star measurement of jet modification in au+au collisions
DESCRIPTION
STAR Measurement of Jet Modification in Au+Au Collisions. Fuqiang Wang Purdue University for the Collaboration. – OUTLINE – motivation analysis results summary. Physics motivation. The goal of RHIC is to create QGP – - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Fuqiang Wang – Users’ meeting workshop – Jets, jT, kT 1
– OUTLINE –
motivationanalysisresults
summary
Fuqiang WangPurdue University
for the Collaboration
STAR Measurement of Jet Modification in Au+Au
Collisions
Fuqiang Wang – Users’ meeting workshop – Jets, jT, kT 2
Physics motivationThe goal of RHIC is to create QGP –
a state of deconfined, thermalized quarks and gluons
Lattice QCD prediction:
F. Karsch, Nucl. Phys. A698, 199c (2002)
TC ~ 170 15 MeV
C ~ 0.5 GeV/fm3
Two prerequisites:(1) High enough energy
density(2) Parton thermalization
Fuqiang Wang – Users’ meeting workshop – Jets, jT, kT 3
(1) energy density: Bjorken estimate
Cold nuclear matter:0 ~ 0.16 GeV/fm3
30.5 GeV/fmC
Boost invariant hydrodynamics: Bjorken Estimate of Initial Energy Density
d
dNp
Rdy
dE
Rch
TT
2
31122
30x0
nucl-ex/0311017
PRL 87 (01) 52301
~1 fm/c
Low bound: likely is smaller at RHIC.
ET drops with time.
Fuqiang Wang – Users’ meeting workshop – Jets, jT, kT 4
(1) energy density: “measuring” it?
Jet quenching:• Large pT partons/jets are generated early (initial hard-scatterings) d+Au ~ p+p: hard-scatterings are similar in Au+Au and p+p• Partons / jets need time to escape the collision zone, during which a QGP (or whatever medium) is formed.• Partons/jets lose energy when traversing and interacting with the medium (final state interactions) modifications to jets
Fuqiang Wang – Users’ meeting workshop – Jets, jT, kT 5
(1) energy density: inferred from models
pQCD calculations:
x30 gluon density x100 energy densityin central Au+Au collisions~ Bjorken estimate
X.-N. Wang, PLB 579 (04) 299
Fuqiang Wang – Users’ meeting workshop – Jets, jT, kT 6
Measuring the lost energy?
How is energy distributed?
amount of energy loss?
contribution from medium?
possible… by going to low pT.S. Pal, S. Pratt, PLB574 (2003) 21.X.-N. Wang, PLB 579 (2004) 299, nucl-th/0307036.C.A. Salgado, U.A. Wiedemann, hep-ph/0310079.M. Gyulassy, I. Vitev, X.-N. Wang, B.-W. Zhang, nucl-th/0302077.……
Pal, Pratt, PLB 574 (2003) 21
Fuqiang Wang – Users’ meeting workshop – Jets, jT, kT 7
(2) thermalizationThermalization in the final state:
• Final state low pT hadron distributions look thermal.• Event-by-event <pT> variation is small:
every event looks thermal.• Hadron compositions described by thermal models.• TChemical ~ 160 MeV ~ TC.Necessary but not sufficient condition for early thermalization.
Early state thermalization?
• First time at RHIC elliptic flow at low pT described by hydro:zero mean free path max. possible v2.
• SPS v2 lower than hydro, however energy density may be not much lower.
NA49, PRC 68 (2003) 34903
Fuqiang Wang – Users’ meeting workshop – Jets, jT, kT 8
(2) thermalization at work?
yes… by putting two sources of particles together:• one from jet fragmentation that are initially hard.• the other from bulk medium that are soft.
going to low pT.
medium
jet
Fuqiang Wang – Users’ meeting workshop – Jets, jT, kT 9
Are leading particles from jets?
PHENIX, PRL 91, 172301 (2003)
p / ~ 0.9 in central
p / ~ 0.3 in peripheral
non-frag. p / ~ 0.6non-frag. p / Nch ~ 0.3
pT=3-4 GeV/c: ~30% are probably from other sources.
B. Alper, NPB 87 (1975) 41
p+p @ ISRQM’04
Fuqiang Wang – Users’ meeting workshop – Jets, jT, kT 10
Coalescence / recombination models
Fries et al, PRC 68 (03) 44902 Greco et al, PRC 68 (03) 34904
Hwa et al, nucl-th/0401001Coalescence / recombination models
predict a range of non-fragmentation contributions.
All predict a rapid drop of non-fragmentation contribution above 4 GeV/c.
pT>4 GeV/c: may mainly come from jets, or related to jets.
Fuqiang Wang – Users’ meeting workshop – Jets, jT, kT 11
Reconstructing low pT associated particles
High pT particle
p+p
High pT particle
Au+Au
• Select a leading particle 4<pT<6 GeV/c, ||<0.75.
• Associate other particles (0.15<pT<4 GeV/c,||<1.1) with the leading particle. Form correlation.
• Background from mix- events. v2 modulation on background. Normalize in 0.9<||<1.3.
• Efficiency corrections are applied to associated particles.
• Take difference and normalize per trigger.
(1/N
trig)
dN
/d(
)
STAR Preliminary
background
Signal
p+pJet-like structures
Au+Au top 5%
4 6 GeV/c, 0.15 4 GeV/ctrig assocT Tp p
Fuqiang Wang – Users’ meeting workshop – Jets, jT, kT 12
Azimuth angular correlations
M.G. Albrow et al. NPB145, 305 (1978)High pT:1/
Ntr
igge
r dN
/d()
(radians)
Low pT:
near side: ||<1.1, ||<1.4
away side: ||<2, ||<1.1
Fuqiang Wang – Users’ meeting workshop – Jets, jT, kT 13
(1/N
trig)
dN/d
() bkgd subt.
(1/N
trig)
dN/d
()
Au+Au top 5%
near
“Jet” sizes
With increasing centrality:• Near side broadens in but not .• Away side modest increase in size.
STAR Preliminary
4 / 12
/ 12
near: ||<1.1, ||<1.4away: ||<2, ||<1.1
4 6 GeV/c, 0.15 4 GeV/ctrig assocT Tp p
RMS
Fuqiang Wang – Users’ meeting workshop – Jets, jT, kT 14
assoc
away
1.5 Tp
trig assoc
near
1.5T Tp p
“Jet” charge multiplicity and “energy”
With the same final leading particle,we are selecting a larger energy jet
in central AA than in pp.
AA pp
For the same final leading particle
(4 < < 6 GeV/c):
near side "jet" energy difference:
1.4 0.2 0.2 GeV
away diff. in TPC 2.2 0.2 0.3 GeV
trigTp
E E
STAR Preliminary
p+p
Leading particle: 4 6 GeV/c
4.5 GeV/c
Associated particle: 0.15 4 GeV/c
trigT
trigT
T
p
p
p
Fuqiang Wang – Users’ meeting workshop – Jets, jT, kT 15
Medium contribution?
points: lines:T Tp p
away near
T Tp p
TPC acceptance of away side partner?
Total scalar pT:Initial parton energy + medium contribution?
Fuqiang Wang – Users’ meeting workshop – Jets, jT, kT 16
Jet quenching model
X.-N. Wang, PLB 579 (2004) 299, nucl-th/0307036
with energy loss
without energy loss
E = 1.4 – 2.2 GeV}Caution: cannot be readily compared to data yet.
Fuqiang Wang – Users’ meeting workshop – Jets, jT, kT 17
Thermal-shower recombination
Hwa, Yang, nucl-th/0401001
In this model, the thermal-shower recombination is the largest contributionto high pT particles.
One mechanism for energycontribution from medium.
Fuqiang Wang – Users’ meeting workshop – Jets, jT, kT 18
Away
syst. error
Associated particles pT distributions
STAR Preliminary
Near side:
overallenhancementfrom pp to AA
larger initialparton energy(and modestenergy loss)?
4 6 GeV/ctrigTp
Away side:
energy from theinitial parton has been converted
to lower pT
particles
energy loss inmedium!
Near
Fuqiang Wang – Users’ meeting workshop – Jets, jT, kT 19
Away side <pT>
away side associated particle <pT> decreases
with centrality, approachingmedium hadron <pT> in
central collisions
equilibration between the two sources of particles
Fuqiang Wang – Users’ meeting workshop – Jets, jT, kT 20
(1/N
trig)
dN/d
()
STAR Preliminary
p+p Au+Au 5%trig4 6 GeV/c
0.15 4 GeV/cT
T
p
p
Fit to near side: const. + gaussian + Borghini-cos(fixed)
stat. mom. conserv.Borghini et al.
free fit
stat. mom. conserv.Borghini et al.
Broadened distribution and thermalization
HIJINGall
STAR|| < 0.5
p+p 0.23 0.26
Au+Au 5% 0.31 0.50
2 2 [GeV/c]Tp1 2
2all all
2pT T T
T
p pC
N p
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Borghini et al. PRC 62, 034902 (2000):
jet .2
.
cos( )
( )Tacc
TTall
pdNP
d p
the away side excess approaching equilibrium with the medium!
Cannot distinguish: (1) the full event participates in momentum balance. (2) Only a handful particles: e.g. jet-jet production.
the away excess has a similar shape to a stat. distr. from momentum conservation.
Fuqiang Wang – Users’ meeting workshop – Jets, jT, kT 21
Summary
(1) high enough energy density?
Models require x30 normal nuclear gluon density to describe suppression data.
Statistical reconstruction of jets in pp and AA collisions.Potential possibility of experimental measure of energy loss.
Same pT leading particles come from larger jet energy in central AA than in pp.
• Near side: overall increase in multiplicity.
• Away side: increase in multiplicity and softening in pT.
(2) parton thermalization?
• Away side: towards thermalization in more central collisions.
• May imply high degree of thermalization in medium itself.