stephanie carlson 1 and william satterthwaite 2 1 department of environmental science, policy &...
TRANSCRIPT
Stephanie Carlson1 and William Satterthwaite2
1 Department of Environmental Science, Policy & Management, UC Berkeley2 NOAA-Fisheries, Santa Cruz
Managing for population diversity and stability: examples and potential hatchery applications
Cal-Neva AFS Annual Meeting, Sacramento: March 27, 2014
Small streams
(low water levels lead to stranding mortality,
intense bear predation)
Large rivers
(stable flows, minimal bear predation)
Lake beaches
(spawning occurs where there is upwelling or wind driven currents, no bear predation, large gravels)
Photo credits: N. Kendall, T. Quinn, A. Hendry
Among population variation in:• phenology,• age complexity & degree of overlapping generations, • fecundity
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
40,000,000
45,000,000
1893 1904 1915 1926 1937 1948 1959 1970 1981 1992
Cat
ch
Naknek-Kvichak
Nushagak
Egegik
Variation among populations
Photo credits: T. Quinn
The biocomplexity of the stock structure has also played an critical role inproviding stability and sustainability. Here we provide evidence for the effects of biocomplexity on sustainability and emphasize that conserving biocomplexity within fish stocks is important for maintaining their resilience to future environmental change. – Hilborn et al. 2003, p. 6564
Hilborn et al. 2003. Biocomplexity and fisheries sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 6564-6568.
Portfolio effect
ECONOMICS1. Portfolio of financial assets2. Invest in diverse assets
Combination of multiple, diverse assets minimizes performance risk of the portfolio
ECOLOGY1. Portfolio of populations within a complex2. Manage for diverse phenotypes
Combination of multiple, diverse populations minimizes performance risk of the portfolio
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005
Quantifying buffering induced by the PE
Pop1
Pop2
Coefficient of variation (S.D. / mean)
Pop1 = 99871 / 198817 = 0.502Pop2 = 74600 / 138757 = 0.538
Adult production
(escapement + catch)
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005
Quantifying buffering induced by the PE
Pop1
Pop2Adult production
(escapement + catch)
Pooled (total) returns
Coefficient of variation (S.D. / mean)
Pop1 = 99871 / 198817 = 0.502Pop2 = 74600 / 138757 = 0.538Pooled returns = 129650 / 337574 = 0.384
Synchronous population dynamics0
10
03
00
50
07
00
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
A
Mainstem Sac.BattleFeatherYubaAmerican
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
0
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
B
MokelumneStanislausTuolumneMercedA
dult
prod
uctio
n (t
hous
ands
)
• 6 / 6 pairwise correlations were positive, 4 of these were significant
• 8 / 10 pairwise correlations were positive, 4 of these were significant
Sacramento Basin
San Joaquin Basin
1957 1962 1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
20
04
00
60
08
00
10
00
12
00
14
00
20
04
00
60
08
00
10
00
12
00
14
00
Adu
lt pr
oduc
tion
(tho
usan
ds)
Sacramento Basin
San Joaquin Basin
Uneven abundance
Habitat diversity
Phenotypic diversity
Diverse (asynchronous) population dynamics
Stabilizing portfolio effect
BRISTOL BAY SALMON Recent research1 has revealed salmon returns to Bristol Bay were 41-77% more stable depending on the scale of aggregation (as measured by reduction in coefficient of variation in production), than the variability in individual stocks
1 Schindler et al. 2010. Population diversity and the portfolio effect in an exploited species. Nature 465: 609-612.
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
40,000,000
45,000,000
1893 1904 1915 1926 1937 1948 1959 1970 1981 1992
Cat
ch
Naknek-Kvichak
Nushagak
Egegik
Spawning Adult
Eggs
Fry
Smolt
Ocean Sub-Adult
Mature Adult
FRESHWATERMARINE
Slide courtesy of C. Phyllis, artwork by J. Moore
Migration date
Timing of ocean entry:Match-mismatch dynamics
Prey availability
Habitat diversity
Phenotypic diversity
Diverse (asynchronous) population dynamics
Stabilizing portfolio effect
Extensive outplanting of hatchery-produced salmon smolts
Merced River
http://www.fisheryfoundation.org/
San Pablo Bay
In 2008, 20.2 million smolts outplanted to San Pablo Bay!
Nimbus Hatchery on the American River
Homogenizing influence of hatcheries
• Simplified life histories (e.g., functional semelparity in steelhead)
• Simplified age structure (age/stage at release, age at maturity)
• Simplified size and timing of release
Central Valley Chinook life history diversity
Habitat diversity
Phenotypic diversity
Diverse (asynchronous) population dynamics
Stabilizing portfolio effect
Habitat lost (e.g., due to dams) and simplified (e.g., due to levees)
Life history homogenization
Synchronous population dynamics
Instability, high risk of collapse
BRISTOL BAY SALMON CENTRAL VALLEY SALMONVS.
Hatchery mgmt