Instructor: Enigbokan,Olatokunbo Adeola
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 10.5% 89.5% 19
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.3% 94.7% 19
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 19
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 73.7% 5.3% 5.3% 4.6 15.8% 19
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 68.4% 10.5% 5.3% 4.4 15.8% 19
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 47.4% 5.3% 5.3% 4.4 42.1% 19
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 5.3% 63.2% 10.5% 4.4 21.1% 19
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 11.1% 61.1% 5.6% 4.2 22.2% 18
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have enhanced my ability to effectively communicate including being able to give
oral presentations that increase knowledge, foster understanding, or encourage
change.
82.4% 4.8 17.6% 17
Q28 I have enhanced by ability to read effectively, including being able to extract and to
create meaning from the written texts.
76.5% 4.8 23.5% 17
Q29 I developed perspectives of the humanities and social sciences to bear within
technical discourse.
82.4% 5.9% 4.8 11.8% 17
Q30 I have enhanced my ability to understand Urban History and Policy. 76.5% 4.8 23.5% 17
Q31 I have enhanced my ability to commuicate effectively (oral & writing). 82.4% 5.9% 5.9% 4.8 5.9% 17
Q32 I developed an ability to work professionally in urban agencies. 64.7% 17.6% 4.5 17.6% 17
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 31.6% 5.3% 10.5% 5.3% 4.1 47.4% 19
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 89.5% 5.3% 4.8 5.3% 19
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 78.9% 10.5% 4.6 10.5% 19
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 68.4% 10.5% 4.6 21.1% 19
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A20 I have enhanced my ability to acquire and process information from multiple
sources
76.5% 4.8 23.5% 17
A23 I have enhanced my ability to bring in outside experiences to provide solutions to
problems
58.8% 5.9% 4.5 35.3% 17
A26 I have enhanced my ability to plan and deliver oral presentations effectively 76.5% 4.8 23.5% 17
A28 I have enhanced my ability to use technology and graphics to present ideas and
decisions
76.5% 5.9% 5.9% 4.6 11.8% 17
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 82.4% 4.8 17.6% 17
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17539
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
URB 2044: METHODS FOR STUDYING URBAN ENVIRONMENTS
Response Rate: 10/11Primary Instructor: Enigbokan,Olatokunbo Adeola
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 30.0% 60.0% 10.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 20.0% 80.0% 10
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 10
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 70.0% 4.7 30.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 70.0% 4.7 30.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 70.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.7 10.0% 10
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have enhanced my ability to commuicate effectively (oral & writing). 80.0% 10.0% 4.7 10.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 20.0% 10.0% 4.0 20.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16923
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 7223: HYDROLOGY
Response Rate: 18/18Primary Instructor: Vasiliadis,Haralambos V.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 18
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 18
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 64.7% 4.6 35.3% 17
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 11.1% 33.3% 11.1% 5.6% 3.7 38.9% 18
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 5.6% 38.9% 16.7% 3.9 38.9% 18
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 55.6% 11.1% 5.6% 4.3 27.8% 18
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 5.6% 27.8% 16.7% 5.6% 3.7 44.4% 18
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 5.9% 70.6% 5.9% 4.5 17.6% 17
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I can understand the principles of ground water hydrology. 35.3% 5.9% 4.2 58.8% 17
Q28 I have developed the introduction to frequency analysis of floods and droughts. 41.2% 5.9% 5.9% 4.2 47.1% 17
Q29 I can understand analysis of precipitation, runoff, unit hydrographs, flood routing
and reservoir storage.
47.1% 11.8% 5.9% 4.2 35.3% 17
Q30 I can understand the concept of hydraulic cycle and meteorological considerations. 58.8% 5.9% 4.5 35.3% 17
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 11.1% 27.8% 5.6% 11.1% 3.7 44.4% 18
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 44.4% 11.1% 4.2 44.4% 18
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 38.9% 5.6% 22.2% 4.1 33.3% 18
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 5.6% 4.4 44.4% 18
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17199
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 3553: Non-Structural Building Systems
Response Rate: 24/33Primary Instructor: Tamayo,Fred
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 4.2% 95.8% 24
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 4.3% 91.3% 4.3% 23
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 25.0% 4.2% 12.5% 12.5% 3.9 45.8% 24
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 4.2% 16.7% 4.2% 20.8% 33.3% 3.3 20.8% 24
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 29.2% 4.2% 20.8% 12.5% 3.7 33.3% 24
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 4.2% 20.8% 4.2% 25.0% 8.3% 3.5 37.5% 24
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 16.7% 8.3% 33.3% 16.7% 2.8 25.0% 24
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.2% 33.3% 16.7% 4.0 45.8% 24
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I understand the basic principles of construction projects, interaction between
design consultants and construction team
17.4% 8.7% 8.7% 3.9 65.2% 23
Q28 I acquired a basic understanding of building HVAC, plumbing, fire protection,
electrical and specialty systems.
18.2% 9.1% 9.1% 3.9 63.6% 22
Q29 I understand how sustainable, energy efficient building systems are incorporated
into the building design
26.1% 8.7% 13.0% 4.0 52.2% 23
Q30 I learned how to read mechanical and electrical drawings and coordination 13.0% 26.1% 26.1% 3.3 34.8% 23
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 12.5% 16.7% 12.5% 12.5% 3.4 45.8% 24
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.2% 25.0% 8.3% 12.5% 3.8 50.0% 24
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 25.0% 8.3% 16.7% 16.7% 2.8 33.3% 24
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.2% 20.8% 33.3% 16.7% 3.3 25.0% 24
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16314
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 5463: Introduction to RF/Microwave Integrated Circuits
Response Rate: 37/60Primary Instructor: Kuo,Spencer Szu-Ping
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 37
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 37
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 78.4% 2.7% 2.7% 4.7 16.2% 37
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 2.7% 73.0% 5.4% 4.6 18.9% 37
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 2.7% 70.3% 5.4% 4.6 21.6% 37
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 2.7% 73.0% 10.8% 4.5 13.5% 37
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 2.7% 64.9% 8.1% 4.5 24.3% 37
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 2.7% 67.6% 5.4% 4.5 24.3% 37
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 70.3% 5.4% 13.5% 4.5 10.8% 37
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 2.7% 75.7% 2.7% 5.4% 4.6 13.5% 37
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 2.7% 73.0% 8.1% 4.6 16.2% 37
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 73.0% 2.7% 8.1% 4.6 16.2% 37
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16838
Dept. of Interdisciplinary Studies
BI 7643: COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS PERL & BIOPERL
Response Rate: 8/8Primary Instructor: Brathwaite,Mgavi Elombe
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 8
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 8
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 12.5% 25.0% 25.0% 3.4 37.5% 8
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 37.5% 12.5% 25.0% 2.5 25.0% 8
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 25.0% 4.0 25.0% 8
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 37.5% 25.0% 12.5% 3.8 25.0% 8
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 25.0% 37.5% 2.5 37.5% 8
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 12.5% 50.0% 2.6 37.5% 8
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 37.5% 12.5% 37.5% 2.3 12.5% 8
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 25.0% 12.5% 12.5% 3.9 50.0% 8
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
37.5% 25.0% 3.1 37.5% 8
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 37.5% 12.5% 37.5% 2.3 12.5% 8
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
37.5% 12.5% 25.0% 12.5% 2.4 12.5% 8
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 25.0% 12.5% 25.0% 12.5% 2.8 25.0% 8
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 25.0% 37.5% 2.5 37.5% 8
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 87.5% 3.1 12.5% 8
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 87.5% 3.1 12.5% 8
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 87.5% 3.1 12.5% 8
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 37.5% 12.5% 25.0% 3.9 25.0% 8
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 25.0% 12.5% 37.5% 3.6 25.0% 8
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 2.0 8
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 12.5% 25.0% 37.5% 3.1 25.0% 8
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 37.5% 12.5% 37.5% 12.5% 2.1 8
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 37.5% 12.5% 12.5% 25.0% 2.5 12.5% 8
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 23134
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 2193: Intro to Web Development
Response Rate: 14/18Primary Instructor: Sigal,Jason M
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 7.1% 92.9% 14
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 14.3% 71.4% 14.3% 14
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 14
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 92.3% 4.9 7.7% 13
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 28.6% 14.3% 4.1 57.1% 14
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 57.1% 14.3% 4.4 28.6% 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 71.4% 7.1% 4.6 21.4% 14
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 38.5% 7.7% 15.4% 7.7% 4.0 30.8% 13
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 28.6% 7.1% 7.1% 7.1% 4.1 50.0% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 78.6% 4.8 21.4% 14
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 64.3% 7.1% 7.1% 4.4 21.4% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 64.3% 7.1% 4.6 28.6% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 21624
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 3153: Media in Game Design and Development
Response Rate: 18/11Primary Instructor: Pizza,Toni
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 88.9% 11.1% 18
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 11.1% 77.8% 11.1% 18
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 55.6% 4.6 44.4% 18
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 18
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 44.4% 22.2% 11.1% 3.9 22.2% 18
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 18
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 55.6% 4.6 44.4% 18
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 64.7% 35.3% 4.3 17
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 18
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 55.6% 4.6 44.4% 18
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 18
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 18
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: EMOT
Class Number: 16661
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6933: Information Technologies, Systems and Management in Organizations
Response Rate: 8/8Primary Instructor: Kauber,Frederick
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 8
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 7
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 8
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 8
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 62.5% 4.6 37.5% 8
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 8
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 8
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
62.5% 4.6 37.5% 8
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 8
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 8
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 8
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 8
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 24016
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BE 6353: Special Topics in Biomedical Engineering
Response Rate: 10/12Primary Instructor: Carter,John Neil
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 10.0% 80.0% 10.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 10
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 80.0% 20.0% 4.6 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 30.0% 4.3 70.0% 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 70.0% 4.7 30.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 70.0% 10.0% 4.5 20.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 10.0% 10.0% 20.0% 4.1 10.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 40.0% 10.0% 4.2 50.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 80.0% 10.0% 4.7 10.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: B1LB
Class Number: 17314
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 1004: General Chemistry for Engineers
Response Rate: 14/17Primary Instructor: Aber,Janice E.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
100.0% 5.0 14
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 78.6% 7.1% 4.6 14.3% 14
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 14
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 64.3% 7.1% 14.3% 4.4 14.3% 14
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 78.6% 7.1% 7.1% 4.6 7.1% 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 64.3% 4.6 35.7% 14
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 71.4% 7.1% 4.6 21.4% 14
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 In this course we gained a basic background in general chemistry. 61.5% 4.6 38.5% 13
Q28 In this course we obtained a basic understanding of atomic and molecular structure
and their relationship to the properties of materials.
53.8% 4.5 46.2% 13
Q29 In this course we obtained hands-on laboratory experience with experimental
techniques, chemical principles and materials.
61.5% 4.6 38.5% 13
Q30 We found the electronic homework assignments to be a useful tool in learning
chemistry.
38.5% 7.7% 38.5% 3.8 15.4% 13
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 14.3% 14.3% 4.1 21.4% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 14
Q40 Value was added to my education. 57.1% 14.3% 7.1% 4.2 21.4% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 14.3% 4.4 35.7% 14
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 30.8% 15.4% 15.4% 3.8 38.5% 13
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
53.8% 15.4% 7.7% 4.2 23.1% 13
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 38.5% 15.4% 30.8% 3.8 15.4% 13
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: B1RC
Class Number: 17315
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 1004: General Chemistry for Engineers
Response Rate: 8/17Primary Instructor: Aber,Janice E.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 8
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 8
A3. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 8
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 87.5% 12.5% 4.8 8
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 62.5% 4.6 37.5% 8
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 62.5% 12.5% 4.5 25.0% 8
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 In this course we gained a basic background in general chemistry. 50.0% 12.5% 4.4 37.5% 8
Q28 In this course we obtained a basic understanding of atomic and molecular structure
and their relationship to the properties of materials.
62.5% 12.5% 4.5 25.0% 8
Q29 In this course we obtained hands-on laboratory experience with experimental
techniques, chemical principles and materials.
75.0% 12.5% 4.6 12.5% 8
Q30 We found the electronic homework assignments to be a useful tool in learning
chemistry.
37.5% 50.0% 3.9 12.5% 8
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 12.5% 4.4 37.5% 8
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 62.5% 12.5% 4.4 25.0% 8
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 62.5% 12.5% 4.5 25.0% 8
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 50.0% 12.5% 4.3 37.5% 8
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
62.5% 12.5% 4.4 25.0% 8
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 50.0% 12.5% 25.0% 4.0 12.5% 8
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
87.5% 12.5% 4.8 8
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 75.0% 12.5% 4.6 12.5% 8
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: ALEC
Class Number: 17321
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 1024: General Chemistry II
Response Rate: 10/51Primary Instructor: Aber,Janice E.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 10
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 10
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 80.0% 10.0% 4.7 10.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 60.0% 10.0% 4.4 30.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 60.0% 10.0% 4.4 30.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 17329
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 2614: Physical Chemistry I
Response Rate: 21/32Primary Instructor: Aber,Janice E.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 21
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 21
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 21
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 90.5% 4.9 9.5% 21
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 95.2% 5.0 4.8% 21
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 95.2% 5.0 4.8% 21
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 81.0% 4.8 19.0% 21
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 4.8% 4.8% 4.5 23.8% 21
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 61.9% 14.3% 4.8% 4.3 19.0% 21
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 21
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 85.7% 4.8% 4.8 9.5% 21
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 71.4% 9.5% 4.8% 4.5 14.3% 21
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 76.2% 4.8% 4.7 19.0% 21
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 22261
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
STS 2444: HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF INTERNET TECHNOLOGY
Response Rate: 16/19Primary Instructor: Leslie,Christopher
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 15
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 86.7% 6.7% 4.7 6.7% 15
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 86.7% 13.3% 4.6 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 53.3% 13.3% 6.7% 4.2 26.7% 15
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 6.7% 66.7% 6.7% 6.7% 4.3 13.3% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 6.7% 73.3% 6.7% 4.4 13.3% 15
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 6.7% 53.3% 13.3% 4.2 26.7% 15
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 This course provided me with an understanding of the interactions among science,
technology, and society.
60.0% 6.7% 4.5 33.3% 15
Q28 This course introduced me to major topics in the history of technology in the
twentieth century.
80.0% 4.8 20.0% 15
Q29 This course included a representative range of topics from the history of the
Internet, from its origins in communication networks to the present day.
80.0% 6.7% 4.7 13.3% 15
Q30 This course gave me an international perspective on the history of the Internet. 53.3% 6.7% 4.4 40.0% 15
Q31 This course contained topics and authors that I'd like to learn more about on my
own.
6.7% 40.0% 13.3% 6.7% 3.9 33.3% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 40.0% 13.3% 6.7% 4.1 40.0% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 6.7% 46.7% 6.7% 4.1 40.0% 15
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 6.7% 73.3% 6.7% 4.4 13.3% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 53.3% 13.3% 6.7% 4.2 26.7% 15
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A21 I have enhanced my ability to learn independently. 33.3% 13.3% 13.3% 3.9 40.0% 15
A38 I have enhanced my ability to develop an understanding of professional and ethical
responsibility
46.7% 6.7% 6.7% 4.3 40.0% 15
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 26.7% 6.7% 26.7% 3.9 40.0% 15
A40 I have enhanced my ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
global and societal context
53.3% 6.7% 4.6 40.0% 15
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 40.0% 13.3% 6.7% 4.1 40.0% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17518
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
STS 3004W: SEMINAR IN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY STUDIES
Response Rate: 19/19Primary Instructor: Leslie,Christopher
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 19
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 19
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 94.7% 4.9 5.3% 19
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 89.5% 4.9 10.5% 19
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 78.9% 4.8 21.1% 19
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 5.3% 84.2% 4.7 10.5% 19
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 84.2% 4.8 15.8% 19
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 68.4% 5.3% 4.6 26.3% 19
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 This course provided me with an understanding of the interactions among science,
technology, and society.
84.2% 4.8 15.8% 19
Q28 This course introduced me to major topics in the history of science and technology
from a range of historical periods and genres.
5.3% 68.4% 4.5 26.3% 19
Q29 This course demonstrated different approaches to the field of STS and challenged
my preconceptions about what STS could be and is.
84.2% 4.8 15.8% 19
Q30 The writing component of this course was more challenging than introductory
writing courses.
78.9% 4.8 21.1% 19
Q31 This course contained topics and authors that I'd like to learn more about on my
own.
10.5% 63.2% 5.3% 5.3% 4.2 15.8% 19
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 36.8% 21.1% 4.2 42.1% 19
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 68.4% 4.7 31.6% 19
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 5.3% 78.9% 5.3% 4.6 10.5% 19
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A21 I have enhanced my ability to learn independently. 63.2% 5.3% 5.3% 4.5 26.3% 19
A38 I have enhanced my ability to develop an understanding of professional and ethical
responsibility
52.6% 5.3% 5.3% 4.4 36.8% 19
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 52.6% 5.3% 10.5% 4.3 31.6% 19
A40 I have enhanced my ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
global and societal context
78.9% 4.8 21.1% 19
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 78.9% 5.3% 4.7 15.8% 19
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17031
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 3304: Introduction to Supply Chain Management
Response Rate: 6/9Primary Instructor: Greenstein,Michael
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 6
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 83.3% 16.7% 4.7 6
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 6
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
66.7% 16.7% 4.5 16.7% 6
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 6
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16206
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6463: Supply Chain Management
Response Rate: 14/23Primary Instructor: Greenstein,Michael
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 14
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 13
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 14
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 14
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 64.3% 7.1% 7.1% 4.4 21.4% 14
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 42.9% 7.1% 4.4 50.0% 14
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 57.1% 7.1% 14.3% 4.3 21.4% 14
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
71.4% 21.4% 4.5 7.1% 14
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
57.1% 7.1% 4.5 35.7% 14
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
57.1% 7.1% 4.5 35.7% 14
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 64.3% 4.6 35.7% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 7.1% 7.1% 4.3 35.7% 14
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 78.6% 4.8 21.4% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 7.1% 50.0% 7.1% 4.2 35.7% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A1LB
Class Number: 17684
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BMS 1004: Introduction to Cell and Molecular Biology
Response Rate: 16/16Primary Instructor: Paratore,Anthony W
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
75.0% 6.3% 4.6 18.8% 16
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 6.3% 50.0% 6.3% 6.3% 4.1 31.3% 16
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 62.5% 6.3% 4.6 31.3% 16
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 68.8% 12.5% 6.3% 4.4 12.5% 16
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 12.5% 31.3% 31.3% 6.3% 3.3 18.8% 16
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 6.3% 6.3% 25.0% 18.8% 3.2 43.8% 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 6.3% 37.5% 6.3% 12.5% 3.9 37.5% 16
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 6.3% 43.8% 6.3% 25.0% 3.9 18.8% 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 12.5% 37.5% 31.3% 12.5% 3.3 6.3% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 56.3% 6.3% 18.8% 4.3 18.8% 16
Q40 Value was added to my education. 12.5% 43.8% 6.3% 18.8% 3.8 18.8% 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 6.3% 37.5% 25.0% 6.3% 3.6 25.0% 16
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 56.3% 6.3% 18.8% 4.3 18.8% 16
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
6.3% 43.8% 31.3% 3.9 18.8% 16
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 6.3% 50.0% 31.3% 4.0 12.5% 16
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: B1LB
Class Number: 17689
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BMS 1004: Introduction to Cell and Molecular Biology
Response Rate: 12/13Primary Instructor: Paratore,Anthony W
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
8.3% 75.0% 8.3% 4.5 8.3% 12
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 8.3% 50.0% 8.3% 4.3 33.3% 12
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 8.3% 83.3% 8.3% 4.6 12
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 8.3% 83.3% 8.3% 4.6 12
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 8.3% 50.0% 8.3% 8.3% 4.1 25.0% 12
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 8.3% 58.3% 8.3% 4.4 25.0% 12
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 8.3% 66.7% 8.3% 4.3 16.7% 12
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 8.3% 58.3% 8.3% 4.3 25.0% 12
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 8.3% 50.0% 8.3% 4.1 33.3% 12
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 8.3% 83.3% 4.6 8.3% 12
Q40 Value was added to my education. 8.3% 83.3% 4.6 8.3% 12
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 16.7% 66.7% 8.3% 4.1 8.3% 12
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 8.3% 50.0% 8.3% 4.2 33.3% 12
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
8.3% 58.3% 4.3 33.3% 12
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 8.3% 50.0% 4.3 41.7% 12
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: A1LB
Class Number: 17680
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BMS 2004: Introduction to Physiology
Response Rate: 13/13Primary Instructor: Paratore,Anthony W
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
76.9% 7.7% 4.8 15.4% 13
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 53.8% 7.7% 15.4% 4.3 23.1% 13
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 84.6% 7.7% 4.9 7.7% 13
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 84.6% 7.7% 4.9 7.7% 13
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 53.8% 7.7% 30.8% 7.7% 3.8 13
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 7.7% 46.2% 7.7% 15.4% 15.4% 3.8 7.7% 13
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 53.8% 7.7% 23.1% 4.3 15.4% 13
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 38.5% 7.7% 7.7% 4.3 46.2% 13
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 46.2% 7.7% 15.4% 4.3 30.8% 13
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 84.6% 7.7% 4.9 7.7% 13
Q40 Value was added to my education. 61.5% 7.7% 15.4% 4.5 15.4% 13
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 7.7% 46.2% 7.7% 15.4% 15.4% 3.8 7.7% 13
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 30.8% 7.7% 7.7% 23.1% 3.9 30.8% 13
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
38.5% 15.4% 7.7% 15.4% 4.1 23.1% 13
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 38.5% 7.7% 7.7% 38.5% 3.8 7.7% 13
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: A2LB
Class Number: 17681
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BMS 2004: Introduction to Physiology
Response Rate: 6/8Primary Instructor: Paratore,Anthony W
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 66.7% 33.3% 4.3 6
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 66.7% 16.7% 4.5 16.7% 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
Q40 Value was added to my education. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 16.7% 4.2 33.3% 6
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: A3LB
Class Number: 22149
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BMS 2004: Introduction to Physiology
Response Rate: 13/15Primary Instructor: Paratore,Anthony W
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
84.6% 4.8 15.4% 13
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 92.3% 4.9 7.7% 13
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 84.6% 7.7% 4.8 7.7% 13
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 84.6% 4.8 15.4% 13
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 53.8% 7.7% 15.4% 4.3 23.1% 13
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 61.5% 7.7% 4.5 30.8% 13
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 61.5% 7.7% 4.5 30.8% 13
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 46.2% 7.7% 4.4 46.2% 13
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 53.8% 15.4% 7.7% 4.2 23.1% 13
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 69.2% 15.4% 4.5 15.4% 13
Q40 Value was added to my education. 69.2% 7.7% 4.6 23.1% 13
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 53.8% 7.7% 7.7% 4.3 30.8% 13
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 63.6% 9.1% 4.5 27.3% 11
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
54.5% 9.1% 4.5 36.4% 11
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 54.5% 18.2% 4.4 27.3% 11
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 5 of 5
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 22173
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 9433: Protein Engineering
Response Rate: 15/16Primary Instructor: Montclare,Jin Kim
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 15
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 46.7% 6.7% 6.7% 4.3 40.0% 15
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 26.7% 20.0% 4.1 53.3% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 15
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 6.7% 40.0% 20.0% 4.0 33.3% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 13.3% 6.7% 20.0% 33.3% 2.9 26.7% 15
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 6.7% 20.0% 33.3% 6.7% 3.3 33.3% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 20.0% 13.3% 6.7% 33.3% 13.3% 2.6 13.3% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 6.7% 26.7% 13.3% 3.8 53.3% 15
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 13.3% 6.7% 20.0% 3.5 60.0% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 13.3% 20.0% 26.7% 3.5 40.0% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: O2LB
Class Number: 16307
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 5373: INTERNET ARCHITECTURE & PROTOCOLS
Response Rate: 4/4Primary Instructor: Liu,Yong
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 100.0% 5.0 3
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 4
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 25.0% 4.3 75.0% 4
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 25.0% 4.3 75.0% 4
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 75.0% 25.0% 4.5 4
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 25.0% 25.0% 4.0 50.0% 4
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
25.0% 4.3 75.0% 4
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 25.0% 25.0% 4.0 50.0% 4
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 50.0% 25.0% 4.3 25.0% 4
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 25.0% 25.0% 4.0 50.0% 4
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 25.0% 25.0% 4.0 50.0% 4
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 25.0% 25.0% 4.0 50.0% 4
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 50.0% 25.0% 4.0 25.0% 4
Q40 Value was added to my education. 25.0% 25.0% 3.8 50.0% 4
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 25.0% 4.0 25.0% 4
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16309
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 5373: INTERNET ARCHITECTURE & PROTOCOLS
Response Rate: 6/8Primary Instructor: Liu,Yong
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 16.7% 83.3% 6
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 16.7% 4.3 33.3% 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 6
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 6
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 16.7% 16.7% 4.0 16.7% 6
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 6
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 33.3% 16.7% 16.7% 3.8 33.3% 6
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
33.3% 16.7% 4.2 50.0% 6
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 33.3% 16.7% 4.0 50.0% 6
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
33.3% 16.7% 4.0 50.0% 6
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 16.7% 16.7% 33.3% 3.5 33.3% 6
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 6
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 16.7% 50.0% 3.7 33.3% 6
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 16.7% 33.3% 3.8 50.0% 6
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 16.7% 33.3% 3.8 50.0% 6
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 33.3% 33.3% 4.0 33.3% 6
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 83.3% 3.2 16.7% 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 16.7% 4.0 50.0% 6
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 6
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 50.0% 16.7% 4.3 33.3% 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: O1LB
Class Number: 23139
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 5373: INTERNET ARCHITECTURE & PROTOCOLS
Response Rate: 2/4Primary Instructor: Liu,Yong
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 2
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 2
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 100.0% 5.0 2
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 50.0% 3.0 50.0% 2
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
50.0% 50.0% 3.5 2
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
100.0% 5.0 2
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 100.0% 3.0 2
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 100.0% 3.0 2
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 100.0% 3.0 2
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 4.0 100.0% 2
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 4.0 100.0% 2
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 50.0% 3.5 2
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 2
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 22449
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 9333: SEL TPCS IN TELECOMM & NTWK FROM INFO SYS
Response Rate: 57/97Primary Instructor: Liu,Yong
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 57
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 57
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 91.2% 1.8% 4.9 7.0% 57
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 87.7% 1.8% 4.9 10.5% 57
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 17.5% 43.9% 1.8% 21.1% 3.7 15.8% 57
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 1.8% 61.4% 1.8% 15.8% 4.4 19.3% 57
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 75.4% 1.8% 4.7 22.8% 57
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 3.6% 72.7% 1.8% 1.8% 4.6 20.0% 55
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 71.9% 1.8% 4.7 26.3% 57
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 1.8% 78.9% 4.7 19.3% 57
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 86.0% 1.8% 4.8 12.3% 57
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 1.8% 84.2% 1.8% 4.8 12.3% 57
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16207
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6503: MANAGEMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Response Rate: 24/26Primary Instructor: Buttigieg,William J
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 95.7% 4.3% 23
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 95.8% 4.2% 24
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 62.5% 4.2% 4.2% 4.2% 4.5 25.0% 24
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 70.8% 4.2% 4.2% 4.7 20.8% 24
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 75.0% 4.2% 4.8 20.8% 24
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 70.8% 4.2% 4.7 25.0% 24
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 41.7% 8.3% 16.7% 8.3% 4.0 25.0% 24
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 58.3% 4.2% 4.6 37.5% 24
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 45.8% 4.2% 8.3% 4.2% 4.3 37.5% 24
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
4.2% 50.0% 4.2% 8.3% 4.2% 4.2 29.2% 24
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
41.7% 4.2% 8.3% 4.3 45.8% 24
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
58.3% 4.2% 4.6 37.5% 24
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.2% 50.0% 4.2% 16.7% 4.2 25.0% 24
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.2% 54.2% 4.2% 4.2% 4.4 33.3% 24
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 8.3% 54.2% 4.2% 4.2% 4.2% 4.2 25.0% 24
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 8.3% 54.2% 4.2% 4.2% 4.2% 4.2 25.0% 24
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17124
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 3233: Machine Design
Response Rate: 30/38Primary Instructor: Nourbakhsh,Said
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 6.7% 90.0% 3.3% 30
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 96.7% 3.3% 30
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 63.3% 10.0% 4.5 26.7% 30
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 6.7% 60.0% 16.7% 4.2 16.7% 30
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 60.0% 6.7% 4.5 33.3% 30
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 6.7% 16.7% 4.2 26.7% 30
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 3.3% 33.3% 23.3% 6.7% 3.7 33.3% 30
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 10.0% 40.0% 3.3% 16.7% 3.9 30.0% 30
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learned the concepts on stress, strain, elastic and plastic ranges of material
behavior, stress-strain relationship, and engineering materials
50.0% 10.0% 4.4 40.0% 30
Q28 Learned static failure theories for ductile and brittle materials 50.0% 3.3% 13.3% 4.4 33.3% 30
Q29 Learned about application of static and dynamics failure theories to mechanical
design problems
43.3% 3.3% 6.7% 4.4 46.7% 30
Q30 Learned about the fundamentals of machine elements, such as columns, shafts,
gears, and bearings
50.0% 6.7% 3.3% 4.5 40.0% 30
Q31 Learned how to design mechanical systems based on a set of requirements 3.4% 37.9% 3.4% 3.4% 6.9% 4.1 44.8% 29
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 3.3% 23.3% 4.0 40.0% 30
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.3% 50.0% 3.3% 3.3% 16.7% 4.2 23.3% 30
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 6.7% 40.0% 13.3% 13.3% 3.8 26.7% 30
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 43.3% 6.7% 3.3% 16.7% 4.2 30.0% 30
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 56.7% 3.3% 3.3% 13.3% 4.4 23.3% 30
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
3.3% 50.0% 3.3% 3.3% 13.3% 4.2 26.7% 30
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 50.0% 3.3% 13.3% 4.3 33.3% 30
A48 I have enhanced my ability to apply principles of engineering, basic science, and
mathematics (including multivariate calculus and differential equations) to model,
analyze, design, and realize physical systems, components or processes
36.7% 3.3% 3.3% 13.3% 4.2 43.3% 30
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 22344
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 4863: CORROSION & NON-DESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION OF MATERIALS
Response Rate: 16/18Primary Instructor: Nourbakhsh,Said
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 16
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 16
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 93.8% 4.9 6.3% 16
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 16
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 81.3% 4.8 18.8% 16
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 93.8% 4.9 6.3% 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 81.3% 4.8 18.8% 16
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 81.3% 6.3% 4.9 12.5% 16
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learn how corrosion occurs in metals and alloys 100.0% 5.0 15
Q28 Learn the various forms of corrosion 86.7% 4.9 13.3% 15
Q29 Learn how to prevent corrosion 86.7% 4.9 13.3% 15
Q30 Learn the methods used to inspect structures non-destructively 93.3% 4.9 6.7% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 16
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 16
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 86.7% 4.9 13.3% 15
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
86.7% 4.9 13.3% 15
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 86.7% 4.9 13.3% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16988
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 9173: SEL TOPCS IN SIGNAL PROCESSING
Response Rate: 9/11Primary Instructor: Bello,Juan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 9
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 9
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 9
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 22.2% 4.4 11.1% 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 44.4% 22.2% 4.2 33.3% 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 66.7% 11.1% 4.6 22.2% 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16920
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 6073: Instrumentation, Monitoring and Condition Assessment of Civil Infrastructure
Response Rate: 17/23Primary Instructor: Iskander,Magued G
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 17
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 17
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 82.4% 4.8 17.6% 17
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 58.8% 17.6% 4.4 23.5% 17
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 17.6% 29.4% 23.5% 17.6% 3.1 11.8% 17
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 58.8% 11.8% 4.5 29.4% 17
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 47.1% 11.8% 4.4 41.2% 17
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 41.2% 5.9% 4.4 52.9% 17
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 5.9% 47.1% 5.9% 4.3 41.2% 17
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 58.8% 5.9% 4.5 35.3% 17
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 64.7% 11.8% 4.5 23.5% 17
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 47.1% 23.5% 4.2 29.4% 17
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 23128
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 9781: Selected Topics in Management
Response Rate: 2/5Primary Instructor: Coleman,Vaughan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 2
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 2
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 2
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 2
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 50.0% 3.5 2
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 2
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 2
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 100.0% 5.0 2
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
100.0% 5.0 2
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
100.0% 5.0 2
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
50.0% 50.0% 3.0 2
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 100.0% 5.0 2
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 100.0% 5.0 2
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 100.0% 5.0 2
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 100.0% 5.0 2
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 100.0% 5.0 2
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 100.0% 5.0 2
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 100.0% 5.0 2
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 2
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 23128
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 9781: Selected Topics in Management
Response Rate: 2/5Primary Instructor: Coleman,Vaughan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 2
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 2
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 2
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: LAB
Class Number: 16817
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BT 6073: Genetic Engineering
Response Rate: 19/20Primary Instructor: Katsigeorgis,John M
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
73.7% 4.7 26.3% 19
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 63.2% 10.5% 4.5 26.3% 19
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 73.7% 5.3% 5.3% 4.6 15.8% 19
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 73.7% 5.3% 4.6 21.1% 19
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 66.7% 11.1% 4.4 22.2% 18
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 5.3% 10.5% 21.1% 15.8% 3.4 47.4% 19
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 5.3% 47.4% 26.3% 3.8 21.1% 19
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 52.6% 10.5% 10.5% 4.2 26.3% 19
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 10.5% 36.8% 5.3% 15.8% 10.5% 3.6 21.1% 19
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 5.6% 66.7% 5.6% 4.4 22.2% 18
Q40 Value was added to my education. 10.5% 57.9% 5.3% 5.3% 4.2 21.1% 19
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 10.5% 63.2% 5.3% 5.3% 4.2 15.8% 19
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 16818
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BT 6073: Genetic Engineering
Response Rate: 19/20Primary Instructor: Katsigeorgis,John M
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 19
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 18
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 84.2% 4.8 15.8% 19
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 78.9% 4.8 21.1% 19
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 21.1% 31.6% 10.5% 3.5 36.8% 19
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 73.7% 5.3% 4.7 21.1% 19
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 68.4% 5.3% 5.3% 4.5 21.1% 19
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 52.6% 21.1% 4.3 26.3% 19
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 52.6% 10.5% 4.4 36.8% 19
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 73.7% 15.8% 4.6 10.5% 19
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 78.9% 10.5% 4.6 10.5% 19
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 63.2% 5.3% 10.5% 4.4 21.1% 19
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Class Number: 2033A-DiBartolo,Salvatore J
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2033: WAVES, OPTICS, & THERMODYNAMICS
Response Rate: 53/68Primary Instructor: DiBartolo,Salvatore J
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 96.2% 3.8% 53
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 98.0% 2.0% 50
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 75.5% 3.8% 4.7 20.8% 53
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 59.6% 7.7% 11.5% 4.5 21.2% 52
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 1.9% 73.6% 1.9% 7.5% 4.6 15.1% 53
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 3.9% 64.7% 5.9% 3.9% 4.4 21.6% 51
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 5.8% 53.8% 5.8% 4.3 34.6% 52
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 53.8% 1.9% 15.4% 4.3 28.8% 52
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 1.9% 49.1% 7.5% 5.7% 4.2 35.8% 53
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.9% 5.7% 9.4% 4.3 34.0% 53
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 1.9% 73.1% 1.9% 1.9% 5.8% 4.6 15.4% 52
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 5.7% 52.8% 1.9% 1.9% 13.2% 4.2 24.5% 53
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 21650
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 6683: QUANTUM MECHANCIS II
Response Rate: 9/9Primary Instructor: DiBartolo,Salvatore J
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 88.9% 11.1% 9
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 88.9% 11.1% 9
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 77.8% 11.1% 11.1% 4.4 9
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 77.8% 22.2% 4.3 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 55.6% 11.1% 4.3 33.3% 9
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 66.7% 22.2% 4.4 11.1% 9
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 55.6% 11.1% 4.4 33.3% 9
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 11.1% 55.6% 4.2 33.3% 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 55.6% 11.1% 4.4 33.3% 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 77.8% 11.1% 11.1% 4.4 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 66.7% 11.1% 11.1% 4.3 11.1% 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: K
Class Number: 17042
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 1124: Calculus II for Engineers
Response Rate: 3/23Primary Instructor: Bronstein,Irina
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 3
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 3
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 33.3% 33.3% 3.7 33.3% 3
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 33.3% 33.3% 4.0 33.3% 3
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
33.3% 66.7% 3.7 3
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 100.0% 3.0 3
Q29 I need more HW problems. 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 2.0 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 33.3% 3.7 33.3% 3
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 33.3% 33.3% 3.7 33.3% 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 33.3% 33.3% 4.0 33.3% 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 17045
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 1324: Integrated Calculus I for Engineers
Response Rate: 2/22Primary Instructor: Bronstein,Irina
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 2
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 2
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 2
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
50.0% 3.0 50.0% 2
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 50.0% 3.0 50.0% 2
Q29 I need more HW problems. 50.0% 50.0% 1.5 2
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 2
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 50.0% 50.0% 3.5 2
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 2
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 17048
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 1424: Integrated Calculus II for Engineers
Response Rate: 1/25Primary Instructor: Cereste,Ken
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 1
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 1
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 1
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 2.0 1
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 1
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
4.0 100.0% 1
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 100.0% 3.0 1
Q29 I need more HW problems. 100.0% 1.0 1
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 2.0 1
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.0 100.0% 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: K
Class Number: 17049
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 1424: Integrated Calculus II for Engineers
Response Rate: 1/25Primary Instructor: Cereste,Ken
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 1
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 1
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 4.0 100.0% 1
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 2.0 1
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 1.0 1
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.0 100.0% 1
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
100.0% 3.0 1
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 100.0% 2.0 1
Q29 I need more HW problems. 100.0% 1.0 1
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.0 100.0% 1
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 1.0 1
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.0 100.0% 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 16723
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6023: Economic Foundations in Finance
Response Rate: 8/9Primary Instructor: Blecherman,Barry S
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 8
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 8
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 87.5% 12.5% 4.6 8
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 87.5% 12.5% 4.6 8
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 87.5% 12.5% 4.6 8
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 87.5% 12.5% 4.6 8
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 12.5% 75.0% 4.4 12.5% 8
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 62.5% 25.0% 4.1 12.5% 8
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 75.0% 12.5% 12.5% 4.4 8
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 75.0% 12.5% 4.5 12.5% 8
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 12.5% 87.5% 4.5 8
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 12.5% 75.0% 4.4 12.5% 8
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17332
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2813: Astronomy and Astrophysics
Response Rate: 20/28Primary Instructor: Folan,Lorcan Michael
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 20
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 20
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 95.0% 5.0 5.0% 20
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 55.0% 20.0% 4.3 25.0% 20
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 75.0% 5.0% 4.7 20.0% 20
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 5.0% 50.0% 5.0% 5.0% 4.2 35.0% 20
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 10.0% 5.0% 4.3 35.0% 20
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 25.0% 10.0% 45.0% 3.8 20.0% 20
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 35.0% 5.0% 4.3 60.0% 20
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 55.0% 5.0% 4.5 40.0% 20
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 60.0% 5.0% 4.6 35.0% 20
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 55.0% 5.0% 5.0% 4.5 35.0% 20
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17695
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 4613: Artificial Intelligence
Response Rate: 48/53Primary Instructor: Wong,Edward Kin-ming
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 48
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 2.1% 97.9% 48
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 75.0% 2.1% 2.1% 4.7 20.8% 48
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 72.9% 2.1% 2.1% 10.4% 4.6 12.5% 48
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 70.8% 4.2% 2.1% 4.6 22.9% 48
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 72.9% 2.1% 2.1% 14.6% 4.6 8.3% 48
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 54.2% 10.4% 2.1% 4.3 33.3% 48
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 2.1% 62.5% 6.3% 6.3% 4.4 22.9% 48
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I am comfortable using network tools such as Wireshark to measure and monitor
network performance
33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 3.3 3
Q28 I am comfortable with describing Internet protocol structure including the
application layer, transport layer, network layer and link layers.
33.3% 33.3% 3.7 33.3% 3
Q29 I am comfortable with the configuration and operation of the network layer
including forwarding, router architecture, the IP protocol and routing protocols
including OSPF and BGP.
33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 3.3 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.2% 56.3% 8.3% 10.4% 4.2 20.8% 48
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 2.1% 62.5% 10.4% 2.1% 4.3 22.9% 48
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 4.2% 62.5% 6.3% 4.2% 4.3 22.9% 48
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.2% 64.6% 6.3% 10.4% 4.3 14.6% 48
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16243
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6613: Artificial Intelligence I
Response Rate: 48/53Primary Instructor: Wong,Edward Kin-ming
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 48
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 2.1% 97.9% 48
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 75.0% 2.1% 2.1% 4.7 20.8% 48
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 72.9% 2.1% 2.1% 10.4% 4.6 12.5% 48
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 70.8% 4.2% 2.1% 4.6 22.9% 48
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 72.9% 2.1% 2.1% 14.6% 4.6 8.3% 48
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 54.2% 10.4% 2.1% 4.3 33.3% 48
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 2.1% 62.5% 6.3% 6.3% 4.4 22.9% 48
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I am comfortable using network tools such as Wireshark to measure and monitor
network performance
33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 3.3 3
Q28 I am comfortable with describing Internet protocol structure including the
application layer, transport layer, network layer and link layers.
33.3% 33.3% 3.7 33.3% 3
Q29 I am comfortable with the configuration and operation of the network layer
including forwarding, router architecture, the IP protocol and routing protocols
including OSPF and BGP.
33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 3.3 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.2% 56.3% 8.3% 10.4% 4.2 20.8% 48
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 2.1% 62.5% 10.4% 2.1% 4.3 22.9% 48
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 4.2% 62.5% 6.3% 4.2% 4.3 22.9% 48
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.2% 64.6% 6.3% 10.4% 4.3 14.6% 48
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17095
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 3223: Environmental Engineering I
Response Rate: 15/17Primary Instructor: Ahmed,Mahmoud Abdelrahim
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 6.7% 93.3% 15
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 66.7% 6.7% 6.7% 4.5 20.0% 15
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 6.7% 33.3% 6.7% 33.3% 3.7 20.0% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 13.3% 26.7% 26.7% 13.3% 3.2 20.0% 15
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 6.7% 60.0% 6.7% 6.7% 4.2 20.0% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 40.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.8 20.0% 15
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 33.3% 20.0% 13.3% 3.8 33.3% 15
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Understand the impact to our health and well-being caused by environmental
issues, such as water pollution, air pollution, and solid waste
60.0% 6.7% 4.5 33.3% 15
Q28 Identify, formulate, and solve environmental problems by applying scientific and
engineering methods, such as risk assessment, solid waste management.
60.0% 6.7% 13.3% 4.3 20.0% 15
Q29 Gain an understanding of the interrelationships of different areas (climate
change/carbon Emission, energy production/use, water quality) affecting the
environment.
53.3% 6.7% 13.3% 4.3 26.7% 15
Q30 Conduct experiments (i.e. water quality analysis including conductivity, turbidity,
pH, alkalinity, hardness), as well as analyze and interpret data.
60.0% 13.3% 4.5 26.7% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 20.0% 4.1 46.7% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 46.7% 6.7% 6.7% 4.3 40.0% 15
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 13.3% 46.7% 6.7% 13.3% 3.8 20.0% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 6.7% 40.0% 6.7% 6.7% 4.0 40.0% 15
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
33.3% 13.3% 4.2 53.3% 15
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 53.3% 6.7% 13.3% 4.3 26.7% 15
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
40.0% 13.3% 4.3 46.7% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 16299
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6251: NUMERICAL & SIMULATION TECHNIQUES IN FINANCE
Response Rate: 8/10Primary Instructor: Weinberger,Edward
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 8
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 8
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 8
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 8
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 62.5% 25.0% 4.4 12.5% 8
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 62.5% 25.0% 4.4 12.5% 8
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 75.0% 12.5% 4.6 12.5% 8
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 75.0% 12.5% 4.6 12.5% 8
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 62.5% 12.5% 4.4 25.0% 8
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 75.0% 12.5% 4.6 12.5% 8
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 62.5% 12.5% 4.5 25.0% 8
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 62.5% 12.5% 4.5 25.0% 8
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 22445
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 6613: ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS
Response Rate: 22/30Primary Instructor: De Leon,Francisco
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 4.5% 95.5% 22
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 22
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 9.1% 77.3% 4.5% 4.5% 4.4 4.5% 22
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 4.5% 72.7% 4.5% 9.1% 4.4 9.1% 22
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 54.5% 4.5% 27.3% 4.3 13.6% 22
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 68.2% 4.5% 4.5% 4.7 22.7% 22
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 54.5% 4.5% 4.5% 4.4 36.4% 22
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 13.6% 40.9% 4.5% 22.7% 3.7 18.2% 22
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 54.5% 9.1% 4.4 36.4% 22
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 68.2% 4.7 31.8% 22
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 72.7% 4.5% 4.7 22.7% 22
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 63.6% 4.5% 4.6 31.8% 22
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 22270
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
URB 3834W: SPECIAL TOPICS IN SUSTAINABLE URBAN ENVIRONMENTS
Response Rate: 16/18Primary Instructor: Woods,David W
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 16
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 15
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 16
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 16
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 93.8% 4.9 6.3% 16
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 16
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 81.3% 4.8 18.8% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 16
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 16
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17083
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 4043: Sustainable Cities
Response Rate: 11/25Primary Instructor: Juran,Ilan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 10
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 45.5% 9.1% 18.2% 4.1 27.3% 11
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 45.5% 18.2% 4.3 36.4% 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 27.3% 36.4% 18.2% 3.4 18.2% 11
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 27.3% 27.3% 3.7 45.5% 11
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 18.2% 36.4% 9.1% 27.3% 3.4 9.1% 11
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 36.4% 9.1% 54.5% 3.6 11
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I can identify urban infrastructure challenges in a sector (e.g. water management,
congestion, safety and security of infrastructure)
50.0% 10.0% 4.3 40.0% 10
Q28 I know how to prepare, analyze and recommend potential for solutions for urban
infrastructure challenges
30.0% 10.0% 4.2 60.0% 10
Q29 I understand urban sustainability impact of deployed strategies 50.0% 10.0% 4.3 40.0% 10
Q30 I understand the role of Innovative Technology 10.0% 30.0% 4.0 60.0% 10
Q31 I can apply principles of disaster resilience and software application 40.0% 10.0% 4.2 50.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 18.2% 27.3% 18.2% 9.1% 3.3 27.3% 11
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 36.4% 9.1% 18.2% 4.0 36.4% 11
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 9.1% 45.5% 18.2% 18.2% 3.6 9.1% 11
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 27.3% 27.3% 27.3% 3.5 18.2% 11
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: ALEC
Class Number: 17448
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 3173: STRUCTURAL DESIGN
Response Rate: 32/19Primary Instructor: Whu,Alfonso
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 3.1% 96.9% 32
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 3.1% 96.9% 32
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 68.8% 3.1% 4.7 28.1% 32
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 3.2% 45.2% 9.7% 9.7% 4.1 32.3% 31
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 6.3% 18.8% 25.0% 15.6% 3.3 34.4% 32
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 6.3% 18.8% 28.1% 25.0% 3.2 21.9% 32
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 15.6% 18.8% 25.0% 12.5% 3.1 28.1% 32
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 12.5% 18.8% 21.9% 12.5% 3.3 34.4% 32
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 12.5% 28.1% 15.6% 3.1% 3.6 40.6% 32
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.1% 34.4% 9.4% 9.4% 4.0 43.8% 32
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 3.1% 28.1% 25.0% 25.0% 3.4 18.8% 32
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 9.4% 34.4% 15.6% 9.4% 3.7 31.3% 32
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 31.3% 9.4% 12.5% 4.0 46.9% 32
A41 I have enhanced my ability to develop a recognition of the need for, and an ability
to engage in life-long learning
15.6% 15.6% 18.8% 3.7 50.0% 32
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 12.5% 18.8% 18.8% 12.5% 3.3 37.5% 32
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: BLEC
Class Number: 17449
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 3173: STRUCTURAL DESIGN
Response Rate: 12/11Primary Instructor: Whu,Alfonso
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 8.3% 91.7% 12
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 8.3% 91.7% 12
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 41.7% 8.3% 4.3 50.0% 12
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 16.7% 16.7% 25.0% 16.7% 3.0 25.0% 12
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 25.0% 33.3% 3.2 41.7% 12
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 8.3% 33.3% 8.3% 3.0 50.0% 12
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 8.3% 25.0% 16.7% 3.1 50.0% 12
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 16.7% 25.0% 16.7% 16.7% 3.3 25.0% 12
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 8.3% 33.3% 3.4 58.3% 12
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 25.0% 16.7% 3.9 58.3% 12
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 16.7% 8.3% 16.7% 33.3% 2.9 25.0% 12
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 8.3% 25.0% 25.0% 3.8 41.7% 12
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 8.3% 16.7% 8.3% 3.7 66.7% 12
A41 I have enhanced my ability to develop a recognition of the need for, and an ability
to engage in life-long learning
16.7% 33.3% 3.3 50.0% 12
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 16.7% 25.0% 16.7% 2.8 41.7% 12
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17114
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
AE 4633: Aerospace Propulsion
Response Rate: 18/27Primary Instructor: Kalkhoran,Iraj M
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 18
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 18
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 77.8% 5.6% 4.7 16.7% 18
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 55.6% 11.1% 11.1% 4.2 22.2% 18
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 5.6% 55.6% 5.6% 11.1% 4.2 22.2% 18
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 55.6% 11.1% 5.6% 4.3 27.8% 18
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 61.1% 11.1% 5.6% 4.3 22.2% 18
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 11.1% 55.6% 11.1% 5.6% 3.9 16.7% 18
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learned the fundamentals of thermodynamics of breathing engines 72.2% 5.6% 4.7 22.2% 18
Q28 Know about ramjet, turbojet and turbofan engines 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 18
Q29 Learned the fundamental of inlet and nozzle flows 72.2% 11.1% 4.5 16.7% 18
Q30 Learned about the flow through compressors and turbines 55.6% 5.6% 5.6% 4.4 33.3% 18
Q31 Understand the performance of rocket vehicles 27.8% 27.8% 16.7% 22.2% 2.9 5.6% 18
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 11.1% 4.4 38.9% 18
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 55.6% 5.6% 11.1% 4.3 27.8% 18
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 61.1% 5.6% 22.2% 4.3 11.1% 18
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 61.1% 5.6% 16.7% 4.3 16.7% 18
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 44.4% 5.6% 4.4 50.0% 18
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 55.6% 5.6% 5.6% 4.4 33.3% 18
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
50.0% 5.6% 5.6% 4.3 38.9% 18
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: ALAB
Class Number: 17091
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 3223: Environmental Engineering I
Response Rate: 7/7Primary Instructor: Ahn,Jeong Eun
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
100.0% 5.0 7
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 42.9% 42.9% 1.9 14.3% 7
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 57.1% 4.6 42.9% 7
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 7
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 28.6% 57.1% 14.3% 3.0 7
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Understand the impact to our health and well-being caused by environmental
issues, such as water pollution, air pollution, and solid waste
57.1% 4.6 42.9% 7
Q28 Identify, formulate, and solve environmental problems by applying scientific and
engineering methods, such as risk assessment, solid waste management.
71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
Q29 Gain an understanding of the interrelationships of different areas (climate
change/carbon Emission, energy production/use, water quality) affecting the
environment.
42.9% 4.4 57.1% 7
Q30 Conduct experiments (i.e. water quality analysis including conductivity, turbidity,
pH, alkalinity, hardness), as well as analyze and interpret data.
85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 57.1% 4.6 42.9% 7
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 57.1% 4.6 42.9% 7
Q40 Value was added to my education. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 57.1% 14.3% 4.4 28.6% 7
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
57.1% 4.6 42.9% 7
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 42.9% 14.3% 4.3 42.9% 7
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
57.1% 4.6 42.9% 7
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: BLAB
Class Number: 17096
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 3223: Environmental Engineering I
Response Rate: 10/10Primary Instructor: Ahn,Jeong Eun
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
100.0% 5.0 10
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 50.0% 20.0% 10.0% 4.0 20.0% 10
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 10
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 70.0% 4.7 30.0% 10
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Understand the impact to our health and well-being caused by environmental
issues, such as water pollution, air pollution, and solid waste
80.0% 4.8 20.0% 10
Q28 Identify, formulate, and solve environmental problems by applying scientific and
engineering methods, such as risk assessment, solid waste management.
70.0% 4.7 30.0% 10
Q29 Gain an understanding of the interrelationships of different areas (climate
change/carbon Emission, energy production/use, water quality) affecting the
environment.
90.0% 10.0% 4.8 10
Q30 Conduct experiments (i.e. water quality analysis including conductivity, turbidity,
pH, alkalinity, hardness), as well as analyze and interpret data.
90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 10
Q40 Value was added to my education. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
90.0% 10.0% 4.8 10
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
90.0% 10.0% 4.7 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: E
Class Number: 17564
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2131: General Physics Laboratory II
Response Rate: 29/32Primary Instructor: Shakya,Naresh M
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
79.3% 3.4% 6.9% 4.7 10.3% 29
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 44.8% 6.9% 6.9% 4.2 41.4% 29
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 79.3% 3.4% 6.9% 4.7 10.3% 29
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 3.4% 65.5% 3.4% 10.3% 4.4 17.2% 29
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 6.9% 41.4% 6.9% 13.8% 3.9 31.0% 29
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 3.4% 55.2% 10.3% 3.4% 4.2 27.6% 29
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 10.3% 27.6% 13.8% 20.7% 3.5 27.6% 29
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 10.3% 27.6% 17.2% 13.8% 3.5 31.0% 29
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 13.8% 24.1% 31.0% 20.7% 3.0 10.3% 29
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 6.9% 55.2% 6.9% 13.8% 4.1 17.2% 29
Q40 Value was added to my education. 20.7% 24.1% 10.3% 20.7% 3.2 24.1% 29
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 34.5% 13.8% 17.2% 17.2% 2.6 17.2% 29
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A06 I have enhanced my ability to analyze and interpret data appropriately. 6.9% 6.9% 3.4% 20.7% 3.6 62.1% 29
A17 I have enhanced my ability to conduct experiments to validate hypotheses and
theories.
3.4% 20.7% 6.9% 17.2% 3.8 51.7% 29
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: AREC
Class Number: 17209
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 1213: MOTION AND SOUND
Response Rate: 17/27Primary Instructor: Lal,Akhil
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 16
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
62.5% 6.3% 4.6 31.3% 16
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 75.0% 6.3% 4.7 18.8% 16
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 68.8% 6.3% 4.6 25.0% 16
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: B1RC
Class Number: 17213
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2023: ELECTRICITY, MAGNETISM, & FLUIDS
Response Rate: 26/30Primary Instructor: Lal,Akhil
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 3.8% 80.8% 4.7 15.4% 26
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
3.8% 76.9% 7.7% 4.6 11.5% 26
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 7.7% 73.1% 7.7% 4.4 11.5% 26
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 3.8% 80.8% 7.7% 4.6 7.7% 26
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: B2RC
Class Number: 17225
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2033: WAVES, OPTICS, & THERMODYNAMICS
Response Rate: 21/24Primary Instructor: Lal,Akhil
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 4.8% 71.4% 9.5% 4.4 14.3% 21
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
4.8% 57.1% 4.8% 14.3% 4.8% 4.1 14.3% 21
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 4.8% 57.1% 4.8% 9.5% 4.3 23.8% 21
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 4.8% 61.9% 4.8% 19.0% 4.1 9.5% 21
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16746
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6291: APPLIED DERIVATIVE CONTRACTS
Response Rate: 8/11Primary Instructor: Slivka,Ronald
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 8
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 8
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 37.5% 25.0% 4.1 37.5% 8
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 62.5% 12.5% 4.5 25.0% 8
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 8
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 8
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 37.5% 4.4 62.5% 8
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 16747
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6291: APPLIED DERIVATIVE CONTRACTS
Response Rate: 24/25Primary Instructor: Slivka,Ronald
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 24
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 4.2% 95.8% 24
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 95.8% 5.0 4.2% 24
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 83.3% 8.3% 4.8 8.3% 24
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.2% 70.8% 4.2% 4.2% 4.5 16.7% 24
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 83.3% 4.2% 4.2% 8.3% 4.7 24
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 79.2% 4.2% 4.7 16.7% 24
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 83.3% 4.2% 4.8 12.5% 24
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 24
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 79.2% 8.3% 4.7 12.5% 24
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 87.5% 4.2% 4.8 8.3% 24
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 79.2% 8.3% 4.7 12.5% 24
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: I3
Class Number: 16748
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6291: APPLIED DERIVATIVE CONTRACTS
Response Rate: 6/9Primary Instructor: Slivka,Ronald
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 6
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 6
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16953
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 7821: TOPICS IN RISK FINANCE I
Response Rate: 19/21Primary Instructor: Slivka,Ronald
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 19
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 94.4% 5.6% 18
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 19
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 94.7% 4.9 5.3% 19
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 73.7% 4.7 26.3% 19
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 89.5% 4.9 10.5% 19
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 89.5% 4.9 10.5% 19
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 19
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 78.9% 4.8 21.1% 19
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 84.2% 4.8 15.8% 19
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 19
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 94.7% 4.9 5.3% 19
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: D
Class Number: 16655
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 9223: SELECTED TOPICS IN CS
Response Rate: 48/48Primary Instructor: McIntosh,Suzanne
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 48
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 48
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 95.8% 5.0 4.2% 48
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 97.9% 5.0 2.1% 48
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 93.8% 4.9 6.3% 48
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 91.7% 4.9 8.3% 48
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 93.8% 4.9 6.3% 48
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 95.8% 5.0 4.2% 48
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 79.2% 4.8 20.8% 48
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 93.8% 4.9 6.3% 48
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 97.9% 5.0 2.1% 48
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 97.9% 5.0 2.1% 48
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: H
Class Number: 24297
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 9223: SELECTED TOPICS IN CS
Response Rate: 30/48Primary Instructor: Silva,Claudio
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 13.3% 86.7% 30
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 13.8% 82.8% 3.4% 29
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 3.3% 63.3% 3.3% 4.5 30.0% 30
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 3.3% 53.3% 6.7% 10.0% 4.2 26.7% 30
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 10.0% 6.7% 4.2 33.3% 30
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 3.3% 73.3% 3.3% 4.6 20.0% 30
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 6.7% 53.3% 6.7% 10.0% 4.1 23.3% 30
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 6.7% 50.0% 6.7% 4.2 36.7% 30
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 10.0% 46.7% 3.3% 4.1 40.0% 30
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.3% 56.7% 6.7% 6.7% 4.3 26.7% 30
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 6.7% 53.3% 10.0% 4.2 30.0% 30
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 6.7% 60.0% 6.7% 13.3% 4.1 13.3% 30
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17195
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 1012: INTRO TO COMPUTER ENGINEERING
Response Rate: 34/47Primary Instructor: Krikorian-Ezik,Nina
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 5.9% 88.2% 5.9% 34
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.9% 85.3% 8.8% 34
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 20.6% 26.5% 2.9% 17.6% 11.8% 3.2 20.6% 34
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 5.9% 38.2% 11.8% 23.5% 3.7 20.6% 34
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 8.8% 26.5% 11.8% 5.9% 3.7 47.1% 34
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 2.9% 41.2% 5.9% 20.6% 4.0 29.4% 34
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 20.6% 11.8% 26.5% 8.8% 2.9 32.4% 34
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 5.9% 23.5% 8.8% 20.6% 3.7 41.2% 34
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 29.4% 2.9% 23.5% 17.6% 2.5 26.5% 34
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 23.5% 11.8% 2.9% 8.8% 26.5% 2.9 26.5% 34
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 29.4% 11.8% 2.9% 17.6% 23.5% 2.6 14.7% 34
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 26.5% 11.8% 20.6% 17.6% 2.7 23.5% 34
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16327
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6123: Human Resource Management
Response Rate: 13/13Primary Instructor: Miller,Marc S
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 13
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 13
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 84.6% 4.8 15.4% 13
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 84.6% 7.7% 7.7% 4.8 13
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 84.6% 4.8 15.4% 13
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 92.3% 7.7% 4.8 13
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 69.2% 7.7% 7.7% 4.7 15.4% 13
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 76.9% 4.8 23.1% 13
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 7.7% 53.8% 7.7% 4.2 30.8% 13
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
61.5% 7.7% 7.7% 4.4 23.1% 13
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
53.8% 7.7% 7.7% 4.3 30.8% 13
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
61.5% 7.7% 7.7% 4.4 23.1% 13
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 69.2% 7.7% 4.5 23.1% 13
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 84.6% 15.4% 4.7 13
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 76.9% 7.7% 4.7 15.4% 13
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 84.6% 15.4% 4.7 13
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LVL1
Class Number: 16765
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6123: Human Resource Management
Response Rate: 1/3Primary Instructor: Miller,Marc S
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 1
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 1
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 1
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 3.0 1
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 4.0 100.0% 1
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.0 100.0% 1
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
4.0 100.0% 1
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
4.0 100.0% 1
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
4.0 100.0% 1
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 4.0 100.0% 1
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 4.0 100.0% 1
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
4.0 100.0% 1
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 4.0 100.0% 1
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
4.0 100.0% 1
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 4.0 100.0% 1
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 100.0% 5.0 1
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 4.0 100.0% 1
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 4.0 100.0% 1
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 4.0 100.0% 1
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 4.0 100.0% 1
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 4.0 100.0% 1
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.0 100.0% 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LVL1
Class Number: 16765
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6123: Human Resource Management
Response Rate: 1/3Primary Instructor: Miller,Marc S
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 4.0 100.0% 1
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.0 100.0% 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 17131
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 4113: Senior Design II
Response Rate: 30/43Primary Instructor: Borowiec,Joseph Anthony
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 30
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 28
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 93.3% 4.9 6.7% 30
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 93.3% 4.9 6.7% 30
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 96.7% 5.0 3.3% 30
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 86.7% 3.3% 4.9 10.0% 30
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 86.7% 4.9 13.3% 30
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 70.0% 6.7% 10.0% 4.6 13.3% 30
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learn to apply numerical analysis via modern software tools to a design project 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 30
Q28 Learn to put together a Test and Evaluation Plan and Report and about Design of
Experiments
76.7% 4.8 23.3% 30
Q29 Learn about designing for the environment 63.3% 4.6 36.7% 30
Q30 Learn about the relevance of continuing education 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 30
Q31 Learn the process of building and testing to specifications an engineering product 76.7% 4.8 23.3% 30
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 30
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 86.7% 4.9 13.3% 30
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 93.3% 4.9 6.7% 30
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 30
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to
analyze and interpret data
70.0% 4.7 30.0% 30
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
83.3% 4.8 16.7% 30
A40 I have enhanced my ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
global and societal context
76.7% 4.8 23.3% 30
A41 I have enhanced my ability to recognize the need for, and an ability to engage in
life-long learning
76.7% 3.3% 4.7 20.0% 30
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
76.7% 4.8 23.3% 30
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17452
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 4113: Senior Design II
Response Rate: 35/44Primary Instructor: Borowiec,Joseph Anthony
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 35
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 97.1% 2.9% 34
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 88.6% 4.9 11.4% 35
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 85.7% 5.7% 4.8 8.6% 35
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 77.1% 4.8 22.9% 35
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 80.0% 2.9% 2.9% 4.7 14.3% 35
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 74.3% 2.9% 4.7 22.9% 35
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 60.0% 2.9% 22.9% 4.3 14.3% 35
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learn to apply numerical analysis via modern software tools to a design project 62.9% 2.9% 4.6 34.3% 35
Q28 Learn to put together a Test and Evaluation Plan and Report and about Design of
Experiments
65.7% 4.7 34.3% 35
Q29 Learn about designing for the environment 57.1% 11.4% 4.5 31.4% 35
Q30 Learn about the relevance of continuing education 67.6% 11.8% 4.6 20.6% 34
Q31 Learn the process of building and testing to specifications an engineering product 68.6% 4.7 31.4% 35
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 2.9% 65.7% 2.9% 5.7% 4.5 22.9% 35
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 71.4% 2.9% 2.9% 4.6 22.9% 35
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 82.9% 2.9% 4.8 14.3% 35
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 77.1% 2.9% 2.9% 4.7 17.1% 35
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to
analyze and interpret data
68.6% 2.9% 4.7 28.6% 35
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
67.6% 2.9% 4.6 29.4% 34
A40 I have enhanced my ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
global and societal context
57.1% 8.6% 4.5 34.3% 35
A41 I have enhanced my ability to recognize the need for, and an ability to engage in
life-long learning
61.8% 5.9% 4.6 32.4% 34
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
77.1% 4.8 22.9% 35
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Class Number: 1013A-Mugglin,David
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 1013: MECHANICS
Response Rate: 42/55Primary Instructor: Mugglin,David
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 4.8% 90.5% 4.8% 42
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.0% 90.0% 5.0% 40
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 83.3% 2.4% 2.4% 4.8 11.9% 42
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 61.9% 7.1% 21.4% 4.4 9.5% 42
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 61.9% 2.4% 4.8% 16.7% 4.4 14.3% 42
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 4.8% 66.7% 2.4% 4.8% 7.1% 4.4 14.3% 42
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 2.4% 50.0% 2.4% 2.4% 7.1% 4.3 35.7% 42
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 2.4% 47.6% 9.5% 2.4% 14.3% 4.2 23.8% 42
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 2.4% 40.5% 2.4% 11.9% 4.1 42.9% 42
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 2.4% 47.6% 4.8% 2.4% 4.4 42.9% 42
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 81.0% 2.4% 4.8% 4.8 11.9% 42
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 2.4% 66.7% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 4.5 23.8% 42
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Class Number: 2033B-Mugglin,David
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2033: WAVES, OPTICS, & THERMODYNAMICS
Response Rate: 63/99Primary Instructor: Mugglin,David
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 6.3% 93.7% 63
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 1.6% 96.8% 1.6% 62
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 82.5% 1.6% 3.2% 4.8 12.7% 63
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 1.6% 68.3% 1.6% 4.8% 11.1% 4.4 12.7% 63
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 74.6% 1.6% 3.2% 4.7 20.6% 63
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 69.8% 6.3% 3.2% 4.5 20.6% 63
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 4.8% 57.1% 11.1% 4.8% 4.2 22.2% 63
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 1.6% 60.3% 3.2% 4.8% 11.1% 4.4 19.0% 63
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 56.5% 6.5% 6.5% 4.4 30.6% 62
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 6.3% 55.6% 7.9% 4.8% 4.2 25.4% 63
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 1.6% 72.6% 4.8% 3.2% 4.5 17.7% 62
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 9.5% 55.6% 3.2% 4.8% 3.2% 4.1 23.8% 63
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17072
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2344: INTRODUCTION TO MODERN AND SOLID STATE PHYSICS
Response Rate: 16/20Primary Instructor: Mugglin,David
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 16
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 16
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 93.8% 4.9 6.3% 16
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 87.5% 12.5% 4.8 16
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 16
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 93.8% 4.9 6.3% 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 93.8% 4.9 6.3% 16
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 56.3% 4.6 43.8% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 81.3% 4.8 18.8% 16
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 93.8% 4.9 6.3% 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 75.0% 12.5% 4.6 12.5% 16
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: K
Class Number: 17292
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 1024: Calculus I for Engineers
Response Rate: 1/24Primary Instructor: Khachatorian,Daniel
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 1
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 1
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 1
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 1
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 1
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
100.0% 5.0 1
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q29 I need more HW problems. 100.0% 5.0 1
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 1
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 17447
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 2414: Basic Practice of Statistics for Social Science
Response Rate: 1/23Primary Instructor: Khachatorian,Daniel
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 1
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 1
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 3.0 1
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 3.0 1
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 1
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 1
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
100.0% 3.0 1
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 100.0% 3.0 1
Q29 I need more HW problems. 100.0% 1.0 1
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.0 100.0% 1
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 21584
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 9103: SPECIAL TOPICS IN DIGITAL MEDIA
Response Rate: 6/8Primary Instructor: Bennett,Katherine
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 6
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 6
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 16.7% 4.2 33.3% 6
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 33.3% 33.3% 4.0 33.3% 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 16.7% 4.2 33.3% 6
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 16.7% 4.2 83.3% 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 16.7% 4.2 83.3% 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16859
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 9963: MS Pre-Thesis in Digital Media: Research Methods
Response Rate: 10/12Primary Instructor: Bennett,Katherine
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 10.0% 90.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 9
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 20.0% 20.0% 10.0% 3.7 50.0% 10
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 10.0% 50.0% 4.2 40.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 30.0% 10.0% 4.1 60.0% 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 10.0% 30.0% 30.0% 3.7 30.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 10.0% 20.0% 20.0% 30.0% 3.2 20.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 20.0% 60.0% 3.0 20.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 30.0% 40.0% 3.5 30.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 10.0% 40.0% 10.0% 4.0 40.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 10.0% 40.0% 10.0% 20.0% 3.7 20.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 30.0% 20.0% 40.0% 3.5 10.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 17051
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 2054: Applied Business Data Analysis I
Response Rate: 2/24Primary Instructor: Zhao,Fang
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 2
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 2
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 2
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 50.0% 3.0 2
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 3.5 50.0% 2
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 2
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 50.0% 3.0 2
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
50.0% 50.0% 3.5 2
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 100.0% 3.0 2
Q29 I need more HW problems. 50.0% 3.0 50.0% 2
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.0 100.0% 2
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 3.5 50.0% 2
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 2
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 50.0% 3.0 2
P. AACSB-As a result of taking tthis course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A47 I have learned foundation knowledge for business in Math & Statistics 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: ALEC
Class Number: 17390
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 4214: Finite Element Modeling, Design and Analysis
Response Rate: 13/16Primary Instructor: Luong,Dung Dinh
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 13
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 13
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 13
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 13
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 92.3% 4.9 7.7% 13
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 76.9% 15.4% 4.6 7.7% 13
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 13
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 13
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learned the principles of finite element analysis and the application of boundary
conditions and symmetry conditions
92.3% 4.9 7.7% 13
Q28 Learned about setting up solution methods for beams and frames and the
post-processing procedures to extract information such as stresses and strains.
100.0% 5.0 13
Q29 Learned modeling using Ansys. 100.0% 5.0 13
Q30 Learned about contemporary issues in the field of FEA. 76.9% 4.8 23.1% 13
Q31 Learned about impact of FEA on medicine, design, and aerospace industry. 84.6% 4.8 15.4% 13
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 92.3% 7.7% 4.8 13
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 13
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 84.6% 4.8 15.4% 13
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 92.3% 7.7% 4.8 13
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 100.0% 5.0 13
A40 I have enhanced my ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
global and societal context
100.0% 5.0 13
A42 I have enhanced my knowledge of contemporary issues 84.6% 4.8 15.4% 13
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
100.0% 5.0 13
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: ALAB
Class Number: 17391
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 4214: Finite Element Modeling, Design and Analysis
Response Rate: 12/16Primary Instructor: Luong,Dung Dinh
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
83.3% 8.3% 4.8 8.3% 12
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 100.0% 5.0 12
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 91.7% 4.9 8.3% 12
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 12
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 66.7% 8.3% 4.5 25.0% 12
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learned the principles of finite element analysis and the application of boundary
conditions and symmetry conditions
83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
Q28 Learned about setting up solution methods for beams and frames and the
post-processing procedures to extract information such as stresses and strains.
83.3% 8.3% 4.8 8.3% 12
Q29 Learned modeling using Ansys. 100.0% 5.0 12
Q30 Learned about contemporary issues in the field of FEA. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
Q31 Learned about impact of FEA on medicine, design, and aerospace industry. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 75.0% 8.3% 4.7 16.7% 12
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 66.7% 8.3% 4.6 25.0% 12
Q40 Value was added to my education. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 12
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
A40 I have enhanced my ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
global and societal context
83.3% 8.3% 4.7 8.3% 12
A42 I have enhanced my knowledge of contemporary issues 66.7% 8.3% 4.6 25.0% 12
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17155
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
MT 2813: Introduction to Materials Science
Response Rate: 16/18Primary Instructor: Luong,Dung Dinh
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 6.3% 93.8% 16
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 16
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 75.0% 6.3% 4.6 18.8% 16
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 56.3% 6.3% 4.4 37.5% 16
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 56.3% 6.3% 12.5% 4.3 25.0% 16
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 43.8% 6.3% 4.4 50.0% 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 43.8% 12.5% 6.3% 4.1 37.5% 16
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 6.3% 4.4 43.8% 16
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learned about the atomic structure of matter, about atomic arrangements and
crystal structures, and about crystal defects
68.8% 4.7 31.3% 16
Q28 Learned about mechanical testing and behavior of materials and fracture 56.3% 4.6 43.8% 16
Q29 Learned about the relationship between microstructure and mechanical properties 56.3% 4.6 43.8% 16
Q30 Learned about alloy phase diagrams 62.5% 6.3% 4.6 31.3% 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 18.8% 6.3% 4.1 25.0% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 6.3% 6.3% 4.3 37.5% 16
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 6.3% 50.0% 6.3% 4.2 37.5% 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 37.5% 12.5% 31.3% 3.8 18.8% 16
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 73.3% 4.7 26.7% 15
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
60.0% 6.7% 4.5 33.3% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: D2RC
Class Number: 17551
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 1013: MECHANICS
Response Rate: 21/29Primary Instructor: Mananga,Eugene S
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 55.6% 5.6% 4.6 38.9% 18
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
33.3% 5.6% 11.1% 4.2 50.0% 18
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 55.6% 5.6% 4.6 38.9% 18
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 55.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 4.4 27.8% 18
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: B4RC
Class Number: 23848
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2033: WAVES, OPTICS, & THERMODYNAMICS
Response Rate: 23/25Primary Instructor: Mananga,Eugene S
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 4.3% 73.9% 4.3% 4.3% 4.5 13.0% 23
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
4.3% 65.2% 4.3% 4.3% 8.7% 4.4 13.0% 23
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 4.3% 60.9% 4.3% 4.3% 4.4 26.1% 23
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 4.3% 78.3% 4.3% 8.7% 4.6 4.3% 23
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: B1RC
Class Number: 17061
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 1013: MECHANICS
Response Rate: 16/24Primary Instructor: Petricevic,Vladimir
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 15
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
40.0% 6.7% 33.3% 3.9 20.0% 15
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 46.7% 6.7% 4.4 46.7% 15
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 53.3% 13.3% 4.4 33.3% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: D1RC
Class Number: 17549
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 1013: MECHANICS
Response Rate: 24/29Primary Instructor: Petricevic,Vladimir
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 82.6% 4.3% 4.3% 4.7 8.7% 23
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
39.1% 4.3% 8.7% 17.4% 4.0 30.4% 23
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 43.5% 8.7% 8.7% 4.2 39.1% 23
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 56.5% 8.7% 13.0% 4.3 21.7% 23
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: B1RC
Class Number: 17223
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2033: WAVES, OPTICS, & THERMODYNAMICS
Response Rate: 21/25Primary Instructor: Petricevic,Vladimir
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.0% 4.8 15.0% 20
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
55.0% 5.0% 35.0% 4.2 5.0% 20
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 75.0% 5.0% 4.7 20.0% 20
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 80.0% 5.0% 4.7 15.0% 20
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 22265
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
PS 3164: HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
Response Rate: 26/29Primary Instructor: Lytle,Ashley Elizabeth
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 26
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 26
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 26
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 92.3% 3.8% 4.9 3.8% 26
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 92.3% 3.8% 4.9 3.8% 26
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 96.2% 3.8% 4.9 26
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 92.3% 4.9 7.7% 26
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 76.9% 15.4% 4.6 7.7% 26
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 80.8% 3.8% 3.8% 4.7 11.5% 26
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 84.6% 4.8 15.4% 26
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 26
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 96.2% 3.8% 4.9 26
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 22251
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
EN 2124W: The Short Story
Response Rate: 18/12Primary Instructor: Marks,Sylvia
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 88.9% 11.1% 18
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 18
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 18
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 18
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 18
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 33.3% 11.1% 4.2 55.6% 18
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 18
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 18
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 44.4% 11.1% 4.2 44.4% 18
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 44.4% 11.1% 4.2 44.4% 18
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 55.6% 11.1% 4.4 33.3% 18
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 44.4% 11.1% 11.1% 4.1 33.3% 18
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 22252
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
EN 2174W: THE WORLD'S GREATEST JOURNEYS
Response Rate: 3/7Primary Instructor: Marks,Sylvia
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 3
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 3
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 33.3% 3.3 66.7% 3
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.0 100.0% 3
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 16724
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6083: Quantitative Methods in Finance
Response Rate: 4/5Primary Instructor: Papanicolaou,Andrew
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 4
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 4
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 50.0% 25.0% 4.0 25.0% 4
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 3.5 4
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 25.0% 75.0% 4.0 4
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 25.0% 75.0% 4.0 4
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 25.0% 75.0% 4.0 4
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 25.0% 75.0% 4.0 4
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 25.0% 4.0 25.0% 4
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 25.0% 75.0% 4.0 4
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 25.0% 75.0% 4.0 4
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 25.0% 75.0% 4.0 4
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 23262
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6311: Dynamic Assets and Options Pricing
Response Rate: 8/9Primary Instructor: Papanicolaou,Andrew
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 8
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 8
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 8
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 75.0% 12.5% 4.5 12.5% 8
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 87.5% 12.5% 4.8 8
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 8
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 75.0% 12.5% 4.5 12.5% 8
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 8
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 8
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 8
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 17000
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 8213: INFORMATION SECURITY FOR MANAGERS
Response Rate: 4/6Primary Instructor: Felberbaum,Arnold Louis
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 4
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 4
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 50.0% 25.0% 4.0 25.0% 4
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 25.0% 75.0% 4.0 4
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 75.0% 25.0% 4.5 4
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 25.0% 3.3 75.0% 4
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 50.0% 25.0% 4.0 25.0% 4
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 3.0 25.0% 4
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 3.3 4
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 50.0% 25.0% 4.0 25.0% 4
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
50.0% 50.0% 3.0 4
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
25.0% 25.0% 3.8 50.0% 4
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 25.0% 25.0% 3.5 50.0% 4
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 50.0% 25.0% 4.0 25.0% 4
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 25.0% 25.0% 50.0% 3.0 4
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 25.0% 75.0% 2.5 4
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 25.0% 25.0% 50.0% 3.0 4
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 3.3 4
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 17000
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 8213: INFORMATION SECURITY FOR MANAGERS
Response Rate: 4/6Primary Instructor: Felberbaum,Arnold Louis
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17479
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 1123: Visual Foundation Studio
Response Rate: 18/18Primary Instructor: Seegers,Jesse T
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 18
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 94.4% 5.6% 18
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 83.3% 5.6% 4.8 11.1% 18
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 66.7% 5.6% 11.1% 4.4 16.7% 18
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 33.3% 5.6% 11.1% 4.1 50.0% 18
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 61.1% 5.6% 33.3% 4.3 18
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 11.1% 72.2% 4.4 16.7% 18
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 11.1% 50.0% 16.7% 16.7% 4.0 5.6% 18
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 5.6% 66.7% 5.6% 5.6% 4.3 16.7% 18
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 11.1% 66.7% 5.6% 4.4 16.7% 18
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 11.8% 70.6% 4.4 17.6% 17
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 11.1% 66.7% 4.3 22.2% 18
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: MOT
Class Number: 21573
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 9753: SELECTED TOPICS IN MANAGEMENT
Response Rate: 41/42Primary Instructor: Bonilla,JeanCarlo
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 41
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 40
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 2.4% 80.5% 2.4% 4.7 14.6% 41
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 5.0% 65.0% 5.0% 2.5% 4.4 22.5% 40
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 9.8% 48.8% 22.0% 3.8 19.5% 41
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 4.9% 56.1% 7.3% 2.4% 4.2 29.3% 41
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 4.9% 61.0% 7.3% 4.3 26.8% 41
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.9% 51.2% 7.3% 4.3 36.6% 41
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 70.7% 4.9% 2.4% 4.6 22.0% 41
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
61.0% 7.3% 2.4% 4.4 29.3% 41
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
63.4% 7.3% 7.3% 4.4 22.0% 41
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
65.9% 7.3% 9.8% 4.4 17.1% 41
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 7.5% 52.5% 7.5% 10.0% 4.1 22.5% 40
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 70.7% 4.9% 2.4% 4.6 22.0% 41
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 4.9% 63.4% 4.9% 4.9% 4.3 22.0% 41
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.9% 63.4% 4.9% 4.4 26.8% 41
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: EMOT
Class Number: 21574
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 9753: SELECTED TOPICS IN MANAGEMENT
Response Rate: 25/29Primary Instructor: Bonilla,JeanCarlo
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 25
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 95.5% 4.5% 22
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 68.0% 4.0% 4.6 28.0% 25
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 4.2% 58.3% 4.2% 8.3% 4.3 25.0% 24
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 8.0% 24.0% 16.0% 4.0% 3.6 48.0% 25
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 36.0% 12.0% 16.0% 4.0 36.0% 25
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 40.0% 4.0% 4.3 56.0% 25
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.0% 36.0% 12.0% 4.0% 4.0 44.0% 25
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 4.2% 62.5% 4.2% 4.5 29.2% 24
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
50.0% 4.2% 8.3% 4.3 37.5% 24
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
4.2% 54.2% 4.2% 4.3 37.5% 24
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
62.5% 4.2% 4.5 33.3% 24
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.0% 36.0% 12.0% 8.0% 3.9 40.0% 25
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 64.0% 4.6 36.0% 25
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 4.0% 44.0% 8.0% 4.2 44.0% 25
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 56.0% 12.0% 4.4 32.0% 25
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17030
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 3214: Advanced Corporate Finance
Response Rate: 11/16Primary Instructor: D'Emic,Michael T
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 11
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 11
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 72.7% 4.7 27.3% 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 11
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 11
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 72.7% 4.7 27.3% 11
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
63.6% 4.6 36.4% 11
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: EMOT
Class Number: 21559
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6093: ACCOUNTING & FINANCE
Response Rate: 37/38Primary Instructor: D'Emic,Michael T
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 97.3% 2.7% 37
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 97.2% 2.8% 36
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 36
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 69.4% 2.8% 8.3% 4.5 19.4% 36
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 73.0% 8.1% 2.7% 4.5 16.2% 37
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 62.2% 10.8% 5.4% 4.4 21.6% 37
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 8.1% 40.5% 24.3% 3.7 27.0% 37
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 5.4% 56.8% 8.1% 4.2 29.7% 37
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 10.8% 51.4% 5.4% 8.1% 4.0 24.3% 37
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
51.4% 8.1% 8.1% 4.3 32.4% 37
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
5.4% 54.1% 2.7% 4.3 37.8% 37
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
2.7% 43.2% 5.4% 5.4% 4.2 43.2% 37
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 5.4% 35.1% 2.7% 13.5% 5.4% 3.9 37.8% 37
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 59.5% 8.1% 4.4 32.4% 37
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 5.4% 43.2% 16.2% 13.5% 3.8 21.6% 37
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 8.1% 51.4% 2.7% 10.8% 8.1% 4.0 18.9% 37
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16919
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 6483: Real Time Embedded Systems
Response Rate: 65/96Primary Instructor: Krishnamurthy,Prashanth
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 65
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 1.6% 98.4% 63
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 1.5% 75.4% 3.1% 1.5% 4.6 18.5% 65
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 83.1% 1.5% 4.6% 4.8 10.8% 65
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.6% 52.3% 15.4% 4.6% 4.0 23.1% 65
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 69.2% 1.5% 3.1% 4.6 26.2% 65
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 1.5% 63.1% 3.1% 4.6% 4.5 27.7% 65
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 58.5% 4.6% 12.3% 4.4 24.6% 65
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 3.1% 41.5% 4.6% 15.4% 4.1 35.4% 65
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 67.7% 1.5% 6.2% 4.6 24.6% 65
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 70.8% 4.6% 1.5% 4.6 23.1% 65
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 73.8% 6.2% 3.1% 4.6 16.9% 65
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16786
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 9033: SELECTED TOPICS IN CS
Response Rate: 30/30Primary Instructor: Bickford,Jeffrey
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 96.7% 3.3% 30
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 6.7% 86.7% 6.7% 30
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 3.3% 4.8 16.7% 30
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 76.7% 13.3% 3.3% 4.8 6.7% 30
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 53.3% 10.0% 3.3% 6.7% 4.4 26.7% 30
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 70.0% 10.0% 6.7% 4.7 13.3% 30
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 80.0% 3.3% 4.8 16.7% 30
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 3.3% 10.0% 4.6 20.0% 30
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 3.3% 66.7% 3.3% 4.6 26.7% 30
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 86.7% 3.3% 4.9 10.0% 30
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 93.3% 3.3% 5.0 3.3% 30
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 86.7% 3.3% 3.3% 4.9 6.7% 30
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17189
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 1502: LEADERSHIP & FOUNDATIONS OF CONST MGMT
Response Rate: 24/28Primary Instructor: Pennella,Ronald J.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 20.8% 66.7% 12.5% 24
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 4.2% 95.8% 24
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 79.2% 4.8 20.8% 24
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 62.5% 8.3% 4.5 29.2% 24
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 24
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 73.9% 4.3% 4.3% 4.6 17.4% 23
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 4.2% 54.2% 4.2% 4.3 37.5% 24
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.2% 58.3% 4.2% 8.3% 4.3 25.0% 24
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I understand the construction management profession. 41.7% 4.2% 4.2% 4.3 50.0% 24
Q28 I understand the roles of the construction process participants. 4.2% 50.0% 4.4 45.8% 24
Q29 Know the basic terminology of the construction industry. 50.0% 8.3% 4.2% 4.3 37.5% 24
Q30 Recognize the importance of leadership in construction. 75.0% 4.2% 4.7 20.8% 24
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 41.7% 4.2% 8.3% 16.7% 4.1 29.2% 24
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 45.8% 4.2% 4.4 50.0% 24
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 62.5% 4.2% 4.2% 4.5 29.2% 24
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 58.3% 4.2% 8.3% 4.4 29.2% 24
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 23234
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 7723: SELECTED TOPICS IN ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING II
Response Rate: 21/21Primary Instructor: Messaros,Roy C
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 21
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 21
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 4.8% 85.7% 4.7 9.5% 21
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 4.8% 85.7% 4.7 9.5% 21
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.8% 95.2% 4.8 21
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 4.8% 90.5% 4.8 4.8% 21
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 4.8% 66.7% 4.5 28.6% 21
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.8% 76.2% 4.8% 4.6 14.3% 21
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I understand the fundamental concepts of hydrology, hydrologic cycle, water
balance/budget, and hydraulics as it relates to lakes.
76.5% 4.8 23.5% 17
Q28 I understand how lakes and wetlands are different and their individual function for
environmental sustainability.
88.2% 4.9 11.8% 17
Q29 I became knowledgeable for water quality and ecosystem health and value. 88.2% 4.9 11.8% 17
Q30 I developed an understanding/skills for water quality evaluation and how to
improve water quality in aquatic ecosystems.
82.4% 4.8 17.6% 17
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.8% 57.1% 4.8% 4.3 33.3% 21
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.8% 76.2% 4.8% 4.6 14.3% 21
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 4.8% 76.2% 4.8% 4.6 14.3% 21
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.8% 66.7% 4.8% 4.5 23.8% 21
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: G
Class Number: 21589
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 9103: SPECIAL TOPICS IN DIGITAL MEDIA
Response Rate: 14/16Primary Instructor: Karwas,Dana L
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 14
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 7.1% 92.9% 14
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 78.6% 7.1% 4.7 14.3% 14
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 57.1% 7.1% 4.4 35.7% 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 30.8% 15.4% 23.1% 15.4% 2.6 15.4% 13
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 30.8% 7.7% 53.8% 3.8 7.7% 13
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 35.7% 7.1% 7.1% 4.1 50.0% 14
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 7.1% 35.7% 7.1% 42.9% 3.6 7.1% 14
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 71.4% 7.1% 4.6 21.4% 14
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 50.0% 7.1% 7.1% 4.3 35.7% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 64.3% 4.6 35.7% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16859
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 9963: MS Pre-Thesis in Digital Media: Research Methods
Response Rate: 10/12Primary Instructor: Karwas,Dana L
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 10.0% 90.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 9
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 20.0% 20.0% 10.0% 3.7 50.0% 10
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 10.0% 50.0% 4.2 40.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 30.0% 10.0% 4.1 60.0% 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 10.0% 30.0% 30.0% 3.7 30.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 10.0% 20.0% 20.0% 30.0% 3.2 20.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 20.0% 60.0% 3.0 20.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 30.0% 40.0% 3.5 30.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 10.0% 40.0% 10.0% 4.0 40.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 10.0% 40.0% 10.0% 20.0% 3.7 20.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 30.0% 20.0% 40.0% 3.5 10.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17233
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 4513: Software Engineering
Response Rate: 36/47Primary Instructor: Strauss,Fred J.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 36
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 34
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.6% 2.8% 4.8 16.7% 36
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 60.0% 2.9% 4.6 37.1% 35
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 2.8% 11.1% 4.3 36.1% 36
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 61.1% 5.6% 2.8% 4.5 30.6% 36
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 2.8% 55.6% 5.6% 5.6% 4.3 30.6% 36
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 2.8% 44.4% 2.8% 2.8% 4.3 47.2% 36
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I am comfortable with describing the principles of modern software engineering,
the software development life cycles, and project management
30.3% 3.0% 3.0% 4.2 63.6% 33
Q28 I am comfortable writing software requirements and specifications 36.4% 6.1% 9.1% 4.2 48.5% 33
Q29 I am comfortable in working in a team to develop a “real-world” solution to a
problem
51.5% 3.0% 6.1% 4.4 39.4% 33
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 44.4% 2.8% 13.9% 4.3 38.9% 36
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 55.6% 5.6% 5.6% 4.4 33.3% 36
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 2.8% 75.0% 2.8% 2.8% 4.6 16.7% 36
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 63.9% 8.3% 2.8% 4.4 25.0% 36
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A23 I have enhanced my ability to bring in outside experiences to provide solutions to
problems
45.5% 3.0% 12.1% 4.3 39.4% 33
A29 I have enhanced my ability to understand how engineering solutions impact society 45.5% 12.1% 4.3 42.4% 33
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 39.4% 3.0% 9.1% 4.2 48.5% 33
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: BKLN
Class Number: 17099
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 4523: Design Project
Response Rate: 19/42Primary Instructor: Strauss,Fred J.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 19
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.3% 89.5% 5.3% 19
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 84.2% 5.3% 4.8 10.5% 19
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 94.7% 4.9 5.3% 19
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 73.7% 5.3% 4.6 21.1% 19
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 89.5% 4.9 10.5% 19
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 68.4% 5.3% 5.3% 4.5 21.1% 19
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 42.1% 5.3% 5.3% 15.8% 4.2 31.6% 19
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I am comfortable implementing a software solution for a team project and
presenting the results.
63.2% 5.3% 4.5 31.6% 19
Q28 I am comfortable using software design techniques including Object-Oriented, Agile
and life cycle models to function-based system in a team environment
57.9% 5.3% 4.5 36.8% 19
Q29 I am comfortable with describing the principles of modern software engineering,
the software development life cycles, and project management
47.4% 5.3% 5.3% 4.3 42.1% 19
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 63.2% 5.3% 4.6 31.6% 19
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 73.7% 5.3% 5.3% 4.6 15.8% 19
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 84.2% 10.5% 4.7 5.3% 19
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 73.7% 5.3% 5.3% 4.6 15.8% 19
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A05 I have enhanced my ability to solve engineering problems. 5.3% 42.1% 15.8% 4.1 36.8% 19
A12 I have enhanced my ability to design a digital system that meets the desired speed,
space and cost constraints.
31.6% 5.3% 10.5% 4.1 52.6% 19
A18 I have enhanced my ability to use modern software tools. 5.3% 42.1% 15.8% 4.1 36.8% 19
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 42.1% 10.5% 4.3 47.4% 19
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
42.1% 5.3% 5.3% 5.3% 4.3 42.1% 19
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16783
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6063: Software Engineering I
Response Rate: 26/39Primary Instructor: Strauss,Fred J.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 3.8% 96.2% 26
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 3.8% 92.3% 3.8% 26
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.8% 7.7% 3.8% 4.6 7.7% 26
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 73.1% 7.7% 11.5% 4.5 7.7% 26
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 7.7% 4.3 42.3% 26
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 3.8% 57.7% 7.7% 3.8% 4.3 26.9% 26
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 11.5% 46.2% 19.2% 3.7 23.1% 26
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 7.7% 50.0% 19.2% 3.9 23.1% 26
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I am comfortable describing the management issues including software cost
estimating and project management for a software system
4.2% 33.3% 8.3% 4.0 54.2% 24
Q28 I am comfortable with describing the principles of modern software engineering,
the software development life cycles, and project management
50.0% 8.3% 8.3% 4.3 33.3% 24
Q29 I am comfortable with taking a project proposal and creating a set of business and
system requirement, and performing a system analysis.
50.0% 8.3% 4.2% 4.3 37.5% 24
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 3.8% 50.0% 15.4% 3.8% 4.0 26.9% 26
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.8% 53.8% 19.2% 4.0 23.1% 26
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 11.5% 57.7% 3.8% 11.5% 4.0 15.4% 26
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 11.5% 57.7% 15.4% 3.9 15.4% 26
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16236
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6083: Principles of Database Systems
Response Rate: 26/33Primary Instructor: Strauss,Fred J.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 25
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 4.2% 95.8% 24
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 3.8% 46.2% 3.8% 7.7% 4.2 38.5% 26
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 3.8% 42.3% 3.8% 7.7% 7.7% 4.1 34.6% 26
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 11.5% 42.3% 3.8% 7.7% 11.5% 3.8 23.1% 26
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 3.8% 61.5% 3.8% 3.8% 7.7% 4.4 19.2% 26
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 7.7% 42.3% 3.8% 3.8% 4.1 42.3% 26
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 3.8% 34.6% 3.8% 3.8% 7.7% 4.1 46.2% 26
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 3.8% 53.8% 3.8% 3.8% 4.4 34.6% 26
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.8% 57.7% 3.8% 3.8% 4.4 30.8% 26
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 7.7% 38.5% 3.8% 11.5% 7.7% 3.8 30.8% 26
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 3.8% 57.7% 3.8% 4.5 34.6% 26
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16233
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6003: Foundations of Computer Science
Response Rate: 36/46Primary Instructor: Morarescu,Paul
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 5.6% 94.4% 36
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 94.3% 5.7% 35
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 2.8% 44.4% 5.6% 8.3% 4.2 38.9% 36
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 2.8% 27.8% 2.8% 5.6% 25.0% 3.8 36.1% 36
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 48.6% 11.4% 8.6% 4.2 31.4% 35
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 3.0% 45.5% 3.0% 9.1% 9.1% 4.1 30.3% 33
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 8.3% 25.0% 5.6% 25.0% 3.6 36.1% 36
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 2.8% 55.6% 11.1% 2.8% 4.2 27.8% 36
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 13.9% 30.6% 16.7% 19.4% 3.4 19.4% 36
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 2.8% 30.6% 11.1% 13.9% 3.9 41.7% 36
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 11.1% 33.3% 8.3% 22.2% 3.6 25.0% 36
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 13.9% 36.1% 11.1% 16.7% 3.6 22.2% 36
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: ALEC
Class Number: 17591
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 2314: Discrete Mathematics
Response Rate: 24/49Primary Instructor: Morarescu,Paul
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 8.3% 91.7% 24
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 8.3% 87.5% 4.2% 24
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 50.0% 4.2% 4.2% 4.4 41.7% 24
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 20.8% 4.2% 41.7% 3.7 33.3% 24
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.2% 25.0% 20.8% 8.3% 3.6 41.7% 24
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 20.8% 4.2% 16.7% 16.7% 3.7 41.7% 24
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 8.3% 12.5% 20.8% 20.8% 3.3 37.5% 24
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 29.2% 4.2% 20.8% 4.1 45.8% 24
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
8.3% 4.2% 8.3% 12.5% 58.3% 2.9 8.3% 24
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 33.3% 16.7% 41.7% 2.3 8.3% 24
Q29 I need more HW problems. 4.2% 41.7% 4.2% 4.2% 20.8% 4.0 25.0% 24
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 8.3% 25.0% 4.2% 29.2% 12.5% 3.3 20.8% 24
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.2% 20.8% 25.0% 12.5% 3.5 37.5% 24
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 8.3% 20.8% 4.2% 29.2% 3.6 37.5% 24
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 8.3% 8.3% 25.0% 20.8% 3.1 37.5% 24
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: BLEC
Class Number: 23135
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 2314: Discrete Mathematics
Response Rate: 36/48Primary Instructor: Morarescu,Paul
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 5.6% 94.4% 36
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 2.8% 91.7% 5.6% 36
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 2.8% 25.0% 13.9% 11.1% 3.8 47.2% 36
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 13.9% 16.7% 22.2% 27.8% 3.0 19.4% 36
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 27.8% 5.6% 19.4% 8.3% 2.8 38.9% 36
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 25.0% 11.1% 22.2% 19.4% 2.7 22.2% 36
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 19.4% 8.3% 22.2% 13.9% 2.9 36.1% 36
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 13.9% 22.2% 2.8% 19.4% 11.1% 3.3 30.6% 36
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
20.0% 2.9% 22.9% 37.1% 2.6 17.1% 35
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 42.9% 5.7% 8.6% 40.0% 2.0 2.9% 35
Q29 I need more HW problems. 5.7% 37.1% 8.6% 20.0% 3.8 28.6% 35
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 30.6% 5.6% 19.4% 19.4% 2.6 25.0% 36
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 25.0% 8.3% 5.6% 19.4% 3.0 41.7% 36
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 25.0% 2.8% 22.2% 25.0% 2.6 25.0% 36
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 30.6% 2.8% 13.9% 25.0% 2.6 27.8% 36
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: ALEC
Class Number: 17313
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 1004: General Chemistry for Engineers
Response Rate: 31/53Primary Instructor: Hagver,Rena
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 32.3% 64.5% 3.2% 31
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 19.4% 71.0% 9.7% 31
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 61.3% 3.2% 6.5% 4.5 29.0% 31
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 3.2% 38.7% 6.5% 3.2% 22.6% 4.0 25.8% 31
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 19.4% 32.3% 3.2% 3.2% 25.8% 3.4 16.1% 31
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 12.9% 32.3% 3.2% 12.9% 16.1% 3.5 22.6% 31
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 9.7% 29.0% 3.2% 12.9% 16.1% 3.6 29.0% 31
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 9.7% 38.7% 3.2% 9.7% 9.7% 3.8 29.0% 31
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 In this course we gained a basic background in general chemistry. 48.4% 3.2% 12.9% 3.2% 4.2 32.3% 31
Q28 In this course we obtained a basic understanding of atomic and molecular structure
and their relationship to the properties of materials.
41.9% 3.2% 12.9% 3.2% 4.1 38.7% 31
Q29 In this course we obtained hands-on laboratory experience with experimental
techniques, chemical principles and materials.
41.9% 3.2% 9.7% 3.2% 4.2 41.9% 31
Q30 We found the electronic homework assignments to be a useful tool in learning
chemistry.
19.4% 19.4% 3.2% 12.9% 12.9% 3.2 32.3% 31
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 9.7% 32.3% 3.2% 16.1% 19.4% 3.5 19.4% 31
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 12.9% 25.8% 6.5% 16.1% 12.9% 3.4 25.8% 31
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 51.6% 6.5% 9.7% 9.7% 4.2 22.6% 31
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 19.4% 38.7% 3.2% 12.9% 12.9% 3.4 12.9% 31
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 12.9% 38.7% 3.2% 9.7% 9.7% 3.7 25.8% 31
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
9.7% 35.5% 3.2% 9.7% 9.7% 3.8 32.3% 31
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 22.6% 35.5% 3.2% 3.2% 12.9% 3.5 22.6% 31
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 17234
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 2221: ORGANIC CHEMISTRY LABORATORY II
Response Rate: 11/12Primary Instructor: Hagver,Rena
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
9.1% 81.8% 4.5 9.1% 11
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 9.1% 27.3% 18.2% 9.1% 3.5 36.4% 11
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 9.1% 81.8% 4.5 9.1% 11
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 9.1% 81.8% 4.5 9.1% 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 9.1% 63.6% 4.4 27.3% 11
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 9.1% 54.5% 4.3 36.4% 11
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 9.1% 63.6% 4.4 27.3% 11
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 9.1% 72.7% 4.5 18.2% 11
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 9.1% 63.6% 4.4 27.3% 11
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 9.1% 81.8% 4.5 9.1% 11
Q40 Value was added to my education. 9.1% 63.6% 4.4 27.3% 11
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 9.1% 63.6% 9.1% 4.3 18.2% 11
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 9.1% 63.6% 4.4 27.3% 11
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
9.1% 63.6% 4.4 27.3% 11
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 9.1% 63.6% 4.4 27.3% 11
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: B2
Class Number: 23924
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 2221: ORGANIC CHEMISTRY LABORATORY II
Response Rate: 9/11Primary Instructor: Hagver,Rena
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 11.1% 44.4% 11.1% 11.1% 3.8 22.2% 9
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 9
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 66.7% 11.1% 4.6 22.2% 9
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 66.7% 11.1% 11.1% 4.3 11.1% 9
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 77.8% 11.1% 4.6 11.1% 9
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 11.1% 4.6 22.2% 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 44.4% 22.2% 4.2 33.3% 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 9
Q40 Value was added to my education. 11.1% 88.9% 4.6 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 11.1% 44.4% 4.1 44.4% 9
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 11.1% 44.4% 11.1% 4.0 33.3% 9
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
11.1% 77.8% 4.4 11.1% 9
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 11.1% 44.4% 4.1 44.4% 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: A1LB
Class Number: 17109
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 3514: Analytical Chemistry
Response Rate: 17/20Primary Instructor: Hagver,Rena
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
5.9% 52.9% 4.4 41.2% 17
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 35.3% 23.5% 5.9% 3.8 35.3% 17
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 58.8% 5.9% 4.5 35.3% 17
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 76.5% 5.9% 4.6 17.6% 17
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 23.5% 5.9% 17.6% 5.9% 2.9 47.1% 17
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 5.9% 41.2% 5.9% 5.9% 4.1 41.2% 17
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 29.4% 17.6% 17.6% 5.9% 2.9 29.4% 17
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 29.4% 5.9% 11.8% 23.5% 2.7 29.4% 17
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 23.5% 5.9% 35.3% 5.9% 2.6 29.4% 17
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 5.9% 76.5% 5.9% 4.5 11.8% 17
Q40 Value was added to my education. 17.6% 23.5% 17.6% 3.4 41.2% 17
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 41.2% 11.8% 5.9% 5.9% 2.7 35.3% 17
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: A3LB
Class Number: 17686
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BMS 1004: Introduction to Cell and Molecular Biology
Response Rate: 13/15Primary Instructor: Li,Zairong
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
92.3% 4.9 7.7% 13
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 76.9% 7.7% 4.7 15.4% 13
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 13
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 13
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 7.7% 69.2% 7.7% 4.4 15.4% 13
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 84.6% 4.8 15.4% 13
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 84.6% 7.7% 4.8 7.7% 13
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 69.2% 7.7% 7.7% 4.5 15.4% 13
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 69.2% 23.1% 4.2 7.7% 13
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 92.3% 4.9 7.7% 13
Q40 Value was added to my education. 76.9% 7.7% 4.7 15.4% 13
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 15.4% 61.5% 23.1% 3.7 13
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 61.5% 4.6 38.5% 13
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
76.9% 7.7% 4.7 15.4% 13
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 76.9% 4.8 23.1% 13
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: B3LB
Class Number: 17691
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
BMS 1004: Introduction to Cell and Molecular Biology
Response Rate: 14/15Primary Instructor: Li,Zairong
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
92.9% 4.9 7.1% 14
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 71.4% 14.3% 4.4 14.3% 14
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 14
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 7.1% 57.1% 7.1% 7.1% 4.1 21.4% 14
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 78.6% 4.8 21.4% 14
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 28.6% 4.2 21.4% 14
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 35.7% 7.1% 4.2 57.1% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 14
Q40 Value was added to my education. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 14.3% 4.4 35.7% 14
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 64.3% 4.6 35.7% 14
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
64.3% 4.6 35.7% 14
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 64.3% 4.6 35.7% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: EXEC
Class Number: 23274
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 8703: Managing and Leading in the 21st Century
Response Rate: 14/15Primary Instructor: Lombardi,Francis J
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 14
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 14
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 14
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 14
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 78.6% 7.1% 7.1% 4.8 7.1% 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 14
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 14
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 85.7% 7.1% 4.8 7.1% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 14
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16203
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6263: Human Resource Information Systems
Response Rate: 10/11Primary Instructor: Reilly,John
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 80.0% 20.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 10
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 10.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 30.0% 10.0% 4.1 60.0% 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 70.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.4 10.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 70.0% 10.0% 4.6 20.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 10
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 30.0% 10.0% 4.2 60.0% 10
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
60.0% 4.6 40.0% 10
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
40.0% 10.0% 20.0% 4.0 30.0% 10
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
40.0% 10.0% 4.3 50.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 70.0% 20.0% 4.3 10.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 10.0% 80.0% 4.5 10.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 70.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.7 10.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 60.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.6 20.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LVL1
Class Number: 16768
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6263: Human Resource Information Systems
Response Rate: 3/6Primary Instructor: Reilly,John
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 3
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 3
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 33.3% 33.3% 3.3 33.3% 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 33.3% 3.3 66.7% 3
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
33.3% 33.3% 3.3 33.3% 3
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 4.0 100.0% 3
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 33.3% 3.7 66.7% 3
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 33.3% 33.3% 4.0 33.3% 3
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 33.3% 33.3% 3.0 33.3% 3
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LVL1
Class Number: 16768
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6263: Human Resource Information Systems
Response Rate: 3/6Primary Instructor: Reilly,John
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17701
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 4753: Application Security
Response Rate: 20/45Primary Instructor: Lum,Kelly A
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 5.0% 95.0% 20
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.0% 90.0% 5.0% 20
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 5.0% 60.0% 10.0% 4.3 25.0% 20
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 5.0% 70.0% 5.0% 5.0% 4.4 15.0% 20
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 20.0% 30.0% 10.0% 3.5 40.0% 20
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 65.0% 10.0% 4.5 25.0% 20
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 10.0% 50.0% 5.0% 5.0% 4.1 30.0% 20
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 5.0% 40.0% 5.0% 20.0% 4.0 30.0% 20
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 5.0% 40.0% 5.0% 5.0% 4.1 45.0% 20
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 5.0% 55.0% 10.0% 4.2 30.0% 20
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 10.0% 65.0% 5.0% 10.0% 4.2 10.0% 20
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 10.0% 65.0% 15.0% 4.2 10.0% 20
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16617
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 9163: Application Security
Response Rate: 18/25Primary Instructor: Lum,Kelly A
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 18
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 18
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 72.2% 5.6% 5.6% 4.6 16.7% 18
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 77.8% 5.6% 5.6% 4.6 11.1% 18
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 18
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 72.2% 4.7 27.8% 18
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 61.1% 11.1% 4.4 27.8% 18
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 55.6% 11.1% 5.6% 4.3 27.8% 18
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 76.5% 11.8% 4.5 11.8% 17
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 52.9% 5.9% 5.9% 4.4 35.3% 17
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
52.9% 5.9% 11.8% 4.3 29.4% 17
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 5.9% 58.8% 5.9% 5.9% 4.2 23.5% 17
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
64.7% 5.9% 4.6 29.4% 17
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 76.5% 5.9% 4.7 17.6% 17
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 70.6% 11.8% 4.6 17.6% 17
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 35.3% 5.9% 58.8% 3.8 17
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 23.5% 5.9% 58.8% 3.5 11.8% 17
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 23.5% 5.9% 64.7% 3.6 5.9% 17
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 11.8% 47.1% 29.4% 3.8 11.8% 17
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 11.8% 35.3% 5.9% 47.1% 3.5 17
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 5.9% 41.2% 5.9% 4.2 47.1% 17
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 5.6% 77.8% 5.6% 4.5 11.1% 18
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 5.6% 61.1% 5.6% 5.6% 4.3 22.2% 18
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 72.2% 5.6% 5.6% 4.6 16.7% 18
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16973
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 9163: Application Security
Response Rate: 20/45Primary Instructor: Lum,Kelly A
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 5.0% 95.0% 20
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.0% 90.0% 5.0% 20
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 5.0% 60.0% 10.0% 4.3 25.0% 20
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 5.0% 70.0% 5.0% 5.0% 4.4 15.0% 20
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 20.0% 30.0% 10.0% 3.5 40.0% 20
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 65.0% 10.0% 4.5 25.0% 20
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 10.0% 50.0% 5.0% 5.0% 4.1 30.0% 20
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 5.0% 40.0% 5.0% 20.0% 4.0 30.0% 20
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 5.0% 40.0% 5.0% 5.0% 4.1 45.0% 20
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 5.0% 55.0% 10.0% 4.2 30.0% 20
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 10.0% 65.0% 5.0% 10.0% 4.2 10.0% 20
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 10.0% 65.0% 15.0% 4.2 10.0% 20
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17120
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 2213: Statics
Response Rate: 62/58Primary Instructor: Park,Kee Moon
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 3.2% 93.5% 3.2% 62
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 60
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.6% 3.2% 4.8 16.1% 62
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 80.6% 6.5% 4.7 12.9% 62
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 96.8% 5.0 3.2% 62
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 80.6% 4.8 19.4% 62
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 67.7% 6.5% 4.6 25.8% 62
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 61.3% 3.2% 16.1% 4.5 19.4% 62
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learned algebra of vectors 86.2% 3.4% 4.8 10.3% 58
Q28 Learned about particle and rigid body equilibrium in two and three dimensions 86.2% 3.4% 4.8 10.3% 58
Q29 Learned how to carry out equilibrium analysis of structures; trusses, frames,
&beams
86.2% 3.4% 4.8 10.3% 58
Q30 Learned about friction and the method of virtual work 82.8% 3.4% 4.8 13.8% 58
Q31 Learned about the need for life-long learning 3.4% 58.6% 3.4% 3.4% 10.3% 4.3 20.7% 58
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 54.8% 6.5% 4.5 38.7% 62
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 71.0% 3.2% 4.6 25.8% 62
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 71.0% 6.5% 4.6 22.6% 62
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 58.1% 3.2% 9.7% 4.4 29.0% 62
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 69.0% 3.4% 3.4% 4.6 24.1% 58
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 69.0% 6.9% 4.6 24.1% 58
A41 I have enhanced my ability to recognize the need for, and an ability to engage in
life-long learning
62.1% 6.9% 6.9% 4.4 24.1% 58
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 17298
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
ME 3233: Machine Design
Response Rate: 28/42Primary Instructor: Park,Kee Moon
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 28
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 28
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 28
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 67.9% 3.6% 7.1% 4.6 21.4% 28
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 75.0% 3.6% 4.7 21.4% 28
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 78.6% 4.8 21.4% 28
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 75.0% 3.6% 4.7 21.4% 28
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 75.0% 3.6% 4.7 21.4% 28
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Learned the concepts on stress, strain, elastic and plastic ranges of material
behavior, stress-strain relationship, and engineering materials
77.8% 4.8 22.2% 27
Q28 Learned static failure theories for ductile and brittle materials 74.1% 3.7% 4.7 22.2% 27
Q29 Learned about application of static and dynamics failure theories to mechanical
design problems
74.1% 3.7% 4.7 22.2% 27
Q30 Learned about the fundamentals of machine elements, such as columns, shafts,
gears, and bearings
74.1% 7.4% 3.7% 4.6 14.8% 27
Q31 Learned how to design mechanical systems based on a set of requirements 70.4% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 4.6 18.5% 27
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 67.9% 7.1% 7.1% 4.5 17.9% 28
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 60.7% 3.6% 3.6% 4.6 32.1% 28
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 28
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 71.4% 3.6% 3.6% 4.6 21.4% 28
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 77.8% 3.7% 4.7 18.5% 27
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
77.8% 7.4% 4.7 14.8% 27
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 74.1% 3.7% 4.7 22.2% 27
A48 I have enhanced my ability to apply principles of engineering, basic science, and
mathematics (including multivariate calculus and differential equations) to model,
analyze, design, and realize physical systems, components or processes
74.1% 4.7 25.9% 27
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 22459
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 3404: Fundamentals of Communication Theory
Response Rate: 35/45Primary Instructor: Rangan,Sundeep
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 35
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.9% 91.2% 2.9% 34
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 35
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 68.6% 2.9% 5.7% 4.6 22.9% 35
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 2.9% 17.1% 22.9% 20.0% 3.4 37.1% 35
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 2.9% 51.4% 8.6% 4.3 37.1% 35
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 2.9% 34.3% 8.6% 5.7% 4.0 48.6% 35
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 14.3% 22.9% 5.7% 28.6% 14.3% 3.0 14.3% 35
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 2.9% 34.3% 2.9% 14.3% 4.1 45.7% 35
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 54.3% 5.7% 2.9% 4.4 37.1% 35
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 60.0% 2.9% 11.4% 4.4 25.7% 35
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 45.7% 2.9% 11.4% 4.3 40.0% 35
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: BK03
Class Number: 22137
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 3943: SPECIAL TOPICS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE
Response Rate: 32/43Primary Instructor: Bertini,Enrico
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 3.2% 96.8% 31
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 3.2% 96.8% 31
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 3.1% 90.6% 4.8 6.3% 32
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 84.4% 3.1% 9.4% 4.7 3.1% 32
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 3.1% 46.9% 25.0% 3.9 25.0% 32
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 71.0% 6.5% 9.7% 4.5 12.9% 31
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 65.6% 6.3% 3.1% 4.5 25.0% 32
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 3.1% 68.8% 3.1% 9.4% 4.4 15.6% 32
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 3.1% 65.6% 6.3% 4.4 25.0% 32
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 68.8% 3.1% 6.3% 4.6 21.9% 32
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 3.1% 71.9% 6.3% 4.6 18.8% 32
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 3.1% 65.6% 3.1% 4.5 28.1% 32
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16945
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6313: INFORMATION VISUALIZATION
Response Rate: 32/43Primary Instructor: Bertini,Enrico
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 3.2% 96.8% 31
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 3.2% 96.8% 31
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 3.1% 90.6% 4.8 6.3% 32
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 84.4% 3.1% 9.4% 4.7 3.1% 32
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 3.1% 46.9% 25.0% 3.9 25.0% 32
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 71.0% 6.5% 9.7% 4.5 12.9% 31
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 65.6% 6.3% 3.1% 4.5 25.0% 32
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 3.1% 68.8% 3.1% 9.4% 4.4 15.6% 32
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 3.1% 65.6% 6.3% 4.4 25.0% 32
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 68.8% 3.1% 6.3% 4.6 21.9% 32
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 3.1% 71.9% 6.3% 4.6 18.8% 32
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 3.1% 65.6% 3.1% 4.5 28.1% 32
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16969
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6313: INFORMATION VISUALIZATION
Response Rate: 19/30Primary Instructor: Bertini,Enrico
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 19
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 19
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 5.3% 73.7% 5.3% 4.5 15.8% 19
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 5.3% 52.6% 21.1% 4.2 21.1% 19
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 5.3% 26.3% 5.3% 15.8% 3.8 47.4% 19
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 42.1% 5.3% 5.3% 15.8% 4.2 31.6% 19
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 5.3% 47.4% 10.5% 10.5% 4.0 26.3% 19
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 5.3% 57.9% 5.3% 5.3% 4.3 26.3% 19
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 5.3% 52.6% 4.4 42.1% 19
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 5.3% 73.7% 5.3% 4.5 15.8% 19
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
5.3% 57.9% 15.8% 4.3 21.1% 19
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 5.3% 36.8% 26.3% 3.9 31.6% 19
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
5.3% 47.4% 5.3% 10.5% 4.1 31.6% 19
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 5.3% 36.8% 5.3% 21.1% 3.9 31.6% 19
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 5.3% 42.1% 5.3% 10.5% 4.1 36.8% 19
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 5.3% 21.1% 10.5% 57.9% 3.4 5.3% 19
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 5.3% 15.8% 10.5% 63.2% 3.3 5.3% 19
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 5.3% 15.8% 10.5% 63.2% 3.3 5.3% 19
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 15.8% 31.6% 5.3% 15.8% 10.5% 3.4 21.1% 19
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 15.8% 31.6% 5.3% 15.8% 21.1% 3.3 10.5% 19
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 15.8% 31.6% 15.8% 3.5 36.8% 19
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 5.3% 52.6% 5.3% 15.8% 4.1 21.1% 19
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 5.3% 52.6% 21.1% 4.2 21.1% 19
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 5.3% 42.1% 21.1% 15.8% 3.7 15.8% 19
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 17040
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 1124: Calculus II for Engineers
Response Rate: 7/36Primary Instructor: Ulman,Hanna
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 7
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 7
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 14.3% 85.7% 4.4 7
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 14.3% 71.4% 4.3 14.3% 7
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 14.3% 28.6% 28.6% 3.3 28.6% 7
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 14.3% 42.9% 14.3% 3.7 28.6% 7
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 28.6% 14.3% 14.3% 3.9 42.9% 7
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 14.3% 14.3% 57.1% 3.3 14.3% 7
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
42.9% 28.6% 4.1 28.6% 7
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 28.6% 57.1% 2.6 14.3% 7
Q29 I need more HW problems. 28.6% 14.3% 57.1% 2.3 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 28.6% 14.3% 3.3 57.1% 7
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 57.1% 14.3% 14.3% 4.1 14.3% 7
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 14.3% 71.4% 4.3 14.3% 7
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 14.3% 57.1% 4.1 28.6% 7
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: K
Class Number: 17046
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 1324: Integrated Calculus I for Engineers
Response Rate: 3/24Primary Instructor: Ulman,Hanna
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 3
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 66.7% 33.3% 3
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 33.3% 33.3% 3.7 33.3% 3
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 33.3% 33.3% 4.0 33.3% 3
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 33.3% 33.3% 4.0 33.3% 3
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 66.7% 33.3% 2.3 3
Q29 I need more HW problems. 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 2.7 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 33.3% 3.7 33.3% 3
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 33.3% 33.3% 3.7 33.3% 3
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 66.7% 33.3% 4.0 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 33.3% 66.7% 3.7 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 23811
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FIN 4903: SPECIAL TOPICS IN FINANCE AND RISK ENGINEERING
Response Rate: 3/5Primary Instructor: Ivan,Mirela M
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 3
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 3
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 33.3% 4.3 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 33.3% 3.7 33.3% 3
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 16596
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6123: Financial Risk Management and Asset Pricing
Response Rate: 24/25Primary Instructor: Ivan,Mirela M
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 24
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 4.2% 91.7% 4.2% 24
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 79.2% 4.2% 4.2% 4.7 12.5% 24
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 66.7% 16.7% 4.5 16.7% 24
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.2% 29.2% 4.2% 12.5% 33.3% 3.6 16.7% 24
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 62.5% 4.2% 8.3% 4.6 25.0% 24
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 79.2% 4.2% 4.8 16.7% 24
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 75.0% 4.2% 4.7 20.8% 24
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 62.5% 4.2% 12.5% 4.4 20.8% 24
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 24
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 75.0% 4.2% 4.2% 4.6 16.7% 24
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 70.8% 8.3% 4.6 20.8% 24
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: ALEC
Class Number: 17336
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 2213: ORGANIC CHEMISTRY I
Response Rate: 5/10Primary Instructor: Green,Mark M
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 5
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 80.0% 20.0% 4.6 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 5
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 40.0% 20.0% 4.2 40.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: ALEC
Class Number: 17105
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 2223: ORGANIC CHEMISTRY II
Response Rate: 26/102Primary Instructor: Green,Mark M
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 19.2% 73.1% 7.7% 26
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 46.2% 53.8% 26
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 61.5% 4.6 38.5% 26
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 4.0% 44.0% 4.0% 8.0% 16.0% 4.0 24.0% 25
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 53.8% 11.5% 15.4% 4.2 19.2% 26
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 7.7% 26.9% 23.1% 19.2% 3.4 23.1% 26
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 3.8% 42.3% 15.4% 23.1% 3.8 15.4% 26
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 7.7% 46.2% 7.7% 4.2 38.5% 26
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 3.8% 42.3% 11.5% 19.2% 3.9 23.1% 26
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 7.7% 30.8% 11.5% 7.7% 3.8 42.3% 26
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 42.3% 19.2% 11.5% 3.9 26.9% 26
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 7.7% 34.6% 15.4% 19.2% 3.6 23.1% 26
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 15.4% 30.8% 11.5% 15.4% 3.5 26.9% 26
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17110
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 4011: INFORMATION SOURCES FOR THE CHEMICAL SCIENCES
Response Rate: 16/19Primary Instructor: Green,Mark M
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 60.0% 40.0% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 50.0% 50.0% 16
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 12.5% 18.8% 25.0% 3.5 43.8% 16
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 20.0% 6.7% 6.7% 33.3% 3.7 33.3% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 6.3% 12.5% 18.8% 31.3% 3.3 31.3% 16
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 12.5% 12.5% 31.3% 3.6 43.8% 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 6.3% 6.3% 6.3% 18.8% 31.3% 3.1 31.3% 16
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 12.5% 12.5% 75.0% 2.7 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 18.8% 6.3% 37.5% 3.8 37.5% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 31.3% 12.5% 6.3% 25.0% 2.8 25.0% 16
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 12.5% 25.0% 6.3% 6.3% 18.8% 3.5 31.3% 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 25.0% 12.5% 6.3% 12.5% 25.0% 2.8 18.8% 16
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16762
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 9093: Biometrics
Response Rate: 2/2Primary Instructor: Sutcu,Yagiz
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 2
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 2
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 50.0% 50.0% 3.5 2
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 2.5 50.0% 2
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 50.0% 3.5 2
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 3.0 50.0% 2
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 50.0% 50.0% 3.5 2
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
50.0% 50.0% 3.5 2
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 50.0% 50.0% 3.5 2
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
50.0% 50.0% 3.0 2
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 50.0% 50.0% 3.0 2
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 50.0% 50.0% 3.5 2
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 100.0% 3.0 2
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 100.0% 3.0 2
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 100.0% 3.0 2
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 50.0% 50.0% 1.0 2
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 50.0% 50.0% 1.0 2
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 3.0 50.0% 2
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 50.0% 3.0 2
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 50.0% 50.0% 3.5 2
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 50.0% 3.5 2
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16613
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 8263: Construction Cost Estimating
Response Rate: 29/31Primary Instructor: Meehan,Michael Patrick
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 3.6% 96.4% 28
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 27
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 58.6% 3.4% 3.4% 4.5 34.5% 29
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 67.9% 3.6% 3.6% 4.6 25.0% 28
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 69.0% 3.4% 3.4% 4.6 24.1% 29
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 69.0% 6.9% 4.6 24.1% 29
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 48.3% 6.9% 6.9% 4.3 37.9% 29
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 3.4% 58.6% 3.4% 4.4 34.5% 29
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 3.6% 39.3% 14.3% 4.0 42.9% 28
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 44.8% 13.8% 13.8% 4.0 27.6% 29
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 48.3% 17.2% 10.3% 4.0 24.1% 29
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 6.9% 48.3% 10.3% 10.3% 4.0 24.1% 29
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: BK01
Class Number: 22135
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 3943: SPECIAL TOPICS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE
Response Rate: 26/33Primary Instructor: Togelius,Julian
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 3.8% 92.3% 3.8% 26
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 11.5% 88.5% 26
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 84.6% 3.8% 4.8 11.5% 26
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 69.2% 7.7% 3.8% 4.5 19.2% 26
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 65.4% 3.8% 15.4% 4.4 15.4% 26
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 73.1% 3.8% 11.5% 4.5 11.5% 26
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 3.8% 65.4% 3.8% 4.5 26.9% 26
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 69.2% 7.7% 3.8% 11.5% 4.5 7.7% 26
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 7.7% 30.8% 7.7% 11.5% 3.8 42.3% 26
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.8% 80.8% 3.8% 4.6 11.5% 26
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 69.2% 7.7% 3.8% 4.5 19.2% 26
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 3.8% 69.2% 7.7% 7.7% 4.3 11.5% 26
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: G
Class Number: 17011
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 9223: SELECTED TOPICS IN CS
Response Rate: 26/33Primary Instructor: Togelius,Julian
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 3.8% 92.3% 3.8% 26
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 11.5% 88.5% 26
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 84.6% 3.8% 4.8 11.5% 26
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 69.2% 7.7% 3.8% 4.5 19.2% 26
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 65.4% 3.8% 15.4% 4.4 15.4% 26
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 73.1% 3.8% 11.5% 4.5 11.5% 26
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 3.8% 65.4% 3.8% 4.5 26.9% 26
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 69.2% 7.7% 3.8% 11.5% 4.5 7.7% 26
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 7.7% 30.8% 7.7% 11.5% 3.8 42.3% 26
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.8% 80.8% 3.8% 4.6 11.5% 26
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 69.2% 7.7% 3.8% 4.5 19.2% 26
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 3.8% 69.2% 7.7% 7.7% 4.3 11.5% 26
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: J4
Class Number: 16941
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 7801: TOPICS IN FINANCE AND FINANCIAL MARKETS I
Response Rate: 12/12Primary Instructor: Paul,Asha
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 12
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 12
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 91.7% 4.9 8.3% 12
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 91.7% 4.9 8.3% 12
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 12
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 91.7% 4.9 8.3% 12
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 12
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 12
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 12
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 12
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 91.7% 4.9 8.3% 12
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: EMT3
Class Number: 23874
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 9503: MOT Capstone Project Course
Response Rate: 32/33Primary Instructor: Ginsberg,Ari
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 3.1% 93.8% 3.1% 32
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 6.3% 90.6% 3.1% 32
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 75.0% 3.1% 3.1% 3.1% 4.7 15.6% 32
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 75.0% 3.1% 3.1% 4.7 18.8% 32
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 71.9% 3.1% 4.7 25.0% 32
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 71.9% 3.1% 3.1% 4.6 21.9% 32
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 3.1% 56.3% 3.1% 6.3% 4.3 31.3% 32
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 59.4% 3.1% 12.5% 4.4 25.0% 32
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 3.1% 46.9% 9.4% 15.6% 4.0 25.0% 32
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
3.1% 43.8% 6.3% 3.1% 4.2 43.8% 32
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
3.1% 46.9% 3.1% 3.1% 4.3 43.8% 32
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
3.1% 65.6% 6.3% 4.5 25.0% 32
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 46.9% 9.4% 12.5% 4.2 31.3% 32
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 56.3% 6.3% 3.1% 4.4 34.4% 32
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 3.1% 62.5% 6.3% 6.3% 4.3 21.9% 32
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 3.1% 56.3% 12.5% 12.5% 4.1 15.6% 32
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: G
Class Number: 17649
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 2034: Linear Algebra and Differential Equations
Response Rate: 2/23Primary Instructor: Sher,Abraham
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 2
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 2
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 2
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 2.0 2
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
50.0% 50.0% 3.0 2
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 100.0% 1.0 2
Q29 I need more HW problems. 50.0% 50.0% 1.5 2
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 2
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16333
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 7173: Enterprise Data Systems
Response Rate: 18/21Primary Instructor: Kannan,Raman
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 94.4% 5.6% 18
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 11.1% 88.9% 18
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 5.6% 50.0% 5.6% 4.3 38.9% 18
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 72.2% 11.1% 4.6 16.7% 18
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 55.6% 22.2% 5.6% 4.1 16.7% 18
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 11.1% 16.7% 4.1 22.2% 18
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 11.1% 38.9% 22.2% 11.1% 3.5 16.7% 18
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 11.1% 50.0% 16.7% 5.6% 3.8 16.7% 18
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 5.6% 50.0% 5.6% 4.2 38.9% 18
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
44.4% 16.7% 11.1% 4.0 27.8% 18
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
50.0% 16.7% 5.6% 4.1 27.8% 18
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
5.6% 55.6% 11.1% 4.2 27.8% 18
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 38.9% 22.2% 16.7% 3.8 22.2% 18
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 61.1% 5.6% 16.7% 4.3 16.7% 18
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 38.9% 16.7% 22.2% 3.8 22.2% 18
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 44.4% 11.1% 16.7% 4.1 27.8% 18
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16745
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6153: FOUNDATIONS OF FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY
Response Rate: 19/27Primary Instructor: Freedman,Roy
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 19
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 19
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 84.2% 4.8 15.8% 19
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 84.2% 4.8 15.8% 19
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 84.2% 4.8 15.8% 19
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 84.2% 4.8 15.8% 19
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 73.7% 4.7 26.3% 19
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 84.2% 4.8 15.8% 19
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 84.2% 4.8 15.8% 19
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 68.4% 5.3% 4.6 26.3% 19
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 63.2% 5.3% 4.5 31.6% 19
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 5.3% 63.2% 4.5 31.6% 19
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16595
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 7211: FORENSIC FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY AND REGULATORY SYSTEMS
Response Rate: 12/24Primary Instructor: Freedman,Roy
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
16.7% 66.7% 4.2 16.7% 12
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 8.3% 58.3% 8.3% 4.3 25.0% 12
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 8.3% 83.3% 4.6 8.3% 12
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 9.1% 72.7% 4.5 18.2% 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 8.3% 83.3% 4.6 8.3% 12
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 9.1% 81.8% 4.5 9.1% 11
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 8.3% 66.7% 4.4 25.0% 12
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 8.3% 66.7% 4.4 25.0% 12
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 8.3% 66.7% 4.4 25.0% 12
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 8.3% 91.7% 4.7 12
Q40 Value was added to my education. 8.3% 91.7% 4.7 12
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 8.3% 75.0% 4.5 16.7% 12
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 23252
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 7251: ALGORITHMIC TRADING & HIGH-FREQUENCY FINANCE
Response Rate: 17/22Primary Instructor: Freedman,Roy
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
76.5% 4.8 23.5% 17
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 70.6% 5.9% 4.8 23.5% 17
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 76.5% 4.8 23.5% 17
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 70.6% 4.7 29.4% 17
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 70.6% 5.9% 4.6 23.5% 17
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 64.7% 4.6 35.3% 17
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 58.8% 4.6 41.2% 17
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 58.8% 4.6 41.2% 17
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 70.6% 4.7 29.4% 17
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 70.6% 4.7 29.4% 17
Q40 Value was added to my education. 64.7% 5.9% 4.6 29.4% 17
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 64.7% 4.6 35.3% 17
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16940
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 7261: NEWS ANALYTICS & STRATEGIES
Response Rate: 20/23Primary Instructor: Freedman,Roy
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 5.0% 95.0% 20
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.3% 89.5% 5.3% 19
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.0% 5.0% 4.8 10.0% 20
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 89.5% 4.9 10.5% 19
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 85.0% 5.0% 4.8 10.0% 20
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 90.0% 5.0% 4.8 5.0% 20
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 75.0% 10.0% 4.7 15.0% 20
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 65.0% 5.0% 4.6 30.0% 20
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 70.0% 5.0% 4.7 25.0% 20
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 70.0% 5.0% 4.7 25.0% 20
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 80.0% 5.0% 4.8 15.0% 20
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 70.0% 5.0% 4.7 25.0% 20
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17282
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 2204: DIGITAL LOGIC AND STATE MACHINE DESIGN
Response Rate: 52/69Primary Instructor: Hadimioglu,Haldun
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 51
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 51
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 96.1% 5.0 3.9% 51
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 80.0% 2.0% 4.0% 4.8 14.0% 50
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 66.7% 3.9% 3.9% 4.5 25.5% 51
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 80.4% 2.0% 4.8 17.6% 51
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 74.5% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 4.7 19.6% 51
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 2.0% 60.8% 7.8% 13.7% 4.3 15.7% 51
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Understanding binary and hexadecimal number systems. 88.5% 4.9 11.5% 52
Q28 Ability to design and analyze combinational circuits by using switching algebra and
Karnaugh maps.
71.2% 1.9% 4.7 26.9% 52
Q29 Understanding sequential circuits and their analysis. 65.4% 1.9% 5.8% 4.6 26.9% 52
Q30 Ability to use the finite-state machine technique to design and analyze digital
systems
51.9% 1.9% 3.8% 4.4 42.3% 52
Q31 Ability to use programmable logic components and to analyze circuits with
programmable components.
53.8% 7.7% 4.5 38.5% 52
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 66.7% 2.0% 5.9% 4.6 25.5% 51
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 84.3% 2.0% 4.8 13.7% 51
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 94.1% 4.9 5.9% 51
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 2.0% 78.4% 2.0% 3.9% 4.6 13.7% 51
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A09 I have enhanced my ability to design a component or system to meet realistic
constraints.
65.4% 1.9% 1.9% 4.6 30.8% 52
A21 I have enhanced my ability to learn independently. 67.3% 1.9% 5.8% 4.6 25.0% 52
A22 I have enhanced my ability to continuously seek to acquire new knowledge 65.4% 1.9% 3.8% 4.6 28.8% 52
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 67.3% 1.9% 4.6 30.8% 52
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
67.3% 1.9% 5.8% 4.6 25.0% 52
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
76.9% 1.9% 3.8% 4.7 17.3% 52
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17282
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 2204: DIGITAL LOGIC AND STATE MACHINE DESIGN
Response Rate: 52/69Primary Instructor: Hadimioglu,Haldun
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
Y. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 78.8% 1.9% 4.8 19.2% 52
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 80.8% 3.8% 4.8 15.4% 52
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 74.5% 3.9% 4.7 21.6% 51
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
76.9% 1.9% 4.8 21.2% 52
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 78.8% 5.8% 4.7 15.4% 52
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 82.7% 3.8% 4.8 13.5% 52
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17287
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 2214: COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE AND ORGANIZATION
Response Rate: 59/96Primary Instructor: Hadimioglu,Haldun
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 59
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 57
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 96.6% 5.0 3.4% 58
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 1.7% 69.0% 1.7% 12.1% 4.5 15.5% 58
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 67.8% 3.4% 4.6 28.8% 59
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 66.1% 8.5% 4.6 25.4% 59
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 59.3% 5.1% 6.8% 4.4 28.8% 59
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 42.4% 11.9% 13.6% 4.1 32.2% 59
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 Ability to design and analyze computer architecture. 1.8% 48.2% 1.8% 3.6% 8.9% 4.3 35.7% 56
Q28 Ability to design and analyze an unpipelined central processing unit. 1.8% 50.0% 1.8% 3.6% 5.4% 4.3 37.5% 56
Q29 Understanding measuring computer performance. 60.7% 1.8% 7.1% 4.5 30.4% 56
Q30 Understanding pipelined central processing units. 1.8% 60.7% 1.8% 1.8% 5.4% 4.5 28.6% 56
Q31 Understanding a computer memory hierarchy. 64.3% 1.8% 8.9% 4.6 25.0% 56
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 1.7% 42.4% 5.1% 10.2% 4.2 40.7% 59
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 1.7% 54.2% 1.7% 8.5% 4.4 33.9% 59
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 76.3% 1.7% 6.8% 4.7 15.3% 59
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 3.4% 54.2% 3.4% 8.5% 4.3 30.5% 59
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A05 I have enhanced my ability to solve engineering problems. 1.8% 53.6% 1.8% 12.5% 4.4 30.4% 56
A09 I have enhanced my ability to design a component or system to meet realistic
constraints.
3.6% 50.0% 1.8% 1.8% 16.1% 4.2 26.8% 56
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
1.8% 46.4% 1.8% 1.8% 14.3% 4.2 33.9% 56
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 1.8% 48.2% 1.8% 1.8% 21.4% 4.2 25.0% 56
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16237
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6133: Computer Architecture I
Response Rate: 52/66Primary Instructor: Hadimioglu,Haldun
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 52
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 98.1% 1.9% 52
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 96.2% 1.9% 4.9 1.9% 52
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 1.9% 88.5% 1.9% 1.9% 4.8 5.8% 52
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 90.4% 1.9% 1.9% 4.8 5.8% 52
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 1.9% 88.5% 1.9% 4.8 7.7% 52
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 1.9% 84.6% 1.9% 4.8 11.5% 52
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 3.8% 82.7% 1.9% 3.8% 4.7 7.7% 52
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 82.7% 1.9% 1.9% 4.8 13.5% 52
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.8% 71.2% 1.9% 1.9% 4.6 21.2% 52
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 1.9% 90.4% 4.8 7.7% 52
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 1.9% 76.9% 1.9% 5.8% 4.7 13.5% 52
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 23724
Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering
CS 6643: Computer Vision and Scene Analysis
Response Rate: 27/30Primary Instructor: Gerig,Guido
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 27
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 27
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 81.5% 4.8 18.5% 27
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 27
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 27
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 92.6% 4.9 7.4% 27
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 85.2% 4.9 14.8% 27
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 74.1% 3.7% 4.7 22.2% 27
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 66.7% 7.4% 4.6 25.9% 27
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 88.9% 3.7% 4.9 7.4% 27
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 27
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 81.5% 3.7% 4.7 14.8% 27
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17542
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
URB 2234: NATURAL ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHES & CITIES
Response Rate: 12/14Primary Instructor: Schechtman,Judd
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 12
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 83.3% 16.7% 12
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 50.0% 8.3% 4.4 41.7% 12
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 41.7% 8.3% 16.7% 4.1 33.3% 12
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 8.3% 33.3% 16.7% 8.3% 3.7 33.3% 12
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 41.7% 41.7% 4.0 16.7% 12
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 33.3% 8.3% 8.3% 4.1 50.0% 12
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 33.3% 25.0% 25.0% 3.6 16.7% 12
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have enhanced my ability to effectively communicate including being able to give
oral presentations that increase knowledge, foster understanding, or encourage
change.
10.0% 40.0% 10.0% 4.0 40.0% 10
Q28 I have enhanced by ability to read effectively, including being able to extract and to
create meaning from the written texts.
10.0% 40.0% 10.0% 20.0% 3.7 20.0% 10
Q29 I developed perspectives of the humanities and social sciences to bear within
technical discourse.
50.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.2 30.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 16.7% 33.3% 8.3% 16.7% 3.5 25.0% 12
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 33.3% 8.3% 16.7% 4.0 41.7% 12
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 33.3% 16.7% 16.7% 3.8 33.3% 12
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 8.3% 33.3% 16.7% 8.3% 3.7 33.3% 12
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: B
Class Number: 23725
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
URB 3834W: SPECIAL TOPICS IN SUSTAINABLE URBAN ENVIRONMENTS
Response Rate: 8/9Primary Instructor: Schechtman,Judd
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 8
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 87.5% 12.5% 8
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 8
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 62.5% 12.5% 4.5 25.0% 8
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 3.8 62.5% 8
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 12.5% 12.5% 4.4 25.0% 8
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 12.5% 25.0% 12.5% 3.6 50.0% 8
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 37.5% 25.0% 12.5% 12.5% 4.0 12.5% 8
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 37.5% 25.0% 3.9 37.5% 8
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 62.5% 4.6 37.5% 8
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 62.5% 12.5% 4.5 25.0% 8
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 12.5% 4.4 37.5% 8
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16295
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6083: Quantitative Methods in Finance
Response Rate: 5/5Primary Instructor: Tourin,Agnes
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 4
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 5
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 80.0% 20.0% 4.6 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 23242
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6233: OPTIONS PRICING & STOCHASTIC CALCULUS
Response Rate: 24/30Primary Instructor: Tourin,Agnes
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 24
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 4.2% 95.8% 24
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 4.2% 91.7% 4.8 4.2% 24
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 4.2% 95.8% 4.8 24
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.2% 83.3% 4.2% 4.7 8.3% 24
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 4.2% 83.3% 4.2% 4.7 8.3% 24
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 4.2% 79.2% 4.7 16.7% 24
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.2% 79.2% 4.7 16.7% 24
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.2% 70.8% 4.2% 4.5 20.8% 24
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.2% 83.3% 4.7 12.5% 24
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 4.2% 87.5% 4.2% 4.7 4.2% 24
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.2% 91.7% 4.8 4.2% 24
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 23243
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6233: OPTIONS PRICING & STOCHASTIC CALCULUS
Response Rate: 17/16Primary Instructor: Tourin,Agnes
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 17
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 17
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 82.4% 5.9% 4.8 11.8% 17
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 5.9% 88.2% 4.7 5.9% 17
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 5.9% 58.8% 5.9% 5.9% 4.2 23.5% 17
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 47.1% 23.5% 5.9% 3.9 23.5% 17
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 82.4% 17.6% 4.6 17
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 88.2% 5.9% 4.8 5.9% 17
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 70.6% 11.8% 4.6 17.6% 17
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 70.6% 5.9% 4.6 23.5% 17
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 76.5% 11.8% 4.5 11.8% 17
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 82.4% 5.9% 5.9% 4.6 5.9% 17
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 24342
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 9183: SEL TOPCS IN SIGNAL PROCESSING
Response Rate: 11/14Primary Instructor: Fang,Yi
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 90.9% 9.1% 11
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 90.9% 9.1% 11
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 45.5% 4.5 54.5% 11
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 54.5% 9.1% 4.6 36.4% 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 54.5% 4.5 45.5% 11
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 72.7% 4.7 27.3% 11
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 9.1% 63.6% 4.4 27.3% 11
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 45.5% 9.1% 9.1% 4.2 36.4% 11
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 45.5% 18.2% 9.1% 4.0 27.3% 11
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 63.6% 9.1% 4.7 27.3% 11
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 63.6% 9.1% 9.1% 4.4 18.2% 11
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 72.7% 18.2% 4.4 9.1% 11
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16205
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6313: ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY & DESIGN
Response Rate: 7/8Primary Instructor: Grant,Sara
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 7
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 7
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 7
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
100.0% 5.0 6
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LVL1
Class Number: 16769
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6313: ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY & DESIGN
Response Rate: 3/7Primary Instructor: Grant,Sara
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 3
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 3
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
100.0% 5.0 3
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
33.3% 33.3% 4.0 33.3% 3
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
100.0% 5.0 3
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 100.0% 5.0 3
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 100.0% 5.0 3
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 33.3% 3.7 66.7% 3
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 4.0 100.0% 3
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 4.0 100.0% 3
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 100.0% 5.0 3
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 66.7% 33.3% 4.0 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LVL1
Class Number: 16769
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6313: ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY & DESIGN
Response Rate: 3/7Primary Instructor: Grant,Sara
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16287
Dept. of Interdisciplinary Studies
BI 7553: Bioinformatics III: Functional Prediction
Response Rate: 5/6Primary Instructor: Seto,Jeremy
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 5
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 40.0% 20.0% 4.2 40.0% 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 20.0% 40.0% 40.0% 3.0 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 40.0% 60.0% 3.8 5
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 20.0% 60.0% 20.0% 3.8 5
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 40.0% 20.0% 4.2 40.0% 5
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
20.0% 20.0% 4.0 60.0% 5
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 40.0% 40.0% 4.0 20.0% 5
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
20.0% 20.0% 3.8 60.0% 5
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 20.0% 4.2 80.0% 5
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 20.0% 20.0% 3.8 60.0% 5
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 20.0% 40.0% 3.5 40.0% 5
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 20.0% 40.0% 3.5 40.0% 5
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 20.0% 20.0% 40.0% 3.8 20.0% 5
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 40.0% 20.0% 4.2 40.0% 5
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 20.0% 20.0% 4.0 60.0% 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 20.0% 20.0% 3.8 60.0% 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17721
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
STS 3904: Special Topics in STS
Response Rate: 19/28Primary Instructor: Porfiri,Maurizio
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 19
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.6% 94.4% 18
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 57.9% 4.6 42.1% 19
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 31.6% 26.3% 4.1 42.1% 19
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 36.8% 5.3% 5.3% 31.6% 3.9 21.1% 19
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 5.3% 31.6% 15.8% 26.3% 3.6 21.1% 19
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 5.3% 31.6% 21.1% 3.7 42.1% 19
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 5.3% 21.1% 26.3% 26.3% 3.3 21.1% 19
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 22.2% 22.2% 33.3% 16.7% 2.7 5.6% 18
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 5.3% 31.6% 5.3% 5.3% 4.0 52.6% 19
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 5.3% 47.4% 5.3% 5.3% 10.5% 4.1 26.3% 19
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 5.3% 42.1% 5.3% 15.8% 5.3% 3.9 26.3% 19
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17027
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 2014: Operations Management
Response Rate: 25/36Primary Instructor: Cohen,Martin J
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 12.0% 80.0% 8.0% 25
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 92.0% 8.0% 25
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 48.0% 8.0% 8.0% 4.0% 4.3 32.0% 25
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 4.0% 64.0% 8.0% 4.0% 8.0% 4.4 12.0% 25
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 64.0% 8.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.6 20.0% 25
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 44.0% 8.0% 8.0% 16.0% 4.1 24.0% 25
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 4.0% 36.0% 8.0% 12.0% 8.0% 3.9 32.0% 25
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.2% 45.8% 8.3% 8.3% 12.5% 4.0 20.8% 24
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 4.5% 27.3% 4.5% 22.7% 3.8 40.9% 22
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
4.5% 27.3% 13.6% 9.1% 3.8 45.5% 22
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
22.7% 18.2% 13.6% 3.7 45.5% 22
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
4.5% 27.3% 4.5% 18.2% 3.9 45.5% 22
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 28.0% 12.0% 4.0% 8.0% 4.1 48.0% 25
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.0% 40.0% 8.0% 12.0% 4.0% 4.0 32.0% 25
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 4.0% 40.0% 8.0% 12.0% 8.0% 4.0 28.0% 25
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.0% 40.0% 8.0% 8.0% 12.0% 4.0 28.0% 25
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: B3RC
Class Number: 17065
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 1013: MECHANICS
Response Rate: 20/25Primary Instructor: Chowdhury,Saumitra
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 45.0% 5.0% 5.0% 4.3 45.0% 20
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
10.0% 5.0% 40.0% 3.6 45.0% 20
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 30.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.7 30.0% 20
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 25.0% 5.0% 5.0% 30.0% 3.8 35.0% 20
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: B3RC
Class Number: 17217
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2023: ELECTRICITY, MAGNETISM, & FLUIDS
Response Rate: 23/28Primary Instructor: Chowdhury,Saumitra
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
X. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 30.4% 13.0% 17.4% 8.7% 2.8 30.4% 23
R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of
class hours.
13.0% 13.0% 26.1% 34.8% 2.9 13.0% 23
R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 17.4% 13.0% 26.1% 26.1% 2.8 17.4% 23
R41 Overall, I would recommend this recitation instructor to other students. 34.8% 13.0% 13.0% 34.8% 2.5 4.3% 23
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: E
Class Number: 17557
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2121: General Physics Laboratory I
Response Rate: 27/30Primary Instructor: Chowdhury,Saumitra
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
3.7% 51.9% 7.4% 7.4% 4.2 29.6% 27
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 3.7% 33.3% 3.7% 7.4% 4.2 51.9% 27
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 7.4% 40.7% 14.8% 7.4% 3.8 29.6% 27
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 14.8% 25.9% 3.7% 11.1% 22.2% 3.3 22.2% 27
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 11.1% 7.4% 3.7% 29.6% 25.9% 2.8 22.2% 27
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 37.0% 3.7% 37.0% 18.5% 2.0 3.7% 27
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 3.7% 18.5% 7.4% 33.3% 3.6 37.0% 27
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 3.7% 22.2% 3.7% 11.1% 25.9% 3.6 33.3% 27
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 18.5% 22.2% 14.8% 14.8% 3.2 29.6% 27
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 29.6% 3.7% 3.7% 14.8% 29.6% 2.5 18.5% 27
Q40 Value was added to my education. 18.5% 7.4% 11.1% 25.9% 3.0 37.0% 27
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 29.6% 7.4% 29.6% 14.8% 2.4 18.5% 27
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A06 I have enhanced my ability to analyze and interpret data appropriately. 7.4% 14.8% 11.1% 11.1% 3.6 55.6% 27
A17 I have enhanced my ability to conduct experiments to validate hypotheses and
theories.
7.4% 25.9% 14.8% 14.8% 3.6 37.0% 27
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 21623
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 2183: Contemporary Techniques in Digital Photography and Imaging
Response Rate: 14/18Primary Instructor: Toolin,Jack Craig
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 7.1% 92.9% 14
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 23.1% 76.9% 13
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 78.6% 7.1% 7.1% 4.6 7.1% 14
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 14.3% 7.1% 4.1 28.6% 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 42.9% 21.4% 7.1% 3.9 28.6% 14
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 57.1% 14.3% 4.3 28.6% 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 42.9% 7.1% 21.4% 4.1 28.6% 14
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 21.4% 7.1% 14.3% 21.4% 3.7 35.7% 14
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 21.4% 7.1% 4.1 71.4% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 42.9% 7.1% 14.3% 4.1 35.7% 14
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 42.9% 7.1% 14.3% 4.1 35.7% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 42.9% 14.3% 7.1% 4.1 35.7% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17078
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 1002: Introduction to Civil Engineering
Response Rate: 28/30Primary Instructor: Ronan,Anne D
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 3.6% 92.9% 3.6% 28
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 14.3% 82.1% 3.6% 28
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 85.7% 3.6% 4.8 10.7% 28
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 67.9% 14.3% 7.1% 4.3 10.7% 28
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 7.1% 53.6% 7.1% 3.6% 4.1 28.6% 28
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 10.7% 46.4% 3.6% 3.6% 4.0 35.7% 28
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 3.6% 64.3% 3.6% 3.6% 4.4 25.0% 28
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 46.4% 3.6% 25.0% 4.1 25.0% 28
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I now have a thorough understanding of the sub-disciplines of civil engineering and
professional roles of civil engineers.
71.4% 4.7 28.6% 28
Q28 I now have an understanding of the importance of professional ethics, and the
many ways it impacts the profession, its practice, and society in general.
57.1% 4.6 42.9% 28
Q29 I have gained an understanding of the different types of roles and employers that
civil engineers may be engaged in the profession.
60.7% 3.6% 4.6 35.7% 28
Q30 I developed computational and communication skills. 46.4% 14.3% 10.7% 4.1 28.6% 28
Q31 I now have a general understanding of the fundamental concepts of GIS and
AutoCAD.
71.4% 3.6% 4.7 25.0% 28
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 10.7% 25.0% 3.6% 17.9% 3.7 42.9% 28
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.6% 53.6% 7.1% 10.7% 4.2 25.0% 28
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 3.6% 53.6% 10.7% 3.6% 4.2 28.6% 28
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 14.3% 53.6% 7.1% 7.1% 3.9 17.9% 28
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A38 I have enhanced my ability to develop an understanding of professional and ethical
responsibility
53.6% 3.6% 7.1% 4.4 35.7% 28
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 39.3% 10.7% 14.3% 4.0 35.7% 28
A40 I have enhanced my ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
global and societal context
50.0% 3.6% 7.1% 4.4 39.3% 28
A41 I have enhanced my ability to develop a recognition of the need for, and an ability
to engage in life-long learning
3.6% 53.6% 3.6% 10.7% 4.3 28.6% 28
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: ALAB
Class Number: 17079
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 1002: Introduction to Civil Engineering
Response Rate: 16/19Primary Instructor: Ronan,Anne D
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
68.8% 18.8% 4.5 12.5% 16
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 68.8% 12.5% 4.4 18.8% 16
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 81.3% 4.8 18.8% 16
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 93.8% 4.9 6.3% 16
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 62.5% 12.5% 4.4 25.0% 16
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 75.0% 12.5% 4.5 12.5% 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 62.5% 6.3% 6.3% 4.4 25.0% 16
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 25.0% 12.5% 31.3% 3.7 31.3% 16
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I now have a thorough understanding of the sub-disciplines of civil engineering and
professional roles of civil engineers.
68.8% 4.7 31.3% 16
Q28 I now have an understanding of the importance of professional ethics, and the
many ways it impacts the profession, its practice, and society in general.
56.3% 6.3% 4.5 37.5% 16
Q29 I have gained an understanding of the different types of roles and employers that
civil engineers may be engaged in the profession.
62.5% 4.6 37.5% 16
Q30 I developed computational and communication skills. 37.5% 6.3% 12.5% 4.1 43.8% 16
Q31 I now have a general understanding of the fundamental concepts of GIS and
AutoCAD.
68.8% 4.7 31.3% 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 6.3% 12.5% 4.3 31.3% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 68.8% 6.3% 4.6 25.0% 16
Q40 Value was added to my education. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 62.5% 12.5% 4.5 25.0% 16
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A38 I have enhanced my ability to develop an understanding of professional and ethical
responsibility
50.0% 12.5% 4.4 37.5% 16
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 6.3% 31.3% 12.5% 25.0% 3.6 25.0% 16
A40 I have enhanced my ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
global and societal context
37.5% 6.3% 12.5% 4.1 43.8% 16
A41 I have enhanced my ability to develop a recognition of the need for, and an ability
to engage in life-long learning
50.0% 6.3% 12.5% 4.3 31.3% 16
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: BLAB
Class Number: 17205
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 1002: Introduction to Civil Engineering
Response Rate: 11/11Primary Instructor: Ronan,Anne D
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
100.0% 5.0 11
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 63.6% 9.1% 4.5 27.3% 11
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 11
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 36.4% 18.2% 4.0 45.5% 11
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 11
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I now have a thorough understanding of the sub-disciplines of civil engineering and
professional roles of civil engineers.
81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
Q28 I now have an understanding of the importance of professional ethics, and the
many ways it impacts the profession, its practice, and society in general.
90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
Q29 I have gained an understanding of the different types of roles and employers that
civil engineers may be engaged in the profession.
72.7% 4.7 27.3% 11
Q30 I developed computational and communication skills. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
Q31 I now have a general understanding of the fundamental concepts of GIS and
AutoCAD.
90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 36.4% 27.3% 3.8 36.4% 11
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 72.7% 9.1% 4.6 18.2% 11
Q40 Value was added to my education. 63.6% 4.6 36.4% 11
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 45.5% 18.2% 18.2% 3.9 18.2% 11
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A38 I have enhanced my ability to develop an understanding of professional and ethical
responsibility
80.0% 4.8 20.0% 10
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 60.0% 10.0% 4.5 30.0% 10
A40 I have enhanced my ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
global and societal context
70.0% 4.7 30.0% 10
A41 I have enhanced my ability to develop a recognition of the need for, and an ability
to engage in life-long learning
80.0% 20.0% 4.6 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: ALAB
Class Number: 17244
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 2213: FLUID MECHANICS AND HYDRAULICS
Response Rate: 6/9Primary Instructor: Ronan,Anne D
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 3.2 33.3% 6
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 33.3% 16.7% 4.2 50.0% 6
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 66.7% 16.7% 1.8 16.7% 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 16.7% 33.3% 16.7% 3.5 33.3% 6
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 33.3% 16.7% 33.3% 16.7% 2.3 6
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an understanding of the nomenclature and standard units associated
with fluid mechanics as it relates to civil engineering and become adept in their use
in problem solving.
33.3% 16.7% 4.2 50.0% 6
Q28 I learned how to quantify fluid pressure and forces on submerged surfaces under
static conditions.
50.0% 4.5 50.0% 6
Q29 I learned how to quantify flow rate, pressure and forces in flowing fluids by using
conservation of mass, energy and momentum.
50.0% 4.5 50.0% 6
Q30 I Use laboratory exercises to develop better understanding of fluid properties, and
static and dynamic behavior of real fluids.
50.0% 16.7% 4.3 33.3% 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 16.7% 16.7% 3.2 66.7% 6
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 33.3% 16.7% 4.0 50.0% 6
Q40 Value was added to my education. 16.7% 33.3% 3.8 50.0% 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 3.5 50.0% 6
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 16.7% 16.7% 3.7 66.7% 6
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
16.7% 33.3% 3.8 50.0% 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: BLAB
Class Number: 17245
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 2213: FLUID MECHANICS AND HYDRAULICS
Response Rate: 8/9Primary Instructor: Ronan,Anne D
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
100.0% 5.0 8
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 12.5% 37.5% 3.4 50.0% 8
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 62.5% 12.5% 4.5 25.0% 8
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 8
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 25.0% 12.5% 25.0% 3.8 37.5% 8
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 25.0% 50.0% 12.5% 2.1 12.5% 8
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 12.5% 3.6 87.5% 8
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 12.5% 37.5% 12.5% 3.3 37.5% 8
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an understanding of the nomenclature and standard units associated
with fluid mechanics as it relates to civil engineering and become adept in their use
in problem solving.
25.0% 4.3 75.0% 8
Q28 I learned how to quantify fluid pressure and forces on submerged surfaces under
static conditions.
50.0% 12.5% 4.3 37.5% 8
Q29 I learned how to quantify flow rate, pressure and forces in flowing fluids by using
conservation of mass, energy and momentum.
37.5% 25.0% 4.1 37.5% 8
Q30 I Use laboratory exercises to develop better understanding of fluid properties, and
static and dynamic behavior of real fluids.
37.5% 25.0% 3.9 37.5% 8
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 25.0% 25.0% 12.5% 3.6 37.5% 8
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 37.5% 37.5% 4.0 25.0% 8
Q40 Value was added to my education. 25.0% 12.5% 12.5% 3.9 50.0% 8
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 12.5% 12.5% 25.0% 3.5 50.0% 8
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 37.5% 4.4 62.5% 8
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
12.5% 25.0% 3.9 62.5% 8
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 5 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17082
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 3243: WATER RESOURCE ENGINEERING
Response Rate: 35/35Primary Instructor: Ronan,Anne D
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 35
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 97.1% 2.9% 35
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 94.3% 4.9 5.7% 35
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 85.7% 2.9% 2.9% 4.8 8.6% 35
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 68.6% 2.9% 4.6 28.6% 35
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 48.6% 2.9% 20.0% 2.9% 4.1 25.7% 35
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 77.1% 4.8 22.9% 35
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 45.7% 8.6% 14.3% 4.1 31.4% 35
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I continued and extended fluid mechanics, with a focus on applications of hydraulic
and hydrologic engineering.
76.5% 2.9% 4.7 20.6% 34
Q28 I have developed the fundamental principles of surface and ground-water
hydrology.
73.5% 4.7 26.5% 34
Q29 I know how to analyze pipe flows, pipe networks, open channel flow with
elementary design applications.
79.4% 2.9% 4.8 17.6% 34
Q30 I have explored water resources engineering professional challenges and ethical
issues.
2.9% 61.8% 4.5 35.3% 34
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 57.1% 2.9% 5.7% 4.5 34.3% 35
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 77.1% 2.9% 4.8 20.0% 35
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 35
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 74.3% 4.7 25.7% 35
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
73.5% 4.7 26.5% 34
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 73.5% 4.7 26.5% 34
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 73.5% 2.9% 2.9% 4.6 20.6% 34
A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice
73.5% 4.7 26.5% 34
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 6 of 6
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16209
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 7703: ENTREPRENEURSHIP
Response Rate: 10/12Primary Instructor: Kuyan,Vyacheslav
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 10
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.5 10
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 80.0% 10.0% 4.6 10.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 70.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.4 10.0% 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 70.0% 10.0% 4.6 20.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 70.0% 10.0% 4.6 20.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 70.0% 4.7 30.0% 10
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 50.0% 10.0% 4.6 40.0% 10
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
60.0% 10.0% 4.7 30.0% 10
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
60.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.6 20.0% 10
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
60.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.6 20.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 10.0% 60.0% 10.0% 4.1 20.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 70.0% 4.7 30.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 80.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.5 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 80.0% 10.0% 4.6 10.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16201
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6243: Change Management Systems in Organizations
Response Rate: 8/9Primary Instructor: Seppalainen,Johanna
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 8
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 7
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 8
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 8
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 8
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
100.0% 5.0 7
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
71.4% 4.7 28.6% 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 8
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 8
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 8
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LVL1
Class Number: 16962
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6243: Change Management Systems in Organizations
Response Rate: 3/5Primary Instructor: Seppalainen,Johanna
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 3
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 3
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 33.3% 5.0 3
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
100.0% 5.0 3
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
66.7% 33.3% 4.3 3
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 100.0% 5.0 3
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 66.7% 33.3% 5.0 3
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
100.0% 5.0 3
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 33.3% 33.3% 4.0 33.3% 3
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 100.0% 5.0 3
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 66.7% 33.3% 4.0 3
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 3.3 3
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 33.3% 33.3% 4.0 33.3% 3
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 100.0% 5.0 3
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 66.7% 33.3% 4.0 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LVL1
Class Number: 16962
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6243: Change Management Systems in Organizations
Response Rate: 3/5Primary Instructor: Seppalainen,Johanna
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17560
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2131: General Physics Laboratory II
Response Rate: 25/31Primary Instructor: Sheverev,Valery A
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
72.0% 4.0% 4.7 24.0% 25
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 64.0% 8.0% 4.5 28.0% 25
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 76.0% 4.8 24.0% 25
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 36.0% 4.4 64.0% 25
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 12.0% 48.0% 4.0% 4.0% 8.0% 4.0 24.0% 25
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 56.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.5 36.0% 25
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 4.0% 20.0% 4.0% 4.0 72.0% 25
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 32.0% 4.0% 8.0% 4.3 56.0% 25
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 8.0% 24.0% 4.0% 4.0% 12.0% 3.8 48.0% 25
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 4.0% 40.0% 4.3 56.0% 25
Q40 Value was added to my education. 8.0% 16.0% 8.0% 3.8 68.0% 25
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 16.0% 20.0% 24.0% 3.5 40.0% 25
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A06 I have enhanced my ability to analyze and interpret data appropriately. 28.6% 4.8% 4.8% 4.3 61.9% 21
A17 I have enhanced my ability to conduct experiments to validate hypotheses and
theories.
33.3% 4.8% 9.5% 4.1 52.4% 21
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: F
Class Number: 17565
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 2131: General Physics Laboratory II
Response Rate: 30/32Primary Instructor: Sheverev,Valery A
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
66.7% 4.7 33.3% 30
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 53.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 4.4 36.7% 30
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 3.3% 73.3% 3.3% 4.6 20.0% 30
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 3.3% 43.3% 10.0% 10.0% 4.0 33.3% 30
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 3.3% 46.7% 3.3% 13.3% 4.2 33.3% 30
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 60.0% 3.3% 4.5 36.7% 30
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 3.3% 40.0% 3.3% 13.3% 4.1 40.0% 30
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 44.8% 13.8% 4.3 41.4% 29
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 6.7% 26.7% 13.3% 3.3% 3.8 50.0% 30
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 6.7% 33.3% 6.7% 10.0% 3.9 43.3% 30
Q40 Value was added to my education. 13.3% 16.7% 6.7% 20.0% 3.4 43.3% 30
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 20.0% 13.3% 13.3% 26.7% 3.0 26.7% 30
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A06 I have enhanced my ability to analyze and interpret data appropriately. 8.3% 37.5% 4.1 54.2% 24
A17 I have enhanced my ability to conduct experiments to validate hypotheses and
theories.
4.2% 33.3% 4.2% 8.3% 4.0 50.0% 24
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: C
Class Number: 17651
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 2034: Linear Algebra and Differential Equations
Response Rate: 3/25Primary Instructor: Van Wagenen,Lindsey
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 3
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 3
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 66.7% 33.3% 4.3 3
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 33.3% 4.3 3
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
33.3% 33.3% 4.0 33.3% 3
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 3.0 3
Q29 I need more HW problems. 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 2.7 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 66.7% 33.3% 4.0 3
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: D
Class Number: 17654
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 2034: Linear Algebra and Differential Equations
Response Rate: 5/22Primary Instructor: Van Wagenen,Lindsey
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 5
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 60.0% 40.0% 4.2 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 80.0% 20.0% 4.4 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 40.0% 20.0% 4.0 40.0% 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 20.0% 20.0% 60.0% 2.8 5
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
40.0% 60.0% 3.8 5
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 60.0% 40.0% 1.8 5
Q29 I need more HW problems. 40.0% 20.0% 20.0% 2.2 20.0% 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 40.0% 20.0% 4.2 40.0% 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16227
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
IE 6213: Facility Planning and Design
Response Rate: 16/26Primary Instructor: Posner,Michael
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 16
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 16
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 62.5% 12.5% 6.3% 4.3 18.8% 16
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 62.5% 6.3% 6.3% 4.4 25.0% 16
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 6.3% 81.3% 6.3% 4.6 6.3% 16
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 6.3% 75.0% 6.3% 4.5 12.5% 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 43.8% 6.3% 6.3% 4.3 43.8% 16
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 6.3% 62.5% 12.5% 4.3 18.8% 16
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 6.3% 31.3% 6.3% 18.8% 3.8 37.5% 16
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
37.5% 6.3% 4.3 56.3% 16
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
43.8% 6.3% 6.3% 4.3 43.8% 16
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
43.8% 12.5% 4.3 43.8% 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 6.3% 31.3% 6.3% 6.3% 3.9 50.0% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 31.3% 6.3% 18.8% 4.0 43.8% 16
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 6.3% 50.0% 6.3% 12.5% 4.1 25.0% 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 6.3% 31.3% 18.8% 12.5% 3.6 31.3% 16
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LVL1
Class Number: 16583
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
IE 6213: Facility Planning and Design
Response Rate: 7/9Primary Instructor: Posner,Michael
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 6
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 6
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 83.3% 16.7% 4.7 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 6
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 6
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 33.3% 16.7% 4.2 50.0% 6
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
50.0% 4.5 50.0% 6
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
50.0% 16.7% 4.3 33.3% 6
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 6
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 66.7% 16.7% 4.3 16.7% 6
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 66.7% 16.7% 4.5 16.7% 6
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 6
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 100.0% 5.0 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 16.7% 16.7% 3.8 66.7% 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LVL1
Class Number: 16583
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
IE 6213: Facility Planning and Design
Response Rate: 7/9Primary Instructor: Posner,Michael
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 6
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17721
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
STS 3904: Special Topics in STS
Response Rate: 19/28Primary Instructor: Landrus,Matthew H
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 19
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.6% 94.4% 18
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 57.9% 4.6 42.1% 19
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 31.6% 26.3% 4.1 42.1% 19
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 36.8% 5.3% 5.3% 31.6% 3.9 21.1% 19
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 5.3% 31.6% 15.8% 26.3% 3.6 21.1% 19
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 5.3% 31.6% 21.1% 3.7 42.1% 19
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 5.3% 21.1% 26.3% 26.3% 3.3 21.1% 19
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 22.2% 22.2% 33.3% 16.7% 2.7 5.6% 18
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 5.3% 31.6% 5.3% 5.3% 4.0 52.6% 19
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 5.3% 47.4% 5.3% 5.3% 10.5% 4.1 26.3% 19
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 5.3% 42.1% 5.3% 15.8% 5.3% 3.9 26.3% 19
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: MOT
Class Number: 16635
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 6303: OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
Response Rate: 15/16Primary Instructor: Mazzone,Thomas
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 93.3% 6.7% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 6.7% 86.7% 6.7% 15
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 86.7% 6.7% 4.7 6.7% 15
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 13.3% 46.7% 13.3% 6.7% 3.7 20.0% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 40.0% 26.7% 13.3% 13.3% 2.7 6.7% 15
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 7.1% 35.7% 7.1% 35.7% 3.8 14.3% 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 60.0% 13.3% 4.3 26.7% 15
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 46.7% 6.7% 13.3% 4.2 33.3% 15
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 13.3% 53.3% 4.1 33.3% 15
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
13.3% 40.0% 20.0% 3.8 26.7% 15
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
13.3% 46.7% 13.3% 3.9 26.7% 15
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
13.3% 53.3% 6.7% 4.1 26.7% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 6.7% 26.7% 13.3% 6.7% 3.7 46.7% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 6.7% 53.3% 6.7% 6.7% 4.1 26.7% 15
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 6.7% 53.3% 6.7% 13.3% 4.1 20.0% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 6.7% 60.0% 6.7% 20.0% 4.1 6.7% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: MOT
Class Number: 16605
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 8203: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Response Rate: 28/39Primary Instructor: Mazzone,Thomas
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 96.4% 3.6% 28
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 11.1% 81.5% 7.4% 27
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 71.4% 3.6% 4.7 25.0% 28
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 67.9% 3.6% 3.6% 4.6 25.0% 28
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 14.3% 25.0% 32.1% 14.3% 3.0 14.3% 28
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 35.7% 3.6% 10.7% 39.3% 3.7 10.7% 28
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 57.1% 10.7% 4.5 32.1% 28
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 57.1% 3.6% 3.6% 4.5 35.7% 28
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 53.6% 3.6% 7.1% 4.4 35.7% 28
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
53.6% 3.6% 10.7% 4.4 32.1% 28
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
42.9% 3.6% 7.1% 4.3 46.4% 28
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
57.1% 3.6% 3.6% 4.5 35.7% 28
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 60.7% 7.1% 3.6% 4.4 28.6% 28
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 64.3% 3.6% 7.1% 4.5 25.0% 28
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 64.3% 3.6% 7.1% 4.5 25.0% 28
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 57.1% 17.9% 4.4 25.0% 28
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16975
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
TR 6211: ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES
Response Rate: 22/22Primary Instructor: Prassas,Elena S.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 21
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 21
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 59.1% 4.6 40.9% 22
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 81.8% 4.5% 4.8 13.6% 22
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.5% 59.1% 9.1% 4.4 27.3% 22
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 63.6% 4.5% 4.6 31.8% 22
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 45.5% 9.1% 4.5% 4.2 40.9% 22
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 4.5% 4.5% 4.4 40.9% 22
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 40.9% 13.6% 4.3 45.5% 22
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 63.6% 4.5% 4.6 31.8% 22
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 68.2% 4.7 31.8% 22
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 4.5% 4.5 45.5% 22
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 23235
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
TR 8011: SPECIAL TOPICS IN TRANSP A
Response Rate: 34/21Primary Instructor: Prassas,Elena S.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 5.9% 94.1% 34
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.9% 88.2% 5.9% 34
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 58.8% 5.9% 4.5 35.3% 34
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 76.5% 5.9% 11.8% 4.5 5.9% 34
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 52.9% 11.8% 35.3% 4.2 34
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 58.8% 29.4% 4.3 11.8% 34
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 5.9% 58.8% 5.9% 11.8% 4.2 17.6% 34
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 5.9% 47.1% 29.4% 4.0 17.6% 34
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 64.7% 5.9% 17.6% 4.4 11.8% 34
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 58.8% 11.8% 5.9% 4.3 23.5% 34
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 70.6% 5.9% 5.9% 4.5 17.6% 34
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 5.9% 52.9% 11.8% 5.9% 4.1 23.5% 34
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: B2
Class Number: 17664
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 2224: Data Analysis
Response Rate: 4/34Primary Instructor: Constantine,Adam
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 3
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 3
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 33.3% 33.3% 4.0 33.3% 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 3
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 33.3% 3.3 66.7% 3
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
33.3% 66.7% 3.0 3
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 2.0 3
Q29 I need more HW problems. 66.7% 33.3% 1.7 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 3.7 66.7% 3
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 33.3% 33.3% 4.0 33.3% 3
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 33.3% 66.7% 3.7 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: E
Class Number: 17666
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 2224: Data Analysis
Response Rate: 2/33Primary Instructor: Constantine,Adam
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 2
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 2
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 2
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 4.0 100.0% 2
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 4.0 100.0% 2
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 2.0 2
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
50.0% 50.0% 2.5 2
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 50.0% 50.0% 2.0 2
Q29 I need more HW problems. 50.0% 50.0% 2.0 2
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.0 100.0% 2
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.0 100.0% 2
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 2
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 3.0 50.0% 2
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: BKLN
Class Number: 17339
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 4912: Senior Seminar in Physics
Response Rate: 5/5Primary Instructor: Wolf,Edward
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 20.0% 60.0% 20.0% 5
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 40.0% 40.0% 4.0 20.0% 5
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 60.0% 40.0% 4.2 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 40.0% 20.0% 40.0% 3.6 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 40.0% 20.0% 40.0% 3.6 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 80.0% 20.0% 4.6 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 20.0% 40.0% 40.0% 3.4 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16229
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 5663: Physics of Alternative Energy
Response Rate: 20/22Primary Instructor: Wolf,Edward
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 20
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 20
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 90.0% 5.0% 4.8 5.0% 20
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 75.0% 10.0% 4.7 15.0% 20
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 20
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 95.0% 5.0 5.0% 20
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 75.0% 10.0% 4.7 15.0% 20
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 68.4% 15.8% 4.4 15.8% 19
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 5.0% 4.5 45.0% 20
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 5.0% 4.4 45.0% 20
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 55.0% 5.0% 4.5 40.0% 20
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 55.0% 5.0% 5.0% 4.4 35.0% 20
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: BKLN
Class Number: 16604
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 9541: GRADUATE SEMINAR II
Response Rate: 3/3Primary Instructor: Wolf,Edward
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 3
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 3
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 66.7% 33.3% 4.3 3
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 66.7% 33.3% 4.3 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 33.3% 33.3% 4.0 33.3% 3
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 3
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 33.3% 4.3 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 3
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16230
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 5663: Physics of Alternative Energy
Response Rate: 20/22Primary Instructor: Wolf,Edward
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 20
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 20
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 90.0% 5.0% 4.8 5.0% 20
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 75.0% 10.0% 4.7 15.0% 20
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 90.0% 4.9 10.0% 20
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 95.0% 5.0 5.0% 20
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 75.0% 10.0% 4.7 15.0% 20
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 68.4% 15.8% 4.4 15.8% 19
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 5.0% 4.5 45.0% 20
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 5.0% 4.4 45.0% 20
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 55.0% 5.0% 4.5 40.0% 20
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 55.0% 5.0% 5.0% 4.4 35.0% 20
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16211
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 8653: MANAGING TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE & INNOVATION
Response Rate: 15/16Primary Instructor: Nov,Oded
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 6.7% 93.3% 15
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 20.0% 73.3% 6.7% 15
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 60.0% 6.7% 4.5 33.3% 15
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 6.7% 66.7% 6.7% 4.4 20.0% 15
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 33.3% 6.7% 20.0% 4.0 40.0% 15
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 53.3% 13.3% 4.4 33.3% 15
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 73.3% 4.7 26.7% 15
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 46.7% 13.3% 4.3 40.0% 15
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 66.7% 6.7% 4.5 26.7% 15
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
73.3% 6.7% 4.7 20.0% 15
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
60.0% 6.7% 4.5 33.3% 15
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
73.3% 4.7 26.7% 15
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 53.3% 6.7% 4.5 40.0% 15
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 15
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 60.0% 13.3% 4.5 26.7% 15
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 15
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16218
Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation
MG 9703: PROJECT IN STRATEGY & INNOVATION MGMT
Response Rate: 35/35Primary Instructor: Nov,Oded
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 97.1% 2.9% 35
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 34
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 2.9% 40.0% 2.9% 20.0% 4.1 34.3% 35
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 5.7% 42.9% 5.7% 14.3% 4.0 31.4% 35
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 5.7% 45.7% 2.9% 11.4% 4.1 34.3% 35
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 2.9% 37.1% 5.7% 25.7% 4.0 28.6% 35
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 8.6% 42.9% 5.7% 5.7% 4.0 37.1% 35
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 11.4% 42.9% 2.9% 20.0% 3.9 22.9% 35
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 5.7% 37.1% 2.9% 5.7% 14.3% 3.9 34.3% 35
Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role
in the profession.
2.9% 48.6% 2.9% 5.7% 4.3 40.0% 35
Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or
intended position and career.
40.0% 2.9% 11.4% 5.7% 4.1 40.0% 35
Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative
in solving contemporary managerial issues.
2.9% 48.6% 2.9% 5.7% 4.3 40.0% 35
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 2.9% 40.0% 2.9% 8.6% 5.7% 4.1 40.0% 35
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 8.6% 48.6% 11.4% 4.1 31.4% 35
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 11.4% 42.9% 2.9% 5.7% 14.3% 3.8 22.9% 35
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 8.6% 42.9% 2.9% 8.6% 5.7% 3.9 31.4% 35
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Class Number: 1013D-Barinov,Victor
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH 1013: MECHANICS
Response Rate: 45/58Primary Instructor: Barinov,Victor
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 2.3% 95.5% 2.3% 44
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 2.3% 95.3% 2.3% 43
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 8.9% 26.7% 4.4% 11.1% 20.0% 3.6 28.9% 45
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 11.4% 20.5% 6.8% 20.5% 22.7% 3.2 18.2% 44
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 42.2% 2.2% 2.2% 24.4% 4.1 28.9% 45
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 35.6% 2.2% 6.7% 15.6% 4.1 40.0% 45
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 6.7% 15.6% 2.2% 11.1% 22.2% 3.5 42.2% 45
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.4% 24.4% 4.4% 6.7% 28.9% 3.7 31.1% 45
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.4% 26.7% 2.2% 6.7% 17.8% 3.8 42.2% 45
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.4% 17.8% 4.4% 13.3% 26.7% 3.5 33.3% 45
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 22.2% 13.3% 2.2% 20.0% 24.4% 2.8 17.8% 45
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 6.7% 20.0% 2.2% 13.3% 28.9% 3.4 28.9% 45
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17104
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 2221: ORGANIC CHEMISTRY LABORATORY II
Response Rate: 9/12Primary Instructor: Barinov,Victor
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 9
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 11.1% 88.9% 4.6 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 77.8% 11.1% 4.7 11.1% 9
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 77.8% 11.1% 4.6 11.1% 9
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 88.9% 11.1% 4.7 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 88.9% 11.1% 4.8 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 77.8% 11.1% 11.1% 4.6 9
Q40 Value was added to my education. 66.7% 11.1% 11.1% 4.5 11.1% 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 66.7% 11.1% 11.1% 4.5 11.1% 9
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 9
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 77.8% 11.1% 4.7 11.1% 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A2
Class Number: 23809
Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering
CM 2221: ORGANIC CHEMISTRY LABORATORY II
Response Rate: 10/11Primary Instructor: Barinov,Victor
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
70.0% 4.7 30.0% 10
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 40.0% 20.0% 4.0 40.0% 10
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 70.0% 10.0% 4.6 20.0% 10
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 60.0% 10.0% 4.5 30.0% 10
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 10.0% 20.0% 4.1 20.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 40.0% 10.0% 4.3 50.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 10.0% 4.3 40.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 50.0% 10.0% 4.4 40.0% 10
Q40 Value was added to my education. 60.0% 10.0% 4.5 30.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 20.0% 4.3 30.0% 10
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 50.0% 10.0% 20.0% 4.1 20.0% 10
A34 I have enhanced my ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze
and interpret data
50.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.2 30.0% 10
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 40.0% 10.0% 30.0% 3.9 20.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: F
Class Number: 21588
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 9103: SPECIAL TOPICS IN DIGITAL MEDIA
Response Rate: 14/15Primary Instructor: Ricca,Chris
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 14
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 14
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 42.9% 14.3% 4.3 42.9% 14
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 7.1% 50.0% 7.1% 7.1% 4.1 28.6% 14
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 14.3% 35.7% 21.4% 3.7 28.6% 14
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 7.1% 42.9% 14.3% 4.1 35.7% 14
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 14.3% 28.6% 14.3% 21.4% 3.4 21.4% 14
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 7.1% 28.6% 28.6% 7.1% 3.4 28.6% 14
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 7.1% 14.3% 7.1% 21.4% 14.3% 3.3 35.7% 14
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 7.1% 57.1% 14.3% 4.1 21.4% 14
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 7.1% 50.0% 7.1% 21.4% 3.9 14.3% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 14.3% 42.9% 7.1% 14.3% 3.7 21.4% 14
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17483
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 4123: Experimental Cinema
Response Rate: 11/13Primary Instructor: Dyer,Maria G
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 9.1% 90.9% 11
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 9.1% 90.9% 11
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 9.1% 54.5% 18.2% 4.1 18.2% 11
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 9.1% 63.6% 9.1% 4.3 18.2% 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 9.1% 54.5% 18.2% 4.1 18.2% 11
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 18.2% 54.5% 18.2% 3.8 9.1% 11
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 9.1% 36.4% 9.1% 27.3% 3.8 18.2% 11
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 9.1% 45.5% 9.1% 18.2% 3.8 18.2% 11
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 9.1% 36.4% 9.1% 18.2% 3.7 27.3% 11
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 9.1% 54.5% 9.1% 4.1 27.3% 11
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 9.1% 45.5% 18.2% 3.8 27.3% 11
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17371
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 2113: Statics
Response Rate: 10/15Primary Instructor: Maloof,Roula A.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 10.0% 90.0% 10
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 10.0% 4.6 10.0% 10
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 70.0% 10.0% 4.6 20.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 70.0% 10.0% 4.5 20.0% 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 60.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.3 20.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 70.0% 4.7 30.0% 10
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I developed an understanding of the principles of mechanics and its application to
solve engineering problems.
80.0% 10.0% 4.6 10.0% 10
Q28 I developed the skills of analysis of equilibrium of rigid bodies subject to static and
dynamic loads.
60.0% 4.6 40.0% 10
Q29 I developed an understanding of applications of vector mathematics. 70.0% 4.7 30.0% 10
Q30 I can conceptualize physical objects in two and three dimensions. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 10.0% 4.3 40.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 70.0% 10.0% 4.5 20.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 40.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.1 40.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 40.0% 10.0% 4.2 50.0% 10
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 70.0% 4.7 30.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: LEC
Class Number: 17373
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 3133: Structural Analysis
Response Rate: 36/18Primary Instructor: Maloof,Roula A.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 34
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.6% 83.3% 11.1% 36
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 83.3% 5.6% 4.8 11.1% 36
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 55.6% 16.7% 11.1% 4.1 16.7% 36
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 38.9% 27.8% 11.1% 3.7 22.2% 36
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 16.7% 50.0% 5.6% 16.7% 11.1% 3.5 36
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 5.6% 50.0% 16.7% 5.6% 3.9 22.2% 36
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 5.9% 47.1% 11.8% 17.6% 3.9 17.6% 34
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I received a clear and thorough presentation of the theory and application of
structural analysis as it applies to trusses, beams and frames.
5.9% 47.1% 11.8% 11.8% 3.9 23.5% 34
Q28 Your background in mechanics of materials was adequate in preparation for this
course.
37.5% 12.5% 6.3% 4.1 43.8% 32
Q29 You have a good understanding of the role structural analysis plays in design of
structures.
5.9% 35.3% 5.9% 11.8% 3.9 41.2% 34
Q30 Use of computer methods was instructive. 35.3% 11.8% 4.1 52.9% 34
Q31 A balance of simplified methods was introduced in addition to the more
sophisticated analysis techniques.
5.9% 41.2% 5.9% 23.5% 3.9 23.5% 34
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 16.7% 38.9% 5.6% 22.2% 3.4 16.7% 36
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 11.1% 55.6% 5.6% 5.6% 4.1 22.2% 36
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 22.2% 38.9% 5.6% 5.6% 3.6 27.8% 36
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 11.1% 50.0% 16.7% 5.6% 3.8 16.7% 36
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 5.9% 41.2% 5.9% 5.9% 4.1 41.2% 34
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: ALEC
Class Number: 17448
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 3173: STRUCTURAL DESIGN
Response Rate: 32/19Primary Instructor: Maloof,Roula A.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 3.1% 96.9% 32
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 3.1% 96.9% 32
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 68.8% 3.1% 4.7 28.1% 32
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 3.2% 45.2% 9.7% 9.7% 4.1 32.3% 31
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 6.3% 18.8% 25.0% 15.6% 3.3 34.4% 32
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 6.3% 18.8% 28.1% 25.0% 3.2 21.9% 32
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 15.6% 18.8% 25.0% 12.5% 3.1 28.1% 32
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 12.5% 18.8% 21.9% 12.5% 3.3 34.4% 32
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 12.5% 28.1% 15.6% 3.1% 3.6 40.6% 32
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.1% 34.4% 9.4% 9.4% 4.0 43.8% 32
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 3.1% 28.1% 25.0% 25.0% 3.4 18.8% 32
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 9.4% 34.4% 15.6% 9.4% 3.7 31.3% 32
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 31.3% 9.4% 12.5% 4.0 46.9% 32
A41 I have enhanced my ability to develop a recognition of the need for, and an ability
to engage in life-long learning
15.6% 15.6% 18.8% 3.7 50.0% 32
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 12.5% 18.8% 18.8% 12.5% 3.3 37.5% 32
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: BLEC
Class Number: 17449
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 3173: STRUCTURAL DESIGN
Response Rate: 12/11Primary Instructor: Maloof,Roula A.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 8.3% 91.7% 12
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 8.3% 91.7% 12
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 41.7% 8.3% 4.3 50.0% 12
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 16.7% 16.7% 25.0% 16.7% 3.0 25.0% 12
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 25.0% 33.3% 3.2 41.7% 12
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 8.3% 33.3% 8.3% 3.0 50.0% 12
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 8.3% 25.0% 16.7% 3.1 50.0% 12
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 16.7% 25.0% 16.7% 16.7% 3.3 25.0% 12
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 8.3% 33.3% 3.4 58.3% 12
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 25.0% 16.7% 3.9 58.3% 12
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 16.7% 8.3% 16.7% 33.3% 2.9 25.0% 12
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 8.3% 25.0% 25.0% 3.8 41.7% 12
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 8.3% 16.7% 8.3% 3.7 66.7% 12
A41 I have enhanced my ability to develop a recognition of the need for, and an ability
to engage in life-long learning
16.7% 33.3% 3.3 50.0% 12
A42 I have increased my knowledge of contemporary issues 16.7% 25.0% 16.7% 2.8 41.7% 12
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 4
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16710
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 8363: BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING PROJECT CONTROLS
Response Rate: 9/14Primary Instructor: Aslani,Pooyan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 11.1% 66.7% 22.2% 9
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 11.1% 77.8% 11.1% 9
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 44.4% 22.2% 11.1% 4.4 22.2% 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 11.1% 33.3% 11.1% 11.1% 33.3% 3.4 9
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 66.7% 3.0 9
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 22.2% 11.1% 11.1% 22.2% 11.1% 2.8 22.2% 9
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 22.2% 22.2% 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 3.1 22.2% 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 33.3% 3.0 33.3% 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 33.3% 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 4.0 33.3% 9
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 33.3% 11.1% 44.4% 3.4 11.1% 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 22.2% 22.2% 11.1% 22.2% 3.0 22.2% 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 16855
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
DM 7033: Media Law
Response Rate: 18/18Primary Instructor: Dykema,Erik
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 16.7% 83.3% 18
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 11.1% 88.9% 18
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 72.2% 5.6% 4.6 22.2% 18
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 18
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 5.6% 50.0% 4.3 44.4% 18
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 5.6% 55.6% 5.6% 4.3 33.3% 18
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 5.6% 38.9% 5.6% 11.1% 4.0 38.9% 18
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 5.6% 38.9% 5.6% 22.2% 4.0 27.8% 18
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 5.6% 44.4% 11.1% 5.6% 4.0 33.3% 18
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 61.1% 5.6% 4.5 33.3% 18
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 5.6% 55.6% 5.6% 4.3 33.3% 18
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 5.6% 44.4% 5.6% 11.1% 4.1 33.3% 18
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: LCLB
Class Number: 17200
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 4543: CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROJECT
Response Rate: 23/25Primary Instructor: Abou Moussa,Walid Amin
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 23
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 8.7% 91.3% 23
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 87.0% 4.3% 4.8 8.7% 23
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 52.2% 13.0% 4.3 34.8% 23
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 60.9% 8.7% 4.5 30.4% 23
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 39.1% 8.7% 4.3% 4.2 47.8% 23
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 68.2% 9.1% 4.5 22.7% 22
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.3% 52.2% 8.7% 8.7% 4.1 26.1% 23
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have demonstrated proficiency in the basic construction management skills,
including planning, estimating, scheduling and building information modeling.
85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
Q28 I was responsible for deliverables as part of a team. 100.0% 5.0 7
Q29 I understand the application of construction management principles and practices. 100.0% 5.0 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 60.9% 17.4% 4.3 21.7% 23
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 73.9% 4.3% 4.7 21.7% 23
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 65.2% 8.7% 4.5 26.1% 23
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.3% 65.2% 4.3% 13.0% 4.3 13.0% 23
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
50.0% 4.5% 4.4 45.5% 22
A36 I have learned how to function on multi-disciplinary teams 59.1% 4.6 40.9% 22
A38 I have enhanced my ability to develop an understanding of professional and ethical
responsibility
63.6% 9.1% 4.5 27.3% 22
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 63.6% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5 27.3% 22
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LCLB
Class Number: 17588
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 4812: Civil Engineering Design I: Site Planning and Design
Response Rate: 23/25Primary Instructor: Abou Moussa,Walid Amin
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 23
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 8.7% 91.3% 23
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 87.0% 4.3% 4.8 8.7% 23
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 52.2% 13.0% 4.3 34.8% 23
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 60.9% 8.7% 4.5 30.4% 23
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 39.1% 8.7% 4.3% 4.2 47.8% 23
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 68.2% 9.1% 4.5 22.7% 22
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.3% 52.2% 8.7% 8.7% 4.1 26.1% 23
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have demonstrated proficiency in the basic construction management skills,
including planning, estimating, scheduling and building information modeling.
85.7% 4.9 14.3% 7
Q28 I was responsible for deliverables as part of a team. 100.0% 5.0 7
Q29 I understand the application of construction management principles and practices. 100.0% 5.0 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 60.9% 17.4% 4.3 21.7% 23
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 73.9% 4.3% 4.7 21.7% 23
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 65.2% 8.7% 4.5 26.1% 23
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.3% 65.2% 4.3% 13.0% 4.3 13.0% 23
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
50.0% 4.5% 4.4 45.5% 22
A36 I have learned how to function on multi-disciplinary teams 59.1% 4.6 40.9% 22
A38 I have enhanced my ability to develop an understanding of professional and ethical
responsibility
63.6% 9.1% 4.5 27.3% 22
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 63.6% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5 27.3% 22
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: LCLB
Class Number: 17590
Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering
CE 4822: Civil Engineering Design II: Structural Design
Response Rate: 38/40Primary Instructor: Abou Moussa,Walid Amin
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 97.4% 2.6% 38
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 10.5% 89.5% 38
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 5.3% 65.8% 2.6% 13.2% 4.3 13.2% 38
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 10.5% 13.2% 13.2% 23.7% 3.3 39.5% 38
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 13.2% 18.4% 13.2% 39.5% 3.1 15.8% 38
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 7.9% 13.2% 23.7% 39.5% 3.0 15.8% 38
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 15.8% 18.4% 39.5% 18.4% 2.7 7.9% 38
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 5.3% 10.5% 18.4% 42.1% 3.2 23.7% 38
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 5.3% 26.3% 10.5% 28.9% 3.6 28.9% 38
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 10.5% 23.7% 15.8% 21.1% 3.4 28.9% 38
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 13.2% 10.5% 15.8% 26.3% 3.1 34.2% 38
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 21.1% 15.8% 18.4% 18.4% 3.0 26.3% 38
P. ABET- As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet
desired needs
11.1% 19.4% 2.8% 22.2% 3.6 44.4% 36
A36 I have learned how to function on multi-disciplinary teams 8.3% 27.8% 19.4% 3.8 44.4% 36
A38 I have enhanced my ability to develop an understanding of professional and ethical
responsibility
8.3% 22.2% 5.6% 27.8% 3.6 36.1% 36
A39 I have learned how to communicate effectively 11.1% 22.2% 2.8% 22.2% 3.6 41.7% 36
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16294
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6003: Financial Accounting
Response Rate: 4/6Primary Instructor: Marshall,Ingrid M
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 4
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 4
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 4
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 4
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 4
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 4
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 4
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 75.0% 25.0% 4.3 4
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 4
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 4
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 4
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: I2
Class Number: 16620
Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering
FRE 6003: Financial Accounting
Response Rate: 26/27Primary Instructor: Marshall,Ingrid M
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 26
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 3.8% 96.2% 26
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 3.8% 80.8% 3.8% 4.7 11.5% 26
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 3.8% 69.2% 3.8% 7.7% 4.4 15.4% 26
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 3.8% 84.6% 3.8% 3.8% 4.6 3.8% 26
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 3.8% 80.8% 7.7% 4.6 7.7% 26
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 3.8% 80.8% 4.7 15.4% 26
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 3.8% 80.8% 4.7 15.4% 26
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 3.8% 57.7% 3.8% 7.7% 4.3 26.9% 26
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 3.8% 53.8% 3.8% 7.7% 4.3 30.8% 26
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 3.8% 53.8% 3.8% 7.7% 4.4 30.8% 26
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 3.8% 53.8% 3.8% 15.4% 4.3 23.1% 26
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17537
Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society
SEG 2194W: WRITING ABOUT NATURE & THE ENVIRONMENT
Response Rate: 11/18Primary Instructor: Cherry,Steven M
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 11
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 11
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 11
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 72.7% 9.1% 9.1% 4.5 9.1% 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 45.5% 18.2% 4.1 36.4% 11
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 72.7% 9.1% 4.6 18.2% 11
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 36.4% 9.1% 9.1% 27.3% 3.9 18.2% 11
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I have enhanced my ability to effectively communicate including being able to give
oral presentations that increase knowledge, foster understanding, or encourage
change.
72.7% 9.1% 18.2% 4.4 11
Q28 I have enhanced by ability to read effectively, including being able to extract and to
create meaning from the written texts.
63.6% 18.2% 4.5 18.2% 11
Q29 I developed perspectives of the humanities and social sciences to bear within
technical discourse.
63.6% 18.2% 4.5 18.2% 11
Q30 I have enhanced my ability to commuicate effectively (oral & writing). 90.9% 4.9 9.1% 11
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 72.7% 9.1% 9.1% 4.5 9.1% 11
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 81.8% 4.8 18.2% 11
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 11
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 11
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 16286
Dept. of Interdisciplinary Studies
BI 7523: Biological Foundation for Bioinformatics
Response Rate: 2/4Primary Instructor: Hughes,Benjamin
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 2
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 2
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 2
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 100.0% 5.0 2
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
100.0% 5.0 2
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 100.0% 5.0 2
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
100.0% 5.0 2
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 100.0% 5.0 2
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 100.0% 5.0 2
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 100.0% 3.0 2
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 100.0% 3.0 2
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 100.0% 3.0 2
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 2
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
13-February-2017
Section: E2
Class Number: 17667
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 2224: Data Analysis
Response Rate: 5/34Primary Instructor: Arakelian,Alex
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 5
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 80.0% 20.0% 4.6 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 40.0% 40.0% 3.2 20.0% 5
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
60.0% 3.4 40.0% 5
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 20.0% 20.0% 40.0% 2.6 20.0% 5
Q29 I need more HW problems. 60.0% 40.0% 1.4 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 20.0% 20.0% 40.0% 3.4 20.0% 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 20.0% 4.2 80.0% 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 40.0% 40.0% 4.0 20.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: B3
Class Number: 24397
Dept. of Mathematics
MA 2224: Data Analysis
Response Rate: 3/32Primary Instructor: Arakelian,Alex
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 3
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 3
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 33.3% 66.7% 3.7 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 2.7 33.3% 3
E. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:Avg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful
resources.
66.7% 3.3 33.3% 3
Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 66.7% 3.3 33.3% 3
Q29 I need more HW problems. 100.0% 1.0 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 33.3% 4.3 66.7% 3
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 33.3% 3.7 66.7% 3
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 33.3% 33.3% 4.0 33.3% 3
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 2
13-February-2017
Section: ALEC
Class Number: 17165
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 2013: Fundamentals of Electric Circuits I
Response Rate: 18/35Primary Instructor: Zabar,Zivan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 11.1% 77.8% 11.1% 18
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 16.7% 77.8% 5.6% 18
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 18
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 33.3% 5.6% 5.6% 33.3% 3.9 22.2% 18
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 55.6% 16.7% 4.4 27.8% 18
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 22.2% 16.7% 22.2% 3.7 38.9% 18
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 22.2% 22.2% 16.7% 3.6 38.9% 18
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 22.2% 11.1% 22.2% 5.6% 2.9 38.9% 18
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 16.7% 16.7% 22.2% 16.7% 3.1 27.8% 18
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 27.8% 16.7% 11.1% 3.8 44.4% 18
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 27.8% 22.2% 22.2% 3.6 27.8% 18
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 11.1% 33.3% 11.1% 33.3% 3.4 11.1% 18
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: INET
Class Number: 23878
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 5613: Introduction to Electric Power Systems
Response Rate: 8/10Primary Instructor: Zabar,Zivan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 87.5% 12.5% 8
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 75.0% 25.0% 8
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 62.5% 4.6 37.5% 8
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 12.5% 12.5% 50.0% 3.4 25.0% 8
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 12.5% 25.0% 12.5% 12.5% 3.5 37.5% 8
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 25.0% 25.0% 4.0 50.0% 8
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 25.0% 12.5% 4.0 62.5% 8
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 37.5% 12.5% 25.0% 3.9 25.0% 8
E1. Online Course ModuleAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 37.5% 12.5% 4.1 50.0% 8
L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 37.5% 3.1 25.0% 8
L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office
hours.
12.5% 50.0% 12.5% 12.5% 4.0 12.5% 8
L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 12.5% 25.0% 12.5% 37.5% 3.3 12.5% 8
L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to
follow and were effective learning tools.
50.0% 25.0% 4.0 25.0% 8
L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 37.5% 12.5% 25.0% 3.9 25.0% 8
L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 62.5% 12.5% 4.4 25.0% 8
L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 25.0% 62.5% 3.6 12.5% 8
L28 NYU Tandon Online (formerly NYU-ePoly) support staff was responsive and helpful. 37.5% 12.5% 25.0% 4.1 25.0% 8
L29 The Live Virtual Learning support staff was responsive and helpful. 25.0% 62.5% 3.6 12.5% 8
L30 I am likely to take another online course. 62.5% 12.5% 4.5 25.0% 8
L31 I am likely to take another Live Virtual Learning course. 25.0% 12.5% 50.0% 3.7 12.5% 8
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 37.5% 12.5% 4.4 50.0% 8
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 75.0% 12.5% 4.5 12.5% 8
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 12.5% 37.5% 4.0 50.0% 8
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 12.5% 50.0% 4.1 37.5% 8
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: I
Class Number: 16772
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EL 6683: Electric Drives
Response Rate: 11/14Primary Instructor: Zabar,Zivan
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 9.1% 90.9% 11
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 11
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 9.1% 63.6% 4.4 27.3% 11
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 63.6% 9.1% 18.2% 4.3 9.1% 11
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 18.2% 72.7% 4.2 9.1% 11
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 18.2% 72.7% 4.2 9.1% 11
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 81.8% 9.1% 4.6 9.1% 11
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 45.5% 9.1% 36.4% 3.9 9.1% 11
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 63.6% 9.1% 9.1% 4.4 18.2% 11
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 9.1% 54.5% 9.1% 4.2 27.3% 11
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 9.1% 72.7% 4.5 18.2% 11
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 9.1% 45.5% 9.1% 9.1% 3.9 27.3% 11
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 3
13-February-2017
Section: A
Class Number: 17164
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 1002: INTRODUCTION TO ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
Response Rate: 38/50Primary Instructor: Campisi,Matthew S.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 14.3% 77.1% 8.6% 35
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 2.6% 94.7% 2.6% 38
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 92.1% 4.9 7.9% 38
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 73.7% 2.6% 10.5% 4.6 13.2% 38
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 5.3% 47.4% 2.6% 26.3% 4.0 18.4% 38
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 39.5% 2.6% 26.3% 4.1 31.6% 38
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 2.6% 71.1% 2.6% 4.6 23.7% 38
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 5.3% 15.8% 7.9% 57.9% 3.4 13.2% 38
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 2.6% 26.3% 2.6% 18.4% 3.9 50.0% 38
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 2.6% 57.9% 2.6% 7.9% 4.4 28.9% 38
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 84.2% 5.3% 4.8 10.5% 38
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 5.3% 65.8% 5.3% 4.4 23.7% 38
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 10
13-February-2017
Section: ALEC
Class Number: 17171
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 2024: Fundamentals of Electric Circuits II
Response Rate: 63/91Primary Instructor: Campisi,Matthew S.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 1.6% 95.2% 3.2% 63
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 1.6% 96.8% 1.6% 63
B. The Lecture InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 96.8% 5.0 3.2% 63
Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 76.2% 3.2% 9.5% 4.7 11.1% 63
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 49.2% 1.6% 6.3% 4.4 42.9% 63
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 55.6% 3.2% 1.6% 4.5 39.7% 63
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 76.2% 1.6% 3.2% 4.7 19.0% 63
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.8% 9.5% 9.5% 4.2 30.2% 63
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 6.5% 43.5% 1.6% 6.5% 11.3% 4.0 30.6% 62
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 76.2% 1.6% 1.6% 4.8 20.6% 63
Q41 Overall, I would recommend this Lecture Instructor. 87.3% 4.9 12.7% 63
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 1.6% 82.5% 1.6% 4.8 14.3% 63
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 2 of 10
13-February-2017
Section: A1LB
Class Number: 17376
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 2024: Fundamentals of Electric Circuits II
Response Rate: 14/13Primary Instructor: Campisi,Matthew S.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
57.1% 14.3% 4.3 28.6% 14
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 69.2% 4.7 30.8% 13
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 46.2% 15.4% 4.3 38.5% 13
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 61.5% 4.6 38.5% 13
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 53.8% 4.5 46.2% 13
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 38.5% 7.7% 4.2 53.8% 13
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 15.4% 38.5% 7.7% 15.4% 3.6 23.1% 13
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 7.7% 38.5% 30.8% 3.5 23.1% 13
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 30.8% 23.1% 4.1 46.2% 13
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 46.2% 23.1% 4.2 30.8% 13
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 14.3% 4.2 35.7% 14
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 46.2% 7.7% 4.3 46.2% 13
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 3 of 10
13-February-2017
Section: A2LB
Class Number: 17377
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 2024: Fundamentals of Electric Circuits II
Response Rate: 4/12Primary Instructor: Campisi,Matthew S.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 25.0% 75.0% 4.0 4
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 4
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 25.0% 25.0% 4.0 50.0% 4
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 50.0% 25.0% 4.3 25.0% 4
Q40 Value was added to my education. 75.0% 25.0% 4.5 4
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 75.0% 25.0% 4.5 4
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 4 of 10
13-February-2017
Section: B2LB
Class Number: 17379
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 2024: Fundamentals of Electric Circuits II
Response Rate: 1/13Primary Instructor: Campisi,Matthew S.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
100.0% 5.0 1
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 100.0% 5.0 1
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 1
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 1
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 1
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 1
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 1
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 5.0 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 5 of 10
13-February-2017
Section: C1LB
Class Number: 17380
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
EE 2024: Fundamentals of Electric Circuits II
Response Rate: 9/10Primary Instructor: Campisi,Matthew S.
Spring 2016 Course Evaluation - Results
A1. Regarding The LaboratoryAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the
beginning of the laboratory program
77.8% 11.1% 4.7 11.1% 9
L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 44.4% 4.4 55.6% 9
B1. The Laboratory InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L05 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 9
L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 88.9% 4.9 11.1% 9
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 77.8% 11.1% 4.7 11.1% 9
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 55.6% 11.1% 11.1% 4.2 22.2% 9
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 44.4% 11.1% 4.2 44.4% 9
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
L41 Overall, I would recommend this Laboratory Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 9
Q40 Value was added to my education. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 6 of 10
13-February-2017
