standards issues related to moving content off the page

51
Standards issues related to moving content off the page Problems of distinguishing this thing from that Todd Carpenter, Executive Director, NISO Goportis Conference on Non-Textual Information March 18, 2013 Monday, March 18, 13

Upload: national-information-standards-organization-niso

Post on 02-Nov-2014

1.266 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

"Standards issues related to moving content off the page - Problems of distinguishing this thing from that" presentation during GOPORTIS13 conference in Hanover, Germany

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Standards issues related to moving content

off the page

Problems of distinguishing this thing from that

Todd Carpenter, Executive Director, NISOGoportis Conference on Non-Textual Information

March 18, 2013

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 2: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

• A US-baed non-profit industry trade association accredited by ANSI with 150+ members

• Mission of developing and maintaining technical standards related to information, documentation, discovery and distribution of published materials and media

• Volunteer driven organization: 400+ spread out across the world

• Represent US interests to ISO TC 46 & subcommitteesAlso serve as Secretariat for ISO TC46/SC9 - Identification & Description

• Responsible for standards like ISSN, DOI, Dublin Core metadata, DAISY digital talking books, OpenURL, MARC records format, and ISBN

About

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 4: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Key Concepts in Standardization

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 5: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

The thing being identified

The Referent

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 6: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

The string identifying the referent

The Identifier

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 7: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

The data that describes the referent

The Metadata

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 8: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

• Identifiers can be but are not necessarily names (often better if they aren’t)

• IDs can be but need not be human-readable. They also may or may not be human understandable.

• Not every attribute need be described

An ID & its metadata

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 9: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Functional GranularityMonday, March 18, 13

Page 10: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Functional GranularityMonday, March 18, 13

Page 11: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Functional GranularityMonday, March 18, 13

Page 12: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Functional GranularityMonday, March 18, 13

Page 13: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Functional GranularityMonday, March 18, 13

Page 14: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Functional GranularityMonday, March 18, 13

Page 15: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Functional GranularityMonday, March 18, 13

Page 16: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

You identify and describe an item at the level

at which it makes sense for your business needs

to identify that item

Functional Granularity

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 17: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

A lesson in functional granularity

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 18: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Managing metadata well is expensive

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 19: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Managing metadata poorly is more

expensive(in ways you can’t measure)

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 20: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR)

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 21: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

<indecs> model

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 22: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

September  6,  2012 GOPOERTIS  Non-­‐textual  informa?on  -­‐  Carpenter

<indecs>  descrip?on  model

16

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 23: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Making the

Theoretical Practical

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 24: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Online Journal Article Supplemental Materials

NISO/NFAIS Recommended Practice

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 25: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Supplemental Materials are nothing new

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 26: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

September  6,  2012 GOPOERTIS  Non-­‐textual  informa?on  -­‐  Carpenter

Truly  nothing  new,  indeed

• An  earlier  example  of  supplemental  materials  from  the  Royal  Society  of  Chemistry

• A  template  for  a  physical  device  was  included  as  supplemental  material  1843.  

• Plates  1-­‐6  of  that  ar?cle  were  not  paginated;  the  reader  would  cut  out  the  template  on  each  page,  and  connect  them  to  create  a  working  light  polariza?on  device

20

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 27: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

How pressing is this problem?

This image is courtesy of Ken Beauchamp, American Society for Clinical Investigation

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 28: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Goal is to focus on the publication structures necessary for communicating supplemental

materials as part of the publications process

NOT addressing all data questions

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 29: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

The core questions:What is critical to understanding?

What is supplemental to understanding?What is ancillary to understanding?

The form of the content, i.e., text, video, audio, data, applications, is NOT

the key to whether something is supplemental

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 30: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Supplemental Material that is essential for the full understanding of the work by the general scientist or reader in the journal’s discipline, but is placed outside the article for technical, business, or logistical reasons.

Integral Content

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 31: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Supplemental Material that provides additional, relevant, and useful expansion of the article in the form of text, tables, figures, multimedia, or data, and that may aid any reader to achieve work through added detail and context. Additional Content will expand the reader’s understanding of the subject area, but is not essential to the understanding of the article.

Additional Content

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 32: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Is a separate entity and is referenced within the text in similar fashion to other cited references.

Related Content

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 33: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Types of Supplemental Materials

Importance (function) Curated by

Integral content

Pseudo supplemental – essential but treated as if it were supplemental

Additional content

Truly supplemental – relevant and useful but optional

Publisher

• Multimedia • Chemical structures • Crystallographic structures • Datasets (smaller) • Computer algorithms

Not integrated into the version of record

• Multimedia • Chemical structures • Crystallographic structures • Datasets (smaller) • Computer algorithms

• Appendices • Materials and methods • Experimental procedures • Extended bibliography

Institutional repository or Official data center

Genetic sequences, Protein structures, Crystallographic structures, Datasets (large), etc.

Related content Individual Ephemeral – not appropriate for hosting supplemental materials

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 34: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Determining whether Supplemental Material

is Integral, Additional or Relatedis the purview of the Journal.

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 35: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Selecting Content

Editing Content

Managing & Hosting

Assuring Discoverability

Referencing Materials

Maintaining Links

Providing Context

Preserving Material

Rights Management

Business Practice - Themes

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 36: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Technical Practice - Themes

Metadata Schema•Descriptive Metadata•Physical Metadata•Packaging/Manifest

Identifiers & Linking

Grouping Objects

Challenges• Granularity• Recurrence• Relationships• Heterogeneity• Hierarchy

Overall Issues• Perceived importance• Costs• Business models

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 37: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Who came together to address this?

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 39: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Managing Data

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 40: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 41: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 42: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

One Ring to Rule Them All?

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 43: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

0000-0002-8320-0491

3188-4093-2114-1074

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 44: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Linking various media or confusing the situation?

ISWC

ISRC ISTC

ISBN

ISSN

CSI ISMN

ISAN

ISAN

IPI

IPI

ISNI

VIAF IPDA

DOI �

DOI

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 45: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

September  6,  2012 GOPOERTIS  Non-­‐textual  informa?on  -­‐  Carpenter

Issues  for  Iden?fica?on  of  Data

• At  what  level  to  assign  an  iden?fier  (granularity)?• What  metadata  to  associate  with  the  ID?• Assign  to  data  or  landing  page?• How  to  relate  transforma?ons?• Associated  metadata  to  transforma?ons?• Extensible  ontology  of  object  types  &  transforms?

• Scien?fic  equivalence  versus  data  equivalence?

39

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 46: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

LSST Telescope ProjectMonday, March 18, 13

Page 47: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Excel to XML, easy enough

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 48: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

How are these different?How different are these?

Before After

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 49: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Digital PreservationMonday, March 18, 13

Page 50: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Where are we headed• Team including: RPI, U. Illinois-Urbana-

Champaign, U North Carolina, NASA, NISO

• Goal create a conceptual model to describe data creation, transformation & entity relationships

• Preparing grant proposal (hopefully spring 2013)

• Potential funding partners: Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, NSF, IMLS

• Round 1 - Two day symposium in 3-4 Q 2013

• Round 2 - Model development project in 2014-15

Monday, March 18, 13

Page 51: Standards issues related to moving content  off the page

Thank you!

Todd Carpenter, Executive [email protected]

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)3600 Clipper Mill Road, Suite 302

Baltimore, MD 21211 USA+1 (301) 654-2512

www.niso.org

Monday, March 18, 13