statistical techniques mar 6648: marketing research february 1, 2011

67
Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Upload: michael-whitehead

Post on 28-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Statistical Techniques

MAR 6648: Marketing ResearchFebruary 1, 2011

Page 2: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Overview

• We’ll talk about basic statistical tools– T-tests, crosstabs, and regression are useful tools

• We’ll talk about what they can and can’t do

• More sophisticated tools can give a deeper view of your customers– Conjoint analysis, cluster analysis, and factor

analysis can help you understand who your customers are and what they like

Page 3: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

A Quick Note on Data Analysis

• Statistics are just one part of an argument• People are easily persuaded by numbers and statistics

– The more complicated the analysis, the less likely it is to be challenged

• The strongest challenge to many statistical arguments is not in how the data are analyzed, but in how the data are collected– Methodological expertise always trumps data analytic

experience– Data analytic knowledge allows for more careful

consideration of methodology

Page 4: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Really Basic: Comparing Groups

• In marketing we often have a need to understand differences between groups– Segmentation

• Are two or more segments really different along some dimension of behavior or attitude?

– Experiments• Did the treatment work?

• We need a systematic approach that allows us to say when two (or more) groups of customers, companies, markets, etc. really are different

Page 5: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Most Basic: t-tests

• Do web shoppers pay a different price for cars than dealership shoppers?

• Do a hypothesis test:

=Null Hypothesis:

≠Alternative:

Page 6: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

T-test Results

• “Customers who bought their new vehicles on the Auto Online website report having paid less for their vehicles than did customers who purchased their vehicles at the dealership (Monline = $11,582 vs. Mdealer = $13,594), t(1398) = -6.14, p < .001).”– If the p-value of the test is “small” we reject the null

hypothesis– Here “small” typically means less than 5% (p = .05)

• Now try answering a different question:– Are customers who purchase a car online more likely to

buy their next car online as well?

Page 7: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Understanding Associations

• One of the most common questions in Marketing Research:– Are two (or more) variables associated?

Customer type

Subsequent transaction

Page 8: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Tools for Analyzing Associations

• Cross tabulation– Only for two categorical

variables– Easy to understand

• Regression– Applies to any number

of variables– Not necessarily

categorical variables– Slightly harder to

understand

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

0.75 1.25 1.75 2.25 2.75 3.25

Price

Sal

es

Online 1st Dealer 1st

Online 2nd

Dealer 2nd

Page 9: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Χ2-test for Association

• We can do a statistical test here• The null hypothesis is that there is no

association between method of first purchase and method of subsequent purchase– This means that the percentage of people their

next car online is the same regardless of how they purchased their previous car

• Again, if the p-value of the test is less than .05, we reject the null hypothesis

Page 10: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Intuition for Χ2-test

• The Χ2-test is based on comparing the actual cell counts to what we would expect them to be if there was no association

1 2

= 154/500

= 333/500

3 4

= 0.692*0.666 = 0.231*500

We would expect the table to looklike this if there was no association

Page 11: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Intuition for Χ2-test

• The Χ2-test is based on comparing the actual cell counts to what we would expect them to be if there was no association

Actual Expected

Conclusion: Based on this data, it looks like customers who purchase a car online are no more likely to buy their next car online than customers who bought their initial car from a dealer.

Χ2 (1, N = 500) = 3.002, p = .08

Page 12: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Crosstabs

• Crosstabs is a quick and easy tool for analyzing the association between two categorical variables

• Caveats:– You find associations – not causations

• An observed association may be driven by a third variable not captured in the analysis

• In crosstabs we cannot control for other variables – we need regression for this

– Warning: Be careful when cell counts are low. The test does not work well in this case (stats programs should tell you)

Page 13: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Key Points• T-tests:

– Good for analyzing data with a continuous dependent variable and a 2-level categorical variable

– Does not allow for a more complex design– Does not allow the analysis to control for the

presence of another known variable• Crosstabs

– An easy method for describing categorical data– Easily analyzed using simple non-parametric tests

(e.g., chi-square)– Poorly suited for handling non-categorical data– But often unable to isolate causation in data

Page 14: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Regression

• Regression analysis is widely used in Marketing Research– It can detect associations between variables– It can help make forecasts– It can test Marketing Mix models: Impact of

marketing mix variables on sales– It can analyze results of experiments

Page 15: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Example: Minute Maid Sales

• Imagine that you’ve been hired as a consultant for the Minute Maid Company

• Before going for an important meeting with senior management, you have been asked to analyze the sales data for MM orange juice for the Southern California market

• To assist in your deliberations, some data have become available from one of your key accounts (the largest grocery chain in the market)

Page 16: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Example: Minute Maid Sales

• The database was collected from weekly store scanner data that captures information such as sales (# of cartons sold), price, and other promotion information for each product

• Management is particularly interested in understanding how different pricing strategies affect sales

Page 17: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

The data

week Total OJ Sales(00 cartons) Minute Maid-Sales (00 cartons) Price-MM

1 1029 66 2.99

2 350 89 2.99

3 802 565 2.59

4 701 50 2.99

5 484 186 2.99

6 763 334 2.39

7 848 57 2.99

8 957 732 1.99

. . . .

. . . .

115 1296 88 2.53

116 1472 760 2.19

Page 18: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Weekly Minute Maid Sales and Price

Page 19: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

A Linear Sales Model

• We wish to explain variation of sales as a function of price• Assume that sales and price are related as:

St =β0 + β1Pt + εt

• We have now assumed that sales in week t is a linear function of price plus a random component

• We need to find β0 and β1

Page 20: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

SPSS Regression output

Test of H0: β1=0Ha: β1 ≠0

p-valuet-statistic

b1

b0

Standard errors of b0 and b1 ≈ uncertainty associated withb0,b1

St =β0 + β1Pt + εt

Page 21: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

What does this mean?

Page 22: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Key Points

• Regression:– Generates a specific equation describing the

relationship between a specific predictor (e.g., prices) and a specific outcome variable (e.g., sales)

– The results can offer precise (if imperfect) prescriptions for managers

Page 23: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Example: Minute Maid Sales

• We previously identified a relationship between Minute Maid prices and Minute Maid sales– Essentially, Sales = 1093 + (-377 x price)

• This model seems a little simplistic– What about accounting for the behavior of

competitors?– Regression is good at that too

Page 24: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

• St =β0 + β1Pmm + β2Ptp + β3Ptr + β4Psb + ε

Sales = 289 + (-479 × MMprice) + (131 × TPprice) + (175 × TRprice) + (144 × SBprice)

Page 25: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011
Page 26: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

These are dummy coded variables representing the presence or absence of specific product

promotions in the OJ market. Question:

Did our Minute Maid promotions positively influence sales? (controlling for the presence of other known variables)?

Page 27: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Controlling for everything else, the advertisement was still effective.

An ad increased sales by 202 units. (Now, given the cost of advertising, you can make a recommendation about whether advertising

is a good idea.)

Multiple Regression

Page 28: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Multiple Regression

Tropicana Ads do not influence Minute Maid sales, but Store Brand ads do.

What else can we learn?

It looks like ads generally decrease price sensitivities. (We would need to

test interactions to learn more about it)

Page 29: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Multiple Regression

• Conceptually, the procedure allows you to track multiple variables at once– Track the influence of competition– Control for exogenous factors (e.g., weather,

seasonality, etc.)

• Every added variable improves the fit of the model to the given data

Page 30: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Multiple Regression

• Pitfalls:– That does not necessarily make it better at

predicting the future. You can “overfit” the data– Bad things happen when the predictors are

strongly related to each other– It intrinsically assumes that a linear model is a

pretty good approximation• It often is• But not always…

Page 31: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Key Points

• Regression not only helps make precise predictions, it can simultaneously account for multiple influences

• In so doing, it gets much closer to causal inferences (and good market researchers are after causal inferences)

• Nevertheless, regression is not a panacea, and should be used as a tool, not the only tool

• Nothing fixes poor research design

Page 32: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Specialized Techniques

• Research for segmentation decisions– Segmentation is an essential part of the marketing

plan, but how do we actually find the segments• Demographics?

– Sometimes useful, but demographics are often a poor predictor of behaviors and attitudes

• Attitudes– Segment customers based on attitudinal info (e.g., “optimists vs.

“pessimists”, “leaders” vs. “followers”)• Benefits

– Segment customers based on benefits sought from product/service

• Behavior– Segment customers based on similar behavior (e.g., “heavy

users”, “light users”)

Page 33: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Cluster Analysis• Cluster analysis is a

technique used to identify groups of ‘similar’ customers in a market (i.e., market segmentation).

• If some customers are very similar to one another but different from other (groups of) customers, cluster analysis can help you identify these (multiple) segments.

Price sensitivity

Bra

nd

Loya

lty

Page 34: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Cluster Analysis

• What is it actually doing?• The algorithm measures the “distance” between

every point and generates a solution which minimizes distances within a cluster and maximizes distances between clusters– Note that this language is very close to how you were

taught to think about the attributes of good segmentation

• What, exactly, is “distance”?– A rare literal example

Page 35: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Cluster Analysis: Baseball• Baseball batters attempt

to hit balls to parts of the field without any defensive players.

• Baseball coaches have seven players to distribute wherever they want on the field.

• Despite this general flexibility, fielders are almost uniformly distributed in the same locations.

• Is that where batted balls tend to land?

Page 36: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Chase Utley

Let’s look at clustering of batted balls for a single player.

Page 37: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011
Page 38: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011
Page 39: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Example: Shopping Attitudes

• V1: Shopping is fun• V2: Shopping is bad for your budget• V3: I combine shopping with eating out• V4: I try to get the best buys while shopping• V5: I don’t care about shopping• V6: You can save a lot of money by comparing

prices

Page 40: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Example: Shopping

• Cluster 1: _______________• Cluster 2: _______________• Cluster 3: _______________

Page 41: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Key Points

• Cluster Analysis allows us to simplify across respondents

• When used effectively, it can guide marketing strategy

• Nevertheless, it is by no means pure computational science. Identifying and labeling clusters requires some interpretation– This is a strength (in flexibility)– And a weakness

Page 42: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Clusters versus Factors

VV11 VV22 VV33 VV44 VV55 VV2020……....

Cluster Analysis

Factor Analysis

Data

Page 43: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Factor Analysis• Factor Analysis can be used for data reduction

(i.e., to reduce the number of variables).• Factor analysis: Summarize the information

contained in a larger number of variables into a smaller number of ‘factors’ without significant loss of information.– Data reduction is important when you need to measure

“fuzzy” concepts like “love,” “trust,” or “satisfaction– Ask a series of questions that tap into the different

components of the concept– Too many variables! Factor analysis can help to reduce

this dimensionality problem

Page 44: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Factor Analysis: Intuition

• Factor analysis assumes that the correlation between a large number of variables is due to them all being dependent on the same small number of “factors”

• Example: Choice of movies– Suppose individuals choose movies based on two

main attributes:• Plot/story line (A1)• Production quality (A2)

– Each individual has a preference for A1 and A2

Page 45: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Example: Choice of Movies

A1 Weight A2 Weight

I can relate to the characters 0.81 -0.02

The movie is visually pleasing 0.07 0.92

Set and costume design are an important part of a movie

-0.13 0.85

Movie features major stars 0.09 0.16

Movie has first-rate special effects

-0.08 0.69

Engaging story-line 0.76 0.12I feel “transported” while watching

0.72 -0.18

Page 46: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Key Points

• Factor Analysis allows us to simplify across measures

• It helps hone in on large difficult concepts that a single item measures poorly

• It has a set of guidelines for interpretation and use (e.g., Eigenvalues > 1, KMO > .6), but it is only slightly less flexible than Cluster Analysis

Page 47: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Key Points• Market Research data is often extremely bulky and

complicated. We need tools simply to make it comprehensible– Cluster Analysis helps with complexity across consumers,

Factor Analysis helps with complexity across measures, Perceptual maps can helpfully present this information

• These analytic tools are well suited to basic strategic concerns– Identifying segments and matching them to preferences

and brand perceptions– In combination they are even better

• Use these tools carefully: Because there is room for interpretation, there is also room for clumsiness (or deceptiveness)

Page 48: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

.

.

.

How do individuals form preferences over a large selection of different brandswithin a product category?

.

.

.

Page 49: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Engine Size HP Type #Doors Brand Price

2.5L 184 Sedan 4 BMW $27,800

4.0L 203 SUV 2 Ford $21,715

6.0L 316 SUV 4 Hummer $48,455

3.0L 215 Sedan 4 Lexus $29,435

2.4L 157 Sedan 4 Toyota $18,970

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Think of different brandsas different combinations of attributes!

Page 50: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Attribute based approach

• Think of a product (a certain car) as a bundle of attributes.

• A consumer prefers a certain car, car A, to another, car B, because the attributes of car A are more appealing to the consumer than the attributes of car B.

• Suppose we assume that consumers form preferences over brands implicitly by forming preferences for the attributes of which the brands consists.

• So if we present certain lists of attributes the consumer can rank these.

Page 51: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Conjoint Analysis

• Conjoint Analysis: A technique that enables a researcher to estimate consumers’ valuations of different attributes– Allows us to understand how consumers make

trade-offs among attributes/characteristics of products and services

– How much are consumers willing to pay/give up to get/avoid different attributes?

Page 52: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Uses of Conjoint Analysis: New Products

• Estimate market share of brands that differ in attribute levels

Page 53: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Uses of Conjoint Analysis: Pricing/Valuation

• Use information about customers’ valuation of attributes to guide pricing strategy for a product line

Page 54: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Uses of Conjoint Analysis: Brand Equity

• Brand name equity• How much is a brand really worth?

or

Page 55: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Assumption of Part-Worth’s

• Total utility = sum of utilities of each attribute

U( ) = u(motorola) + u(pink) + u($149) + u(flip format)+…

U( = ) u(motorola) + u(grey) + u($149) + u(flip format)+…

u(nokia) + u(black) + u($129) + u(candy bar format)+…U( = )

Page 56: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Example: New Job

$100 K $150 K

Salary

Location

Page 57: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Example: New Job

Prospective Employee 1

CityNew York 0.0 (w11)

San Francisco 0.75 (w12)

Salary$100,000 0.0 (w21)

$150,000 0.25 (w22)

Now we can rank jobs for this person:

U(NY,$100K)=0U(NY,$150K)=0.25U(SF,$100K)=0.75U(SF,$150K)=0.25+0.75=1.0

Page 58: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Example: New Job

Prospective Employee 1

CityNew York 0.0 (w11)

San Francisco 0.75 (w12)

Salary$100,000 0.0 (w21)

$150,000 0.25 (w22)

Now we can rank jobs for this person:

U(NY,$100K)=0U(NY,$150K)=0.25U(SF,$100K)=0.75U(SF,$150K)=0.25+0.75=1.0

Page 59: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Example: New Job

Prospective Employee 1

Prospective Employee 2

CityNew York 0.0 (w11) 0.0 (w11)

San Francisco 0.75 (w12) 0.25 (w12)

Salary$100,000 0.0 (w21) 0 (w21)

$150,000 0.25 (w22) 0.75 (w22)

Now we can rank jobs for this person, and compare it to this person:

U(NY,$100K)=0U(NY,$150K)=0.25U(SF,$100K)=0.75U(SF,$150K)=0.25+0.75=1.0

U(NY,$100K)=0U(NY,$150K)=0.75U(SF,$100K)=0.25U(SF,$150K)=0.25+0.75=1.0

Page 60: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Example: New Job

Prospective Employee 1

Prospective Employee 2

CityNew York 0.0 (w11) 0.0 (w11)

San Francisco 0.75 (w12) 0.25 (w12)

Salary$100,000 0.0 (w21) 0 (w21)

$150,000 0.25 (w22) 0.75 (w22)

Now we can rank jobs for this person, and compare it to this person:

U(NY,$100K)=0U(NY,$150K)=0.25U(SF,$100K)=0.75U(SF,$150K)=0.25+0.75=1.0

U(NY,$100K)=0U(NY,$150K)=0.75U(SF,$100K)=0.25U(SF,$150K)=0.25+0.75=1.0

Page 61: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

How do we get the part-worths?

• This is very nice but we don’t know consumers’ valuations of attributes…

• …and consumers probably don’t know their own valuations either!

• A solution: Force consumers to rank different bundles of attributes (i.e., “brands”)

A

B

C

D

E

F

A

C

E

F

B

D

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Page 62: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Conjoint Analysis: Approaches• Traditional Conjoint: Have respondents directly rank or rate

a series of product profiles

• Discrete Choice Models (allows for non-choice)– Also called “Choice Based Conjoint”

• (from Sawtooth Software’s web-site: http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/conjoint-analysis-software)

Conjoint ≈Consider Jointly

Page 63: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Standard Conjoint Analysis: Process

• Develop the set of attributes• Select the levels of each attribute• Obtain an evaluation (rating or ranking) of the product

profiles from respondents• Estimate the part-worths values for each level of each

attribute• Compute importance weights for each attribute

(normalized range)• Aggregation of results across consumers• Evaluate the tradeoffs among attributes• Market simulations• Evaluate accuracy of results

Page 64: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

From Preference to Choice

• Conjoint model predicts utility, not choice• Utility is a continuous, relative measure of preference

for each alternative. Choice is a discrete outcome.• Need a rule to translate preferences to choices:

– First choice rule: Respondent chooses the profile with the highest predicted utility score

– Share of preference rule: Predictions of choice probabilities sum to 1 over the set of stimuli tested.

• First choice rule usually more appropriate for sporadic, non-routine purchases.

• However, both rules are ad hoc

Page 65: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Conjoint Pluses and Minuses• When to use CA:

– Can the product be seen as a bundle of attributes?• Avoid using CA for “image” products

– Are the respondents familiar with the category? • Avoid using CA for new-to-the-world products

– Must know relevant attributes (exploratory research)

• Warnings– CA will not indicate the absence of an important attribute – Attributes should be actionable to the firm– Interpolation between attribute levels ok – but do not

extend beyond the range selected

Page 66: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Key points

• Conjoint is a very popular and frequently useful tool for identifying the underlying utilities of consumers.

• It details the relative value of product attributes and guides product development and competitive pricing.

• Nevertheless, its application is deeply contingent on both the consumer and the product category.

Page 67: Statistical Techniques MAR 6648: Marketing Research February 1, 2011

Summary

• There are a number of useful statistical techniques that can help you understand your data– T-tests, crosstabs, and regression are basic tools

that can make comparisons and show relationships between marketing variables

– Cluster, factor, and conjoint analysis can help you understand your customers’ traits and preferences

• These tools are only effective if you have good research design to start