standard dredge & fill application - new hampshire · standard dredge & fill application ....

New Hampshire

Department of Transportation

US Route 3/NH Route 25

Improvement Project

Meredith

10430

STP-F-X-0241(014)

January 2017

Standard Dredge & Fill Application

2

Contents

Wetland Permit Application form ................................................................................................................................. 3

Location Maps ............................................................................................................................................................... 8

Attachment A – 20 Questions ...................................................................................................................................... 11

Minutes – NHDOT Natural Resource Agency Coordination Meeting .......................................................................... 20

Mitigation Correspondence ......................................................................................................................................... 24

NHB DataCheck Results Letter ..................................................................................................................................... 26

NH Fish & Game Correspondence ............................................................................................................................... 29

USFWS Official Species List .......................................................................................................................................... 32

No Historic Properties Affected Memo ....................................................................................................................... 39

Army Corps Appendix B ............................................................................................................................................... 42

Photographs ................................................................................................................................................................ 45

Construction Sequence ................................................................................................................................................ 52

Wetland Impact Plans & Erosion Control Plans ........................................................................................................... 54

3

WETLAND PERMIT APPLICATION FORM

[email protected] or (603) 271-2147 NHDES Wetlands Bureau, 29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95, Concord, NH 03302-0095

www.des.nh.gov Permit Application - Valid until 01/2018 Page 1 of 4

NHDES-W-06-012

WETLANDS PERMIT APPLICATION Land Resources Management

Wetlands Bureau Check the status of your application: www.des.nh.gov/onestop

RSA/Rule: RSA 482-A/ Env-Wt 100-900

1. REVIEW TIME:

Indicate your Review Time below. Refer to Guidance Document A for instructions.

Standard Review (Minimum, Minor or Major Impact) Expedited Review (Minimum Impact only)

2. PROJECT LOCATION:

Separate applications must be filed with each municipality that jurisdictional impacts will occur in.

ADDRESS: US Route 3/NH Route 25 TOWN/CITY: Meredith

TAX MAP: n/a BLOCK: n/a LOT: n/a UNIT: n/a

USGS TOPO MAP WATERBODY NAME: Lake Winnipesaukee NA STREAM WATERSHED SIZE: 0.15 sq mi NA

LOCATION COORDINATES (If known): -71.4999 43.6582 Latitude/Longitude UTM State Plane

3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

Provide a brief description of the project outlining the scope of work. Attach additional sheets as needed to provide a detailed explanation of your project. DO NOT reply “See Attached" in the space provided below.

The project is located on US Route 3 and NH Route 25 in Meredith Village. The overall project consists of operational modifications to enhance existing infrastructure, including minor improvements in lane configuration and signals. Work in jurisdictional areas involves sliplining twin 36” concrete culverts that carry an intermittent stream under US 3 near Lake Street. The culverts outlet into Lake Winnipesaukee.

4. SHORELINE FRONTAGE

NA This lot has no shoreline frontage. SHORELINE FRONTAGE: 1,700'

Shoreline frontage is calculated by determining the average of the distances of the actual natural navigable shoreline frontage and a straight line drawn between the property lines, both of which are measured at the normal high water line.

5. RELATED PERMITS, ENFORCEMENT, EMERGENCY AUTHORIZATION, SHORELAND, ALTERATION OF TERRAIN, ETC.

Shoreland PBN

6. NATURAL HERITAGE BUREAU & DESIGNATED RIVERS:

See the Instructions & Required Attachments document for instructions to complete a & b below.

a. Natural Heritage Bureau File ID: NHB 17 ___ - 0841 __ .

b. Designated River the project is in ¼ miles of: ; and

date a copy of the application was sent to the Local River Management Advisory Committee: Month: Day: Year:

NA

Administrative

Use Only

Administrative

Use Only

Administrative

Use Only

File No.:

Check No.:

Amount:

Initials:

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.des.nh.gov/

http://www.des.nh.gov/onestop

http://nhdes.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=d3869f998e614d81925481ac71c3903e

http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/rivers/lac/documents/lac_contacts.pdf



7. APPLICANT INFORMATION (Desired permit holder)

LAST NAME, FIRST NAME, M.I.: Lyford, Don

TRUST / COMPANY NAME:NHDOT Highway Design MAILING ADDRESS: 7 Hazen Drive

TOWN/CITY: Concord STATE: NH ZIP CODE: 03302

EMAIL or FAX: PHONE: 271-2171

ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION: By initialing here: , I hereby authorize NHDES to communicate all matters relative to this application electronically

8. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION (If different than applicant)

LAST NAME, FIRST NAME, M.I.:

TRUST / COMPANY NAME:NH Department of Transportation MAILING ADDRESS: 7 Hazen Drive


EMAIL or FAX: [email protected] PHONE: 271-3226

ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION: By initialing here mru , I hereby authorize NHDES to communicate all matters relative to this application electronically

9. AUTHORIZED AGENT INFORMATION

LAST NAME, FIRST NAME, M.I.: Perron, Christine COMPANY NAME:McFarland Johnson

MAILING ADDRESS: 53 Regional Drive


EMAIL or FAX: [email protected] PHONE: 225-2978

ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION: By initialing here cjp , I hereby authorize NHDES to communicate all matters relative to this application electronically

10. PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE:

See the Instructions & Required Attachments document for clarification of the below statements

By signing the application, I am certifying that:

1. I authorize the applicant and/or agent indicated on this form to act in my behalf in the processing of this application, and to furnish upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.

2. I have reviewed and submitted information & attachments outlined in the Instructions and Required Attachment document.

3. All abutters have been identified in accordance with RSA 482-A:3, I and Env-Wt 100-900.

4. I have read and provided the required information outlined in Env-Wt 302.04 for the applicable project type.

5. I have read and understand Env-Wt 302.03 and have chosen the least impacting alternative.

6. Any structure that I am proposing to repair/replace was either previously permitted by the Wetlands Bureau or would be considered grandfathered per Env-Wt 101.47.

7. I have submitted a Request for Project Review (RPR) Form (www.nh.gov/nhdhr/review) to the NH State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) at the NH Division of Historical Resources to identify the presence of historical/ archeological resources while coordinating with the lead federal agency for NHPA 106 compliance.

8. I authorize NHDES and the municipal conservation commission to inspect the site of the proposed project.

9. I have reviewed the information being submitted and that to the best of my knowledge the information is true and accurate.

10. I understand that the willful submission of falsified or misrepresented information to the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services is a criminal act, which may result in legal action.

11. I am aware that the work I am proposing may require additional state, local or federal permits which I am responsible for obtaining.

12. The mailing addresses I have provided are up to date and appropriate for receipt of NHDES correspondence. NHDES will not forward returned mail.

Property Owner Signature

Print name legibly

/ / Date



http://www.nh.gov/nhdhr/review



MUNICIPAL SIGNATURES

11. CONSERVATION COMMISSION SIGNATURE

The signature below certifies that the municipal conservation commission has reviewed this application, and:

1. Waives its right to intervene per RSA 482-A:11; 2. Believes that the application and submitted plans accurately represent the proposed project; and 3. Has no objection to permitting the proposed work.

Authorized Commission Signature

Print name legibly Date

DIRECTIONS FOR CONSERVATION COMMISSION

1. Expedited review ONLY requires that the conservation commission’s signature is obtained in the space above.

2. Expedited review requires the Conservation Commission signature be obtained prior to the submittal of the original application to the Town/City Clerk for signature.

3. The Conservation Commission may refuse to sign. If the Conservation Commission does not sign this statement for any reason, the application is not eligible for expedited review and the application will reviewed in the standard review time frame.

12. TOWN / CITY CLERK SIGNATURE

As required by Chapter 482-A:3 (amended 2014), I hereby certify that the applicant has filed four application forms, four detailed plans, and four USGS location maps with the town/city indicated below.

Town/City Clerk Signature

Print name legibly Town/City Date

DIRECTIONS FOR TOWN/CITY CLERK:

Per RSA 482-A:3,I

1. For applications where "Expedited Review" is checked on page 1, if the Conservation Commission signature is not present, NHDES will accept the permit application, but it will NOT receive the expedited review time.

2. IMMEDIATELY sign the original application form and four copies in the signature space provided above;

3. Return the signed original application form and attachments to the applicant so that the applicant may submit the application form and attachments to NHDES by mail or hand delivery.

4. IMMEDIATELY distribute a copy of the application with one complete set of attachments to each of the following bodies: the municipal Conservation Commission, the local governing body (Board of Selectmen or Town/City Council), and the Planning Board; and

5. Retain one copy of the application form and one complete set of attachments and make them reasonably accessible for public review.

DIRECTIONS FOR APPLICANT:

1. Submit the single, original permit application form bearing the signature of the Town/ City Clerk, additional materials, and the application fee to NHDES by mail or hand delivery.





13. IMPACT AREA:

For each jurisdictional area that will be/has been impacted, provide square feet and, if applicable, linear feet of impact

Permanent: impacts that will remain after the project is complete.

Temporary: impacts not intended to remain (and will be restored to pre-construction conditions) after the project is complete.

After-the-fact (ATF): work completed prior to receipt of this application by DES. Check box to indicate ATF. JURISDICTIONAL AREA PERMANENT

Sq. Ft. / Lin. Ft. TEMPORARY

Sq. Ft. / Lin. Ft.

Forested wetland ATF ATF

Scrub-shrub wetland ATF ATF

Emergent wetland ATF ATF

Wet meadow ATF ATF

Intermittent stream 132 / 20 ATF 49 / 7 ATF

Perennial Stream / River / ATF / ATF

Lake / Pond / ATF 88 / 5 ATF

Bank - Intermittent stream 228 / 38 ATF 66 / 12 ATF

Bank - Perennial stream / River / ATF / ATF

Bank - Lake / Pond / ATF / ATF

Tidal water / ATF / ATF

Salt marsh ATF ATF

Sand dune ATF ATF

Prime wetland ATF ATF

Prime wetland buffer ATF ATF

Undeveloped Tidal Buffer Zone (TBZ) ATF ATF

Previously-developed upland in TBZ ATF ATF

Docking - Lake / Pond ATF ATF

Docking - River ATF ATF

Docking - Tidal Water ATF ATF

TOTAL 360 / 58 203 / 24

14. APPLICATION FEE: See the Instructions & Required Attachments document for further instruction

Minimum Impact Fee: Flat fee of $ 200

Minor or Major Impact Fee: Calculate using the below table below

Permanent and Temporary (non-docking) 563 sq. ft. X $0.20 = $ 112.60

Temporary (seasonal) docking structure: sq. ft. X $1.00 = $

Permanent docking structure: sq. ft. X $2.00 = $

Projects proposing shoreline structures (including docks) add $200 = $

Total = $ 112.60

The Application Fee is the above calculated Total or $200, whichever is greater = $ 200



8

LOCATION MAPS

NH Department of TransportationMeredith, 10430

LOCATION MAPDecember 2016 1

Meredith Bay

Lake impacts

Stream impacts

0.15 sq mi

´

SCALE : DATE : FIGURE :

1 inch = 2,000 feet

Approximate Project Limits

Watershed Boundary of Intermittent Stream

NH Department of TransportationMeredith, 10430

Aerial ViewDecember 2016 3

Lake St

Dover St

Main

St

Pleasant St

Lake WinnipesaukeeMeredith Bay

Main

St

?¬

?¬Ij

Ij

Unna

med S

tream

Twin 36" Culverts

´

SCALE : DATE : FIGURE :

1 inch = 250 feet

Approximate Project Limits

250' Protected Shoreland

cperron

Text Box

2

11

ATTACHMENT A – 20 QUESTIONS


www.des.nh.gov

Wetlands Permit Application Attachment A – Revised 01/2017 Page 1 of 8

NHDES-W-06-013

WETLANDS PERMIT APPLICATION – ATTACHMENT A MINOR AND MAJOR - 20 QUESTIONS

Land Resources Management Wetlands Bureau

Check the Status of your application: www.des.nh.gov/onestop

RSA/ Rule: RSA 482-A, Env-Wt 100-900

Env-Wt 302.04 Requirements for Application Evaluation - For any major or minor project, the applicant shall demonstrate by plan and example that the following factors have been considered in the project’s design in assessing the impact of the proposed project to areas and environments under the department’s jurisdiction. Respond with statements demonstrating:

1. The need for the proposed impact.

The existing twin 36" culverts that will be sliplined as part of this project are in poor condition with a history of sink holes developing in the roadway above them. The headwall will be reconstructed. Addressing these culverts is necessary in order to maintain the safety and integrity of the roadway.

2. That the alternative proposed by the applicant is the one with the least impact to wetlands or surface waters on site.

The only alternative that would have less impact to surface waters would be the no-build alternative, which would not address the deteriorating condition of the pipes and would lead to their eventual failure. Full replacement of these pipes was presented as the proposed alternative at the November 16, 2016 NHDOT Natural Resource Agency Coordination Meeting. Since that meeting, it was determined that lining the pipes with a thermoplastic Close Fit Liner would adequately address the deteriorating joints of the concrete pipe sections, extend the life span of the pipes, and eliminate impacts outside existing right-of-way.



http://www.des.nh.gov/onestop


www.des.nh.gov


3. The type and classification of the wetlands involved.

R4SB3J (Riverine, Intermittent, Streambed, Cobble-Gravel, Intermittently Flooded)

L2US3G (Lacustrine, Littoral, Unconsolidated Shore, Mud, Intermittently Exposed)

4. The relationship of the proposed wetlands to be impacted relative to nearby wetlands and surface waters.

The intermittent stream originates south of the project area and flows into Lake Winnipesaukee. The lake covers an area of approximately 70 square miles.

5. The rarity of the wetland, surface water, sand dunes, or tidal buffer zone area.

There are no unusual features, rare species, or exemplary natural communities within the project area. The intermittent stream type is common throughout the State and the small area of lake bed that will be disturbed by the culvert replacement work is within a developed area of the shoreline.

6. The surface area of the wetlands that will be impacted.

Permanent impacts to the channel of an intermittent stream: 132 sq ft

Permanent imapcts to the banks of an intermittent stream: 228 sq ft

Temporary impacts to the stream and lakebed: 203 sq ft




www.des.nh.gov


7. The impact on plants, fish and wildlife including, but not limited to:

a. Rare, special concern species;

b. State and federally listed threatened and endangered species;

c. Species at the extremities of their ranges;

d. Migratory fish and wildlife;

e. Exemplary natural communities identified by the DRED-NHB; and

f. Vernal pools.

The NH Natural Heritage Bureau has no records of sensitive species or natural communities of concern in the vicinity of the project. The USFWS Information, Planning, and Conservation System (IPaC) web tool was utilized to determine if federally listed species have the potential to occur in the project area. According to IPaC, the federally-threatened small whorled pogonia and northern long-eared bat are potential concerns in this region of New Hampshire. The project is located in a developed area with no forested habitat; therefore there is no suitable habitat within the project area for either of these species.

No vernal pools were identified in the project area.

The twin culverts carrying an intermittent stream are not perched and currently allow aquatic organism passage. The culverts are 135’ in length and at a slope of only 1%. The lining will not result in a perched condition. NH Fish and Game reviewed the proposed sliplining and had no concerns. Stream flow will be diverted through one culvert at a time during construction, which will minimize termporary impacts to the stream during construction.

8. The impact of the proposed project on public commerce, navigation and recreation.

The project will have no impact on public commerce or navigation. The culvert outlets are not located in an area of the lake that is used for recreation or navigation.

9. The extent to which a project interferes with the aesthetic interests of the general public. For example, where an applicant proposes the construction of a retaining wall on the bank of a lake, the applicant shall be required to indicate the type of material to be used and the effect of the construction of the wall on the view of other users of the lake.

The proposed culvert work will not impact the aesthetics of Meredith Village. The culvert outlets are visible from the boardwalk that extends from the Town Docks; however, the pipes are located along a developed, disturbed section of shoreline and the proposed work will not change the existing aesthetics in this area.




www.des.nh.gov


10. The extent to which a project interferes with or obstructs public rights of passage or access. For example, where the applicant proposes to construct a dock in a narrow channel, the applicant shall be required to document the extent to which the dock would block or interfere with the passage through this area.

Public rights of passage or access will not be obstructed following construction of this project.

11. The impact upon abutting owners pursuant to RSA 482-A:11, II. For example, if an applicant is proposing to rip-rap a stream, the applicant shall be required to document the effect of such work on upstream and downstream abutting properties.

Riprap will be placed at the inlet of the twin 36" culverts to stabilize the area of channel and banks that will be disturbed during construction. The area of riprap will be minimal, and impacts to the lake and stream from proposed culvert work will be minimal. The project will not impact abutters.

12. The benefit of a project to the health, safety, and well being of the general public.

The project will protect the safety and integrity of US Route 3/NH Route 25, which will benefit the safety and well-being of motorists.




www.des.nh.gov


13. The impact of a proposed project on quantity or quality of surface and groundwater. For example, where an applicant proposes to fill wetlands the applicant shall be required to document the impact of the proposed fill on the amount of drainage entering the site versus the amount of drainage exiting the site and the difference in the quality of water entering and exiting the site.

The project will not impact the quality or quantity of surface and groundwater. Runoff from the project area is not currently treated in any formalized treatment areas and is discharged directly into Lake Winnipesaukee. There are a number of environmental and engineering constraints and challenges associated with providing stormwater treatment in the project area. The project area is fully developed and the Town of Meredith has requested that any proposed work minimize impacts to businesses and utilities. The open space that does exist in the vicinity of the project consists of recreational sites that are protected under Section 4(f) and Section 6(f). Given these constraints, the only BMP that is feasible is deep sump catch basins, which will be provided where catch basins will be replaced within the project area.

The project will not change the existing roadway alignment, profile, or width. The overall area of impervious surface will be redcued by approximately 1,100 sq ft.

To protect water quality, all appropriate erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented during construction and all disturbed surfaces will be stabilized upon the completion of construction.

14. The potential of a proposed project to cause or increase flooding, erosion, or sedimentation.

The slip lining methodology that is proposed is called a Close Fit Liner (CFL) and will only reduce the diameter of the culverts a nominal amount. The CFL has a relatively thin wall and can fit immediately adjacent to the inside of the existing culvert. The liners are made from thermoplastic and have a lower Manning’s coefficient than the existing concrete pipe. The slight loss in hydraulic capacity due to the reduction in pipe diameter is offset by the increase in capacity due to the smoother surface. Therefore, hydraulic capacity will not be diminished. The culverts have no history of flooding and the completed project is not expected to cause or increase flooding, erosion, sedimentation. To prevent erosion and sedimentation, all appropriate erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented during construction, and all disturbed surfaces will be stabilized upon the completion of construction.




www.des.nh.gov


15. The extent to which a project that is located in surface waters reflects or redirects current or wave energy which might cause damage or hazards.

The project will maintain the existing stream alignment and will not change the shoreline of the lake; therefore, the project will not reflect or redirect currents.

16. The cumulative impact that would result if all parties owning or abutting a portion of the affected wetland or wetland complex were also permitted alterations to the wetland proportional to the extent of their property rights. For example, an applicant who owns only a portion of a wetland shall document the applicant’s percentage of ownership of that wetland and the percentage of that ownership that would be impacted.

All future proposed impacts would need to comply with applicable state and federal regulations.




www.des.nh.gov


17. The impact of the proposed project on the values and functions of the total wetland or wetland complex.

The project will not impact the overall functions and values of the lake or intermittent stream.




www.des.nh.gov


18. The impact upon the value of the sites included in the latest published edition of the National Register of Natural Landmarks, or sites eligible for such publication.

No such areas exist in the vicinity of the project.

19. The impact upon the value of areas named in acts of Congress or presidential proclamations as national rivers, national wilderness areas, national lakeshores, and such areas as may be established under federal, state, or municipal laws for similar and related purposes such as estuarine and marine sanctuaries.

No such areas exist in the vicinity of the project.

20. The degree to which a project redirects water from one watershed to another.

Water will not be redirected to a different watershed.




www.des.nh.gov


Additional comments



20

MINUTES – NHDOT NATURAL RESOURCE AGENCY COORDINATION MEETING

BUREAU OF ENVIRONMENT CONFERENCE REPORT

SUBJECT: NHDOT Monthly Natural Resource Agency Coordination Meeting DATE OF CONFERENCE: November 16, 2016

LOCATION OF CONFERENCE: John O. Morton Building ATTENDED BY:

NHDOT Matt Urban Sarah Large Ron Crickard Mark Hemmerlein Marc Laurin Jon Evans Rebecca Martin Anthony Weatherbee Don Lyford Leah Savage Jon Hebert Jim Kirouac Ali Skinner Kathy Corliss Tim Mallette Josh Lafond Chris Carucci Carol Niewola

Stephanie Micucci Bill Saffian Colleen White Kirk Mudgett Wendy Johnson Dave Smith Army Corps of Engineers

Rick Kristoff

NHDES Gino Infascelli Lori Sommer NH Fish & Game Carol Henderson John Magee

NH Natural Heritage

Bureau

Amy Lamb Consultants/Public

Participants

Christine Perron Brian Patinskas Josh Lund Jed Merrow Steve Hoffmann Dave Kull Don Kretchmer Ryan Lizewski Bill Arcieri John Gorham Marv Everson Martha Drukker

(When viewing these minutes online, click on an attendee to send an e-mail) PRESENTATIONS/ PROJECTS REVIEWED THIS MONTH:

(minutes on subsequent pages) Finalization of September 21st and October 19th 2016 Meeting Minutes........................................... 2

Littleton 41224, Non-Federal ............................................................................................................. 2

Kingston 41222, (Non-Federal) .......................................................................................................... 3

Swanzey 41223, (Non-Federal) .......................................................................................................... 3

Barnstead 16020, (Non-Federal) ........................................................................................................ 4

Meredith 10430, (Non-Federal) .......................................................................................................... 6

Ossipee 10431, (Non-Federal) ............................................................................................................ 7

Bethlehem 26763, (X-A004(296)) ..................................................................................................... 9

Roxbury-Sullivan 10439 (F-X-0121(034)) ...................................................................................... 10

Concord 28417, (X-A003(741)) ....................................................................................................... 11

Laconia Apt. TW E ext. (SBG-09-13-201) ...................................................................................... 14

Nashua-Merrimack-Bedford 13761 (IM-0931(201)) ....................................................................... 16 (When viewing these minutes online, click on a project to zoom to the minutes for that project

mailto:[email protected]?subject=NHDOT%20Natural%20Resource%20Agency%20Coordination%20Meeting



November 16th Natural Resource Agency Coordination Meeting

Page 6

L. Sommer asked if there are any mussels in the Big River. C. Perron replied that the Natural Heritage Bureau did not report any mussel populations in the vicinity of the project. L. Sommer asked if the bridge would be closed to traffic during construction. J. Lund replied that it would be closed and a temporary detour on existing roads would be implemented. Carol Henderson commented that Fish & Game would prefer that a portion of the channel be kept open at all times throughout construction. J. Magee commented that he would recommend the use of wildlife-friendly erosion control matting if matting will be needed. This project has not been previously discussed at a Monthly Natural Resource Agency

Coordination Meeting. Meredith 10430, STP-F-X-0241(014) Christine Perron introduced the project, which is located on US Route 3 and NH Route 25 in Meredith Village. The project begins at approximately the Meredith Fire Station and extends north on US 3 through the intersection of US 3 and NH 25 to a point approximately 750 feet north of the intersection with Main Street, and east on NH 25 to the intersection of Pleasant Street. The purpose of the project is to make improvements to the overall operation of the US Route 3/NH Route 25/Main Street intersection and its approaches, and to improve pedestrian safety within the project area. The project has been developed through coordination with a stakeholders group known as the Public Advisory Committee (PAC), formed in early 2006. The project as now proposed is the culmination of over nine years of input from the PAC, town officials, and the general public. The final result of this coordination was that, due to impacts to businesses and underground utilities, the Town did not support the alternatives that were developed during the study phase that sought to address congestion issues. The project has therefore been scaled back and now consists of operation modifications to enhance existing infrastructure, including minor improvements in lane configuration and signals. Brian Patinskas provided an overview of the proposed design. The project will entail milling and overlay of pavement with some minor changes to the pavement markings. The US 3 northbound approach geometry will be altered to remove one of the northbound through lanes. This will give more area for turning vehicles and merging without widening the road. New traffic signal and equipment will be installed at the US 3/NH 25/Main Street intersection, including mast arms, conduits, signal heads, pedestrian equipment, and emergency vehicle preemption. To maximize the number of vehicles that can pass through the intersection, an Adaptive Traffic Signal Control System will be used to optimize the operations of the intersection. A mid-block signalized Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (PHB) will be installed between Dover Street and Lake Street. The old crosswalks at Dover Street and Lake Street will be removed. A remotely activated Emergency Hybrid Beacon at the Fire Station will be installed so that traffic can be stopped to allow fire trucks to exit the building to respond to calls.

The project will include improvements to the existing catch basins, sidewalks, curbing, and wheelchair ramps along US 3 and NH 25 as well as improvements to the entrance and exit of the Town Dock parking area. Pavement widths will not be changing. There is potential for some portions of sidewalk to be removed along NH 25.

November 16th Natural Resource Agency Coordination Meeting

Page 7

The bridge that carries US 3 over the Lake Waukewan Outlet (Bridge 186/145) will be rehabilitated. Proposed work will consist of rehabilitation of the culvert top slab to include partial and full depth slab repairs, new membrane and pavement, concrete repairs to the sidewalks, and curb replacement. No work in the water will be necessary.

Culverts will be replaced at two locations: twin 36” concrete culverts that carry an unnamed stream under US 3 near Lake Street, and two 15” drainage pipes at the end of Lake Street. These culvert replacements are the only work that will require work in the water. Final design of this project is just getting underway. Permit applications will be submitted within the next few months and tentative advertising date for the project is July 2017. Construction would begin after Labor Day weekend to minimize traffic disruptions. C. Perron provided an overview of resources in the project area and proposed impacts. Wetlands are located in the project area but will not be impacted. The wetland associated with Hawkins Brook had been designated as a Prime Wetland; however, Gino Infascelli indicated that the town had removed this designation and the DES map had not yet been updated. The only impacts in jurisdictional areas will be the culvert replacements, which will impact an intermittent stream and the edge of the lake. In addition, the project will require a Shoreland Permit By Notification for earth disturbance within the Protected Shoreland of Lake Winnipesaukee. Surface waters in the project area are listed as impaired waters. The lake is impaired by cyanobacteria and hepatotoxic microcystins, and Hawkins Brook and Lake Waukewan Outlet are both impaired by dissolved oxygen saturation and pH. There are a number of constraints and challenges associated with providing stormwater treatment in the project area. The project area is fully developed and the Town of Meredith has requested that any proposed work avoid impacts to businesses and underground utilities. The open space that does exist in the project area consists of parks and recreational sites that are protected under Section 4(f) and Section 6(f). Given these constraints, the only BMP that is feasible is deep sump catch basins, which would be provided where catch basins will be replaced within the project area. The project will not increase the area of impervious surface and there may be small areas of sidewalk that are replaced with grass. The twin pipes that carry an intermittent stream have a drainage area of 0.15 square miles, making this a Tier 1 stream crossing. The pipes will be replaced in-kind. The replacement of these pipes and the 15” drainage pipes will result in 254 square feet and 47 linear feet of permanent impact to channel, banks, and lakebed, 241 square feet of temporary impact. There is no suitable habitat within the project for northern long-eared bat or small whorled pogonia. Section 106 consultation resulted in a finding that no historic properties would be affected by the project. No concerns were raised with the project as proposed.

This project has been previously discussed at the 5/21/1992, 6/15/1995, 4/16/1997, 5/18/2005,

9/17/2008, 1/21/2009, and 6/18/2014 Monthly Natural Resource Agency Coordination Meetings.

Ossipee 10431, (Non-Federal)

Rebecca Martin explained that the team had hoped to have furthered the design of the stormwater treatment area to discuss at this meeting. However, after further investigation it was determined

24

MITIGATION CORRESPONDENCE

1

Christine J. Perron

From: Sommer, Lori <[email protected]>Sent: Monday, April 03, 2017 11:46 AMTo: Christine J. PerronSubject: RE: Meredith 10430

Hi Christine, What a cold night that was but such great music for sure! It looks like there is enough existing disturbance at the outlet that I don’t feel we would require mitigation. Are they removing any of the sediment at the outlet – looks like it has accumulated at the end of the pipes. Thanks for running it by me and hope to see you around. Lori

From: Christine J. Perron [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 4:25 PM To: Sommer, Lori Cc: Infascelli, Gino Subject: Meredith 10430 Hi Lori, It was nice to see you at the concert in New Hampton a few weeks ago! I didn’t get a chance to stop and say hello – I hope you enjoyed the music. Ken’s daughter is very talented. I wanted to touch base with you about Meredith. This project was last discussed at the November resource agency meeting: https://www.nh.gov/dot/org/projectdevelopment/environment/units/project‐management/documents/NovemberFinalMinutes.pdf The replacement of twin 36” concrete pipes was presented at the meeting. The pipes carry an intermittent stream under Route 3 and outlet into Lake Winnipesaukee. Since the meeting, it was determined that lining the pipes with a thermoplastic Close Fit Liner would adequately address the deteriorating joints of the concrete pipe sections, extend the life span of the pipes, and eliminate impacts outside existing right‐of‐way. A small area of riprap will be placed at the inlet of the pipes to stabilize the area that will be disturbed during construction to install the liner and reconstruct the headwall. The proposed riprap would result in 20 linear feet of permanent impact to the channel at the inlet. Photos are attached. The riprap is proposed for the protection of existing infrastructure. Do you think mitigation is needed for the 20 LF of impact? Let me know if you need any additional information. Thanks, Christine Christine Perron, CWS • Senior Environmental Analyst McFarland Johnson 53 Regional Drive • Concord, NH 03301 OFFICE: 603-225-2978 ext. 128

26

NHB DATACHECK RESULTS LETTER

The NH Natural Heritage database has been checked for records of rare species and exemplary naturalcommunities near the area mapped below. The species considered include those listed as Threatened orEndangered by either the state of New Hampshire or the federal government. We currently have no recordedoccurrences for sensitive species near this project area.

A negative result (no record in our database) does not mean that a sensitive species is not present. Our datacan only tell you of known occurrences, based on information gathered by qualified biologists and reported toour office. However, many areas have never been surveyed, or have only been surveyed for certain species.An on-site survey would provide better information on what species and communities are indeed present.

This report is valid through 3/20/2018.

New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau

To: Christine Perron53 Regional DriveConcord, NH 03301

Date: 3/21/2017

From: NH Natural Heritage Bureau

Re: Review by NH Natural Heritage Bureau of request dated 3/21/2017

NHB File ID: NHB17-0841 Applicant: Christine Perron

Location: Tax Map(s)/Lot(s):Meredith

Project Description: The overall project consists of operational modifications toenhance existing infrastructure, including minorimprovements in lane configuration and signals. Work injurisdictional areas involves sliplining twin 36” concreteculverts that carry an intermittent stream under US 3 nearLake Street. The culverts outlet into Lake Winnipesaukee.

Department of Resources and Economic Development DRED/NHBDivision of Forests and Lands 172 Pembroke Road(603) 271-2214 fax: 271-6488 Concord NH 03301

New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau

MAP OF PROJECT BOUNDARIES FOR NHB FILE ID: NHB17-0841

Department of Resources and Economic Development DRED/NHBDivision of Forests and Lands 172 Pembroke Road(603) 271-2214 fax: 271-6488 Concord NH 03301

29

NH FISH & GAME CORRESPONDENCE

1

Christine J. Perron

From: Henderson, Carol <[email protected]>Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2017 12:08 PMTo: Christine J. PerronSubject: RE: Meredith 10430 - stream crossing

Hi Christine: Thanks. NH Fish and Game concurs with the proposed solution to sliplining of the culverts and the method of installation. Thank you, Carol Henderson, NH Fish and Game Dept. Environmental Review Coordinator

From: Christine J. Perron [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2017 11:38 AM To: Henderson, Carol Subject: RE: Meredith 10430 - stream crossing Hi Carol, No problem at all. I’m so sorry to hear about your mother. The culverts do not have a history of flooding. The hydraulic capacity will not be reduced since the proposed liner is very thin and smoother than the existing pipes. Thanks, Christine

From: Henderson, Carol [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2017 11:30 AM To: Christine J. Perron <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Meredith 10430 ‐ stream crossing Hi Christine: Sorry for the delay. I apologize but this fell through the cracks for my review. My month of March was a tailspin since my mother recently passed away unexpectedly and the family has been dealing with my father. Couple questions: Have these culverts had problems in the past with flood. Do you think that it will significantly reduce the amount of water through the pipes from this lining? Thanks, Carol

From: Christine J. Perron [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2017 3:09 PM To: Henderson, Carol Subject: RE: Meredith 10430 - stream crossing Hi Carol, I just wanted to check in to see if you have had a chance to consider the email below. Hope all is well! Christine

2

From: Christine J. Perron Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 10:46 AM To: Carol Henderson <[email protected]> Subject: Meredith 10430 ‐ stream crossing Hi Carol, This project was last discussed at the November resource agency meeting: https://www.nh.gov/dot/org/projectdevelopment/environment/units/project‐management/documents/NovemberFinalMinutes.pdf The replacement of twin 36” concrete pipes was presented at the meeting. The pipes are a Tier 1 stream crossing, carrying an intermittent stream under Route 3 and outletting into Lake Winnipesaukee. Since the meeting, it was determined that lining the pipes with a thermoplastic Close Fit Liner would adequately address the deteriorating joints of the concrete pipe sections, extend the life span of the pipes, and eliminate impacts outside existing right‐of‐way. The proposed liner is very thin and will only reduce the diameter of the culverts a negligible amount. The culverts are not currently perched and will not be perched after lining. The culverts are 135’ in length and at a slope of 1%. Stream flow will be diverted through one culvert at a time during construction. There are no NHB records in this area. Since we will not be returning to the resource agency meeting before the permit application is submitted, I wanted to touch base with you via email for feedback on the proposed sliplining. Thank you! Christine Christine Perron, CWS • Senior Environmental Analyst McFarland Johnson 53 Regional Drive • Concord, NH 03301 OFFICE: 603-225-2978 ext. 128 www.mjinc.com

32

USFWS OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST

United States Department of the Interior

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICENew England Ecological Services Field Office

70 COMMERCIAL STREET, SUITE 300CONCORD, NH 03301

PHONE: (603)223-2541 FAX: (603)223-0104URL: www.fws.gov/newengland

Consultation Code: 05E1NE00-2016-SLI-1124 March 22, 2016Event Code: 05E1NE00-2016-E-01574Project Name: Meredith 10430

Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed projectlocation, and/or may be affected by your proposed project

To Whom It May Concern:

The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, aswell as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary ofyour proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfillsthe requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of theEndangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 ).et seq.

New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution ofspecies, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free tocontact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts tofederally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed criticalhabitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 ofthe Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification canbe completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification becompleted by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning andimplementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requestedthrough the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosedlist.

The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species andthe ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2)of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 ), Federal agencies are requiredet seq.to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened andendangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangeredspecies and/or designated critical habitat.

cperron

Typewritten Text

Exhibit 2

A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings havingsimilar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of thehuman environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biologicalevaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project mayaffect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommendedcontents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.

If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation,that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, theagency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Servicerecommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressedwithin the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "EndangeredSpecies Consultation Handbook" at:

http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF

Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden EagleProtection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 ), and projects affecting these species may requireet seq.development of an eagle conservation plan(http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projectsshould follow the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizingimpacts to migratory birds and bats.

Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communicationstowers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at:http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm;http://www.towerkill.com; andhttp://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/comtow.html.

We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encouragesFederal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their projectplanning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number inthe header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your projectthat you submit to our office.

Attachment

2

http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 03/22/2016 01:21 PM 1

Official Species List

Provided by: New England Ecological Services Field Office

70 COMMERCIAL STREET, SUITE 300

CONCORD, NH 03301

(603) 223-2541

http://www.fws.gov/newengland Consultation Code: 05E1NE00-2016-SLI-1124Event Code: 05E1NE00-2016-E-01574 Project Type: TRANSPORTATION Project Name: Meredith 10430Project Description: US Route 3/NH Route 25 from just south of the Lake Street/US Route 3intersection to the Pleasant Street/NH Route 25 intersection. The project is proposingimprovements to the US Route 3/NH Route 25 intersection and to pedestrian safety in the vicinityof the intersection. Please Note: The FWS office may have modified the Project Name and/or Project Description, so itmay be different from what was submitted in your previous request. If the Consultation Codematches, the FWS considers this to be the same project. Contact the office in the 'Provided by'section of your previous Official Species list if you have any questions or concerns.

United States Department of InteriorFish and Wildlife Service

Project name: Meredith 10430


Project Location Map:

Project Coordinates: MULTIPOLYGON (((-71.50056838989258 43.65908579683592, -71.50016069412231 43.65826303116789, -71.50028944015503 43.65813883914434, -71.49994611740112 43.65798359875369, -71.49777889251709 43.655018430248695, -71.497585773468 43.65503395507241, -71.49979591369629 43.658169887174296, -71.49715662002563 43.65944284258017, -71.49737119674683 43.659520460939255, -71.50001049041748 43.65837169897778, -71.50024652481079 43.659132368140334, -71.50056838989258 43.65908579683592))) Project Counties: Belknap, NH




Endangered Species Act Species List

There are a total of 2 threatened or endangered species on your species list. Species on this list should be considered in

an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain

fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. Critical habitats listed under the

Has Critical Habitat column may or may not lie within your project area. See the Critical habitats within your

project area section further below for critical habitat that lies within your project. Please contact the designated FWS

office if you have questions.

Flowering Plants Status Has Critical Habitat Condition(s)

Small Whorled pogonia (Isotria

medeoloides)

Threatened

Mammals

Northern long-eared Bat (Myotis

septentrionalis)

Threatened




Critical habitats that lie within your project areaThere are no critical habitats within your project area.



39

NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES AFFECTED MEMO

42

ARMY CORPS APPENDIX B

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers New Hampshire Programmatic General Permit (PGP)

Appendix B - Corps Secondary Impacts Checklist (for inland wetland/waterway fill projects in New Hampshire)

1. Attach any explanations to this checklist. Lack of information could delay a Corps permit determination. 2. All references to “work” include all work associated with the project construction and operation. Work includes filling, clearing, flooding, draining, excavation, dozing, stumping, etc. 3. See PGP, GC 5 regarding single and complete projects. 4. Contact the Corps at (978) 318-8832 with any questions. 1. Impaired Waters Yes No 1.1 Will any work occur within 1 mile upstream in the watershed of an impaired water? See http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/section401/impaired_waters.htm to determine if there is an impaired water in the vicinity of your work area.*

X

2. Wetlands Yes No 2.1 Are there are streams, brooks, rivers, ponds, or lakes within 200 feet of any proposed work? X 2.2 Are there proposed impacts to SAS, shellfish beds, special wetlands and vernal pools (see PGP, GC 26 and Appendix A)? Applicants may obtain information from the NH Department of Resources and Economic Development Natural Heritage Bureau (NHB) website, www.nhnaturalheritage.org, specifically the book Natural Community Systems of New Hampshire.

X

2.3 If wetland crossings are proposed, are they adequately designed to maintain hydrology, sediment transport & wildlife passage?

X

2.4 Would the project remove part or all of a riparian buffer? (Riparian buffers are lands adjacent to streams where vegetation is strongly influenced by the presence of water. They are often thin lines of vegetation containing native grasses, flowers, shrubs and/or trees that line the stream banks. They are also called vegetated buffer zones.)

X

2.5 The overall project site is more than 40 acres. X 2.6 What is the size of the existing impervious surface area? 196,020 SF 2.7 What is the size of the proposed impervious surface area? -1,100 SF 2.8 What is the % of the impervious area (new and existing) to the overall project site? 60% 3. Wildlife Yes No 3.1 Has the NHB determined that there are known occurrences of rare species, exemplary natural communities, Federal and State threatened and endangered species and habitat, in the vicinity of the proposed project? (All projects require a NHB determination.)

X

3.2 Would work occur in any area identified as either “Highest Ranked Habitat in N.H.” or “Highest Ranked Habitat in Ecological Region”? (These areas are colored magenta and green, respectively, on NH Fish and Game’s map, “2010 Highest Ranked Wildlife Habitat by Ecological Condition.”) Map information can be found at: PDF: www.wildlife.state.nh.us/Wildlife/Wildlife_Plan/highest_ranking_habitat.htm. Data Mapper: www.granit.unh.edu. GIS: www.granit.unh.edu/data/downloadfreedata/category/databycategory.html.

X

3.3 Would the project impact more than 20 acres of an undeveloped land block (upland, wetland/waterway) on the entire project site and/or on an adjoining property(s)?

X

3.4 Does the project propose more than a 10-lot residential subdivision, or a commercial or industrial development?

X

3.5 Are stream crossings designed in accordance with the PGP, GC 21? X

NH PGP – Appendix B August 2012

http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/section401/impaired_waters.htm

http://www.nhnaturalheritage.org/

http://www.wildlife.state.nh.us/Wildlife/Wildlife_Plan/highest_ranking_habitat.htm

http://www.granit.unh.edu/

http://www.granit.unh.edu/data/downloadfreedata/category/databycategory.html

4. Flooding/Floodplain Values Yes No 4.1 Is the proposed project within the 100-year floodplain of an adjacent river or stream? X 4.2 If 4.1 is yes, will compensatory flood storage be provided if the project results in a loss of flood storage?

n/a

5. Historic/Archaeological Resources If a minor or major impact project, has a copy of the Request for Project Review (RPR) Form (www.nh.gov/nhdhr/review) been sent to the NH Division of Historical Resources as required on Page 5 of the PGP?**

X

*Although this checklist utilizes state information, its submittal to the Corps is a Federal requirement. ** If project is not within Federal jurisdiction, coordination with NH DHR is not required under Federal law. `

NH PGP – Appendix B August 2012

http://www.nh.gov/nhdhr/review

NH Department of Transportation Bureau of Highway Design

Meredith, 10430

ACOE Appendix B Supplemental Narrative

1.1 Will any work occur within 1 mile upstream in the watershed of an impaired water? The NHDES draft 2014 List of All Impaired Waters (most recent available) identifies surface water impairments for Lake Winnipesaukee (Assessment Unit ID NHLAK700020110-02-19), Hawkins Brook (Assessment Unit ID NHRIV700020109-02), and Lake Waukewan Outlet (Assessment Unit ID NHRIV700020109-06) (see Figure 3). The lake is impaired for primary contact recreation by cyanobacteria and hepatotoxic microcystins. Both streams are impaired for aquatic life by dissolved oxygen saturation and pH. Runoff from the project area is not currently treated in any formalized treatment areas and is discharged directly into Lake Winnipesaukee. There are a number of environmental and engineering constraints and challenges associated with providing stormwater treatment in the project area. The project area is fully developed and the Town of Meredith has requested that any proposed work minimize impacts to businesses and utilities. The open space that does exist in the vicinity of the project consists of recreational sites that are protected under Section 4(f) and Section 6(f). Given these constraints, the only BMP that is feasible is deep sump catch basins, which will be provided where catch basins will be replaced within the project area.

The project will not change the existing roadway alignment, profile, or width. The overall area of

impervious surface will be redcued by approximately 1,100 sq ft.

3.1 Has the NHB determined that there are known occurrences of rare species, exemplary natural communities, Federal and State threatened and endangered species and habitat, in the vicinity of the proposed project?

The NH Natural Heritage Bureau has no records of sensitive species or natural communities of concern in the vicinity of the project. The USFWS Information, Planning, and Conservation System (IPaC) web tool was utilized to determine if federally listed species have the potential to occur in the project area. According to IPaC, the federally-threatened small whorled pogonia and northern long-eared bat are potential concerns in this region of New Hampshire. The project is located in a developed area with no forested habitat; therefore there is no suitable habitat within the project area for either of these species.

45

PHOTOGRAPHS

NH Department of Transportation Meredith, 10430

Photo 1 - Near start of project, facing north on US Route 3/NH Route 25 (11/17/2016)

Photo 2 – View south toward outlet of twin 36” culverts (10/30/16)


Photo 3 – Outlet of twin 36” culverts – Impact Location G (10/4/2016)

Photo 4 – Outlet of twin 36” culverts (10/4/2016)


Photo 5 – Standing at outlet of twin 36” culverts, facing north (10/30/2016)


Photo 6 – Inlet of twin 36” culverts – Impact Locations A - F (10/30/2016)


Photo 7 – inlet of twin 36” culverts (10/4/2016)

Photo 8 – Stream channel upstream from twin 36” culverts (10/4/2016)

52

CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE

NH Department of Transportation Bureau of Highway Design

Meredith, 10430

Construction Sequence

The advertisement date is July 18, 2017.

Start of construction is September 5, 2017.

U.S. Route 3 drainage installation, bridge repair, and mill and overlay will take place in 2017/2018.

N.H. Route 25 drainage installation and mill and overlay will take place in 2017/2018.

US Route 3 Construction Sequencing Notes

1. Install Construction Signs and Warning Devices. 2. Construct temporary erosion control (i.e. perimeter controls). The temporary erosion

and perimeter controls need to be maintained throughout construction. 3. Shift traffic to the right side of the existing road and repair the left side of the existing

box culvert. 4. Shift traffic to the left side of the existing road and repair the right side of the existing

box culvert. 5. Shift traffic to the existing lane configuration. 6. Install water diversion structure and construct UV cured-in-place liner. 7. Install new drainage and adjust existing drainage structures. 8. Construct new sidewalks. 9. Install new traffic and pedestrian signals. 10. Construct final wearing course and pavement markings.

NH Route 25 Construction Sequencing Notes

1. Install Construction Signs and Warning Devices. 2. Construct temporary erosion control (i.e. perimeter controls). The temporary erosion

and perimeter controls need to be maintained throughout construction. 3. Install new drainage and adjust existing drainage structures. 4. Construct new sidewalks. 5. Install new traffic and pedestrian signals. 6. Construct final wearing course and pavement markings.

52

WETLAND IMPACT PLANS & EROSION CONTROL PLANS

TE

H

ST

ATE

OF NEW HAM

PS

HI

RE

DE

PA

RT

M

ENT OF TRANSP

O

RT

ATI

ON

GRI

D

10430

DESIGN DATA

PERCENT OF TRUCKS

DESIGN SPEED

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC

LENGTH OF PROJECT


GRAPHIC SCALE

01 1/2 1 2 mi.

M cFarlandJohnson

cM FARLAND JOHNSON

DESIGN DATA

PERCENT OF TRUCKS

DESIGN SPEED


LENGTH OF PROJECT


MA

L

35 MPH

REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE NO. 203/087OF PROPOSED

NH ROUTE 3A OVER INTERSTATE 93

SCALE = 1" = 250'

0.46 MILES

35 MPH

14,100

11,0002013

2037

2.0%

2015

2037

21,000

22,400

2.0%

LOCATION MAP

CONSTRUCTION

BEGIN

STA 241+23.04

CONSTRUCTION

END

STA 72+19.68

240+00245

+00

250+00

255+00

260+00 265+00

51

+00

63

+00

68

+00

72+00

91

+00

US ROUTE 3 STA 253+16.95 AHEAD

US ROUTE 3 STA 253+16.95, RT 6.00' BACK =

LAKE WINNIPESAUKEE

LIMIT OF WORK

STA 51+04.00LIMIT OF WORK

STA 265+70.00

LIMIT OF WORK

STA 91+65.04

U.S. R

OUTE 3

N.H. ROUTE 25

U.S. ROUTE 3/

WHITTIE

R

HI

GH

WA

Y

N.

H.

RO

UTE 25/

STREET

PLE

AS

ANT

LA

KE

ST

RE

ET

OA

K

ST

RE

ET

LAKE WINNIPESAUKEE

TE

H

ST

AT

E

OF

NE

W

H

AMPSHIRE

DEPARTME

N

T

OF

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TION

GRID

25

25

3

3

LA

KE

WI

NNI

PE

SA

UK

EE

LA

KE

WA

UKE

WA

N

MEREDITH

MEREDITH

LACONIA GILFORD

HAMPTON

NEW

HARBOR

CENTER

HOLDERNESS

HARBOR

CENTER

106

104

NH PROJECT NO. 10430

DATE

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND CHIEF ENGINEER DATE

APPROVED:

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:

DIRECTOR OF PROJECT DEVELOPMENT DATE

NEW HAMPSHIRE

DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION

THE STATE OF

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

APPROVED:

DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR DATE

TOTAL SHEETSSHEET NO.STATE PROJECT NO.FEDERAL PROJECT NO.

110430STP-F-X-0241(014)CH

EC

KE

D

BY

DR

AW

N

BY

DA

TE

DA

TE

BUREAU OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE

MUNICIPAL HIGHWAYS ENGINEER

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AID PROJECT

STP-F-X-0241(014)

NH PROJECT NO.10430

U.S. ROUTE 3 AND N.H. ROUTE 25

U.S. ROUTE 3

N.H. ROUTE 25

0.18 MILES

CENTER HARBOR

TO

LAC

ONI

A

TO

CE

NTE

R

HA

RB

OR

TO

186/145

BRIDGE NO.

EW

M

12

COUNTY OF BELKNAP

TOWN OF MEREDITH

WETLAND PLANS PREPARED BY

3/2017

3/

2017

WETLANDS PLANS

CONCORD, N.H.

SHEET NO. 5IMPACT AREA

WETLAND

DELINEATION: OCT 4, 2016

TELEPHONE POLE

POWER POLE

JOINT OCCUPANCY

MISCELLANEOUS/UNKNOWN POLE

POLE STATUS:

AS APPLICABLE e.g.:

LIGHT POLE

LIGHT ON POWER POLE

LIGHT ON JOINT POLE

(plot point at face

not center of symbol)

RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

TOWN LINE

COUNTY LINE

STATE LINE

BOUND

DRILL HOLE IN ROCK

NATIONAL FOREST

(label type)

BOW

CONCORD

COOS

GRAFTON

MAINE

IRON PIPE OR PIN

NHDOT PROJECT MARKER

PEDESTAL WITH PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL

HEADS AND PUSH BUTTON UNIT

CONTROLLER CABINET

METER PEDESTAL

PULL BOX

LOOP DETECTOR (QUADRUPOLE)

LOOP DETECTOR (RECTANGULAR)

(label size)

(label size)

PROPERTY PARCEL NUMBER

HISTORIC PROPERTY

WATER SHUT OFF

GAS SHUT OFF

RAILROAD

RAILROAD SIGN

RAILROAD SIGNAL

(label ownership)

HYDRANT

UTILITY JUNCTION BOX

MAST ARM (existing)

OPTICOM RECEIVER

OPTICOM STROBE

MANHOLE

CATCH BASIN

DROP INLET

DRAINAGE PIPE (existing)

EROSION CONTROL/ STONE

SLOPE PROTECTION

(existing)

DRAINAGE

BOUNDARIES / RIGHT-OF-WAY

UTILITIES

di

cb (PROPOSED)

RCP

g os

H Y D

12

DRAINAGE PIPE (PROPOSED)

HEADER (existing & PROPOSED)

REMOVE, LEAVE, PROPOSED, OR TEMPORARYEND SECTION (existing & PROPOSED)

OPEN DITCH (PROPOSED)

SEWER

TELEPHONE

ELECTRICAL

GAS

30' MA

NEW HAMPSHIRE

S/L T/L

bnd

TOWN LINE MONUMENT

STATE LINE/

of flow

direction

show& type)

(label size

& type)

(label size

W/ FLUSHING BASIN

UNDERDRAIN (PROPOSED)

STAN'S SI

GN

MANHOLES

TRAFFIC SIGNAL

RR RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE

PROPERTY LINE (COMMON OWNER)

TAX MAP AND LOT NUMBER

protection)

(with stone outlet

6.80 Ac.±

1642/341

14

156

note if abandoned)

label size, type and

(on existing lines

UNDERGROUND UTILITIES

W/ FLUSHING BASINUNDERDRAIN (existing)

L P+04

25.0'

R T+04

25.0'

jb

M H T

M H E

M H S

M H G

SOG

W

SO

m h

e

m h

g

hy d

m ht

m h

s

wso

cc

pb

mp

PB

MP

(NOTE ANGLE FROM Å)

FENCING NOTE

CLEARING AND GRUBBING AREA

DRAINAGE NOTE

GUARDRAIL NOTE

G-1

B-1

LIGHTING NOTE

EROSION CONTROL NOTE

A

1

A

A

1

A

CONSTRUCTION NOTES

(PROPOSED)

GUY POLE OR PUSH BRACE

BENCH MARK / SURVEY DISK

METAL or PLASTIC

CURB MARK NUMBER - GRANITE

CURB MARK NUMBER - BITUMINOUS

fb

TELEPHONE

ELECTRIC

GAS

LIGHTING

FIBER OPTIC

INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

WATER

SEWER

JB

CC

SIGNAL CONDUIT

PROPOSEDexistingPROPOSEDexisting

dh

ip

1TRAFFIC SIGNAL NOTE

SHEET 2 OF 2

m h

uUNKNOWN

m hd

TRAFFIC SIGNALS / ITS

ITS NOTE 1

FIBER OPTIC DELINEATOR

s vf

ITSitsVS F

FODfod

VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT SIGN

DYNAMIC MESSAGE SIGN

FIBER OPTIC SPLICE VAULT

ROAD AND WEATHER INFO SYSTEM

CAMERA POLE (CCTV)

ITS EQUIPMENT CABINET

CONSERVATION LAND

STATE PROJECT NO. SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS

10430

DGN

$FILENAME$


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF HIGHWAY DESIGN

STANDARD SYMBOLS

OVERHEAD WIRE

(label type)

REVISION DATE

9-1-2016 2 12

w

DRIVEWAYS

BUILDINGS

FOUNDATION

STEPS AND WALK

INTERMITTENT WATER COURSE

SHORE LINE

BRUSH OR WOODS LINE

TREES (PLANS)

HEDGE

WELL

SEPTIC TANK

LEACH FIELD

GAS PUMP

FUEL TANK (ABOVE GROUND)

GRAVE

ROCK OUTCROP

ORIGINAL GROUND

(TYPICALS & SECTIONS ONLY)

(TYPICALS)

ROCK LINE

STONE WALL

RETAINING WALL (LABEL TYPE)

SIGNS

MAILBOX

(label type)

(label type)

river/stream

(deciduous)(coniferous) (stump)

(double post)

(single post)

(label type)

SATELLITE DISH ANTENNA

DELINEATED WETLAND

BORING LOCATION

TEST PIT

CONSTRUCTION BASELINE

PC, PT, POT (ON CONST BASELINE)

PI (IN CONSTRUCTION BASELINES)

INTERSECTION OR EQUATION OF

TWO LINES

ORIGINAL GROUND LINE

(PROFILES AND CROSS-SECTIONS)

PROFILE GRADE LINE

(PROFILES AND CROSS-SECTIONS)

SLOPE LINE (FILL)

SLOPE LINE (CUT)

ORIGINAL GROUND ELEVATION (LEFT)

FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION (RIGHT)

INTERSTATE NUMBERED HIGHWAY

UNITED STATES NUMBERED HIGHWAY

STATE NUMBERED HIGHWAY

PROFILES AND CROSS SECTIONS:

(label surface type)

pond

(label size & type)

FLAG POLE

ENGINEERING

SLOPE LINE

79.1

4

72.5

CLEARING LINE

EDGE OF PAVEMENT

TRAVELED WAY

ROADWAY

PROPOSED

roadway

existing

outside slope lines)

(pavement removed

be removed)

(building to

of building)

(label house or type

water body)

(label name of

fp

field

leach

retained ground)

(points toward

s

gp

ft

gr

mb

da

vpVENT PIPE

PHONE

TIDAL BUFFER ZONE

ORDINARY HIGH WATER

SPECIAL AQUATIC SITE

TOP OF BANK

TOP OF BANK & ORDINARY HIGH WATER

VERNAL POOL

INVASIVE SPECIES

SLOPE LINE

CLEARING LINE

30 31 32

GENERAL

ph

STORAGE TANK FILLER CAP

2

PUB2E

cgr

JERSEY BARRIER

fc

B

WATER FRONT BUFFER

NATURAL WOODLAND BUFFER

POTENTIAL WET AREA SYMBOL

MONITORING WELL

II

I.S.

I

I.S.INVASIVE SPECIES LABEL

TP

PRIME WETLAND

WETLAND DESIGNATION AND TYPE

293

3

102

BRIDGE CROSSINGS

STREAM OVERPASS

TREE OR STUMP (CROSS-SECTIONS)

(show station, circumference in feet & type)

existing PROPOSED

500 YEAR FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY

100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY

FLOODPLAIN / FLOODWAY

FLOODWAY

GROUND LIGHT/LAMP POST gl lp

FENCE (LABEL TYPE)

CURB (LABEL TYPE)

w

mon

SHEET 1 OF 2

NON-JURISDICTIONAL DRAINAGE AREA

COWARDIN DISTINCTION LINE

PRIME WETLAND 100' BUFFER

WIDTH AT BANK FULL

MEAN HIGH WATER

MEAN LOW WATER

DEVELOPED TIDAL BUFFER ZONE

REFERENCE LINE

SHORELAND - WETLAND

GUARDRAIL (label type)bgr

NORMAL HIGH WATER

HIGHEST OBSERVABLE TIDE LINE

PROTECTED SHORELAND

REVISION DATE

11-21-2014


10430

DGN

$FILENAME$



STANDARD SYMBOLS

3 12

LEVEL OF PROTECTION TO STRUCTURES AND DOWN-GRADIENT SENSITIVE RECEPTORS.

DROP INLET SEDIMENT BARRIERS SHOULD NEVER BE USED AS THE PRIMARY MEANS OF SEDIMENT CONTROL AND SHOULD ONLY BE USED TO PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL 8.4.

CLEAN CATCH BASINS, DRAINAGE PIPES, AND CULVERTS IF SIGNIFICANT SEDIMENT IS DEPOSITED.8.3.

INSTALL SEDIMENT BARRIERS AND SEDIMENT TRAPS AT INLETS TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM.8.2.

DIVERT SEDIMENT LADEN WATER AWAY FROM INLET STRUCTURES TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE.8.1.

PROTECT STORM DRAIN INLETS: 8.

DETENTION BASINS SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO ACCOMMODATE A 2 YEAR STORM EVENT.12.7.

ALL AREAS THAT CAN BE STABILIZED SHALL BE STABILIZED PRIOR TO OPENING UP NEW TERRITORY.12.6.

GRAVEL, OR CRUSHED STONE BASE TO HELP MINIMIZE EROSION ISSUES.

FOR HAUL ROADS ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS OR STEEPER THAN 5%, THE DEPARTMENT WILL CONSIDER USING EROSION STONE, CRUSHED 12.5.

AREAS WHERE HAUL ROADS ARE CONSTRUCTED AND STORMWATER CANNOT BE TREATED THE DEPARTMENT WILL CONSIDER INFILTRATION.12.4.

SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER WILL RECEIVE TURF ESTABLISHMENT ALONE.12.3.

SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 WILL RECEIVE TURF ESTABLISHMENT WITH MATTING.12.2.

STRATEGIES.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH RSA 485:A:17 AND ENV-WQ 1500; ALTERATION OF TERRAIN FOR CONSTRUCTION AND USE ALL CONVENTIONAL BMP 12.1.

STRATEGIES SPECIFIC TO OPEN AREAS LESS THAN 5 ACRES:12.

TABLE 1

GUIDANCE ON SELECTING TEMPORARY SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES

EROSION CONTROL STRATEGIES

NOTES:

2. PRODUCTS CONTAINING POLYACRYLAMIDE (PAM) SHALL NOT BE APPLIED DIRECTLY TO OR WITHIN 100 FEET OF ANY SURFACE

3. ALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS SHALL BE MADE WITH WILDLIFE FRIENDLY BIODEGRADABLE NETTING.

1

SLOPES

CHANNELS

APPLICATION AREAS DRY MULCH METHODS HYDRAULICALLY APPLIED MULCHES2

ROLLED EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS3

HMT WC SG CB HM SMM BFM FRM SNSB DNSB DNSCB DNCB

STEEPER THAN 2:1 NO NO YES NO NO NO NO YES NO NO NO YES

2:1 SLOPE YES YES YES YES NO NO YES YES NO YES YES YES

3:1 SLOPE YES YES YES YES NO YES YES YES YES YES YES NO

4:1 SLOPE YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO NO

WINTER STABILIZATION 4T/AC YES YES YES NO NO YES YES YES YES YES YES

LOW FLOW CHANNELS NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO YES YES

HIGH FLOW CHANNELS NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO YES

ABBREV. STABILIZATION MEASURE ABBREV. STABILIZATION MEASURE ABBREV. STABILIZATION MEASURE

HMT HAY MULCH & TACK HM HYDRAULIC MULCH SNSB SINGLE NET STRAW BLANKET

WC WOOD CHIPS SMM STABILIZED MULCH MATRIX DNSB DOUBLE NET STRAW BLANKET

SG STUMP GRINDINGS BFM BONDED FIBER MATRIX DNSCB 2 NET STRAW-COCONUT BLANKET

CB COMPOST BLANKET FRM DNCB 2 NET COCONUT BLANKET

WATER WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE NH DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES.

1. ALL SLOPE STABILIZATION OPTIONS ASSUME A SLOPE LENGTH \10 TIMES THE HORIZONTAL DISTANCE COMPONENT OF THE SLOPE, IN FEET.

FIBER REINFORCED MEDIUM

GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PLANNING AND SELECTION OF STRATEGIES TO CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENT ON HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

SWEEP ALL CONSTRUCTION RELATED DEBRIS AND SOIL FROM THE ADJACENT PAVED ROADWAYS AS NECESSARY.7.2.

INSTALL AND MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION EXITS, ANYWHERE TRAFFIC LEAVES A CONSTRUCTION SITE ONTO A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.7.1.

ESTABLISH STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITS:7.

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) BASED ON AMOUNT OF OPEN CONSTRUCTION AREA

1 1

HYDROLOGY BEYOND THE PERMITTED AREA.

DIVERT OFF-SITE WATER THROUGH THE PROJECT IN AN APPROPRIATE MANNER SO NOT TO DISTURB THE UPSTREAM OR DOWNSTREAM SOILS, VEGETATION OR 5.5.

AND DISCHARGE LOCATIONS PRIOR TO USE.

STABILIZE, TO APPROPRIATE ANTICIPATED VELOCITIES, CONVEYANCE CHANNELS OR PUMPING SYSTEMS NEEDED TO CONVEY CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER TO BASINS 5.4.

CONSTRUCT IMPERMEABLE BARRIERS AS NECESSARY TO COLLECT OR DIVERT CONCENTRATED FLOWS FROM WORK OR DISTURBED AREAS.5.3.

LOCATION.

DIVERT STORM RUNOFF FROM UPSLOPE DRAINAGE AREAS AWAY FROM DISTURBED AREAS, SLOPES, AND AROUND ACTIVE WORK AREAS AND TO A STABILIZED OUTLET 5.2.

DIVERT OFF SITE RUNOFF OR CLEAN WATER AWAY FROM THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TO REDUCE THE VOLUME THAT NEEDS TO BE TREATED ON SITE.5.1.

CONTROL STORMWATER FLOWING ONTO AND THROUGH THE PROJECT:5.

WITH SECTION 2.1.2.1. OF THE 2012 NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT.

WHEN WORK IS PERFORMED WITHIN 50 FEET OF SURFACE WATERS (WETLAND, OPEN WATER OR FLOWING WATER), PERIMETER CONTROL SHALL BE ENHANCED CONSISTENT 3.5.

WHEN WORK IS PERFORMED IN AND NEAR WATER COURSES, STREAM FLOW DIVERSION METHODS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION OR FILLING.3.4.

PROTECT AND MAXIMIZE EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION AND NATURAL FOREST BUFFERS BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND SENSITIVE AREAS.3.3.

CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE SEQUENCED TO LIMIT THE DURATION AND AREA OF EXPOSED SOILS.3.2.

CLEARLY FLAG AREAS TO BE PROTECTED IN THE FIELD AND PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION BARRIERS TO PREVENT TRAFFICKING OUTSIDE OF WORK AREAS.3.1.

PLAN ACTIVITIES TO ACCOUNT FOR SENSITIVE SITE CONDITIONS: 3.

MET.

CRITICAL PATH METHOD SCHEDULE (CPM), AND THE CONTRACTOR HAS ADEQUATE RESOURCES AVAILABLE TO ENSURE THAT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS WILL BE

MONTHS, UNLESS THE CONTRACTOR DEMONSTRATES TO THE DEPARTMENT THAT THE ADDITIONAL AREA OF DISTURBANCE IS NECESSARY TO MEET THE CONTRACTORS

, OR EXCEED ONE ACRE DURING WINTER TH

THROUGH NOVEMBER 30ST

THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF DISTURBED EARTH SHALL NOT EXCEED A TOTAL OF 5 ACRES FROM MAY 14.3.

UTILIZE TEMPORARY MULCHING OR PROVIDE ALTERNATE TEMPORARY STABILIZATION ON EXPOSED SOILS IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 1.4.2.

SHALL BE USED TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT AND DURATION OF SOIL EXPOSED TO THE ELEMENTS AND VEHICLE TRACKING.

CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE SEQUENCED TO LIMIT THE DURATION AND AREA OF EXPOSED SOILS. MINIMIZE THE AREA OF EXPOSED SOIL AT ANY ONE TIME. PHASING 4.1.

MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF EXPOSED SOIL:4.

UP AND DOWN THE SLOPE, DISKED, HARROWED, DRAGGED WITH A CHAIN OR MAT, MACHINE-RAKED, OR HAND-WORKED TO PRODUCE A RUFFLED SURFACE.

THE OUTER FACE OF THE FILL SLOPE SHOULD BE IN A LOOSE RUFFLED CONDITION PRIOR TO TURF ESTABLISHMENT. TOPSOIL OR HUMUS LAYERS SHALL BE TRACKED 6.4.

CONVEY STORMWATER DOWN THE SLOPE IN A STABILIZED CHANNEL OR SLOPE DRAIN.6.3.

CONSIDER HOW GROUNDWATER SEEPAGE ON CUT SLOPES MAY IMPACT SLOPE STABILITY AND INCORPORATE APPROPRIATE MEASURES TO MINIMIZE EROSION.6.2.

OUTLET OR CONVEYANCE.

INTERCEPT AND DIVERT STORM RUNOFF FROM UPSLOPE DRAINAGE AREAS AWAY FROM UNPROTECTED AND NEWLY ESTABLISHED AREAS AND SLOPES TO A STABILIZED 6.1.

PROTECT SLOPES:6.

MONITORING OF THE SYSTEM.

DEMONSTRATED EXPERIENCE IN THE DESIGN OF FLOCCULANT TREATMENT SYSTEMS. THE CONSULTANT WILL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION AND

TREAT AND RELEASE WATER CAPTURED IN STORM WATER BASINS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO RETAIN THE SERVICES OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT WHO HAS

THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO HAVE AN APPROVED DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH ENV-WQ 1506.12 FOR AN ACTIVE FLOCCULANT TREATMENT SYSTEM TO 14.3.

AMOUNT OF SEDIMENT IN THE STORMWATER TREATMENT BASINS.

THE DEPARTMENT ANTICIPATES THAT SOIL BINDERS WILL BE NEEDED ON ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1, IN ORDER TO MINIMIZE EROSION AND REDUCE THE 14.2.

TREATMENT OPTIONS USED FOR UNDER 5 ACRES AND BETWEEN 5 AND 10 ACRES WILL BE UTILIZED.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH RSA 485:A:17 AND ENV-WQ 1500 ALTERATION OF TERRAIN AND SHALL USE CONVENTIONAL BMP STRATEGIES AND ALL 14.1.

STRATEGIES SPECIFIC TO OPEN AREAS OVER 10 ACRES:14.

ALSO CONSIDER A SOIL BINDER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NHDES APPROVALS OR REGULATIONS.

SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER WILL RECEIVE TURF ESTABLISHMENT OR OTHER TEMPORARY SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES DETAILED IN TABLE 1. THE CONTRACTOR MAY 13.4.

BONDED FIBER MATRIXES (BFMS) OR FLEXIBLE GROWTH MEDIUMS (FGMS) MAY BE UTILIZED, IF MEETING THE NHDES APPROVALS AND REGULATIONS.

THE CONTRACTOR MAY ALSO CONSIDER A SOIL BINDER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NHDES APPROVALS OR REGULATIONS. OTHER ALTERNATIVE MEASURES, SUCH AS

SLOPES STEEPER THAN A 3:1 WILL RECEIVE TURF ESTABLISHMENT WITH MATTING OR OTHER TEMPORARY SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES DETAILED IN TABLE 1. 13.3.

DETENTION BASINS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO ACCOMMODATE THE 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM EVENT AND CONTROL A 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM EVENT.13.2.

TREATMENT OPTIONS USED FOR UNDER 5 ACRES WILL BE UTILIZED.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH RSA 485:A:17 AND ENV-WQ 1500 ALTERATION OF TERRAIN AND SHALL USE CONVENTIONAL BMP STRATEGIES AND ALL 13.1.

STRATEGIES SPECIFIC TO OPEN AREAS BETWEEN 5 AND 10 ACRES:13.

.TH

30 DAYS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORK SCHEDULED AFTER NOVEMBER 30

(E) A SWPPP AMENDMENT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT, FOR APPROVAL, ADDRESSING COLD WEATHER STABILIZATION (ENV-WQ 1505.05) NO LESS THAN

WINTER STABILIZATION PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED BY NHDOT.

(D) WINTER EXCAVATION AND EARTHWORK SHALL BE DONE SUCH THAT NO MORE THAN 1 ACRE OF THE PROJECT IS WITHOUT STABILIZATION AT ONE TIME, UNLESS A

INCOMPLETE ROAD SURFACES, WHERE WORK HAS STOPPED FOR THE SEASON, SHALL BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 1.TH

AFTER NOVEMBER 30(C)

SHALL BE STABILIZED TEMPORARILY WITH STONE OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 1.

, TH

, OR WHICH ARE DISTURBED AFTER OCTOBER 15TH

ALL DITCHES OR SWALES WHICH DO NOT EXHIBIT A MINIMUM OF 85% VEGETATIVE GROWTH BY OCTOBER 15(B)

, SHALL BE STABILIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 1. TH

15

, OR WHICH ARE DISTURBED AFTER OCTOBER TH

ALL PROPOSED VEGETATED AREAS WHICH DO NOT EXHIBIT A MINIMUM OF 85% VEGETATIVE GROWTH BY OCTOBER 15(A)

FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS.

OF ANY YEAR SHALL BE CONSIDERED WINTER CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE ST

AND MAY 1TH

CONSTRUCTION PERFORMED ANY TIME BETWEEN NOVEMBER 302.8.

TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL REMAIN UNTIL THE AREA HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED.2.7.

A WATER TRUCK SHALL BE AVAILABLE TO CONTROL EXCESSIVE DUST AT THE DIRECTION OF THE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR.2.6.

BE REQUIRED.

ALL STOCKPILES SHALL BE CONTAINED WITH A PERIMETER CONTROL. IF THE STOCKPILE IS TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED FOR MORE THAN 14 DAYS, MULCHING WILL 2.5.

TEMPORARY SLOPE STABILIZATION CONFORMING TO TABLE 1 HAS BEEN PROPERLY INSTALLED (D)

A MINIMUM OF 3" OF NON-EROSIVE MATERIAL SUCH AS STONE OR RIP-RAP HAS BEEN INSTALLED;(C)

A MINIMUM OF 85% VEGETATED GROWTH HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED;(B)

BASE COURSE GRAVELS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED IN AREAS TO BE PAVED;(A)

AN AREA SHALL BE CONSIDERED STABLE IF ONE OF THE FOLLOWING HAS OCCURRED:2.4.

SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGES CONSTRUCTION.

EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT AND SECTION 645 OF THE NHDOT 2.3.

SEDIMENTATION BEYOND PROJECT LIMITS THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT DURATION.

EROSION, SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES AND INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL BE CLEANED, REPLACED AND AUGMENTED AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT 2.2.

INSTALLED AS SHOWN IN THE BMP MANUAL AND AS DIRECTED BY THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PREPARER.

PERIMETER CONTROLS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO EARTH DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. PERIMETER CONTROLS AND STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITS SHALL BE 2.1.

STANDARD EROSION CONTROL SEQUENCING APPLICABLE TO ALL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS:2.

LOSS UNTIL PERMANENT VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED.

SOIL TACKIFIERS MAY BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND REAPPLIED AS NECESSARY TO MINIMIZE SOIL AND MULCH 9.4.

AND PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 15, OF ANY GIVEN YEAR, IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION PRIOR TO THE END OF THE GROWING SEASON.

EROSION CONTROL SEED MIX SHALL BE SOWN IN ALL INACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AREAS THAT WILL NOT BE PERMANENTLY SEEDED WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF DISTURBANCE 9.3.

2012 CGP. (SEE TABLE 1 FOR GUIDANCE ON THE SELECTION OF TEMPORARY SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES.)

IN ALL AREAS, TEMPORARY SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES SHALL BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTS (SECTION 2.2) OF THE 9.2.

WITHIN THREE DAYS OF THE LAST ACTIVITY IN AN AREA, ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS, WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE COMPLETE, SHALL BE STABILIZED. 9.1.

SOIL STABILIZATION: 9.

LINE.

SLOPES. THE PERIMETER CONTROLS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE FILL SLOPE TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR FILL SLOPE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS IN THE DITCH

CHANNEL PROTECTION MEASURES SHALL BE SUPPLEMENTED WITH PERIMETER CONTROL MEASURES WHEN THE DITCH LINES OCCUR AT THE BOTTOM OF LONG FILL 11.9.

PLAN, DEVELOPED BY A QUALIFIED ENGINEER OR A CPESC SPECIALIST, IS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT.

THE AREA OF EXPOSED SOIL SHALL BE LIMITED TO ONE ACRE, OR THAT WHICH CAN BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF EACH DAY UNLESS A WINTER CONSTRUCTION

WINTER EXCAVATION AND EARTHWORK ACTIVITIES NEED TO BE LIMITED IN EXTENT AND DURATION, TO MINIMIZE POTENTIAL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION IMPACTS. 11.8.

PERMANENT DITCHES SHALL BE DIRECTED TO DRAIN TO SEDIMENT BASINS OR STORM WATER COLLECTION AREAS.

TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT DITCHES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED, STABILIZED AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNER THAT WILL MINIMIZE SCOUR. TEMPORARY AND 11.7.

PLACE TEMPORARY STONE INLET PROTECTION OVER INLETS IN AREAS OF SOIL DISTURBANCE THAT ARE SUBJECT TO SEDIMENT CONTAMINATION.

CATCH BASINS: CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO ENSURE THAT SEDIMENTS DO NOT ENTER ANY EXISTING CATCH BASINS DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL 11.6.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FOR ONE YEAR AFTER PROJECT COMPLETION.

VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED PERMANENTLY STABILIZED UNTIL VEGETATIVE GROWTH COVERS AT LEAST 85% OF THE DISTURBED AREA.

PERMANENT STABILIZATION MEASURES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO STABILIZE AREAS. 11.5.

STABILIZATION OF THE CONTRIBUTING DISTURBED AREA.

THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD UTILIZE STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING A STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM PRIOR TO THE PERMANENT 11.4.

ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDANCE MEMO FROM THE NHDES CONTAINED WITHIN THE CONTRACT PROPOSAL AND THE EPA CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT.

AFTER ANY STORM EVENT GREATER THAN 0.25 IN. OF RAIN PER 24-HOUR PERIOD. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WILL ALSO BE INSPECTED IN

EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE INSPECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 645 OF NHDOT SPECIFICATIONS, WEEKLY AND WITHIN 24 HOURS 11.3.

MEASURES (TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEED MIX AND MULCH, SOIL BINDER) OR COVERED WITH ANCHORED TARPS.

ALL STOCKPILES SHALL BE CONTAINED WITH TEMPORARY PERIMETER CONTROLS. INACTIVE SOIL STOCKPILES SHOULD BE PROTECTED WITH SOIL STABILIZATION 11.2.

TACKIFIERS, AS APPROVED BY THE NHDES.

USE MECHANICAL SWEEPERS ON PAVED SURFACES WHERE NECESSARY TO PREVENT DUST BUILDUP. APPLY WATER, OR OTHER DUST INHIBITING AGENTS OR

USE TEMPORARY MULCHING, PERMANENT MULCHING, TEMPORARY VEGETATIVE COVER, AND PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER TO REDUCE THE NEED FOR DUST CONTROL. 11.1.

ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL GENERAL PRACTICES:11.

EROSION, POLLUTION, AND TURBIDITY PRECAUTIONS.

THE CONTRACTOR IS DIRECTED TO REVIEW AND COMPLY WITH SECTION 107.1 OF THE CONTRACT AS IT REFERS TO SPILLAGE, AND ALSO WITH REGARDS TO 1.6.

)HTTP://DES.NH.GOV/ORGANIZATION/COMMISSIONER/LEGAL/RULES/INDEX.HTM(

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH RSA 485-A:17, AND ALL, PUBLISHED NHDES ALTERATION OF TERRAIN ENV-WQ 1500 REQUIREMENTS 1.5.

OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (NHDES).

MANUAL, VOLUME 3, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS DURING CONSTRUCTION (DECEMBER 2008) (BMP MANUAL) AVAILABLE FROM THE NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT

ALL STORM WATER, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEW HAMPSHIRE STORMWATER 1.4.

THE SPECIAL ATTENTION ITEMS INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.

THE CONTRACTOR'S ATTENTION IS DIRECTED TO THE NHDES WETLAND PERMIT, THE US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT, WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION AND 1.3.

GENERAL PERMIT (CGP).

AS ADMINISTERED BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA). THIS PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO REQUIREMENTS IN THE MOST RECENT CONSTRUCTION

THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE US EPA'S NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) STORM WATER CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT 1.2.

REGULATIONS.

THESE GUIDELINES DO NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR FROM COMPLIANCE WITH ANY CONTRACT PROVISIONS, OR APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL 1.1.

ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS:1.

SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT FROM AREAS OF UNSTABILIZED EARTH DISTURBING ACTIVITIES.

TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS OR TRAPS SHALL BE PLACED AND STABILIZED AT LOCATIONS WHERE CONCENTRATED FLOW (CHANNELS AND PIPES) DISCHARGE TO THE 10.3.

CONSTRUCT AND STABILIZE DEWATERING INFILTRATION BASINS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION THAT MAY REQUIRE DEWATERING.10.2.

STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM A 10-YEAR 24 HOUR STORM EVENT. ON-SITE RETENTION OF THE 10-YEAR 24-HOUR EVENT IS NOT REQUIRED.

TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS USED TO TREAT STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM AREAS GREATER THAN 5-ACRES OF DISTURBANCE SHALL BE SIZED TO ALSO CONTROL

24-HOUR STORM EVENT FOR ANY AREA OF DISTURBANCE OR 3,600 CUBIC FEET OF STORMWATER RUNOFF PER ACRE OF DISTURBANCE, WHICHEVER IS GREATER.

TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS (CGP-SECTION 2.1.3.2) OR SEDIMENT TRAPS (ENV-WQ 1506.10) SHALL BE SIZED TO RETAIN, ON SITE, THE VOLUME OF A 2-YEAR 10.1.

RETAIN SEDIMENT ON-SITE AND CONTROL DEWATERING PRACTICES:10.

REVISION DATE

12-21-2015


10430

DGN

10430erostr.dgn



124

WETLAND IMPACT PLANS

96

INC.

ARTS AND CRAFTS,

MEREDITH/LACONIA

SCALE IN FEET

20 0 4020

GRIDS

EE

WE

TL

AN

D I

MP

AC

T

PL

AN 02

MA

TC

HLI

NE

ST

A 246

+35.00


SH

EE

T

CH

EC

KE

D

AS

BUI

LT

DE

TAI

LS

DA

TE

DA

TE

DA

TE

DA

TE

NU

MB

ER

DA

TE

ST

ATI

ON

ST

ATI

ON

DE

SC

RI

PTI

ON

RE

VI

SI

ON

S

AF

TE

R

PR

OP

OS

AL

10430

DGN

10430wetplans


SD

R

PR

OC

ES

SE

D

NE

W

DE

SI

GN


5 12

WETLAND IMPACT PLAN 01

BE

P

EW

M

2/2

01

7

2/2

01

7

M cFarlandJohnson

241+00

242+00

243+00

244+00

245+00

246+00

+50

+50

+50

+50

+50

+50

#WETLAND DESIGNATION NUMBER

MITIGATION

# WETLAND IMPACT LOCATION

WETLAND MITIGATION AREA#

LEGEND

WETLAND IMPACT

TYPE OF

TEMPORARY IMPACTS

(PERMANENT NON-WETLAND)

NEW HAMPSHIRE WETLANDS BUREAU

(PERMANENT WETLAND)

ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS

NEW HAMPSHIRE WETLANDS BUREAU &

HATCHING

SHADING/

A

B

C

R4SB3J

1

3

2

BANK

BANK

L2US3G

4

MATCH EXISTING CONTOURS.

AT THE EXISTING ELEVATIONS, PROPOSED CONTOURS WILL

1. AS PROJECT IS RECONSTRUCTING PAVEMENT AND SIDEWALKS

NOTE:

1

BANK

BANK

R4SB3J

NUMBER

WETLANDWETLAND

CLASS-

IFICATION

A

D

B

C

LOCATION

SF

30

LF SF LF SF LF

(NON-WETLAND)

N.H.W.B.

(WETLAND)

A.C.O.E.

N.H.W.B. &TEMPORARY

PERMANENT

AREA IMPACTS

WETLAND IMPACT SUMMARY

132

198

E

L2US3G 88

PERMANENT IMPACTS: 360 SF

TEMPORARY IMPACTS: 203 SF

TOTAL IMPACTS: 563 SF

TOTAL 132228 203

F

G

DE

F

G

R4SB3J1

18

49

48

2

3

4

20

18

20

6

7

6

5

242038

BANK

BANK

3

2

II

I.S.

II

I.S.

EXIST. R.

O.

W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.

O.

W.

EXIST. R.

O.

W

EXIST. R.

O.

W

EXIST. R.

O.

W

EXIST. R.

O.

WEXI

ST. R.O.

W.

EXIST.

R.O.

W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

101

& NANCY J.

DAVID E., JR.

LARRABEE,

97

HOLDINGS, INC.

HOSPITALITY

HAMPSHIRE

102

HOLDINGS, INC.

HOSPITALITY

HAMPSHIRE

104

1999 REVOCABLE TRUST

ALEXANDER L. RAY

107

ANDREW C.

LEONE,

105

LLC

PARTNERS,

MARDIS

98

OF 1992

REVOCABLE TRUST

DOUGLAS P. HILL

ANDREW C.

LEONE,

gl

g

gl

gl

glgl

gl

glgl

gl

lp gl

gl

gl

fp

ip

an

lp

lp

ip

di

pb

an

an

an

posts

fpfc

fc

hyd

an

m hs

cb

di

cb

wg

m hs

cb

posts

mb

m h

s

m hs

cb

glgl

gl

gl

gl

glglgl

gl

gl

wg

gl

lp

lp

cb

cb

m hs

lp

ip

an

h

s

an

wg

w

so

OP

postpost

post

post

post

ip

rcp

12"

rcp

24"

50a

4

ver 4

4

12014

nhec

cmp

8"

6

ver 2

92.3

120

nhec

5a

15"

36"rcp

36"rcp

rcp

12"

pvc

4"

spp

8"

1• story

strea

m

post & rail

net

3-1

4

31

12014

nhec

cmp

psp

15"

cmp

15"

wood

21

12014

nhec

2s

4

net

3

4

3

12014

nhe

15A

CONSTRUCTION À

U.S. ROUTE 3

LINE

SLOPE

CONSTRUCTIONBEGIN

STA 241+25.00OAK

STREET

US ROUTE 3

LAKE WINNIPESAUKEE

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

ISLAND

LANDSCAPED

ISLAND

LANDSCAPED

ISLAND

LANDSCAPED

BOARDWALK

DO NOT DISTURB EXISTING

ITEM 503.201 - COFFERDAM

L

EASEMENT

DRAINAGE

jb

m

h

s

505

505

505

505

505

505

510

510

510

510

515

515

515

51

5

520

520

525

525

525

525

525

530

530

530

530

530

535

535

540

545

550

96

INC.

ARTS AND CRAFTS,

MEREDITH/LACONIA

SCALE IN FEET

20 0 4020

GRIDS

EE

ER

OSI

ON

CO

NT

RO

L

PL

AN 02

MA

TC

HLI

NE

ST

A 246

+35.00


SH

EE

T

CH

EC

KE

D

AS

BUI

LT

DE

TAI

LS

DA

TE

DA

TE

DA

TE

DA

TE

NU

MB

ER

DA

TE

ST

ATI

ON

ST

ATI

ON

DE

SC

RI

PTI

ON

RE

VI

SI

ON

S

AF

TE

R

PR

OP

OS

AL

10430

DGN

10430wetplans


SD

R

PR

OC

ES

SE

D

NE

W

DE

SI

GN


6 12

EROSION CONTROL PLAN 01

BE

P

EW

M

2/2

01

7

2/2

01

7

M cFarlandJohnson

241+00

242+00

243+00

244+00

245+00

246+00

+50

+50

+50

+50

+50

+50

243

+67.31

PT

LINING OPERATIONS

CULVERTS DURING SLIP

ALTERNATE BETWEEN 36"

CLEAN WATER BYPASS TO

= CLEAN WATER PROTECTION

= NATURAL BUFFER / PERIMETER CONTROL

= PERIMETER CONTROL

LEGEND

MATCH EXISTING CONTOURS.

AT THE EXISTING ELEVATIONS, PROPOSED CONTOURS WILL

1. AS PROJECT IS RECONSTRUCTING PAVEMENT AND SIDEWALKS

NOTE:

BOUNDARIES.

EXCEED THE COFFERDAM

IMPACT AREAS SHALL NOT

COFFERDAM FOR CLARITY.

PC IS OFFSET FROM

II

I.S.

II

I.S.

EXIST. R.

O.

W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.

O.

W.

EXIST. R.

O.

W

EXIST. R.

O.

W

EXIST. R.

O.

W

EXIST. R.

O.

WEXI

ST. R.O.

W.

EXIST.

R.O.

W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

101

& NANCY J.

DAVID E., JR.

LARRABEE,

97

HOLDINGS, INC.

HOSPITALITY

HAMPSHIRE

102

HOLDINGS, INC.

HOSPITALITY

HAMPSHIRE

104

1999 REVOCABLE TRUST

ALEXANDER L. RAY

103

MEREDITH

TOWN OF

107

ANDREW C.

LEONE,

105

LLC

PARTNERS,

MARDIS

98

OF 1992

REVOCABLE TRUST

DOUGLAS P. HILL

ANDREW C.

LEONE,

gl

g

gl

gl

glgl

gl

glgl

gl

lp gl

gl

gl

fp

ip

an

lp

lp

ip

di

pb

an

an

an

posts

fp

cbc

b

fc

fc

hyd

an

m hs

cb

cb

di

lp

cb

di

cb

wg

lp

lp

m hs

cb

posts

mb

m h

s

m hs

cb

glgl

gl

gl

gl

glglgl

gl

gl

wg

gl

lp

lp

cb

cb

m hs

lp

ip

an

h

s

an

wg

w

so

cb

OP

postpost

post

post

post

ip

rcp

12"

rcp

24"

50a

4

ver 4

4

12014

nhec

cmp

8"

6

ver 2

92.3

120

nhec

5a

15"

36"rcp

36"rcp

rcp

12"

pvc

4"

spp

8"

spp

8"

spp

8"

Fire Station

brick & wood

spp

8"spp

8"

1• story

strea

m

spp

8"

post & rail

net

3-1

4

31

12014

nhec

cmp

psp

15"

cmp

15"

wood

rw stone

2 story

21

12014

nhec

2s

4

net

3

4

3

12014

nhe

15A

vz2•

21

12014

nhe

5A

CONSTRUCTION À

U.S. ROUTE 3

LINE

SLOPE

CONSTRUCTIONBEGIN

STA 241+25.00OAK

STREET

US ROUTE 3

STATION

FIRE

MEREDITH

LAKE WINNIPESAUKEE

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

EASEMENT

DRAINAGE

jb

m

h

s

SE

E

ER

OSI

ON

CO

NT

RO

L

PL

AN 01

MA

TC

HLI

NE

ST

A 246

+25.00

247+00

248+00

249+00

250+00

+50

+50

+50

+50

+50



= PERIMETER CONTROL

LEGEND

II

I.S.

II

I.S.

II

I.S.

I.S.

I I.S.

I

I.S.

I

10' ACCESS EASE.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIS

T.

R.

O.

W.

EXI

ST.

R.

O.

W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

106

MEREDITH

TOWN OF

108

LLC

PROPERTIES,

ROBERT SCOTT

109

LLC

REALTY,

GASCO

117

HOLDINGS, INC.

HOSPITALITY

HAMPSHIRE

112

MARION

CHASE

111

JOHN F.

COOK,

107

ANDREW C.

LEONE,

mh cb

di

cb

cb

cb

cb

mh

cb

NU

LL

NU

LL

NU

LL

jb

gl gl

cb

w

ph

m hd

mh

s

cb

m h

s

m hs

m hs

w

wg

an

w

w

w

cb

w

m hs

gl

glgl

gl

m hs

mh

ph

lp

lp

gl

cb

gl

ip

ip

ip

cb

gl

NU

LL

NU

LL

92.4120nhec

pvc

12"

pvc

18"

pvc

18"

rcp

15"

92.5

120

nhec

pvc

6"

18"

rcp

15"

rcp

15"

pipe?

pvcp

6"

12"

12"

12"

pipe

6"

18"cpp

pcp

15"

926

120

nhec

water

bgr

psp

psp

psp

spp

?"

gci

psp

a

5/15

bell

92.1

120

nhec

CONSTRUCTION À

U.S. ROUTE 3

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

LA

KE

ST

RE

ET

US ROUTE 3

LAKE WINNIPESAUKEE

PARKING LOT

PONDING

POTENTIAL

ADDRESS EASEMENT

CONSTRUCTION

TEMPORARY

EASEMENT

SIDEWALK

EASEMENT

CONSTRUCTION

TEMPORARY

GRID

SCALE IN FEET

20 0 4020

SE

E

ER

OSI

ON

CO

NT

RO

L

PL

AN 03

MA

TC

HLI

NE

ST

A 250

+75.00


SH

EE

T

CH

EC

KE

D

AS

BUI

LT

DE

TAI

LS

DA

TE

DA

TE

DA

TE

DA

TE

NU

MB

ER

DA

TE

ST

ATI

ON

ST

ATI

ON

DE

SC

RI

PTI

ON

RE

VI

SI

ON

S

AF

TE

R

PR

OP

OS

AL

10430

DGN

10430wetplans


SD

R

PR

OC

ES

SE

D

NE

W

DE

SI

GN


7 12


BE

P

EW

M

2/2

01

7

2/2

01

7

M cFarlandJohnson

mh

md

251+00

252+00

253+00

+50

+50

253

+16.95

PC

US ROUTE 3 STA 253+16.95, RT 6.00' AHEAD

US ROUTE 3 STA 253+16.95 BACK =



= PERIMETER CONTROL

LEGEND

I.S.

I

I.S.

I

I.S.

I

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIS

T.

R.

O.

W.

EXIS

T.

R.

O.

W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

118

MEREDITH

TOWN OF

gl

gl

gl

gl

fp

gl gl

di

wg

wg

wg

di

gl

gl

gl

NU

LL

jb

gl

gl

gl

m hs

m hs

hyd

anan

an

cc

fp

fc

cb

m hs

m hs

m h

s

elect meter

gl

gl

m hs

gl

gl

gl

elect meter

m hs

md

LP

md

md

md

md

#4

pvc

12" pvc

12"

pvc

12"

8"

8" c

mp to

inletlake

metal bridge bgr

10.5'w conc box culv.

Bridge

#3

river

wood

1 story

cip

24" rcp

30" rc

p

3

11402

nhec

200/2

nynex

?

112.02

nhec

50-a

CONSTRUCTION À

U.S. ROUTE 3

CONSTRUCTION À

U.S. ROUTE 3

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

DO

VE

R S

TR

EE

T

US ROUTE 3

LAKE WINNIPESAUKEE

PARK

HESKY

EXISTING FENCE

DO NOT IMPACT

EASEMENT

CONSTRUCTION

TEMPORARY

EASEMENT

CONSTRUCTION

TEMPORARY

GRID

SCALE IN FEET

20 0 4020

SE

E

ER

OSI

ON

CO

NT

RO

L

PL

AN 04

MA

TC

HLI

NE

ST

A. 255

+75.00

SE

E

ER

OSI

ON

CO

NT

RO

L

PL

AN 02

MA

TC

HLI

NE

ST

A. 250

+75.00


SH

EE

T

CH

EC

KE

D

AS

BUI

LT

DE

TAI

LS

DA

TE

DA

TE

DA

TE

DA

TE

NU

MB

ER

DA

TE

ST

ATI

ON

ST

ATI

ON

DE

SC

RI

PTI

ON

RE

VI

SI

ON

S

AF

TE

R

PR

OP

OS

AL

10430

DGN

10430wetplans


SD

R

PR

OC

ES

SE

D

NE

W

DE

SI

GN


8 12


BE

P

EW

M

2/2

01

7

2/2

01

7

M cFarlandJohnson

124

147

HOLDINGS, INC

HOSPITALITY

HAMPSHIRE

cb

GRID

SCALE IN FEET

20 0 4020

SE

E

ER

OSI

ON

CO

NT

RO

L

PL

AN 03

MA

TC

HLI

NE

ST

A 255

+75.00

SE

E

ER

OSI

ON

CO

NT

RO

L

PL

AN 05

MA

TC

HLI

NE

ST

A 261

+50.00

SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN 06MATCHLINE STA 64+40.00


SH

EE

T

CH

EC

KE

D

AS

BUI

LT

DE

TAI

LS

DA

TE

DA

TE

DA

TE

DA

TE

NU

MB

ER

DA

TE

ST

ATI

ON

ST

ATI

ON

DE

SC

RI

PTI

ON

RE

VI

SI

ON

S

AF

TE

R

PR

OP

OS

AL

10430

DGN

10430wetplans


SD

R

PR

OC

ES

SE

D

NE

W

DE

SI

GN


9 12


BE

P

EW

M

2/2

01

7

2/2

01

7

M cFarlandJohnson

259

+23.46

PC

C

51

+00

52

+00

52

+70

63

+00

64

+00

+50

62

+70

NH ROUTE 25 STA 62+70.00

MAIN STREET STA 52+70.00 =

US ROUTE 3 STA 258+46.95 =



= PERIMETER CONTROL

LEGEND

I.S.

I

I.S.

I

I.S.

I

I.S.

I

I.S.

I I.S.

I

I.S.

I

I.S.

I

I.S.

I

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXI

ST.

R.

O.

W.

EXI

ST.

R.

O.

W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXI

ST.

R.

O.

W.

EXI

ST.

R.

O.

W.

LLC

PARTNERS,

BAY

MEREDITH

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXI

ST.

R.

O.

W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXI

ST.

R.

O.

W.

EXI

ST.

R.

O.

W.

150

SAVINGS BANK

MEREDITH VILLAGE

121

CORPORATION

MEREDITH BAY

125

TRUST

GRANTOR

NORMANDIN

LINDA D.

126

LLC

REALTY,

CIRQUE129

INC

THRIFTAMAT,

119

MEREDITH

TOWN OF

gl

gl

cb

cb

pb

pb

gl

wso

an

an

mh

w

hh

pb

hh

gl

pb

ft

ft

ft

jb

ip

gl

wg

cb

hyd

di

wg

cb

m hd

cc

di

hyd

wg

m h

s

m hs

pb

cb

wg

cb

w

ft

bnd

ft

wso

cb

cb

pb

pb

wsow

so

ft ft

ft

ft

ft

ft

fc

lp

gl

cb

post

post

h

yd

m hu

mh

s

an

ip

bnd

bnd

bnd

bnd

bnd

pvcp

12"

18" rcp

24" rcp

cmp

12"

rcp

18" or 15"

15" rcp

clay

15"

8" pvcp

rcp

15"

wood

2• story

wood

2• story

19

114

nhec

16.6

114

nhe

8" pvcp

15" rc

p

& asph sk

wood canopy

pit w/

mrm cooking

21

114

nhec

Real Estate

Luxury

Lakes Region

3a

3

104

1 story brick

24" rcp

30" rcp

24" rcp

1

11402

30/a

20

114

nhec

CONSTRUCTION À

U.S. ROUTE 3

CONSTRUCTION À

U.S. ROUTE 3

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

MAI

N

ST

RE

ET

US ROUTE 3

US ROUTE 3/NH ROUTE 25

LAKE WINNIPESAUKEE

CONSTRUCTION À

N.H. ROUTE 25

LIMIT OF WORK

STA 51+00.00

CONSTRUCTION À

MAIN STREET

LINE

SLOPE

WI

NNI

PE

SA

UK

EE

ST

RE

ET

N.

H.

RO

UT

E 25/

EASEMENT

SIDEWALK

EASEMENT

CONSTRUCTION

TEMPORARY

EASEMENT

CONSTRUCTION

TEMPORARY

EASEMENT

SIGN

EASEMENT

SIDEWALK

EASEMENT

SIDEWALK

cb

cb

GRID

SCALE IN FEET

20 0 4020

SE

E

ER

OSI

ON

CO

NT

RO

L

PL

AN 4

MA

TC

HLI

NE

ST

A 261

+50.00


SH

EE

T

CH

EC

KE

D

AS

BUI

LT

DE

TAI

LS

DA

TE

DA

TE

DA

TE

DA

TE

NU

MB

ER

DA

TE

ST

ATI

ON

ST

ATI

ON

DE

SC

RI

PTI

ON

RE

VI

SI

ON

S

AF

TE

R

PR

OP

OS

AL

10430

DGN

10430wetplans


SD

R

PR

OC

ES

SE

D

NE

W

DE

SI

GN


10 12


BE

P

EW

M

2/2

01

7

2/2

01

7

M cFarlandJohnson

263

+14.95

PC

C

265

+80.29

PT

I.S.

I

PR

OJ,

P-1744-

A

FL

OW

AG

E

EA

SE.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

133

MEREDITH

TOWN OF

131

MEREDITH

TOWN OF

EL

EA

NO

R

WE

SL

EY

&

LO

RD

n/f

132

TRUST

REALTY

FAMILY

LUDWICK

134

SHARON

PETER &

SPANOS,

135

MEREDITH

TOWN OF

136

LLC

ENTERPRISES,

L&S CAR WASH

137

MICHAEL

GOULD

n/f

##

OWNER

OWNER

141

FARMS INC

CUMBERLAND

n/f

an

an

cb

an

cb

cb

an

an

an

an

an

w

w

g

ip

cb

m h

s

cb

ip

cb

ip

m hs

w

g

s

4 sewer valves

cb

wso

h

yd

3 fts

cb

cb cb

post

PH

post

post

post

post

post

post

md

h

yd

m

h

s

lp

lp

wso

24" rcp

24" c

mp

pipe?

15" rcp

4" pvcp

18" cmp

12" cmp

15"

cmp

rcp

15"

rcp

15"

rcp

18"

spp

15"

18"

6"cap

18

114

a/nhec

net/5

513/3

17

114

nhec

net

2

513

1

vz 513

114/16

14a/nhec

15

nhec/114

1/net

512b/512

34/15/x

•513/wmp

spp

vz 513-1

161.1

114

nhec

14a

161

114

nhec

net

1

513a

111/111

84/nhec

net/wmp

512b/1

2000

24" rcp

CONSTRUCTION À

U.S. ROUTE 3

CONSTRUCTIONEND

STA 265+70.00PARKING LOT

US ROUTE 3/NH ROUTE 25

GRI

D

SCALE IN FEET

20 0 4020

SE

E

ER

OSI

ON

CO

NT

RO

L

PL

AN 0

4

MA

TC

HLI

NE

ST

A 6

4+4

0.0

0

SE

E

ER

OSI

ON

CO

NT

RO

L

PL

AN 0

7

MA

TC

HLI

NE

ST

A 6

9+5

0.0

0


SH

EE

T

CH

EC

KE

D

AS

BUI

LT

DE

TAI

LS

DA

TE

DA

TE

DA

TE

DA

TE

NU

MB

ER

DA

TE

ST

ATI

ON

ST

ATI

ON

DE

SC

RI

PTI

ON

RE

VI

SI

ON

S

AF

TE

R

PR

OP

OS

AL

10430

DGN

10430wetplans


SD

R

PR

OC

ES

SE

D

NE

W

DE

SI

GN


11 12


BE

P

EW

M

2/2

01

7

2/2

01

7

M cFarlandJohnson

65+00

66+00 67+00 68+00 69+00

+5

0

+5

0

+5

0

+5

0

+5

0

+5

0

PLEASANT STREET STA 90+00.00

NH ROUTE 25 STA 71+16.22 =



= PERIMETER CONTROL

LEGEND

II

I.S.I.S.

I

I.S.

I

I.S.

I

I.S.

I

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

149

MEREDITH

TOWN OF

152

?

OF NH]

[STATE

156

MEREDITH

TOWN OF

151

(DOT)

OF NH

STATE

153

SAVINGS BANK

MEREDITH VILLAGE

147

HOLDINGS, INC

HOSPITALITY

HAMPSHIRE

150

SAVINGS BANK

MEREDITH VILLAGE

mon

gl

wg

st

an

wmon

jb

jb

jb

jb

wso

w

mon

gl

lp

gl

di

wso

m h

s

wg

gl

gl

gl

gl

lp

gl

gl

hyd

w

mon

w

mon

w

mon

lp

m ht

hh

m h

s

di

cb

an

wso

lp

post

mdmdmdmd

md

md

md

md

mdm

dlp

bnd

22

114

nhec

2

104

box culvert

15" rcp

12" or

8" pvcp

no #s

net

15

100

•100b

net

13

net

2

100

rcp

15"

Seneca-Ladd Bldg.

wood

3 story MVSB

2 story brick

parking

asphalt

wood

story

pole

mtl lt

2•

psp6"

CONSTRUCTION À

N.H. ROUTE 25

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

LAKE WINNIPESAUKEE

PARK

SCENIC

WINNIPESAUKEE STREET

N.H. ROUTE 25/

EASEMENT

CONSTRUCTION

TEMPORARY

EASEMENT

SIDEWALK

EASEMENT

SIDEWALKEASEMENT

CONSTRUCTION

TEMPORARY

GRI

D

SCALE IN FEET

20 0 4020

SE

E

ER

OSI

ON

CO

NT

RO

L

PL

AN 0

6

MA

TC

HLI

NE

ST

A 6

9+5

0.0

0


SH

EE

T

CH

EC

KE

D

AS

BUI

LT

DE

TAI

LS

DA

TE

DA

TE

DA

TE

DA

TE

NU

MB

ER

DA

TE

ST

ATI

ON

ST

ATI

ON

DE

SC

RI

PTI

ON

RE

VI

SI

ON

S

AF

TE

R

PR

OP

OS

AL

10430

DGN

10430wetplans


SD

R

PR

OC

ES

SE

D

NE

W

DE

SI

GN


12 12


BE

P

EW

M

2/2

01

7

2/2

01

7

M cFarlandJohnson

70+00

71+0

0

72+0

0

73+0

0

74+0

0

74+5

0

74+5

0

+5

0

+50

+50

+50

+50

70

+0

9.9

7

PC

71+86.04

PT

90+00

91+00

91+90

91+90

90+51.56

PC

90

+94.63

PT

PLEASANT STREET STA 90+00.00

NH ROUTE 25 STA 71+16.22 =



= PERIMETER CONTROL

LEGEND

I.S.

I

I.S.

I

I.S.

I

I.S.

I

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.O.W.

EXIST. R.

O.

W.

EXIST.

R.O.

W.

EXIST.

R.O.

W.

157

MEREDITH

TOWN OF

OWNER

OWNER

155

TRUST

REALTY

SAVINGS BANK

VILLAGE

MEREDITH

171

CENTER

SHOPPING

CROSSPOINT

MEREDITH

170

MICHELLE T.

MICHAEL J. &

MERRILL,

169

CHERYL F.

HOOK,

173

LLC

CROSS REALTY,

172

BARBARA

JAMES N. &

GOREN,

168

REVOCABLE TRUST

HARRY B. LAMB

REVOCABLE TRUST

NANCY A. LAMB

153

SAVINGS BANK

MEREDITH VILLAGE

156

MEREDITH

TOWN OF

mon

an

wg

m

h

s

m

h

s

hh

hy

d

cb

wg

anwg

wg

ft

ft

wmon

pb

lp

m ht

vp

wmon

wso

an

w

cb

an

wmon

cb

mon

di

post

bnd

ip

an

ip

w

so

post

gl

wso

gl

ip

w

so

lp

w

g

w

g

wg

lp

post

post

post

post

NULL

NULL

lp

an

cb

ip

ip

ip

grn bnd

15" pvcp

12" rcp

15" pep

12" rcp

422

16

100

•100w

150

pvcp

wood

story

2

wood r

ail

wood

story

2

18

23

11502

nhec

40a

net

422

net

150/421

net

1

100w

12" rc

p

21

11502

nhec

15"

Grill

Deli &

Lakeside

15" pvc

8"spp

3A

24

11502

nhe

19bell

20

11502

nhec

19-1

11502

nhec

19

11502

nhec

20-1

11502

nhec

CONSTRUCTION À

N.H. ROUTE 25

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

LINE

SLOPE

LIMIT OF WORK

STA 91+65.00

CONSTRUCTIONEND

STA 72+20.00

PLEASANT STREET

LAKE WINNIPESAUKEE

PARK

SCENIC

CONSTRUCTION À

PLEASANT STREET

WI

NNIPES

AU

KEE STREET

N.

H. R

OUTE 25/

EASEMENT

SIDEWALK

standard dredge & fill application - new hampshire · standard dredge & fill application ....

Documents