STAFFORD COUNTY PUBLIC STAFFORD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOLS

ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

2009 UPDATE2009 UPDATE

Bob Randall CEM, ,BEP, CBCPBob Randall CEM, ,BEP, CBCP Energy ManagerEnergy Manager

Overview Overview

• 2009 Energy Reduction Efforts 2009 Energy Reduction Efforts

• Energy Performance Contract Energy Performance Contract UpdateUpdate

• New & Future Energy New & Future Energy Reductions EffortsReductions Efforts

Energy Reduction EffortsEnergy Reduction Efforts20092009

• 4th Consecutive Year – 4th Consecutive Year – School Division Reduced School Division Reduced Utility Consumption…….Utility Consumption…….

while the average cost while the average cost of electricity increased of electricity increased 3% from $.089 to an 3% from $.089 to an average cost of $.091 average cost of $.091 per KWH for all usageper KWH for all usage

Energy Reduction EffortsEnergy Reduction Efforts20092009

• How Did We Do It?How Did We Do It?

– Energy Performance ContractEnergy Performance Contract

– Temperature Control Temperature Control ReductionsReductions

– Retro-CommissioningRetro-Commissioning

Energy Reduction EffortsEnergy Reduction Efforts20092009

• Savings Savings

Elementary Schools = 25,090,400 MBTU’SElementary Schools = 25,090,400 MBTU’S Middle Schools = 9,630,304 MBTU’SMiddle Schools = 9,630,304 MBTU’S High Schools = High Schools = 25,372,208 MBTU’S25,372,208 MBTU’S TOTAL = 60,092,912 MBTU’STOTAL = 60,092,912 MBTU’S

– This is equivalent to enough energy to operate four This is equivalent to enough energy to operate four Elementary, two new and one old Middle School and our Elementary, two new and one old Middle School and our New High School New High School FREEFREE

Savings (60,092,912) MBTU’S = $ 1,602,712Savings (60,092,912) MBTU’S = $ 1,602,712Energy Performance Contract = Energy Performance Contract = $- 394,896$- 394,896

Savings from Behavior Modifications Savings from Behavior Modifications and and Temperature Control Measures $ 1,207,816Temperature Control Measures $ 1,207,816

Energy Savings Per Sq. FootEnergy Savings

Per Sq. Foot

$2.04$1.91

$1.79

$1.64

$1.47

$1.00

$1.20

$1.40

$1.60

$1.80

$2.00

$2.20

Calendar Year

Dollars Per

Sq. Foot

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Energy Reduction EffortsEnergy Reduction Efforts20092009

Energy Reduction EffortsEnergy Reduction Efforts20092009

• Environmental ImpactEnvironmental Impact

– 148,165 TONS of 148,165 TONS of Carbon Dioxide Carbon Dioxide (CO2) (CO2) NOTNOT EMMITTED INTO EMMITTED INTO THE ATMOSPHERE.THE ATMOSPHERE.

– THIS IS THE THIS IS THE RIGHT THING TO RIGHT THING TO DO!DO!

Energy PerformanceEnergy Performance Contract Contract

• HistoryHistory

– Recognized opportunity to reduce energy Recognized opportunity to reduce energy consumption by modernization of facility building consumption by modernization of facility building systems through Energy Conservation Measures systems through Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs)(ECMs)

• LightingLighting• Occupancy SensorsOccupancy Sensors• Motors & Fan DrivesMotors & Fan Drives• Water ConservationWater Conservation

– Utilized State Energy Performance Contract Program Utilized State Energy Performance Contract Program to evaluate, interview and select an energy to evaluate, interview and select an energy performance contractorperformance contractor

– Contracts are funded through annual energy savingsContracts are funded through annual energy savings

Energy PerformanceEnergy Performance Contract Contract

• HistoryHistory

– Selected NORESCO for Phase ISelected NORESCO for Phase I• 20062006• 18 Schools18 Schools• 7 Energy Conservation Measures7 Energy Conservation Measures• Completed April 2007Completed April 2007

– Selected NORESCO for Phase IISelected NORESCO for Phase II• January 2010January 2010• 10 Schools10 Schools• 4 Energy Conservation Measures4 Energy Conservation Measures• Estimated Completion April 2011Estimated Completion April 2011

Energy PerformanceEnergy PerformanceContractContract

• Phase II - UpdatePhase II - Update

– In June 2010 NORESCO initiated Detailed Energy AuditIn June 2010 NORESCO initiated Detailed Energy Audit

• Survey 10 school division facilities - Conway ES, Margaret Survey 10 school division facilities - Conway ES, Margaret Brent ES, Hampton Oaks ES, Hartwood ES, Winding Creek Brent ES, Hampton Oaks ES, Hartwood ES, Winding Creek ES, Drew MS, AG Wright MS, Brook Point HS, Mountain View ES, Drew MS, AG Wright MS, Brook Point HS, Mountain View HS, and the Professional Development CenterHS, and the Professional Development Center

– Four (4) energy conservation measures (ECM’s) Four (4) energy conservation measures (ECM’s) – Audit Completion - July 30, 2010Audit Completion - July 30, 2010– Estimate Approval process Complete by September 2010Estimate Approval process Complete by September 2010– Estimate Start Work - November 2010Estimate Start Work - November 2010– Estimate Complete Work April 2011Estimate Complete Work April 2011

Energy PerformanceEnergy PerformanceContract Contract

• Energy Conservation Measures SelectedEnergy Conservation Measures Selected

– ECM #1 - Efficient Lighting ECM #1 - Efficient Lighting – ECM #2 - Occupancy Sensors in classrooms, ECM #2 - Occupancy Sensors in classrooms,

hallways, offices, gyms)hallways, offices, gyms)– ECM #3 - Water Conservation (low flush)ECM #3 - Water Conservation (low flush)– ECM #4 - Variable Fan Drives & Efficient Motors for ECM #4 - Variable Fan Drives & Efficient Motors for

HVAC EquipmentHVAC Equipment

• Estimated Annual Energy Cost Savings = Estimated Annual Energy Cost Savings = $199,500.00 per year Guaranteed$199,500.00 per year Guaranteed

New & Future Energy New & Future Energy Reduction Efforts Reduction Efforts

• Implement School Division Energy Implement School Division Energy Management PlanManagement Plan

– Approved June 2010Approved June 2010

– Road Map to Comprehensive Energy ManagementRoad Map to Comprehensive Energy Management

– GoalsGoals• Utilize Performance Contracting Efforts where applicableUtilize Performance Contracting Efforts where applicable• Establish Operational Guidelines for temperature settingsEstablish Operational Guidelines for temperature settings• Establish Operational Guidelines for hours of operationEstablish Operational Guidelines for hours of operation

– ComponentsComponents• EducationEducation• Waste Reduction & Operational GuidelinesWaste Reduction & Operational Guidelines• Retro-CommissioningRetro-Commissioning• Monitoring & ReportingMonitoring & Reporting• Sustainable Practices for Staff and StudentsSustainable Practices for Staff and Students

New & Future EnergyNew & Future Energy Reduction Efforts Reduction Efforts

• Retro-Commissioning EffortsRetro-Commissioning Efforts– Retro-Commission at least one school per yearRetro-Commission at least one school per year

• Complete BPHS in FY11Complete BPHS in FY11• DMS and PRES in FY12DMS and PRES in FY12

• Continue Holiday, Spring & Summer Break Continue Holiday, Spring & Summer Break Temperature Control MeasuresTemperature Control Measures

• Complete Energy Performance Contract Complete Energy Performance Contract (Phase II)(Phase II)

• Plan Energy Performance Contract (Phase III) Plan Energy Performance Contract (Phase III) Identified in FY11-16 CIPIdentified in FY11-16 CIP

• Establish School Division Energy Steering Establish School Division Energy Steering CommitteeCommittee

New & Future EnergyNew & Future EnergyReduction Efforts Reduction Efforts

• Energy Star RatingEnergy Star Rating– EPA Program helping facility owners protect the EPA Program helping facility owners protect the

environment through superior energy efficiency environment through superior energy efficiency – All New Additions, Renovations and New All New Additions, Renovations and New

Construction will be designed to achieve a Construction will be designed to achieve a minimum energy star rating of 75 (out of 100)minimum energy star rating of 75 (out of 100)

– All existing facilities will be surveyed and be scoredAll existing facilities will be surveyed and be scored• Ratings will drive further energy enhancement to Ratings will drive further energy enhancement to

physical plantphysical plant

• Extend Natural Gas Line to Mountain View HS Extend Natural Gas Line to Mountain View HS & Margret Brent ES – FY11& Margret Brent ES – FY11

New & Future EnergyNew & Future EnergyReduction Efforts Reduction Efforts

• Explore Use of Energy EducationExplore Use of Energy Education– Private Consulting FirmPrivate Consulting Firm– Long Term Effort to Identify Long Term Effort to Identify

Unnecessary and/or Excessive Utility Unnecessary and/or Excessive Utility ConsumptionConsumption

– Guarantees 20%+ Annual SavingsGuarantees 20%+ Annual Savings– Cost Paid for from SavingsCost Paid for from Savings

• Classroom EducationClassroom Education– In coordination with Instruction In coordination with Instruction

Department Enhance Energy Department Enhance Energy Education OpportunitiesEducation Opportunities

Questions?Questions?