square kilometre array: project overview
DESCRIPTION
Square Kilometre Array: Project Overview. Richard Schilizzi International SKA Project Office CERN 21 January 2005. Outline. the SKA in 2 slides why build it? concept, site choice technical issues SKA governance, funding, and timeline. Square Kilometre Array. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Square Kilometre Array: Project Overview
Richard SchilizziInternational SKA Project
Office
CERN21 January 2005
Outline
the SKA in 2 slides
why build it?
concept, site choice
technical issues
SKA governance, funding, and timeline
Square Kilometre Array
extremely powerful survey telescope at radio wavelengths - capability to follow up individual objects with high angular and time resolution
~ 1 km2 collecting area; sensitivity ~100 x currently most powerful telescope (VLA)
- survey speed is 10000 x faster than VLA
wide frequency range: 0.1 – 25 GHz (goal)
wide field of view: ≥1 sq. degree at 1.4 GHz (5 x area of moon) - goal: many tens of sq. deg.
Square Kilometre Array
goal of multi-beam instrument at lower frequencies
construction cost 1 B€; operating cost 50 M€ per year
“born global”; 45 institutes in 17 countries actively involved
The history of the universe
Actually, we dont know much
Key Science Projects
probing the dark ages before the universe lit up
the evolution of galaxies and large scale structure in the universe (equation of state of dark energy)
strong field tests of gravity using pulsars and black holes
the origin and evolution of cosmic magnetism
the cradle of life; movies of planetary formation; ETI
+
exploration of the unknown
•SKA science case (eds: C. Carilli, S Rawlings) published by Elsevier in New Astronomy Reviews, vol 48, pp989-1163, December 2004 (see also www.skatelescope.org)
Galaxies in optical light and atomic hydrogen
M81 in atomic hydrogen
M81 in optical light
Equation of state of dark energy via atomic hydrogen surveys with SKA
•dark energy alters distance measures in cosmology
•power spectrum of the clustering of galaxies likely to contain a signature of acoustic oscillations seen in the CMB at time of recombination
•use scale of acoustic oscillations as a cosmological standard ruler to measure equation of state of dark energy at intermediate redshift and possibly its evolution. 0.5<z<1.5 optimal
•evolution of the HI content of the universe.
CMB
SKA HI surveys
from C. Blake, S. Rawlings et al
Pulsars tell us about gravity
•…almost Black Holes•…objects of extreme matter •…relativistic plasma physics in action•…probes of turbulent and magnetized ISM•…precision tools, e.g. - Period of B1937+21: P = 0.0015578064924327 0.0000000000000004 s Orbital eccentricity of J1012+5307: e<0.0000008•…testing ground for theories of gravity – pulsar-black hole binary•…cosmological gravitational wave detectors
Watch planets forming
Hubble Space Telescope: optical scattered light
Very Large Array: 7mm dust emission (radio)
Simulation of a gap in a protoplanetary disk caused by a forming planet
High sensitivity + high angular resolution required
Intelligent life elsewhere?
ATA
Phoenix
SKA
ATA
Phoenix
SKA
SKA as Search Engine
SKA Concept
Software: control&monitoringcorrelation calibration image formation archiving scheduling
up to at least 3000 km from inner array
~100
2000 antennas
Example SKA configuration
20% of total collecting area within 1 km diameter 50% of total collecting area within 5 km diameter 75% of total collecting area within 150 km from core maximum baselines at least 3000 km from array core
SKA in Argentina
(Landsat)
SKAin
China
KARST
Core @ VLA
SKA in North America
Antenna concepts
Large diameter reflecting flux concentrators
Small diameter dishes
Aperture phased arrays
Large adaptive reflectors Spherical telescopes Cylinders
Small dishes. I Small dishes.II Aperture array tiles
Major technical challenge for the SKA: reduce cost/m2 by a factor of 10 compared with current telescopes
Small dishes+aperture arrays in the focus
Antenna innovations
Low-cost dense arrays for aperture and focal planes
Active surfaces for large reflectors
Broadband feeds Suspended or airborne
inertial feed platform Cheap, accurate 12m
dishes using hydroforming or preloading
Data transport
High data rates– 1-2 Tb/s from stations desirable– 80 Gb/s from individual antennas in central array– “Commercially realistic” ~ 100 Gb/s for longer links– 100 Gb/s on trans-continental and trans-oceanic links allows ~ 1 “full” SKA image per minute (1TB) to be transported from imaging engine
Digital fibre links throughout array Information transport costs may dominate processing costs Local oscillator/timing is a challenge for a highly-distributed array
SKA Correlators Cross-correlation
(multiply-accumulate) is the basis of interferometry
1 MAC per sample Number of
correlations ~ N2 / 2 ~ 3 x 106
Inp. data rate ~ 3 PB/sMAC rate ~ 3 P op/s
Output data rate ~ 30 M correlations / s
Typical SKA Correlator
No. inputs(correlated entities)
N = 2500
Max.sig. Bandwidth
4 GHz
Sample rate
10 Gs/s
Input precision
8 bit
Output precision
~ 32 bit
Accumulate time
0.1 - 1 s
DSP or HPC?
DZB/Jive
SKA
LOFAR
Courtesy Eugene de Geus
Line between DSP and general purpose computers will be blurred
Post-correlation
Hardware Wide-field imaging is probably the cost driver
RFI mitigation could also be expensive
Calculate wide-field imaging costs in 2004 (from simulations) and scale with Moore’s LawAssume that ML holds for computing costs, not necessarily for per CPU costs
AND that we achieve large scale parallelization at good efficiency
Bottom line: perhaps aim for 100Pflops in 2015 for €100M If 100Pflops is beyond the state of the art in 2015, we’ll have to scale back our scientific ambitions until it is.
calibrationimagingarchivedistribution
CSKA : $3.5M
0.1
f
0.5
2B
5km
3D
12.5m
8 0.2m
500MHz
22 2010 t
3
Software
Estimating total software effort required is hard at this stage of the project
Projecting from ALMA (Atacama Large Millimeter Array) 1000 – 2000 fte
Projecting from LOFAR (Low Frequency Array) 250-500 fte
Technology
Project Management
Wideband, efficient antennas
Sensitive, low-cost receivers
Fast, long-distance, data transport
High performance DSP & computing hardware
New data processing and visualization techniques
Evolving science goals High levels of technical
risk International politics Ambitious delivery
timescale Industry liaison
Pre-competitive alliances + procurement + project delivery
Performance + Cost
SKA challenges
Who’s doing what around the world?
Europe SKA Design Study (SKADS); Pharos; LOFAR; eEVN; eMERLIN
USA NSF Technology Development Program; Allen Telescope Array; EVLA; potential site
Canada Canadian Large Adaptive Reflector
Australia small dishes+FPAs; potential site
India small dishes
China Five-hundred-metre Aperture Spherical Telescope FAST); potential site
Sth Africasmall dishes+FPAs; potential site
Argentinapotential site
SKA management structure
International SKA Steering Committee
Executive Committee
International Science Advisory
Committee
International Engineering
Advisory Committee
International Site Selection Advisory
Committee
Outreach Committee
Engineering Working Group
Site Evaluation
Working Group
Simulations Working Group
Science Working Group
International SKA Project Office
Operations Working Group
International Collaboration Working Group
8 task forces 2 task forces 1 task force6 task forces
SKA development funds
38 M€ committed to SKA development so far around the world
Current proposals for funds•Aperture Array Tiles – SKA Design Study (EU FP6 + matching: €38M, 2004-8)
•Small Dishes – SKA Technology Development Program (NSF: $US 31M, 2005-9)
•Small Dishes+AA – Australia (CSIRO: $AU 15M, 2005-8) -- South Africa (Government: R70M, 2005-8)
•Large Adaptive Reflector - LAR Technical Development (NRC: $CA 12M, 2005-9)
Development via SKA “pathfinders” comes for free telescopes that are precursors to the SKA and will prove major technology components for the SKA, eg LOFAR, EVLA, Allen Telescope Array, eMERLIN, eEVN,…
International timeline
1995-2008 technology prototyping
2005 site testing
2006 site decision (September)
2007 major external review of technical designs
2009 select technical design (may be a combination)
2009 submit proposals for phased development of SKA
2010 start construction of Phase 1 on selected site
2013 implementation readiness review for full array
2014 start construction of full array
2020 complete construction
SKA information
www.skatelescope.org
SKA newsletter 2x per year