statistical abstract fiscal year 2017 - tn.gov · 2019-08-03 · the tennessee department of...
TRANSCRIPT
STATISTICAL ABSTRACT
FISCAL YEAR 2017
Prepared: October 2017
By
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Decision Support: Research and Planning Division
The Tennessee Department of Correction
Fiscal Year 2016 – 2017 Statistical Abstract Coordinated and Published by
Decision Support: Research & Planning Division
Tanya Washington, Director
Dave Elenbaas, Assistant Director Tim Oliver, Program Support Coordinator
To request a copy of this report, or other research information, contact us at
Telephone: 615-253-8187 Email: [email protected]
Visit the TDOC website: www.tn.gov/correction
Pursuant to the State of Tennessee’s policy on nondiscrimination, the Department of Correction does not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, national origin, sex, age, veteran’s status, disability, pregnancy, creed and genetic information in its policies, or in the admission of or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs, services, or activities. Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action inquiries or complaints should be directed to the Department of Correction, EEO/AA Coordinator, Human Resources Office, 3rd Floor Rachel Jackson Building, 320 Sixth Avenue North, Nashville, TN 37243-0465, Telephone 615-253-8026 or TDD (for persons with hearing impairments), 615-532-4423. ADA inquiries or complaints should be directed to the Department of Correction, Human Resources Office, 3rd Floor Rachel Jackson Building, 320 Sixth Avenue North, Nashville, TN 37243-0465, Telephone 615-253-8026 or TDD (for persons with hearing impairments), 615-532-4423.
Table of Contents i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................. i
Budget and Staffing .................................................................................... 1
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION STAFFING ............................................................................ 3 Personnel by Race and Sex: June 30, 2017 .......................................................................................................... 3 Personnel by Race and Sex (Percentages): June 30, 2017 ................................................................................... 3 Personnel by Class: June 30, 2008 - 2017 ............................................................................................................ 4 Full-Time Equivalents (FTE’s) by Division: June 30, 2017 ..................................................................................... 4
CORRECTIONAL FACILITY STAFFING ......................................................................................................... 5 Correctional Officer Series Vacancies: July 1, 2008 - 2017 .................................................................................. 5 Correctional Officer Series Vacancy Rates: July 1, 2008 - 2017 ........................................................................... 5 Correctional Officer Series Vacancies by Classification: June 30, 2017 ............................................................... 5 Authorized Full-Time Equivalents (FTE'S) by Facility: FY 2016 – 2017 ................................................................. 6 Facility Staffing vs. Inmate Average Daily Population: FY 2008 – FY 2017 ........................................................... 6 Correctional Officer Salary Comparisons ............................................................................................................. 7 Correctional Officer Series Turnover Rates by Facility: FY 2017 .......................................................................... 8
COMMUNITY SUPERVISION STAFFING ..................................................................................................... 9 Probation/Parole Officer Series Vacancies: July 1, 2013 - 2017........................................................................... 9 Probation/Parole Officer Vacancy Rates: July 1, 2013 – 2017 ............................................................................. 9 Probation/Parole Officer Vacancies by Classification: June 30, 2017 .................................................................. 9 Probation/Parole Staffing Trends: June 30, 2013 – 2017 .................................................................................... 9 Authorized Community Supervision FTE's by District: FY 2016 - 2017 .............................................................. 10 Community Supervision Turnover Rate: FY 2017 ............................................................................................... 10
TDOC IN THE CONTEXT OF THE STATE BUDGET ..................................................................................... 11 FY 2016 - 2017 Total Budget Recommendations ............................................................................................... 11
Population, Capacity, and Trends.............................................................. 13
TDOC INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY AND INMATE POPULATION ................................................................ 15 Capacity & Population Distribution by Facility: June 30, 2017 .......................................................................... 15 TDOC Operating Capacity Compared to Inmate Population Projections ........................................................... 16 Total Felon Inmate Population (Historical and Projected): FY 2008 – FY 2020 .................................................. 16
FELON POPULATION TRENDS ................................................................................................................. 17 Total Incarcerated Felon Population: June 30, 2017 .......................................................................................... 17 Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Felon Population by Location: FY 2008 – FY 2017 ............................................... 18 Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Felon Population by Sex: FY 2008 – FY 2017 ....................................................... 18 Local Jail Census: FY 2016 - 2017 ...................................................................................................................... 19
FELON INMATE DEMOGRAPHICS: AGE, SEX, AND RACE ........................................................................ 20 Felon Inmate Population by Age (Systemwide): June 30, 2017 ......................................................................... 20 Felon Inmate Population by Age and Location: June 30, 2017 .......................................................................... 20 Felon Inmate Population by Sex and Race (Systemwide): June 30, 2017 ......................................................... 21 Felon Inmate Population by Sex, Race, and Location: June 30, 2017 ............................................................... 21
ii 2017 Statistical Abstract
SENTENCE LENGTH ................................................................................................................................. 22 Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense and Location ............................................................................. 22 Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense: Felon Admissions ..................................................................... 23 Average Time Served by Primary Offense: Releases by Location ...................................................................... 24 Average Time Served by Primary Offense: Releases by Type ............................................................................ 25
INMATE ADMISSIONS AND RELEASES .................................................................................................... 26 Annual Admissions and Releases ....................................................................................................................... 26 Felon Inmate Admissions by Type and Location: FY 2016 - 2017 ...................................................................... 26 Felon Inmate Releases by Type and Location: FY 2016 – 2017 .......................................................................... 26 Felon Inmate Admissions by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2016 – 2017 ..................................................................... 27 Felon Inmate Releases by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2016 – 2017 ......................................................................... 27 Inmate Admissions by Geographical Region: FY 2016 - 2017 ............................................................................ 28 Inmate Admissions by County of Conviction: FY 2016 – 2017 ........................................................................... 29 Felon Inmate Population by County of Conviction: June 30, 2017 .................................................................... 30 Total Community Supervision Felon Population: June 30, 2017 ........................................................................ 31 Fiscal Year-End Community Supervision Felon Population: FY 2008 – FY 2017 ................................................. 31 Parole and Probation Population by District: June 30, 2017 ............................................................................. 31
COMMUNITY SUPERVISION DEMOGRAPHICS: AGE, SEX, AND RACE ..................................................... 32 Community Supervision Population by Age (Systemwide): June 30, 2017 ........................................................ 32 Community Supervision Population by Age & Type of Supervision: June 30, 2017........................................... 32 Community Supervision Population by Race & Sex (Systemwide): June 30, 2017 ............................................ 33 Community Supervision Population by Sex, Race, and Type of Supervision ..................................................... 33
COMMUNITY SUPERVISION ADMISSIONS AND RELEASES ..................................................................... 34 Community Supervision Admissions and Releases by Location: FY 2016 - 2017 ............................................... 34 Community Supervision Releases by Type and Location: FY 2016 - 2017 ......................................................... 34 Community Supervision Admissions by Age, Race and Sex: FY 2016-2017 ....................................................... 35 Community Supervision Releases by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2016-2017........................................................... 35
Offender Accountability, Programs & Services ......................................... 37
COMMUNITY SERVICE ............................................................................................................................ 39 Total Hours and Estimated Value of Community Service Work - Inmate .......................................................... 39 Total Hours and Estimated Value of Community Service Work – Community Supervision ............................... 39
EDUCATIONAL, REHABILITATIVE, AND JOB PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 40 Inmate Program Assignments: June 30, 2017 ................................................................................................... 40 Inmate Educational Enrollment: FY 2016 – 2017 ............................................................................................... 41 Test Results: FY 2016 – 2017 .............................................................................................................................. 41 High School Equivalency & Vocational Certificates: FY 2008-2017 .................................................................... 41
DRUG SCREENS ....................................................................................................................................... 42 Inmate Drug Screens: FY 2016 – 2017 ............................................................................................................... 42 Positive Drug Test Averages by Quarter: FY 2015 – FY 2017 ............................................................................. 42
INMATE HEALTH AND BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES ......................................................................... 43 Number of Inmate Patients in Individual Chronic Care Clinics .......................................................................... 43 Inmate Hospital Admissions: Fiscal Year 2013 – 2017 ....................................................................................... 43 Telehealth Encounters Monthly Average: Fiscal Year 2013 - 2017 .................................................................... 44 Inmate Mental Health Patients for Levels of Care II, III, and IV ......................................................................... 44
Table of Contents iii
Demographics .......................................................................................... 45 Tennessee Department of Correction Facilities and Offices .............................................................................. 47
CORRECTIONAL FACILITY DEMOGRAPHICS ............................................................................................ 48 Prison Security Designations: June 30, 2017 ...................................................................................................... 48 Inmate Population Custody Levels: June 30, 2017 ............................................................................................. 48 Average Daily Population by Facility: FY 2016 – 2017 ....................................................................................... 49 Facility Inmate Populations by Age: June 30, 2017 ............................................................................................ 49 Facility Inmate Populations by Race and Sex: June 30, 2017 ............................................................................. 50 Facility Inmate Populations by Primary Offense: June 30, 2017 ........................................................................ 50
CORRECTIONAL FACILITY INCIDENTS ...................................................................................................... 51 Incidents by Type and Quarter: FY 2016 – 2017 ................................................................................................ 51 TDOC Incident Summary by Incident Type and Facility: FY 2016 – 2017 ........................................................... 52 TDOC Incident Summary by Incident Type and Facility: FY 2016 – 2017 (cont.) ............................................... 53 TDOC Incident Summary by Incident Type and Facility: FY 2016 – 2017 (cont.) ............................................... 54
COMMUNITY SUPERVISION DEMOGRAPHICS ........................................................................................ 55 Parolee Populations by District and Age: June 30, 2017 .................................................................................... 55 Parolee Populations by District by Race and Sex: June 30, 2017 ....................................................................... 55 Probationer Populations by District and Age: June 30, 2017 ............................................................................. 56 Probationer Populations by District by Race and Sex: June 30, 2017 ................................................................ 56 Probation/Parole Populations by Level of Supervision: June 30, 2017 .............................................................. 57 Probation/Parole Supervision Standards ........................................................................................................... 57 Program Supervision Unit (PSU) ........................................................................................................................ 58
STATISTICAL ABSTRACT USER’S GUIDE ................................................................................................... 60 Population, Capacity, & Trends .......................................................................................................................... 60 Offender Accountability, Programs & Services .................................................................................................. 60 Demographics .................................................................................................................................................... 61
Budget and Staffing
Budget & Staffing 3
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION STAFFING The Central Office Human Resources section provides technical assistance and advice and ensures compliance with Civil Service Rules, EEOC/Affirmative Action, state law, and policies. This section also implements and monitors personnel-related programs such as employee relations, recruitment and retention, training, performance evaluations, employee transactions, and employee benefits, including accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Personnel by Race and Sex: June 30, 2017
Personnel by Race and Sex (Percentages): June 30, 2017
Male Female TotalWhite 2,748 1,428 4,176Black 574 915 1,489
American Indian 14 8 22Asian 8 8 16
Hispanic 51 32 83Other 31 40 71Total 3,426 2,431 5,857
4 2017 Statistical Abstract
Personnel by Class: June 30, 2008 - 2017
Full-Time Equivalents (FTE’s) by Division: June 30, 2017
Personnel Type FY16-17 FY15-16 FY14-15 FY13-14 FY12-13 FY11-12 FY10-11 FY09-10 FY08-09 FY07-08Officials/ Administrators 3.1% 2.6% 2.5% 2.3% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.1% 2.1% 2.3%
Security 54.7% 56.3% 54.1% 56.5% 54.8% 65.3% 65.4% 64.7% 65.3% 64.0%Maintenance 1.1% 2.9% 3.3% 3.4% 3.3% 4.0% 4.1% 4.4% 4.4% 4.3%Professional 30.6% 28.4% 29.5% 27.5% 28.5% 16.6% 16.5% 16.9% 16.1% 16.5%Skilled 1.8% 1.9% 1.9% 1.8% 1.7% 2.0% 1.9% 1.9% 2.0% 2.1%Clerical 6.7% 6.4% 6.9% 6.6% 6.7% 6.2% 6.2% 6.5% 6.8% 7.4%Technical 1.7% 1.5% 1.8% 1.8% 2.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.6% 3.4% 3.4%
Division Number of FTE's % of TotalFacilities 4,558 79.6%Community Supervision 895 15.6%Central Office 272 4.8%Total 5,725 100%
Budget & Staffing 5
CORRECTIONAL FACILITY STAFFING
Correctional Officer Series Vacancies: July 1, 2008 - 2017
Correctional Officer Series Vacancy Rates: July 1, 2008 - 2017
Correctional Officer Series Vacancies by Classification: June 30, 2017
As of: Vacant Positions Total Positions Vacancy Rate7/1/2017 375 3,591 10.4%7/1/2016 246 3,476 7.1%7/1/2015 335 3,479 9.6%7/1/2014 266 3,712 7.2%7/1/2013 308 3,705 8.3%7/1/2012 135 3,408 4.0%7/1/2011 125 3,389 3.7%7/1/2010 112 3,360 3.3%7/1/2009 143 3,360 4.3%7/1/2008 173 3,491 5.0%
PositionsCorrectional
Officer
Correctional Clerical Officer Corporal Sergeant Lieutenant Captain TOTAL
Total 2,611 132 455 257 76 60 3,591Filled 2,285 123 427 247 74 60 3,216
6 2017 Statistical Abstract
Authorized Full-Time Equivalents (FTE'S) by Facility: FY 2016 – 2017
Correctional facility staffing trends are presented in the below graph. Data is included on total facility staffing (expressed in FTEs or full time equivalents) and uniformed security staffing levels as compared to the average daily inmate population. Between FY 2008 and FY 2017:
Inmate average daily population increased by 12.9%. Total facility staffing decreased by 8.9%. Total uniformed security staffing decreased by 27.9%.
Facility Staffing vs. Inmate Average Daily Population: FY 2008 – FY 2017
Facility Security Non-Security TotalBledsoe County Correctional Complex 510 166 676DeBerry Special Needs Facility 254 139 393Mark Luttrell Transition Center 94 54 148Morgan County Correctional Complex 519 154 673Northeast Correctional Complex 316 154 470Northwest Correctional Complex 381 169 550Riverbend Maximum Security Institution 261 52 313Tennessee Correction Academy 1 71 72Tennessee Prison for Women 158 57 215Turney Center Industrial Complex 257 108 365West Tennessee State Penitentiary 120 563 683
Facility Subtotal 2,871 1,687 4,558
Central Office 0 272 272
Total 2,871 1,959 4,830
% of Total 59% 41% 100%
Budget & Staffing 7
Correctional Officer Salary Comparisons The ability to recruit and retain qualified staff continues to be a concern for the Department. Because salary levels are critical in recruitment and retention of staff, the Department closely monitors other correctional and law enforcement agencies to compare its salaries with those offered by agencies performing similar functions. Average Starting Salaries: Neighboring States
When compared to neighboring state correctional departments, TDOC ranks 7th in the average starting salary for correctional officers. Of the 15 states participating in the Southern Legislative Conference (SLC), Tennessee places 10th – with an average starting salary slightly below the SLC average of $28,264. Source: Southern Legislative Conference – July 2016.
Average Starting Salaries: Federal & TN Counties
TDOC also ranks low when compared to other correctional and law enforcement agencies located near some of our facilities. These are some of the agencies with whom we compete directly in the recruitment and retention of uniformed staff.
State DOC
Average Starting Salary
North Carolina $30,866
Missouri $30,240
Virginia $29,596
Georgia $29,488
Alabama $28,517
Arkansas
$28,480
Tennessee $27,329
Kentucky Mississippi
$26,400
$24,903
Federal Bureau of Prisons $40,511
Shelby County Sheriff’s Office
$36,813
Davidson County Sheriff’s Office $39,362
Hamilton County Sheriff’s Office Knox County Sheriff’s Office
$32,090 $31,429
8 2017 Statistical Abstract In FY 2017, the correctional officer turnover rate was 36.7% systemwide. The turnover rate includes all officers leaving positions, but excludes those occurring when an employee is transferred or promoted within the TDOC system in the correctional or probation/parole officer series.
Correctional Officer Series Turnover Rates by Facility: FY 2017
Correctional Officer Series Turnover Rate
Bledsoe County Correctional Complex BCCX 38.5%
DeBerry Special Needs Facility DSNF 33.8%
Mark Luttrell Transition Center MLTC 31.0%
Morgan County Correctional Complex MCCX 29.4%
Northeast Correctional Complex NECX 22.9%
Northwest Correctional Complex NWCX 42.3%
Riverbend Maximum Security Institution RMSI 43.4%
Tennessee Prison for Women TPFW 62.0%
Turney Center Industrial Complex TCIX 49.3%
West Tennessee State Penitentiary WTSP 29.7%
Systemwide 36.7%
Institution
Budget & Staffing 9
COMMUNITY SUPERVISION STAFFING
Probation/Parole Officer Series Vacancies: July 1, 2013 - 2017
Probation/Parole Officer Vacancy Rates: July 1, 2013 – 2017
Probation/Parole Officer Vacancies by Classification: June 30, 2017
Probation/Parole Staffing Trends: June 30, 2013 – 2017
Offender population source: TN Felon Population Update (June 2017)
Positions PPO2 PPO3 TOTAL Vacancy Rate
Total 646 151 797 9.8% Filled 579 140 719
As of: Vacant Positions Total Positions Vacancy Rate7/1/2017 78 797 9.8%7/1/2016 33 748 4.4%7/1/2015 36 754 4.8%7/1/2014 41 790 5.2%7/1/2013 34 793 4.3%
10 2017 Statistical Abstract
Authorized Community Supervision FTE's by District: FY 2016 - 2017
Community Supervision Turnover Rate: FY 2017
Security Non-Security TotalDistrict 10 62 9 71District 20 63 9 72District 21 42 11 53District 30 87 9 96District 31 33 3 36District 40 48 4 52District 41 36 5 41District 42 46 5 51District 50 54 8 62District 51 28 6 34District 60 41 7 48District 61 54 11 65District 70 32 9 41District 71 27 4 31District 72 52 5 57District 80 39 5 44District 81 39 2 41
Total Districts 783 112 895% of Total 87% 13% 100%
Community Supervision District
Probation/Parole Officer Turnover Rate
District 10 10.9%District 20 14.3%District 21 15.8%District 30 13.9%District 31 13.8%District 40 22.0%District 41 3.3%District 42 30.0%District 50 8.5%District 51 25.0%District 60 20.0%District 61 4.3%District 70 18.5%District 71 31.8%District 72 31.1%District 80 8.8%District 81 8.6%
Systemwide 15.6%
Budget & Staffing 11
TDOC IN THE CONTEXT OF THE STATE BUDGET
FY 2016 - 2017 Total Budget Recommendations By Function of Government
The State of Tennessee’s budget included $33.1 billion in recommended funding allocated by “functional area”. Total funding budget for the Department of Correction in FY 2017 was $975,506,000.
Population, Capacity, and Trends
Population, Capacity, & Trends 15
.
TDOC INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY AND INMATE POPULATION
Capacity & Population Distribution by Facility: June 30, 2017
GENERAL PURPOSE FACILITIESBledsoe County Correctional Complex (BCCX) - Female 300 294 298 99.3% 101.4%Hardeman County Correctional Center (HCCF) 2,100 1,976 1,992 94.9% 100.8%Mark Luttrell Transitional Center (MLTC) 454 445 239 52.6% 53.7%Northeast Correctional Complex (NECX) 1,880 1,842 1,765 93.9% 95.8%Northwest Correctional Complex (NWCX) 2,436 2,387 2,362 97.0% 99.0%South Central Correctional Facility (SCCF) 1,700 1,642 1,650 97.1% 100.5%Trousdale Turner Correctional Complex (TTCC) 2,672 2,619 2,514 94.1% 96.0%Turney Center Industrial Complex (TCIX) 1,734 1,699 1,616 93.2% 95.1%Whiteville Correctional Facility (WCFA) 1,619 1,505 1,500 92.6% 99.7%West Tennessee State Penitentiary (WTSP) - Female 1,024 993 782 76.4% 78.8%SUB-TOTAL 15,919 15,402 14,718 92.5% 95.6%CLASSIFICATION FACILITIESBledsoe County Correctional Complex (BCCX) - Male 2,239 2,194 2,185 97.6% 99.6%Tennessee Prison for Women (TPFW) 817 801 782 95.7% 97.6%SUB-TOTAL 3,056 2,995 2,967 97.1% 99.1%SPECIAL PURPOSE FACILITIESDeBerry Special Needs Facility (DSNF) 854 786 667 78.1% 84.9%SUB-TOTAL 854 786 667 78.1% 84.9%HIGH SECURITY FACILITIESMorgan County Correctional Complex (MCCX) 2,262 2,194 2,156 95.3% 98.3%Riverbend Maximum Security Institution (RMSI) 808 784 788 97.5% 100.5%West Tennessee State Penitentiary (WTSP) - Male 974 945 929 95.4% 98.3%SUB-TOTAL 4,044 3,923 3,873 95.8% 98.7%TOTALS 23,873 23,106 22,225 93.1% 96.2%Source: TDOC Population Overview Report.
INSTITUTIONTotal Active
Beds Available
TDOC Operating Capacity
Assigned Count as of
6/30/2017
Population as a Percent of
Available Beds
Operating Capacity
16 2017 Statistical Abstract
TDOC Operating Capacity Compared to Inmate Population Projections
Total Felon Inmate Population (Historical and Projected): FY 2008 – FY 2020
Fiscal Year End June 30th
Operating Capacity
Projected Population
Unmet Bed
Demand2018 23,106 29,630 6,5242019 23,106 29,907 6,8012020 23,106 30,215 7,109
Population, Capacity, & Trends 17
.
FELON POPULATION TRENDS
The felon population data included in this Statistical Abstract is from the Tennessee Offender Management Information System (TOMIS) unless otherwise stated. Data from other sources may vary from TOMIS due to the time delay in the TOMIS data entry process. The data on this page and the next page are from TDOC monthly population reports. Over the past 10 fiscal years (2008 – 2017), the incarcerated felon population (including TDOC backup and locally sentenced felons) has increased 11.7% (from 26,998 to 30,161). The male and female felon population increased 8.4% (from 24,885 to 26,975) and 58.0% (from 2,017 to 3,186) respectively during this same period. During the past fiscal year, the total incarcerated felon population increased from 29,362 in June 2016 to 30,161 in June 2017, an increase of 2.7%. The male felon population increased 2.1% and the female felon population increased 8.3% during FY 2017.
Total Incarcerated Felon Population: June 30, 2017
County/Local Jails Locally Sentenced 3,380 TDOC Backup 4,556 TDOC Prisons 22,225
TOTAL 30,161 Source: Tennessee Felon Population Update
18 2017 Statistical Abstract
Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Felon Population by Location: FY 2008 – FY 2017
Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Felon Population by Sex: FY 2008 – FY 2017
Population, Capacity, & Trends 19
.
Local Jail Census: FY 2016 - 2017
JULY
AUG
SEPT
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUNE
29,18
028
,918
28,52
228
,357
27,69
127
,245
28,14
328
,186
28,82
529
,120
29,09
429
,369
TDOC
Bac
kup
4,60
04,
436
4,22
44,
260
4,37
24,
368
4,49
24,
486
4,35
14,
491
4,49
24,
556
Loca
l Felo
ns3,
756
3,77
33,
799
3,72
43,
590
3,37
03,
429
3,41
83,
484
3,60
43,
443
3,38
0Ot
her C
onvic
ted F
elons
632
531
581
659
640
628
773
657
734
602
760
765
Conv
icted
Misd
emea
nant
s4,
748
4,71
94,
990
4,70
74,
709
4,38
44,
704
4,90
95,
244
5,14
35,
081
5,36
2Fe
dera
l & O
ther
s89
381
378
570
673
069
781
480
784
0
8
02
847
839
Pre-
trial
Deta
inees
Felon
y9,
861
9,78
09,
651
10,0
039,
638
9,64
89,
574
9,42
19,
648
9,69
09,
809
9,82
7Mi
sdem
eana
nt4,
690
4,86
64,
492
4,29
84,
012
4,15
04,
357
4,48
84,
524
4,78
84,
662
4,64
0
JULY
AUG
SEPT
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUNE
TDOC
Bac
kup
15.8
%15
.3%
14.8
%15
.0%
15.8
%16
.0%
16.0
%15
.9%
15.1
%15
.4%
15.4
%15
.5%
Loca
l Felo
ns12
.9%
13.0
%13
.3%
13.1
%13
.0%
12.4
%12
.2%
12.1
%12
.1%
12.4
%11
.8%
11.5
%Ot
her C
onvic
ted F
elons
2.2%
1.8%
2.0%
2.3%
2.3%
2.3%
2.7%
2.3%
2.5%
2.1%
2.6%
2.6%
Conv
icted
Misd
emea
nant
s16
.3%
16.3
%17
.5%
16.6
%17
.0%
16.1
%16
.7%
17.4
%18
.2%
17.7
%17
.5%
18.3
%Fe
dera
l & O
ther
s3.
1%2.
8%2.
8%2.
5%2.
6%2.
6%2.
9%2.
9%2.
9%2.
8%2.
9%2.
9%
Pre-
trial
Deta
inees
Felon
y33
.8%
33.8
%33
.8%
35.3
%34
.8%
35.4
%34
.0%
33.4
%33
.5%
33.3
%33
.7%
33.5
%Mi
sdem
eana
nt16
.1%
16.8
%15
.7%
15.2
%14
.5%
15.2
%15
.5%
15.9
%15
.7%
16.4
%16
.0%
15.8
%
Loca
l Jail
Cen
sus:
FY
2016
- 20
17
Tota
l Jail
Pop
ulatio
n
Perc
enta
ge of
Jail
Popu
lation
Sour
ce: T
DOC
Jail S
umm
ary R
epor
t as o
f Jun
e 30
, 201
7
20 2017 Statistical Abstract
FELON INMATE DEMOGRAPHICS: AGE, SEX, AND RACE
Felon Inmate Population by Age (Systemwide): June 30, 2017
Felon Inmate Population by Age and Location: June 30, 2017
65+ 549 2.5% 21 0.4% 16 0.6% 586 1.9%60-64 648 2.9% 75 1.3% 42 1.5% 765 2.5%55-59 1,197 5.4% 185 3.3% 93 3.2% 1,475 4.8%50-54 1,707 7.7% 313 5.5% 156 5.4% 2,176 7.1%45-49 2,357 10.7% 488 8.6% 208 7.3% 3,053 10.0%40-44 2,825 12.8% 703 12.4% 253 8.8% 3,781 12.3%35-39 3,624 16.4% 1,030 18.1% 398 13.9% 5,052 16.5%30-34 3,680 16.6% 1,130 19.9% 505 17.6% 5,315 17.3%25-29 3,556 16.1% 1,134 19.9% 581 20.3% 5,271 17.2%20-24 1,874 8.5% 577 10.1% 571 19.9% 3,022 9.9%18-19 75 0.3% 27 0.5% 36 1.3% 138 0.5%<18 12 0.1% 1 0.0% 1 0.0% 14 0.0%Unknown 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 5 0.2% 6 0.0%TOTAL 22,104 100% 5,685 100% 2,865 100% 30,654 100%Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System
TDOC INHOUSE % TDOC
BACKUP % LOCAL FELON % SYSTEMWIDE %
Population, Capacity, & Trends 21
.
Felon Inmate Population by Sex and Race (Systemwide): June 30, 2017
Felon Inmate Population by Sex, Race, and Location: June 30, 2017
MaleBlack 9,072 44.8% 1,148 25.1% 1,610 64.4% 11,830White 10,620 52.5% 3,358 73.4% 824 33.0% 14,802Asian 66 0.3% 8 0.2% 4 0.2% 78Hispanic 458 2.3% 59 1.3% 58 2.3% 575Native American 28 0.1% 4 0.1% 2 0.1% 34Unknown 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 0.0% 2
Total Male 20,244 100.0% 4,578 100.0% 2,499 100.0% 27,321
FemaleBlack 419 22.5% 104 9.4% 124 33.9% 647White 1,410 75.8% 1,001 90.4% 235 64.2% 2,646Asian 5 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 6Hispanic 18 1.0% 1 0.1% 6 1.6% 25Native American 8 0.4% 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 9Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0
Total Female 1,860 100.0% 1,107 100.0% 366 100.0% 3,333
TOTAL 22,104 72.1% 5,685 18.5% 2,865 9.3% 30,654Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System
TDOC % Backup % Local % Systemwide
22 2017 Statistical Abstract
SENTENCE LENGTH
Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense and Location FY 2016 - 2017
NU
MB
ER
% O
FA
VE
RA
GE
NU
MB
ER
% O
FA
VE
RA
GE
NU
MB
ER
% O
FA
VE
RA
GE
NU
MB
ER
% O
FA
VE
RA
GE
OF
TDO
CS
EN
TEN
CE
OF
TDO
CS
EN
TEN
CE
OF
LOC
ALL
YS
EN
TEN
CE
OF
SY
STE
M -
SE
NTE
NC
EP
RIM
AR
Y O
FFE
NS
E G
RO
UP
OFF
EN
DE
RS
INH
OU
SE
(YE
AR
S)
OFF
EN
DE
RS
BA
CK
UP
(YE
AR
S)
OFF
EN
DE
RS
SE
NTE
NC
ED
(YE
AR
S)
OFF
EN
DE
RS
WID
E(Y
EA
RS
)
H
omic
ide
M
urde
r 3,
973
17.9
7%27
.96
270.
47%
20.5
25
0.17
%5.
804,
005
13.0
7%27
.81
N
eglig
ent M
ansl
augh
ter
90.
04%
6.11
40.
07%
2.75
30.
10%
3.67
160.
05%
4.81
K
idna
ppin
g28
81.
30%
19.1
616
0.28
%6.
097
0.24
%4.
5731
11.
01%
18.1
1
Sex
Offe
nses
Fo
rcib
le2,
736
12.3
8%25
.75
921.
62%
8.66
291.
01%
5.68
2,85
79.
32%
24.9
8
Non
-For
cibl
e12
80.
58%
8.85
550.
97%
4.17
170.
59%
3.45
200
0.65
%7.
10
Ass
ault
Agg
rava
ted
Ass
ault
2,85
512
.92%
15.6
750
58.
88%
6.39
424
14.8
0%5.
083,
784
12.3
4%13
.24
Oth
er A
ssau
lt40
0.18
%5.
6364
1.13
%2.
4418
0.63
%3.
8312
20.
40%
3.69
A
rson
102
0.46
%15
.42
190.
33%
10.8
96
0.21
%5.
0812
70.
41%
14.2
5
Bur
glar
y1,
813
8.20
%10
.41
900
15.8
3%5.
6051
217
.87%
4.78
3,22
510
.52%
8.17
F
orge
ry/F
raud
293
1.33
%7.
8328
34.
98%
3.74
963.
35%
3.24
672
2.19
%5.
45
Lar
ceny
/The
ft1,
018
4.61
%8.
8677
613
.65%
4.49
285
9.95
%3.
912,
079
6.78
%6.
54
Rob
bery
Agg
rava
ted
Rob
bery
2,38
910
.81%
17.5
715
52.
73%
11.8
461
2.13
%7.
222,
605
8.50
%16
.98
All
Oth
er R
obbe
ry61
72.
79%
9.95
146
2.57
%6.
6512
64.
40%
5.57
889
2.90
%8.
78
D
rug
Offe
nses
Coc
aine
1,
517
6.86
%14
.79
328
5.77
%9.
8014
65.
10%
6.73
1,99
16.
50%
13.3
8
O
ther
Dru
g O
ffens
es2,
566
11.6
1%10
.87
1,36
524
.01%
6.39
335
11.6
9%5.
184,
266
13.9
2%8.
99
V
ehic
ular
Veh
icul
ar H
omic
ide/
DU
I18
40.
83%
16.3
028
0.49
%8.
863
0.10
%9.
6721
50.
70%
15.2
4
All
Oth
er V
ehic
ular
520.
24%
6.19
631.
11%
3.53
100.
35%
3.14
125
0.41
%4.
60
0
C
/S/F
Per
son
268
1.21
%20
.35
150.
26%
13.8
35
0.17
%6.
7028
80.
94%
19.7
7
C
/S/F
Pro
perty
970.
44%
9.52
571.
00%
5.41
220.
77%
4.93
176
0.57
%7.
61
C
/S/F
Soc
ieta
l/Dru
gs17
50.
79%
13.8
372
1.27
%6.
3223
0.80
%4.
8927
00.
88%
11.0
7
E
scap
e8
0.04
%6.
5013
0.23
%3.
853
0.10
%5.
3324
0.08
%4.
92
A
ll O
ther
95
44.
32%
7.74
702
12.3
5%3.
4925
18.
76%
3.49
1,90
76.
22%
5.61
U
nsen
tenc
ed22
0.10
%0
0.00
%47
816
.68%
500
1.63
%
0
TOTA
L22
,104
100%
16.1
35,
685
100%
5.89
2,86
510
0%4.
0130
,654
100%
12.8
5
Sen
tenc
e Ty
pe
D
eath
600.
82%
N/A
00.
00%
N/A
00.
00%
N/A
600.
68%
N/A
L
ife2,
271
30.8
6%N
/A7
0.66
%N
/A0
0.00
%N
/A2,
278
26.0
0%N
/A
8
5%4,
851
65.9
3%24
.57
615.
76%
15.2
25
1.45
%7.
714,
917
56.1
2%24
.44
1
-2 Y
ears
176
2.39
%1.
9399
193
.58%
1.79
340
98.5
5%1.
781,
507
17.2
0%1.
80
* 2,
338
(incl
udin
g 7
lifer
s in
Bac
kup)
offe
nder
s w
ith s
ente
nces
of d
eath
(60)
, and
life
(2,2
78) a
re in
clud
ed in
the
TDO
C c
ount
s; h
owev
er, t
hese
offe
nder
s ar
e no
t inc
lude
d in
cal
cula
tion
Felo
ny In
mat
e P
opul
atio
n:
Ave
rage
Tot
al S
ente
nce
Leng
th b
y P
rimar
y O
ffens
e: F
Y 2
016
- 201
7TD
OC
INH
OU
SE
TDO
C B
AC
KU
PLO
CA
LLY
SE
NTE
NC
ED
SY
STE
MW
IDE
OTHER
of a
vera
ge s
ente
nce
leng
ths.
PERSON PROPERTY SOCIETAL
Population, Capacity, & Trends 23
.
Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense: Felon Admissions FY 2017 - 2017
Hom
icid
e
Mur
der
224
2.09
%23
.37
60.
34%
5.17
230
1.85
%22
.67
Ne
glig
ent M
ansl
augh
ter
80.
07%
5.75
50.
29%
2.80
130.
10%
4.62
Kidn
appi
ng42
0.39
%10
.314
0.80
%4.
9356
0.45
%8.
94Se
x O
ffen
ses
Fo
rcib
le38
43.
59%
14.2
539
2.23
%3.
6142
33.
40%
13.2
7
Non-
Forc
ible
101
0.94
%4.
2520
1.14
%3.
0012
10.
97%
4.04
Ass
ault
Agg
rava
ted
Ass
ault
1028
9.61
%8.
0129
316
.74%
4.29
1,32
110
.61%
7.18
Oth
er A
ssau
lt12
11.
08%
2.89
221.
08%
2.23
143
1.15
%2.
79
Ars
on38
0.36
%8.
117
0.40
%4.
7145
0.36
%7.
58Bu
rgla
ry1,
505
14.0
7%6.
1536
320
.74%
3.98
1,86
815
.01%
5.73
Forg
ery/
Frau
d49
04.
58%
3.87
724.
11%
2.73
562
4.52
%3.
73La
rcen
y/Th
eft
1,30
712
.22%
4.63
273
15.6
0%2.
821,
580
12.6
9%4.
32Ro
bber
y
A
ggra
vate
d Ro
bber
y41
33.
86%
13.1
823
1.31
%5.
7443
63.
50%
12.7
9
A
ll Oth
er R
obbe
ry31
42.
94%
7.27
995.
66%
5.15
413
3.32
%6.
76
Drug
Off
ense
s
C
ocai
ne
592
5.53
%10
.95
814.
63%
6.15
673
5.41
%10
.37
Oth
er D
rug
Off
ense
s2,
352
21.9
9%6.
9217
39.
89%
4.09
2,52
520
.29%
6.73
Veh
icul
ar
Veh
icul
ar H
omic
ide/
DUI
500.
47%
10.4
21
0.06
%10
.00
510.
41%
10.4
2
A
ll Oth
er V
ehic
ular
122
1.14
%2.
9810
0.57
%2.
2513
21.
06%
2.93
C/S/
F Pe
rson
*50
0.47
%12
.41
40.
23%
3.00
540.
43%
11.7
1C/
S/F
Prop
erty
*92
0.86
%5.
1137
2.11
%4.
2912
91.
04%
4.87
C/S/
F So
ciet
al/D
rugs
*13
11.
22%
7.13
211.
20%
3.50
152
1.22
%6.
63Es
cape
260.
24%
2.88
10.
06%
4.00
270.
22%
2.93
All O
ther
13
0712
.22%
3.80
186
10.6
3%2.
711,
493
11.9
9%3.
67Un
know
n0
0.00
%0
0.00
%0
0.00
%
TOTA
L***
10,6
9710
0%7.
001,
750
100%
3.83
12,4
4710
0%6.
55
Sent
ence
Typ
e
D
eath
00.
00%
N/A
00.
00%
N/A
00.
00%
N/A
L
ife85
0.79
%N/
A0
0.00
%N/
A85
0.68
%N/
A
85%
437
18.9
2%18
.92
10.
06%
7.20
438
3.52
%18
.89
1
-2 Y
ears
2,04
319
.10%
1.81
508
29.0
3%1.
762,
551
20.4
9%1.
80
* C
/S/F
refe
rs to
non
-sub
stan
tive
offe
nses
suc
h as
con
spira
cy, s
olic
itatio
n, fa
cilit
atio
n, a
idin
g, a
nd a
betti
ng, e
tc.
341
unpr
oces
sed
judg
men
t ord
ers
-- to
tal a
dmis
sion
s: 1
2,78
8.85
offe
nder
s w
ith li
fe s
ente
nces
are
incl
uded
in th
e TD
OC
cou
nts,
but
are
not
incl
uded
in th
e ca
lcul
atio
n of
ave
rage
sen
tenc
e le
ngth
s.
Aver
age
Sent
ence
Len
gth
by P
rimar
y O
ffens
e G
roup
: FY
2016
- 20
17Fe
lony
Adm
issi
ons
PRIM
ARY
OFF
ENSE
GR
OUP
TDO
C SE
NTEN
CED
LOCA
LLY
SENT
ENCE
DSY
STEM
WID
E
% O
f Sys
tem
To
tal
Aver
age
Sent
ence
(Y
ears
)
Num
ber o
f O
ffend
ers
% O
f TDO
C To
tal
Aver
age
Sent
ence
(Y
ears
)
Num
ber o
f O
ffend
ers
% O
f Loc
al
Tota
l
Aver
age
Sent
ence
(Y
ears
)
Syst
em-w
ide
Tota
l
PERSON PROPERTY SOCIETAL OTHER
24 2017 Statistical Abstract
Average Time Served by Primary Offense: Releases by Location FY 2016 - 2017
Hom
icid
eM
urde
r21
34.
31%
21.4
613
0.24
%14
.10
40.
15%
4.73
230
1.75
%20
.78
Negl
igen
t Man
slau
ghte
r7
0.14
%7.
307
0.13
%1.
405
0.18
%2.
0619
0.14
%3.
75Ki
dnap
ping
440.
89%
12.4
68
0.15
%3.
6111
0.40
%4.
1863
0.48
%9.
99Se
x Of
fens
esFo
rcib
le24
54.
96%
12.4
377
1.41
%7.
5148
1.76
%4.
5937
02.
82%
10.4
1No
n-Fo
rcib
le39
0.79
%4.
6674
1.36
%2.
1726
0.96
%1.
7513
91.
06%
2.81
Assa
ult
Agg
rava
ted
Assa
ult
538
10.9
0%7.
3342
67.
82%
3.46
386
14.1
8%2.
831,
350
10.3
0%4.
85Ot
her A
ssau
lt39
0.79
%3.
6778
1.43
%1.
9439
1.43
%1.
4715
61.
19%
2.28
Arso
n13
0.26
%5.
2216
0.29
%3.
249
0.33
%2.
1038
0.29
%3.
65Bu
rgla
ry66
813
.53%
5.52
798
14.6
4%3.
6051
819
.03%
2.69
1,98
415
.14%
4.03
Forg
ery/
Frau
d13
92.
82%
4.14
337
6.18
%2.
4112
34.
52%
2.73
599
4.57
%2.
89La
rcen
y/Th
eft
466
9.44
%4.
2581
614
.98%
2.83
384
14.1
1%2.
231,
666
12.7
1%3.
09Ro
bber
yAg
grav
ated
Rob
bery
433
8.77
%10
.58
831.
52%
8.51
401.
47%
3.41
556
4.24
%9.
77Al
l Oth
er R
obbe
ry21
54.
35%
5.74
100
1.84
%4.
1812
64.
63%
3.17
441
3.36
%4.
67Dr
ug O
ffens
esCo
cain
e Of
fens
es51
110
.35%
8.47
265
4.86
%6.
2217
76.
50%
3.81
953
7.27
%6.
99Ot
her D
rug
Offe
nses
759
15.3
7%5.
281,
362
25.0
0%3.
3043
115
.83%
2.77
2,55
219
.47%
3.81
Vehi
cula
rVe
hicu
lar H
omic
ide/
DUI
420.
85%
7.22
140.
26%
5.28
10.
04%
3.40
570.
43%
6.67
All O
ther
Veh
icul
ar37
0.75
%3.
3662
1.14
%2.
3315
0.55
%1.
4611
40.
87%
2.56
C/S/
F Pe
rson
561.
13%
9.26
120.
22%
4.40
90.
33%
1.91
770.
59%
7.72
C/S/
F Pr
oper
ty44
0.89
%4.
5947
0.86
%2.
5546
1.69
%3.
0113
71.
05%
3.37
C/S/
F So
ciet
al/D
rugs
450.
91%
5.40
811.
49%
2.85
421.
54%
2.61
168
1.28
%3.
50Es
cape
10.
02%
0.70
140.
26%
1.88
00.
00%
150.
11%
1.79
All O
ther
383
7.76
%3.
7975
913
.93%
2.12
282
10.3
6%1.
991,
424
10.8
6%2.
55
Unkn
own
00.
00%
00.
00%
00.
00%
00.
00%
TOTA
L4,
937
100.
0%7.
265,
449
100.
0%3.
342,
722
100.
0%2.
7013
,108
100.
0%4.
71
Aver
age
time
serv
ed d
oes
not in
clude
six
(7) m
odifie
d jud
geme
nt o
rder
s. T
otal
relea
ses
are
13,1
15.
Aver
age
Tim
e Se
rved
by
Loca
tion:
FY
2016
- 20
17Fe
lony
Rele
ases
Prim
ary
Offe
nse
Cate
gory
TDOC
TD
OC B
ACKU
PLO
CALL
Y SE
NTEN
CED
SYST
EMW
IDE
Num
ber o
f Of
fend
ers
%
Aver
age
Tim
e Se
rved
(Y
ears
)
Num
ber o
f Of
fend
ers
%
Aver
age
Tim
e Se
rved
(Y
ears
)
Num
ber o
f Of
fend
ers
%
Aver
age
Tim
e Se
rved
(Y
ears
)
OTHERNu
mbe
r of
Offe
nder
s%
Aver
age
Tim
e Se
rved
(Y
ears
)
PERSON PROPERTY SOCIETAL
Population, Capacity, & Trends 25
.
Average Time Served by Primary Offense: Releases by Type FY 2016 - 2017
Homicid
eMu
rder
903.0
5%24.
98114
2.29%
16.65
2310.
22%27.
403
0.08%
5.33
00.0
0%230
1.75%
20.78
Neglige
nt Mans
laught
er2
0.07%
8.25
110.2
2%4.5
00
0.00%
50.1
3%0.8
21
0.09%
1.10
190.1
4%3.7
5Kid
nappin
g18
0.61%
15.99
320.6
4%8.5
44
1.78%
7.95
90.2
3%3.3
10
0.00%
630.4
8%9.9
9Sex
Offen
sesFor
cible
1796.0
7%10.
9067
1.35%
11.68
3415.
11%12.
3689
2.32%
7.85
10.0
9%4.5
0370
2.82%
10.41
Non-Fo
rcible
40.1
4%6.8
566
1.33%
3.72
41.7
8%4.5
062
1.62%
1.63
30.2
7%0.7
3139
1.06%
2.81
Assau
lt Aggra
vated
Assau
lt248
8.41%
6.79
66713.
40%5.4
323
10.22%
5.08
3268.5
1%2.6
586
7.63%
2.56
1,350
10.30%
4.85
Other
Assau
lt13
0.44%
4.03
490.9
8%2.8
64
1.78%
1.53
822.1
4%1.6
18
0.71%
2.84
1561.1
9%2.2
8Ars
on11
0.37%
5.45
160.3
2%3.6
60
0.00%
80.2
1%1.5
53
0.27%
2.60
380.2
9%3.6
5Bur
glary
40913.
87%5.2
7819
16.45%
4.57
198.4
4%5.6
1556
14.52%
2.65
18116.
06%2.5
91,9
8415.
14%4.0
3For
gery/F
raud
812.7
5%4.6
5195
3.92%
3.24
62.6
7%1.9
4263
6.87%
2.25
544.7
9%2.0
8599
4.57%
2.89
Larcen
y/Thef
t269
9.12%
4.51
57811.
61%3.7
518
8.00%
1.64
65417.
08%2.0
8147
13.04%
2.43
1,666
12.71%
3.09
Robber
yAg
gravat
ed Rob
bery
1655.6
0%12.
84350
7.03%
8.63
94.0
0%11.
9124
0.63%
5.53
80.7
1%6.0
3556
4.24%
9.77
All Oth
er Rob
bery
1184.0
0%5.0
8198
3.98%
5.11
94.0
0%9.0
789
2.32%
3.07
272.4
0%3.2
5441
3.36%
4.67
Drug O
ffense
sCo
caine
Offens
es384
13.03%
7.76
2835.6
9%8.2
39
4.00%
6.83
1684.3
9%5.3
0109
9.67%
3.51
9537.2
7%6.9
9Oth
er Dru
g Offe
nses
66622.
59%4.7
6805
16.17%
4.55
3716.
44%3.5
6708
18.49%
2.51
33629.
81%2.7
92,5
5219.
47%3.8
1Ve
hicula
rVe
hicula
r Hom
icide/D
UI20
0.68%
6.75
290.5
8%7.0
42
0.89%
12.15
40.1
0%2.0
02
0.18%
2.00
570.4
3%6.6
7All
Other
Vehic
ular
70.2
4%3.6
741
0.82%
3.44
10.4
4%4.2
061
1.59%
1.69
40.3
5%5.1
3114
0.87%
2.56
C/S/F P
erson
290.9
8%9.0
831
0.62%
8.80
00.0
0%13
0.34%
3.41
40.3
5%2.4
077
0.59%
7.72
C/S/F P
ropert
y21
0.71%
4.80
521.0
4%4.3
44
1.78%
0.83
441.1
5%2.2
416
1.42%
2.04
1371.0
5%3.3
7C/S
/F Soci
etal/Dr
ugs39
1.32%
4.28
601.2
1%4.4
53
1.33%
0.93
431.1
2%2.3
923
2.04%
1.85
1681.2
8%3.5
0Esc
ape1
0.03%
5.30
50.1
0%1.5
50
0.00%
80.2
1%1.5
31
0.09%
1.10
150.1
1%1.7
9All
Other
1745.9
0%3.4
6510
10.25%
3.37
167.1
1%3.6
9611
15.95%
1.68
11310.
03%1.8
81,4
2410.
86%2.5
5Unk
nown
00.0
0%0
0.00%
00.0
0%0
0.00%
00.0
0%0
0.00%
TOTA
L2,9
48100
.00%
6.88
4,978
100.00
%5.3
3225
100.00
%8.3
6383
0100
.00%
2.55
1,127
100.00
%2.6
513,
108100
.00%
4.71
Avera
ge time
serve
d does
not in
clude
tsix (7)
modifi
ed jud
gement
orders
. Total
release
s are 1
3,115
Number
of Off
enders
Number
of Off
enders
Felony
Inmate
Relea
ses Av
erage
Time S
erved
by Rel
ease T
ype: FY
2016
- 2017
PRIMA
RY OFF
ENSE G
ROUP
PARO
LEEXP
IRATIO
NOT
HERPRO
BATIO
NCO
MMUNI
TY CO
RRECT
IONS
Averag
e Tim
e Serv
ed (Ye
ars)
SYSTEM
WIDE
Averag
e Tim
e Serv
ed (Ye
ars)
Number
of Off
enders
%Ave
rage
Time S
erved
(Years
)
Number
of Off
enders
%Ave
rage
Time S
erved
(Years
)
Number
of Off
enders
%%
%Ave
rage
Time S
erved
(Years
)
Number
of Off
enders
%Ave
rage
Time S
erved
(Years
)
SOCIETAL OTHERPERSON PROPERTY
26 2017 Statistical Abstract
INMATE ADMISSIONS AND RELEASES
In FY 2017, admissions decreased 46 (0.36%) and releases decreased 878 (6.27%) since last year.
Annual Admissions and Releases Fiscal Years 2007 – 2017
Felon Inmate Admissions by Type and Location: FY 2016 - 2017
Felon Inmate Releases by Type and Location: FY 2016 – 2017
TYPE TDOC % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %Parole Violators Return 1,449 13.5% 100 5.7% 24 7.0% 1,573 12.3%Probation Violator Return 2,022 18.9% 346 19.8% 104 30.5% 2,472 19.3%Community Corr. Return 865 8.1% 38 2.2% 30 8.8% 933 7.3%New Commit 6,279 58.7% 1,236 70.6% 180 52.8% 7,695 60.2%Escape Return & Other 82 0.8% 30 1.7% 3 0.9% 115 0.9%
TOTAL 10,697 1,750 341 12,788
TYPE TDOC % BACK-UP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %Parole 1,993 40.3% 671 12.3% 284 10.4% 0 - 2,948 22.5%Probation 710 14.4% 2,316 42.5% 804 29.5% 0 - 3,830 29.2%Community Corrections 32 0.6% 490 9.0% 605 22.2% 0 - 1,127 8.6%Sentence Expiration 2,100 42.5% 1,884 34.6% 995 36.6% 2 100.0% 4,981 38.0%Death 85 1.7% 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 - 86 0.7%Other 22 0.4% 88 1.6% 33 1.2% 0 - 143 1.1%
TOTAL 4,942 5,449 2,722 2 13,115
Population, Capacity, & Trends 27
.
Felon Inmate Admissions by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2016 – 2017
Felon Inmate Releases by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2016 – 2017
TDOC % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %65+ 72 0.7% 2 0.1% 1 0.3% 75 0.6%
60-64 133 1.2% 24 1.4% 6 1.8% 163 1.3%55-59 341 3.2% 58 3.3% 13 3.8% 412 3.2%50-54 584 5.5% 88 5.0% 21 6.2% 693 5.4%45-49 835 7.8% 118 6.7% 39 11.4% 992 7.8%40-44 1,189 11.1% 126 7.2% 45 13.2% 1,360 10.6%35-39 1,786 16.7% 255 14.6% 62 18.2% 2,103 16.4%30-34 2,130 19.9% 295 16.9% 64 18.8% 2,489 19.5%25-29 2,082 19.5% 381 21.8% 61 17.9% 2,524 19.7%20-24 1,387 13.0% 371 21.2% 29 8.5% 1,787 14.0%18-19 144 1.3% 32 1.8% 0 0.0% 176 1.4%<18 14 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 14 0.1%
Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%TOTAL 10,697 1,750 341 12,788
RACE TDOC % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %Black 2,836 26.5% 1,321 75.5% 120 35.2% 4,277 33.4%White 7,708 72.1% 389 22.2% 219 64.2% 8,316 65.0%Asian 23 0.2% 4 0.2% 0 0.0% 27 0.2%
Hispanic 118 1.1% 36 2.1% 2 0.6% 156 1.2%Native American 12 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12 0.1%
TOTAL 10,697 1,750 341 12,788
Sex TDOC % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %Male 8,750 81.8% 1,558 89.0% 270 79.2% 10,578 82.7%
Female 1,947 18.2% 192 11.0% 71 20.8% 2,210 17.3%TOTAL 10,697 1,750 341 12,788
Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System
TDOC % BACKUP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %65+ 125 2.5% 18 0.3% 8 0.3% 0 0.0% 151 1.2%
60-64 118 2.4% 50 0.9% 38 1.4% 0 0.0% 206 1.6%55-59 235 4.8% 147 2.7% 85 3.1% 0 0.0% 467 3.6%50-54 369 7.5% 264 4.8% 148 5.4% 0 0 781 6.0%45-49 486 9.8% 452 8.3% 192 7.1% 0 0.0% 1,130 8.6%40-44 630 12.7% 613 11.2% 257 9.4% 0 0.0% 1,500 11.4%35-39 822 16.6% 958 17.6% 402 14.8% 1 50.0% 2,183 16.6%30-34 934 18.9% 1100 20.2% 489 18.0% 0 0.0% 2,523 19.2%25-29 841 17.0% 1179 21.6% 577 21.2% 0 0.0% 2,597 19.8%20-24 369 7.5% 642 11.8% 502 18.4% 1 50.0% 1,514 11.5%18-19 13 0.3% 26 0.5% 24 0.9% 0 0.0% 63 0.5%<18 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%TOTAL 4,942 5,449 2,722 2 13,115
RACE TDOC % BACK-UP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %Black 1,917 38.8% 1,032 18.9% 1,771 65.1% 1 50.0% 4,721 36.0%White 2,941 59.5% 4,358 80.0% 899 33.0% 1 50.0% 8,199 62.5%Asian 5 0.1% 5 0.1% 3 0.1% 0 0.0% 13 0.1%
Hispanic 76 1.5% 48 0.9% 48 1.8% 0 0.0% 172 1.3%Native American 3 0.1% 6 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 0.1%
Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%TOTAL 4,942 5,449 2,722 2 13,115
Sex TDOC % BACK-UP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %Male 4,413 89.3% 4,169 76.5% 2,270 83.4% 1 50.0% 10,853 82.8%
Female 529 10.7% 1,280 23.5% 452 16.6% 1 50.0% 2,262 17.2%TOTAL 4,942 5,449 2,722 2 13,115
Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System
28 2017 Statistical Abstract
Inmate Admissions by Geographical Region: FY 2016 - 2017
Inm
ate
Adm
issi
ons
by G
eogr
aphi
cal R
egio
n: F
Y 20
16 -
2017
TDOC
LOCA
LSY
STEM
WID
EW
est
1,716
1,217
2,933
Midd
le4,3
3551
44,8
49Ea
st4,6
4619
4,665
The s
ystem
wide
total
s in t
he ab
ove c
hart
do no
t inclu
de 34
1un
proc
esse
d jud
gmen
t ord
ers.
Tota
l adm
ission
s are
12,78
8.
Population, Capacity, & Trends 29
.
Inmate Admissions by County of Conviction: FY 2016 – 2017
COUNTY # % # % # % COUNTY # % # % # %
ANDERSON 156 1.5% 0 0.0% 156 1.2% LAUDERDALE 55 0.5% 1 0.1% 56 0.4%BEDFORD 161 1.5% 0 0.0% 161 1.3% LAWRENCE 82 0.8% 1 0.1% 83 0.6%BENTON 15 0.1% 0 0.0% 15 0.1% LEWIS 19 0.2% 1 0.1% 20 0.2%BLEDSOE 18 0.2% 0 0.0% 18 0.1% LINCOLN 56 0.5% 0 0.0% 56 0.4%BLOUNT 272 2.5% 1 0.1% 273 2.1% LOUDON 56 0.5% 1 0.1% 57 0.4%BRADLEY 248 2.3% 0 0.0% 248 1.9% McMINN 119 1.1% 0 0.0% 119 0.9%CAMPBELL 104 1.0% 0 0.0% 104 0.8% McNAIRY 33 0.3% 0 0.0% 33 0.3%CANNON 54 0.5% 0 0.0% 54 0.4% MACON 63 0.6% 0 0.0% 63 0.5%CARROLL 37 0.3% 0 0.0% 37 0.3% MADISON 257 2.4% 2 0.1% 259 2.0%CARTER 121 1.1% 1 0.1% 122 1.0% MARION 43 0.4% 0 0.0% 43 0.3%CHEATHAM 63 0.6% 2 0.1% 65 0.5% MARSHALL 84 0.8% 0 0.0% 84 0.7%CHESTER 18 0.2% 0 0.0% 18 0.1% MAURY 177 1.7% 2 0.1% 179 1.4%CLAIBORNE 58 0.5% 5 0.3% 63 0.5% MEIGS 27 0.3% 0 0.0% 27 0.2%CLAY 28 0.3% 0 0.0% 28 0.2% MONROE 146 1.4% 0 0.0% 146 1.1%COCKE 100 0.9% 0 0.0% 100 0.8% MONTGOMERY 115 1.1% 0 0.0% 115 0.9%COFFEE 129 1.2% 7 0.4% 136 1.1% MOORE 12 0.1% 0 0.0% 12 0.1%CROCKETT 19 0.2% 0 0.0% 19 0.1% MORGAN 21 0.2% 0 0.0% 21 0.2%CUMBERLAND 217 2.0% 1 0.1% 218 1.7% OBION 52 0.5% 0 0.0% 52 0.4%DAVIDSON 686 6.4% 488 27.9% 1174 9.2% OVERTON 37 0.3% 0 0.0% 37 0.3%DECATUR 16 0.1% 0 0.0% 16 0.1% PERRY 13 0.1% 0 0.0% 13 0.1%DEKALB 70 0.7% 1 0.1% 71 0.6% PICKETT 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0%DICKSON 86 0.8% 0 0.0% 86 0.7% POLK 41 0.4% 0 0.0% 41 0.3%DYER 141 1.3% 0 0.0% 141 1.1% PUTNAM 253 2.4% 0 0.0% 253 2.0%FAYETTE 52 0.5% 0 0.0% 52 0.4% RHEA 41 0.4% 0 0.0% 41 0.3%FENTRESS 58 0.5% 1 0.1% 59 0.5% ROANE 70 0.7% 0 0.0% 70 0.5%FRANKLIN 83 0.8% 0 0.0% 83 0.6% ROBERTSON 129 1.2% 0 0.0% 129 1.0%GIBSON 73 0.7% 0 0.0% 73 0.6% RUTHERFORD 468 4.4% 6 0.3% 474 3.7%GILES 42 0.4% 0 0.0% 42 0.3% SCOTT 60 0.6% 0 0.0% 60 0.5%GRAINGER 46 0.4% 0 0.0% 46 0.4% SEQUATCHIE 32 0.3% 1 0.1% 33 0.3%GREENE 144 1.3% 0 0.0% 144 1.1% SEVIER 182 1.7% 0 0.0% 182 1.4%GRUNDY 33 0.3% 1 0.1% 34 0.3% SHELBY 554 5.2% 1,214 69.4% 1768 13.8%HAMBLEN 175 1.6% 2 0.1% 177 1.4% SMITH 55 0.5% 0 0.0% 55 0.4%HAMILTON 523 4.9% 5 0.3% 528 4.1% STEWART 16 0.1% 0 0.0% 16 0.1%HANCOCK 31 0.3% 0 0.0% 31 0.2% SULLIVAN 398 3.7% 1 0.1% 399 3.1%HARDEMAN 45 0.4% 0 0.0% 45 0.4% SUMNER 387 3.6% 1 0.1% 388 3.0%HARDIN 58 0.5% 0 0.0% 58 0.5% TIPTON 91 0.9% 0 0.0% 91 0.7%HAWKINS 78 0.7% 0 0.0% 78 0.6% TROUSDALE 18 0.2% 1 0.1% 19 0.1%HAYWOOD 37 0.3% 0 0.0% 37 0.3% UNICOI 33 0.3% 0 0.0% 33 0.3%HENDERSON 75 0.7% 0 0.0% 75 0.6% UNION 54 0.5% 0 0.0% 54 0.4%HENRY 23 0.2% 0 0.0% 23 0.2% VAN BUREN 6 0.1% 0 0.0% 6 0.0%HICKMAN 55 0.5% 0 0.0% 55 0.4% WARREN 96 0.9% 1 0.1% 97 0.8%HOUSTON 11 0.1% 0 0.0% 11 0.1% WASHINGTON 191 1.8% 0 0.0% 191 1.5%HUMPHREYS 16 0.1% 0 0.0% 16 0.1% WAYNE 60 0.6% 0 0.0% 60 0.5%JACKSON 8 0.1% 0 0.0% 8 0.1% WEAKLEY 32 0.3% 0 0.0% 32 0.3%JEFFERSON 105 1.0% 0 0.0% 105 0.8% WHITE 83 0.8% 1 0.1% 84 0.7%JOHNSON 41 0.4% 0 0.0% 41 0.3% WILLIAMSON 145 1.4% 0 0.0% 145 1.1%KNOX 879 8.2% 1 0.1% 880 6.9% WILSON 193 1.8% 0 0.0% 193 1.5%LAKE 33 0.3% 0 0.0% 33 0.3% Unknown 341 3%
TOTAL 10,697 100% 1,750 100% 12,788 100%
TDOC LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE TDOC LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE
30 2017 Statistical Abstract
Felon Inmate Population by County of Conviction: June 30, 2017
COUNTY # % # % # % # % COUNTY # % # % # % # %
ANDERSON 163 0.7% 127 2.2% 3 0.1% 293 1.0% LAUDERDALE 105 0.5% 33 0.6% 8 0.3% 146 0.5%BEDFORD 373 1.7% 48 0.8% 6 0.2% 427 1.4% LAWRENCE 177 0.8% 79 1.4% 2 0.1% 258 0.8%BENTON 34 0.2% 13 0.2% 1 0.0% 48 0.2% LEWIS 40 0.2% 11 0.2% 1 0.0% 52 0.2%BLEDSOE 28 0.1% 12 0.2% 2 0.1% 42 0.1% LINCOLN 114 0.5% 66 1.2% 2 0.1% 182 0.6%BLOUNT 329 1.5% 104 1.8% 9 0.3% 442 1.4% LOUDON 91 0.4% 34 0.6% 9 0.3% 134 0.4%BRADLEY 286 1.3% 169 3.0% 7 0.2% 462 1.5% McMINN 128 0.6% 114 2.0% 3 0.1% 245 0.8%CAMPBELL 134 0.6% 104 1.8% 0 0.0% 238 0.8% McNAIRY 52 0.2% 16 0.3% 7 0.2% 75 0.2%CANNON 61 0.3% 19 0.3% 5 0.2% 85 0.3% MACON 61 0.3% 59 1.0% 1 0.0% 121 0.4%CARROLL 67 0.3% 35 0.6% 0 0.0% 102 0.3% MADISON 807 3.7% 41 0.7% 4 0.1% 852 2.8%CARTER 108 0.5% 67 1.2% 25 0.9% 200 0.7% MARION 99 0.4% 37 0.7% 3 0.1% 139 0.5%CHEATHAM 103 0.5% 47 0.8% 7 0.2% 157 0.5% MARSHALL 194 0.9% 54 0.9% 2 0.1% 250 0.8%CHESTER 40 0.2% 22 0.4% 1 0.0% 63 0.2% MAURY 336 1.5% 135 2.4% 1 0.0% 472 1.5%CLAIBORNE 109 0.5% 61 1.1% 4 0.1% 174 0.6% MEIGS 17 0.1% 20 0.4% 4 0.1% 41 0.1%CLAY 16 0.1% 22 0.4% 2 0.1% 40 0.1% MONROE 182 0.8% 60 1.1% 2 0.1% 244 0.8%COCKE 165 0.7% 43 0.8% 10 0.3% 218 0.7% MONTGOMERY 393 1.8% 72 1.3% 6 0.2% 471 1.5%COFFEE 271 1.2% 47 0.8% 9 0.3% 327 1.1% MOORE 34 0.2% 7 0.1% 1 0.0% 42 0.1%CROCKETT 44 0.2% 22 0.4% 0 0.0% 66 0.2% MORGAN 37 0.2% 10 0.2% 0 0.0% 47 0.2%CUMBERLAND 286 1.3% 64 1.1% 1 0.0% 351 1.1% OBION 85 0.4% 36 0.6% 2 0.1% 123 0.4%DAVIDSON 3094 14.0% 225 4.0% 583 20.3% 3902 12.7% OVERTON 44 0.2% 36 0.6% 0 0.0% 80 0.3%DECATUR 25 0.1% 13 0.2% 3 0.1% 41 0.1% PERRY 22 0.1% 16 0.3% 1 0.0% 39 0.1%DEKALB 71 0.3% 51 0.9% 2 0.1% 124 0.4% PICKETT 7 0.0% 4 0.1% 0 0.0% 11 0.0%DICKSON 127 0.6% 49 0.9% 8 0.3% 184 0.6% POLK 30 0.1% 33 0.6% 0 0.0% 63 0.2%DYER 172 0.8% 92 1.6% 1 0.0% 265 0.9% PUTNAM 229 1.0% 174 3.1% 1 0.0% 404 1.3%FAYETTE 49 0.2% 43 0.8% 10 0.3% 102 0.3% RHEA 79 0.4% 24 0.4% 2 0.1% 105 0.3%FENTRESS 75 0.3% 53 0.9% 2 0.1% 130 0.4% ROANE 97 0.4% 43 0.8% 11 0.4% 151 0.5%FRANKLIN 159 0.7% 28 0.5% 6 0.2% 193 0.6% ROBERTSON 122 0.6% 75 1.3% 10 0.3% 207 0.7%GIBSON 120 0.5% 67 1.2% 1 0.0% 188 0.6% RUTHERFORD 713 3.2% 192 3.4% 33 1.2% 938 3.1%GILES 113 0.5% 24 0.4% 0 0.0% 137 0.4% SCOTT 65 0.3% 71 1.2% 1 0.0% 137 0.4%GRAINGER 100 0.5% 36 0.6% 1 0.0% 137 0.4% SEQUATCHIE 69 0.3% 19 0.3% 1 0.0% 89 0.3%GREENE 135 0.6% 84 1.5% 6 0.2% 225 0.7% SEVIER 318 1.4% 179 3.1% 19 0.7% 516 1.7%GRUNDY 82 0.4% 13 0.2% 8 0.3% 103 0.3% SHELBY 3412 15.4% 249 4.4% 1,305 45.5% 4966 16.2%HAMBLEN 224 1.0% 64 1.1% 22 0.8% 310 1.0% SMITH 55 0.2% 39 0.7% 0 0.0% 94 0.3%HAMILTON 804 3.6% 98 1.7% 19 0.7% 921 3.0% STEWART 14 0.1% 18 0.3% 0 0.0% 32 0.1%HANCOCK 24 0.1% 23 0.4% 0 0.0% 47 0.2% SULLIVAN 744 3.4% 219 3.9% 34 1.2% 997 3.3%HARDEMAN 78 0.4% 39 0.7% 9 0.3% 126 0.4% SUMNER 508 2.3% 213 3.7% 35 1.2% 756 2.5%HARDIN 65 0.3% 38 0.7% 4 0.1% 107 0.3% TIPTON 200 0.9% 33 0.6% 12 0.4% 245 0.8%HAWKINS 112 0.5% 58 1.0% 4 0.1% 174 0.6% TROUSDALE 40 0.2% 16 0.3% 0 0.0% 56 0.2%HAYWOOD 43 0.2% 33 0.6% 1 0.0% 77 0.3% UNICOI 31 0.1% 25 0.4% 4 0.1% 60 0.2%HENDERSON 99 0.4% 68 1.2% 1 0.0% 168 0.5% UNION 90 0.4% 19 0.3% 0 0.0% 109 0.4%HENRY 45 0.2% 16 0.3% 3 0.1% 64 0.2% VAN BUREN 12 0.1% 4 0.1% 0 0.0% 16 0.1%HICKMAN 84 0.4% 20 0.4% 2 0.1% 106 0.3% WARREN 220 1.0% 36 0.6% 7 0.2% 263 0.9%HOUSTON 30 0.1% 8 0.1% 1 0.0% 39 0.1% WASHINGTON 181 0.8% 138 2.4% 30 1.0% 349 1.1%HUMPHREYS 34 0.2% 25 0.0% 1 0.0% 60 0.2% WAYNE 57 0.3% 43 0.8% 0 0.0% 100 0.3%JACKSON 20 0.1% 6 0.1% 0 0.0% 26 0.1% WEAKLEY 39 0.2% 30 0.5% 0 0.0% 69 0.2%JEFFERSON 220 1.0% 81 1.4% 3 0.1% 304 1.0% WHITE 80 0.4% 44 0.8% 1 0.0% 125 0.4%JOHNSON 66 0.3% 22 0.4% 6 0.2% 94 0.3% WILLIAMSON 258 1.2% 55 1.0% 0 0.0% 313 1.0%KNOX 2187 9.9% 194 3.4% 20 0.7% 2401 7.8% WILSON 276 1.2% 137 2.4% 2 0.1% 415 1.4%LAKE 44 0.2% 20 0.4% 2 0.1% 66 0.2% UNKNOWN 22 0% 0 0% 477 17% 499 1.6%
TOTAL 22,104 100% 5,685 100% 2865 100% 30,654 100%
TDOC BACKUP LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE TDOC BACKUP LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE
Population, Capacity, & Trends 31
.
Total Community Supervision Felon Population: June 30, 2017
Fiscal Year-End Community Supervision Felon Population: FY 2008 – FY 2017
Parole and Probation Population by District: June 30, 2017
Parole 11,778Community Corrections 7,908
Total 78,136
Probation 58,450
District Parole Probation Total
10 745 4,688 5,43320 1,107 5,455 6,56221 412 3,088 3,50030 987 6,021 7,00831 471 2,124 2,59540 147 1,936 2,08341 488 478 96642 1,517 4,106 5,62350 739 3,753 4,49251 493 2,652 3,14560 615 2,049 2,66461 734 2,433 3,16770 1,170 4,596 5,76671 527 2,685 3,21272 384 253 63780 389 2,270 2,65981 536 2,450 2,986
OIC 317 7,408 7,725Unassigned 0 5 5
TOTAL 11,778 58,450 70,228
32 2017 Statistical Abstract
COMMUNITY SUPERVISION DEMOGRAPHICS: AGE, SEX, AND RACE
Community Supervision Population by Age (Systemwide): June 30, 2017
Community Supervision Population by Age & Type of Supervision: June 30, 2017
65+ 1,098 1.9% 597 5.1% 68 0.9% 1,763 2.3%60-64 1,535 2.6% 602 5.1% 164 2.1% 2,301 2.9%55-59 2,895 5.0% 967 8.2% 354 4.5% 4,216 5.4%50-54 4,304 7.4% 1,257 10.7% 535 6.8% 6,096 7.8%45-49 5,555 9.5% 1,483 12.6% 762 9.6% 7,800 10.0%40-44 6,726 11.5% 1,695 14.4% 1,042 13.2% 9,463 12.1%35-39 9,164 15.7% 2,014 17.1% 1,372 17.3% 12,550 16.1%30-34 9,742 16.7% 1,789 15.2% 1,550 19.6% 13,081 16.7%25-29 10,115 17.3% 1,142 9.7% 1,371 17.3% 12,628 16.2%20-24 6,833 11.7% 230 2.0% 656 8.3% 7,719 9.9%18-19 473 0.8% 2 0.0% 32 0.4% 507 0.6%<18 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.0% 12 0.0%Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%TOTAL 58,450 100% 11,778 100% 7,908 100% 78,136 100%
Probation % Parole % Community Corrections % SYSTEMWIDE %
Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System
Population, Capacity, & Trends 33
.
Community Supervision Population by Race & Sex (Systemwide): June 30, 2017
Community Supervision Population by Sex, Race, and Type of Supervision June 30, 2017
MaleBlack 15,642 36.4% 4,705 45.2% 1,844 32.4% 22,191White 25,647 59.6% 5,310 51.0% 3,692 64.9% 34,649Asian 238 0.6% 43 0.4% 19 0.3% 300Hispanic 1,426 3.3% 350 3.4% 133 2.3% 1,909Native American 54 0.1% 12 0.1% 4 0.1% 70Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 1Total Male 43,007 100.0% 10,420 100.0% 5,693 100.0% 59,120
FemaleBlack 3,839 24.9% 345 25.4% 324 14.6% 4,508 White 11,332 73.4% 984 72.5% 1,871 84.5% 14,187 Asian 53 0.3% 6 0.4% 2 0.1% 61 Hispanic 198 1.3% 17 1.3% 16 0.7% 231 Native American 21 0.1% 6 0.4% 2 0.1% 29 Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0
Total Female 15,443 100.0% 1,358 100.0% 2,215 100.0% 19,016
TOTAL 58,450 74.8% 11,778 15.1% 7,908 10.1% 78,136
Probation % Parole % Community Corrections % Systemwide
Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System
34 2017 Statistical Abstract
COMMUNITY SUPERVISION ADMISSIONS AND RELEASES
Community Supervision Admissions and Releases by Location: FY 2016 - 2017
Community Supervision Releases by Type and Location: FY 2016 - 2017
TYPE Probation % Parole % Community Corrections
% SYSTEMWIDE %
Death 508 2.9% 122 3.0% 62 2.7% 692 2.9%Discharges & Expirations 11,528 65.9% 2,496 60.7% 621 26.6% 14,645 61.2%Revocation, Positive Drug Test 353 2.0% 13 0.3% 260 11.1% 626 2.6%Revocation, New Charge 2,471 14.1% 740 18.0% 416 17.8% 3,627 15.1%Revocation, New Charge Pending 460 2.6% 336 8.2% 76 3.3% 872 3.6%Revocation, Technical 2,175 12.4% 407 9.9% 899 38.5% 3,481 14.5%
TOTAL 17,495 4,114 2,334 23,943
Population, Capacity, & Trends 35
.
Community Supervision Admissions by Age, Race and Sex: FY 2016-2017
Community Supervision Releases by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2016-2017
Probation % Parole % Community Corrections % SYSTEMWIDE %
65+ 235 1.3% 64 2.0% 17 0.6% 316 1.3%60-64 313 1.7% 86 2.6% 35 1.2% 434 1.8%55-59 640 3.5% 164 5.0% 83 2.8% 887 3.6%50-54 998 5.5% 265 8.1% 170 5.7% 1,433 5.9%45-49 1,351 7.5% 367 11.2% 228 7.7% 1,946 8.0%40-44 1,814 10.0% 461 14.1% 355 11.9% 2,630 10.8%35-39 2,623 14.5% 574 17.5% 482 16.2% 3,679 15.1%30-34 3,016 16.7% 619 18.9% 566 19.0% 4,201 17.3%25-29 3,532 19.6% 519 15.8% 611 20.5% 4,662 19.2%20-24 3,089 17.1% 158 4.8% 391 13.1% 3,638 15.0%18-19 443 2.5% 2 0.1% 34 1.1% 479 2.0%<18 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.1% 11 0.0%TOTAL 18,063 3,279 2,974 24,316
RACE Probation % Parole % Community Corrections % SYSTEMWIDE %
Black 5,873 32.5% 1,327 40.5% 705 23.7% 7,905 32.5%White 11,752 65.1% 1,902 58.0% 2,225 74.8% 15,879 65.3%Asian 87 0.5% 7 0.2% 11 0.4% 105 0.4%
Hispanic 327 1.8% 40 1.2% 32 1.1% 399 1.6%Native American 24 0.1% 3 0.1% 1 0.0% 28 0.1%
TOTAL 18,063 3,279 2,974 24,316
Sex Probation % Parole % Community Corrections % SYSTEMWIDE %
Male 13,152 72.8% 2,854 87.0% 2101 70.6% 18,107 74.5%Female 4,911 27.2% 425 13.0% 873 29.4% 6,209 25.5%TOTAL 18,063 3,279 2,974 24,316
Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System
Probation % Parole % Community Corrections % SYSTEMWIDE %
65+ 339 1.9% 82 2.0% 24 1.0% 445 1.9%60-64 439 2.5% 109 2.6% 25 1.1% 573 2.4%55-59 774 4.4% 244 5.9% 72 3.1% 1,090 4.6%50-54 1,177 6.7% 337 8.2% 133 5.7% 1,647 6.9%45-49 1,400 8.0% 423 10.3% 193 8.3% 2,016 8.4%40-44 1,905 10.9% 541 13.2% 271 11.6% 2,717 11.3%35-39 2,585 14.8% 766 18.6% 394 16.9% 3,745 15.6%30-34 3,066 17.5% 802 19.5% 469 20.1% 4,337 18.1%25-29 3,338 19.1% 637 15.5% 470 20.1% 4,445 18.6%20-24 2,372 13.6% 168 4.1% 273 11.7% 2,813 11.7%18-19 99 0.6% 4 0.1% 10 0.4% 113 0.5%<18 1 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.0%TOTAL 17,495 4,114 2,334 23,943
RACE Probation % Parole % Community Corrections % SYSTEMWIDE %
Black 5,623 32.1% 1,585 38.5% 526 240.9% 7,734 32.3%White 11,506 65.8% 2,437 59.2% 1,792 493.0% 15,735 65.7%Asian 77 0.4% 9 0.2% 3 0.1% 89 0.4%
Hispanic 262 1.5% 79 1.9% 12 11.2% 353 1.5%Native American 27 0.2% 4 0.1% 1 1.2% 32 0.1%
TOTAL 17,495 4,114 2,334 23,943
Sex Probation % Parole % Community Corrections % SYSTEMWIDE %
Male 12,710 72.6% 3,443 83.7% 1,673 71.7% 17,826 74.5%Female 4,785 27.4% 671 16.3% 661 28.3% 6,117 25.5%TOTAL 17,495 4,114 2,334 23,943
Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System
Population, Capacity, & Trends 37
.
Offender Accountability, Programs & Services
Offender Accountability, Programs & Services 39
.
COMMUNITY SERVICE
Total Hours and Estimated Value of Community Service Work - Inmate FY 2016 – 2017
Total Hours and Estimated Value of Community Service Work – Community Supervision
FY 2016 - 2017
1st. 2nd 3rd 4th. FACILITYQuarter Quarter Quarter Quarter TOTAL
BCCX 8,200 8,417 7,981 8,493 33,091HCCF 1,952 2,120 3,072 1,682 8,826MCCX 17,006 11,306 18,760 23,752 70,824MLTC 1,795 1,134 4,584 10,170 17,683NECX 19,863 17,164 22,213 22,689 81,929NWCX 4,722 4,452 5,676 6,934 21,784RMSI 33,658 29,998 28,223 29,112 120,991DSNF 0 0 0 0 0SCCF 992 0 0 0 992TPFW 9,480 6,034 6,174 6,962 28,650TTCC 0 0 0 0 0TCIX 63,632 58,387 59,934 56,025 237,978WTSP 652 304 176 353 1,485WCFA 0 0 0 0 0SYSTEM 161,952 139,316 156,793 166,172 624,233TOTAL SAVINGS: Dollar Value @ Minimum Wage $4,525,689Note: Mimimum wage = $7.25/hr.
1st. 2nd 3rd 4th. DISTRICTQuarter Quarter Quarter Quarter TOTAL
District 10 5,785 4,236 3,262 4,390 17,672District 20 2,044 1,789 1,725 1,851 7,409District 21 1,629 817 666 104 3,216District 30 847 456 815 529 2,647District 31 713 683 815 249 2,460District 40, 41, 42 1,867 1,333 1,412 908 5,520District 50 1,810 1,210 1,477 1,398 5,895District 51 2,387 930 582 800 4,699District 60 2,626 2,809 2,487 2,159 10,081District 61 425 300 384 408 1,517District 70, 71, 72 4,100 4,065 4,232 4,164 16,561District 80 136 942 470 1,720 3,268District 81 439 708 538 738 2,423SYSTEM 24,808 20,277 18,865 19,417 83,367TOTAL SAVINGS: Dollar Value @ Minimum Wage $604,408Note: Mimimum wage = $7.25/hr.
40 2017 Statistical Abstract
EDUCATIONAL, REHABILITATIVE, AND JOB PROGRAMS
Inmate Program Assignments: June 30, 2017
Percentage of
Assignment Inmates PopulationAcademic Education 2,002 9.06%Vocational Programs 1,640 7.42%Support 6,871 31.08%Program Services 1,150 5.20%Recycling 121 0.55%TRICOR 1,080 4.89%Work Lines 234 1.06%Other Agencies 92 0.42%Community Service 427 1.93%Work Release 49 0.22%Cognitive Behavioral 1,309 5.92%Behavioral Programming 1,121 5.07%Mental Health Programs 431 1.95%Tech. Violators Diversion Program 40 0.18%Release Center 193 0.87%Boot Camp/SAIU 27 0.12%Other 743 3.36%Total Assigned 17,530 79.31%Unassignable Status* 2,820 12.76%Job Waiting List 1,754 7.94%TOTAL INMATES 22,104 100.00%% of Eligible Inmates Assigned 87.2%
in segregation or initial classification, etc.*Inmates who can not be assigned due to their status, which may include those
Offender Accountability, Programs & Services 41
.
Inmate Educational Enrollment: FY 2016 – 2017
Test Results: FY 2016 – 2017
High School Equivalency & Vocational Certificates: FY 2008-2017
Full-Time Part-Time Full-time Part-TimeBCCX 386 0 83 0 554 0 1,023DSNF 19 0 0 0 75 0 94HCCF 954 7 0 0 521 0 1,482MCCX 1,104 0 59 42 682 0 1,887MLTC 0 0 0 2 12 0 14NECX 386 0 11 4 680 0 1,081NWCX 1,267 0 0 29 1,172 0 2,468RMSI 130 3 24 19 175 0 351SCCF 624 0 0 1 412 0 1,037TCIX 429 0 0 116 161 0 706
TPFW 269 0 0 0 158 0 427TTCC 1,443 0 0 0 512 0 1,955WCFA 913 0 0 0 568 0 1,481WTSP 143 0 149 63 439 0 794
TOTALS 8,067 10 326 276 6,121 0 14,800
INSTITUTION
ABE/HiSETVOLUNTEER
LITERACY COLLEGE
VOCATIONAL
TOTAL
VOCATIONALINSTITUTION NUMBER NUMBER PERCENTAGE NUMBER
TESTED PASSED PASSED COMPLETIONSBCCX 62 41 66% 237DSNF 8 1 13% 40HCCF 54 36 67% 237MCCX 169 80 47% 327MLCC 0 0 0% 0NECX 65 28 43% 312NWCX 177 60 34% 369RMSI 32 19 59% 112SCCF 60 25 42% 159TCIX 48 32 67% 65TPFW 11 8 73% 19TTCC 21 11 89% 23WCFA 105 52 50% 158WTSP 23 13 57% 291TOTALS 835 406 49% 2,349
TEST RESULTS 2016 - 2017HiSET COMPLETIONS
FY 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017GED / HiSET 786 737 710 700 640 618 460* 290* 499 406Vocational 1,342 1,468 1,585 2,282 3,676 3,672 2,927 2,938 2,611 2,349
*G.E.D. HiSET
*Due to the transition from GED to HiSET, there were fewer exams administered in the last of FY14 & first of FY15.
42 2017 Statistical Abstract
DRUG SCREENS
Random drug screens are conducted monthly on 2.5% of the inmate population. These screens are necessary to identify the use of substances frequently used in prison. Substance abuse program participants are given an initial urine screen at the beginning of the program and are subject to facility random and reasonable suspicion testing throughout the program. All positive screens are confirmed through additional testing and graduated sanctions are used for any positive drug screen.
Inmate Drug Screens: FY 2016 – 2017
The number of drug screenings administered increased from 3,188 in FY 2016 to 3,770 in FY 2017 (18%), and the percentage of positive drug screens increased from 226 to 296 respectively (31%).
Positive Drug Test Averages by Quarter: FY 2015 – FY 2017
1st 754 77 10.21% 5.13% 3.01%2nd 868 71 8.18% 6.34% 5.08%3rd 1,049 80 7.63% 7.32% 4.74%4th 1,099 68 6.19% 10.49% 5.86%Annual 3,770 296 7.85% 7.09% 4.86%Source: Corizon
7.85%
FY 2017 FY 2016 %
Positive
FY 2015 %
Positive
SA Program Average FY 2017
Quarter Number Tested
# Positive/ Refused
% Positive/ Refused
Offender Accountability, Programs & Services 43
.
INMATE HEALTH AND BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES
Number of Inmate Patients in Individual Chronic Care Clinics
June 30, 2017
Inmate Hospital Admissions: Fiscal Year 2013 – 2017
Site Hep C Seizure Diabetes HTN Asthma COPD HIV Cancer TB CardiacBCCX 638 88 195 513 115 65 16 8 36 80DSNF 92 25 96 248 26 34 10 35 2 59HCCF 274 46 99 392 102 30 0 9 14 29MCCX 468 54 125 478 111 47 37 7 26 57MLTC 40 0 8 45 13 1 4 1 1 3NECX 149 26 113 413 58 46 26 2 1 56NWCX 487 75 155 555 105 43 52 4 22 43RMSI 120 10 44 193 35 14 12 6 5 21SCCF 279 32 89 353 49 30 1 1 4 41TCIX-A 80 4 17 78 10 4 2 1 4 8TCIX-M 165 1 58 215 59 6 17 4 7 10TPFW 216 68 63 206 126 42 13 7 6 16TTCC 399 61 100 403 98 39 4 1 17 24WCFA 186 27 63 265 69 13 0 2 9 5WTRC 167 31 34 143 61 28 6 1 8 7WTSP 163 13 42 224 48 15 9 2 5 20TOTAL 3,923 561 1,301 4,724 1,085 457 209 91 167 479
44 2017 Statistical Abstract
Telehealth Encounters Monthly Average: Fiscal Year 2013 - 2017
Inmate Mental Health Patients for Levels of Care II, III, and IV Fiscal Year 2017
Offender Accountability, Programs & Services 45
.
Demographics
Demographics 47
.
Tennessee Department of Correction Facilities and Offices
48 2017 Statistical Abstract
CORRECTIONAL FACILITY DEMOGRAPHICS
Prison Security Designations: June 30, 2017
Inmate Population Custody Levels: June 30, 2017
County Facility Security Designation
Johnson Northeast Correctional Complex Minimum - MaximumMorgan Morgan County Correctional Complex Minimum - MaximumBledsoe Bledsoe County Correctional Complex Minimum - CloseTrousdale Trousdale Turner Correctional Complex Minimum - MediumDavidson DeBerry Special Needs Facility Minimum - Maximum
Riverbend Maximum Security Institution Minimum - MaximumTennessee Prison for Women Minimum - Maximum
Hickman Turney Center Industrial Complex Minimum - CloseWayne South Central Correctional Facility Minimum - CloseHardeman Hardeman County Correctional Facility Minimum - Medium
Whiteville Correctional Facility Minimum - MediumShelby Mark Luttrell Transition Center Minimum - MediumLauderdale West Tennessee State Penitentiary Minimum - MaximumLake Northwest Correctional Complex Minimum - Close
Prison Custody Level
Number of Inmates
Percent of Total
Maximum 513 2.3%Close 775 3.5%Medium 17,211 77.9%Minimum 3,033 13.7%Unclassified 572 2.6%TOTAL 22,104 100.0%
Demographics 49
.
Average Daily Population by Facility: FY 2016 – 2017
Facility Inmate Populations by Age: June 30, 2017
Institution Average Daily Population
Bledsoe County Correctional Complex (BCCX) 2,433DeBerry Special Needs Facility (DSNF) 657Hardeman County Correctional Facility (HCCF) 1,991Mark Luttrell Transition Center* (MLTC) 192Morgan County Correctional Complex (MCCX) 2,169Northeast Correctional Complex (NECX) 1,739Northwest Correctional Complex (NWCX) 2,305Riverbend Maximum Security Institution (RMSI) 781South Central Correctional Facility (SCCF) 1,656Tennessee Prison for Women (TPFW) 759Trousdale Turner Correctional Complex (TTCC) 2,366Turney Center Industrial Complex (TCIX) 1,589Whiteville Correctional Facility (WCFA) 1,514West Tennessee State Penitentiary (WTSP) 1,585System Total 21,677*Mark Luttrell transitioned from female to male release center in FY 2017.Source: TDOC Bed Space and Operating Capacities Report
65+ 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 18-19 <18 Avg Age
BCCX 62 82 109 216 288 344 394 414 344 178 23 1 39.2DSNF 57 51 66 62 82 75 98 57 57 13 1 0 46.1HCCF 41 44 99 126 214 239 326 343 365 191 5 0 37.6MCCX 39 52 95 146 206 252 349 339 403 257 9 0 37.1MLTC 0 3 15 18 30 33 44 37 32 24 0 0 38.1NECX 72 73 144 164 210 244 274 242 199 110 1 0 41.6NWCX 73 78 145 163 249 296 379 365 397 184 14 10 39.0RMSI 21 26 44 82 77 100 128 136 107 44 2 0 40.0SCCF 33 59 100 154 200 225 273 263 229 125 1 0 39.7TCIX 32 31 80 132 163 207 259 251 244 178 2 1 38.0TPFW 8 16 33 49 86 90 138 174 144 33 2 0 37.7TTCC 44 61 120 183 249 317 409 477 444 244 7 0 37.6WCFA 44 28 75 101 132 177 259 277 289 142 5 0 37.5WTSP 23 44 72 111 171 226 294 305 302 151 3 0 37.5
SYSTEM 549 648 1,197 1,707 2,357 2,825 3,624 3,680 3,556 1,874 75 12 38.7
50 2017 Statistical Abstract
Facility Inmate Populations by Race and Sex: June 30, 2017
Facility Inmate Populations by Primary Offense: June 30, 2017
Asian Black Hispanic Native American White Male Female
BCCX 13 661 36 6 1,739 2,155 300DSNF 3 254 8 2 352 619 0HCCF 4 914 46 0 1,029 1,993 0MCCX 5 987 39 3 1,113 2,147 0MLTC 0 131 7 0 98 236 0NECX 1 768 46 2 916 1,733 0NWCX 7 1,099 50 5 1,192 2,353 0RMSI 4 396 12 0 355 767 0SCCF 7 744 49 2 860 1,662 0TCIX 8 753 41 5 773 1,580 0TPFW 2 196 9 3 563 0 773TTCC 10 1,111 71 3 1,360 2,555 0WCFA 2 755 36 1 735 1,529 0WTSP 5 722 26 4 945 915 787SYSTEM 71 9,491 476 36 12,030 20,244 1,860
RACE SEX
BCCX DSNF HCCF MCCX MLTC NECX NWCX RMSI SCCF TCIX TPFW TTCC WCFA WTSPFacility Population 2,455 619 1,993 2,147 236 1,733 2,353 767 1,662 1,580 773 2,555 1,529 1,702
OFFENSEPERSON OFFENSES 35% 59% 43% 43% 25% 62% 45% 54% 56% 51% 32% 40% 47% 43% Homicide 11% 27% 13% 19% 6% 33% 15% 34% 23% 24% 17% 10% 13% 21% Kidnapping 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% Sex Offenses 11% 19% 16% 10% 0% 14% 15% 6% 20% 14% 2% 14% 18% 6% Assault 12% 11% 13% 13% 17% 13% 13% 12% 12% 12% 13% 15% 15% 15%PROPERTY OFFENSES 30% 21% 32% 31% 44% 19% 28% 25% 22% 25% 29% 32% 29% 27% Arson 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% Burglary 11% 6% 10% 9% 10% 4% 9% 6% 7% 8% 6% 11% 7% 6% Forgery/Fraud 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 5% 1% 1% 2% Larceny/Theft 8% 4% 4% 5% 7% 2% 5% 3% 3% 3% 8% 4% 3% 5% Robbery 9% 10% 16% 16% 26% 12% 13% 15% 11% 13% 9% 15% 17% 14%SOCIETAL OFFENSES 25% 17% 18% 20% 27% 15% 19% 17% 16% 18% 27% 21% 17% 21% Drugs/Narcotics 23% 15% 17% 19% 26% 14% 18% 16% 15% 18% 25% 20% 16% 20% Vehicular Homicide/DUI 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 2% 1% 1% 1%ALL OTHER OFFENSES 10% 5% 7% 5% 4% 5% 7% 3% 5% 5% 11% 7% 7% 7% C/S/F Person* 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 2% C/S/F Property* 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 1% C/S/F Societal* 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Escape 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% All Other** 7% 3% 5% 4% 3% 3% 5% 2% 3% 3% 5% 5% 5% 3%TOTAL 100% 102% 100% 99% 100% 101% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 100% 100% 98%
**Includes twenty-two (22) unprocessed judgment orders.*C/S/F = Refers to non-substantive offenses such as conspiracy, solicitation, facilitation, aiding and abetting, etc.
Demographics 51
.
CORRECTIONAL FACILITY INCIDENTS
Incidents by Type and Quarter: FY 2016 – 2017
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Total
Rape 0 0 0 0 0Weapon Offenses 405 404 577 439 1,825Drug Offenses 499 493 513 494 1,999STG Offenses 168 173 180 190 711Riot 0 0 0 1 1Sexual Misconduct 378 304 336 332 1,350AssaultAssault on Offender 73 101 104 98 376Assault on Staff 171 145 105 129 550DeathHomicide 1 0 0 0 1Suicide 0 1 0 1 2Accidental Death 0 0 0 0 0Natural Death 17 29 25 21 92Lethal Injection 0 0 0 0 0EscapeSecure Supervision 0 0 0 0 0Minimum Security 0 0 0 0 0Abscond Custody - Minimum Security 1 0 0 0 1Furlough/Pass 0 0 0 0 0
Total Incident Rate (per 100 inmates) 17.31 15.70 17.54 15.04 65.54Data source: Incident Report June 2017
52 2017 Statistical Abstract
TDOC Incident Summary by Incident Type and Facility: FY 2016 – 2017
TDO
C In
cide
nt S
umm
ary
by In
cide
nt T
ype
and
Faci
lity:
FY
2016
– 2
017
Plea
se n
ote
that
inci
dent
s rep
orte
d m
ay in
clud
e m
ore
than
one
par
ticip
ant w
hile
oth
er in
cide
nts a
re b
y de
finiti
on a
bout
a si
ngle
par
ticip
ant (
ex: d
eath
or s
uici
de).
SO
UR
CE:
Thi
s rep
ort s
umm
ariz
es d
ata
ente
red
by F
acili
ty O
pera
tions
’ per
sonn
el in
acc
orda
nce
with
TD
OC
pol
icy
103.
02.
July
Aug
ust
Sept
embe
rO
ctob
erN
ovem
ber
Dec
embe
rJa
nuar
yFe
brua
ryM
arch
Apr
ilM
ayJu
neTo
tal
Ave
rage
Pop
ulat
ion
2072
221
049
2141
121
549
2148
121
472
2143
421
564
2169
721
750
2188
322
018
2150
3In
c Ty
peIn
ciden
t Des
cript
ionA
rrest
AFO
FELO
NY
-OFN
00
00
00
00
00
00
0A
rrest
AFS
FELO
NY
-STA
FF2
32
03
25
25
13
230
Arre
stA
FVFE
LON
Y-V
ISIT
OR
13
24
162
42
165
1314
82A
rson
ARI
SER-
INJ-
PRO
P D
MG>
$500
-OPE
R D
ISRU
P0
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ars
onA
RDIN
JURY
-PRO
P D
MG
>$50
0-O
PR D
ISRU
P0
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ars
onA
RPPR
OP
DM
G >$
500
OPE
R D
ISRU
P1
10
11
00
00
00
04
Ass
ault
AO
OO
FN-W
ITH
OU
T W
EAPO
N14
1219
2026
2724
3128
2117
3327
2A
ssau
ltA
OW
OFN
-WEA
PON
910
97
129
69
66
1011
104
Ass
ault
ASO
STA
FF-W
ITH
OU
T W
EAPO
N37
3643
2426
2721
1924
2625
1932
7A
ssau
ltA
SWST
AFF
-WEA
PON
1919
1717
3120
1810
1320
2415
223
Ass
ault
AV
OV
ISIT
OR/
GUES
T-W
ITH
OU
T W
EAPO
N0
00
00
00
01
00
01
Ass
ault
AV
WV
ISIT
OR/
GUES
T - W
EAPO
N0
00
00
00
00
00
00
Dea
thD
EAO
FN-N
ATU
RAL
93
56
1112
129
410
47
92D
eath
DEC
DEA
TH-O
FN-E
XEC-
ELEC
CH
R0
00
00
00
00
00
00
Dea
thD
EHO
FN-H
OM
ICID
E0
10
00
00
00
00
01
Dea
thD
EIO
FN-E
XEC-
LETH
INJ
00
00
00
00
00
00
0D
eath
DES
OFN
-SU
ICID
E0
00
01
00
00
10
02
Dea
thD
OA
OFN
-ACC
IDEN
T0
00
00
00
00
00
00
Dea
thD
EGST
AFF
-HO
MIC
IDE
(ON
DU
TY)
00
00
00
00
00
00
0D
eath
DEF
STA
FF-S
UIC
IDE
(ON
DU
TY)
00
00
00
00
00
00
0D
eath
DED
STA
FF-A
CCID
ENT
(ON
DU
TY)
00
00
00
00
00
00
0D
eath
DET
STA
FF (O
N D
UTY
)-NA
TURA
L0
00
00
00
00
00
00
Dea
thD
EVV
ISIT
OR
00
00
00
00
00
00
0D
eath
DV
HV
ISIT
OR-
HO
MIC
IDE
00
00
00
00
00
00
0D
eath
DV
SV
ISIT
OR-
SUIC
IDE
00
00
00
00
00
00
0D
eath
DV
AV
ISIT
OR-
ACC
IDEN
T0
00
00
00
00
00
00
Dea
thD
VN
VIS
ITO
R-N
ATU
RAL
00
00
00
00
00
00
0D
istu
rban
ceD
ILTE
MP.
CO
NTR
OL
LOSS
00
00
00
00
00
00
0D
istu
rban
ceD
IRTH
REA
T CO
NTR
OL
LOSS
00
00
00
00
00
00
0D
istu
rban
ceD
ISM
INO
R9
118
49
38
22
22
464
Dru
gsD
FIIN
SID
E SE
CURE
PER
IMET
ER-N
O P
OSS
13
06
13
83
125
71
50D
rugs
DFO
OU
TSID
E SE
CURE
PER
IMET
ER0
00
00
00
11
31
06
Dru
gsD
RKCO
NFI
S-SI
GNIF
AM
T-ST
AFF
10
00
00
00
00
00
1D
rugs
DRL
CON
FIS-
SIGN
IF A
MT-
VIS
ITO
R0
01
00
00
01
00
02
Dru
gsD
RNCO
NFI
SCA
TIO
N-S
TAFF
00
00
00
00
00
00
0D
rugs
DRO
CON
FISC
ATI
ON
-VIS
ITO
R0
02
00
00
00
00
02
Dru
gsD
RPPA
RAPH
ERN
ALI
A31
4426
3548
3535
3624
2429
2339
0D
rugs
DRS
POSS
ESSI
ON
/ SE
LLIN
G / U
SE14
312
712
013
010
612
812
213
713
212
114
713
215
45D
rugs
IOP
INTO
XICA
NTS
FO
UN
D O
N P
ROPE
RTY
00
00
10
10
00
01
3Eq
uip
Prob
EPA
MA
JOR
DIS
RUPT
ION
20
00
01
00
00
20
5
Demographics 53
.
TDOC Incident Summary by Incident Type and Facility: FY 2016 – 2017 (cont.)
TDO
C In
cide
nt S
umm
ary
by In
cide
nt T
ype
and
Faci
lity:
FY
2016
– 2
017
(con
t.)
Plea
se n
ote
that
inci
dent
s rep
orte
d m
ay in
clud
e m
ore
than
one
par
ticip
ant w
hile
oth
er in
cide
nts a
re b
y de
finiti
on a
bout
a si
ngle
par
ticip
ant (
ex: d
eath
or
suic
ide)
. SO
UR
CE:
Thi
s rep
ort s
umm
ariz
es d
ata
ente
red
by F
acili
ty O
pera
tions
’ per
sonn
el in
acc
orda
nce
with
TD
OC
pol
icy
103.
02.
July
Aug
ust
Sept
embe
rO
ctob
erN
ovem
ber
Dec
embe
rJa
nuar
yFe
brua
ryM
arch
Apr
ilM
ayJu
neTo
tal
Ave
rage
Pop
ulat
ion
2072
221
049
2141
121
549
2148
121
472
2143
421
564
2169
721
750
2188
322
018
2150
3In
c Ty
peIn
ciden
t Des
cript
ionEs
cape
ACA
ABS
CON
D C
UST
OD
Y-A
TTEM
PT0
00
00
00
00
00
00
Esca
peA
CMA
BSCO
ND
CU
STO
DY
-MIN
SEC
URI
TY0
10
00
00
00
00
01
Esca
peES
ASE
CURE
SU
PERV
ISIO
N0
00
00
00
00
00
00
Esca
peES
BM
IN S
ECU
RITY
-VIO
LEN
CE0
00
00
00
00
00
00
Esca
peES
CM
IN S
ECU
RITY
UN
IT0
00
00
00
00
00
00
Esca
peES
FA
TT. S
ECU
RE S
UPV
10
01
01
00
00
00
3Es
cape
ESH
ATT
.MIN
SEC
URI
TY-V
IOLE
NCE
00
00
00
00
00
00
0Es
cape
ESI
ATT
. MIN
SEC
URI
TY0
00
00
00
00
00
00
Esca
peES
RRE
TURN
FRO
M E
SCA
PE P
RIO
R TO
TO
MIS
00
00
00
00
00
00
0Fi
reFI
ISE
R-IN
J-PR
OP
DM
G>$5
00-O
PR D
ISRU
P0
00
00
00
00
00
00
Fire
FIP
INJ-
PRO
P D
MG>
$500
-OPR
DIS
RUP
00
00
00
00
00
00
0Fi
reFI
SPR
OP
DM
G>$5
00-O
PER
DIS
RUP
00
02
00
00
00
01
3In
jury
IHA
ACC
IDEN
T-O
FN-S
ERIO
US
00
00
00
00
00
00
0In
jury
IHC
ACC
IDEN
T-O
FN W
RK R
ELA
TED
1210
114
97
117
76
1113
108
Inju
ryIH
BA
CCID
ENT-
OFN
0
00
00
00
00
00
00
Inju
ryIJ
AA
CCID
ENT-
STA
FF-S
ERIO
US
00
00
00
00
00
00
0In
jury
IJB
ACC
IDEN
T-ST
AFF
1615
2214
1123
1715
1117
1513
189
Inju
ryIL
AA
CCID
ENT-
VIS
ITO
R-SE
RIO
US
00
00
00
00
00
00
0In
jury
ILB
ACC
IDEN
T-V
ISIT
OR
01
11
12
11
46
21
21In
jury
INB
SELF
INFL
ICTE
D-S
ERIO
US
00
00
00
00
00
00
0In
jury
INC
SELF
INFL
ICTE
D18
1615
1211
319
2518
1516
1117
9Ill
ness
IOT
OFN
-SER
IOU
S-H
OSP
1915
2332
2624
4229
2018
2722
297
Illne
ssIS
HST
AFF
-SER
IOU
S-H
OSP
(ON
DU
TY)
67
90
64
74
46
53
61Ill
ness
IVS
VIS
ITO
R-SE
RIO
US-
HO
SP0
00
01
00
02
10
04
Illne
ssIV
MV
ISIT
OR
00
00
00
00
00
00
0O
ther
CIP
CELL
INSI
DE
PERI
MET
ER-N
O P
OSS
512
65
28
95
86
33
72O
ther
BTH
BOM
B TH
REA
T0
00
00
00
00
00
00
Oth
erCO
NCO
NTR
ABA
ND
199
219
156
167
162
175
233
180
179
147
157
139
2113
Oth
erPC
TPO
SS/U
SE C
ELLU
LAR
TEL.
156
190
159
176
149
136
197
157
164
130
161
125
1900
Oth
erPT
OPO
SS/U
SE T
OBA
CCO
PRO
D.
105
107
7390
6474
102
7765
6172
5894
8O
ther
PDA
PRO
P D
MG>
$500
67
58
88
62
73
73
70O
ther
SXM
SEXU
AL
MIS
CON
DU
CT11
415
211
210
785
112
110
125
101
9012
711
513
50O
ther
RAP
RAPE
00
00
00
00
00
00
0O
ther
RIO
RIO
T0
00
00
00
00
10
01
Oth
erSB
TSA
BOTA
GE -
OPR
DIS
RUP
00
00
00
00
00
00
0O
ther
HO
SH
OST
AGE
SIT
UA
TIO
N0
00
00
00
00
10
01
Oth
erEH
TEP
IDEM
IC P
UBL
IC H
EALT
H T
HRE
AT
00
00
00
00
00
00
0O
ther
PGA
PART
IN S
TG A
CTIV
ITY
2013
2317
2929
2318
1615
3825
266
Oth
erPG
MPO
SSES
S ST
G M
ATE
RIA
L40
3537
3234
3257
2541
4731
3444
5O
ther
ILP
INST
LO
CKD
OW
N-P
ART
IAL
103
23
33
52
11
20
35O
ther
ILT
INST
LO
CKD
OW
N-T
OTA
L1
02
03
14
12
34
122
54 2017 Statistical Abstract
TDOC Incident Summary by Incident Type and Facility: FY 2016 – 2017 (cont.)
TDO
C In
cide
nt S
umm
ary
by In
cide
nt T
ype
and
Faci
lity:
FY
2016
– 2
017
(con
t.)
Ju
lyAu
gust
Sept
embe
rO
ctob
erNo
vem
ber
Dece
mbe
rJa
nuar
yFe
brua
ryM
arch
April
May
June
Tota
lAv
erag
e Po
pulat
ion
2072
221
049
2141
121
549
2148
121
472
2143
421
564
2169
721
750
2188
322
018
2150
3In
c Typ
eIn
ciden
t Des
cript
ionSt
rike
SKI
INM
ATE-
OPER
.DIS
RUP
00
00
00
00
00
00
0St
rike
SKS
STAF
F-OP
ER D
ISRU
P0
00
00
00
00
00
00
Suici
deSU
AAT
T-SE
RIOU
S IN
JURY
00
00
00
00
00
00
0Su
icide
SUC
ATTE
MPT
66
28
51
52
45
11
46Us
e of F
orce
UFC
CHEM
ICAL
AGE
NTS
4433
3845
4537
3841
2842
4129
461
Use o
f For
ceUF
DDE
ADLY
WEA
PON
00
00
00
00
00
00
0Us
e of F
orce
UFE
ELEC
RES
TRAI
NTS
42
35
24
26
83
68
53Us
e of F
orce
UFL
LESS
THA
N LE
THAL
00
00
00
00
00
00
0Us
e of F
orce
UFM
MED
ICAL
46
24
22
108
249
75
83Us
e of F
orce
UFP
PHYS
ICAL
2440
3131
2028
2918
2234
3022
329
Wea
pon
WAB
AMM
UNIT
ION
00
00
20
00
01
00
3W
eapo
nW
AMAM
MUN
ITIO
N-SI
GNIF
AM
T0
00
00
00
00
00
00
Wea
pon
WCF
COM
MER
CIAL
FIR
EARM
00
00
00
00
00
00
0W
eapo
nW
CKCO
MM
ERCI
AL K
NIFE
32
24
10
10
10
30
17W
eapo
nW
EBEX
PLOS
IVE
00
00
00
00
00
00
0W
eapo
nW
EXEX
PLOS
IVE-
SIGN
IF A
MT
00
00
00
00
00
00
0W
eapo
nW
HFNO
N CO
MM
ERCI
AL F
IREA
RM0
00
00
00
00
00
00
Wea
pon
WHK
NON
COM
MER
CIAL
KNI
FE87
126
119
133
119
101
186
142
143
9714
712
115
21W
eapo
nW
OTOT
HER
1110
47
43
126
48
66
81W
eapo
nW
PCCL
UB0
01
20
01
01
00
05
Wea
pon
WRM
RAW
MAT
ERIA
LS14
1115
78
1225
3220
615
2819
3W
eapo
nW
TACL
ASS
A TO
OL0
00
10
00
11
00
14
Wea
pon
WTB
CLAS
S B
TOOL
00
00
00
10
00
00
1
TOTA
L1,
204
1,31
21,
127
1,17
21,
104
1,09
91,
417
1,19
01,
175
1,02
41,
218
1,05
014
,092
Rate
per
100
- To
tal
5.81
6.23
5.26
5.44
5.14
5.12
6.61
5.52
5.42
4.71
5.57
4.77
65.5
4
Plea
se n
ote
that
incid
ents
repo
rted
may
inclu
de m
ore
than
one
par
ticipa
nt w
hile
othe
r inc
ident
s ar
e by
def
initio
n ab
out a
sing
le pa
rticip
ant (
ex: d
eath
or s
uicide
).Inc
ident
rate
s (p
er 1
00 in
mat
es) a
re c
alcula
ted
on th
e ba
sis o
f the
ave
rage
inm
ate
popu
lation
by f
acilit
y and
sys
tem
wide
.SO
URCE
: This
repo
rt su
mm
arize
s da
ta e
nter
ed b
y Fac
ility O
pera
tions
’ per
sonn
el in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith T
DOC
polic
y 103
.02.
Demographics 55
COMMUNITY SUPERVISION DEMOGRAPHICS
Parolee Populations by District and Age: June 30, 2017
Parolee Populations by District by Race and Sex: June 30, 2017
District 65+ 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 18-19 <18 Avg Age
10 41 43 67 100 93 112 112 107 64 6 0 0 44.420 57 57 106 116 135 134 181 182 119 20 0 0 43.221 24 20 30 47 42 59 82 63 42 3 0 0 43.230 78 67 105 112 120 152 155 118 65 15 0 0 45.731 24 12 29 59 71 61 80 68 53 14 0 0 42.340 1 4 5 10 17 19 38 28 24 1 0 0 38.741 42 37 50 76 80 53 79 54 16 1 0 0 47.542 66 91 139 145 179 212 270 237 149 28 1 0 43.050 29 33 50 72 80 127 132 126 72 18 0 0 42.151 31 27 48 45 59 69 88 73 49 4 0 0 43.960 23 32 45 66 66 95 105 86 76 21 0 0 42.161 36 24 51 76 104 105 148 118 64 8 0 0 42.770 57 66 88 107 137 181 212 171 114 37 0 0 42.671 12 20 39 42 74 78 78 87 69 28 0 0 40.672 12 20 27 52 70 61 56 53 28 5 0 0 43.880 23 15 27 44 42 54 67 71 40 5 1 0 42.781 26 22 36 50 63 70 87 94 75 13 0 0 41.7
OIC 15 12 25 38 51 53 44 53 23 3 0 0 43.9Unassigned 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SYSTEM 597 602 967 1,257 1,483 1,695 2,014 1,789 1,142 230 2 0 43.2
District Asian Black Hispanic Native American White Male Female
10 1 100 21 1 622 642 10320 4 272 19 4 808 957 15021 0 32 4 1 375 360 5230 3 252 6 2 724 864 12331 1 49 9 1 411 372 9940 0 33 80 0 34 143 441 5 209 38 1 235 466 2242 5 979 30 1 502 1,317 20050 9 236 29 2 463 635 10451 2 156 10 1 324 434 5960 2 372 4 0 237 562 5361 2 254 4 0 474 647 8770 4 977 43 1 145 1,067 10371 1 437 3 0 86 485 4272 0 303 29 0 52 382 280 2 119 9 2 257 350 3981 5 162 13 0 356 472 64
OIC 3 108 16 1 189 265 52Unassigned 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SYSTEM 49 5,050 367 18 6,294 10,420 1,358
RACE SEX
56 2017 Statistical Abstract
Probationer Populations by District and Age: June 30, 2017
Probationer Populations by District by Race and Sex: June 30, 2017
District 65+ 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 18-19 <18 Avg Age
10 103 114 231 370 474 677 729 821 757 394 17 1 38.420 104 133 256 388 533 644 871 1,003 923 560 40 0 37.521 65 71 128 223 314 338 529 561 526 305 28 0 37.530 97 147 291 426 529 738 975 982 1,109 677 47 3 37.231 61 62 109 168 199 242 319 349 351 252 11 1 38.040 31 45 74 123 169 184 296 321 382 290 21 0 35.941 23 22 48 58 61 60 64 70 53 19 0 0 43.042 43 100 178 256 349 438 660 729 775 531 47 0 36.250 64 61 154 228 324 392 567 626 705 573 57 2 35.851 68 86 138 181 260 291 398 402 457 347 24 0 37.660 39 47 90 128 184 231 345 340 369 257 19 0 36.761 41 53 109 182 214 278 402 409 385 333 27 0 36.970 50 96 155 236 333 449 654 778 987 815 43 0 34.771 34 45 61 118 194 228 371 420 610 564 38 2 33.672 9 8 23 23 33 21 36 41 47 10 2 0 40.480 27 37 92 160 168 253 357 418 423 316 19 0 35.981 36 62 123 159 223 224 366 439 467 321 29 1 36.4
OIC 203 346 634 876 993 1,036 1,225 1,033 789 269 4 0 42.3Unassigned 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 48.0
SYSTEM 1,098 1,535 2,895 4,304 5,555 6,726 9,164 9,742 10,115 6,833 473 10 37.4
District Asian Black Hispanic Native American White Male Female
10 12 400 67 6 4,203 3,152 1,53620 19 888 80 15 4,453 3,907 1,54821 2 207 29 3 2,847 2,210 87830 8 1,305 72 3 4,633 4,304 1,71731 0 96 43 4 1,981 1,437 68740 19 1,168 106 2 641 1,493 44341 4 192 19 1 262 388 9042 34 2,394 121 2 1,555 3,132 97450 68 894 155 3 2,633 2,765 98851 13 505 54 3 2,077 1,876 77660 4 1,059 28 4 954 1,614 43561 1 690 26 3 1,713 1,719 71470 22 3,844 74 0 656 3,475 1,12171 17 2,098 41 2 527 2,035 65072 1 185 13 0 54 238 1580 16 613 46 3 1,592 1,707 56381 10 506 66 2 1,866 1,688 762
OIC 41 2,435 584 19 4,329 5,863 1,545Unassigned 0 2 0 0 3 4 1
SYSTEM 291 19,481 1,624 75 36,979 43,007 15,443
RACE SEX
Demographics 57
Probation/Parole Populations by Level of Supervision: June 30, 2017
Probation/Parole Supervision Standards
Parole ProbationSpecial Restricted 27 777
Restricted 930 4,337Elevated 716 2,654Standard 5,231 25,279
Administrative 3,150 23,716PSU 1,665 1,591
Unassigned 59 96Totals 11,778 58,450
58 2017 Statistical Abstract
Program Supervision Unit (PSU)
Each whole number is the required contact each month.
Each fraction is the number of contacts / number of months
EX: 1/3 is one contact every three months (quarterly contact).
Monthly Interactions
Face
-to-
face
(o
ffice
)
Face
-to-
face
(Fie
ld)
Colla
tera
l Con
tact
Sex
Offe
nder
Tr
eatm
ent
Hom
e Vi
sit
Empl
oym
ent
Fees
Spec
ial C
ondi
tions
Sex
Offe
nder
Re
gist
ry
Arre
st C
heck
Resid
ence
Sea
rch
Drug
Scr
een
Poly
grap
h
Risk
Ass
essm
ent
New
PSU
Sup
ervi
sion
Stan
dard
s
PSU Primary 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/3 1 1/3 1/3 1/6 1/6
PSU Secondary 2 1 1 1 1/2 1/3 1/3 1/3 1 1/6 1/6 1/6 1/6
PSU Intermediate 1 1/2 1 1/2 1/2 1/3 1/3 1/3 1 1/9 1/12 1/6 1/12
PSU Transitional 1/2 1 1/3 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/3 1/3 1 1/12 1/12 1/6 1/12
60 2017 Statistical Abstract
STATISTICAL ABSTRACT USER’S GUIDE
Population, Capacity, & Trends
TDOC Backup: Felons sentenced to TDOC custody and held in local jails while awaiting transfer to a TDOC institution. Local or Locally Sentenced: Convicted felons sentenced to serve their time in a local jail. As felony offenders, these persons are under TDOC jurisdiction. Other Convicted Felons: Convicted felons awaiting sentencing or not yet ready for transfer to TDOC because of other pending charges. Includes technical violators awaiting probable cause/revocation/rescission hearing or adjudication of pending charges. Convicted Misdemeanants: Inmates serving time because of a misdemeanor conviction. Pre-Trial Felony Detainees: Inmates charged with a felony but not yet convicted. Pre-Trial Misdemeanant Detainees: Inmates charged with a misdemeanor but not yet convicted. Others: Inmates held in local facilities for federal crimes, city ordinances, etc. Community Corrections: A grant program created in 1985 as an alternative to incarceration. Programs are developed based on the individual needs of the area served. Probation: Felons subject to conditions imposed by the court and subject to community supervision without incarceration. Parole: Felons originally sentenced to an incarceration period and released to serve the remainder of their sentence under community supervision.
Offender Accountability, Programs & Services
Level of Care: An inmate’s need for mental health services based on their ability to function in general population. Level I: No mental health services are indicated for the inmate. Adjustment and function in the general population is not impaired by mental illness.
User’s Guide 61
Level II: Mental health outpatient services are indicated when an inmate’s ability to function in general population is mildly impaired due to mental illness and/or mental retardation or is not currently impaired but he/she needs monitoring. Level III: Supported living unit services are indicated when an inmate’s ability to function in general population is moderately impaired due to a serious mental illness. This designation reflects a tenuous mental status that is easily overwhelmed by everyday pressures, demands, and frustrations. Level IV: Supported living unit services are indicated when an inmate’s ability to function in general population is severely impaired due to serious and persistent mental illness. This level reflects active symptoms of a major mental illness and impaired reality testing.
Demographics
Class A Incidents: Events which involve life threatening matters and breaches of security that are likely to cause serious operational problems, imminent threat to the control and order of a facility and/or to the community Selected other incidents: Less serious events where injury to staff, visitors and/or inmates may or may not have occurred that cause the disruption of the normal facility operation, or which pose a possible risk to the health or safety of the general public that did not require the involvement of outside agencies in institutional functions, as well as events that pose no threat to the local community, or to the safe and secure operation of the institution. Please note that most incidents reported in the monthly summary may include more than one participant or infraction while other incidents are by definition about a single participant (ex: death or suicide).
www.tn.gov/correction
RACHEL JACKSON BUILDING 320 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH
NASHVILLE, TN 37243 615-253-8187