stipulated conditions of environmental clearance...(reliance got separate ec for this land for...

1

Stipulated Conditions of Environmental Clearance

(December 2018)

FOR

Industrial Building of Panasonic India Ltd.

At

Jhajjar, Haryana

For Submission to:

Ministry of Environment and Forests Climate Change (MoEFCC)

Submitted by:

M/s Panasonic India Ltd

ABW Tower, IFFCO Chowk,

M.G.Road, Sector-25, Gurgaon

2

INDEX

CHAPTER DESCRIPTION Page No.

Chapter 1 Introduction 3-4

Chapter 2 Compliance of stipulated conditions of Environment Clearance

5-10

Chapter 3 Details of Environmental Monitoring

11-29

3

Chapter -1 Introduction

1.1 Introduction

M/s. Panasonic India Ltd., had proposed Industrial Building at plot-1, Jhajjhar (Haryana),

had granted Environmental clearance on 19/12/2011, revise EC letter reference no-

SEIAA/HR/2013/295, dated 17.06.2013.This project has been granted environmental

clearance by the State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority, Haryana.

1.2 Purpose of the Report

As per the “Sub Para (i)” of “Para 10” of EIA Notification 2006, it is stated that “It shall be mandatory for the project proponent to submit half-yearly compliance report in respect of the stipulated prior environmental clearance terms and conditions in hard and soft copies to the concerned regulatory authority as per compliance condition mentioned in Environment Clearance Letter. The regulatory authorities in this case are SEIAA, Punchkula, MoEF& CC, Chandigarh and HSPCB, Panchkula. Various scheduled Site Visits were conducted by a team of Experts to Monitor Pollution related parameters as defined by CPCB / HSPCB. Samples for water and soil were also collected by NABL/ MoEF approved laboratory for analysis. Based on the Specific and General Conditions mentioned in the EC Letter, a Compliance Report has been prepared and submitted regularly to the authority. The Environmental assessment has been carried out to verify:

1) The proposed project has not any adverse effect on the project site as well as it’s surrounding.

2) There is compliance with the conditions stipulated in the Environmental Clearance Letter.

3) The Project proponent is implementing the environmental safeguards in true spirit.

4) The non-conformity in the project with respect to the environmental implication of the project.

5) The project proponent is implementing the environmental pollution mitigative measures as suggested in approved Form-1 and Form – 1A, Environmental Management Plan and Building Plan.

4

1.3 Methodology for Preparation of Report is as follows:

1) Study of EC Letter & Related Documents,

2) Site Visits by a Team of Experts,

3) Monitoring of Environment Parameters, viz. Ambient Air, Water, Noise & Soil by the NABL/Moef labs

4) Interpretation of Monitoring Results.

5) Preparation of half yearly Environmental Compliance Report.

1.4 Generic Structure of Report:

1) Purpose of the Report, explaining the need of a Compliance Report and Methodology Adopted for preparation of Report.

2) Compliance Report, explaining the entire General & specific conditions in the EC Letter and providing details w.r.t. each condition/ guideline.

3) Monitoring Reports & Analysis, showing the level of emission within the project site for various Environment Parameters.

4) Photographs showing status of the project and site.

5) Supporting Documents which are mandatory for the project.

5

Chapter -2

Compliance of stipulated conditions of Environment Clearance

PART A: CONSTRUCTION PHASE

Note- Our Project is now in operation phase from December-2012, we had already agreed all construction phase condition stipulated in Environment clearance, now condition are not applicable for us. So please consider as completed.

PART B: OPERATION PHASE

S. No Conditions of Environmental Clearance Status of Compliance

1 The installation STP should be certified by an

independent expert and a report in this regard

should be submitted to the Ministry before the

project is commissioned for operation. Discharge

of treated sewage shall conform to the standards

of the Haryana State Pollution Control Board,

Panchkula.

Sewage Treatment Plant of adequate capacity

has been installed and treated effluents are

being recycled to achieve zero discharge.

2. Rain water harvesting for roof run-off and

surface run-off as per plan submitted should be

implemented. Before recharging the surface

runoff, pre runoff treatment must be done to

remove suspended matter oil and grease.

All measures for Rain water harvesting have

been implemented.

3.

The solid waste generated should be properly

collected and segregated before disposal to the

City Municipal Facility. The In-vessel bio-

conversion technique should be used for

composting the organic waste.

Solid waste generated from the project

mainly in the form of domestic waste. This

waste is being properly segregated and

organic waste converted into bio compost,

manure use for gardening purpose for soil

fertility.

6


4. Any hazardous waste including biomedical

waste should be disposal of as per applicable

Rules & norms with necessary approvals of

Haryana State Pollution Control Board.

All hazardous waste should be disposed of as

per applicable Rules & norms of Central

Pollution Control Board.

5. The green belt design along the periphery of the

plot shall achieve attenuation factor conforming

to the day and night noise standards prescribed

for residential land use. The open spaces inside

the plot should be suitably landscaped and

covered with vegetation of indigenous variety.

Variety of trees and other species of herbs

have been planted in the project area and

green belt maintained as per requirement to

reduce pollution and healthy environment

measure.

6 Incremental pollution loads on the ambient air

quality, noise and water quality should be

periodically monitored after commissioning of

the project.

Environment monitoring has been carried out

every quarter, test result are attached in this

report as Annexure 1.

7 Application of solar energy should be

incorporated for illumination of common areas.

Lighting for gardens and street lighting in

addition to provision for solar water heating. A

hybrid system if fully solar system for a portion

of the apartment should be utilized.

29 KW solar systems installed at factory

common area for lighting purpose,

photograph of solar system attached in the

report.

8 Traffic congestion near the entry and exit points

from the roads adjoining the proposed project

site must be avoided. Parking should be fully

internalized and no public space should be

utilized.

Due to the separate entry and exit points,

there shall be no traffic congestion near the

entry or exit point, separate parking

arrangement for staff and visitor vehicles.

9 A report on the energy conservation measures

confirming to energy conservation norms by

Bureau of Energy Efficiency should be prepared

incorporating details about building materials

The report of energy conservation has been

prepared and submitted to the Regional office

of MoEF & CC.

7


&technology; R & U factors etc and submit to the

Ministry in the three month time.

10 The Project proponent shall get the study of

ground water table/level and quality of ground

water every 2 years and seek fresh permission

from CGWA for further extraction of ground

water, it is further clarified that from DC Jhajjar.

The project proponent shall use water for

horticulture instead of fresh water.

Same should be obeyed and if further

extraction of ground water is required, we

will seek fresh permission from CGWA.

NOC from CGWA enclosed as Annexure-2.

11 The project proponent shall increase the

frequency of monitoring and shall monitor the

data quarterly.

Noted.

12 Hazardous Waste from RO plant shall be

disposed off as per the Hazardous waste

(Management & Handling) Rules-1989 as

amended to date.

Hazardous waste generated from RO plant is

disposed at GEPIL Faridabad, Haryana as per

HSPCB guideline.

13 Proper rainwater harvesting shall be carried out

and disposal of storm water shall not be made

outside the premises without approval from

concerned authority.

In the project area, proper rain water

harvesting pit constructed and over flow

storm water is drained in Reliance drain.

(Reliance got separate EC for this land for

additional measure).

14 The project proponent shall conduct quarterly

medical checkup of villagers in 5km radius from

corporate Environment Responsibility (CER)

fund for pollution related diseases.

One special medical Van has been arranged

for nearby villagers. Panasonic mobile van

visit nearby villages, and organize health

checkup camp, and from time to time

organize health camp for nearby villagers.

8

PART B – GENERAL CONDITIONS

S. No. Conditions of Environmental Clearance

Status of Compliance

1 Monitoring reports should be submitted to the

Ministry and its Regional Office, Chandigarh

We are regularly submitting monitoring

result in six monthly reports to the Regional

Office, Chandigarh.

2. Officials from the Regional Office of MoEF,

Chandigarh who would be Monitoring the

implementation of Environmental safeguards

should be given full cooperation facilities and

documents/data etc. by the project proponent

during their inspection. Complete set of all

documents submitted to SEIAAs shall be

forwarded to the Regional Office of MoEF, GOl,

and Chandigarh.

We will provide full cooperation facilities and

documents/data etc. to the Officials from the

Regional Office of MoEF, Chandigarh who

would be monitoring the implementation of

Environmental safeguards during their

inspection. A complete set of all the

documents submitted to MoEF has been

Forwarded to the CCF, Regional Office of

MoEF, and Chandigarh.

3 In case of any change in the scope of the project

the project would require a fresh appraisal by

Ministry.

In case of any other changes in scope of the

project, we will apply for fresh appraisal.

4. The Ministry reserves the right to add additional

safeguard measures subsequently ,if found

necessary, and to take action including revoking

of the environmental clearance under the

provisions of the

Environmental(Protection)Act,1986 to ensure

effective implementation of the suggested

safeguard measures in a time bound and

satisfactory manner.

Agreed. The Ministry reserves all the rights

and can take action including revoking of the

environmental clearance under the provisions

of the Environmental(Protection)Act,1986

5. All other statutory clearance such as the

approvals for storage of diesel from Chief

Controller of Explosive, Fire Department, Civil

Noted.

9



Aviation Department, Forest Conservation Act,

1980 and wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972

etc.shall be obtained as applicable by project

proponents from the competent authorities.

6. A copy of the clearance letter shall be sent by the

proponent to concerned Panchayat, Zila

Parishad/Municipal Corporation, Urban local

body and the local NGO, if any from whom

suggestions/ representation, if any were

received while processing the proposal. The

clearance letter shall also be put on the website

of the Company by the proponent.

Copy of EC letter submitted to concerned

gram Panchayat Samiti and Zillah Parishad.

7. The project proponent should advertise in at

least two local Newspapers widely circulated in

the region, one of which shall be in the

vernacular language informing that the project

has been accorded environmental clearance and

copies of clearance letter are available with the

Haryana State Pollution Control Board and may

also be seen on the website of the Ministry of

Environmental and Forests at

http:/www.enviro.nic.in.The advertisement

should be made within 7 days from the day of

issue of the clearance letter and a copy of the

same should be forwarded to Regional office of

this Ministry at Chandigarh.

Complied. Advertisements placed in local

Hindi Daily namely Dainik Bhaskar

Chandigarh dated 29.12.11 (at page No. 12)

and English Daily The Tribune Chandigarh

Dated 29.12.11 (at page No. 05), and copy of

newspaper provided to the MoEF & CC

regional office Chandigarh.

8. These stipulations would be enforced among

others, under the provisions of Water

Noted.

10



(Prevention and Control of Pollution) act, 1981,

the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the

Public Liability (Insurance) Act-1991, Forest

Conservation Act, 1980 and EIA notification

2006.

9. Under the provisions of Environment

(Protection) Act 1986 legal action shall be

initiated against the project proponent if it was

found that construction of the project has been

started without obtaining environmental

clearance.

No construction activities related to the

project was started before obtaining

environmental clearance.

10 The project proponent shall also submit six

monthly reports on the status of compliance of

the stipulated EC conditions including results of

monitoring data(both in hard copies as well as

by email)to the respective Regional office of

MoEFCC, the respective Office of CPCB and SPCB.

Six monthly reports in respect of compliance

status of the stipulated EC conditions,

including results of monitored data (both in

hard copies as well as by email) submitted to

the MoEF & CC and other representative

offices from time to time.

11. Environmental clearance is subject to final order

of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the

matter of Goa Foundation Vs. Union of India in

Writ Petition (Civil) N0.460 of 2004 as may be

applicable to this project.

Same should be obeyed.

11

Chapter -3

Details of Environmental Monitoring

3.1 Details of Environmental Monitoring

3.2 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING

3.2.1 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations

Ambient air quality monitoring has been carried out at three locations (three

directions), one being near the gate no-1 (factory main gate), other are near utility

area and gate-2 of the site to assess the ambient air. This will enable to have a

comparative analytical understanding about air quality and the changes in the air

environment in the study area with respect to the condition prevailing. The

locations of the ambient air quality monitoring stations are given in Table 3.1.

Table 3.1 Details of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations

S. No. Location Code Location Name/ Description Environmental Setting

1. AAQ-1 Factory Gate-01 Industrial unit

2. AAQ-2 Factory gate-02 Industrial unit

3. AAQ-3 Factory Utility Area Industrial unit

12

AAQ-1: Factory Gate-01

The Air quality monitoring sampler was placed near factory main gate and follows the

scientific methodology for sampling.

AAQ-2: Factory gate-02

The sampler was placed near gate no-02

AAQ-3: Factory Utility Area

This location is Factory Utility Area.

3.2.2 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Methodology

The duration of sampling of PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NOx, CO was 24 hourly continuous

sampling .The monitoring was conducted for one day at each location. This is to allow a

comparison with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The air samples were

analyzed as per standard methods specified by Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and

IS: 5182.

Fine Particulate Sampler FPS instruments have been used for monitoring Particulate Matter 2.5 (PM2.5 i.e. <2.5 microns), and Respirable Dust Sampler APM 860 was used for sampling Respirable fraction (<10 microns), gaseous pollutants like SO2, and NOx. Bladder and Aspirator bags were used for collection Carbon monoxide samples. Gas Chromatography techniques have been used for the estimation of CO.

Table 3.2 Techniques used for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring

S. No. Parameter Technique Technical Protocol

1 Particulate Matter 2.5 Fine Particulate Sampler, Gravimetric Method

#SOP No. VEL/SOP/01, Section No. SP 63

2 Particulate Matter 10 Respirable Dust Sampler, with cyclone separator, Gravimetric Method

IS-5182 (Part-23)

3 Sulphur dioxide Modified West and Gaeke IS-5182 (Part- II)

4 Oxides of Nitrogen Jacob &Hochheiser IS-5182 (Part-VI)

5 Carbon Monoxide Gas Chromatography IS-5182 (Part-X)

# SOP - As per Laboratory Standard Operating Procedure.

13

3.2.3 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results

The detailed on-site monitoring results of PM 2.5, PM 10, SO2, NOx, CO are

presented in Table 3.3.

Table 3.3 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results

S. No. PARAMETERS AAQ1 AAQ2 AAQ3 NAAQS*

1 Particulate Matter (PM2.5) 49.2 50.6 42.6 60

2 Particulate Matter(PM10) 83.4 89.1 85.9 100

3 Nitrogen Dioxide(NO2) 22.6 26.9 25.2 80

4 Sodium Dioxide(SO2) 12.7 10.2 9.04 80

5 Carbon Monoxide(CO) 0.69 0.72 0.70 4

*NAAQS – National Ambient Air Quality Standards; Schedule-VII, [Rule 3 (3B)], [Part-II-sec.-3(i)] 18.11.2009

3.2.4 Discussion on Ambient Air Quality in the Study Area

Pollution levels at the factory area not exceed the permissible limit of NAAQ. Whereas

PM-10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, CO. was observed within the corresponding stipulated limits

(Limit for PM-100μg/m3, PM2.5 is 60μg/m3, SO2 and NOx: 80 g/m3) at all monitoring

locations.

14

3.2.5 Stack Monitoring

Table 3.4 Details of Stack Monitoring Stations

S. No. Location Code DG Capacity Location

1. DG1 750 KVA C1 Block

2. DG2 500 KVA D2 Block





7. DG7 250 KVA B Block

8. DG8 250 KVA B Block

9. DG9 160 KVA A Block

10. DG10 160 KVA A Block

15

Table- 3.5 DG Stack monitoring Result (last two quarter data)

Parameter PM-(g/Kwh) NOx-(g/Kwh) (CH4) -(g/Kwh) CO-(g/Kwh)

LC-DG01 0.076 0.74 0.27 0.24

LC-DG02 0.076 0.65 0.23 0.33

LC-DG03 0.087 0.62 0.38 0.22

LC-DG04 0.068 0.59 0.44 0.36

LC-DG05 0.083 0.66 0.41 0.36

LC-DG06 0.064 0.40 0.35 0.37

LC-DG07 0.054 0.58 0.22 0.20

LC-DG08 0.077 0.53 0.32 0.36

LC-DG09 0.071 0.69 0.40 0.51

LC-DG10 0.065 0.76 0.39 0.53

Limit (As Per CPCB)

≤0.2g/KWh ≤4.0g/KWh ≤4.0g/KWh ≤3.5g/KWh

16

3.3 AMBIENT NOISE MONITORING

3.3.1 Ambient Noise Monitoring Locations

The main objective of noise monitoring in the study area is to assess the present

ambient noise levels in factory site due to various operational allied activities and

increased vehicular movement and operations of machine. A preliminary

reconnaissance survey has been undertaken to identify the major noise generating

sources in the area. Ambient noise monitoring was conducted at one location at the

main gate of the factory, as given in Table 3.6

Table 3.6 Details of Ambient Noise Monitoring Stations

S. No. Location Code Location Name/ Description Environmental Setting

1. N1 Factory Gate-01 Industrial unit

2. N2 Factory gate-02 Industrial unit

3. N3 Factory Utility Area Industrial unit

3.3.2 Methodology of Noise Monitoring

Noise levels were measured using integrated sound level meter manufactured by

Quest Technologies. The integrating sound level meter is an integrating/ logging

type with Octave filter attachment with frequency range of 31.5 to 16000 Hz. This

instrument is capable of measuring the Sound Pressure Level (SPL), Leq and octave

band frequency analysis.

Noise level monitoring was carried out continuously for 24-hours with one hour

interval starting at 6.00 am hrs. to 6.00 am hrs. The noise levels were monitored on

working day only. During each hour Leq were directly computed by the instrument

based on the sound pressure levels. Lday (Ld), Lnight (Ln) and Ldn values were

computed using corresponding hourly Leq.

17

3.3.3 Ambient Noise Monitoring Results

The location wise ambient noise monitoring results is summarized in Table 3.7

Table- 3.7 Ambient Noise Monitoring Result (Last two quarter)

Location Code

N1 N2 N3

Day Time Night Time

Day Time Night Time

Day Time Night Time

Lmax 69.8 54.7 65.2 57.2 66.9 55.9

Lmin 46.8 37.2 45.3 38.4 43.6 35.9

Leq 54.31 43.68 52.69 42.10 58.31 49.67

CPCB Limits in dB(A) Leq (Silence Zone)

75.0 70.0 75.0 70.0 75.0 70.0

3.3.4 Discussion on Ambient Noise Levels in the Study Area

Day Time Noise Levels (Leq-day):

The day time noise level at all the locations were found to within limits prescribed

for Industrial Building area i.e. 75 dB (A).

Night Time Noise Levels (Leq-night):

The night time noise level at all the locations were found to within limit prescribed

for Industrial Building i.e. 70 dB (A).

18

3.4 GROUND WATER QUALITY MONITORING

3.4.1 Ground Water Quality Monitoring Locations

Keeping in view the importance of ground water, sample was collected from near

project for the assessment.

The sample was analyzed for various parameters. Details of water sampling

locations are given in Table 3.8

Table 3.8 Details of Water Quality monitoring location

S. No. Location Code Location Name/ Description

1. GW Near Project Site

3.4.2 Methodology of Ground Water Monitoring

Sampling of Ground water was carried out from the near project site, collected and

sampling forms are filled in as per the sampling plan. Sample for chemical analysis

was collected in polyethylene carboys. Sample collected for metal content were

acidified to <2 pH with 1 ml HNO3. A sample for bacteriological analysis was

collected in sterilized glass bottles.

Soon after the completion of sampling, chain of custody sheets for the samples are

filled in and then they were transported by road to laboratory for further analysis.

Proper care was taken during packing and transportation of samples. After ensuring

the same the samples were forwarded immediately for analysis.

The samples were analyzed as per the standard procedures specified in 'Standard

Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater' published by American

Public Health Association (APHA) and CPCB. The analytical techniques and the test

methods adopted for testing of ground water are given in Table 2.9

19

3.4.3 Ground Water Quality Monitoring Results The detailed Drinking Water quality

monitoring results are presented in Table 3.9

S.

No. Parameter Test-Method Result Unit

Limits of IS:10500 -2012 Requir

ement (Accept

able Limits)

Permissible limit in the Absence of Alternate

Source 1. pH (at 25 0C) APHA ,4500-H+ B Electrometric

Method

7.56 -- 6.5 to

8.5

No Relaxation

2. Colour APHA ,2120 B, Visual Comparison

Method

*BDL (**DL 5Hazen) Hazen 5 15

3. Turbidity APHA, 2130 B, Nephlelometric

Method

*BDL (**DL 0. 1 NTU) NTU 1 5

4. Odour APHA, 2150 B , Threshold Test

Method

Agreeable -- Agreeab

le

Agreeable

5. Taste APHA , 2160 B, Threshold Test

Method

Agreeable -- Agreeab

le

Agreeable

6. Total Hardness as

CaCO3

APHA , 2340 C, EDTA Titrimetric

Method

152.76 mg/l 200 600

7. Calcium as Ca APHA, 3500 Ca B, EDTA Titrimetric

Method

37.56 mg/l 75 200

8. Alkalinity as CaCO3 APHA , 2320 B, Titrimetric Method 135.00 mg/l 200 600

9. Chloride as Cl APHA, 4500-Cl- B, Argentometric

Method

42.60 mg/l 250 1000

10. #Cyanide as CN APHA , 4500 CN- D *BDL(**DL 0.02 mg/l) mg/l 0.05 No

Relaxation 11. Magnesium as Mg APHA , 3500 Mg B, Calculation

Method

14.35

mg/l 30 100

12. Total Dissolved

Solids

APHA , 2540 C, Gravimetric Method 298.00 mg/l 500 2000

13. Sulphate as SO4 APHA , 4500 E, Turbidimetric

Method

17.45 mg/l 200 400

14. Fluoride as F APHA , 4500-F- D, SPADNS Method 0.79 mg/l 1.0 1.5

15. Nitrate as NO3 IS 3025 (P-34) ,Chromotropic

Method

1.89 mg/l 45 No Relaxation

16. Iron as Fe APHA , 3500-Fe B 1,10

Phenanthroline Method

0.39 mg/l 0.3 No relaxation

17. #Aluminium as Al APHA , 3111 B *BDL(**DL 0.03

mg/l)

mg/l 0.03 0.2

18. Boron APHA, 4500B C, Carmine Method 0.38 mg/l 0.5 1

19. Total Chromium as

Cr

APHA , 3111 B, Direct Air, Acetylene Flame Method

*BDL(**DL 0.03 mg/l) mg/l 0.05 No Relaxation

20. Phenolic

Compounds

APHA, 5530 C Chloroform Extraction

Method

*BDL(**DL 0.001

mg/l)

mg/l 0.001 0.002

21. #Mineral Oil Clause 6 of IS:3025(Part 39) *BDL(**DL 0.01mg/l) mg/l 0.5 No Relaxation 22. Anionic Detergents as

MBAS

APHA, 5540 C MBAS Method *BDL(**DL 0.02 mg/l) mg/l 0.2 1.0

23. Zinc as Zn APHA , 3111 B, Direct Air,

Acetylene Flame Method

0.68 mg/l 5 15

24. Copper as Cu APHA , 3111 B, Direct Air,


0.24 mg/l 0.05 1.5

25. Manganese as Mn APHA , 3111 B, Direct Air,


*BDL(**DL 0.06

mg/l)

mg/l 0.1 0.3

26. Cadmium as Cd APHA , 3111 B, Direct Air,


*BDL mg/l 0.003 No Relaxation

27. Lead as Pb APHA , 3111 B, Direct Air,


*BDL mg/l 0.01 No Relaxation

28. #Selenium as Se APHA , 3114 B, Manual Hydride

Generation

*BDL(**DL 0.01 mg/l) mg/l 0.01 No Relaxation

29. #Arsenic as As APHA , 3114 B, Manual Hydride

Generation

*BDL(**DL 0.01

mg/l)

mg/l 0.01 0.05

30. #Mercury as Hg APHA , 3111 B, Direct Air, Acetylene

Flame Method

*BDL (**DL 0.001

mg/l)

mg/l 0.001 No Relaxation

31. Total Coliform IS 1622,1981(Reaffirmed 2003) <2 MPN/100

ml

Shall not be detectable in any 100 ml sample

32. E. Coli IS 1622,1981(Reaffirmed 2003) Absent MPN/100

ml

Shall not be detectable in any 100 ml sample

20

3.4.4 Discussion on Ground Water Quality in the Study Area

Ground Water Quality in the Study Area has all the parameters within acceptable

limits and it is fit for drinking purpose.

21

3.5 WASTE WATER QUALITY MONITORING

3.5.1 Waste water Quality Monitoring Locations

Sample of waste water was collected from the project site for the assessment of impacts of

the project on discharge point.

Waste water sample was collected from factory ETP & STP location. The details of waste

water sampling locations are given in Table 3.10

Table 3.10 Details of Waste Water Quality Monitoring


1. WW 1 Treated sewage water from STP

2. WW 2 Treated effluent water from ETP

3.5.2 Waste water Quality Results

Table: 3.11Treated sewage Result

*General Standards for Discharge of Environmental Pollutants (Part A): Effluents, as given in Schedule –VI, inserted by Rule 2(d) of

Environment (Protection) Second Amendment Rules, 1993 notified by GSR 422(E) dated 19.05.1993 published in Gazette no. 174 dated

19.05.1993.

S.


*Standards

In-Land Surface Water

Public Sewers

Land for Irrigation

1. pH (at 25 0C) APHA, 4500-H+ B Electrometric

Method 7.52

-- 5.5-9.0 5.5-9.0 5.5-9.0

2. COD APHA, 5220 B Open Reflux Method

135.20 mg/l 250 -- --

3. BOD (3 Days at 27

0C) APHA 5210 C / IS 3025,P-44,

25.03 mg/l 30 350 100

4. Total Suspended

Solids APHA, 2540 D Gravimetric Method 32.60

mg/l 100 600 200

5. Oil and Grease

APHA,5520 B Partition Gravimetric

Method 0.60

mg/l 10 20 10

22

Table: 3.12Treated Effluent (ETP) result

*General Standards for Discharge of Environmental Pollutants (Part A): Effluents, as given in Schedule –VI, inserted by Rule 2(d) of

Environment (Protection) Second Amendment Rules, 1993 notified by GSR 422(E) dated 19.05.1993 published in Gazette no. 174 dated

19.05.1993.

S.


*Standards

In-Land Surface Water

Public Sewers

Land for Irrigation

6. pH (at 25 0C) APHA, 4500-H+ B Electrometric

Method 7.44

-- 5.5-9.0 5.5-9.0 5.5-9.0

7. COD APHA, 5220 B Open Reflux Method

76.58 mg/l 250 -- --

8. BOD (3 Days at 27

0C) APHA 5210 C / IS 3025,P-44,

22.04 mg/l 30 350 100

9. Total Suspended

Solids APHA, 2540 D Gravimetric Method 28.00

mg/l 100 600 200

10. Oil and Grease

APHA,5520 B Partition Gravimetric

Method 0.70

mg/l 10 20 10

23

3.6 SOIL MONITORING

3.6.1 Soil Monitoring Locations

The objective of the soil monitoring is to identify the impacts of project activities on soil

quality and also predict impacts, which have arisen due to execution of various

constructions allied activities. Accordingly, a study of assessment of the soil quality has

been carried out.

To assess impacts of ongoing project activities on the soil in the area, the Physico-chemical

characteristics of soils were examined by obtaining soil samples from selected points and

analysis of the same. Single sample of soil was collected from the project site for studying

soil characteristics, the location of which is listed in Table 3.13

Table 3.13 Details of Soil Quality Monitoring Location


1. S1 Project Site

3.6.2 Methodology of Soil Monitoring

The sampling has been done in line with IS: 2720 & Methods of Soil Analysis, Part-1, 2nd

edition, 1986 of American Society for Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America. The

homogenized samples were analyzed for physical and chemical characteristics (physical,

chemical and heavy metal concentrations).

The samples have been analyzed as per the established scientific methods for Physico-

chemical parameters.

24

3.6.3 Soil Monitoring Results

Single sample of soil is collected from the site to check the quality of soil of the study area

.The Physico-chemical characteristics of the soil, as obtained from the analysis of the soil

sample, are presented in Table 3.14

*SOP-Laboratory Standard Operating Procedure.

#Chromium- This parameter is not covered our NABL scope.

3.6.4 Discussion on Soil Characteristics in the Study Area

The soil in study area is characterized by moderate organic content. The soil quality in the

project area has not been affected by the project activities.

S. No. Parameter Test-Method Result Unit

1. pH (at 25 0C) IS : 2720 (P-26) by pH Meter 7.43

--

2. Conductivity IS:14767 by Conductivity meter 0.325 mS/cm

3. Soil Texture IS : 2720 (P-22, RA2003) Silty Loam --

4. Color SOP , SP-78,Issue No.-01& Issue Date-14/02/2013 Yellowish --

5. Water holding

capacity SOP , SP-81,Issue No.-01& Issue Date-14/02/2013 31.68

%

6. Bulk density SOP , SP-80,Issue No.-01& Issue Date-14/02/2013 1.62 gm/cc

7. Chloride as Cl SOP , SP-85,Issue No.-01& Issue Date-14/02/2013 26.49 mg/100g

8. Calcium as Ca SOP , SP-82,Issue No.-01& Issue Date-14/02/2013 35.12 mg/100g

9. Sodium as Na SOP , SP-84,Issue No.-01& Issue Date-14/02/2013 17.43 mg/kg

10. Potassium as K SOP , SP-84,Issue No.-01& Issue Date-14/02/2013 174.50 kg/hec.

11. Organic Matter IS:2720 (P-22) Titrimetric Method 0.49 %

12. Magnesium as Mg SOP , SP-83,Issue No.-01& Issue Date-14/02/2013 12.40 mg/100g

13. Available Nitrogen as

N IS:14684 Distillation Method 310.00

kg./hec.

14. Available Phosphorus SOP , SP-86,Issue No.-01& Issue Date-14/02/2013 10.76 kg./hec.

15. Zinc (as Zn) USEPA 3050B 4.38 mg/kg

16. Manganese (as Mn ) USEPA 3050B 25.93 mg/kg

17. Lead (as Pb) USEPA 3050B 1.96 mg/kg

18. Cadmium (as Cd ) USEPA 3050B 0.55 mg/kg

19. Chromium (as Cr) USEPA 3050B 0.92 mg/kg

20. Copper (as Cu ) USEPA 3050B 2.90 mg/kg

25

3.7 DG Noise Monitoring Result

Table 3.15 DG noise level in the Study Area (Last six month average data)

DG Noise Monitoring Result (dB)A

DG No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Limit

DG & Capacity(KVA)

250 250 160 160 750 750 750 750 380 500

-

Open the Canopy of D.G. Set

(Leq)

97.43

96.35

98.40

96.18

92.85

98.45 94.34

91.56 96.10 95.35 -

Close the Canopy of D.G. Set (0.5 mtr

Distance) (Leq)

71.83 70.84 72.75 70.40 67.21 72.68 68.80 66.20 70.49 69.83

-

Insertion Loss 25.60 25.51 25.65 25.78 25.64 25.77 25.54 25.36 25.61 25.52

25

Conclusion

All environment monitoring results of ambient air, water, stack monitoring, noise and

waste water and soil result under permissible limit as per define CPCB standard limit.

There is no adverse impact on environment due to the project activities.

26

Site Photographs:

Ambient Air Quality Monitoring

Solar Energy System

Black Benjamin

trees near

administration

block

1-Neem Trees

near main car

parking are

2

27

Ambient Noise Level Monitoring

Waste water sampling

28

Water Sampling

Water Sampling

29

Stack Monitoring