srf niobium cavity processing, fabrication technology · 2020. 2. 3. · ulvac cr300b 5000l/min coi...
TRANSCRIPT
-
SRF Niobium cavity processing, fabrication technology
Thursday, 30 Jan. 2020 , 09:30 - 10:00
KEK: HIGH ENERGY ACCELERATOR RESEARCH ORGANIZATION, Japan
Taro Konomi
Indo-Japan Accelerator School cum Workshop (IJAS-2020), 28-31 January 2020January 29, 2020 IJAS2020 1
-
contents
January 29, 2020 IJAS2020 2
• Cavity measurement method• KEK activities.
• Standard recipe• Nitrogen doping• Nitrogen infusion
-
ILC Cost down R&D
3
e- Source
e+ Main Linac
e+ Sourcee- Main Linac
Damping Ring
• Main Linac• Length 11km x 2 (500 GeV and 250GeV ILC)
• Number of cavities 16000 (500GeV), 8000(250GeV)
• Cost 2/3 of total ILC cost (include tunnel)• Acc. Gradient as received (vertical test )
• Acc. Gradient 35MV/m ⇒ 40MV/m• Operation gradient
• Acc. Gradient 31.5MV/m ⇒ 35MV/m
N-infusion:The mechanism is still not clear
【Effect】Gradient:10% improve
⇒ # of cavities and modules will be reducedQuality factor :200% improve
⇒ cryogenic cost will be reduced
Low
loss
High gradient
S. Aderhold / A. Grassellino (TTC@Saclay)Target is 10% cost reduction
-
ILC superconducting cavity
4
1.3GHz single cell cavity
• ILC cavity is 1.3 GHz 9 cell.• We can use single cell cavity for researching surface treatment
beamRF Input
-
Cavity RF parameters
5
• ILC cavity is standing wave cavity.• Surface Electric peak located on Iris. Surface Magnetic peak located on Equator.
cell IrisEquator
1.3GHz 9cell cavity (EUV cavity)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
-600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600
Cavity Shape
Z (mm)
-2
-1
0
1
2
0
1000
2000
3000
0
5 105
1 106
1.5 106
2 106
2.5 106
Axis Elec.
Shape
Surf. Magn.
Surf. Elec.
Parameter Value
Frequency 1.3 GHz
Transit time factor 0.73
R/Q 1009 Ohm
Ep/Eacc 2.03
Hp/Eacc 4.23 mT/(MV/m)
-
BCS and residual resistance
6
1
10
100
1000
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
Meas.R
BCS
Rres
Rs
(nO
hm
)
1/T (1/K)
The RF loss of superconducting cavities is determined by top surface (100 nm). RF loss can be described as follows:
𝑅𝑆 = 𝑅𝐵𝐶𝑆 + 𝑅𝑟𝑒𝑠
𝑅𝐵𝐶𝑆 𝑇, 𝐸𝑎𝑐𝑐 = 𝐴(𝐸𝑎𝑐𝑐)𝜔2
𝑇𝑒𝑥𝑝 −
∆(𝐸𝑎𝑐𝑐)
𝑘𝑇𝑐・
𝑇𝐶
𝑇
RBCS (BCS resistance)• Exponentially dependent on temperatureRres (Residual resistance)• magnetic flux pinned in cavity• thermal conductivity (plate thickness) of material• large dust and defects on the surface• Field Emission is also included.
• Niobium superconducting cavities show characteristic changes in surface resistance around 2K.• It can be divided into BCS resistance which appears due to superconductivity and residual resistance
which does not depend on temperature.
-
Vertical high gradient test
7
• Various sensors (temperature, DC magnetic, X-ray) are mounted around the cavity to detect the quench phenomena.• Heater and solenoid coil are installed to control the external magnetic field during the superconducting transition.
Heater
Flux gate sensor
X-ray sensor
temperature sensor
Solenoid Coil
-
Flux trapping
January 29, 2020 IJAS2020 8
𝑅res =2𝑃𝑣𝐻RF
∝ 𝑁trap
Residual resistance
Normal conducting supercondcuting
-
Residual resistance (Flux trapping)
January 29, 2020 IJAS2020 9
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
750 oC (R8a_1st)
900 oC (R8b_1st)
800 oC (R8c_1st)
Ex
pu
lsio
n (
%)
delta Temperature (K)
10-9
10-8
10-7
10-6
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
750 oC (R8_1st)
900 oC (R8b_1st)
800 oC (R8c_1st)
Rs
(Oh
m)
1/T (1/K)
• Increasing the annealing temperature makes it easier to expel magnetic field.• Outer solenoid coil add the DC magnetic field.• the magnetic field was positively expelled by temperature gradient in the cavity by
the heater on beam pipe.⇒Various measurements are possible without significant difference in residual resistance.
-
High gradient test
10
109
1010
1011
1012
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
1.5K1.6K1.8K2.0K
Qo
Eacc [MV/m]
Quench
No Field Emission
R2 14th VT (standard recipe)
0
5
10
15
20
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Surface Resistance
RBCS
@2K
Rres
Rre
s, R
bcs
(n
Oh
m)
Eacc (MV/m)
• It is possible to divide into BCS resistance and residual resistance by measuring temperature dependence.• Temperature can be controlled by liquid helium pressure.
-
Sensitivity to magnetic flux
11
• Nitrogen treatment is more sensitive to DC magnetic flux than standard recipe.
-
Effect of Nitrogen treatment
12A. Grassellino et al., Supercondutor Science and Technology Vol.30Num.9 (2017)
ILC Standard recipe
standard N-dope N-infusion
Fabrication
Anneal (800℃)
Electric polishing (100um)
Final electric polishing (10~20um)
Vertical test
Assembly in cleanroom
baking(120℃)
N-process (N2@800℃) N-process(N2@120℃)
Surface treatment
-
13
KEK activities
-
Vacuum furnace
14
KEK small furnace
• Diffusion pump 1unitULVAC PFL-22 10000L/sec
• Mechanical booster pump 1unitULVAC PMB024CM 33300L/min
• Rotary pump unitULVAC PKS-070 7000L/min
• Diffusion pump with LN2 trap 1unit• Mechanical booster pump 1unit• Roots pump 1unint
Osaka Vac. RD600 500m3/h
KEK large furnace
• Turbo pump 3unintsSIMADZU TMP3202M 3000L/sec
• Scroll pump 3unintsANEST IWATA ISP500 500L/min
• Cryopump 1unint
ANELVA CAP220 10000L/sec
J-PARC furnace
14
• CRYO pump 1unintULVAC CRYO U20H 10000L/s
• Roots pump 1unint
ULVAC CR300B 5000L/min
COI furnace
2015-2016
2018-Present2016-2018
2015-2016
-
Standard recipe
15
-
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
KEK small
Vac.
Temp.
Va
cuu
m (
Pa
)
Tem
p(o
C)
Time (hour)
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
KEK Large
Vac.
Temp.
Va
cuu
m (
Pa
)
Tem
p(o
C)
Time (hour)
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
J-PARC
Vac.
Temp.
Va
cuu
m (
Pa
)
Tem
p(o
C)
Time (hour)
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
COI
Vac.
Temp.
Vacu
um
(P
a)
Tem
p(o
C)
Time (hour)
Performance of each furnace
16
Diffusion pump (10000L/sec)Diffusion pump with LN2 trap
Turbo pump (3000 L/sec x3)Cryopump (10000 L/sec)
Cryopump (10000 L/sec)
Oil free furnace can reach 1order lower
-
Residual Gas analysis
17
10-14
10-13
10-12
10-11
10-10
10-9
10-8
10-7
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
0 5 10 15 20 25
2 H218 H2O28 N232 O244 CO2
Total preussure
Ion
cu
rren
t (A
)
Tota
l pressu
re (Pa)
Time (hour)
10-14
10-13
10-12
10-11
10-10
10-9
10-8
10-7
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
0 5 10 15 20 25
2 H218 H2O28 N232 O244 CO2
Total pressure
Ion
cu
rre
nt
(A)
To
tal (P
a)
Time (hour)
J-PARC (800oC x 3h)
KEK Large (750oC x 3h)
10-14
10-13
10-12
10-11
10-10
10-9
10-8
10-7
0 20 40 60 80 100
after 800x3hafter cooling
Ion
cu
rre
nt
(A)
Mass
H2
H2O N
2CO
2
hydrocarbon
Butyl (57)
• Residual gas doesn’t show the big difference between Oil furnace and Oil free furnace.
10-14
10-13
10-12
10-11
10-10
10-9
10-8
10-7
0 20 40 60 80 100
after 750 x 3hafter cooling
Ion
cu
rre
nt
(A)
Mass
H2
H2O
N2
CO2 hydrocarbon
Butyl (57)
10-11
10-10
10-9
10-8
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
0 5 10 15 20 25
2 H218 H2O28 N232 O244 CO2
Total pressure
Ion
cu
rren
t (A
)
To
tal P
ressu
re (Pa
)
Time (hour)
10-11
10-10
10-9
10-8
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
0 20 40 60 80 100
after 800x3hafter cooling
Ion
cu
rren
t (A
)
Mass
COI (800oC x 3h)
-
Vertical test result
18
• The cavity performance with oil free furnance can reach same performance as standard without final EP.
109
1010
1011
0 10 20 30 40 50
2K VT w/ and w/o EP
R8_1st 2KR8b_1st 2K_1stR8c_1st 2KR9b_1st 2KR6 4th(J-PARC)R9a_1st (KEKS)
Qo
Eacc(MV/m)
w/ Final EP
-
XPS (X-ray photoemission spectroscopy) mea
19
280285290295
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
02270040_1a.PRO
Binding Energy (eV)
c/s
200205210215
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
x 104 02270040_1a.PRO
Binding Energy (eV)
c/s
C1s
Nb3d
before annealing
280285290295
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
02270042_1a.PRO
Binding Energy (eV)
c/s
200205210215
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
x 104 02270042_1a.PRO
Binding Energy (eV)
c/s
KEK large 750oC
280285290295
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
02270046_1a.PRO
Binding Energy (eV)
c/s
200205210215
0
5
10
15x 104 02270046_1a.PRO
Binding Energy (eV)
c/s
KEK small 900oC
280285290295
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
02270052_1a.PRO
Binding Energy (eV)
c/s
200205210215
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
x 104 02270052_1a.PRO
Binding Energy (eV)
c/s
J-PARC 800oC
• Top layer coved with carbon and oxygen.• After stripping the top surface layer (9.1 nm), clean surface less than XPS sensitivity appears.
• KEK large furnaces are contaminated with carbon more than 45 nm.
Analyzer: Versa Probe XPSX-ray source: Al K-alpha(1486.6eV), f200 um, 45 W Spattering condition: 2kV , 2mmx2mm(Spattering rate: 9.1nm/min measured by SiO2 reference sample )
0nm
9.1nm
18.2nm
27.3nm
36.4nm
45.5nm
CーNb bond
C-N bond
Nb2O5
Nb
測定:ULVAC(株)
-
Nitrogen dope
20
-
Nitrogen injection system
21
• Turbo pump 3unints: SIMADZU TMP3202M (3000L/sec x3)
• Scroll pump 3unints:ANEST IWATA ISP500 (500L/min x3)
• Cryopump 1unint:
ANELVA CAP220 (10000L/sec)
• Same system is used in all furnace.• N2 Flow is controlled by variable valve.
Portable TMP unit
Argon
bottle
Scroll Pump
Variable
Leak valveFilter
Nitrogen bottle
Scroll Pump
Pirani gauge
Turbo PumpCapacitance gauge
CCG
Turbo Pump
Pirani gauge
BA gauge
J-PARC Furnace
Nitrogen inlet line
cryopump
3 Turbo pump
3 Scroll pump
Main pumps
Portable pump unit
QMS
Leak detector
-
• Cavity is cleaned in clean room by using high pressure rinsing.• All components are transfer in clean pack.• All cavity ports are covered with niobium foil to protect inner surface from Ti contamination
because flanges are made of NbTi or Ti.
Transfer cavity
22
-
Nitrogen injection
23
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
J-PARC N-Dope
Vac.
Temp.
Vacu
um
(P
a) Tem
p (o
C)
Time(hour)
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
9 9.5 10 10.5 11
J-PARC N-Dope
Vac.
Temp.
Vacu
um
(P
a) T
emp
(oC
)
Time(hour)
20 min.
Zoom
• 800℃ , N2 pressure ~3Pa、injection time several minutes. • After heat process, apply EP (5um ~10um ) to remove N2
rich layer.
-
VT results N-dope
24
109
1010
1011
0 10 20 30 40 50
R6 single cell
N-Dope @ J-PARCReference (ILC recipe)
Qo
Eacc(MV/m)
No F.E.
Limited by Quench
Without N-dope↓ Without N-dope
↓
KEK Large KEK Small
3.3Pa N-dope, 2min
J PARC(N-Dope 1st trial )
2.7Pa N-dope, 20min
↑Without N-dope
2.7Pa N-dope, 20min
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
J-PARC N-Dope
Vac.
Temp.
Va
cuu
m (
Pa
) Tem
p (o
C)
Time(hour)
Although many surface treatments in KEK furnaces did not work, we easily succeeded by using oil free furnace.
-
N density measured by GD-OES
25
• Density profile of nitrogen was not changed ⇒Impurities (carbon, oxygen,… ) degrader the cavity performance
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
KEK Large Nitorogen
#1_NoHeating_N#12_KEKL_750anneal_N#2_KEKL_Ndope_N
den
sity
(a
.u.)
depth (um)
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
JPARC Nitrogen
#20_JPARC_800anneal_N#3_JPARC_Ndope_N
den
sity
(a
.u.)
depth (um)
Rem
ove b
y EP
Rem
ove b
y EP
-
Nitrogen infusion
26
-
COI furnace
27
• We have been studying nitrogen infusion using J-PARC vacuum furnace and COI vacuum furnace.• For nitrogen infusion, the quality of the degree of vacuum is important because the heat treatment in a
vacuum furnace becomes the final surface of RF.• The COI furnace is set up so that it can analyze the introduced gas.
RGA
TMP
RGA
TMPfurnace
Furnace RGA
Variable valve
Angle valve
Variable valve
N2 flow (0.53 SLM)
N2 line RGA
N2injection panel
-
N2 Purity monitor
28
• Purity was monitored using RGA while injecting nitrogen gas so as to keep the vacuum furnace at 3.3 Pa.• The N2 cylinder is guaranteed 6N purity.• Other gas is the background level of RGA.
10-13
10-12
10-11
10-10
10-9
10-8
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
21828324044
Ion
cu
rren
t (A
)
Time (hour)
N2 line RGA
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
10-7
10-5
10-3
10-1
101
103
105
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
20190421_tempandvac_v2Temp. (Left back)
Pressure (Pa)
Tem
per
atu
re (
oC
)
Pressu
re (P
a)
Time (hour)
10-9
10-8
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
20190421 furnace RGA dataMass 2Mass 18Mass 28Mass 32Mass 40Mass 44
Ion
curr
ent
(A)
Time (hour)
-
Purity monitor
29
• Even after open to the atmosphere, it is sufficiently low except for hydrogen (~5N).• After heating (1100 ° C x 3h), the purity is initially poor.
• N2 flow seems to carry impurity gas covered the heater or inner surface of furnace
After 1100℃ annealing
10-9
10-8
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
130 135 140 145 150 155 160 165 170
Mass 2
Mass 18
Mass 28
Mass 32
Mass 40
Mass 44
Ion
curr
ent
(A)
Time (hour)
10-9
10-8
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Mass 2Mass 18Mass 28Mass 32Mass 40Mass 44
Ion
curr
ent
(A)
Time (hour)
After open to airN2 flow N2 flowN2 flow
-
N2 infusion @COI
30
10-10
10-9
10-8
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
100 120 140 160 180 200 220
20190128 AES018
Mass 2Mass 18Mass 28Mass 32Mass 40Mass 44
Inte
nsi
ty (
a.u
.)
Time (hour)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
100 120 140 160 180 200 220
20190125 AES018
Temp.
Vac.
Tem
per
atu
re (
Pa
)
Pressu
re (Pa
)
Time (hour)
Monitored with variable valveN2:3.3Pa x48h
-
Result of N-infusion @COI
31
Unfortunately, FE masked high gradient performance, but the Q value was improved at low gradient. A big difference couldn’t seen in BCS resistance. Residual resistance become lower
108
109
1010
1011
1012
10-1
100
101
102
103
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Standard_QoNinf_Qo
Standard_XrayNinf_Xray
Qo
Xra
y (u
Sv/h
)Eacc (MV/m)
0
5
10
15
20
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Standard_RresNinf_Rres
Standard_RbcsNinf_Rbcs
0
5
10
15
20
RB
CS &
Rre
s (n
Oh
m)
Eacc (MV/m)
-
Surface analysis of N infusion
32
10-1
100
101
102
103
0 5 10 15 20 25
typical
C_N307_20190110_800Canneal_R6C_N301_20181120_Ninf120C_R8C_N302_20181218_Ninf160C_R9bC_N207_20181015_Ninf200C_sampleonly
Inte
nsi
ty (
norm
ali
zed
by
Nb
)
Depth (nm)
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
0 5 10 15 20 25
typical
Nb2+O5_N307_20190110_800Canneal_R6Nb2+O5_N301_20181120_Ninf120C_R8Nb2+O5_N302_20181218_Ninf160C_R9bNb2O5_N207_20181015_Ninf200C_sampleonly
Inte
nsi
ty (
no
rma
lize
d b
y N
b)
Depth (nm)
10-1
100
101
102
0 5 10 15 20 25
typical
Nb+O_N307_20190110_800Canneal_R6Nb+O_N301_20181120_Ninf120C_R8Nb+O_N302_20181218_Ninf160C_R9bNbO_N207_20181015_Ninf200C_sampleonly
Inte
nsi
ty (
no
rma
lize
d b
y N
b)
Depth (nm)
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
0 5 10 15 20 25
typical
Nb+N_N307_20190110_800Canneal_R6Nb+N_N301_20181120_Ninf120C_R8Nb+N_N302_20181218_Ninf160C_R9bNbN_N207_20181015_Ninf200C_sampleonly
Inte
nsi
ty (
no
rma
lized
by
Nb
)
Depth (nm)
• Holding temperature during the nitrogen injection was changed.
• The nitrogen loading appears to increase with temperature.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
10-8
10-6
10-4
10-2
100
102
380 400 420 440 460 480 500
20181015 200 oC N-infusion
Temp.
Vac.
Tem
per
atu
re (
oC
)
Vacu
um
(Pa
)
Time (hour)
Example: 200℃ N-infusion
Changed this temperature
-
Summary
33
• FNAL has developed nitrogen doping that greatly improves the Q value and nitrogen infusion that improves the Q value and RF critical magnetic field.• Nitrogen dope contains nitrogen to a depth of ~ 30um,• Nitrogen infusion has the difference that nitrogen enters up to ~ 10 nm.
• Nitrogen doping has also been succeeded at KEK.
• Vacuum furnace cleanliness is more important for N-infusion. • Sample measurement requires top surface analysis, which is difficult to analyze.