state annual action plan 2015-16 - amrut.gov.inamrut.gov.in/writereaddata/saap_cg.pdf · o amrut...

CHHATTISGARH

STATE ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2015-16

Table of Content Content Page No.

• Section 1

o Check list SAAP as per Table 6.2 - 1-2

o Check List SAAP as per Table 6.3 - 3-5

• Section 2 -

o MoM of SHPSC - 6-12

• Section 3 -

o Mission Background - 13-15

• Section 4 -

o CG - SAAP - 16

SAAP GoI Questionnaire - 17-24

• Section 5 -

o Sector wise breakup & Sharing of Investment Graph - 26

o Sector Wise Breakup of Consolidated Investment - 27

o ULB wise Source of Funds for Primary Thrust Sector - 28

o ULB wise Source of Funds for Water Supply Sector - 29-30

o ULB Wise Source of Funds for Sewerage and Septage Management Sectors - 31-32

o ULB Wise Source of Funds for Park & Green Space Sectors - 33


o Sector Wise Breakup of Consolidated Investment - 35

o Table 1.1: Breakup of Total MoUD Allocation in AMRUT - 36

o Table 1.2.1: Abstract-Sector Wise Proposed Total Project Fund and Sharing Pattern - 37

o Table 1.2.2: Abstract-Break-up of Total Fund Sharing Pattern - 38

o Table 1.3: Abstract-Use of Funds on Projects: On Going and New - 39

o Table 1.4: Abstract- Plan for Achieving Service Level Benchmarks - 40

o Table 3.1: SAAP- Master Plan of all projects to achieve universal coverage during the

current Mission period based on Table 2.1 (FYs 2015-16 to 2019-20) - 42

o Table 3.2: SAAP- Sector Wise Breakup of Consolidated Investments for all AMRUT

ULBs in the State- 43

o Table 3.3:SAAP-ULB Wise Source of Funds for All Sectors - 44

o Table 3.4 : SAAP-Year Wise Share of Investments for All Sectors (ULB Wise) - 45

o Table 3.5: SAAP-State level Plan for Achieving Service Level Benchmarks - 46

o Table 3.6: SAAP-State level Plan for Action for Physical and Financial Progress - 47-51

o Table 4: SAAP - Broad Proposed Allocations for Administrative and Other Expenses - 53

o Table 5.1: SAAP - Reforms Type, Steps and Target for AMRUT Cities FY - 2015 - 16 - 55-58

o Table 5.2: SAAP- Reform Type, Steps and Target for AMRUT Cities FY-2016-17. - 59-61

o Table 5.3: SAAP - Reforms Type, Steps and Target for AMRUT Cities FY - 2017 – 18 - 62


o Table 5.4: SAAP - Reforms Type, Steps and Target for AMRUT Cities FY - 2018 – 19- 63

o Table 7.1 ULB Level Individual Capacity Development Plan - 65-66

o Table 7.2 Annual Action Plan for Capacity Building - 67-70

• Section 6 -

o Citizen & Stakeholders Consultation – Ward Wise Citizen consultation, MIC

resolution & Honb’le MPs - 71-111

o AMRUT City Map Chhattisgarh 112

Section 1

Chhattisgarh –AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-16

Checklist - Consolidated State Annual Action Plan of all ULBs to be sent for Assessment by MoUD (as per Table 6.2)

State:-Chhattisgarh

S.No. Points of Consideration Yes/No Give Details 1. Have all the Cities prepared SLIP as per the suggested

approach? Yes SLIPs prepared and submitted by the cities are as per AMRUT guidelines and is in conformity with the National and State Priority i.e. providing universal coverage of water and sewerage/Septage in AMRUT cities.

2. Has the SAAP prioritized proposed investments across cities?

Yes

SAAP has prioritized proposed investment across cities as per principle of prioritization (para 7.2) of AMRUT. investment has been broadly distributed across all 09 cities. Distribution of investment is based on priority for providing 100% universal coverage in primary thrust sectors.

3. Is the indicator wise summary of improvements proposed (both investments and management improvements) by State in place apt ? Yes

Indicator wise summary of improvements proposed by the State is enclosed at Table 1.4 of SAAP. Service level indicator of NMT, Parks & Green space will be assessed in the current FY and will be included in forthcoming FY's SLIP & SAAP.

4. Have all the cities under Mission identified/done baseline assessments of the service coverage indicators?

Yes SLB notification of all 09 mission cities carried out from FY 2011-12 up to 2014-15.

5. Are SAAPs addressing an approach towards meeting Service Level Benchmarks as agreed by Ministry for each Sector?

Yes SAAP has been prepared to meet Service Level Benchmarks agreed by the Ministry

6. Is the investment proposed commensurate to the level of improvement envisaged in the indicator? Yes

The proposed investments commensurate to the Service Level Improvement envisaged in the indicator.

7. Are the shares of the State and the ULB in line with the proposed Mission approach?

Yes

State Share will be 40 % in case of cities with million + population and 30 % in case of cities with population below one million. ULB Share will be 20 % in case of million + cities and 26.67 % in case of cities having population less than one million.

1 of 112

Chhattisgarh –AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-16S.No. Points of Consideration Yes/No Give Details

8. Is there a need for additional resources and have stateconsidered raising additional resources (Stateprograms, aided projects, additional devolution tocities, 14th Finance Commission, external sources)?

Yes

Efforts are being made to mobilize additional resources through 14th FC, External sources, and from reform incentive fund of AMRUT.

9. Does State Annual Action Plan verify that the cities have undertaken financial projections to identify revenue requirements for O & M and repayments? Yes

The operation & maintenance (O&M) of the projects proposed under the mission shall be reimbursed by user-charges collected by the ULBs. The additional fund required for O&M and repayment shall be worked out in detail at the time of preparation of DPR.

10. Has the State Annual Action Plan considered the resource mobilization capacity of each ULB to ensure that ULB share can be mobilized?

Yes Considering the week financial base of ULBs in Chhattisgarh detailed computation is not carried out but efforts are being made to mobilize maximum portion of ULB share through 14FC grant.

11. Has the process of establishment of PDMC been initiated? Yes

SHPSC has authorized MD to initiate process of establishment of PDMC.

12. Has a roadmap been prepared to realize the resource potential of the ULB? Yes

The resource potential of each city has been considered while preparing SAAP.

13. Is the implementation plan for projects and reforms in place (Timelines and yearly milestones)? Yes

Implementation of reforms shall be as per timelines set in the mission guidelines. At the same time detailed implementation plan for projects shall be prepared in DPRs preparation process.

14. Has the prioritization of projects in ULBs been done in accordance with para 7.2 of the guidelines ? Yes

Projects have been prioritized in accordance with Para 7.2 of the guidelines with main consideration of potential smart city, universal coverage principal, ULBs resource capabilities etc.

minutes of the SHPSC attached.

(State Mission Director)

2 of 112

Chhattisgarh –AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-16Check List - Tentative Appraisal of State level Action Plans by MoUD (as per Table 6.3)

Area of Appraisal Yes/No Supporting Documents Remarks

1. Has the State prioritized cities andsectors based on the baseline data?

Yes SLB notification of all 09 mission cities carried out since FY 2011-12 up to 2014-15.

2. Has the State ensured that low or no cost improvements have been identified by each city?

Yes State shall ensure that low cost alternatives are explored during preparation of DPRs.

3. How well has the state planned and financed capital expenditure?

Yes ULBs of Chhattisgarh are not financially sound and will not be able to contribute more than 10-20% of the capital expenditure. Therefore, capital expenditure under the mission will be largely funded by the GoI& State. As stated above ULB Share will be 26.67 % in case of million plus cities and 20 % in case of cities having population less than one million.

4. What is the expected level of financial support from the Central Government and how well have the State/ULB and other sources of finance been identified and accessed?

Yes Financial support for projects proposed under AMRUT will be provided by GoI as per funding pattern stipulated in the guidelines of the mission. Remaining amount will be funded by the State Government and respective ULBs.

5. Has the State ensured that the State share has been adequately budgeted?

Yes State Share proposals to be incorporated in state budget as per recommendation of SHPSC & concurrence of Department of Finance.

3 of 112

Chhattisgarh –AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-16Area of Appraisal Yes/No Supporting Documents Remarks

6. Has the State instituted enoughmeasures to ensure that cities areassisted to mobilise their share ofproject cost, as may be necessary?

Yes The resource potential of each city has been considered while preparing SAAP and weaker ULBs shall be able to contribute their share by contribution of 14FC grant. State will make necessary arrangement for fund flow for project implementation.

7. Has the State engaged Project Development and Management Consultant to manage projects and reforms ?

Yes Draft RFP for engagement of PDMC is ready. SHPSC has authorized mission director to appoint PDMC

8. Have the FFC grants been released to the ULBs in the State?

Yes FFC grant will be released to ULBs time to time as per mandate and allocation of FFC.

9. Have other performance requirements of FFC been complied with?

Yes Micro level planning under process.

10. How well the state has planned to move towards achievement of universal coverage and benchmarks in water supply, sewerage/septage, urban transport and storm water ?

Yes State seeks to achieve 100% universal coverage for Water Supply, Sewerage/Septage, Parks & Green Spaces in all Mission cities. However achievement of benchmarks in NMT and Storm Water Drainage sectors are in planning stage as service level gaps are not available with ULBs.

11. Have the targets (Timelines and Milestones) for reforms been developed ?

Yes Targets Timelines and Milestones for reforms have been developed by state in line with mission guideline. Detailed micro level timeline will be developed at the time of DPR preparation.

4 of 112

Chhattisgarh –AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-16Area of Appraisal Yes/No Supporting Documents Remarks

12. Has the State explored the potentialfor PPP in the proposed projects?

Yes In-depth analysis will be under taken to explore PPP option for Operation & Maintenance (O&M) of the Water Supply and Sewerage/septage, Parks, Reforms projects, while preparing the Detailed Project Reports (DPRs)

13. Has a financial intermediary been established?

Yes State is exploring various business model for establishment of financial intermediary.

14. How well has the diagnostic been done for gap analysis at state level?

Yes Gap Analysis has been done with reference to the SLB data of ULB, Census-2011, and SLIP submitted by the cities.

15. How well are the techno financial details of the projects?

Yes Techno financial details are as per line estimates.It will be explored in details during preparation of DPR.

16. Has the state followed policy of prioritization given in para 7.2 ?

Yes Projects have been prioritized in accordance with Para 7.2 of the guidelines with main consideration of potential smart city, universal coverage principal, ULBs resource capabilities etc.

5 of 112

Section 2


MoM of SHPSC

Dated:-20.10.2015

6 of 112

user

Stamp

7 of 112

8 of 112

9 of 112

10 of 112

11 of 112

12 of 112

Section 3


AMRUT Mission

Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD), Government of India launched Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT) on 25th June 2015 for

next 5 Years (March 2020) to augment infrastructure for providing urban basic services like water supply, sewerage, septage management, urban transport etc. to

households, aiming to improve the quality of life for all, especially the poor and the disadvantaged. Ministry has also made a departure from its earlier practice of

sanctioning projects. Under AMRUT, the Ministry will itself accord approval to the State Annual Action Plan (SAAP). Based on the approved SAAP, States High

Power Steering Committee will sanction and approve the projects. Hence, the AMRUT makes States equal partners in planning and implementation of projects and

promoting the spirit of cooperative federalism in the country.

The sole purpose of the Mission is to ensure that every household has access to a tap water with assured supply and connected with sewerage line or septage

management facility. Beyond household level services, its aim is to improve urban environment to add values in the city and its citizen by adopting multi pronged

strategy. Prominent among them are promoting non-motorized public transport, developing open and green space and promoting cities to adapt innovative

strategy, practices and technologies.

AMRUT mission tacitly emphasizes that new set of policy formulation and analytical skills is required amongst urban managers to handle urban challenges.

Therefore, specialist knowledge in urban planning, engineering, municipal finance and its management to facilitate cross-cutting plans and projects at ULB level will

be needed to meet the challenges.

13 of 112

Chhattisgarh –AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-16Coverage and Support & Mission Thrust Area

14 of 112


Nine cities of Chhattisgarh having one lakh or more population are identified under the mission by GoI. Mission cities and thrust areas under mission are:-

15 of 112

Section 4


State Annual Action Plan (SAAP)

16 of 112

Chhattisgarh –AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-16State Annual Action Plan (SAAP) GoI Questionnaire

The basic building block for the SAAP is the SLIPs prepared and approved by the ULBs. At the State level, the SLIPs of all Mission cities have been aggregated into the SAAP. While preparing SAAP, information corresponding to the following questions is indicated against each question:

Question: Has the State Government diagnosed service level gaps?

Yes, State government has diagnosed service level gaps for the State using the information provided in SLIP. While preparing SLIP Cities considered CDPs, Census-2011, notified SLB data , DPRs and ongoing project data. In addition, data of consultation process is also considered in SLIP preparation.

Question: Has the State planned for and financed capital expenditure?

Yes, State government has agreed to provide matching share with GoI share against the Capital expenditure based on the following criteria.

1. For Cities with million plus Population, 40.00% and 26.67 % of the Project Cost will be funded by the State and ULBs respectively.

2. For Cities with less than million Population 30.00% and 20.00% of the Project Cost will be funded by the State and ULBs respectively.

ULB share of project cost shall be borne by the respective ULBs from their own resources, FFC grant and through financing from financial institutions. Detailed fund flow will be derived at the time of DPR sanction.

The operation & maintenance (O&M) of the projects proposed under the mission shall be funded by the grants-in-aid provided to ULB through various sources , 10% additional reforms incentive fund proposed under AMRUT and user-charges collected by the ULB .

Question: Has the State moved towards achievement of universal coverage in water supply and sewerage/septage?

Yes, State has assessed the gap in universal coverage of water supply and sewerage/septage. Many schemes are under implementation/in pipeline/committed/approved either from State or from GoI. The funds available under ongoing/committed projects have been considered and gap is worked out after ensuring the project requirement by converging with other schemes. The city-wise timelines for achieving the goal is enclosed to respective table of SAAP.

17 of 112

Chhattisgarh –AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-16Question: What is the expected level of the financial support from the Central Government and how well have State/ULB and other sources of finance been identified and accessed?

The financial support from the Central Government for projects proposed under AMRUT is as per funding pattern stipulated in the guidelines of the mission, as mentioned below:

1. 1/3 (One Third) of the project cost as grant from GoI:• For projects proposed by the cities with a population of above 10 Lakh under Water Supply, Sewerage/Septage, Storm Water Drains and

Urban Transport Components.2. 1/2 (Half) of the project cost as grant from GoI:

• For projects proposed by the cities with a population up-to 10 Lakh under Water Supply, Sewerage/Septage, Storm Water Drains & UrbanTransport Components.

• For projects proposed to develop Green Spaces and Parks by all the cities included under AMRUT.3. 100% by GoI:

• Reform projects & State funds for Administrative & Office Expenses (A&OE).

Question: How fairly and equitably have the needs of the ULBs been given due consideration?

While formulating Service Level Improvement Plans (SLIPs) close consultation with all the stakeholders(as suggested in guideline) has been done to analyse the needs of the ULBs. The projects proposed under the mission have also been identified as per the diagnosed service level gaps and is also in concurrence with the National Priority to provide universal coverage of water and sewerage/septage. Once universal coverage for Water Supply and Sewerage/ Septage is achieved, the next priority of the State is to improve other sector. Therefore projects related to it are likely to be proposed. Storm Water Drainage is the last priority as flooding is not a serious problem in the cities included under AMRUT in Chhattisgarh (as assessed through SLB data). Apart from these projects dedicated fund for projects related to green spaces of amount maximum up to 2.5% of SAAP.

Question: Have adequate consultations with all stakeholders been done, including citizens, local MPs and other public representatives?

Yes, adequate consultations with all stakeholders including Mayors, Mayor In Council, Local MPs, Citizens (Citython) & representative from various departments/parastatal have been done . Valuable suggestions/views given by stake holders have been incorporated during preparation & finalization of SLIP. Details of consultations done is enclosed at Annexure.

18 of 112


Important steps to be followed for preparation of SAAP are mentioned below.

1.0 Principles of Prioritization

The State has identified project based on gap analysis. While prioritizing projects, universal coverage of water supply and sewerage/septage has been given top priority. The analysis showing “Principle of Prioritization”, which has been adopted during prioritization of projects for current financial year is enclosed. Information responding to the following questions has been indicated against each question:

Question: Has consultation with local MPs/MLAs, Mayors and Commissioners of the concerned ULBs been carried out prior to allocation of funding?

Yes, all the stake-holders i.e. elective representative, Commissioners/Chief Municipal Officers, technical officers as well as citizens of the concerned cities have been consulted prior to allocation of funds.

Question: Has financially weaker ULBs given priority for financing?

Yes, All 09 cities SLIP proposal for achieving universal coverage is considered in SAAP. Equal opportunity given to all ULBs based on service level gap for achieving universal coverage. As per decision of SHPSC water supply project for Korba Municipal Corporation will be considered in coming year SAAP.

Question: Is the ULB with a high proportion of urban poor has received higher share?

Yes, All 09 cities SLIP proposal for achieving universal coverage is considered in SAAP. Equal opportunity given to all ULBs based on service level gap for achieving universal coverage.

Question: Has the potential Smart cities been given preference?

Yes, Two cities namely Raipur & Bilaspur have been selected as potential Smart cities. While preparing SLIP, it has been kept in consideration and infrastructure gaps in Smart Cities . While preparation of SAAP priority have been given to both the cities.

19 of 112


Question: How many times projects are proposed in SAAP of the Central Assistance (CA) allocated to the State during 2015-16?

State has proposed projects amounting Rs. 587.17 Crore against CA of Rs. 290.25 Crore which is 2.02 times of the allocated Central Assistance for the financial year 2015-16.

Question: Has the allocation to different ULBs within State is consistent with the urban profile of the state?

As per diagnosed service level and SLIP for achieving universal coverage is incorporated in SAAP. For disbursement of FFC grant as ULB share urban profile norms of area and population considered .

20 of 112


2.0 Importance of O&M

It has been observed that ULBs pay little attention to the operation and maintenance of infrastructure assets created after completion of projects. This tendency on the part of implementing agencies leads to seer loss off national assets. Please provide information in 500 words responding to the following questions regarding importance given to O&M:

Question: Has Projects being proposed in the SAAP includes O & M for at least five years?

Yes, all the projects proposed under the mission considered O&M for at least 5 years. It is also planned to incorporate necessary provision of O&M in DPR and Contract document.

Question: How O&M expenditures are propose to be funded by ULBs/ parastatal?

The operation & maintenance (O&M) of the projects proposed under the mission will be done by the concerned ULBs and the cost of O&M shall be funded through user-charges to be collected by the ULBs and the by dovetailing the available funds provided by the state and central government under various schemes as applicable.

Question: Is it by way of levy of user charges or other revenue streams?

It is proposed that cost of O&M shall be recovered by way of user-charges to be collected by the concerned ULBs. However, in the initial phase until full roll out, the cost of O&M is proposed to be funded by the grants-in-aid provided to ULBs under different head will be utilised. The details of proposal for recovery of O&M shall be formulated while preparation of DPR and will be an integral part of the all the projects proposed under the mission.

Question: Has O&M cost been excluded from project cost for the purpose of funding?

Yes, for the purpose of calculation of the project cost, the O&M cost has been excluded as per guidelines of the mission

21 of 112

Chhattisgarh –AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-16Question: What kind of model been proposed by States/ULBs to fund the O&M?

The O&M shall be done by the concerned ULB and PPP opportunities shall be explored for recovery of user charges. However, in initial phase user charges may not be sufficient to recover the entire O&M cost, for which innovative proposals like energy saving projects, reduction in NRW and other losses etc. have been considered.

Question: Is it through an appropriate cost recovery mechanism in order to make them self-reliant and cost-effective?

Cost recovery mechanism shall be formulated while preparation of DPR and Bid document and will be an integral part of the all the projects proposed under the mission.

22 of 112


3.0 Financing of Projects

Financing is an important element of the SAAP. Each state has been given the maximum share which will be given by the Central Government. (Para 5 of AMRUT Guidelines).The States/ULBs have to plan for the remaining resource generation at the time of preparation of the SAAP. The financial share of cities will vary across States. In some States, the ULBs may be in a position to contribute significantly to the project cost as compared to a ULB in another State. Please provide information responding to the following questions regarding financing of the projects proposed under AMRUT.

Question: How the residual financing (over and above Central Government share) is shared between the States, ULBs?

The financial support from the Central Government for projects proposed under AMRUT is as per funding pattern stipulated in the guidelines of the mission i.e. 1/3 for cities with population above 10 Lakh and 1/2 for cities with population below 10 Lakh. The State Share will be 40 % in case of cities with population above 10 Lakh and 30% in case of cities with population below 10 Lakh and remaining amount shall be borne by the ULBs.

Question: Has any other sources identified by the State/ULB (e.g. PPP, market borrowing)?

Yes, efforts are being made to mobilize additional resources through various funding agency, multilateral support. However, at this stage exact details have not been worked out. It is proposed that the same shall be worked out while preparing the DPRs.

Question: What is the State contribution to the SAAP? (it should not be less than 20 percent of the total project cost, Para 7.4 of AMRUT Guidelines)

The State has agreed to provide matching share. Matching share from the state will be 40% in case of cities with population above 10 Lakh and 30% in case of cities with population below 10 Lakh.

Question: Whether complete project cost is linked with revenue sources in SAAP?

Yes, ULB share is funded through FFC, self revene and 10% additional reforms incentive fund proposed under AMRUT which can be availed by ULBs.

23 of 112

Chhattisgarh –AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-16Question: Has projects been dovetailed with other sectoral and financial programme of the Centre and State Governments?

Yes, projects have been dovetailed/converged with ongoing/sanctioned projects under JnNURM, UIDSSMT, Smart City, SBM etc.

Question: Is state planning to create a Financial Intermediary, in order to pool funds from all sources and release funds to ULBs in time? Please provide detail.

State is exploring various business model for planning of establishing of financial Intermediary .This institution will be established within stipulated timeline of reform implementation.

Question: Has States/UTs explored the possibility of using Public Private Partnerships (PPP), as an preferred execution model?

While formulating the Detailed Project Reports (DPRs), PPP option shall be explored for Operation & Maintenance (O&M) of the Water Supply and Sewerage/Septage, Parks and reform projects.

Question: Are PPP options included appropriate Service Level Agreements (SLAs) which may lead to the People Public Private Partnership (PPPP) model?

The PPP options including appropriate Service Level Agreements (SLAs) leading to the People Public Private Partnership (PPPP) model shall be worked out while preparing the DPRs.

24 of 112

Section 5

Chhattisgarh – AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-16

Format of State Annual Action Plan

Name of State-Chhattisgarh

Time Period :FY 2015-16

25 of 112


26 of 112


Name of State: Chhattisgarh Sector Wise Breakup of Consolidated Investments for all AMRUT ULBs in the State to achieve 100% benchmarks for Primary Thrust Sectors viz.

Water Supply & Sewerage/Septage Management for FY 2015-20

(Amount in Cr) S.No. Name of

City Water Supply

Sewerage and Septage

Management

Drainage Urban Transport

Others ( Parks) Total Reforms Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 Raipur 147.00 651.29 - - 12.00 810.29 3.39 813.68

2 Bilaspur 245.53 21.79 - - 8.00 275.32 3.39 278.71

3 Durg 47.43 15.00 - - 4.30 66.73 1.00 67.73

4 Bhilai 231.11 20.00 - - 4.30 255.41 1.00 256.41

5 Rajnandgaon 80.83 12.00 - - 4.30 97.13 1.00 98.13

6 Korba 201.36 18.00 - - 4.30 223.66 1.00 224.66

7 Raigarh 96.44 10.00 - - 4.30 110.74 1.00 111.74

8 Ambikapur 46.16 6.00 - - 4.30 56.46 1.00 57.46

9 Jagdalpur 74.00 10.00 - - 4.30 88.30 1.00 89.30

Total Project Investments 1169.86 764.08 0.00 0.00 50.10 1984.04 13.78 1997.82

A & OE (@8.98x5 ) 44.90

Grand Total 2042.72

27 of 112

Chhattisgarh – AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-16 Name of State: CHHATTISGARH FY 2015-20

ULB Wise Source of Funds for Primary Thrust Sectors (Amount in Cr.)

S.No. Name of City Centre State ULB Convergence Others (e.g.

incentive)

Total

14th FC Others Total 14th FC

Others Total

1 2 3 4 5 6=4+5 7 8 9=7+8 10 11 12=3+6+9 1 Raipur 273.49 - 324.12 324.12 - 216.08 216.08 - - 813.68

2 Bilaspur 141.05 - 82.60 82.60 - 55.06 55.06 - - 278.71

3 Durg 34.37 - 20.02 20.02 - 13.35 13.35 - - 67.73

4 Bhilai 128.71 - 76.62 76.62 - 51.08 51.08 - - 256.41

5 Rajnandgaon 49.57 - 29.14 29.14 - 19.43 19.43 - - 98.13

6 Korba 112.83 - 67.10 67.10 - 44.73 44.73 - - 224.66

7 Raigarh 56.37 - 33.22 33.22 - 22.15 22.15 - - 111.74

8 Ambikapur 29.23 - 16.94 16.94 - 11.29 11.29 - - 57.46

9 Jagdalpur 45.15 - 26.49 26.49 - 17.66 17.66 - - 89.30

Total 870.75 - 676.24 676.24 - 450.83 450.83 - - 1997.82

28 of 112

Chhattisgarh – AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-16 Name of State: CHHATTISGARH

ULB Wise Source of Funds for Water Supply Sectors (Amount in Cr.)


incentive)

Total


Others Total

1 2 3 4 5 6=4+5 7 8 9=7+8 10 11 12=3+6+9 1 Raipur 49.00 - 58.80 58.80 - 39.20 39.20 - - 147.00

2 Bilaspur 122.77 - 73.66 73.66 - 49.11 49.11 - - 245.53

3 Durg 23.72 - 14.23 14.23 - 9.49 9.49 - - 47.43

4 Bhilai 115.56 - 69.33 69.33 - 46.22 46.22 - - 231.11

5 Rajnandgaon 40.42 - 24.25 24.25 - 16.17 16.17 - - 80.83

6 Korba 100.68 - 60.41 60.41 - 40.27 40.27 - - 201.36

7 Raigarh 48.22 - 28.93 28.93 - 19.29 19.29 - - 96.44

8 Ambikapur 23.08 - 13.85 13.85 - 9.23 9.23 - - 46.16

9 Jagdalpur 37.00 - 22.20 22.20 - 14.80 14.80 - - 74.00

Total 560.43 - 365.66 365.66 243.77 243.77 - - 1169.86

29 of 112


Name of State: CHHATTISGARH ULB Wise Source of Funds for Water Supply Sectors

(Amount in Cr.)


incentive)

Total

Shared 100% TOTAL 14th FC

Others Total 14th FC

Others Total

1 2 3 4 5=3+4 6 7 8=6+7 9 10 11=9+10 12 13 14=5+8+11 1 Raipur 16.33 0.00 16.33 - 19.60 19.60 - 13.07 13.07 - - 49.00

2 Bilaspur 40.92 0.00 40.92 - 24.55 24.55 - 16.37 16.37 - - 81.84

3 Durg 17.84 0.00 17.84 - 10.70 10.70 - 7.13 7.13 - - 35.67

4 Bhilai 38.52 0.00 38.52 - 23.11 23.11 - 15.41 15.41 - - 77.04

5 Rajnandgaon 13.47 0.00 13.47 - 8.08 8.08 - 5.39 5.39 - - 26.94

6 Korba 33.56 0.00 33.56 - 20.14 20.14 - 13.42 13.42 - - 67.12

7 Raigarh 16.07 0.00 16.07 - 9.64 9.64 - 6.43 6.43 - - 32.15

8 Ambikapur 23.08 0.00 23.08 - 13.85 13.85 - 9.23 9.23 - - 46.16

9 Jagdalpur 12.33 0.00 12.33 - 7.40 7.40 - 4.93 4.93 - - 24.67

Total 212.13 0.00 212.13 - 137.08 137.08 91.38 91.38 - - 440.59

30 of 112


Name of State: CHHATTISGARH FYSs 2015-20 ULB Wise Source of Funds for Sewerage and Septage Management Sectors

(Amount in Cr.)


incentive)

Total


Others Total

1 2 3 4 5 6=4+5 7 8 9=7+8 10 11 12=3+6+9 1 Raipur 217.10 - 260.52 260.52 - 173.68 173.68 - - 651.29

2 Bilaspur 10.90 - 6.54 6.54 - 4.36 4.36 - - 21.79

3 Durg 7.50 - 4.50 4.50 - 3.00 3.00 - - 15.00

4 Bhilai 10.00 - 6.00 6.00 - 4.00 4.00 - - 20.00

5 Rajnandgaon 6.00 - 3.60 3.60 - 2.40 2.40 - - 12.00

6 Korba 9.00 - 5.40 5.40 - 3.60 3.60 - - 18.00

7 Raigarh 5.00 - 3.00 3.00 - 2.00 2.00 - - 10.00

8 Ambikapur 3.00 - 1.80 1.80 - 1.20 1.20 - - 6.00

9 Jagdalpur 5.00 - 3.00 3.00 - 2.00 2.00 - - 10.00

Total 273.49 - 294.35 294.35 196.24 196.24 - - 764.08

31 of 112


Name of State: CHHATTISGARH FY 2015-16 ULB Wise Source of Funds for Sewerage and Septage Management Sectors

(Amount in Cr.)


incentive)

Total



Others Total

1 2 3 4 5=3+4 6 7 8=6+7 9 10 11=9+10 12 13 14=5+8+11 1 Raipur 3.33 0.00 3.33 - 4.00 4.00 - 2.67 2.67 - - 10.00

2 Bilaspur 10.90 0.00 10.90 - 6.54 6.54 - 4.36 4.36 - - 21.79

3 Durg 7.50 0.00 7.50 - 4.50 4.50 - 3.00 3.00 - - 15.00

4 Bhilai 10.00 0.00 10.00 - 6.00 6.00 - 4.00 4.00 - - 20.00

5 Rajnandgaon 6.00 0.00 6.00 - 3.60 3.60 - 2.40 2.40 - - 12.00

6 Korba 9.00 0.00 9.00 - 5.40 5.40 - 3.60 3.60 - - 18.00

7 Raigarh 5.00 0.00 5.00 - 3.00 3.00 - 2.00 2.00 - - 10.00

8 Ambikapur 3.00 0.00 3.00 - 1.80 1.80 - 1.20 1.20 - - 6.00

9 Jagdalpur 5.00 0.00 5.00 - 3.00 3.00 - 2.00 2.00 - - 10.00

Total 59.73 0.00 59.73 - 37.84 37.84 25.22 25.22 - - 122.79

32 of 112


Name of State: CHHATTISGARH FY 2015-16 ULB Wise Source of Funds for Park & Green Space Sectors

(Amount in Cr.)


incentive)

Total



Others Total

1 2 3 4 5=3+4 6 7 8=6+7 9 10 11=9+10 12 13 14=5+8+11 1 Raipur 0.80 0.00 0.80 - 0.96 0.96 - 0.64 0.64 - - 2.40

2 Bilaspur 0.80 0.00 0.80 - 0.48 0.48 - 0.32 0.32 - - 1.60

3 Durg 0.43 0.00 0.43 - 0.26 0.26 - 0.17 0.17 - - 0.86

4 Bhilai 0.43 0.00 0.43 - 0.26 0.26 - 0.17 0.17 - - 0.86

5 Rajnandgaon 0.43 0.00 0.43 - 0.26 0.26 - 0.17 0.17 - - 0.86

6 Korba 0.43 0.00 0.43 - 0.26 0.26 - 0.17 0.17 - - 0.86

7 Raigarh 0.43 0.00 0.43 - 0.26 0.26 - 0.17 0.17 - - 0.86

8 Ambikapur 0.43 0.00 0.43 - 0.26 0.26 - 0.17 0.17 - - 0.86

9 Jagdalpur 0.43 0.00 0.43 - 0.26 0.26 - 0.17 0.17 - - 0.86

Total 4.61 0.00 4.61 - 3.25 3.25 2.16 2.16 - - 10.02

33 of 112


Abstract of State Annual Action Plan (SAAP) Consolidated Requirement of State and Share of Each Stakeholder

Table No.

Content

1.1

Breakup of Total MoUD Allocation in AMRUT

1.2.1

Sector Wise Proposed Total Project Fund and Sharing Pattern

1.2.2

Break-up of Total Fund Sharing Pattern

1.3

Use of Funds on Projects: On-going and New

1.4 Plan for Achieving Service Level Benchmarks

34 of 112


35 of 112


Name of State: CHHATTISGARH FY 2015-16 Table 1.1: Breakup of Total MoUD Allocation in AMRUT

(Amount in Cr.) Total Central

funds allocated to State

Allocation of Central funds for

A&OE

Allocation of funds for AMRUT

(Central Share)

Multiply col. 3 by x3 for AMRUT on col.4 (Project

Proposal to be three-times the annual allocation - CA)

Add equal (col.4)

State/ULB share

Total AMRUT annual size (cols.2+4+5)

1 2 3 4 5 6 87.77 8.98 96.75 290.25 290.25 589.48

36 of 112


Name of State: CHHATTISGARH FY 2015-16 Table 1.2.1: Abstract-Sector Wise Proposed Total Project Fund and Sharing Pattern

(Amount in Cr.) Sl.No. Sector No. of Projects Centre State ULB Convergence Others Total

1 Water Supply 27 212.13 137.08 91.38 - - 440.59

2 Sewerage and Septage Management

11 59.73 37.84 25.22 - - 122.79

3 Drainage 0 - - - - - -

4 Urban Transport 0 - - - - - -

5 Others (Parks+Reforms) 28 18.39 3.25 2.16 - - 23.80

6 Grand Total 66 290.25 178.16 118.77 587.18

37 of 112


Name of State: CHHATTISGARH FY 2015-16 Table 1.2.2: Abstract-Break-up of Total Fund Sharing Pattern

(Amount in Cr.) Sl.No. Sector Centre State ULB Convergence Others Total

Mission 14th FC Others Total 14th FC Others Total

1 Water Supply 212.13 - 137.08 137.08 - 91.38 91.38 - - 440.59

2 Sewrage and Septage Management

59.73 - 37.84 37.84 - 25.22 25.22 - - 122.79

3 Draingae - - - - - - - - - -

4 Urban Transport - - - - - - - - - -

5 Others (Parks+Reforms) 18.39 - 3.25 3.25 - 2.16 2.16 - - 23.80

6 Grand Total 290.25 - 178.16 178.16 - 118.77 118.77 - - 587.18

38 of 112


Name of State: CHHATTISGARH FY 2015-16

Table 1.3: Abstract-Use of Funds on Projects: On Going and New (Amount in Cr.)

S.No.

Sector Total Project Investment

Committed Expenditure (if any) from Previous Year

Proposed Spending during Current Financial Year Balance Carry Forward for Next Financial Years

Cent

re

State ULB

Cent

re

State ULB

Cent

re

State ULB 14

th F

C

Oth

ers

Tota

l

14th

FC

Oth

ers

Tota

l

14th

FC

Oth

ers

Tota

l

14th

FC

Oth

ers

Tota

l

14th

FC

Oth

ers

Tota

l 14

th F

C

Oth

ers

Tota

l

1 Water Supply

1169.86 - - - - - - - 212.13 - 137.08 137.08 0.00 91.38 91.38 - - - - - - -

2 Sewerage/Septage Management

764.08 - - - - - - - 59.73 - 37.84 37.84 0.00 25.22 25.22 - - - - - - -

3 Drainage 0.00 - - - - - - - 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - -

4 Urban Transport

0.00 - - - - - - - 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - -

5 Others (Parks + Reform)

63.88 - - - - - - - 18.39 - 3.25 3.25 0.00 2.16 2.16 - - - - - - -

Grand Total 1997.82 - - - - - - - 290.25 - 178.16 178.16 0.00 118.77 118.77 - - - - - - -

39 of 112


Name of State: CHHATTISGARH FY 2015-16 Table 1.4: Abstract- Plan for Achieving Service Level Benchmarks

(Rs. In Cr.) Proposed Priority Projects

Total Project

Cost

Indicator Baseline Annual Target based on Master Plan (Increment from the Baseline Value) FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020

H1 H2 Water Supply

27 Projects

1169.86 1. Household level coverage of direct water supply connections

45.12 - - 9.50 21.30 43.12 54.88

2. Per capita quantum ofwater supplied

98.16 - - 3.00 11.80 31.23 36.84

3. Quality of water supplied 81.14 - - 3.00 7.60 16.30 18.86 Sewerage and Septage Management

11 Projects

764.08 4. Coverage of latrines (individual or community)

69.92 - - 9.6 20.1 30 30.08

5. Coverage of seweragenetwork services

4.67 - - 2 30 78 95.33

6. Efficiency of Collection ofSewerage

6.67 - - 6.8 33.9 85.7 93.33

7. Efficiency in treatment 8.33 - - 23.89 87.34 91.67 Drainage

8. Coverage of storm waterdrainage network

- - - - - - -

Urban Transport 9. Service coverage of urbantransport in the city

- - - - - - -

10. Availability of urbantransport per 1000population

- - - - - - -

40 of 112


State Annual Action Plan (SAAP) derived from SLIPs

Table No. Content

3.1 Master Plan of all projects to achieve universal coverage during the current Mission period based on Table 2.1 (FYs 2105-16 to 2019-20)

3.2 Sector Wise Breakup of Consolidated Investments for each ULB in the State

3.3 ULB Wise Source of Funds for All Sectors

3.4 Year Wise Share of Investments for All Sectors (ULB Wise)

3.5 State level Plan for Achieving Service Level Benchmarks 3.6 State Level Plan of Action for Physical and Financial Progress

41 of 112


Name of State: CHHATTISGARH Current Mission Period 2015-20

Table 3.1: SAAP- Master Plan of all projects to achieve universal coverage during the current Mission period based on Table 2.1 (FYs 2015-16 to 2019-20)

(Amount in Cr.)

Sr.No. Name of ULB (water supply and sewerage)

Total number of projects to achieve universal coverage

Estimated Cost Number of years to achieve universal coverage

1 2 3 4 5 1 Raipur 5 798.29 5

2 Bilaspur 5 267.32 5

3 Durg 4 62.43 5

4 Bhilai 4 251.11 5

5 Rajnandgaon 4 92.83 5

6 Korba 4 219.36 4

7 Raigarh 4 106.44 5

8 Ambikapur 4 52.16 3

9 Jagdalpur 4 84.00 5

Total 38 1933.94 5

42 of 112


Name of State: Chhattisgarh FY2015-16 Table 3.2: SAAP- Sector Wise Breakup of Consolidated Investments for all AMRUT ULBs in the State

(Amount in Cr.)

S.No. Name ofCity

Water Supply

Sewerage and Septage

Management

Drainage Urban Transport

Others ( Parks) Reforms Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 1 Raipur 49.00 10.00 - - 2.40 3.39 64.79

2 Bilaspur 81.84 21.79 - - 1.60 3.39 108.62

3 Durg 35.67 15.00 - - 0.86 1.00 52.53

4 Bhilai 77.04 20.00 - - 0.86 1.00 98.90

5 Rajnandgaon 26.94 12.00 - - 0.86 1.00 40.80

6 Korba 67.12 18.00 - - 0.86 1.00 86.98

7 Raigarh 32.15 10.00 - - 0.86 1.00 44.01

8 Ambikapur 46.16 6.00 - - 0.86 1.00 54.02

9 Jagdalpur 24.67 10.00 - - 0.86 1.00 36.53

Total Project Investments

440.59 122.79 0.00 0.00 10.02 13.78 587.18

A & OE 8.98

Grand Total 596.16

43 of 112


Name of State: CHHATTISGARH FY2016-17 (Amount in Cr.)

Table 3.3:SAAP-ULB Wise Source of Funds for All Sectors (

S.No. Name of City Centre State ULB Convergence Others (e.g. incentive)

Total

14th FC Others Total 14th FC Others Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 Raipur 23.86 0.00 24.56 24.56 16.37 0.00 16.37 - - 64.79

2 Bilaspur 56.01 0.00 31.57 31.57 7.85 13.20 21.05 - - 108.63

3 Durg 26.77 0.00 15.46 15.46 6.33 0.00 6.33 - - 48.55

4 Bhilai 49.95 0.00 29.37 29.37 15.67 3.91 19.58 - - 98.90

5 Rajnandgaon 20.90 0.00 11.94 11.94 4.63 3.33 7.96 - - 40.80

6 Korba 43.99 0.00 25.79 25.79 12.11 10.64 22.75 - - 92.53

7 Raigarh 22.50 0.00 12.90 12.90 4.01 4.59 8.60 - - 44.01

8 Ambikapur 27.51 0.00 15.91 15.91 2.87 6.15 9.02 - - 52.44

9 Jagdalpur 18.76 0.00 10.66 10.66 3.51 3.60 7.11 - - 36.53

Total 290.25 0.00 178.16 178.16 73.35 45.42 118.77 - - 587.17

44 of 112


Name of State:CHHATTISGARH FY2015-16 Table 3.4 : SAAP-Year Wise Share of Investments for All Sectors (ULB Wise) (Amount in Cr.)

S.No Name of City Total Project

Investment

Committed Expenditure (if any)from Previous Year

Proposed Spending during Current Financial Year Balance Carry Forward for Next Financial Years

Cent

re

State ULB Centre State ULB State ULB

14th

FC

Oth

ers

Tota

l

14th

FC

Oth

ers

Tota

l

14th

FC

Oth

ers

Tota

l

14th

FC

Oth

ers

Tota

l

Cent

re

14th

FC

Oth

ers

Tota

l

14th

FC

Oth

ers

Tota

l

1 Raipur 813.68 - - - - - - - 23.86 0.00 24.56 24.56 16.37 0.00 16.37

- - - - - - -

2 Bilaspur 278.71 - - - - - - - 56.01 0.00 31.57 31.57 7.85 13.20 21.05

- - - - - - -

3 Durg 67.73 - - - - - - - 26.77 0.00 15.46 15.46 6.33 0.00 6.33

- - - - - - -

4 Bhilai 256.41 - - - - - - - 49.95 0.00 29.37 29.37 15.67 3.91 19.58

- - - - - - -

5 Rajnandgaon 98.13 - - - - - - - 20.90 0.00 11.94 11.94 4.63 3.33 7.96

- - - - - - -

6 Korba 224.66 - - - - - - - 43.99 0.00 25.79 25.79 12.11 10.64 22.75

- - - - - - -

7 Raigarh 111.74 - - - - - - - 22.50 0.00 12.90 12.90 4.01 4.59 8.60

- - - - - - -

8 Ambikapur 57.46 - - - - - - - 27.51 0.00 15.91 15.91 2.87 6.15 9.02

- - - - - - -

9 Jagdalpur 89.30 - - - - - - - 18.76 0.00 10.66 10.66 3.51 3.60 7.11

- - - - - - -

TOTAL 1997.82 - - - - - - - 290.25 0.00 178.16 178.16 73.35 45.42 118.77 - - - - - - -

45 of 112

Chhattisgarh – AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-16Name of State: CHHATTISGARH FY2015-16

Table 3.5: SAAP-State level Plan for Achieving Service Level Benchmarks (Amount in Cr.)

Proposed Priority Projects

Total Project

Cost

Indicator Baseline Annual Target (Increment from the Baseline Value)

FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 H1 H2

Water Supply 27 Projects 1169.86 1. Household level coverage of direct water

supply connections 45.12 - - 9.50 21.30 43.12 54.88

2. Per capita quantum of water supplied 98.16 - - 3.00 11.80 31.23 36.84 3. Quality of water supplied 81.14 - - 3.00 7.60 16.30 18.86

Sewerage and Sepatage Management 11 Projects 764.08 4. Coverage of latrines (individual or

community) 69.92 - - 9.6 20.1 30 30.08

5. Coverage of sewerage network services 4.67 - - 2 30 78 95.33

6. Efficiency of Collection of Sewerage 6.67 - - 6.8 33.9 85.7 93.33 7. Efficiency in treatment 8.33 - - - 23.89 87.34 91.67

Drainage 8. Coverage of storm water drainage network - - - - - - -

Urban Transport 9. Service coverage of urban transport in thecity - - - - - - -

10. Availability of urban transport per 1000population - - - - - - -

46 of 112


Name of State: CHHATTISGARH FY 2015-16 Table 3.6: SAAP-State level Plan for Action for Physical and Financial Progress

SECTOR: WATER SUPPLY (Amount in Cr.) S.No Name of City Performance indicator Baseline Mission

Target For the Financial Year

For Half Year 1 For Half Year 2

Physical Progress

to be achieved

Funds to be

utilized

Physical Progress to

be achieved

Funds to be utilized

1 Raipur Household level coverage of direct water supply connections 47.00 100 - - DPR

Preparation & Material

Procurement

9.80 Per capita quantum of water supplied 127.00 135 - - Quality of water supplied 98.00 100 - -

2 Bilaspur Household level coverage of direct water supply connections 50.00 100 - - DPR


Procurement


3 Durg Household level coverage of direct water supply connections 53.20 100 - - DPR


Procurement


4 Bhilai Household level coverage of direct water supply connections 30.00 100 - - DPR


Procurement


5 Rajnandgaon Household level coverage of direct water supply connections 53.30 100 - - DPR

Preparation & 5.39

47 of 112


Table 3.6: SAAP-State level Plan for Action for Physical and Financial Progress SECTOR: WATER SUPPLY (Amount in Cr.) S.No Name of City Performance indicator Baseline Mission

Target For the Financial Year


Physical Progress

to be achieved

Funds to be

utilized

Physical Progress to

be achieved

Funds to be utilized

Per capita quantum of water supplied 130.12 135 - - Material Procurement Quality of water supplied 100.00 100 - -

6 Korba Household level coverage of direct water supply connections 21.20 100 - - DPR


Procurement


7 Raigarh Household level coverage of direct water supply connections 38.40 100 - - DPR


Procurement


8 Ambikapur Household level coverage of direct water supply connections 50.90 100 - - DPR


Procurement


9 Jagdalpur Household level coverage of direct water supply connections 62.10 100 - - DPR


Procurement


TOTAL 96.39

48 of 112


Table 3.6: SAAP-State level Plan for Action for Physical and Financial Progress

SECTOR: SEWERAGE AND SAPTAGE (Amount in Cr.)

S.No Name of City Performance indicator Baseline Mission

Target

For the Financial Year


Physical

Progress

to be

achieved

Funds to

be

utilized

Physical

Progress to be

achieved

Funds

to be

utilized

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

1 Raipur

Coverage of latrines 81.70 100 - - DPR Preparation

& Material

Procurement

2.00 Coverage of sewerage network services 0.00 100 - -

Efficiency of Collection of Sewerage 0.00 100 - -

Efficiency in treatment 0.00 100 - -

2 Bilaspur


& Material

Procurement




3 Durg

Coverage of latrines 92.00 100 - -

DPR Preparation

& Material

Procurement

3.00

Coverage of sewerage network services 2.00 100 - -


Efficiency in treatment

0.00 100 - -

49 of 112

Chhattisgarh – AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-16Name of State: CHHATTISGARH FY 2015-16




Target



Physical

Progress

to be

achieved

Funds to

be

utilized

Physical

Progress to be

achieved

Funds

to be

utilized

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

4 Bhilai


& Material

Procurement




5 Rajnandgaon


& Material

Procurement




6 Korba


& Material

Procurement




7 Raigarh Coverage of latrines 25.00 100 - - DPR Preparation

& Material 2.00

Coverage of sewerage network services 0.00 100 - -

50 of 112

Chhattisgarh – AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-16Name of State: CHHATTISGARH FY 2015-16




Target



Physical

Progress

to be

achieved

Funds to

be

utilized

Physical

Progress to be

achieved

Funds

to be

utilized

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Efficiency of Collection of Sewerage 0.00 100 - - Procurement


8 Ambikapur


& Material

Procurement

1.20 Coverage of sewerage network services 0.00 100 - - Efficiency of Collection of Sewerage 0.00 100 - - Efficiency in treatment 0.00 100 - -

9 Jagdalpur


& Material

Procurement

2.00 Coverage of sewerage network services 0.00 100 - - Efficiency of Collection of Sewerage 0.00 100 - - Efficiency in treatment 0.00 100 - -

TOTAL 24.56

51 of 112


Plan of Action for Administrative and

Other Expenses (A&OE)

52 of 112


Name of State: CHHATTISGARH FY 2015-16

Table 4: SAAP - Broad Proposed Allocations for Administrative and Other Expenses (Amount in Cr.)

S.No. Items proposed for A&OE Total Allocation

Committed Expenditure

from previous year (if any)

Proposed spending for

Current Financial year

Balance to Carry Forward

FY 2017

FY 2018

FY 2019 FY 2020

1 Preparation of SLIP and SAAP - 0.00 Total allocation for preparation of SLIP & SAAP is 2.25 Cr, Since Current year's SLIP & SAAP prepared in house

therefore the amount is adjusted in scope of PDMC. Also From next year SLIP & SAAP will be prepared by

PDMC.

2 PDMC 16.84 0.00 6.74 2.53 2.53 2.53 2.53 3 Procuring Third Party Independent Review and

Monitoring Agency 2.81 0.00 0.14 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67

4 Publications (e-Newsletter, guidelines, brochures etc.) 2.81 0.00 0.14 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67

5 Capacity Building and Training - CCBP, if applicable - Others 11.23 0.00 0.56 2.67 2.67 2.67 2.67

6 Reform implementation 5.61 0.00 0.28 2.25 1.68 0.84 0.56 7 Others 5.61 0.00 0.28 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33

Total 44.90 0.00 8.14 10.10 9.54 8.70 8.42

53 of 112


Plan of Action for Reform Implementation

Table No. Content

5.1 Reforms Type, Steps and Target for AMRUT Cities FY 2015-16




5.5 Self- Evaluation for Reporting Progress on Reform Implementation

54 of 112


Table 5.1: SAAP - Reforms Type, Steps and Target for AMRUT Cities FY - 2015 - 16 S. No

Type Milestones Implementation timeline

Target to be set by States in SAAP

Remark (Present Status)

October 2015 to March 2016

April 2016 to Sep 2016

1 E-Governance Digital ULBs Yes 1. Creation of ULB website. 6 months Yes Partially Achieved ,All 09 ULB

having functional website. 2.Publication of e-newsletterDigital India Initiatives

6 months Yes Partially Achieved , All ULBs of Chhattisgarh having centralised e-news letter system.

3. Support Digital India(ducting to be done on PPPmode or by the ULB itself).

6 months Yes With Co-ordination with Chips reform will be achieved within timeline.

2 Constitution and professionalization of municipal cadre

1.Policy for engagement ofinterns in ULBs andimplementation.

12 months Yes Partially Achieved.

3 Augmenting double entry accounting

1.Complete migration todouble entry accountingsystem and obtaining anaudit certificate to the effectfrom FY2012-13 onwards.

12 months Yes Partially accomplished & to be fully achieved within prescribed timeline.

2.Publication of annualfinancial statement onwebsite.

Every year Yes Partially accomplished & to be fully achieved within prescribed timeline.

55 of 112

Chhattisgarh – AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-16 Table 5.1: SAAP - Reforms Type, Steps and Target for AMRUT Cities FY - 2015 - 16 S. No




4 Urban Planning and City level Plans

1.Preparation of Service Level Improvement Plans (SLIP), State Annual Action Plans (SAAP).

6 months Yes Draft SLIP & SAAP prepared.

2.Make action plan to progressively increase Green cover in cities to 15% in 5 years.

6 months Yes To be prepared

5.Develop at least one Children Park every year in AMRUT cities.

Every Year Yes Provision taken in SLIP & SAAP

6.Establish a system for maintaining of parks, playground and recreational areas relying on People Public Private Partnership (PPPP) model.

12 months Yes To be established & Policy for the same in draft stage.

5 Devolution of funds and functions

1.Ensure transfer of 14th FC devolution to ULBs.

6 months Yes

2.Appointment of State Finance Commission (SFC) and making decisions.

12 months Yes Partially Achieved

4.Transfer of all 18 functions to ULBs.

12 months Yes Achieved

6 Review of Building by-laws

1. Revision of building bye laws periodically

12 months Yes To be achieved in prescribed time line.

56 of 112

Chhattisgarh – AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-16Table 5.1: SAAP - Reforms Type, Steps and Target for AMRUT Cities FY - 2015 - 16 S. No




2.Create single windowclearance for all approvals togive building permissions.

12 months Yes To be achieved in prescribed time line.

7 (a)

Municipal tax and fees improvement

1.Atleast 90% coverage, 12 months Yes Partially Achieved, Online GIS based Property Tax and Building Permission system in place.

2.Atleast 90% collection, Yes To be achieved in precribed time line.

3.Make a policy to,periodically revise propertytax, levy charges and otherfees,

Yes To be achieved in precribed time line.

4.Post Demand CollectionBook (DCB) of tax details onthe website,

Yes Partially Achieved, Online GIS based Property Tax and Building Permission system in place.

5. Achieve full potential ofadvertisement revenue bymaking a policy fordestination specific potentialhaving dynamic pricingmodule.

Yes To be accomplished as per milestones within prescribed timeline.

57 of 112

Chhattisgarh – AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-16Table 5.1: SAAP - Reforms Type, Steps and Target for AMRUT Cities FY - 2015 - 16 S. No




7 (b)

Improvement in levy and collection of user charges

1.Adopt a policy on usercharges for individual andinstitutional assessments inwhich a differential rate ischarged for water use andadequate safeguards areincluded to take care of theinterests of the vulnerable,

12 months Yes

To be accomplished as per milestones within prescribed

timeline. 2.Make action plan toreduce water losses to lessthan 20 % and publish on thewebsite,

Yes

3.Separate accounts for usercharges,

Yes

4.Atleast 90% billing Yes 5.Atleast 90% collection. Yes

8 Energy and Water audit 1.Energy (Street lights) andWater Audit (including non-revenue water or lossesaudit),

12 months Yes To be accomplished as per milestones within prescribed timeline.

2.Making STPs and WTPsmore energy efficient,


3.Optimize energyconsumption in street lightsby using energy efficientlights and increasing relianceon renewable energy,


58 of 112

Chhattisgarh – AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-16Table 5.2: SAAP- Reform Type, Steps and Target for AMRUT Cities FY-2016-17.

S. No



Oct., 2015 to Mar., 2016

April to Sept., 2016

Oct., 2016 to Mar., 2017


1 E-Governance Coverage with E-MAAS (from the date of hosting the software)

24 months Partially Achieved , To be Accomplished within prescribed timeline

Registration of Birth, Death and Marriage, Water & Sewerage Charges, Grievance Redressal, Property Tax, Advertisement tax, Issuance of Licenses, Building Permissions, Mutations, Payroll, Pension & e-procurement,

59 of 112

Chhattisgarh – AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-162 Constitution and

professionalization of municipal cadre

1. Establishment of municipal cadre. 24 months Under Process, To be Accomplished within prescribed timeline

2. Cadre linked training. 24 months To be Accomplished within prescribed timeline

3 Augmenting double entry accounting

Appointment of internal auditor. 24 months Partially Completed, To be Accomplished within prescribed timeline


Make a State level policy to implement the parameters given in National Mission for Sustainable Habitat.

24 months Policy will be formulated within the timelines stipulated under the mission

5 Devolution of funds and functions

Implementation of SFC recommendations within timeline.

24 months Partially Completed, To be Accomplished within prescribed timeline

6 Review of Building by-laws

1. State to formulate a policy andaction plan for having a solarroof top in all buildings havingan area greater than 500square meters and all publicbuildings.

24 months Partially Completed, To be Accomplished within prescribed timeline

60 of 112

Chhattisgarh – AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-162. State to formulate a policy and

action plan for having Rainwater harvesting structures inall commercial, publicbuildings and new buildings onplots of 300 sq. meters andabove.

24 months

7 Set-up financial intermediary at state level

Establish and operationalize financial intermediary- pool finance, access external funds, float municipal bonds.

24 months To be Accomplished within prescribed timeline

8 Credit Rating 1.Complete the credit ratings of theULBs


9 Energy and Water audit

4.Give incentives for green buildings(e.g. rebate in property tax or chargesconnected to buildingpermission/development charges)


61 of 112


Table 5.3: SAAP - Reforms Type, Steps and Target for AMRUT Cities FY - 2017 - 18 S. No Type Milestones Implementation timeline Target to be set by States in SAAP

Oct. 2015 to Mar. 2016

April to Sept. 2016

Oct. 2016 to Mar.2017


Oct., 2017 to Mar., 2018


1 E-Governance 1. Personnel Staffmanagement

2. Project management



Establish Urban Development Authorities.


3 Swachh Bharat Mission 1.Elimination of opendefecation,


2. Waste Collection(100%),

To be Accomplished within prescribed timeline

3. Transportation ofWaste (100%).


4. Scientific Disposal(100%).


5. The state will prepare apolicy for Right - Sizingthe number of municipalfunctionaries dependingon, say, population of theULB, generation ofinternal resources andexpenditure on salaries


62 of 112


Table 5.4: SAAP - Reforms Type, Steps and Target for AMRUT Cities FY - 2018 - 19 S. No Type Milestones Implementation

timeline Target to be set by States in SAAP

Oct., 2015 to Mar., 2016


Oct., 2016 to Mar.2017

April to Sept. 2017

Oct. 2017 to Mar., 2018


Oct., 2018 to Mar., 2019



Preparation of Master Plan using GIS.

48 months Partially Achieved , To be Accomplished within prescribed timeline

63 of 112


Annual Capacity Building Plan

64 of 112

Chhattisgarh – AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-16Name of State :-CHHATTISGARH FY 2015-16 Table 7.1 ULB Level Individual Capacity Development Plan

Form 7.1.1 Physical S. No Name of the

Department/ Position

Total number of functionaries (officials/elected representatives)

identified at start

of Mission (2015)

Numbers trained during

last FY(s)

Numbers to be

trained during

the current

FY

Name(s) of Training

Institute for training during the current FY

Cumulative numbers trained after completion of current FY.

1 Elected Representatives

525 0 60 1. State AdministrativeAcademy.

2. State will issue EoI forempanelment of other Training

Partners.

NIL

2 Finance Department

64 0 16

3 Engineering Department

272 0 35

4 Town planning Department

35 0 5

5 Administration Department

261 0 33

TOTAL 1157 0 149

65 of 112


Form 7.1.2 Financial in Rs Lacs

S. No Name of the Department

Cumulative funds

released upto

current FY

Total expenditure

upto current FY

Unspent funds

available from

earlier releases

Funds required for the current FY to train the

number given in Form 7.1.1

1 Elected Representatives

0.00 0.00 0.00 3.30

2 Finance Department

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.88

3 Engineering Department

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.93

4 Town planning Department

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28

5 Administration Department

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.82

TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.20

66 of 112

Chhattisgarh – AMRUT SAAP FY-2015-16Table 7.2 Annual Action Plan for Capacity Building

Name of State CHHATTISGARH Number of Mission cities in AMRUT 9

FY 2015-2016 Form 7.2.1 Fund requirement for Individual Capacity Building at ULB level

S. No Name of the ULB Total numbers to be trained in the current FY department wise

Name of the training

institution (s) identified

Number of training

programmes to be

conducted

Funds required in current

FY El

ecte

d R

epre

sent

ativ

e Fi

nanc

e D

ept.

Engi

neer

ing

Dep

t.

Tow

n pl

anni

ng

Dep

t.

Adm

inis

tra

tion

Dep

t.

Tota

l

in Rs Lacs 1 RAIPUR 70 15 120 20 50 275 1. State

AdministrativeAcademy hasbeen identifiedfor trainingpartner.

2. State willissue EoI forempanelment ofother TrainingPartners.

5 batches of 30

participants each

8.20

2 BILASPUR 66 10 24 5 16 121

3 BHILAI 67 12 40 10 50 179

4 DURG 60 4 19 0 10 93

5 RAJNANDGAON 51 3 9 0 40 103

6 KORBA 67 8 40 0 50 165

7 RAIGARH 48 5 5 0 25 83 8 AMBIKAPUR 48 4 9 0 14 75 9 JAGDALPUR 48 3 6 0 6 63

TOTAL 525 64 272 35 261 1157

67 of 112


Form 7.2.2 Fund requirement for State level activities in Rs Lacs

S. No State level activity Cumulative funds

released up to current

FY

Total expenditure

up to current FY

Unspent funds available from earlier releases

Funds required for the current FY

1 RPMC 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.90

SRPMC/SMMU 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.90

CRPMC/CMMU 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.00

2 UMC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3 Others (Workshops, seminars etc.) which are approved by NIUA

0.00 0.00 0.00 3.50

4 Institutional 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50

TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.90

68 of 112


Form 7.2.3 Total Fund requirement for Capacity Building S. No Funds Requirements

Individual Institutional RPMC & UMC Others Total

1 Total release since start of Mission (2015) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

2 Total utilized – Centre share 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3 Balance available- Centre share 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4 Amount required – Centre share 4.10 0.75 21.45 1.75 28.05

5 Total funds required for capacity building in current FY

8.20 1.50 42.90 3.50 56.10

69 of 112


Form 7.2.4 Details of Institutional Capacity Building

a. Is the State willing to revise their town planning laws and rules to include land pooling?Yes, required revisions are partially completed, detailed revision will be completed within reform implementation timeline.

b. List of ULBs willing to have a credit rating done as the first step to issue bonds?ULBs and state are willing for Credit rating of ULBs. Rating will be completed within reform implementation timeline.

c. Is the State willing to integrate all work done in GIS in order to make GIS useful for decision-making in ULBs?Yes, State completed GIS mapping of all mission cities under GIS based PTIS and BPMS project. State is exploring projects for GIS based decisionmaking process.

d. Is the State willing to take assistance for using land as a fiscal tool in ULBs?Yes, State is exploring fiscal tool for ULBs.

e. Does the State require assistance to professionalize the municipal cadre?Yes. The State is willing to establish an Institute of Governance and Urban Management to impart training and support department and ULBs inResearch and Policy analysis. It needs support from GoI.

f. Does the State require assistance to reduce non-revenue water in ULBs?Yes. State is willing to conduct study and introduce project in NRW sector. It needs support from GoI.

g. Does the State require assistance to improve property tax assessment and collections in ULBs?Yes. State partially completed the GIS based Property Tax Project in mission cities. For proper implementation of this project state needs supportfrom GoI.

h. Does the State require assistance to establish a financial intermediary?Yes.

i. Any other capacity assistance to implement the AMRUT Reform Agenda as set out in these Guidelines?Yes, details shall be furnished by Dec-2015.

70 of 112

Section 6


Citizen & Stakeholders Consultation

71 of 112

Citython : Ward Level Citizen Consultation

72 of 112


73 of 112

74 of 112

75 of 112

76 of 112

77 of 112

78 of 112

79 of 112

80 of 112

81 of 112

82 of 112

83 of 112

84 of 112

85 of 112

86 of 112

87 of 112

88 of 112

89 of 112

90 of 112


91 of 112

92 of 112

93 of 112

94 of 112

95 of 112

96 of 112

97 of 112

98 of 112

99 of 112

100 of 112

101 of 112

102 of 112

103 of 112

104 of 112

105 of 112

106 of 112

107 of 112

108 of 112

109 of 112

110 of 112


111 of 112


State Urban Development Agency, D-Block,Fourth Floor,Capitol Complex,Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh-492002.

112 of 112