standardizing electrophoresis conditions: how to … · migration of dna during electrophoresis ......
TRANSCRIPT
Standardizing electrophoresis
conditions: How to eliminate a major
source of error in the comet assay
Gunnar Brunborg
Norwegian Institute of Public Health,
Department of Chemicals and radiation,
Oslo, Norway
ICAW 2015 Antwerp Sept 2015
There is still too much variation in
comet assay results
Our ambition is to contribute to reducing such
variations
Approach in this project: Analysis of critical
parameters, and revision of protocols if
needed.
ICAW 2015 Antwerp Sept 2015
The comet assay: biology, chemistry
and physics
• The degree of DNA damage formed in a cell
depends on biology and chemistry.
• The conversion of this DNA damage into
comet tails is determined by the rate of
migration of DNA during electrophoresis
• Electrophoresis is first of all a physical
process
ICAW 2015 Antwerp Sept 2015
Analysing the physics of comet tail
formation through electrophoresis
In principle,
• Total DNA-migration = Tail%DNA
= f(dragging forces; retarding forces)
Here,
• Dragging forces = Constant x U[V/cm] x time
• Retarding forces = Constant x Viscosity
(temperature; matrix (agarose
concentration))
ICAW 2015 Antwerp Sept 2015
The conditions known to affect DNA
migrations
1. Electric potential (Voltage gradient, V/cm)
2. Time
3. The matrix (agarose concentration affects
the pore size)
4. Temperature
5. Electrophoresis solution (if the pH is low)
ICAW 2015 Antwerp Sept 2015
Some points to note
• What is the significance of the electric current?
– Answer: None (but it depends on the volume of
the liquid).
• What is the inter-relationship between the applied
voltage and the current?
– Answer: It’s a constant (= related to the electric
conductance of the liquid in the tank)
• How can you alter the current?
– By adding more liquid
– By changing the conductance of the liquid
– By using another tank, with different dimensions
ICAW 2015 Antwerp Sept 2015
The current is determined by the volume of the
electrophoresis liquid (the voltage is kept constant)
ICAW 2015 Antwerp Sept 2015
The current is determined by the voltage (when the volume
is kept constant)
• The voltage has to be
above a certain level
(i.e. the potential of
the electrode, which
for platinum is close to
2 volts). Above 2 V,
the current increases
almost linearly
ICAW 2015 Antwerp Sept 2015
96 minigel format (4 microliter per gel)
Gutzkow KB,
Langleite TM, Meier
S, Graupner A, Collins
AR, Brunborg G.
High-throughput
comet assay using 96
minigels.
Mutagenesis, May
2013; 28(3):333-40
ICAW 2015 Antwerp Sept 2015
0 Gy
10 Gy
with
circu
latio
n
with
out circu
latio
n
0
20
40
60
80
% T
ail
DN
A inte
nsity
We reported substantial variations between technical
replicates in neighbouring gels processed in the same
electrophoresis (Gutzkow et al., Mutagenesis 2013).
The 96 minigel format confronted us with a
potential problem in comet electrophoresis
ICAW 2015 Antwerp Sept 2015
Our understanding of the principles of
electrophoresis should allow us to
explain the cause of these variations
• Hypothesis: There are larger variations in
local voltage without than with circulation of
the electrophoresis solution
ICAW 2015 Antwerp Sept 2015
Local voltage measured using a
multi-electrode
Electrophoresis tank with platform, with unit containing 19 thin
platinum electrodes. They are covered with plastic so that only the
lower 1 mm part is exposed to the solution. Their distance to the
platform surface may be adjusted.
V
Pt plastic
ICAW 2015 Antwerp Sept 2015
Voltages measured in all electrodes,
every 10 seconds
• A device (Agilent 34972A, with the
34901A Multiplexer) scans all
electrodes during 1 second, at a
preset interval (every 10 seconds).
• Accurate determinations of time-
dependent local voltages are thus
made.
• One channel is used to record the
temperature in the solution.
ICAW 2015 Antwerp Sept 2015
Circulation rate 3 Measurements during 25 minutes.
Left axis: Voltage, Right axis: Temp (deg)
-10,0
-8,0
-6,0
-4,0
-2,0
0,0
2,0
4,0
6,0
8,0
10,0
0,0
1,0
2,0
3,0
4,0
5,0
6,0
7,0
8,0
9,0
10,0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
102 (VDC)103 (VDC)104 (VDC)105 (VDC)106 (VDC)107 (VDC)108 (VDC)109 (VDC)110 (VDC)111 (VDC)112 (VDC)113 (VDC)114 (VDC)115 (VDC)116 (VDC)117 (VDC)118 (VDC)119 (VDC)
ICAW 2015 Antwerp Sept 2015
Temperature
0,0
2,0
4,0
6,0
8,0
10,0
12,0
0,0
1,0
2,0
3,0
4,0
5,0
6,0
7,0
8,0
9,0
10,0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
102 (VDC)103 (VDC)104 (VDC)105 (VDC)106 (VDC)107 (VDC)108 (VDC)109 (VDC)110 (VDC)111 (VDC)112 (VDC)113 (VDC)114 (VDC)115 (VDC)116 (VDC)117 (VDC)118 (VDC)119 (VDC)
No Circulation Measurements for 25 minutes.
Left axis: Voltage, Right axis: Temp (deg)
ICAW 2015 Antwerp Sept 2015
Yes indeed, when you transform the
measurements into local voltage (V/cm) and its
variation with time!
No circulation, uncorrected
measurements
With circulation rate 3 uncorrected measurements
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,8
2
0 50 100 150
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
ICAW 2015 Antwerp Sept 2015
Results are corrected to account for varying
spacing of the electrodes
No circulation
corrected measurements
With circulation rate 3
corrected measurements
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,8
2
0 50 100 1500
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
0 50 100 150ICAW 2015 Antwerp Sept 2015
Calculations
• Voltage recordings used to calculate time-
integrated «dragging force»
– (Voltage per cm x minutes)
• At each electrode location.
ICAW 2015 Antwerp Sept 2015
Expected comet tail
(=time-integrated electric potential) With circulation rate 3
Mean: 4.96
CV (%) = 0.25
No circulation
Mean: 5.01
CV (%) = 12.21
0,00
1,00
2,00
3,00
4,00
5,00
6,00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Corrected electrode voltages
0,00
1,00
2,00
3,00
4,00
5,00
6,00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Corrected electrode voltages
ICAW 2015 Antwerp Sept 2015
Is there an optimal rate of
circulation?
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 20 40 60
Uncorrected
Corrected
Circulation: ml per minute
0,00
1,00
2,00
3,00
4,00
5,00
6,00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Uncorrected
Corrected
Mean time-integrated
electric potential
CV (%) time-integrated
electric potential
ICAW 2015 Antwerp Sept 2015
Comet assay can be
easy and cheap • Refrigerator
• External pump
• Circulation of electrophoresis
solution through heat
exchanger in ice/water
Large gels (e.g. on glass slides) are most likely
subjected to the same error as small ones!
1 cm
3 cm
• Do you score comets over all the
surface of a large gel (often 10,000
comets), in a systematic way? – If the answer is yes, then your only problem is
probably that your comet tails within one
sample vary more than necessary
– If the anser is no, then you introduce significant
errors
– In both cases, you may not be aware of the
problem!
• Do you use small gels (2 – 10 microliter
of agarose, 100 – 400 comets)? – You probably score comets over the whole
surface, and you often score all of them
– You probably observe rather large variations
between parallell samples (technical
replicates).
A comet assay gel may cover
a substantial portion of a glass
slide (2.5 x 7.5 cm).
The gel surface hence spans
several of the electrode
positions for which we have
measured large voltage
variations
ICAW 2015 Antwerp Sept 2015
In addition to possible experimental
variations in your cell work…
• Are you prepared for errors introduced in
your results, by the electrophoresis alone,
of probably
+/- 25%
ICAW 2015 Antwerp Sept 2015