PRESENTED BY: ZUMRA NAWAZ CHEEMA

*

*

Uri Attack (Brief Introduction)

Aftermath

Indian Reaction

Pakistan’s Response

U.S and China Stance

Conclusion

*

* Since 8 July 2016, the Indian state of Jammu &

Kashmir has been undergoing continuous

unrest following the killing of a freedom

campaigner Burhan Wani. The killing sparked

violent protests against the Indian government

in the valley. Following the protest, Curfew was

imposed in all 10 districts of the valley on 15

July and mobile services were suspended by

the government. Protesters defied curfew with

attacks on security forces and public properties.

*During the protests, over 100 civilians have been

killed,and thousands have been injured, including

several Indian security personnel. Following such

situation of unrest, The most recent incident is on

India’s Uri army base on September 18, left 18

soldiers dead and 19-30 soldiers were reported to

have been injured in the attack.

*

*On 19 September, soon after the attack Indian

officials of the Home and Defence ministries met to

review the security situation in Kashmir, particularly

in areas along the Line of Control (LOC).

*Pakistan International Airlines cancelled flights to

certain parts of Kashmir on 21 September

*Security around the army installation in Uri was

intensified following the attack, while soldiers on both

the Indian and Pakistani side of LOC were placed on

high alert.

*India cancelled its participation in the 19th

SAARC summit to be held in November

in Islamabad, Pakistan. Later, Afghanistan,

Bangladesh, and Bhutan also withdrew from the

summit. On 30 September 2016, Pakistan

stated that the summit scheduled for November

9 and 10 in Islamabad would be held on an

alternative date.

*

*After the attack, India started to blame Pakistan as it

is customary to do during past various incidents.

India made false allegations to divert international

attention away from the brutality being perpetrated

by India against innocent masses of occupied

Jammu and Kashmir. A multi-level debate has started

inside India about waging total war or a limited strike

against Pakistan.

* India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi accused

Pakistan of being an exporter of terrorism, and

vowing to mount a global campaign to isolate it.

*Rajnath Singh, the Indian home minister

described the attack as a cross border infiltration by

militants trained and equipped by Pakistan and thus

labelled Pakistan yet again “a terrorist state.”

*on 26 September, the Indian government stated it

would exercise its rights under the 1960 Indus

Waters Treaty to the full and would expand its

utilisation of its rivers flowing through Jammu and

Kashmir

*The government subsequently stated it would review

Pakistan's most-favored-nation (MFN) trade status,

which India had granted in 1996

*On September 29, eleven days after the attack, the

Indian army said it conducted "surgical strikes"

against suspected militants in Pakistan-administered

Kashmir

*

*Pakistani authorities responded by asking for

“actionable evidence” and rejecting as “baseless”

Indian allegations that they had aided the attackers

*Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has said in

the United Nation General Assembly address that the

Uri terror attack could be the result of a "reaction" of

the people to the situation in Kashmir as he criticised

India for blaming Pakistan "without any evidence".

*Pakistan's envoy in New Delhi, Abdul Basit, told

India's Foreign Secretary S. Jaishankar that

India sought to divert world attention from state

atrocities in Kashmir by blaming the attack on

Pakistan

*Maliha Lodhi, the permanent representative of

Pakistan in UN, fiercely replied to Indian false

claims. She stated that India is adopting all

these bogus measures to justify its brutal acts

in Kashmir.

*Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff Raheel Sharif

claimed that India is propagating a "hostile

narrative" in response the attack and also stated

that the Pakistani armed forces are "prepared to

respond to the entire spectrum of direct and

indirect threat

*In response to India's suspension of

cooperation over the Indus Waters Treaty, Sartaj

Aziz said India could not revoke the treaty

unilaterally as per the International World Bank

provisions and international laws, and said such

a move would be taken as an act of "war and

hostilities." Aziz said Pakistan would approach

the United Nations Security Council in that

event

*On India withdrawing from the scheduled

SAARC summit in Islamabad, Pakistan's

Foreign Office termed the withdrawal

"unfortunate" and posted a rejoinder stating: "

*

*China has declined reports of Beijing backing

Pakistan over Kashmir issue. Chinese foreign

ministry spokesperson Geng Shuang

told China's position on the Kashmir issue is

consistent and clear,"

"As the neighbour and friend to both Pakistan and

India, we hope the two countries will properly

address their differences through dialogue and

consultation, manage and control the situation

and jointly work for the peace and stability of

South Asia and the growth of the region.

*

*On September 21, US Secretary of State John Kerry

asked Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to

support India in all possible ways in the investigation

of the Uri attack. The US also snubbed Pakistan’s

‘Kashmir’ rant. Kerry met Sharif and asked him to

prevent terrorists from using the Pakistani territory as

safe haven.

*On September 28, Kerry asked India’s External

Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj not to escalate the

matters with Pakistan. US State Department deputy

spokesperson Mark Toner said: “‘We continue to put

pressure on Pakistan to respond to those groups

who are seeking safe haven on Pakistan’s borders.”

*

It is evident from various past internal security issues

in India that it always adopted offensive stance in

blaming Pakistan without having any substantial proof.

In contrast, Pakistan remained unable to address

India's false blame at international level. At this time

Pakistani political and military elite took somewhat

quick and unitary response towards India's

Propaganda. Or else like every other time India would

have won the battle of narratives.