spssmixed

Upload: lgovindarajan

Post on 09-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    1/82

    1

    Mixed Analysis ofVariance Models with

    SPSS

    Robert A.Yaffee, Ph.D.

    Statistics, Social Science, and MappingGroup

    Information Technology Services/Academic

    Computing ServicesOffice location: 75 Third Avenue, Level C-3

    Phone: 212-998-3402

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    2/82

    2

    Outline

    1. Classification of Effects

    2. Random Effects

    1. Two-Way Random Layout

    2. Solutions and estimates

    3. General linear model

    1. Fixed Effects Models1. The one-way layout

    4. Mixed Model theory1. Proper error terms

    5. Two-way layout6. Full-factorial model

    1. Contrasts with interaction terms

    2. Graphing Interactions

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    3/82

    3

    Outline-Contd

    Repeated Measures ANOVA

    Advantages of Mixed Modelsover GLM.

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    4/82

    4

    Definition of Mixed

    Models by their

    component effects

    1. Mixed Models contain bothfixed and random effects

    2. Fixed Effects: factors forwhich the only levels underconsideration are contained

    in the coding of those effects3. Random Effects: Factors for

    which the levels contained inthe coding of those factors

    are a random sample of thetotal number of levels in thepopulation for that factor.

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    5/82

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    6/82

    6

    Classification of effects

    1. There are main effects:

    Linear Explanatory Factors

    2. There are interaction effects:

    Joint effects over and above

    the component main effects.

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    7/82

    7

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    8/82

    8

    Classification of Effects-

    contd

    Hierarchical designs have nested

    effects. Nested effects are

    those with subjects within

    groups.

    An example would be patients

    nested within doctors anddoctors nested within hospitals

    This could be expressed by

    patients(doctors)

    doctors(hospitals)

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    9/82

    9

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    10/82

    10

    Between and Within-

    Subject effects

    Such effects may sometimes be fixed orrandom. Theirclassification depends on the experimental designBetween-subjects effects are those who are in one group or

    another but not in both. Experimental group is a fixed effectbecause the manager is considering only those groups in hisexperiment. One group is the experimental group and theother is the control group. Therefore, this grouping

    factor is a between- subject effect.

    Within-subject effects are experienced by subjectsrepeatedly over time. Trial is a random effect whenthere are several trials in the repeated measuresdesign; all subjects experience all of the trials. Trial istherefore a within-subject effect.Operator may be a fixed or random effect, dependingupon whether one is generalizing beyond the sample

    If operator is a random effect, then themachine*operator interaction is a random effect.There are contrasts: These contrast the values of onelevel with those of other levels of the same effect.

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    11/82

    11

    Between Subject

    effects

    Gender: One is either male or

    female, but not both.

    Group: One is either in the

    control, experimental, or the

    comparison group but not more

    than one.

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    12/82

    12

    Within-Subjects Effects

    These are repeated effects.

    Observation 1, 2, and 3 mightbe the pre, post, and follow-up

    observations on each person.

    Each person experiences all of

    these levels or categories.

    These are found in repeated

    measures analysis of variance.

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    13/82

    13

    Repeated Observations

    are Within-Subjects

    effects

    Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3

    Group

    Group is a between subjects effect, whereas Trial is a

    within subjects effect.

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    14/82

    14

    The General

    Linear Model1. The main effects general

    linear model can be

    parameterized as

    ( )

    ( )

    ( )

    exp ~ ( , )

    ij i j ij

    ij

    i i

    j j

    ij

    Y b

    where

    Y observation for ith

    grand mean an unknown fixed parm

    effect of ith value of a

    b effect of jth value of b b

    erimental error N

    Q E I

    E

    Q

    E E QQ

    I W

    !

    !

    !

    ! !

    ! 20

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    15/82

    15

    A factorial model

    If an interaction term were included,

    the formula would be

    ij i i ij ijy e Q E F EF!

    The interaction or crossed effect is the joint effect, over andabove the individual main effects. Therefore, the main effects

    must be in the model for the interaction to be properly specified.

    ( ) ( )

    i j ij

    ij

    y

    y

    EF Q E Q F Q

    E F Q

    !

    !

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    16/82

    16

    Higher-Order

    InteractionsIf 3-way interactions are in the

    model, then the main effects

    and all lower order interactions

    must be in the model for the 3-

    way interaction to be properly

    specified. For example, a3-way interaction model would

    be:

    ijk i j k ij ik jk

    ijk ijk

    y a b c ab ac bc

    abc e

    Q!

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    17/82

    17

    The General Linear

    Model In matrix terminology, the

    general linear model may be

    expressed as

    Y X

    where

    Y theobserved data vector

    X the design matrix

    thevector of unknown fixed effect parameters

    thevector of errors

    F I

    F

    I

    !

    !

    !

    !

    !

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    18/82

    18

    Assumptions

    Of the general linear model

    ( )

    var( )

    var( )

    ( )

    E

    I

    Y I

    E Y

    I

    I

    F

    !

    !

    !!

    2

    2

    0

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    19/82

    19

    General Linear Model

    Assumptions-contd1. Residual Normality.

    2. Homogeneity of error variance3. Functional form of Model:

    Linearity of Model

    4. No Multicollinearity5. Independence of observations

    6. No autocorrelation of errors

    7. No influential outliers

    We have to test for these to be sure that the model is

    valid.

    We will discuss the robustness of the model in face

    of violations of these assumptions.

    We will discuss recourses when these assumptions are

    violated.

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    20/82

    20

    Explanation of these

    assumptions1. Functional form of Model: Linearity of

    Model: These models only analyze thelinear relationship.

    2. Independence of observations3. Representativeness of sample

    4. Residual Normality: So the alpharegions of the significance tests areproperly defined.

    5. Homogeneity of error variance: So theconfidence limits may be easily found.

    6. No Multicollinearity: Prevents efficientestimation of the parameters.

    7. No autocorrelation of errors:

    Autocorrelation inflates the R2 ,F and ttests.

    8. No influential outliers: They bias theparameter estimation.

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    21/82

    21

    Diagnostic tests for these

    assumptions1. Functional form of Model:

    Linearity of Model: Pair plot

    2. Independence of observations:Runs test

    3. Representativeness of sample:Inquire about sample design

    4. Residual Normality: SK or SW

    test5. Homogeneity of error variance

    Graph of Zresid * Zpred

    6. No Multicollinearity: Corr of X

    7. No autocorrelation of errors: ACF8. No influential outliers: Leverage

    and Cooks D.

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    22/82

    22

    Testing for outliers

    Frequencies analysis of stdres

    cksd.

    Look for standardized residuals

    greater than 3.5 or less than

    3.5

    And look for Cooks D.

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    23/82

    23

    Studentized Residuals

    ( )

    ( )

    ( )i

    s ii

    i

    s

    i

    i

    i

    ees h

    here

    e studentized residual

    s standard deviation hereith obs is deleted

    h leverage statistic

    !

    !

    !

    !

    21

    Belsley et al (1980) recommend the use of studentized

    Residuals to determine whether there is an outlier.

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    24/82

    24

    Influence of Outliers

    1. Leverage is measured by the

    diagonal components of the

    hat matrix.

    2. The hat matrix comes from

    the formula for the regression

    of Y. '( ' ) '

    '( ' ) ' ,

    ,

    Y Y

    here the hat atrix H

    Therefore

    Y HY

    F

    ! !

    !

    !

    1

    1

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    25/82

    25

    Leverage and the Hat

    matrix1. The hat matrix transforms Y into the

    predicted scores.

    2. The diagonals of the hat matrix indicate

    which values will be outliers or not.3. The diagonals are therefore measures

    of leverage.

    4. Leverage is bounded by two limits: 1/nand 1. The closer the leverage is to

    unity, the more leverage the value has.5. The trace of the hat matrix = the

    number of variables in the model.

    6. When the leverage > 2p/n then there ishigh leverage according to Belsley et

    al. (198

    0) cited in Long, J.F. ModernMethods of Data Analysis (p.262). Forsmaller samples, Vellman and Welsch(1981) suggested that 3p/n is thecriterion.

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    26/82

    26

    Cooks D

    1. Another measure of

    influence.

    2. This is a popular one. The

    formula for it is:

    ' ( )

    i i

    ii i

    h e

    Cook s D p h s h

    !

    2

    2

    1

    1 1

    Cook and Weisberg(1982) suggested that values of

    D that exceeded 50% of the F distribution (df = p, n-p)are large.

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    27/82

    27

    Cooks D in SPSS

    Finding the influential outliers

    Select those observations for which

    cksd > (4*p)/n

    Belsley suggests 4/(n-p-1) as a

    cutoff

    If cksd > (4*p)/(n-p-1);

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    28/82

    28

    What to do with outliers

    1. Check coding to spot typos

    2. Correct typos

    3. If observational outlier is correct,examine the dffits option to seethe influence on the fitting

    statistics.4. This will show the standardized

    influence of the observation onthe fit. If the influence of the

    outlier is bad, then considerremoval or replacement of it withimputation.

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    29/82

    29

    Decomposition of the

    Sums of Squares1. Mean deviations are computed

    when means are subtracted from

    individual scores.1. This is done for the total, the

    group mean, and the error terms.

    2. Mean deviations are squared andthese are called sums of squares

    3. Variances are computed bydividing the Sums of Squares by

    their degrees of freedom.4. The total Variance = Model

    Variance + error variance

    F l f D iti

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    30/82

    30

    Formula for Decomposition

    of Sums of Squares

    SS total = SS error + SSmodel

    . .

    . .

    . .

    ( ) ( ..)

    ( ) ( ) ( ..)

    ( ) ( ) ( ..)

    i j ij j j

    i j ij j j

    i j ij j j

    y y y y y y

    total effect error within model effect

    we square the terms

    y y y y y y

    and sum them over the data set

    y y y y y y

    SS total SSerror Group SS

    where SS Sums of

    !

    !

    !

    ! !

    !

    2 2 2

    2 2 2

    Squares

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    31/82

    31

    Variance

    DecompositionDividing each of the sums of

    squares by their respective

    degrees of freedom yields thevariances.

    Total variance= error variance

    + model variance.

    in fixed effects models

    model varianceF

    error variance!

    SStotal SSerror SSmodel

    n n k k ! 1 1

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    32/82

    32

    Proportion of Variance

    ExplainedR2 = proportion of variance

    explained.

    SStotal = SSmodel + SSerrror

    Divide all sides by SStotal

    SSmodel/SStotal

    =1 - SSError/SStotal

    R2=1 - SSError/SStotal

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    33/82

    33

    The Omnibus F test

    The omnibus F test is a test that all of the means of the

    levels of the main effects and

    as well as any interactions specifiedare not significantly different from one another.

    Suppose the model is a one way anova on breaking

    pressure of bonds of different metals.

    Suppose there are three metals: nickel, iron, and

    Copper.

    H0: Mean(Nickel)= mean (Iron) = mean(Copper)

    Ha: Mean(Nickel) ne Mean(Iron) or

    Mean(Nickel) ne Mean(Copper)or Mean(Iron) ne Mean(Copper)

    Testing different Levels of

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    34/82

    34

    Testing different Levels of

    a Factor against one

    another

    Contrast are tests of the mean

    of one level of a factor against

    other levels.

    :

    :a

    H

    H

    Q Q Q

    Q Q

    Q Q

    Q Q

    ! !

    {

    { {

    0 1 2 3

    1 2

    2 3

    1 3

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    35/82

    35

    Contrasts-contd

    A contrast statement computes

    ' '( ' )

    ( )

    L L V L LZ Z

    Frank L

    F F - - - !

    1

    The estimated V- is the generalized inverse of the

    coefficient matrix of the mixed model.

    The L vector is the kb vector.

    The numerator df is the rank(L) and the denominator

    df is taken from the fixed effects table unless otherwise

    specified.

    C i f h F

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    36/82

    36

    Construction of the F

    tests in different modelsThe F test is a ratio of two variances (Mean Squares).

    It is constructed by dividing the MS of the effect to be

    tested by a MS of the denominator term. The division

    should leave only the effect to be tested left over as a remainder.

    A Fixed Effects model F test for a = MSa/MSerror.

    A Random Effects model F test for a = MSa/MSab

    A Mixed Effects model F test for b = MSa/MSab

    A Mixed Effects model F test for ab = MSab/MSerror

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    37/82

    37

    Data format

    The data format for a GLM is that

    of wide data.

    D t F t f Mi d

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    38/82

    38

    Data Format for Mixed

    Models is Long

    C i f Wid t

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    39/82

    39

    Conversion of Wide to

    Long Data Format Click on Data in the header bar

    Then click on Restructure in the

    pop-down menu

    A restr ct re i ard

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    40/82

    40

    A restructure wizard

    appearsSelect restructure selected variables into cases

    and click onNext

    A Variables to Cases: Number of

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    41/82

    41

    A Variables to Cases: Number of

    Variable Groups dialog box appears.

    We select one and click on next.

    We select the repeated

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    42/82

    42

    p

    variables and move them

    to the target variable box

    After moving the repeated variables into the target variable

    b h fi d i bl i h Fi d i bl

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    43/82

    43

    box, we move the fixed variables into the Fixed variable

    box, and select a variable for case idin this case,

    subject.

    Then we click on Next

    A create index variables dialog box

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    44/82

    44

    appears. We leave the number of index

    variables to be created at one and click on

    next at the bottom of the box

    When the following box

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    45/82

    45

    appears we just type in

    time and select Next.

    When the options dialog box appears we select the

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    46/82

    46

    When the options dialog box appears, we select the

    option for dropping variables not selected.

    We then click on Finish.

    We thus obtain our data

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    47/82

    47

    We thus obtain our data

    in long format

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    48/82

    48

    The Mixed Model

    The Mixed Model uses long data

    format. It includes fixed and

    random effects.It can be used to model merely fixed

    or random effects, by zeroing out

    the other parameter vector.

    The F tests for the fixed, random, andmixed models differ.

    Because the Mixed Model has the

    parameter vector for both of these

    and can estimate the error

    covariance matrix for each, it can

    provide the correct standard errors

    for either thefixed or random effects.

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    49/82

    49

    The Mixed Model

    '

    y X Z

    where

    fixed effects parameter estimates X fixed effects

    Z Random effects parameter estimates

    random effects

    errors

    Variance of y V ZGZ R

    G and R require covariancestructure

    fitting

    F K I

    F

    KI

    !

    !!

    !

    !!

    ! !

    Mixed Model Theory-

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    50/82

    50

    Mixed Model Theory

    contdLittle et al.(p.139) note that u and e areuncorrelated random variables with 0

    means and covariances, G and R,

    respectively.

    ' ,

    ( ' ) '

    ' ( )

    Because the

    covariance matrix

    V ZGZ R

    the solution for

    X V X X V y

    u GZ V y X

    F

    F

    !

    !

    !

    1 1

    V-

    is a generalized inverse. Because V is usuallysingular and noninvertible AVA = V- is an

    augmented matrix that is invertible. It can later

    be transformed back to V.

    The G and R matrices must be positive definite.

    In the Mixed procedure, the covariance type of

    the random (generalized) effects defines thestructure of G and a repeated covariance type

    defines structure of R.

    Mixed Model

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    51/82

    51

    Mixed Model

    Assumptions

    0u

    EI

    !

    -

    0

    0

    u GVariance

    RI

    !

    - -

    A linear relationship between dependent and

    independent variables

    Random Effects

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    52/82

    52

    Random Effects

    Covariance Structure This defines the structure of

    the G matrix, the random

    effects, in the mixed model.

    Possible structures permitted

    by current version of SPSS:

    Scaled Identity Compound Symmetry

    AR(1)

    Huynh-Feldt

    Structures of Repeated

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    53/82

    53

    p

    effects (R matrix)-contdVariance Components

    W

    W

    WW

    ! -

    2

    1

    2

    2

    23

    2

    4

    0 0 0

    0 0 0

    0 0 0

    0 0 0

    Co pound Sy etry

    W W W W W

    W W W W W

    W W W W W

    W W W W W

    ! -

    2 2 2 2 2

    1 1 1 1

    2 2 2 2 2

    1 2 1 1

    2 2 2 2 2

    1 1 3 1

    2 2 2 2 2

    1 1 1 4

    ( )AR

    V V V

    V V V

    V V V

    V V V

    ! -

    2 3

    2

    2

    3 2

    1

    11

    1

    1

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    54/82

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    55/82

    R matrix, defines the

    correlation among

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    56/82

    56

    correlation among

    repeated random effects

    .

    .R

    W W W W

    W W W W

    W W W W

    W W W W

    W W W W

    W W W W

    !

    2

    1 1 1

    2

    1 1 1

    2

    1 1 1

    21 1 1

    2

    1 1 1

    2

    1 1 1

    One can specify the nature of the correlation among the

    repeated random effects.

    GLM Mixed Model

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    57/82

    57

    GLM Mixed Model

    The General Linear Model is a special case of the

    Mixed Model with Z = 0 (which means that

    Zu disappears from the model) and

    2R I

    W!

    Mixed Analysis of a Fixed

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    58/82

    58

    Effects model

    SPSS tests these fixed effects just as it does with the GLM

    Procedure with type III sums of squares.

    We analyze the breaking pressure of bonds made

    from three metals. We assume that we do not

    generalize beyond our sample and that our

    effects are all fixed.

    Tests of Fixed Effects is performed with the help of

    the L matrix by constructing the following F test:

    ' '[ ( ' ) ']( )

    L L X V X L LFrank L

    F F

    !1

    Numerator df = rank(L)

    Denominator df = RESID (n-rank(X)df = Satherth

    Estimation:Newton

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    59/82

    59

    Scoring

    i i sH g

    here

    g gr adient atrix of stderivatives

    H Hessian atrix of nd derivatives

    s incre ent of step parameter

    F F !

    !

    !

    !

    11

    1

    2

    Estimation: Minimization

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    60/82

    60

    of the objective functions

    _ a

    1

    1

    1

    1 1

    1 1

    1( , ): log | | log ' (1 log(2 / ))

    2 2 2

    1( , ) : log | | log | ' |

    2 2

    log ' 1 log | 2 /( ) |2 2

    ( ' ) '

    ( ' ) '

    ( '

    n nM L G R V r V r n

    nREM L G R V X V X

    n p n pr V r n p

    here r y X X V X X V y

    p rank of X

    so that the probabilities ofX V X X V y and

    GZ V

    T

    T

    F

    K

    !

    !

    !

    !

    !

    ! 1( ' ) .y X are maximizedF

    UsingNewton Scoring, the following functions are

    minimized

    Significance of

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    61/82

    61

    Parameters

    1 1

    1 1 1

    : 0

    '

    ' '

    ' '

    L is a linear combination

    Ho

    tLCL

    where

    X R X X R Z C

    Z R X ZR Z G

    F

    K

    F

    K

    F

    K

    !

    -

    - !

    !

    -

    Test one covariance

    structure against the other

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    62/82

    62

    structure against the other

    with the IC The rule of thumb is smaller is

    better

    -2LL

    AIC Akaike

    AICC Hurvich and Tsay

    BIC Bayesian Info Criterion

    Bozdogans CAIC

    Measures of Lack of fit:

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    63/82

    63

    The information Criteria-2LL is called the deviance. It is a

    measure of sum of squared errors.

    AIC = -2LL + 2p (p=# parms)

    BIC = Schwartz Bayesian Info

    criterion = 2LL + plog(n)

    AICC= Hurvich and Tsays smallsample correction on AIC: -2LL +

    2p(n/(n-p-1))

    CAIC = -2LL + p(log(n) + 1)

    Procedures for Fitting the

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    64/82

    64

    Mixed Model One can use the LR test or the

    lesser of the information criteria.

    The smaller the informationcriterion, the better the model

    happens to be.

    We try to go from a larger to asmaller information criterion

    when we fit the model.

    LR test

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    65/82

    65

    LR test

    1. To test whether one model is

    significantly better than the

    other.2. To test random effect for

    statistical significance

    3. To test covariance structureimprovement

    4. To test both.

    5. Distributed as a6. With df= p2 p1 where pi =#

    parms in model i

    G2

    Applying the LR test

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    66/82

    66

    Applying the LR test

    We obtain the -2LL from theunrestricted model.

    We obtain the -2LL from therestricted model.

    We subtract the latter from thelarger former.

    That is a chi-square with df=the difference in the number ofparameters.

    We can look this up anddetermine whether or not it isstatistically significant.

    Advantages of the Mixed

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    67/82

    67

    Model1. It can allow random effects to be

    properly specified and computed,

    unlike the GLM.2. It can allow correlation of errors,

    unlike the GLM. It therefore has

    more flexibility in modeling the error

    covariance structure.3. It can allow the error terms to exhibit

    nonconstant variability, unlike the

    GLM, allowing more flexibility in

    modeling the dependent variable.

    4. It can handle missing data, whereas

    the repeated measures GLM cannot.

    Programming A Repeated

    Measures ANOVA with

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    68/82

    68

    PROC Mixed

    Select the Mixed Linear Option in Analysis

    Move subject ID into the

    subjects box and the

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    69/82

    69

    subjects box and the

    repeated variable into the

    repeated box.

    Click on continue

    We specify subjects and

    repeated effects with the

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    70/82

    70

    next dialog box

    We set the repeated covariance type to Diagonal

    & click on continue

    Defining the Fixed

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    71/82

    71

    EffectsWhen the next dialog box appears,

    we insert the dependent Response

    variable and the fixed effects ofanxiety and tension

    Click on continue

    We select the Fixed

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    72/82

    72

    effects to be tested

    Move them into the model box,

    selecting main effects, and type III

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    73/82

    73

    sum of squares

    Click on continue

    When the Linear Mixed

    Models dialog box

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    74/82

    74

    appears, select random

    Under random effects, select

    scaled identity as covariance

    type and move subjects over into

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    75/82

    75

    yp j

    combinations

    Click on continue

    Select Statistics and check of the

    following in the dialog box that

    appears

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    76/82

    76

    appears

    Then click continue

    When the Linear Mixed

    Models box appears, click

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    77/82

    77

    ok

    You will get your tests

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    78/82

    78

    Estimates of Fixed effects

    and covariance

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    79/82

    79

    parameters

    R matrix

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    80/82

    80

    Rerun the model with

    different nested covariance

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    81/82

    81

    structures and compare theinformation criteria

    The lower the information criterion, the better fit

    the nested model has. Caveat: If the models are

    not nested, they cannot be compared with the

    information criteria.

    GLM vs. Mixed

  • 8/8/2019 SPSSMixed

    82/82

    82

    GLM has

    means

    lsmeans

    sstype 1,2,3,4

    estimates using OLS or WLSone has to program the correct F tests for randomeffects.

    losses cases with missing values.

    Mixed has

    lsmeans

    sstypes 1 and 3

    estimates using maximum likelihood, general methodsof moments, or restricted maximum likelihood

    ML

    MIVQUE0

    REML

    gives correct std errors and confidence intervals for

    random effectsAutomatically provides correct standard errors foranalysis.

    Can handle missing values