Staff Performance Evaluation ResultsSY 2018-2019

Prepared by the Office of InnovationRebecca Estes, Director of Leadership & Innovation

Reporting Requirements: IC 20-28-11.5-9LEA:

• All traditional public school corporations and charter schools;

• Ratings for all certificated employees, including teachers, principals, superintendents, and other school/corporation personnel;

IDOE:

• Statewide, corporation, and school aggregates;

• Rating by Educator preparation program institutions reported for first, second-, and third-year teachers;

• Retention rate;

SY 2018-2019 Reporting TotalsReporting Entities:

• Charters: 2,972

• Corporations: 69,253

• Sped Co-Op: 583

• University School: 55

• Vocational Ed Co-Op: 54

• Grand Total: 72,917

Certificated Employee Breakdown:

• School-Level Administrators: 11,813

• Central-Office Administrators: 2,980

• Teachers: 58,124

Total Distribution

• Distribution includesall certificated employees

SY 2018-2019

Not Rated8% Ineffective

0%

Needs Improvement1%

Effective41%

Highly Effective50%

SY 2018-2019 Not Rated

• Majority of LEA’s didnot report the reasonthe certificated staff member was not rated

SY 2018-2019

Deceased0% FMLA

0%

Long Term Substitute1%

N/A92%

No longer with Corp/Charter

4%

Other2%

Retired1%

Teachers 2018-2019

• Includes all non-administrators to total 58,124

• 7 percent not rated

Teachers SY 2018-2019

Not Rated7%

Ineffective0%

Needs Improvement1%

Effective44%

Highly Effective48%

Building-LevelAdministrators

• Includes assistants and other school-based administrators to total 11,813

• 10 percent not rated

Building-Level Administrators SY 2018-2019

Not Rated10% Ineffective

0%

Needs Improvement1%

Effective33%Highly Effective

56%

Central OfficeSY 2018-2019• Includes central office

personnel to total 2,980

• 18 percent not rated

Central Office SY 2018-2019

Not Rated18%

Ineffective0%

Needs Improvement

0%

Effective25%

Highly Effective57%

School Types: All certificated employees

Charters SY 2018-2019 Corportations SY 2018-2019

Not Rated7%

Ineffective0%

Needs Improvement

1%

Effective41%

Highly Effective51%

Not Rated24%

Ineffective1%

Needs Improvement

7%

Effective44%

Highly Effective24%