steering committee draft policy note 1
Embed Size (px)
TRANSCRIPT

Gas Development Master PlanSteering Committee Meeting – 28 March 2013Draft Policy Note 1 : Overview of Gas Resources and Potential

2
Outline
• Conventional gas reserves and resources
• Coal Bed Methane resources
• Shale gas resources
• Assessment of current reserves data management system
• Recommendations

3
Society of Petroleum Engineers Reserves and Resources Definition

4
Conventional resources

5
USGS Assessment Prospective Resources South East Asia , 2010

6
USGS Assessment Prospective Resources Papua New Guinea, Eastern Indonesia and East Timor, 2011

7
Lemigas Assessment, Prospective Resources, 2005

8
BP Migas Assessment, Prospective Resources, 2012

9
Prospective Resources
Body Date Assessment (TCF)
USGS 2011-12 136
Lemigas 2005 228.5
BP Migas 2012 368.9

10
CBM licences

11
CBM In-place Resources

12
CBM In-place Resources

13
Main shale gas potential
Min Energy GIP = 570 TCF
Prospective resources = 142.5 TCF assuming
recovery factor of 25%

14
Overall Supply Situation (TCF)
Conventional CBM Shale Gas Total
Proven reserves 104.71 - - 104.71
Probable reserves 20.00 - - 20.00
Possible reserves 28.18 - - 28.18
Total reserves 152.89 - - 152.89
Contingent resources - - - -
Prospective
resources
368.90 56.00 142.50 567.40
Total resources 368.90 56.00 142.50 567.40

15
International comparison reserve and resource reporting
Country Agency
undertaking
reporting
Agency reporting Reserve reporting
system
Denmark Energy Agency Ministry of
Climate, Energy and
Building
Consistent with
SPE-PRMS
India Directorate
General of
Hydrocarbons
Ministry of Petroleum and
Natural Gas
Not consistent with
SPE-PRMS
Netherlands Ministry of
Economic
Affairs
n/a Consistent with
SPE-PRMS from
2012
Norway Norwegian
Petroleum
Directorate
Ministry of Petroleum &
Energy
Consistent with
SPE-PRMS
Trinidad &
Tobago
Ministry of
Energy and
Energy Affairs
n/a Consistent with
SPE-PRMS
United Kingdom Department of
Energy and
Climate
Change
n/a Consistent with
SPE-PRMS

16
Policy Recommendations
• Indonesia should adopt the SPE Resource Classification and report reserves as proven, probable and possible
• Indonesia should start providing a quantitative assessment of both contingent resources and prospective resources
• This information should be published on an annual basis
• Indonesia should carry out its own technical assessment of prospective resources for CBM and shale gas
• With the activity currently underway in CBM exploration Indonesia should shortly be able to classify some CBM as a contingent resource.