srhcp_market_analysis_final_103012

55
SACRAMENTO REGION HEALTH CARE PARTNERSHIP / 2012 A Market Analysis of the Sacramento Region Primary Care Safety Net A Sierra Health Foundation initiative Preparing for Transformation: Rethinking, Revitalizing and Reforming the Sacramento Region’s Health Care System

Upload: abraham-daniels

Post on 14-Apr-2017

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O NH E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P / 2 0 1 2

    A Market Analysis of the Sacramento Region Primary Care Safety Net

    A Sierra Health Foundation initiative

    Preparing for Transformation: Rethinking, Revitalizing and Reforming the Sacramento Regions Health Care System

    S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O NH E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P / 2 0 1 2

    A Strategic Plan for the Sacramento Region

    A Sierra Health Foundation initiative

    Preparing for Transformation: Rethinking, Revitalizing and Reforming the Sacramento Regions Health Care System

  • S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P

    This market analysis of the Sacramento Region primary care safety net system was commissioned and funded by Sierra Health Foundation with additional funding from

    The California Endowment and Sacramento Region Community Foundation. The analysis was conducted by The Abaris Group, Public Health Institute and Hatches Consulting.

    Consultant Team

    The Abaris Group

    Mike Williams, MPA/HSA, Project Lead

    Marsha Regenstein, PhD

    Alaina Dall

    Juliana Boyle, MBA

    Mark Zocchi

    Chuck Baucom

    Public Health Institute

    Carmen Nevarez, MD, MPH

    Marisel Brown, MPH, MSBA

    Art Chen, MD

    Elaine Zahnd, PhD

    Nancy Shemick, MPP

    Amy Neuwelt, MPH

    Heather Bonser-Bishop

    Hatches Consulting

    Barrett Hatches, PhD

    The Abaris Group, Public Health Institute, Hatches Consulting, Mighty Pen Writing & Editing and Sierra Health Foundation contributed to the writing and editing of this market analysis.

  • S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P

    Table of ContentsAcknowledgements 1

    LetterfromtheFunders 4

    LetterfromCongresswomanDorisMatsui 5

    ExecutiveSummary 6

    ProjectOverview 9

    HowThisReportWasDeveloped 11

    TheSacramentoRegionsSafetyNetPopulation 13

    HealthReformBackgroundandImplications 15

    SafetyNetSnapshot 19

    CurrentSafetyNetProviders 20

    EmergencyDepartmentsOverusedforPrimaryCare 23

    DetailedDataAnalysisFindings 23

    SafetyNetDemand 23

    Preventable/AvoidableEmergencyDepartmentVisits 25

    SafetyNetCapacity 26

    HealthProfessionalShortageAreas 29

    SafetyNetProjections 31

    SafetyNetFunding 34

    StakeholderFeedback 36

    ConclusionsandNextSteps 38

    Appendices 1.GlossaryofTerms 41

    2.SacramentoRegionCommunityHealthIndicators 44

    Available Online at www.sierrahealth.org/healthcarepartnershipCommunityHealthCenterSiteVisitsandInterviews

    CommunityPhysicianDiscussionGroupInterviews

    HealthCenterConsumerFocusGroupInterviews

    SACOGTransitStudyHighlights

    CountyProgramsfortheUnderserved

    SacramentoRegionHealthCarePartnershipMarketAnalysisChartbook

  • S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P | P a g e 1

    AcknowledgementsThank you to the many stakeholders who contributed their time, expertise and involvement with the development of this market analysis. Sincere apologies to anyone who may have been inadvertently left off this list.

    JonathanLehrman,MDAccessElDorado

    ChristineSisonAccessElDorado

    SandiSnelgroveAnotherChoiceAnotherChance

    SeanAthaAnthemBlueCross

    KerryBrownAnthemBlueCross

    KimWilliamsBuildingHealthyCommunities

    JosephHafkenschielCaliforniaAssociationforHealthServicesatHome

    ChristineSmithCaliforniaConsortiumforUrbanIndianHealth

    RosanaJacksonCaliforniaDepartmentofPublicHealth

    LeticiaAlejandrezCaliforniaFamilyResourceAssociation

    DorethaWilliams-FlournoyCaliforniaInstituteforMentalHealth

    CarolLeeCaliforniaMedicalAssociationFoundation

    ElissaMaasCaliforniaMedicalAssociationFoundation

    EdMendozaCaliforniaOfficeofStatewideHealthPlanningandDevelopment

    RonaldSpingarn CaliforniaOfficeofStatewideHealthPlanningandDevelopment

    JonathanTeague CaliforniaOfficeofStatewideHealthPlanningandDevelopment

    SandraPerezCaliforniaOfficeofthePatientAdvocate

    MarthaTorres-MontoyaCaliforniaOfficeofthePatientAdvocate

    KiranGrewalCaliforniaPharmacistAssociation

    DeborahOrtizCaliforniaPrimaryCareAssociation

    DavidQuackenbushCaliforniaPrimaryCareAssociation

    SteveBarrowCaliforniaStateRuralHealthAssociation

    AlHernandez-SantanaCalifoniaStateRuralHealthAssociation

    MartyKealeCapitolCommunityHealthNetwork

    AshelyTolleCapitolCommunityHealthNetwork

    JohnAdamsCASAElDorado

    DebbieBrussard CenterforAIDSResearch,Education&Services

    RobertKamrath CenterforAIDSResearch,Education&Services

    JanetParkerCenterforAIDSResearch,Education&Services

    WendyPetkoCenterforCommunityHealthandWell-Being,Inc.

    KarenShoreCenterforHealthImprovement

    TaraDavisCenterForInnovativeCommunitySolutions

    SheliaDuruisseau-SidqeCenterForInnovativeCommunitySolutions

    AutumnValerioCenterforMulticulturalDevelopment

    CathyFreyCentralValleyHealthNetwork

    LisaDaviesChapa-DeIndianHealthProgram,Inc.

    RobinAffrimeCommuniCareHealthCenters

    LeonSchimmel,MDCommuniCareHealthCenters

    AlanLangeCommunityLinkCapitalRegion

    ArielLovettCommunityRecoveryResources

    BrianGraafCommunityResourceProject

    KellyBennett-WoffordCovertheKids

    JoilXiongCovertheKids

    MichaelNegrete,PharmD CPhAandCaliforniaNorthstateUniversity

    KaciBaldiDignityHealth

    RosemaryYountsDignityHealth

    LizDowellDivideReadyby5

    JohnBachman,PhDElDoradoCommunityHealthCenter

    JamesEllsworth ElDoradoCommunityHealthCenter

  • Respi te Par tnership Col laborat ive | P a g e 6

    DeborahPalmer ElDoradoCounty

    OliviaByron-Cooper,MPH ElDoradoCountyHealth&HumanServicesAgency

    JoanMeisWilsonElDoradoCountyHealth&HumanServicesAgency

    MichaelUngeheuer,RN,MN,PHNElDoradoCountyHealth&HumanServicesAgency

    ChristyWhiteElDoradoCountyHealth&HumanServicesAgency

    ChristineHoyt ElDoradoCountyPublicHealth

    AlexBolteElHogarMentalHealthandCommunityServices

    EileenSnickerFeministWomensHealthCenter

    RickAlfordFirst5ElDorado

    KathleenWalker First5ElDorado

    DebraPayneFirst5Sacramento

    JulieGallelo First5Yolo

    DebraOto-Kent HealthEducationCouncil

    RichardIkeda,MDHealthforAll

    EffieRugglesHealthNetofCalifornia

    MarthaGeraty HealthNetStateHealthPrograms

    ScottSeamonsHospitalCouncilofNorthernandCentralCalifornia

    JenniferAblogKaiserPermanente

    EllenBrownKaiserPermanente

    StephanieLandrum KaiserPermanente

    MyrnaRivas KaiserPermanente

    PatriciaRodriguez,RN,MPHKaiserPermanente

    CarolSerreKaiserPermanente

    ChaosarnChao LaoFamilyCommunityDevelopment,Inc.

    ElisaHerrera LatinoLeadershipCouncil

    BobLong,MD LatinoLeadershipCouncil

    BillKennedy LegalServicesofNorthernCalifornia

    FrankLemus,PhDLemusConsultingGroup

    JenniferDwight-FrostMarshallMedicalCenter

    SherryGeurinMarshallMedicalCenter

    VernSaharaMarshallMedicalCenter

    DennyPowellMercyGeneral

    MarciaWells MercyNorwoodFamilyClinic

    TonyBrowneMidtownMedicalCenterforChildren&Families

    ElizabethCassin MidtownMedicalCenterforChildren&Families

    RobertReichMidtownMedicalCenterforChildren&Families

    RichardDanaMutualAssistanceNetwork

    LeonardRanasinghe,PhD,MDNatomasCrossroadsClinic

    BarbaraSayre-Thompson NCADDSacramento

    GailCatlinNonprofitResourceCenter

    RichardBurton,MD,MPHPlacerCountyHealth&HumanServices

    JamesGandley,DDS,MPHPlacerCountyHealth&HumanServices

    ElizabethFraley PlannedParenthoodMarMonte

    RaquelSimentalPlannedParenthoodMarMonte

    JenniferStorkPlannedParenthoodMarMonte

    LindaWilliams PlannedParenthoodMarMonte

    LorraineRinkerRinkerandAssociates

    AliciaRossSacramentoAreaCongregationsTogether

    AllisonSwanSacramentoAreaCongregationsTogether

    NenickVuSacramentoAreaCongregationsTogether

    JoeConcannonSacramentoAreaCouncilofGovernments

    GordonGarrySacramentoAreaCouncilofGovernments

    MonicaHernndezSacramentoAreaCouncilofGovernments

    RebeccaThorntonSloan SacramentoAreaCouncilofGovernments

    SharonSprowlsSacramentoAreaCouncilofGovernments

    DiAnneBrownSacramentoCityUnifiedSchoolDistrict

    JerryBliatoutSacramentoCommunityClinic/HALO

    MiguelSuarezSacramentoCommunityClinic/HALO

    S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P | P a g e 2

  • Respi te Par tnership Col laborat ive | P a g e 7

    BradHudsonSacramentoCounty

    PaulLakeSacramentoCountyDepartmentofHumanAssistance

    SandyDamiano,PhDSacramentoCountyHealthServices

    MarciaJo,PhD SacramentoCountyHealthServices

    AnnEdwardsSacramentoCounty,CountywideServices

    BruceWagstaffSacramentoCountyCountywideServices

    KathyHarwellSacramentoCountyHealth&HumanServices

    OliviaKasirye,MD,MS SacramentoCountyHealth&HumanServices

    GlennahTrochett,MDSacramentoCountyHealth&HumanServices

    DyannWolfeSacramentoFamilyMedicalCenter

    KendraBridges SacramentoHousingAlliance

    LisaBatesSacramentoHousingRedevelopmentAgency

    EricEnriquezSacramentoNativeAmericanHealthCenter,Inc.

    BrittaGuerrero SacramentoNativeAmericanHealthCenter,Inc.

    AllieShilinSacramentoNativeAmericanHealthCenter,Inc.

    PriscillaEnriquezSacramentoRegionCommunityFoundation

    JohnChuck,MDSerotoninSurgeCharities

    WilliamSandbergSierraSacramentoValleyMedicalSociety

    KristineWallachSierraSacramentoValleyMedicalSociety

    AileenWetzelSierraSacramentoValleyMedicalSociety

    KellyBrenkSutterHealth

    TomGagenSutterHealth

    HollyHarperSutterHealth

    KeriThomasSutterHealth

    JoseAlbertoArevalo,MDSutterIndependentPhysicians

    MarlonCuellar TheCaliforniaEndowment

    ChristineTienTheCaliforniaEndowment

    EricFimbresTheEffort,Inc.

    J.RodneyKennedyTheEffort,Inc.

    BunryPinTheEffort,Inc.

    JonathanPorteus,PhDTheEffort,Inc.

    TomStanko,MDTheGatheringInnClinic

    GraceRubensteinTheSacramentoBee

    WarrenBarnesUCBerkeleySoPH/RightCareInitiative

    SheltonDuruisseau,PhDUCDavisHealthSystem

    LauraNiznikUCDavisHealthSystem

    ClairePomeroy,MD,MBAUCDavisHealthSystem

    CarolynRamirezUCDavisHealthSystem

    RobertWaste,PhDUCDavisHealthSystem

    CongresswomanDorisMatsuiU.S.HouseofRepresentatives

    NathanDietrich OfficeofCongresswomanDorisMatsui

    KariLacostaOfficeofCongresswomanDorisMatsui

    DaleAinsworth,PhDValleyVision

    CarlHeardWesternCliniciansNetwork

    CharlaParkerWesternCliniciansNetwork

    CasieParrishWesternCliniciansNetwork

    AlexanderGiloffWesternSierraMedicalCenter

    SherBarberWindYouthServices

    KimSudermanYoloCountyAlcohol,DrugandMentalHealth

    JillCook,MS,RN,PHNYoloCountyPublicHealth

    TraciLucchesiYoloCountyPublicHealth

    TrishaStanionisYoloFamilyServiceAgency

    GregBergner,MD

    DawnDunlapConsultant

    GrantlandJohnsonFormerSecretaryofCaliforniaHealthandHumanServicesAgency

    SierraHealthFoundation:

    ChetHewitt

    DianeLittlefield

    RobertPhillips

    AbrahamDaniels

    SusanKing

    KatyPasini

    S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P | P a g e 2 S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P | P a g e 3

  • Respi te Par tnership Col laborat ive | P a g e 6S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P | P a g e 4

    Letter from the Funders

    DearColleagues,

    In2011,SierraHealthFoundationlaunchedtheSacramentoRegionHealthCarePartnershipwiththegoalof

    findingwaystoimproveaccess,carecoordinationandthequalityoftheregionsprimarycaresystem,witha

    specificfocusoncommunityhealthcenters.Partnersinthisinitiativeincludedleadersfromcommunityclinics,

    healthsystems,healthplans,associationsandcounties,aswellasphysicians,policymakersandothers.The

    timingwasright,astheimplementationoftheAffordableCareActin2014offersanunprecedented

    opportunitytoextendhealthinsurancecoveragetothosecurrentlyuninsured.

    InordertofullyrealizetheopportunitiesoftheACA,weneedtounderstandboththestrengthsandthe

    weaknessesofthecurrentregionalsystemthatservesresidentsofElDorado,Placer,SacramentoandYolo

    counties.Accordingly,thePartnershipcommissionedtwostudies:amarketanalysisthatidentifiesthecurrent

    servicecapacitywithintheprimarycaresafetynet,andastrategicplantodevelopanintegratedhealthcare

    deliverysystemmodelthatefficientlylinkscommunityhealthclinicstoregionalproviders,thusexpanding

    accesstohighqualityandculturallysensitiveservicesforlow-incomeadultsandchildreninourregion.The

    CaliforniaEndowmentandSacramentoRegionCommunityFoundationwerefundingpartnersforthemarket

    analysisandstrategicplanningprocess.

    Wearepleasedtosharewithyouthemarketanalysisandthestrategicplan,whichilluminatewhatwecando

    asaregiontoprepareforthetransformativeimpactsofhealthcarereform.Thestressesonourregionalsafetynet

    aresubstantial;atthesametime,wearegalvanizedbythevisionofacollaborative,accessible,highqualityand

    culturallycompetentprimarycarehealthsystemthatisoutcome-basedandsustainable.Thatisavisionwecan

    andmustsupport,individuallyandcollectively.

    Weofferthesereportstoinspireconversationandactionaboutthewaystocreateahighqualitypatientcare

    systemthatwillbeready,willingandabletoserveournewlyinsuredresidents.Thisisatimeoftremendous

    challengeandopportunity,andwemusttakewisestepstogetheraswecreateastrongerandwidersafetynet

    toeffectivelyserveallofourresidents.

    Sincerely,

    ChetP.HewittDr.RobertK.Ross RuthBlank

    President and CEO President and CEO CEO

    Sierra Health Foundation The California Endowment Sacramento Region Community Foundation

  • Respi te Par tnership Col laborat ive | P a g e 7S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P | P a g e 4 S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P | P a g e 5

  • Executive SummaryPreparing the Sacramento Region for the transformative impacts of health care reform

    Is the Sacramento Region ready for health care reform? Can the Sacramento Region primary care safety net absorb a dramatic influx of newly insured patients in 2014? How can the Sacramento Region maximize the benefits afforded by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) to improve access and quality for the Sacramento Regions most vulnerable residents? What resources (ACA and other) can the Sacramento Region apply to bolster safety net functioning to better meet current and looming demands?

    ACA offers an unprecedented opportunity to rethink, revitalize and reform Sacramentos regional health care system. But even without this law, the four counties that make up the region El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento and Yolo would be wise to consider addressing weakness in their primary care system. Why? Because the capacity of the institutions that represent the medical safety net is directly linked to its ability to meet the health care needs of the regions most vulnerable residents. As this report makes clear, all of the health care stakeholders in the Sacramento Region must work together to close the gaps between residents health care needs and the systems ability to efficiently meet them.

    This market analysis and a companion regional strategic plan conclude the initial work of the Sacramento Region Health Care Partnership. Our goals for this work were straightforward: to better understand the dynamic affecting the safety net system and develop a regional strategic plan to foster the development of an integrated health care delivery system that efficiently links community health centers to regional providers. It was the collective hope of the many groups and individuals who participated in this work that it would result in expanded access to high quality services for low-income adults and children in the Sacramento Region. The market analysis identifies the Sacramento Region safety nets strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and stressors. Armed with these insights, the Sacramento Region can

    better meet its communities health care needs today to improve health, while preparing itself for vastly increased demand under ACA.

    Health Care Reform Background and Context

    The passage of the Patient ProtectionandAfforable CareAct(ACA)

    1, as amended by the Reconciliation Act

    of 2012 (P.L. 111-152) collectively referred to as the health reform law transforms the delivery and financing of the health care system. The intent of ACA is to expand health insurance coverage while also reforming the health care delivery system to improve quality and value. ACA also includes provisions to eliminate disparities in health care, strengthen public health care access, invest in the expansion and improvement of the health care workforce, and encourage consumer and patient wellness in both the community and the workplace. ACA is investing $11 billion in new mandatory federal spending through 2015 to support the expansion of health center capacity for the millions of uninsured Americans who will be eligible for Medicaid or private coverage beginning in 2014.

    The vehicle for this funding is the Community Health Centers and National Health Service Corps Trust Fund, which was created by the passage of ACA. This new trust fund changes the way new health center funding is appropriated. Instead of Congress making the determination of funding levels each year, the Department of Health and Human Services will be able to directly appropriate the health center funds once the federal budget is passed and signed into law. The thrust of the Health Center Trust Fund is to expand health centers capacity and to invest in health centers as a strategy for building health care capacity in the U.S.

    2

    According to the Congressional Budget Office, the law will increase coverage to about 94 percent of Americans, while slowing the rate of growth in federal health expenditures by $124 billion over the next decade.

    Respi te Par tnership Col laborat ive | P a g e 6S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P | P a g e 6

    1^Pub.L.111-148,124Stat.119,tobecodifiedasamendedatscatteredsectionsoftheInternalRevenueCodeandin42U.S.C.2KaiserCommissiononMedicaidandUninsured:CommunityHealthCenters:TheChallengeofGrowingtomeettheneedforprimarycaremedicallyunderservedcommunities.http://www.kff.org/uninsured/upload/8098-02.pdf

  • 227,500 newly insured patients will overwhelm our regions safety net.

    Table 1.

    IntheSacramentoRegion(ElDorado,Placer,Sacramento

    andYolocounties),aprojected227,500non-elderlyadults

    andchildrenwillbeeligibleforhealthcoveragethrough

    expandedMedi-Calbenefitsorsubsidizedprivateinsurance

    (healthcareexchanges).

    Significant Opportunities for Improvement

    Thehealthreformlawpermanentlyauthorizesandexpands

    communityhealthcentersandtheNationalHealthServices

    Corps.Thehealthreformlawprovidesatotalof$1.5

    billioninnewfundingthrough2015totrainmore

    primarycareprovidersviascholarshipsandloanrepayment

    assistance.ACAinvestmentswilldoublecommunityhealth

    centercapacity.Throughfederalprogramsandgrantsto

    states,thehealthreformlawwillhelpexpandthenations

    healthworkforcefromphysiciansandnursestopublic

    healthprofessionalsthroughscholarshipsandlocal

    repaymentassistance.Thelawalsoaimstoimprovethe

    diversityofthehealthcareworkforcetodelivercarethatis

    appropriatefortheentirepopulation.

    Inshort,thelawprovidesmanyopportunitiestostrengthen

    thesafetynet,butalsoposesrealchallenges.Meetingthe

    vastlyincreaseddemandforhealthcareservicesisnosmall

    task.Throughoutthenation,communitiesareatdifferent

    pointsinpreparingfortheincreasednumberofresidents

    coveredthroughMedicaidexpansionmandatedbyACA.

    The Role of Sacramento Region Health Care Partnership

    Attherequestofseveralcommunitystakeholders,in

    2011SierraHealthFoundationlaunchedtheSacramento

    RegionHealthCarePartnership.Theinitiativegrewout

    ofconversationswithpolicymakers,healthsystemsand

    communityhealthcenters,whoapproachedSierraHealth

    Foundationtoserveasintermediaryinpreparingthe

    SacramentoRegion,whichincludesElDorado,Placer,

    SacramentoandYolocounties,toimplementhealthreform.

    TheHealthCarePartnershipcreatestheregionsfirst

    coordinatedphilanthropic,countyagency,nonprofit

    providerandcommunityhealthcentereffortfocused

    solelyonregionalhealthcarereformpreparedness

    andimplementation.

    TheSacramentoRegionHealthCarePartnershipincludesa

    broadrangeofhealthcarepartnersandleadersthroughout

    theSacramentoRegion,includingcommunityhealth

    centers,healthsystems,healthplans,associationsand

    counties,aswellasphysicians,policymakersandother

    nonprofitsthatworkwithinthesafetynet.SierraHealth

    Foundation,TheCaliforniaEndowmentandSacramento

    RegionCommunityFoundationarefundingpartners

    ofthemarketanalysisandregionalstrategicplan.

    The Health Care Partnerships Goal

    TheSacramentoRegionHealthCarePartnershipsgoalisto

    findwaystoimproveaccess,carecoordinationandquality

    oftheregionssafetynetprimarycaresystemthroughinput

    fromhealthcareandcivicleadersandotherstakeholders.

    TheHealthCarePartnershipsultimatevisionistoincrease

    andimproveprimarycareaccessandqualityforindividuals

    andfamiliesinlow-incomecommunitiesandcommunities

    ofcolorinElDorado,Placer,SacramentoandYolocounties.

    Betteraccesstoprimarycarewilllowerthecostofhealth

    careoverall,betterallocatehealthcareresources(e.g.,reduce

    expensive,unnecessaryacutecareresponsestopreventable

    chronicdisease)andimprovepublichealthinthe

    SacramentoRegion.

    Respi te Par tnership Col laborat ive | P a g e 7S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P | P a g e 6 S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P | P a g e 7

    Sacramento Region Insurance Coverage 2009 and 2014

    Source: MCIC Chicago, 2012

    Insurance 2009 Percent Movement 2014 Percent

    Individual 103,973 4.9% 109,610 213,583 10.0%

    Medicare 248,432 11.6% - 248,432 11.6%

    Medi-Cal 369,057 17.3% 117,947 487,004 22.8%

    Uninsured 303,306 14.2% (227,557) 75,749 3.6%

    Total 2,132,796 - - 2,132,796 -

    Employer 1,108,028 52.0% - 1,108,028 52.0%

    2014 Focus Group Demographic Data

    Sacramento Region Median Household Income & Federal Poverty Levels, 2010

    Note: For purposes of comparison the 2010 FPL is shown. 2012 FPL is $11,170 for individuals and $23,050 for families of four.

    Sources: 2010 American Community Survey (ACS); Health and Human Services Poverty Guidelines

    El Dorado County $66,129

    Placer County $67,884

    Sacramento County $52,709

    Yolo County $55,798

    California $57,708

    100 Percent $10,830 $22,050

    200 Percent $21,660 $44,100

    Median HouseholdIncome 2010 Federal

    Poverty Levels

    Individual Four-personFamily

    2524

    -Total Number of Returned Demographic Forms -

    Age71muminiM -86mumixaM -

    Average 24egA -

    Gender%238elaM%4661elameF

    Highest Level of Educaon Completed8th grade or %213sselSome high school, but didn't graduate 3 12%High school graduate or %426DEGSome college or 2-year degree 9 36%4-year college %41eergedMore than 4-year college degree 2 8%

    Combined Household IncomeLess than %0401000,01$More than $10,000 but less than $13,000 5 20%More than $13,000 but less than $15,000 3 12%More than $15,000 but less than $20,000 2 8%More than $20,000 but less than $30,000 2 8%More than $30,000 but less than $40,000 1 4%More than $40,000 but less than $50,000 1 4%More than $50,000 0 0%Don't %00wonk

    Race/Ethnicity%238etihW

    Black or African- %827naciremA%41naisA%238cinapsiH

    Insurance StatusDo not have %827ecnarusniHave %8671ecnarusnI

    Insurance TypeEmployer- %00desab

    %413eracideMMedi- %7641laC

    %012ISSOther %012)PIHCY(

    Total Number of Parcipants

    Diabetes, Adults, Sacramento Region, 2009Asthma, Ages 1 Year and Older, Sacramento Region, CHIS 2009

    Selected Characteristics of Individuals = 300 percent FPL 16.7 196,000 Insurance Status Insured 16.4 306,000 Uninsured 14.3 30,000

    Total Reporng Asthma

    16.2

    336,000

    Source: 2009 California Health Interview SurveySource: 2009 California Health Interview Survey

    Italics are signicantly dierent rates.

    Populaon Group Percent Pop. EsmateAge Group (Years)

    18-24

    25-64 5.5* 60,000

    65 or older 23.8* 58,000

    Gender

    Male 8.3 62,000

    Female 6.8 56,000

    Race/Ethnicity

    White 5.7* 56,000

    Lano 15.2* 40,000

    African American

    AI/AN

    Asian/Nave Hawaiian/PI

    Two or More Races(Non-Lano) Immigrant Status

    U.S. Born 7.4 96,000

    Foreign Born

    Federal Poverty Level

    0-99 percent FPL

    100-199 percent FPL 10.8 25,000

    200-299 percent FPL 8.1 20,000

    >= 300 percent FPL 5.8 54,000

    Insurance Status

    Insured

    Uninsured

    Total Diagnosed with Diabetes

    7.5 118,000

    Obese (BMI>30), Adults, Sacramento Region, 2009

    Source: 2009 California Health Interview Survey

    Populaon Group Percent Pop. EsmateAge Group (Years)

    High Blood Pressure, Adults, Sacramento Region, 2009

    Source: 2009 California Health Interview Survey

    Populaon Group Percent Pop. Esmate

    Age Group (Years)

    18-24

    25-64 22.1* 241,000

    65 or older 57.6* 140,000

    Gender

    Male 25.5 193,000

    Female 24.7 200,000

    Race/Ethnicity

    White 26.9 265,000

    Lano 22.6 60,000

    African American 37.6 36,000

    AI/AN

    Asian 13.2 21,000

    Two or More Races (Non-Lano)

    24.3 10,000

    Immigrant Status

    U.S. Born 26.3 339,000

    Foreign Born 19.4 54,000

    Federal Poverty Level

    0-99 percent FPL 24.1 41,000

    100-199 percent FPL 28.5 66,000

    200-299 percent FPL 23.5 57,000

    >= 300 percent FPL 24.8 228,000

    Insurance Status

    Insured 26.6* 367,000

    Uninsured 13.9* 27,000

    Total Diagnosed with HBP

    25.1 393,000

    18-24 16.2 38,000 25-64 26.3 287,000 65 or older 25.9 63,000 Gender Male 25.9 196,000 Female 23.6 192,000Race/Ethnicity White 22.5* 221,000 Lano 36.4* 96,000 African American 48.1* 46,000 AI/AN

    El Dorado County Community Health Center El Dorado FQHC

    Placerville Health and Wellness Center El Dorado FQHC

    Birth and Family Health Center Sacramento FQHC

    The Effort Medical Clinic Sacramento FQHC

    The Effort Oak Park Community Health Center Sacramento FQHC

    The Effort South Valley Center Sacramento FQHC

    Sacramento Nave American Health Center, Inc. Sacramento FQHC

    Suer Seniorcare Sacramento FQHC

    Suer Seniorcare Site II Sacramento FQHC

    Davis Community Clinic Yolo FQHC

    Peterson Clinic Yolo FQHC

    Salud Clinic Yolo FQHC

    Winters Healthcare Clinic Yolo FQHC

    Health for All, Inc. Sacramento FQHC Look-Alike

    Health for All Freeport Clinic Sacramento FQHC Look-Alike

    Health for All Las Palmas Clinic Sacramento FQHC Look-Alike

    Sacramento Community Clinic Del Paso Sacramento FQHC Look-Alike

    Sacramento Community Clinic Southgate Sacramento FQHC Look-Alike

    Barton Memorial Hospital Family Clinic El Dorado Neither

    Shingle Springs Tribal Health Program El Dorado Neither

    Chapa-De Indian Health Program, Inc. Placer Neither

    Planned Parenthood Roseville Placer Neither

    Alternaves Pregnancy Resource Center Sacramento Neither

    The Birthing Project Clinic Sacramento Neither

    Center for Aids Research, Educaon & Services Sacramento Neither

    Feminist Womens Health Center Sacramento Sacramento Neither

    MMC for Children and Families * Sacramento Neither

    Planned Parenthood Capitol Plaza Sacramento Neither

    Planned Parenthood Fruitridge Sacramento Neither

    Planned Parenthood Mar Monte B Street Health Ctr. Sacramento Neither

    Planned Parenthood North Highlands Sacramento Neither

    Rancho Cordova Community Clinic Sacramento Neither

    Sacramento Life Center Sacramento Neither

    Society for the Blind, Inc. Sacramento Neither

    Chapa-De Indian Health Program, Inc. Yolo Neither

    MMC for Children and Families Yolo Neither

    Planned Parenthood Woodland Yolo Neither

    Asian Two or More Races(Non-Lano)

    25.0 10,000

    Immigrant Status U.S. Born 26.5* 341,000 Foreign Born 16.8* 47,000 Federal Poverty Level 0-99 percent FPL 28.8 49,000 100-199 percent FPL 30.4 71,000 200-299 percent FPL 30.7 75,000 >= 300 percent FPL 21.0 193,000Insurance Status Insured 24.4 336,000 Uninsured 26.9 51,000 Total Obese 24.7 388,000

    Delayed/Did Not Get Needed Medical Care, All Ages, Sacramento Region, CHIS 2009

    Source: 2009 California Health Interview Survey

    Populaon Group Percent Pop. EsmateAge Group (Years)

    1-1112-1718-24 11.3 26,00025-39 18.7* 71,00040-64 18.3* 130,00065 or older 4.1* 10,000

    Gender Male 12.2 127,000 Female 12.5 134,000Race/EthnicityWhite 14.0 174,000Lano 9.7 40,000African AmericanAI/ANAsian

    Two or More Races (Non-Lano) Immigrant StatusU.S. Born 12.6 228,000Foreign Born 10.8 33,000Federal Poverty Level0-99 percent FPL 17.6 49,000100-199 percent FPL 14.0 44,000200-299 percent FPL 14.1 47,000

    >= 300 percent FPL 10.2 121,000Insurance Status Insured 11.1* 211,000 Uninsured 23.8* 50,000Total Delayed/Didn't Get Med. Care

    12.4 261,000

    Community Health Centers, 2010

    Source: OSHPD Primary Care Clinic Utilization data les, 2010

    Community Health Centers County FQHC or Look-Alikes

    Received Past Year Mental Health/Alcohol or Other Drug Help, Adults 18 and Older with Need,Sacramento Region, CHIS 2009

    Source: 2009 California Health Interview Survey

    Populaon Group Percent Pop. EsmateAge Group (Years)

    18-24 52.9 22,000

    25-64 59.9 111,000

    65 or older 70.9 7,000

    Gender

    Male 52.5 43,000

    Female 62.5 97,000

    Race/Ethnicity

    White 63.9 103,000

    Lano 28.8 8,000

    African American 84.1 17,000

    AI/AN

    Asian

    Two or More Races (Non-Lano)

    76.7 5,000

    Immigrant Status

    U.S. Born 58.6 145,000

    Foreign Born 46.8 10,000

    Federal Poverty Level

    0-99 percent FPL 55.0 27,000

    100-199 percent FPL 46.4 18,000

    200-299 percent FPL 63.9 27,000

    >= 300 percent FPL 59.8 82,000

    Insurance Status

    Insured 59.0 143,000

    Uninsured 44.9 12,000

    Total Receiving Help 59.1 140,000

    CHC Staffing and Encounters (Visits) per FTE, 2010

    Safety Net No or Underinsured Health Insurance Coverage, 2010

    Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

    Insurance Type Region CaliforniaNo Health Insurance 12.7 percent 18.5 percentMedicare & Medicaid 1.1 percent 1.0 percentMedicaid (ages 18-64) 6.1 percent 5.7 percentMedicaid (ages

  • About the Market Analysis

    Thismarketanalysisisthelargestandmostcomprehensivebench-

    markoftheprimarycaresafetynetintheSacramentoRegionto

    date,assessingbothcurrentandforecasteddemandandcapacity.

    Ratherthanrelyingsolelyondataanalysis,asystemsview

    wastakentounderstandthecurrentandforecastedcapacity

    oftheprimarycaresafetynet.Thefocuswasoncommunity

    healthcenters,healthsystems,healthcareprovidersand

    nonprofitsthatarepartoftheentireenginethatdrivesthe

    SacramentoRegionssafetynet.Conversationswithpeople

    onthefrontlinesofhealthcaredeliveryintheregionand

    low-incomeresidentswerealsoincludedinthisanalysis.

    Thismarketassessmentincorporatesinputfromstakeholder

    interviews,communityhealthcentersitevisits,dataanalysis

    fromavarietyofsources,andfocusgroupinterviewswitha

    cross-sectionofleaders,physiciansandconsumersof

    communityhealthcenterservices.

    Key Findings: 10 Stressors and Strengths Driving Regional Safety Net Performance

    TheSacramentoRegionHealthCarePartnershiphas

    identified10criticalissuesimpactingsafetynetperformance

    andsustainability.Somearechallengestobemitigated,andsome

    arestrengthstobecapitalizedon.Allpresentopportunitiesto

    improveourregionsprimarycareandspecialtycaredelivery

    fortheunderservedpopulationintheSacramentoRegion.

    1. RethinkPrimaryCare.Whilethecurrentsafetynetintheregionhasmanychallenges,theadventofACAallows

    thecommunitytheopportunitytorethinkitsapproachto

    primarycareascurrentlyprovidedbythesafetynet.

    2. GrowingDemand.227,500non-elderlyadultsandchildrenwillbeeligibleforhealthcarecoverageunder

    ACA.Thesafetynetpopulationisgrowingandwill

    continuetogrownaturally.Demandwillacceleratewith

    theadventofACA.

    3. SickerCitizens.Communityhealthindicatorspredictthenewlyinsuredpopulationwillbesickerthanthe

    existingpubliclyinsuredpatientpopulationandhave

    significantlyhigherlevelsofchronicdiseasesandrisk

    factors,suchasasthma,diabetes,highbloodpressure,

    obesity,smokingandpreviouslyunmetneedsforhealth

    Respi te Par tnership Col laborat ive | P a g e 6S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P | P a g e 8

    careand/ormentalhealth/alcoholordrughelp.

    4. MaxedOutCapacity.Theprimarycarecapacityofcommunityhealthcentersandemergencydepartments

    totreatthesafetynetpopulationhasgrown,butwithout

    furthereffortsitwilllikelyreachcapacitypriorto2016.

    5. RegionalCapacityBelowAverage.ThenumberofcommunityhealthcentersintheSacramentoRegion

    hasgrown,butfallssignificantlyshortofmanyother

    similar-sizedregionsinCalifornia.

    6. MoreMedi-CalPayments.Approximately60percentofthenewlyinsuredpatientswillbeinsuredby

    Medi-Cal,makingitthesecondlargestpayersourcein

    theSacramentoRegion.

    7. OveruseofHighCostHospitalandEmergencyDepartmentServices.Currently,thesafetynetisoverlydependentonexpensivehospitals,andemergency

    departments,inparticular,toprovideoutpatientcare.

    8. FinanciallyChallengedCommunityHealthCenters.Roughlyhalfoftheregionscommunityhealthcenters

    arefinanciallychallenged,withexpensesconsistently

    exceedingrevenues.

    9. LimitedFederallyQualifiedHealthCenters.Thenumberandlocationoffederallyqualifiedhealth

    centers(FQHCs)intheregionislowerthanthestate

    averageandotherregions.Manycommunityhealth

    centersarenotabletotakeadvantageoffinancial

    incentivesaffordedtoFQHCs.

    10.LackofCoordinatedLeadership.Thecurrenthealthcaresafetynetlacksaleadagency,coordinationandintegration.

    Next Steps

    Basedonthefindingsinthismarketanalysis,theSacramento

    RegionHealthCarePartnershiphasdevelopedaregional

    sharedvisionandstrategicplantoaddressthemostcritical

    factorsinordertoimprovetheprimarycaresafetynetinthe

    region.Thisplanispresentedinacompanionreport:Preparing

    for Transformation: Rethinking, Revitalizing and Reforming the

    Sacramento Regions Health Care System, a Strategic Plan for

    the Sacramento Region. Thesereportsareavailableonlineat

    www.sierrahealth.org/healthcarepartnership.

  • Project OverviewIdentifying needs and opportunities to optimize the Sacramento Regions safety net system

    Project Objective:

    TofullyunderstandandtransformtheSacramentoRegions

    healthcaresystem(primarycare,specialtycare,acute

    careandhealthplanmanagement)inpreparationforfull

    implementationofhealthreform;ensurecarecapacityand

    residentaccess;andidentifyopportunitiesforvarious

    stakeholderstocontributetothesechanges.

    Market Analysis Background and Context: Building on Previous Research

    In2009,theCaliforniaHealthCareFoundationissueda

    marketreportoftheSacramentoRegion.Akeyfinding

    underscoresalongstandingchallenge:Thesafetynetis

    characterizedbyafragmentedgroupofsmalland

    financiallyfragilehealthcentersthattogetherofferlimited

    outpatientcapacity.3Aseparatereport

    4identifiedthese

    specificchallengesfacingtheSacramentoRegionssafetynet:

    underdevelopedadministrativeandservicedelivery

    capacity,

    limitedaccesstomedicalspecialistsanddentalcare,

    insufficientlinguisticandculturalresources,and

    transportationbarriers.

    Inaddition,overthelastfouryears,manyoftheregions

    countyhealthagencieshaveseentheirgeneralfund

    supportdwindle.AcaseinpointistheSacramentoCounty

    DepartmentofHealthandHumanServices.Consistent

    cutstoSacramentoCountysDepartmentofHealthand

    HumanServicesbeginningin2008haveresultedina50%

    reductioninitstotalbudgetandtheclosureoffiveofits

    sixprimarycareclinics.

    In2010,thefourlocalhealthsystemsDignityHealth

    (CatholicHealthcareWest),KaiserPermanente,Sutter

    HealthSacramentoSierraRegionandtheUniversityof

    CaliforniaDavisHealthSystempartneredwithValley

    Respi te Par tnership Col laborat ive | P a g e 7S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P | P a g e 8 S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P | P a g e 9

    VisiontoconductaCommunityNeedsAssessmentinthe

    GreaterSacramentoRegion.Theassessmenthighlighted

    challengesandneedswithinunderservedpopulationsand

    identifiedkeysourcesforhospitaladmissionsandemergency

    departmentvisits.Zipcodedataprovidedinsightin

    definingtheneedsoftheunderservedpopulation.These

    werethepredominantobstaclesthathinderedorprevented

    accesstohealthcarewithintheunderservedpopulation:5

    affordabilityofhealthcareservices,especially

    healthinsurance,

    locatingphysicians,specialists,dentists,mental/

    behavioralhealthandotherproviderswhoaccept

    Medi-Caland/orworkatreducedrates,

    navigatingacomplexandinefficientsafetynetand

    relatedsocialservicessystem,and

    culturalbarriers,includinglanguageandsocialcustoms.

    Anticipating the Regional Impact of ACA

    ImplementationofthefederalPatientProtectionand

    AffordableCareAct(ACA)in2014representsan

    unprecedentedopportunitytoexpandhealthinsurance

    coveragetothosecurrentlyuninsuredandsupportnewand

    innovativepaymentmodels.TheACAalsobringsrenewed

    attentiontoenrollmentinapatient-centeredmedical

    hometoimproveefficiencyandcoordinationofcare,

    whichwillbestudiedasdemonstrationsbytheCenterfor

    MedicareandMedicaidInnovation,thenewresearchand

    developmentarmoftheCenterforMedicareand

    MedicaidServices6.

    3CaliforniaHealthCareFoundation,SacramentoPowerfulHealthSystemsDominateaStableMarket.http://www.chcf.org/publications/2009/07/sacramento-powerful-hospital-systems-dominate-a-stable-market#ixzz1t5kNz6tN(Lastaccess4-25-12)4July2008report,TowardanImprovedHealthCareSystemforSacramentoCountysUnderservedResidents,authoredbytheSacramentoHealthImprovementProject.5AinsworthD.,DiazH.,SchmidtleinM.2010CommunityNeedsAssessmentFortheGreaterSacramentoRegion.http://www.healthylivingmap.com/CNA%20Report%202010.pdf.6AnalysisofACATitleIISubtitleISec.2303Payment;Sec.2703Stateoptiontoprovidehealthhomesforenrolleeswithchronicconditions;Sec.2706PediatricAccountableCareOrganizationdemonstrationproject;TitleIIISec.3021EstablishmentofCenterforMedicareandMedicaidInnovationwithinCMS;TitleVSec.5301Traininginfamilymedicine,generalinternalmedicine,generalpediatrics,andphysicianassistantship;Sec.5501Expandingaccesstoprimarycareservicesandgeneralsurgeryservices;HealthCareandEducationReconciliationActSec.1202Paymentstoprimarycarephysicians.

  • Respi te Par tnership Col laborat ive | P a g e 6S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P | P a g e 1 0

    Currentestimatesproject227,500non-elderlyadultsand

    childrenintheregionwillbeeligibleforcoveragethrough

    expandedMedi-Calbenefitsorsubsidizedprivateinsurance.

    Hospitalemergencydepartmentscurrentlyplayalargerole

    inthecareofuninsuredandMedi-Calpatients.7Inmost

    instances,thesenewlyeligibleinsuredwillnowbeaccessing

    healthcareservicesfromsafetynetproviders,clinics

    andcommunityhealthcenters.Inordertorealizethe

    opportunityoftheACA,leadersintheregionshealthcare

    communitymustworktogethertoexpandandstabilize

    theprimarycaresafetynet.

    Sierra Health Foundations Role and the Sacramento Region Health Care Partnership

    SierraHealthFoundationhasalonghistoryofpartnership

    andsupportforthehealthcaresafetynetintheSacramento

    Region,withaparticularemphasisontheunderserved.This

    focusareaunderscoresthefoundationsmissiontoinvestin

    andserveasacatalystforideas,partnershipsandprograms

    thatimprovehealthandqualityoflifeinNorthernCalifornia.

    Attherequestofseveralcommunitystakeholders,in2011

    SierraHealthFoundationlaunchedtheSacramentoRegion

    HealthCarePartnership,acoordinatedphilanthropic,

    countyagency,nonprofitproviderandcommunityhealth

    centerefforttostrengthenthehealthcaresafetynetinthe

    four-countySacramentoRegion.Theinitiativegrewout

    ofconversationswithhealthcareleaders,includingpolicy-

    makers,healthsystemsandcommunityhealthcenters,who

    approachedthefoundationtoplayakeyintermediaryrolein

    thebuildingofa21st-centurypatientcareandcoordination

    systemfortheregionsmedicallyunderserved.

    TheSacramentoRegionHealthCarePartnershipsgoalisto

    findwaystoimproveaccess,carecoordinationandqualityof

    theregionsprimarycaresafetynetsystem.TheSacramento

    RegionHealthCarePartnershipbeganbyconducting

    thisupdatedmarketanalysistoobtainabaselineofthe

    currentservicecapacitywithintheprimarycaresafetynet

    andforecastofcliniccapacityneeds.Thefindingsinformed

    thedevelopmentofaregionalstrategicplantodevelopan

    integratedhealthcaredeliverysystemmodelthatefficiently

    linkscommunityhealthcenterstoregionalproviders.

    Theultimatevisionistoincreaseandimproveprimary

    careaccessandqualityforindividualsandfamiliesin

    low-incomecommunitiesandcommunitiesofcolorin

    ElDorado,Placer,SacramentoandYolocounties.

    Partners

    SierraHealthFoundationisdevelopingpartnershipswith

    healthandcivicleadersandbuildingontheseriesof

    HealthCareWorkingGroupconveningsheldin2011by

    CongresswomanDorisMatsui.Initiativepartnersinclude

    abroadrangeofleadersfromcommunityhealthcenters,

    healthsystems,healthplans,community-based

    organizations,associationsandcounties,aswellas

    physicians,policymakersandnonprofitsthatworkwithin

    thesafetynet.SierraHealthFoundation,TheCalifornia

    EndowmentandSacramentoRegionCommunity

    Foundationarefundingpartnersforthismarketanalysis

    andsubsequentstrategicplan.

    Expected Outcomes

    Establishamoresustainableandfinanciallyviable

    primarycaresafetynetsystem.

    Improveadministrativeandservicedeliverycapacityof

    primarycareproviderstoaccommodatethevastincrease

    ofinsuredresidentsundertheAffordableCareAct.

    Facilitatethedevelopmentofanintegratedhealth

    caredeliverysystemmodelthatlinksprimarycareto

    specialtycareandhospitalsystems.

    Expandaccesstohigh-qualityandculturallysensitive

    servicesforresidentsacrosstheSacramentoRegion.

    7JAMA2010;304(6):679-680Katz,Mitchell.FutureoftheSafetyNetUnderHealthReform:http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/304/6/679

  • Respi te Par tnership Col laborat ive | P a g e 7S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P | P a g e 1 0 S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P | P a g e 1 1

    How This Report Was DevelopedA systems approach offers multiple perspectives on safety net performance.

    Theconsultantteamusedacombinationofsourcesand

    qualitativeandquantitativemethodologiestogather

    inputaboutthecurrentandfuturedemandforcareand

    thehealthcaresafetynetscurrentandfuturecapacityto

    provideit.

    Qualitative Input: Stakeholder Site Visits, Surveys and Interviews

    Tocapturea360-degreeviewoftheregionssafetynet,the

    consultantteamdidmorethananalyzedata.Theywentout

    andtalkedtohealthcareprovidersandstakeholderswho

    areonthefrontlinesoftheregionssafetynet.Sitevisits,

    surveys,interviews,discussiongroupsandfocusgroups

    providefeedbackandinsights.

    Theconsultantteaminterviewedcommunityhealthcenter

    leadersandadministeredasurveyonthestateofthesafety

    net.Thesesitevisitsalsoassessedcurrentandanticipated

    capacityneeds.Theteamalsoheldadiscussiongroupwith

    primarycarephysicianspracticinginvariouscaresettings

    throughouttheregion.

    Inaddition,theteamconductedinterviewswiththe

    majorhealthsystems(DignityHealth,KaiserPermanente,

    SutterHealth,UniversityofCaliforniaDavisHealth

    SystemandMarshallMedicalCenter)andwithkeyhealth

    plans(HealthNetofCaliforniaandAnthemBlueCross).

    Foracompletelistofsitevisitsandindividualinterviews,

    visitwww.sierrahealth.org/healthcarepartnership.

    Oncethedatawascollected,theconsultantteammade

    presentationsineachofthefourSacramentoRegion

    countiestogatherinput,feedbackandsuggestionsforthe

    finalmarketanalysisinstruments.

    Theteamalsoconductedthreefocusgroupswithresidents

    whoaresafetynetconsumersofhealthcareservices.See

    www.sierrahealth.org/healthcarepartnershipforbackground

    anddetails.

    Quantitative Data Sources

    Themarketanalysistappedavarietyofdatasources.The

    primarydatasourceusedforhealthcenterandhospital

    demandandcapacitywastheCaliforniaOfficeofStatewide

    PlanningandDevelopment(OSHPD).OSHPDcollects

    dataanddisseminatesinformationaboutCaliforniashealth

    careinfrastructure,promotinganequitablydistributed

    healthcareworkforceandpublishinginformationabout

    healthcareoutcomes.8

    Emergencydepartmentutilizationestimatesofpreventable/

    avoidablevisitsusedtheNewYorkUniversityED

    Algorithm.Moreinformationaboutthedevelopmentand

    methodologyofthisalgorithmcanbefoundattheNYU

    CenterforHealthandPublicServiceResearch.9

    DataforFederallyQualifiedHealthCenters(FQHC)was

    obtainedandmappedusingthefederalUniformData

    Systems(UDS)mappersystem,anonlinedatasourceat

    www.udsmapper.org,toevaluatedatasentfromfederally

    fundedcommunityhealthcenters.Theprojectteamused

    thisdatatocreateregion-levelandcounty-levelmapsand

    otheranalyses.

    Demographic and Population Health Data

    Forhistoricalandcurrentpopulationestimates,thisreport

    usesdatafromtheU.S.CensusBureauandCalifornia

    DepartmentofFinance.SacramentoAreaCouncilof

    Governments(SACOG)populationdatawasusedforthe

    county-levelpopulationprojectionsthrough2016.

    PopulationhealthdatawasobtainedfromtheCalifornia

    HealthInterviewSurvey(CHIS).Thissurveyisconducted

    continuously,releasedbiannually,andcontainssurveydata

    onavarietyofhealthaccess,insurancestatus,health

    outcomeandbehaviorindicators.

    8http://www.oshpd.ca.gov/aboutus9http://wagner.nyu.edu/chpsr/.SeeEDAlgorithm.(lastaccessed4-24-12)

  • Respi te Par tnership Col laborat ive | P a g e 6S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P | P a g e 1 2

    Health Reform Data

    DataonhealthreformwasobtainedfromtheMetro

    ChicagoInformationCenter(MCIC).MCICused2009

    AmericanCommunitySurvey(ACS)datatocalculate

    estimatesofinsurancecoveragestatusandestimatesfrom

    theDepartmentofHomelandSecuritytoadjustforthe

    ACSundercountofnon-citizensandtocalculatethe

    numberofundocumentedresidents.

    Theseestimateswereincorporatedintotheprojection

    modelstoprojectcommunityhealthcenterandemergency

    departmentdemandunderACA.Themarketanalysisalso

    usesprojectionsofuptakeratesofthosecurrently

    uninsuredtoinsured,whichusedzipcode-levelanalysis

    toproducedataspecifictotheSacramentoRegion.

    Projection Methodology

    Projectionsofcommunityhealthcenterandemergency

    departmentdemandweredevelopedusingasimplelinear

    projectionmodel.Themodeluses2006-2010datato

    establishabaselineprojectionfor2012,2014and2016.

    Themodelthenaddsorsubtractsfromthebaselineto

    reflectestimatedimpactofhealthreformchangesonpayer

    mixandutilizationpatterns.

    Theemergencydepartmentprojectionmodelassumes

    thatthegrowthtrendseenintheregionsemergency

    departmentdemandwillcontinueinto2012,2014and

    2016.ThisassumptionisbasedonfindingsofChenet

    al,10whoconcludedthattheMassachusettshealthreform

    of2006didnotimpactemergencydepartmentutilization.

    However,thismaynotbethecaseforhealthreform

    implementationinCalifornia.Somehavearguedthatthe

    declineinemergencydepartmentuseinMassachusettsisa

    resultofbetteraccesstoprimarycare.11Othershaveargued

    thatemergencydepartmentusewillincreaseunderACA

    duetolackofaccessinothersettings.12Ultimately,whether

    emergencydepartmentuseisimpactedisalsoamatterof

    howaccesstoprimarycareisgranted.Thecurrentsystem

    maycauseoverutilizationbydenyingpatientstheabilityto

    selecttheirownhealthhomeorchangingitifdissatisfied,

    whereastheemergencydepartmentmustseethepatient

    wheneverthepatientwants.Thisstudyshowsthechanges

    neededifemergencydepartmentsaretoabsorbdemand

    withnomigrationofcaretoothersettings.

    Transportation Issues Data

    Toexpandonpreviousstudies,SACOGsoughtand

    obtainedaCaltransEnvironmentalJusticePlanningGrant

    toexaminethetransportationneedsoflow-income,

    transit-dependentresidentsoftheSACOGregion,and

    analyzegapsinpublictransitservicetoreachessentialor

    lifelinedestinations.Highlightsoffindingsfromthe

    SACOGstudyaredetailedatwww.sierrahealth.org/

    healthcarepartnership.

    Study Limitations

    ThismarketanalysiswasconductedbetweenNovember

    2011andApril2012usingthelatestdatasourcesavailable.

    Asinmanylargeregionalstudies,publicdatasources(e.g.,

    OSHPD,UDS,etc.)weredeemedthemostuseful.These

    sourcesarereadilyaccessibleandcomparableduetotheir

    defineddatadefinitionsset.However,missingfromthese

    publicreportsarenon-reportingentities,whichinclude

    county-runprimarycarehealthcenters,freeclinicsand

    independentprimarycarephysiciansandotherservice

    deliveryentitiesallofwhichplayimportantrolesin

    meetingthehealthcareneedsoftheregionssafety

    netpopulation.Whileeffortsweremadetoobtain

    quantitativedatafromthesesources,thestudysscope

    didnotallowtheirinclusioninthisreport.Instead,the

    consultantteamcapturedinputfromtheseprovidersvia

    qualitativeresearchmethods.

    10ChenC.,SchefflerG.,ChandraA.MassachusettsHealthCareReformandEmergencyDepartmentUtilization.NewEnglandJournalofMedicine.2011:110907140018030.11SmulowitzP.B.,LiptonR.,WharamJ.F.,etal.EmergencyDepartmentUtilizationAftertheImplementationofMassachusettsHealthReform.AnnalsofEmergencyMedicine.2011;58(3):225234.e1.12GoodmanJ.WhatWillHappenToEmergencyRoomTraffic?HealthAffairsBlog.July12,2010.Availableat:http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2010/07/12/what-will-happen-to-emergency-room-traffic/.AccessedApril23,2012.

    10

    1.5

    2.6

    1

    .7

    2.7

    2.2

    0

    Yolo

    Sacramento

    El Dorado

    Placer

    Yolo

    Sacramento

    El Dorado

    Placer

    112th Congressional Districts

    >45% Percent of Population Living below

    30-45% 200% Federal Poverty Level,

    15-30% American Community Survey

  • Respi te Par tnership Col laborat ive | P a g e 7S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P | P a g e 1 2 S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P | P a g e 1 3

    The Sacramento Regions Safety Net Population Who is served by the Sacramento Regions safety net?

    Theconsultantteambeganitsanalysiswithanoverviewof

    theSacramentoRegionspopulationinElDorado,Placer,

    SacramentoandYolocountiesinNorthernCalifornia.Who

    doestheregionsprimarycaresafetynetservenow?Howare

    residentsaccessingprimarycare?

    TheSacramentoRegionishometoapproximately2.15

    millionresidents.Theareaspopulationhasgrownrapidlyin

    thepastdecade.WhileSacramentoresidentshavehigher

    income,education,privateinsurancecoverageandbetter

    overallhealththanaverageforCalifornia,thereexistwide

    healthdisparitieswithintheregionbyrace,ethnicityand

    income.However,almostone-thirdofSacramentoRegion

    residentshaveincomesbelow200percentoftheFederal

    PovertyLevel(FPL)and15.1percentlivebelow

    100percentoftheFPL.

    Table 1. Sacramento Region Population Estimates

    Table 2. Median Household Income and FPL

    10

    1.5

    2.6

    1

    .7

    2.7

    2.2

    0

    Yolo

    Sacramento

    El Dorado

    Placer

    Yolo

    Sacramento

    El Dorado

    Placer

    112th Congressional Districts

    >45% Percent of Population Living below

    30-45% 200% Federal Poverty Level,

    15-30% American Community Survey

    = 300 percent FPL 5.8 54,000

    Insurance Status

    Insured

    Uninsured

    Total Diagnosed with Diabetes

    7.5 118,000

    Obese (BMI>30), Adults, Sacramento Region, 2009

    Source: 2009 California Health Interview Survey

    Populaon Group Percent Pop. EsmateAge Group (Years)

    High Blood Pressure, Adults, Sacramento Region, 2009

    Source: 2009 California Health Interview Survey

    Populaon Group Percent Pop. Esmate

    Age Group (Years)

    18-24

    25-64 22.1* 241,000

    65 or older 57.6* 140,000

    Gender

    Male 25.5 193,000

    Female 24.7 200,000

    Race/Ethnicity

    White 26.9 265,000

    Lano 22.6 60,000

    African American 37.6 36,000

    AI/AN

    Asian 13.2 21,000

    Two or More Races (Non-Lano)

    24.3 10,000

    Immigrant Status

    U.S. Born 26.3 339,000

    Foreign Born 19.4 54,000

    Federal Poverty Level

    0-99 percent FPL 24.1 41,000

    100-199 percent FPL 28.5 66,000

    200-299 percent FPL 23.5 57,000

    >= 300 percent FPL 24.8 228,000

    Insurance Status

    Insured 26.6* 367,000

    Uninsured 13.9* 27,000

    Total Diagnosed with HBP

    25.1 393,000

    18-24 16.2 38,000 25-64 26.3 287,000 65 or older 25.9 63,000 Gender Male 25.9 196,000 Female 23.6 192,000Race/Ethnicity White 22.5* 221,000 Lano 36.4* 96,000 African American 48.1* 46,000 AI/AN

    El Dorado County Community Health Center El Dorado FQHC

    Placerville Health and Wellness Center El Dorado FQHC

    Birth and Family Health Center Sacramento FQHC

    The Effort Medical Clinic Sacramento FQHC

    The Effort Oak Park Community Health Center Sacramento FQHC

    The Effort South Valley Center Sacramento FQHC

    Sacramento Nave American Health Center, Inc. Sacramento FQHC

    Suer Seniorcare Sacramento FQHC

    Suer Seniorcare Site II Sacramento FQHC

    Davis Community Clinic Yolo FQHC

    Peterson Clinic Yolo FQHC

    Salud Clinic Yolo FQHC

    Winters Healthcare Clinic Yolo FQHC

    Health for All, Inc. Sacramento FQHC Look-Alike

    Health for All Freeport Clinic Sacramento FQHC Look-Alike

    Health for All Las Palmas Clinic Sacramento FQHC Look-Alike

    Sacramento Community Clinic Del Paso Sacramento FQHC Look-Alike

    Sacramento Community Clinic Southgate Sacramento FQHC Look-Alike

    Barton Memorial Hospital Family Clinic El Dorado Neither

    Shingle Springs Tribal Health Program El Dorado Neither

    Chapa-De Indian Health Program, Inc. Placer Neither

    Planned Parenthood Roseville Placer Neither

    Alternaves Pregnancy Resource Center Sacramento Neither

    The Birthing Project Clinic Sacramento Neither

    Center for Aids Research, Educaon & Services Sacramento Neither

    Feminist Womens Health Center Sacramento Sacramento Neither

    MMC for Children and Families * Sacramento Neither

    Planned Parenthood Capitol Plaza Sacramento Neither

    Planned Parenthood Fruitridge Sacramento Neither

    Planned Parenthood Mar Monte B Street Health Ctr. Sacramento Neither

    Planned Parenthood North Highlands Sacramento Neither

    Rancho Cordova Community Clinic Sacramento Neither

    Sacramento Life Center Sacramento Neither

    Society for the Blind, Inc. Sacramento Neither

    Chapa-De Indian Health Program, Inc. Yolo Neither

    MMC for Children and Families Yolo Neither

    Planned Parenthood Woodland Yolo Neither

    Asian Two or More Races(Non-Lano)

    25.0 10,000

    Immigrant Status U.S. Born 26.5* 341,000 Foreign Born 16.8* 47,000 Federal Poverty Level 0-99 percent FPL 28.8 49,000 100-199 percent FPL 30.4 71,000 200-299 percent FPL 30.7 75,000 >= 300 percent FPL 21.0 193,000Insurance Status Insured 24.4 336,000 Uninsured 26.9 51,000 Total Obese 24.7 388,000

    Delayed/Did Not Get Needed Medical Care, All Ages, Sacramento Region, CHIS 2009

    Source: 2009 California Health Interview Survey

    Populaon Group Percent Pop. EsmateAge Group (Years)

    1-1112-1718-24 11.3 26,00025-39 18.7* 71,00040-64 18.3* 130,00065 or older 4.1* 10,000

    Gender Male 12.2 127,000 Female 12.5 134,000Race/EthnicityWhite 14.0 174,000Lano 9.7 40,000African AmericanAI/ANAsian

    Two or More Races (Non-Lano) Immigrant StatusU.S. Born 12.6 228,000Foreign Born 10.8 33,000Federal Poverty Level0-99 percent FPL 17.6 49,000100-199 percent FPL 14.0 44,000200-299 percent FPL 14.1 47,000

    >= 300 percent FPL 10.2 121,000Insurance Status Insured 11.1* 211,000 Uninsured 23.8* 50,000Total Delayed/Didn't Get Med. Care

    12.4 261,000

    Community Health Centers, 2010

    Source: OSHPD Primary Care Clinic Utilization data les, 2010

    Community Health Centers County FQHC or Look-Alikes

    Received Past Year Mental Health/Alcohol or Other Drug Help, Adults 18 and Older with Need,Sacramento Region, CHIS 2009

    Source: 2009 California Health Interview Survey

    Populaon Group Percent Pop. EsmateAge Group (Years)

    18-24 52.9 22,000

    25-64 59.9 111,000

    65 or older 70.9 7,000

    Gender

    Male 52.5 43,000

    Female 62.5 97,000

    Race/Ethnicity

    White 63.9 103,000

    Lano 28.8 8,000

    African American 84.1 17,000

    AI/AN

    Asian

    Two or More Races (Non-Lano)

    76.7 5,000

    Immigrant Status

    U.S. Born 58.6 145,000

    Foreign Born 46.8 10,000

    Federal Poverty Level

    0-99 percent FPL 55.0 27,000

    100-199 percent FPL 46.4 18,000

    200-299 percent FPL 63.9 27,000

    >= 300 percent FPL 59.8 82,000

    Insurance Status

    Insured 59.0 143,000

    Uninsured 44.9 12,000

    Total Receiving Help 59.1 140,000

    CHC Staffing and Encounters (Visits) per FTE, 2010

    Safety Net No or Underinsured Health Insurance Coverage, 2010

    Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

    Insurance Type Region CaliforniaNo Health Insurance 12.7 percent 18.5 percentMedicare & Medicaid 1.1 percent 1.0 percentMedicaid (ages 18-64) 6.1 percent 5.7 percentMedicaid (ages = 300 percent FPL 5.8 54,000

    Insurance Status

    Insured

    Uninsured

    Total Diagnosed with Diabetes

    7.5 118,000

    Obese (BMI>30), Adults, Sacramento Region, 2009

    Source: 2009 California Health Interview Survey

    Populaon Group Percent Pop. EsmateAge Group (Years)

    High Blood Pressure, Adults, Sacramento Region, 2009

    Source: 2009 California Health Interview Survey

    Populaon Group Percent Pop. Esmate

    Age Group (Years)

    18-24

    25-64 22.1* 241,000

    65 or older 57.6* 140,000

    Gender

    Male 25.5 193,000

    Female 24.7 200,000

    Race/Ethnicity

    White 26.9 265,000

    Lano 22.6 60,000

    African American 37.6 36,000

    AI/AN

    Asian 13.2 21,000

    Two or More Races (Non-Lano)

    24.3 10,000

    Immigrant Status

    U.S. Born 26.3 339,000

    Foreign Born 19.4 54,000

    Federal Poverty Level

    0-99 percent FPL 24.1 41,000

    100-199 percent FPL 28.5 66,000

    200-299 percent FPL 23.5 57,000

    >= 300 percent FPL 24.8 228,000

    Insurance Status

    Insured 26.6* 367,000

    Uninsured 13.9* 27,000

    Total Diagnosed with HBP

    25.1 393,000

    18-24 16.2 38,000 25-64 26.3 287,000 65 or older 25.9 63,000 Gender Male 25.9 196,000 Female 23.6 192,000Race/Ethnicity White 22.5* 221,000 Lano 36.4* 96,000 African American 48.1* 46,000 AI/AN

    El Dorado County Community Health Center El Dorado FQHC

    Placerville Health and Wellness Center El Dorado FQHC

    Birth and Family Health Center Sacramento FQHC

    The Effort Medical Clinic Sacramento FQHC

    The Effort Oak Park Community Health Center Sacramento FQHC

    The Effort South Valley Center Sacramento FQHC

    Sacramento Nave American Health Center, Inc. Sacramento FQHC

    Suer Seniorcare Sacramento FQHC

    Suer Seniorcare Site II Sacramento FQHC

    Davis Community Clinic Yolo FQHC

    Peterson Clinic Yolo FQHC

    Salud Clinic Yolo FQHC

    Winters Healthcare Clinic Yolo FQHC

    Health for All, Inc. Sacramento FQHC Look-Alike

    Health for All Freeport Clinic Sacramento FQHC Look-Alike

    Health for All Las Palmas Clinic Sacramento FQHC Look-Alike

    Sacramento Community Clinic Del Paso Sacramento FQHC Look-Alike

    Sacramento Community Clinic Southgate Sacramento FQHC Look-Alike

    Barton Memorial Hospital Family Clinic El Dorado Neither

    Shingle Springs Tribal Health Program El Dorado Neither

    Chapa-De Indian Health Program, Inc. Placer Neither

    Planned Parenthood Roseville Placer Neither

    Alternaves Pregnancy Resource Center Sacramento Neither

    The Birthing Project Clinic Sacramento Neither

    Center for Aids Research, Educaon & Services Sacramento Neither

    Feminist Womens Health Center Sacramento Sacramento Neither

    MMC for Children and Families * Sacramento Neither

    Planned Parenthood Capitol Plaza Sacramento Neither

    Planned Parenthood Fruitridge Sacramento Neither

    Planned Parenthood Mar Monte B Street Health Ctr. Sacramento Neither

    Planned Parenthood North Highlands Sacramento Neither

    Rancho Cordova Community Clinic Sacramento Neither

    Sacramento Life Center Sacramento Neither

    Society for the Blind, Inc. Sacramento Neither

    Chapa-De Indian Health Program, Inc. Yolo Neither

    MMC for Children and Families Yolo Neither

    Planned Parenthood Woodland Yolo Neither

    Asian Two or More Races(Non-Lano)

    25.0 10,000

    Immigrant Status U.S. Born 26.5* 341,000 Foreign Born 16.8* 47,000 Federal Poverty Level 0-99 percent FPL 28.8 49,000 100-199 percent FPL 30.4 71,000 200-299 percent FPL 30.7 75,000 >= 300 percent FPL 21.0 193,000Insurance Status Insured 24.4 336,000 Uninsured 26.9 51,000 Total Obese 24.7 388,000

    Delayed/Did Not Get Needed Medical Care, All Ages, Sacramento Region, CHIS 2009

    Source: 2009 California Health Interview Survey

    Populaon Group Percent Pop. EsmateAge Group (Years)

    1-1112-1718-24 11.3 26,00025-39 18.7* 71,00040-64 18.3* 130,00065 or older 4.1* 10,000

    Gender Male 12.2 127,000 Female 12.5 134,000Race/EthnicityWhite 14.0 174,000Lano 9.7 40,000African AmericanAI/ANAsian

    Two or More Races (Non-Lano) Immigrant StatusU.S. Born 12.6 228,000Foreign Born 10.8 33,000Federal Poverty Level0-99 percent FPL 17.6 49,000100-199 percent FPL 14.0 44,000200-299 percent FPL 14.1 47,000

    >= 300 percent FPL 10.2 121,000Insurance Status Insured 11.1* 211,000 Uninsured 23.8* 50,000Total Delayed/Didn't Get Med. Care

    12.4 261,000

    Community Health Centers, 2010

    Source: OSHPD Primary Care Clinic Utilization data les, 2010

    Community Health Centers County FQHC or Look-Alikes

    Received Past Year Mental Health/Alcohol or Other Drug Help, Adults 18 and Older with Need,Sacramento Region, CHIS 2009

    Source: 2009 California Health Interview Survey

    Populaon Group Percent Pop. EsmateAge Group (Years)

    18-24 52.9 22,000

    25-64 59.9 111,000

    65 or older 70.9 7,000

    Gender

    Male 52.5 43,000

    Female 62.5 97,000

    Race/Ethnicity

    White 63.9 103,000

    Lano 28.8 8,000

    African American 84.1 17,000

    AI/AN

    Asian

    Two or More Races (Non-Lano)

    76.7 5,000

    Immigrant Status

    U.S. Born 58.6 145,000

    Foreign Born 46.8 10,000

    Federal Poverty Level

    0-99 percent FPL 55.0 27,000

    100-199 percent FPL 46.4 18,000

    200-299 percent FPL 63.9 27,000

    >= 300 percent FPL 59.8 82,000

    Insurance Status

    Insured 59.0 143,000

    Uninsured 44.9 12,000

    Total Receiving Help 59.1 140,000

    CHC Staffing and Encounters (Visits) per FTE, 2010

    Safety Net No or Underinsured Health Insurance Coverage, 2010

    Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

    Insurance Type Region CaliforniaNo Health Insurance 12.7 percent 18.5 percentMedicare & Medicaid 1.1 percent 1.0 percentMedicaid (ages 18-64) 6.1 percent 5.7 percentMedicaid (ages

  • Respi te Par tnership Col laborat ive | P a g e 6S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P | P a g e 1 4

    One out of three people living under 138 percent FPL are currently uninsured in the Sacramento Region,

    but will be eligible for Medi-Cal under ACA

    Figure 1. Trends in Adults Living in Poverty

    Health Outcome Rankings

    Whenlookingattheregionshealthintermsofoverall

    longevityandqualityoflife,Placer,YoloandElDorado

    countiesrankinthetopquartileofallCaliforniacounties,

    whileSacramentoCountyissignificantlylesshealthy,

    rankinginthethirdquartile.

    Maps 1 and 2. County Health Outcomes Rankings

    Community Health Indicators

    Communityhealthindicatorspredicthealthcareusage.

    TheindicatorswerederivedusingtheCaliforniaHealth

    InterviewSurvey(CHIS),thelargeststatepopulation-based

    surveyinthenation.

    FromtheCHISdata,thesecommunityhealthindicators

    wereselected: Asthma HeartDisease Diabetes HighBloodPressure(HBP) Obesity Overweight

    Sacramento Placer Yolo

    2009 52,998 12,494 24,607 13,874

    2014 130,034 21,015 38,193 24,341

    +145%

    +68%

    +55%+75%

    0

    20,000

    40,000

    60,000

    80,000

    100,000

    120,000

    140,000

    Movement in Individual Insurance, 2009 - 2014

    Source: MCIC Chicago, 2012

    El Dorado

    Movement in Uninsured, 2009 - 2014

    Source: MCIC Chicago, 2012

    Sacramento Placer YoloEl Dorado

    Movement in Medi-Cal, 2009 - 2014

    Source: MCIC Chicago, 2012

    Sacramento

    San Diego County

    Alameda County

    California

    Santa Clara County

    Sacramento region

    Contra Costa/Solano Counties

    Orange County

    Placer YoloEl Dorado

    Sacramento RegionAverage

    California Average

    Placer YoloEl Dorado

    2009 289,312 16,286 31,303 32,156

    2014 379,533 23,375 42,453 41,643

    +31%

    +44% +36% +30%

    0

    50,000

    100,000

    150,000

    200,000

    250,000

    20.0%

    % Pov

    erty

    Visits

    ED visits

    per 1,000

    pop

    ulation

    Perce

    nt Admitted

    Total F

    TE

    Visits

    per FTE

    18.0%

    16.0%

    14.0%

    12.0%

    10.0%

    8.0%

    6.0%

    4.0%

    2.0%

    0%2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

    Yolo County

    18.3%

    15.7%

    10.0%8.8%

    300,000

    350,000

    400,000

    2009 222,518 19,579 33,149 28,060

    2014 55,261 3,969 8,413 8,106

    -75%

    -80% -75% -71%0

    50,000

    100,000

    150,000

    200,000

    250,000

    Sacramento Region Estimates of Age & Gender, 2009

    Source: 2009 California Health Interview Survey

    Percentage of Adults 18-64 Living Below the Federal Poverty Level (100% FPL)*, 2006-2010

    * For reference, the 2010 FPL was an annual income of $10,830 or less for an individual

    Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2006-2010 ACS 1-year estimates

    Note: e FPL for eligibility for ACA is 133% but there is an income disregard of 5%that could raise the level to 138%

    El Dorado County Sacramento CountyPlacer County

    Sacramento Region

    California

    170,000

    97,000

    676,000

    136,000

    180,000

    97,000

    650,000

    107,000

    0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000

    Children (0-11)

    Adolescents (12-17)

    Adults (18-64)

    Seniors (65+)

    Estimated Number

    MalesFemales

    CHC Visits per 1,000 Population, 2010

    Source: OSHPD Primary Care Clinic Utilization Data Files, 2010; 2010 U.S. Census

    Source: OSHPD Emergency Department Visits: Frequencies by County & EMS utilization trends, 2006-2010, CA Department of Finance, Dec 2011

    Note: ED utilization rates do not include ED visits that resulted in hospital admission.

    Sacramento Region Community Health Indicators, CHIS 2009

    Source: 2009 California Health Interview Survey

    Got Needed MH/AOD Services is based on a smaller sample - it is asked onlyof those who said they needed MH/AOD services - 15.2% of the regional population

    60%

    50%

    40%

    30%

    20%

    10%

    0%

    Sacramento Region Estimates of Age & Race, 2009

    Source: 2009 California Health Interview Survey

    Source: California Health Interview Survey, 2001-2009

    0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000

    Children +Adolescents (0-17)

    Adults (18-64)

    Seniors (65+)

    Estimated Number

    CHC Visits, 2006 to 2010

    0

    50,000

    100,000

    150,000

    200,000

    250,000

    300,000

    Medi-Cal

    Sliding Scale,Self-Pay & Free

    Indigent

    All Other

    Medicare

    Private

    350,000

    400,000

    450,000

    500,000

    145,000

    240,000

    24,000

    260,000

    806,000

    179,000

    53,000

    79,000

    17,000

    51,000

    146,000

    16,000

    Asian (non-Lano)African American (non-Lano)White (non-Lano)Lano

    16.213.7

    6.5 5.97.5 8.5

    25.126.2

    33.7

    59.155.5

    33.6

    24.722.7

    14.413.6 12.415.1

    Asthma-All Ages

    Heart Disease - Adults

    Diabetes - Adults

    HBP - Adults

    Overweight (BMI 25-29.9) - Adults

    Obese (BMI > or = to 30) - Adults

    Current Smoker - Adults

    Delayed/Didnt Get Care - All Ages

    Got Needed M

    H/AOD Services - Adults

    Sacramento Region State of California

    30.0%

    25.0%

    20.0%

    15.0%

    10.0%

    5.0%

    0.0%

    2001 2003 2005 2007 2009

    14.7% 16.2%17.4% 18.5%

    16.2%

    Asthma Rate, Ages 1 Year and Older, Sacramento Region, CHIS 2001-2009

    300

    250

    200

    150

    100

    50

    0

    2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

    235216

    216

    170 170186

    197220

    232 238

    265 269

    269266

    ED Utilization Rates per 1,000 population

    Source: California Health Interview Survey, 2001-2009

    30.0%

    35.0%

    25.0%

    20.0%

    15.0%

    10.0%

    2001 2003 2005 2007 2009

    23.4%21.9%

    25.8%

    28.8%

    25.1%

    High Blood Pressure Rate, Adults 18 and Older, Sacramento Region, CHIS 2001-2009

    Source: California Health Interview Survey, 2001-2009

    20.0%

    25.0%

    15.0%

    10.0%

    40.0%

    45.0%

    50.0%

    35.0%

    30.0%

    5.0%

    0.0%

    2001 2003 2005 2007 2009

    20.4% 19.5%20.8%

    24.3% 24.7%

    Obese (BMI> or = to 30) Rate, Adults 18 and Older, Sacramento Region, CHIS 2009

    209

    211

    220

    222

    411

    567

    616

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

    Alameda County

    San Diego County

    California

    Contra Costa/Solano Counties

    Santa Clara County

    Orange County

    Sacramento region

    CHCs per 100,000 Population, 2010

    Source: OSHPD Primary Care Clinic Utilization Data Files, 2010; 2010 U.S. Census

    ED Discharges

    CHC Visits

    Source: OSHPD Primary Care Clinic Annual Utilization Data Files & Emergency Department Visits: Frequencies by County & EMS utilization trends, 2006-2010

    Source: OSHPD Primary Care Clinic Utilization Data Files, 2006-2010

    Source: OSHPD Primary Care Clinic Utilization Data Files, 2006-2010

    Note: All Other includes breast cancer, Child Health and Disability Prevention Program, Expanded Access to Primary Care, and Family PACT encounters. Indigent includes County CDSP and Healthy Families

    300

    250

    200

    150

    100

    50

    0

    2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

    2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

    ED Discharges and CHC Visits per 1,000 Population, 2006-2010

    Visits per FTE

    Total FTE

    Source: OSHPD Primary Care Clinic Utilization Data Files, 2006-2010

    250

    200

    150

    100

    50

    0

    3,000

    2,500

    2,000

    1,500

    1,000

    500

    3,000

    3,500

    4,000

    2,500

    2,000

    1,500

    1,000

    500

    800

    900

    1,000

    700

    600

    500

    400

    300

    200

    100

    02006 2007 2008 2009 2010

    CHC Visits per FTE, 2006-2010

    2010

    2009

    2008

    2007

    2006

    0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

    Percentage of CHC Encounters by Payer Source, 2006 to 2010

    330,312 323,200

    372,867421,135

    472,662

    ED Discharges and Admissions, 2006-2010

    0

    100,000

    200,000

    300,000

    400,000

    500,000

    600,000

    700,000

    800,000

    4.0%

    2.0%

    0.0%

    6.0%

    8.0%

    10.0%

    12.0%

    14.0%

    16.0%

    18.0%

    Source: OSHPD Hospital Annual Utilization Database, 2006-2010

    2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

    ED Discharges, 2006-2010

    0

    100,000

    200,000

    300,000

    400,000

    500,000

    600,000

    700,000

    Source: OSHPD Emergency Department Encounters, County Frequencies by PatientCounty of Residence 2006-2010

    2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

    Medi-Cal

    Sliding Scale,Self-Pay & Free

    Indigent

    Other

    Medicare

    Private

    2016

    2014

    2012

    2010

    0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

    County Projected CHC Payer Mix, 2012 to 2016

    % Patient Revenue

    % Non-patient Revenue

    % Federal

    % State

    % County/Local

    % Private Donations & Grants

    % Other Revenues

    Medi-Cal

    Self-Pay

    Private

    Medicare

    Other Non-Federal

    Other

    2010

    2009

    2008

    2007

    2006

    0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

    Percentage of ED Discharges by Payer Source, 2006-2010

    445,919484,584 504,083

    565,568 580,184

    Source: OSHPD Emergency Department Encounters, County Frequencies by PatientCounty of Residence 2006-2010

    Percent AdmittedTotal AdmittedTotal Discharged

    Clinical Encounters per CHC FTE, 2010

    Source: OSHPD Primary Care Clinic Utilization Data Files

    Note: Clinical encounters includes visits to physicians, nurse family practitioners, physicians assistants, and midwives

    Percentage of ED Discharges Classified as ED Care Not Needed

    AllDischarges

    Self-Pay Medi-Cal Commercial Medicare

    Emergent/Primary Care TreatableNon-emergent

    40.4%41.9%

    46.1%

    37.5% 36.3%

    50%

    45%

    40%

    35%

    25%

    15%

    5%

    30%

    20%

    10%

    0%

    Total Number of ED Discharges Classified as ED Care Not Needed

    Self-Pay Medi-Cal Commercial Medicare

    Emergent/Primary Care TreatableNon-emergent

    90,000

    80,000

    70,000

    60,000

    40,000

    20,000

    0

    50,000

    30,000

    10,000

    41,245

    75,36679,452

    37,560

    Additional FTEs Needed to Meet State and Regional Benchmarks, 2014, 2016

    2014 2016

    180

    160

    140

    Addl FTEs = regional avg

    Addl FTEs = state avg

    Current FTEs

    120

    80

    40

    0

    100

    60

    20

    1.72

    1.73

    1.80

    1.91

    2.75

    3.39

    4.50

    0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

    CHCs

    Alameda County

    San Diego County

    California

    Contra Costa/Solano Counties

    Santa Clara County

    Orange County

    Sacramento region

    CaliforniaSacramento regionEl Dorado

    FQHCs and FQHC Look-Alikes per 100,000 Population, 2010

    Source: OSHPD Primary Care Clinic Utilization Data Files, 2010; 2010 U.S. Census

    0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

    FQHCs

    FQHC Look-Alikes

    0.60

    0.47

    0.73

    0.75

    1.39

    2.33

    2.32

    0.23

    0.03

    0.28

    0.00

    0.17

    0.13

    0.07

    ED Visits

    /Statio

    n

    ED Statio

    ns

    ED Stations

    ED Visits/Station

    Source: OSHPD Annual Utilization Data Files, 2006-2010

    2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

    2010 2012 2014 2016

    Emergency Department Capacity, 2006-2010

    Sacramento RegionAverage

    California Average

    Placer YoloEl Dorado

    3,000

    3,500

    4,000

    2,500

    2,000

    1,500

    1,000

    500

    2,000

    2,250

    2,500

    1,750

    1,500

    1,250

    1,000

    750

    500

    250

    0

    Mental Health Encounters per CHC FTE, 2010

    Source: OSHPD Primary Care Clinic Utilization Data Files, 2010

    Note: Mental health encounters includes visits to psychiatrists and clinical psychologists

    Proj Visits/FTE

    5,000

    6,000

    4,000

    3,000

    2,000

    1,000

    Projected CHC Visits per FTE, 2010-2016

    Source: OSHPD Primary Care Clinic Utilization Data Files, 2010; MCIC Chicago;e Abaris Group 2012

    Source: OSHPD Primary Care Clinic Utilization Data Files, 2010; MCIC Chicago;e Abaris Group 2012

    Note: Additional FTEs represent additional beyond 2010 levels reported to OSHPDby the 37 licensed primary care clinic CHCs in the region.

    CA 5-year avg Clinics with Loss

    Clinics with Positive MarginsSac region 5-year avg

    Sacramento RegionAverage

    California Average

    Placer YoloEl Dorado

    3,000

    3,500

    4,000

    2,500

    2,000

    1,500

    1,000

    500

    Dental Encounters per CHC FTE, 2010

    Source: OSHPD Primary Care Clinic Utilization Data Files, 2010

    Note: Dental encounters includes visits to dentists and dental hygienists

    SacramentoSacramentoRegion

    Geographic Area

    Rate per 100

    ,000

    PlacerCalifornia YoloEl Dorado

    Primary Care Physician Categories per 100,000 Population by License Location

    Source: California Healthcare Foundation, Fewer & More Specialized: An Assessment ofPhysician Supply in California, 2009. Data from California Medical Board Physician License Renewal Survery, 2008.

    30.0

    35.0

    25.0

    20.0

    15.0

    10.0

    5.0

    0.0

    Family MedicineGeneral PracticeInternal MedicineGeriatricsPediatricsOB/GYN

    Rate per 100

    ,000

    Specialty

    Selected Specialty Care Physician Categories per 100,000 Population by Licenses Location

    Source: California Healthcare Foundation, Fewer & More Specialized: An Assessment ofPhysician Supply in California, 2009. Data from California Medical Board Physician License Renewal Survery, 2008.

    10.0

    12.0

    8.0

    6.0

    4.0

    2.0

    0.0

    PlacerSacramentoYolo

    Card

    iolog

    y

    Derm

    atolo

    gy

    Endo

    crino

    logy

    Gastr

    oent

    erolo

    gy

    Neph

    rolog

    y

    Onco

    logy

    Neur

    ology

    Opht

    halm

    ology

    Psyc

    hiatry

    Pulm

    onolo

    gy

    1,5811,679

    1,5761,671 1,657

    352 354399 422

    444

    3,700

    3,900

    4,100

    3,500

    3,300

    3,100

    Occ

    upan

    cy Rate

    Bed

    s

    Staffed Beds

    Staffed Bed Occupancy Rate

    Source: OSHPD Hospital Annual Financial Data, 2006-2010

    2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

    Hospital Staffed Bed Occupancy Rates, 2006-2010

    80%

    90%

    100%

    70%

    60%

    50%

    40%

    30%

    20%

    10%

    0

    76.6% 75.3% 74.5% 74.1% 72.2%

    3,4573,522 3,553

    3,600 3,631

    Average Revenues/Encounter

    Average Expenses/Encounter

    2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

    Average Expenses and Revenues Per Encounter, 2006-2010

    $200

    $150

    $100

    $50

    $0

    Projected CHC Visits, 2012-2016

    0

    100,000

    200,000

    300,000

    400,000

    500,000

    600,000

    700,000

    800,000

    Source: OSHPD Primary Care Clinic Utilization Data Files, 2006-2010; MCIC Chicago;e Abaris Group 2012

    Source: OSHPD Primary Care Clinic Utilization Data Files, 2006-2010; MCIC Chicago;e Abaris Group 2012

    2010 2012 2014 2016

    2010 ReferenceLinear IncreaseChange due to ACA

    725,227

    690,143

    472,662

    Medi-Cal

    Self-Pay

    Private

    Medicare

    Other

    Other non-Federal

    2016

    2014

    2012

    2010

    0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

    Projected ED Payer Mix, 2012 to 2016

    Projected ED Discharges, 2012-2016

    0

    100,000

    200,000

    300,000

    400,000

    500,000

    600,000

    700,000

    800,000

    900,000

    1,000,000

    Note: e ED discharge projections includes residents of the Sacramento region discharged from an ED (does not include ED admissions).

    Source: OSHPD ED Encounters, Frequencies by Patient County of Residence, 2006-2010; MCIC Chicago; e Abaris Group 2012

    Source: OSHPD ED Encounters, Frequencies by Patient County of Residence, 2006-2010; MCIC Chicago; e Abaris Group 2012

    2010 2012 2014 2016

    Linear trendLinear+5%Linear+10% 2010 Reference

    835,463795,679

    580,184

    875,247

    CHC Total Net Revenues, 2010

    Source: OSHPD Primary Care Clinic Utilization Data Files, 2010

    110.2

    110.213.1

    28.115.7

    17.6

    800

    900

    1,000

    700

    600

    500

    400

    300

    200

    100

    0

    ED Visits

    /Statio

    n

    ED Statio

    ns

    Rev

    enue

    Sou

    rce

    ED Stations

    ED Visits/Station

    Source: OSHPD Annual Utilization Data Files, 2006-2010

    Note: Projections made using simple linear regression.

    2010 2012 2014 2016

    Emergency Department Capacity - No Stations Added, 2012-2016

    National Benchmark

    2,000

    2,250

    2,500

    1,750

    1,500

    1,250

    1,000

    750

    500

    250

    0

    800

    900

    1,000

    700

    600

    500

    400

    300

    200

    100

    0

    ED Visits

    /Statio

    n

    Perce

    ntag

    e of Diabetes

    Amon

    g Adults

    ED Statio

    ns

    ED Stations

    ED Visits/Station

    Source: OSHPD Annual Utilization Data Files, 2006-2010

    Note: 1,550 patients per treatment station is a national benchmark for full ED capacity

    2010 2012 2014 2016

    Emergency Department Capacity - With Stations Added, 2012-2016

    2,000

    2,250

    2,500

    1,750

    1,500

    1,250

    1,000

    750

    500

    250

    0

    1,657 1,657 1,657 1,657

    444

    502559

    615

    Source: OSHPD Primary Care Clinic Utilization Data Files, 2010

    CHC Revenue Sources, 2010

    70.3%

    14.1%

    1.3%4.9%

    7.0%

    2.3%

    29.7%

    - $20,333,464

    $10,401,134

    $25,000,000

    $20,000,000

    $15,000,000

    $10,000,000

    $5,000,000

    $0

    $5,000,000

    $10,000,000

    $15,000,000

    N=16

    Total Net Revenues = $(9,932,000)

    Total N

    et Rev

    enue

    Net Revenues

    N=20

    Clinics with Negative Margins

    Clinics with Positive Margins

    CHC Total Net Revenues, 2006-2010

    Source: OSHPD Primary Care Clinic Utilization Data Files, 2006-2010

    2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Total CHC Margin -3.4% 0.0% -2.9% -0.9% -4.8%No. of clinics sites w/ + Margins 18 19 19 23 18No. of clinics sites w/ - Margins 13 8 13 10 19

    $3,598,061

    $3,044,701

    $4,034,838

    $6,549,394

    $4,404,139

    $5,840,320

    $3,046,152

    $6,150,357

    $7,267,579

    $9,130,472

    2006

    2007

    2008

    2009

    2010

    Percent of Total Revenues

    Clinics with Negative Margins

    Clinics with Positive Margins

    Percent of CHC Total Revenues by Revenue Source, 2010

    Source: OSHPD Primary Care Clinic Utilization Data Files, 2006-2010 Source: OSHPD Primary Care Clinic Utilization Data Files, 2006-2010

    Notes: Sutter Senior Care not included. Barton Memorial Hospital Family Clinic did not report any nancial data in 2007.

    Federal

    Patient Revenues

    State

    County/Local

    Donations & Grants

    Other

    0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

    $152$149

    $164 $161

    $175

    $155

    $146

    $167 $165

    $185

    2003 2005 2007 2009

    Diabetes, Adults 18 and Older, Sacramento Region, 2003-2009

    25.0%

    20.0%

    15.0%

    10.0%

    5.0%

    0.0%

    Source: California Health Interview Survey, 2001-2009. No data for 2001.

    7.3%5.7%

    6.5%7.5%

    444 444 444 444

    1,657

    1,874

    2,085

    2,297

    10

    1.5

    2.6

    1

    .7

    2.7

    2.2

    0

    Yolo

    Sacramento

    El Dorado

    Placer

    Yolo

    Sacramento

    El Dorado

    Placer

    112th Congressional Districts

    >45% Percent of Population Living below

    30-45% 200% Federal Poverty Level,

    15-30% American Community Survey

  • Respi te Par tnership Col laborat ive | P a g e 7S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P | P a g e 1 4 S A C R A M E N T O R E G I O N H E A L T H C A R E P A R T N E R S H I P | P a g e 1 5

    Theregionssafetynetpopulationforthemostpartmirrors

    Californiasintermsofillnessesthatpredicthealthcare

    utilizationrates.Regionally,12.4percentofthepopulation,

    oroneineveryeightresidents,islikelytodelaygettingcare,

    butthemajorityofresidents(59.1percent)areableto

    accessspecialtybehavioralhealthservices.Acrossthe

    adultpopulation,the