strategic options for hospice & palliative care in the era of acos
DESCRIPTION
Presentation at National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization's 26th Annual Management & Leadership Conference, April 2011. One of the presenters is Kyle R. Allen, DO, AGSF, Chief, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Medical Director of Post Acute & Senior Services for Summa Health System.TRANSCRIPT
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Strategic Options for Hospice and Palliative Care in the Era of Accountable Care Organizations
NHPCO 26th Annual Management &
Leadership Conference
April 2011
1
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Presenters
Kyle R. Allen, DO, AGSF
Chief, Division of Geriatric Medicine
Medical Director Post Acute & Senior Services
Summa Health System
75 Arch Street, Ste G1, Akron, OH 44303330-375-3747; [email protected]
Jane Gorwin, RN, BSN, LNC, MA
Senior Home Health and Hospice Consultant
Health Dimensions Group
4400 Baker Rd, Ste 100, Minneapolis, MN 55343
760-250-4558; [email protected]
Jade Gong, MBA, RN
Vice President, Strategic Initiatives
Health Dimensions Group
4012 Nelly Custis Drive, Arlington, VA 22207
703-243-7391; [email protected]
2
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Topics
• Health care reform and its impact on post-acute
and aging services providers
• Strategies for hospice and palliative care
providers
• PEACE model of care
• PACE as an accountable care organization (ACO)
model
3
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Drivers of Partnerships for Future Success for Post-Acute Providers
4
• Accountable Care
Organizations
• Bundled Payment
• Hospital Readmission
Penalties
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Home Health 30-Day Hospital Readmissions by State
5
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Why Post-Acute Is Key to Managing Health Care Costs
6
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Post-Acute Payments by Venue and Condition
7
In ACO-land, expect greater use of subacute skilled nursing and home health
Hospital
Condition
PAC
Average
OP
Rehab
Home
HealthSNF IRF LTCH
Stroke $10,680 $569 $2,478 $8,527 $18,923 $22,070
Hip & Femur
Procedures for
Trauma$10,392 $1,217 $2,595 $8,761 $16,018 $22,738
Cardiac Bypass
with
Catheterization$5,230 $837 $1,778 $5,737 $14,631 $24,526
Heart Failure $4,144 $612 $1,611 $6,462 $14,698 $20,236
Note: Data are preliminary and subject to change. Numbers reflect standardized payment rates and
therefore do not reflect provider-specific adjustments such as the area wage index or DSH payment
adjustments. Spending captures payments for all PAC services that occur within 30 days of discharge from
the hospital.
Source: MedPAC analysis of 5% Medicare claims files 2004 to 2006.
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
ACOs – One of the Ways Health Care Reform will Bend the Cost Curve
• Payment Changes
– Reimbursement cuts
– Value-based reimbursement
– Bundled payments
• Care Delivery System
Changes
– Accountable care
organizations
– Medical homes
– Health information exchange
8
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
How ACOs Provide Accountable Care in a New Delivery System
• Capacity to deliver continuum of care, grounded
in strong primary care and minimal use of high-
cost institutional settings
•Payment rewards slower cost growth so long as
combined with improvements in quality
• Reliable measures of a person’s health assure
that savings are achieved
through improvements in care
9
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Accountable Care Organizations
Medical Group(s)
Community MDs
Medical Home
Accountable Care
Organization
Physician
NetworkAncillaries
Medicare/Other Payers 5,000+ Medicare
fee-for-service
beneficiaries
Accountable for all
Medicare Part A
and Part B service
Requires
integrated provider
network;
successful chronic
care management;
comprehensive
home-based
services
EHR across
settings
Continuum
of Care
Outpatient services
Skilled nursing
Home health
Hospice
Geriatric care management
Non-institutional home-based services
Prevention and wellness programs10
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Medicare ACOs in 2012, But Many ACO Demonstrations Now
11
Tucson, AZ
Louisville, KY
Roanoke, VA
3 Medicare Pilot Sites Many Private Payer Pilots
Medica and Insurers
Torrance, CA
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Medicare ACO Eligibility
Who Can Be An ACO?
• Group practices
• Networks of individual practices
• Partnerships or JV
arrangements between
hospitals and ACO
professionals
• Hospitals employing ACO
professionals
• Such other groups of providers
of services and suppliers as the
Secretary determines
appropriate
12
ACO Professionals
• Doctor of medicine or osteopathy legally authorized to practice medicine and surgery by the State
• Physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist
• Certified registered nurse anesthetist
• Certified nurse-midwife
• Clinical social worker
• Clinical psychologist
• Registered dietitian or nutrition professional
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
How Do You Qualify as a Medicare ACO?
• Become accountable for quality, cost, and overall care
• Formal legal structure to receive and distribute payments for shared
savings
• Have enough primary care physicians
• Have a minimum of 5,000 beneficiaries
• Leadership and management structure that includes clinical and
administrative systems
• Processes to promote evidence-based medicine and patient
engagement, report on quality/cost measures, and coordinate care
• Meet patient-centeredness criteria
• Minimum three-year contract with Medicare
13
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
New Payment Model for Medicare ACOs: Shared Savings
• Current per-capita spending for assigned patients determined from
claims for past three years
• Spending target is determined (Medicare)
• If actual spending lower than target, savings are shared
• IF quality targets are also achieved
14
14
ActualShared Savings
ACO Launched
Target
Projected
Adapted from Brookings Institute
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Sample ACO Calculation
15
* Actual costs for ―assigned‖ population are less than pre-set expected costs based on risk-
adjusted trends
** PGP demonstration gave groups 80% of savings; actual split for ACOs to be determined
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Quality Standards
Met?Yes No Yes
Cost Savings
Achieved?No Yes* Yes*
Medicare FFS
Payment
Medicare
Fee
Schedule
Medicare
Fee
Schedule
Medicare
Fee
Schedule
ACO bonus
payment that
year?
No No
Yes
X% of
Savings**
An
organization
must meet
quality
standards
AND
achieve cost
savings
to earn
bonus
payments
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Three Strategic Partnership Imperatives for Post-Acute and Aging Services Providers
16
Partner with hospitals
and ACOs to address
biggest concerns:
• Length of stay
• Pending
re-admission
penalties
Partner with other
providers to enhance
your
post-acute and
home care continuum
Partner with like
providers to create
one-stop chronic
care management
Strategy includes care transitions management
and electronic health record
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
The New Reality for Aging Service Providers: Partnerships with Other Providers
17
• Provide an array of aging services, not just skilled nursing and
long-term care; be the navigator or partner for services or
venues you do not offer = care management
• Become preferred partner for integrated health systems or
ACOs from whence Medicare dollars will flow
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Strategies for ACO and Hospice-Palliative Care Relationships
Jane Gorwin, RN, BS, MA
Health Dimensions Group
18
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
How Do Palliative and Hospice CareFit into an ACO Model?
•Laying the foundation for a palliative care
framework first
19
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
How Do Palliative and Hospice CareFit into an ACO Model? (continued)
Wellness
Specific Disease Intervention
Chronic Disease Management
• Focus still on interventions only
Interventional Palliation
• Combination medical treatment, comfort care
Hospice
• Focus on comfort, quality of life, symptom control
20
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
What Needs to Change?
• The basic way we work with patients, especially in
one of these three categories:
– Chronic Disease Management
• Need to better identify where a patient is within this trajectory
• Enhance acute to community-based transitional care coordination
– Interventional Palliation
• Educate/enlighten patient and family earlier
• Provide options for patient/family choice
– Hospice Care
• Marketing strategy and partnerships with hospitals and PCP
21
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
What Do ACOs Want from Post-Acute and Aging Services Providers?
• Not likely to be a partner, with ―skin in the game‖, but
rather a contractor
• ACOs will want few PAC provider-contractors who:
√ Can demonstrate value (quality and cost reductions) with credible data
Few 30-day hospital readmissions
High volume of discharges to home
√ Have evidence-based clinical programs for most common SNF-HHA
discharges and a care transitions program between venues
√Have facilities/services that are geographically convenient to primary care
physicians and hospitals
√ Already have positive relationship with hospitals and PCPs
√ Willing and able to be part of health information exchange
22
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Hospice: Well Positioned for the Future
•Aging demographics – baby boomers
• Chronic disease ―explosion‖
• Key offenders:
– Congestive Heart Failure
– Diabetes
– Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder
– Pneumonia
– Parkinson’s – ALS – Dementias
– Depression
23
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Not-for-Profit Accountable Care Readiness Strategy: Aging Services Provider Partnerships
24
• Create a not-for-profit consortium within a market that has
more value than any organization individually
• Benefits:
– One-stop shopping for hospitals and ACOs
– Benchmarks for hospital readmissions
and ongoing comparison
– Post-acute provider partnerships in
geographic areas creating care
continuum with standardized protocols
– Care management projects
– Bundling experiments with Medicare Advantage Plans as we learn
to take risks
– Apply for grants for demonstration projects
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
To Be a “Player” in the ACO Arena
• You have to be ahead of the curve in developing
relationships with hospitals, primary care physician
groups, and even insurers/managed care
• Partnerships must be value-based:
what do you bring?
– Hospital readmission reduction
– Cost reductions for post-acute episode of care
– Care coordination across the continuum
– Chronic care management to reduce ED visits and hospitalizations
– Electronic information exchange
– Ability to share payment risk based on outcomes
25
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Define Your Services: What are You Providing Within the Continuum?
• Palliative Care: interventional and comfort care
focus
– Palliative care in–patient hospital versus home health
• Hospice Care: comfort care and quality of life
focus
– Routine hospice care
– Respite
– Continuous care
– General in patient
26
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Overarching Strategy of Why You Will Benefit an ACO
• Ability to reduce 30-day (+) hospital readmissions
• Ability to reduce emergency/urgent care visits
•Reduce hospital length of stay
• Potentially decrease in-patient hospital mortality
rates
27
KNOW YOUR
DATA AND
SHARE IT!
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Critical Elements for a Successful Strategy Implementation
• Evidence-based practice (interventional PC and
hospice)
– Use of aligned, care protocols
• Patient/family centered—self-care management
driven
– Coaching: motivational interviewing skills
– Patient/Family self goal-setting
– Medication awareness (PHR)
– Self symptom management and interventions
28
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Critical Elements for Successful Strategy
• An integrated care management and health
system navigator approach
• Effective electronic information exchange
– From provider to provider
– Patient/family to provider (tele-health, bio-sensory
technology, video-audio interface)
•Real-time data management decision-making
29
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
What are Some of the Current Challenges?
• Current fiscal realities (shrinking margins)
– Hospitals
– Home Health
– Hospice
• Regulations and future Medicare payment models
are always ―behind‖
– Hospice: limited to 6-month end-of-life prognosis
– Palliative care: not officially recognized
– No specific reimbursement for care management
models…..yet
30
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
More Challenges
• Need for highly sophisticated data management
information systems that will:
– Enhance traditional quality care indicators (pain
management, satisfaction surveys post-death)
– Provide predictive statistical modeling as relates to
primary diagnoses and co-morbid conditions
– Help to identify patients’ clinical and social needs within
their trajectory (chronic disease management,
interventional palliation, hospice)
31
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Next Steps to Move Your Strategy Forward
• Evaluate your current services
– Do you provide what your hospital(s) and PCP(s) need?
– Do you collect the right data?
• Research your most likely ACO partners
– What are their specific needs?
– Get their data: mortality rates, lengths of stay, top
chronic diseases causing the readmissions
32
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Moving Your Strategy Forward
• Develop your presentation to meet with potential
ACO partners: hospitals and PCPs
– Be specific with your data to show how YOU will be
essential to their accountable care organization
• Explore current funding opportunities:
– Shared risk ventures with Medicare Advantage plans
– Grants
– Demonstration projects
•Be proactive to get a ―seat at the
table‖ and start now!
33
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough
34
Mario Andretti.
Kyle R. Allen, DO*Steven Radwany, MD*
Susan Hazelett, MS, RN*Denise Ertle, MSN, RN, CNS* *
Susan Fosnight, RPh, CGP, BCPS* Pamela Moore, PharmD, BCPS*
Patricia Purcell, MSN, RN, CNS* * *Barbara Palmisano, MA * * * *
Ruth Ludwick, PhD, RN.C, CNS* * * * *
* Summa Health System, Health Services Research and Education Institute
* * Area Agency on Aging 10B, Inc. * * * The University of Akron
* * * * Northeastern Ohio Universities Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy
* * * * * Summa Affiliate, Robinson Memorial Hospital
The PEACE Trial is supported by The National Palliative Care Research Center
& the Summa Foundation
Area Agency on Aging, 10B, Inc. | Summa Health System | NEOUCOMKent State University | The University of Akron
PEACE TRIALPromoting Effective Advanced
Care for Elders
Key Points
A National Palliative Care Research Center-funded trial
($154,000 over 2 years)
Collaboration between The University of Akron, Kent
State University, Northeastern Ohio Universities
Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy, the Area Agency
on Aging 10B Inc., and Summa Health System
A randomized controlled pilot study
A palliative care case management intervention for
PASSPORT consumers
Intervention involves collaborative care between a
hospital-based interdisciplinary team, the Area Agency
on Aging, and the consumer’s PCP36
The S.A.G.E. Project(Summa Health System/Area Agency on Aging, 10B/Geriatric Evaluation Project: A Successful Health Collaborative(Est. 1995)
Improving Care through Collaboration: Integration of the Aging Network and Acute and Post Acute Medical Care
Services37
SAGE Goal
S.A.G.E. Project is an example of how to partner with a community agency:
Acute hospital and medical care services; and,
A community-based Area Agency on Aging
Goal: To integrate a comprehensive geriatric hospital-based clinical program with the community aging network to improve the health, functional status, and prevent institutionalization of older adults at risk for nursing home placement.
38
The SAGE Project
A 15-year collaboration partnership
Multiple initiatives, a “cast of thousands”, well maybe 100s,
but you get the point
Common goal to improve the health, well being and
functional status of Akron region frail older adult population
Identified major gaps in the continuum and care processes
from each partner
Searched and defined mutual benefits
Shared mutual threats and concerns
Built trust
Grew and multiplied to other regional systems
Communication, communication, communication
Vision, Vision, Vision, Vision 39
Area Agency on Aging Programs
Mission: To provide older adults andtheir caregivers long-term care choices, consumer protection and education so they can achieve the highest possible quality of life.
Aging Resource Center
PASSPORT Home Care Medicaid Waiver
Assisted Living Medicaid Waiver
Community Services Division
Care Coordination
Alzheimer’s Respite Program
Family Caregiver Support
Elder Rights Division
40
Who were the partners?Summa Health System
Geriatric Medicine Department
6 Hospital System 2,027 licensed beds
61,800 admissions
Level 1 Trauma 113,059 ED visits
Community Locations 4 outpatient health centers
Wellness Institute –
• medically-based fitness
Health Plan 110,000 Covered Lives
16,000 Medicare Risk HMO
Major Teaching Residency and Fellowship Program
Post Acute/Senior Service Line 10 Certified Geriatricians
12 Geriatric Certified APNs
Continuum of Care Acute Care/Acute Rehab/ LTAC/ SNF
Beds
Home Care/ Hospice/ Home Infusion/ HME
SummaCare, Inc.
Summa Akron City Hospital Summa St. Thomas Hospital
Summa Western Reserve
Hospital
41
Summa’sInstitute for Seniors and Post-Acute Care
42
Transitions of Care:AD-LIFE, PEACE, and Bridge to Home
Post-discharge care
management of low income
frail elderly
Advance care planning and
palliative care/geriatric
syndrome management for
low income seniors
Nurse care manager
activation of client
Collaboration between a
hospital-based
interdisciplinary team, Area
Agency on Aging, and PCP
Integration of acute and long-
term care
Transitional care to reduce
readmissions
AD-LIFE trial is supported by the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality Grant # R01 HS014539. PEACE is
funded by the National Palliative Care Research Center.
Both are supported by the Summa Foundation.
Bridge to Home is funded by SummaCare.
The Primary
Care
Physician• Medical model
• Limited time with
patient
The Center for Senior
Health and Senior
Services
• Consult and support across
the continuum including
outpatient, inpatient, house
calls and skilled/long- term
care
• Addresses medical and
psychosocial
The Area Agency on Aging
• Social service model but now
becoming more integrated
• Care management and services for
long-term care
• Limited interaction with PCP
• Addresses functional
abilities/geriatric syndromes but
challenged with high risk enrollees
with multiple chronic illnesses
AD-LIFE,
PEACE, &
SummaCare’s
Bridge to
Home
43
Purpose of the PEACE Pilot Study
This randomized pilot study will determine the
feasibility of a fully powered study to test the
effectiveness of an in-home interdisciplinary palliative
care management intervention to improve the quality of
palliative care for consumers of Ohio’s community-
based long-term care Medicaid waiver
program, PASSPORT
44
Health Care Utilization Experience for Patients with Chronic Conditions: Current Health Care System
Hospitalization prompting
advance care decisions
(often by the family)
Community-dwelling chronically
ill patient with poor symptom
control and coordination of care
whose advance care wishes are
rarely documented
Exacerbation of chronic illness
45
Palliative Care and Advance Care Planning
Independent
Management HospiceAdvance Care Planning
Symptom Management
Disease Management
Diagnosis Death
46
Patient Centered Care
47
Frailty
Advanced Organ Failure
Dementia
Chronic Critical Illness
Cancer
Stroke
Well Older Adults
Osteoporosis
Geriatric syndromes
Peri-operative care
Stable chronic dx
Preventive care
Gait DisordersAIDS
Cancer (<65)
TBI
Cystic Fibrosis
Genetic/
Developmental
Disorders
Pediatric Oncology
Morrison, S . National Palliative Care Research Center
Target Population for the PEACE Pilot Study
New PASSPORT enrollees >60 years old with one of the
following diseases and the corresponding level of severity will
be eligible for inclusion:
CHF and being actively treated (AHA class C)
COPD and on home O2 or nebulizer treatments
Diabetes with renal disease, neuropathy, visual problems, or CAD
End-stage liver disease, cirrhosis
Cancer (active, not history of) except skin cancer
Renal disease on dialysis
ALS with history of aspiration
Pulmonary hypertension
Parkinson’s disease (stages 3 and 4)
48
Enrollment
RN assessors from the AAoA will screen consumers at the time of their initial PASSPORT assessment
RN assessor will obtain HIPAA release
Research nurse will obtain consent and obtain baseline measures
Consumers will be randomized to usual care or the intervention group
49
Intervention
Each Care Manager will have approximately 10 consumers
Care Manager will make 2 home visits centered on symptom
assessment & advance care planning
Care Manager will take her assessment findings to an
interdisciplinary team
Team produces recommendations for consumer & PCP
Care Manager accompanies consumer to 1 PCP visit to assist
consumer in discussing advance care goals with PCP
Care Manager & Palliative Care Nurse supervisor make another
home visit to begin implementation of plan of care
Care Manager follows-up with consumer monthly for 1 yr to
assure team recommendations are implemented
PEACE Intervention
50
OutcomesMeasured at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
5 Domains Measurements made to determine
domain score
1) Symptom management Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale
2) Quality of life/death QUAL-E
3) Relationships Meaning in Life Scale
4) Decision making; care
planning; continuity;
communication; patient
activation
Palliative Outcome Scale, Patient
Activation Measure
5) Depression and anxiety Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
51
Challenges
Getting buy-in from case managers
Education and knowledge gaps
Changing culture of the AAA
Needing to get more top-down support for the
project so AAA CM supported for the project
Not over “medicalizing” the care plans
52
Successes
Strong working relationship and commitment
by the AAoA
A team that has gone from forming to storming,
not yet norming
Culture sensitivity and knowledge between
aging network and acute care sector—
“becoming bilingual”
Outgrowths of other educational projects,
additional funding for PC research, and
bridging the community network and acute
sector53
Additional PEACE Related Projects
A survey of knowledge and attitudes about ACP and
PC sent to all area PCPs. Funded by the Summa
Foundation.
A statewide survey of all care managers at all AAoA
that will examine knowledge and attitudes regarding
ACP and PC. Funded by Northeastern Ohio
Universities Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy.
An educational program to teach AAoA care managers
how to bring PC upstream in the disease process.
Funded by the First Merit Foundation.
54
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
PACE as an ACO Model of Care
Jade Gong, MBA, RN
Health Dimensions Group
55
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Comprehensive Services
• Integrates preventive, acute, and long-term care
services
• All Medicare and Medicaid services, plus
community long-term care services
• No benefit limitations, co-payments,
or deductibles
• PACE is the only fully capitated and integrated
Medicare and Medicaid program to serve frail
nursing home eligibles
56
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
PACE Eligibility Criteria
• 55 years of age or older
• Live in a PACE service area
•Be certified as eligible to receive
a nursing home level of care
• Be able to live safely in the
community at point of enrollment
57
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
PACE Enrollees Snapshot
58
Mean Age 80
Gender75%
women
Average Number of Basic
ADL Deficits3.5
Cognitive Impairment 63%
Average Life Expectancy4.5
years
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
PACE Nationally
• 79 PACE organizations and growing
•31 states
• 20,000 PACE
participants
•100 to 2,000
participants
per program
59
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Home
Care
Nutrition
Personal
Care
OT/PT Transportation
Primary
Care
Activities
Pharmacy
Social
Services
Well-functioning IDT Key to PACE Success
60
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
PACE Network
Specialty Care
Medication Supplies
DME
Transportation
Meals
Personal Care
Subacute Care
Hospital Care
61
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
PACE Payment Sources
• Payment features are unique
• Capitated payment system—per member per
month (PMPM)
• Combines funding from multiple payor sources to
meet all participant needs
62
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Integrated Financing
63
Pooled Capitation
(PMPM)
Medicare Part D
Medicare Medicaid
Private Pay
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
21%
45%
34%
Hospital Home Nursing Home
Place of Death in PACE
53%
20%
Older Americans
64
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Survival in PACE
0
1
2
3
4
5
Median Survival (years)
2.3
3.5
4.2
NH Waiver PACE
• South Carolina
• Two counties
• PACE group same
baseline risk as NH
group
• PACE group higher
baseline risk than
Waiver group
65
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
PACE Core Competencies
• Provider-based model
• Tightly controlled care management and utilization systems
• Serves a nursing home-eligible population in the community when enrolled
• Good health care outcomes, high enrollee satisfaction, and low disenrollment rates
• Established existing program with a proven track record
66
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Opportunities for Hospice and PACE Collaboration in the Delivery of Person-Centered Care
67
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Exploring Common Ground:PACE and Hospice
• Patient centered
• Holistic approach to care
•Utilizes interdisciplinary teams
• Supports caregivers
• Utilizes managed care efficiency
•Receives capitated payment (per diem or per
month)
68
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
Why Should Hospice Develop PACE Programs?
• Meet community needs with broader care options
for frail seniors at the end of life
• Build upon community awareness of hospice
• Draw upon greater stability of multiple revenue
streams
•Greater efficiency through shared allocation of
administrative expenses
69
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group
PACE with Hospice Opportunities for Collaboration
• Each provider can focus on providing
patient-centered care
– Some hospice referrals may be more appropriate
for PACE
– Some PACE referrals may be more appropriate
for hospice
• PACE can utilize hospice expertise through contracting:
– Pain and symptom consultation/pain management
– Use of hospice interdisciplinary team (IDT)
– Training in end-of-life care
– Inpatient hospice facility if needed by participant
70
©2010 Health Dimensions Group©2011 Health Dimensions Group