spring workshop - amazon s3 · spring workshop january 10, 2014 . agenda •welcome and...
TRANSCRIPT
Agenda
• Welcome and Introductions
• AQIP
• Baldrige
• Charting the Future
• 1-2-3 Budget
• Announcements
Accreditation by the Higher Learning Commission
provides assurance to the public, in particular to prospective students, that an organization has been found to meet the agency's clearly stated requirements and criteria and that there are reasonable grounds for believing that it will continue to meet them.
History
Required by MnSCU System
Required to qualify for, receive and administer Federal Financial Aid
Required for transfer of courses
Provides credibility to HTC academic awards
WHY Regional Accreditation
Changes in the Criteria
Changes in the processes - Pathways (AQIP, Standard, Open)
Changes in requirements - Federal Compliance
Changes coming to AQIP – are NOT in effect for 2014 Portfolio
Higher Learning Commission
7-Year Cycle
Annual Update
Action Projects - 3 Annually
Strategy Forum
System Portfolio
System Appraisal
Quality Check-Up Visit
Reaffirmation of Accreditation
The AQIP Pathway - Focus on Improvement
First accredited in 1999
Accepted as member of AQIP in 2003
Portfolios submitted
2006
2010
Strategy Forum - Oct 2011
2014 Portfolio due November
HTC Accreditation History
2014 Portfolio Steering Committee
Chairs of the Category Groups, Support Staff, VPAA/SA, Director IR
Co-Chairs Jeannine Uehling & Carmen Price
Kerri Patterson
Gail Waller
Todd Wadsworth
Vicky Ashby
Category 1 - Helping Students Learn
Marguerite Dummer - Chair
Dara Hagen
Annette Roth
Jeanne Morphew
Cheri Rollings
Deb Gillquist
Category 2 - Accomplishing
Other Distinctive Objectives
Phyllis Hayes - Chair
Matt Gustafson
Rachel Salmela
Angel Hoglund
Susan Markes
Nayda Sadr-Panah
Category 3 - Understanding
Students’ and other Stakeholders’ Needs
Chair position vacant at this writing
Seeking Chair for this Category
New Chair will seek members for sub-committee
Category 4 - Valuing People
Mike McGee - Chair
Joy Bodin
Jessica Lauritsen
Jean Kreutter
Nathan Stratton
Randy Roehrick
Ben Ystenes
Category 6 - Supporting Institutional Operations
Sue Selland - Chair
Caren Abdelaal
Jeff Thorstad
Danielle Tuttle
Kristine Ramos-Walker
Sara Laviolette
Sue Schmitz
Category 7 - Measuring Effectiveness
Pauline Arnst - Chair
Jenessa Gerling
Matt Leaf
Seeking additional members
Category 8 - Planning Continuous Improvement
Monica Erling - Chair
Katherine Stanley
Raul Ramos
Monica Janzen
Ernie Parker
Category 9 - Building Collaborative Relationships
Feedback Report
Comments on each AQIP Category by Appraisal Team
Results
89 Strengths
79 Opportunities for Improvement
Provides direction for continuous improvement
2010 Systems Appraisal
Strengths
“HTC uses a thorough process for establishing new programs...”
“HTC has multiple processes for communicating to current and prospective students…[regarding all aspects of program requirements].”
2010 System Appraisal Highlights
“HTC collects a variety of data to support and
measure results for its Foundation, Customized Training Services, and Hennepin West Consortium.”
“HTC has demonstrated improvements in two of the three distinctive component areas (Foundation and CTS).”
Strengths Cont.
“HTC has placed a high priority on building and
maintaining relationships with its students.”
“HTC has made a serious attempt to respond to the needs of key stakeholder groups…”
Strengths Cont.
“Although HTC has demonstrated that it engages in
partnerships and opportunities that have the potential for improving the future; it is unclear how they enhance a strong focus on students and learning. Engaging in opportunities that ensure student success in the future will help the College to meet the needs of these stakeholders.”
Opportunities
“HTC utilizes an internally developed employee survey
as the only tool to measure performance of the Leading and Communicating function. Collecting and analyzing this data on a regular basis would allow the College to gain insight into whether it is exhibiting best practices with regard to communication. Furthermore, the College may wish to consider use of a more comprehensive, standardized tool in the future.”
Opportunities Cont.
“HTC does not respond directly to process issues.”
“HTC lists several performance results, but does not include results for any of its stated measures or for more than a period of one year. HTC might benefit from gathering and analyzing performance results over time.”
“HTC could benefit from clarifying and more thoroughly documenting how it designs and operates its non-instructional processes.”
More Opportunities
Focus
Address Opportunities identified in 2010 Portfolio
Critical to demonstrate improvement
Respond to all questions in the 9 categories
Processes
Improvements
Results
Address Higher Learning Commission’s Five Criteria
Broad overview of HTC
Limited to 125 pages
2014 Portfolio
College-wide participation essential Not just 1 person, 1 dept., or 1 campus
Methods
Baldrige
Brown bags
Committee meetings
Focus groups
Other as identified by subcommittee
Data Gathering
Surveys PACE-completed
CCSSE - Spring term 2014
SENSE - Fall term 2014 (gen. ed. courses)
Quality Service
Student survey completed
Employee survey Feb. 2014
Assessment information - departmental/institutional
Graduate follow-up
Employer surveys
Data Gathering
Spring 2014 - Finalize subcommittee data gathering
(by May 21st)
Summer 2014 - Write portfolio
Watch for emails with drafts for YOUR review
Fall 2014 – Present final portfolio to HTC community
November 2014 - Submit portfolio to HLC
Timeline
YOUR PARTICIPATION
MATTERS
Respond to Surveys
Attend committee meetings
Attend focus groups
Provide feedback on portfolio drafts
Continuous Improvement
• “Plan-Do-Act-Check” Cycle
• AQIP Accreditation Process
• Quality Service: Friendly, Professional and
Helpful
• Accountability to Achieve Key Results
• Innovative Programs and Services
HTC’s Core Competencies
Core Competencies
• High-Tech Career Preparation
• Real-Life Skill Development Linked to Employment
• State-of-the-Art Equipment
• Largest Array of Cutting-Edge Technical Programs in MN
• Non-Traditional Access and Pathways
Next Steps
• Continue development of all 7 categories
• Share completed categories with teams for
feedback and refinement
• Submit application for review
Recommendations
• Dramatically increase the success of all learners
• Develop a collaborative and coordinated academic planning process
• Certify student competencies and capabilities
• Expand the innovative use of technology
• Work together under new models
• Redesign our financial and administrative models
Metro Enrollment
-14.0%
-12.0%
-10.0%
-8.0%
-6.0%
-4.0%
-2.0%
0.0%
-0.5%
-4.6% -4.9% -4.9% -5.3% -5.6%
-6.8%
-9.3%
-10.3%
-12.6%
FYE Change from FY13 to FY14
St. P
aul
Inve
r H
ills
MC
TC
An
oka
- R
amse
y
Ce
ntu
ry
NH
CC
No
rman
dal
e
An
oka
Te
ch
HTC
As of January 9, 2014
6 Year FYE Comparison
Final Final Final Final Final YTD Goal
FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2014
Summer 321 381 462 478 411 327 327
Fall 1,778 2,019 2,140 2,089 2,049 1,969 1,969
Spring 1,777 2,093 2,176 2,112 2,056 1,802 1,904
Total 3,876 4,493 4,778 4,679 4,515 4,099 4,200
As of January 9, 2014
6 Year FYE Comparison
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014
Summer Fall Spring
Final 4,778
Final 4,679
Final 4,515 YTD 4,099
Final 4,493
Final 3,876
As of January 9, 2014
FY14 Spring Enrollment Push
• Ready, Set, Go week
– Kick-off Saturday served 111 new students
– Monday – Wednesday served 259 new students
– Increased FYE from Dec. 31st by 96.30
– Additional revenue $476,685
• In kind contributions and industry donations as of December 31st $447K
Impact to Revenue of +100 FYE
Tuition income on 100 FYE $470K
Tech fee income on 100 FYE $ 27K
Total revenues $497K
FY14 Current Budget Projection
FYE 4200 Actual % of Accrued/ Remaining % of
Projection Collected/Paid Budget Encumbered Budget Budget
REVENUE:
State Appropriation 16,004$ 16,027$ 100% -$ -$ 0%
Tuition 20,511$ 11,484$ 56% 8,585$ 442$ 2%
Tech Fee & Other 2,188$ 1,111$ 51% 715$ 362$ 17%
TOTAL REVENUE: 38,703$ 28,622$ 74% 9,300$ 804$ 2%
EXPENSES:
Personnel 29,279$ 12,448$ 43% 13,426$ 3,405$ 12%
Nonpersonnel 9,397$ 3,518$ 37% 1,803$ 4,076$ 43%
TOTAL EXPENSES: 38,676$ 15,966$ 41% 15,229$ 7,481$ 19%
Budget Excess (Shortage) 27$ 12,656$ (5,929)$ 6,727$
As of December 31, 2013
Tuition and Fees
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$5,122 $5,686 $5,693
$6,124
$13,445 $14,640
$19,819 $20,700
$23,088
$32,750 FY 2013
(Source Higher Chronicle)
Other FY14 Issues:
• $17M one-time funds, eliminate rider language
• MnSCU five performance measures
– Completion rate
– Persistence and retention rate
– Employment rate
– Reduce students instructional costs
– Reallocate CSC savings
Other FY14 Issues (cont’d):
• Continued efforts to address accrual
financial losses
• Losses on audited financial statements 9
out of the past 11 years
2014 Technology Related Items
• Atomic Learning (24x7 online technology-related video training for all employees and students)
• MS Student Advantage (Office365Pro Plus software FREE to students to download up to 5 PC/MAC copies)
• NorthStar Digital Literacy Assessment (pilot for students and employees in spring)
Feb 25, 2014 Student Success Day Rollout
WATCH E-MAIL FOR MORE INFORMATION!
2014 Technology Related Items
Atomic Learning (24x7 online technology-related video training for all employees and students)
MS Student Advantage (Office365Pro Plus software FREE to students to download up to 5 PC/MAC copies)
NorthStar Digital Literacy Assessment (pilot for students and employees in spring)
WATCH E-MAIL FOR MORE INFORMATION!
2013 Wii Bowling Champions
The “Bowl Movements” Team
Kim Urahn
Yasmin Sparrow
Pam Drinkwine
Sandy Lindgren (Emeritus)
Upcoming Spring Events
• Adopt-A-Room (see your e-mail for
more info)
• 2014 Wii Bowling
• BINGO
• Take Your Child to Work Day
• End of Year Potluck
Employee Workshop – March 7
• Breaking Ice
– Pillsbury House Theatre
– Tailored to Individual Organizations
– Professional Actors
– Tackle Difficult Issues – Communication!
“CommUNITY Day: Creating an Inclusive Workplace”
Employee Workshop – March 7
• Dr. Heather Hackman
• “Exploring the Three Major Areas of Social
Justice, Equity and Deep Diversity”
– Addressing “isms”
– Equity through access to resources
– Understanding diversity without marginalizing
organizational members
“CommUNITY Day: Creating an Inclusive Workplace”
Keynote Speakers:
O’Neal & Sunshine Hampton
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59FDd1fKFok
Student Success Day Committee
Vicki Ashby Jessica Lauritsen
Mary Babcock Jean Maierhofer
Cheryl Benkofske Susan Markes
Lance Davis Kerrie Patterson
Dara Hagen Carmen Price
Phyllis Hayes Sheila Sylvander
Angel Hoglund Jason Jones
Bao Yang