Status of the Planning Working Group’s (PWG) Efforts

Name

Date

DRAFT 2

Education Process

• Shared and discussed transmission planning practices among Participants

• Identified similarities and differences in the reliability assumptions used by PEC and Duke in their transmission planning processes

DRAFT 3

Exchange of Information

• LSEs provided load and resource forecasts

• LSEs provided dispatch order for their resources

• Duke and PEC coordinated interchange• Contingency and monitored line lists

DRAFT 4

Case Development

• The Base Case has been developed with detailed internal models for Duke and PEC

• Dispatch files for generation maintenance and import cases have been developed

DRAFT 5

Screening Results

• Screening of Base Case and base with generation maintenance cases are completed

• [Add detail based on where we are at on April 18th]

DRAFT 6

Next Steps

• Develop “baseline” reliability plan

• Based on Base Case screening results evaluate import cases to study

DRAFT 7

Potential Import Cases for StudyAlternative Source Sink Sink Net Change Test Level

PJM (AEP) Duke 473 600

SOCO Duke 564 600

TVA Duke 464 600

SCEG Duke 464 600

SC Duke 464 600

CPLE Duke 464 600

PJM (AEP) CPLE 535 600

PJM (VP) CPLE 535 600

SCEG CPLE 600 600

SC CPLE 500 600

DUKE CPLE 500 600

PJM (AEP/AEP) Duke CPLE 1,008 600 / 600

PJM (AEP/VP) Duke CPLE 1,008 600 / 600

PJM (AEP) CPLW 20 20