star christine nattrass (star collaboration), yale university dnp, nashville, 28 october 2006 1 1...

15
1 STAR Christine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University Christine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006 DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006 Two particle azimuthal correlations Two particle azimuthal correlations in Cu+Cu collisions at in Cu+Cu collisions at s s NN NN = 200 GeV = 200 GeV at RHIC at RHIC Christine Nattrass (STAR collaboration) Christine Nattrass (STAR collaboration) Yale University Yale University

Upload: abner-burns

Post on 21-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: STAR Christine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006 1 1 Two particle azimuthal correlations in Cu+Cu collisions

1STAR

Christine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale UniversityChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale UniversityDNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006

Two particle azimuthal correlations in Two particle azimuthal correlations in Cu+Cu collisions at Cu+Cu collisions at ssNNNN = 200 GeV at = 200 GeV at

RHICRHICChristine Nattrass (STAR collaboration)Christine Nattrass (STAR collaboration)

Yale UniversityYale University

Page 2: STAR Christine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006 1 1 Two particle azimuthal correlations in Cu+Cu collisions

STARChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale UniversityChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University

DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006DNP, Nashville, 28 October 200622

OutlineOutline

Motivation

Analysis technique

Results

Conclusions

Page 3: STAR Christine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006 1 1 Two particle azimuthal correlations in Cu+Cu collisions

STARChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale UniversityChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University

DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006DNP, Nashville, 28 October 200633

Motivation – Motivation – Jets as a probe of the Jets as a probe of the

mediummediumHard parton scattering => back-to-back jets

Good probes of medium produced at RHIC

High multiplicity in A+A events

Individual jets cannot be identified

Jets have been studied using azimuthal correlations

STAR, PRL 91 (2003) 072304

Page 4: STAR Christine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006 1 1 Two particle azimuthal correlations in Cu+Cu collisions

STARChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale UniversityChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University

DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006DNP, Nashville, 28 October 200644

Motivation –Motivation –particle identification in jetsparticle identification in jets

Particle identification:

Particle/antiparticle differences

Quark vs gluon jets

Meson/baryon differences

Coalescence/ recombination mechanisms

Observed in particle ratiosTestable with identified particle correlations?

PartonPartonPartonParton

HadronsHadrons

HadronsHadronsKK00

SS

KK00SS

K0S

K0S

Page 5: STAR Christine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006 1 1 Two particle azimuthal correlations in Cu+Cu collisions

STARChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale UniversityChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University

DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006DNP, Nashville, 28 October 200655

Motivation -Motivation -Long-range Long-range

pseudorapidity pseudorapidity correlationscorrelations

Long-range pseudorapidity () correlations observed by STAR in Au+Au

Near side jet peak sits on plateau (Ridge)

Significant contribution to the near-side yield

Look for particle, system size dependencies which might reveal production mechanism

Page 6: STAR Christine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006 1 1 Two particle azimuthal correlations in Cu+Cu collisions

STARChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale UniversityChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University

DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006DNP, Nashville, 28 October 200666

Identification of Identification of strange particlesstrange particles

V0 identification

Reconstruction decay vertices

Identification out to high pT

Pure samples

V0s used for triggers

Vo

KK00SS: m: m

K0sK0s= .498 GeV, c= .498 GeV, c = 2.68 cm = 2.68 cm

KK00SS ++ + + (~69%) (~69%)

mm = 1.116 GeV, c = 1.116 GeV, c = 7.89 cm = 7.89 cm

+ p (~64%)+ p (~64%)

mm = 1.116 GeV, c = 1.116 GeV, c = 7.89 cm = 7.89 cm

+ + p (~64%)p (~64%)

STAR Preliminary

STAR Preliminary

KK00SS

STAR Preliminary

Page 7: STAR Christine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006 1 1 Two particle azimuthal correlations in Cu+Cu collisions

STARChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale UniversityChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University

DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006DNP, Nashville, 28 October 200677

ResultsResults

Within errors, no significant difference between

Meson and baryon

Particle and antiparticle

Cu+Cu @ sNN = 200 GeV3.0 < pT trigger < 6.01.5 < pT assoc < pT trigger

-1 < < 1

reflectedreflected reflectedreflected

reflectedreflectedreflectedreflected

Cen

trC

en

tral

al

Peri

ph

era

lP

eri

ph

era

l

particleparticle//anti-particleanti-particlebaryonbaryon//mesonmeson

Page 8: STAR Christine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006 1 1 Two particle azimuthal correlations in Cu+Cu collisions

STARChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale UniversityChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University

DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006DNP, Nashville, 28 October 200688

Background Background subtractionsubtraction

Background (combinatorial + flow)B(1+2v2(trigger)v2(assoc) cos(2 ) )

Sources of systematic error:

Different methods:

Fit

Assume zero yield at minimum (ZYAM)

Use one bin for minimumUse a few bins for minimum

Error in v2

Used v2{CuCu-pp}

Systematic and random errors in v2

v2 larger in peripheral collisions

20-30% systematic error in near-side yields

0

Page 9: STAR Christine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006 1 1 Two particle azimuthal correlations in Cu+Cu collisions

STARChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale UniversityChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University

DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006DNP, Nashville, 28 October 200699

Results – Near-side yieldsResults – Near-side yields

ZYAM (3 points) used

No strong particle type dependence

Systematic errors may be particle type dependent

Yield rises with pT

trigger

Page 10: STAR Christine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006 1 1 Two particle azimuthal correlations in Cu+Cu collisions

STARChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale UniversityChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University

DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006DNP, Nashville, 28 October 20061010

Results - Results - Comparison to Au+AuComparison to Au+Au

Cu+Cu similar to Au+Au

Yield increases with pT trigger

No significant particle type dependence

Significant ridge yield in Au+Au

Investigations of Ridge vs Jet yield in Cu+Cu necessary

Page 11: STAR Christine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006 1 1 Two particle azimuthal correlations in Cu+Cu collisions

STARChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale UniversityChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University

DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006DNP, Nashville, 28 October 20061111

Results - Results - Comparison to Au+AuComparison to Au+Au

Yields in Cu+Cu consistent with Au+Au at similar Npart

Cu+Cu can be used for studying jet and ridge yield at low Npart

STAR preliminary

near-

sid

e

Cu+Cu 0-10%Cu+Cu 0-10%

Page 12: STAR Christine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006 1 1 Two particle azimuthal correlations in Cu+Cu collisions

STARChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale UniversityChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University

DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006DNP, Nashville, 28 October 20061212

ConclusionsConclusions

Near-side yield trends similar to Au+Au

Yield rises with pT trigger

Yield is dependent on Npart

No significant difference betweenMeson /baryon triggers

Particle /antiparticle triggers

Ridge is a major contribution to near-side yield in Au+Au

Ridge contribution in Cu+Cu needs to be investigated

Page 13: STAR Christine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006 1 1 Two particle azimuthal correlations in Cu+Cu collisions

STARChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale UniversityChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University

DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006DNP, Nashville, 28 October 20061313

Work to come...Work to come...- correlations in Cu+Cu

Jet vs Ridge yield comparisons

V0 associated particles (unidentified triggers) in Cu+Cu

Study composition of ridge

Multistrange trigger particles (,,,-) in Cu+Cu

Test recombination model

V0-V0 correlations?

See Jana Bielcikova and JSee Jana Bielcikova and Jörörn n Putschke's talks at Quark Putschke's talks at Quark

Matter!Matter!

Page 14: STAR Christine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006 1 1 Two particle azimuthal correlations in Cu+Cu collisions

STARChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale UniversityChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University

DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006DNP, Nashville, 28 October 20061414

Backup slidesBackup slides

Page 15: STAR Christine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006 1 1 Two particle azimuthal correlations in Cu+Cu collisions

STARChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale UniversityChristine Nattrass (STAR Collaboration), Yale University

DNP, Nashville, 28 October 2006DNP, Nashville, 28 October 20061515