stops rct ford et al 2012
DESCRIPTION
This RCT shows that physiotherapy applied to specific pathoanatomical subgroups of LBP works. Hot off the press from IFOMPT today in Quebec!TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: STOPS RCT Ford et al 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070303/549e7aacb37959744b8b45d3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
3/10/12
1
Specific physiotherapy versus advice for people
with subacute low back disorders
A randomised controlled trial Jon Ford, Andrew Hahne, Luke Surkitt, Matt Richards,
Alex Chan, Sarah Slater, Rana Hinman, Nick Taylor
3 La Trobe University
Clinical practice guidelines • Advice/reassurance for acute/subacute LBP ±
medication for short term relief
• Chronic LBP • Exercise
• Cognitive behavioural approach
• Multi-disciplinary intervention
• Acupuncture
• Opiates
• Variable recommendations for manual therapy due to lack of consistent evidence
4 La Trobe University
Effect size
• Treatment effects are small and of borderline clinical meaningfulness
• Only when compared to “minimal intervention” or “usual care”
• Non-significant effects comparing one treatment to another
(Dagenais et al 2010, Koes et al 2010)
5 La Trobe University
Conclusion
Specific physiotherapy is effective compared to evidence-based advice
Subacute, non-compensable low back
disorders (LBD)
The differences are clinically meaningful
6 La Trobe University
Classification issues
• False assumption of sample homogeneity
• Application of generic treatment protocols
• Dilution of the effect of specific treatment
![Page 2: STOPS RCT Ford et al 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070303/549e7aacb37959744b8b45d3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
3/10/12
2
7 La Trobe University 8 La Trobe University
9 La Trobe University
Issues in classification based RCTs
• Mixing populations (acute – chronic)
• Reinventing the wheel – what about manual therapy?
• Complexity of classification and intervention
• Poorly described and non-reproducible treatment protocols
• “Forcing” patients into one subgroup
10 La Trobe University
Specific Treatment of Problems of the Spine
• The right population - sub-acute, non-compensable
• Well accepted/validated subgroups • Reducible discogenic pain (RDP) • Disc herniation with associated radiculopathy (DHR) • Z-joint dysfunction (MTG) • Non-reducible discogenic pain (NRDP) • Multi-factorial persistent pain (MFP)
• A sophisticated but well described and reproducible classification and treatment protocol
11 La Trobe University
STOPS Randomised
Controlled Trial
DHR RDP MTG NRDP MFP
12 La Trobe University
STOPS Randomised
Controlled Trial
DHR RDP MTG NRDP MFP
Subgroup specific
treatmentEvidence based
advice
Randomisation
![Page 3: STOPS RCT Ford et al 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070303/549e7aacb37959744b8b45d3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3/10/12
3
13 La Trobe University
Evidence-based and time honoured treatment
Subgroup Specific treatment
Disc herniation and non-reducible disc
Manage inflammation, motor control, pacing/posture, pain contingent graded functional restoration, education
Reducible disc Mechanical loading strategies, pacing/posture, tape à motor control
Z-joint Unilateral manual therapy with Maitland style clinical reasoning à motor control
Multi-factorial persistent
Time contingent graded functional restoration, cognitive-behavioural approach, pain education
14 La Trobe University
Aim
Evaluate the effectiveness of specific physiotherapy compared to evidence-based advice for subacute LBD classified into one of five subgroups
15 La Trobe University
Design
• Approval La Trobe University Human Ethics Committee
• 300 participants randomly allocated • Follow-ups at 5-weeks, 10-weeks, 6-months, 12-
months, 24-months
16 La Trobe University
Inclusion/exclusion criteria • Inclusion criteria
• Aged 18-65
• New episode of lumbar related pain between 6 weeks and 6 months
• Exclusion criteria
• Compensable clients
• Post-surgery
• Epidural in the previous 6 weeks
• Cauda equina syndrome
17 La Trobe University
Classification process
• Full assessment (60 minutes) • Each individual clinical test reliable
• Data entered into a purpose built Excel spreadsheet
• Classification subgroup automatically calculated • Eliminate practitioner error in classification
18 La Trobe University
Intervention • 14 clinics across metropolitan Melbourne, 10 treating
physiotherapists
• 10 sessions of specific physiotherapy over 10 weeks
• 2 sessions of advice over 10 weeks (Indahl et al 1995)
• Treatment integrity
• 240 page treatment manual
• 2 day training
• Clinical notes submitted at 3 and 7 weeks
• Monthly telephone hook up
![Page 4: STOPS RCT Ford et al 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070303/549e7aacb37959744b8b45d3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
3/10/12
4
19 La Trobe University
Participant Info Sheets
Diagnosis Program timeframes Treatment options Motor control training Directional preference
exercises Functional restoration
exercises Goal setting
Pacing and graded activity Increase in pain Inflammation Pain versus function Pain management strategies Posture Relaxation Sleep
20 La Trobe University
21 La Trobe University
Treatment protocols
• Algorithmic, sophisticated yet reproducible • Detailed protocols published
(Ford et al 2012a, b, c, d) • Adhering to the key principles
(Maitland 1987, McKenzie 1981, Mayer et al 1985, Saal and Saal 1989)
22 La Trobe University
23 La Trobe University
Outcome measures • Primary outcomes
• Activity limitation (Oswestry) • Leg pain intensity (0-10 numerical rating scale) • Back pain intensity (0-10 numerical rating scale)
• Secondary outcomes • Sciatica frequency and bothersomeness scales • Global rating of change (7-point scale) • Satisfaction with physiotherapy treatment (and results) • Psychosocial status (Orebro) • Quality of life (EuroQol-5D) • Number of work days missed • Interference with work
24 La Trobe University
Analysis
• Between-group effects
• Continuous outcomes
• Linear mixed model with baseline score as a covariate
• Ordinal outcomes
• Mann Whitney U test
• Dichotomous outcomes
• Relative risk, risk difference, and number needed to treat
![Page 5: STOPS RCT Ford et al 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070303/549e7aacb37959744b8b45d3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
3/10/12
5
25 La Trobe University
Results
• 2942 volunteers screened • 300 participants recruited between
25/04/09 and 30/03/12 (10% eligibility rate)
• 16 (5%) didn’t complete the treatment • 7 (2%) didn’t complete outcome measures
26 La Trobe University
Sample characteristics
• 153 men, 147 women • Mean(SD) age of 44(12) years • Duration of back and leg symptoms of 15(10)
and 11(10) weeks respectively
27 La Trobe University
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
0 5 10
Osw
estry
(%)
Time (weeks)
Activity limitation
Advice
Specific physiotherapy
28 La Trobe University
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
0 5 10
Bac
k pa
in (N
RS
)
Time (weeks)
Back pain intensity
Advice
Specific physiotherapy
29 La Trobe University
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
0 5 10
Leg
pain
(NR
S)
Time (weeks)
Leg pain intensity
Advice
Specific physiotherapy
30 La Trobe University
-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
Favours Advice Favours Specific Treatment
OSW
Back pain
leg pain
Baseline
5 weeks
10 weeks
![Page 6: STOPS RCT Ford et al 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070303/549e7aacb37959744b8b45d3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
3/10/12
6
31 La Trobe University
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
5 weeks 10 weeks
Percentage of participants improving by at least 50% on the Oswestry
Specific physiotherapy Advice
P=.233 (5 weeks) P=0.083 (10 weeks)
32 La Trobe University
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
5 weeks 10 weeks
Percentage of participants improving their leg pain on the NRS by at least 50% from baseline
Specific physiotherapy
Advice
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
5 weeks 10 weeks
Percentage of participants improving their back pain on the NRS by at least 50% from baseline
Specific physiotherapy
Advice
P<0.001 (5 weeks) P<0.001 (10 weeks)
33 La Trobe University
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
5 weeks 10 weeks
Percentage of participants improving their leg pain on the NRS by at least 50% from baseline
Specific physiotherapy
Advice
P<0.001 (5 weeks) P<0.001 (10 weeks)
34 La Trobe University
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
5 weeks 10 weeks
Percentage of participants at least "much improved" on the global rating of change scale
Specific physiotherapy
Advice
P<0.001 (5 weeks) P<0.001 (10 weeks)
35 La Trobe University
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
5 weeks 10 weeks
Percentage of participants "very satisfied" with physiotherapy care
Specific physiotherapy
Advice
36 La Trobe University
Discussion
• The first high quality, classification based RCT to show moderate and clinically meaningful effects on subacute, non-compensable LBD
• Secondary outcome measures all support the primary outcome measures
• Low drop out and loss to follow up • If treatment integrity measures are followed the
STOPS protocols are reproducible
![Page 7: STOPS RCT Ford et al 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070303/549e7aacb37959744b8b45d3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
3/10/12
7
37 La Trobe University
Limitations • Development of the classification system
• Methods for development and validation complex
• Time honoured principles/widespread clinical use
• Carefully constructed to concur with original authors
• Influence of participants with PS/neurophysiological factors included in pathoanatomical subgroups
• Lack of placebo control
38 La Trobe University
Where to from here? • Longer term follow up
• Further analysis
• Practitioner factors, treatment effect modifiers, predictors of outcome
• Refinement of the classification system
• SIJ/pelvic pain
• Psychosocial and neurophysiological factors
• Chronic pain
• Placebo controlled trial
39 La Trobe University
Conclusion
Specific physiotherapy is effective compared to evidence-based advice
Subacute, non-compensable LBD
The differences are clinically meaningful
Thank you
Lifecare
La Trobe University
§ Nick Taylor
§ Megan Davidson
University of Melbourne
§ Rana Hinman
§ Tania Pizzari
§ Joan McMeeken
Andrew Hahne Jon Ford Sarah Slater Luke Surkitt Matt Richards
Jus8n Moar | Aidan Rich | Daniel Di Mauro | Ross Lenssen Gabrielle Hunter | Shay Mcleod | Kerryn Dunn | Mark Opar | Joel Laing
Adam Walters | Meghan Dean | Ben Sheat
Thank you
Web: www.STOPSbackpain.com.au Facebook: www.facebook.com/STOPSbackpain Twi8er: @stopsbackpain
![Page 8: STOPS RCT Ford et al 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070303/549e7aacb37959744b8b45d3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
3/10/12
8