stat 35b: introduction to probability with applications to poker outline for the day:
DESCRIPTION
Stat 35b: Introduction to Probability with Applications to Poker Outline for the day: Uniform random variables and R Kaplan vs. Gazes, More counting problems Express, implied and reverse implied odds Yang vs. Kravchenko. u u . Uniform Random Variables and R - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Stat 35b: Introduction to Probability with Applications to Poker
Outline for the day:
1. Uniform random variables and R
2. Kaplan vs. Gazes,
3. More counting problems
4. Express, implied and reverse implied odds
5. Yang vs. Kravchenko
1. Uniform Random Variables and R
Continuous random variables are often characterized by their
probability density functions (pdf, or density):
a function f(x) such that P{X is in B} = ∫B f(x) dx .
Uniform: f(x) = c, for x in (a, b).
= 0, for all other x.
[Note: c must = 1/(b-a), so that ∫ab f(x) dx = P{X is in (a,b)} = 1.]
(For teams & examples for hw & computer projects, see
http://www.stat.ucla.edu/~frederic/35b/F09/diamond1.txt )
2) Poker After Dark: Kaplan vs. Gazes
3) More counting problems
-- How likely is it to make 4-of-a-kind? 1 in ___ ?
-- What about the probability of flopping 4-of-a-kind?
-- What about the prob. of flopping 4-of-a-kind, given that you have a pocket pair?
-- Is it less likely than …
* flopping an ace-high flush?
* flopping a straight-flush?
Suppose you’re all in next hand, no matter what cards you get.
P(eventually make 4-of-a-kind)? [including case where all 4 are on board]
Trick: just forget card order, and consider all collections of 7 cards.
Out of choose(52,7) different combinations, each equally likely, how many of them
involve 4-of-a-kind?
13 choices for the 4-of-a-kind.
For each such choice, there are choose(48,3) possibilities for the other 3 cards.
So, P(4-of-a-kind) = 13 * choose(48,3) / choose(52,7) ~ 0.168%, or 1 in 595.
P(flop 4-of-a-kind) =
13*48 / choose(52,5) = 0.024% = 1 in 4165.
P(flop 4-of-a-kind | pocket pair)?
No matter which pocket pair you have, there are choose(50,3) possible flops,
each equally likely, and how many of them give you 4-of-a-kind?
48. (e.g. if you have 7 7, then need to flop 77 x, & there are 48 choices for x)
So P(flop 4-of-a-kind | pp) = 48/choose(50,3) = 0.245% = 1 in 408.
P(flop an ace high flush)? [where the ace might be on the board]
-- 4 suits
-- one of the cards must be an ace. choose(12,4) possibilities for the others.
So P(flop ace high flush) = 4 * choose(12,4) / choose(52,5)
= 0.0762%, or 1 in 1313.
P(flop a straight flush)?
-- 4 suits
-- 10 different straight-flushes in each suit. (5 high, 6 high, …, Ace high)
So P(flop straight flush) = 4 * 10 / choose(52,5)
= 0.00154%, or 1 in 64974.
4) Express, implied, and reverse implied odds.
From previous lecture: to call an all-in, need P(win) > B ÷ (B+pot).
Expressed as an odds ratio, this is sometimes referred to as pot odds or express
odds.
If the bet is not all-in & another betting round is still to come, need
P(win) > wager ÷ (wager + winnings),
where winnings = pot + amount you’ll win on later betting rounds,
wager = total amount you will wager including the current round & later rounds,
assuming no folding.
The terms Implied-odds / Reverse-implied-odds describe the cases where
winnings > pot or where wager > B, respectively.
5. Yang / Kravchenko.
Yang A 10. Pot is 19million. Bet is 8.55 million.
Needs P(win) > 8.55 ÷ (8.55 + 19) = 31%.
vs. AA: 8.5%. AJ-AK: 25-27%. KK-TT: 29%. 99-22: 44-48%. KQs: 56%.
Bayesian method: average these probabilities, weighting each by its likelihood.
Yang / Kravchenko.
Yang A 10. Pot is 19.0 million. Bet is 8.55 million.
Suppose that, averaging the different probabilities, P(Yang wins) = 30%.
And say Yang calls. Let X = the number of chips Kravchenko has after the hand.
What is E(X)? [Note, if Yang folds, then X = 19.0 million for sure.]
E(X) = ∑ [k * P(X=k)]
= [0 * 30%] + [27.55 million * 70%]
= 19.285 million.