strategic priorities consultation survey overview
DESCRIPTION
Strategic Priorities Consultation Survey Overview. Strategic Priorities Advisory Committee November 6, 2013. Introduction Survey #1 Respondent overview Priority Selection Analysis Considerations Survey #2 Preliminary Results. Agenda. Survey 1. Oct. 15 – Oct. 23. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Strategic Priorities Consultation Survey OverviewStrategic Priorities Advisory Committee
November 6, 2013
Agenda • Introduction
• Survey #1• Respondent overview
• Priority Selection
• Analysis
• Considerations
• Survey #2• Preliminary Results
Respondent Overview
1700 total respondents
381
215 16
6 127 78233
183
201
8521 35
56
127
53 44
135
11059
35 2648
710
N/A
>10
6-10
3-5
1-2
<1
23
Yrs w/TRU
Respondent Overview
1700 total respondents
Student42%
Alumni22%
Faculty13%
Staff10%
Community7%
Admin5%
Other1%
Sig. over-rep Sig. under-rep
Consistency Across Groups:
6 of 13
We would expect the breakdown by respondent group to be reflected in each priority.
This was the case in the following priorities (top 7 are
highlighted):
• Student Engagement
• Innovative and Accessible Academic
Programming
• Learning and Teaching Innovation
• Life-long Learning
• Research, Scholarly, and Creative
Capacity
• Research-Informed EducationTop 7 priority
Inconsistency Across Groups:
7 of 13
This was not the case in the following priorities
(top 7 are highlighted):
• Flexible Course and Program Delivery
• Partnerships with Educational
Institutions, Communities, and the
Private Sector
• Professional Development
• Community-Relevant Research
• Aboriginal, Local, and Global
Understanding
• Innovation and Entrepreneurship
• School Pride Based on Academic and
Athletic Excellence
Top 7 priority
We would expect the breakdown by respondent group to be reflected in each priority.
Flexible Course & Program Delivery
Partnerships
Professional DevelopmentInconsistent Selection Rates Statistically Sig.
A Closer Look at
the Faculty Response
Group
• Unique perspective• Less frequent priorities
• Flexible Course & Program Delivery
• Partnerships• More frequent priorities
• Research, Scholarly & Creative Capacity
• Aboriginal, Local, Global Understanding
• 13% of total respondents (215)• 67% have been affiliated
with TRU for more than 6 years
A possible area to keep in mind for town halls
A Closer Look at the Student Response Group
• For consideration: students did not rate “Student Engagement” as one of the highest priorities;
• However, we know from other sources (like NSSE and the CUR) that students value the components of student engagement
• 42% of total respondents (710)• 33% have been affiliated
with TRU for less than 1 year
Other Suggeste
d Priorities:
Comment Boxes
• 788 additional priorities were suggested in the comment boxes (460 respondents)
• Grouped into overall themes, including: • Course and program expansion
and development• Experiential learning• Affordable education
• Grouped into original priorities where appropriate
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Counts of All Priorities
Original Suggested
Counts of All Priorities
None of the comment box themes were mentioned frequently enough to change the top 7 priority.
Respondent Overview
1110 total respondents
6-10 yrs
188
N/A
>10 yrs
3-5 yrs
1-2 yrs
<1
515
194182
10175
3112
Preliminary
Respondent Overview
1110 total respondents
Student46%
Alumni18%
Faculty16%
Staff9%
Community3%
Admin7%
Other1%
Preliminary
Overall Priority Ranking
1. Flexible Course & Program Delivery
2. Innovative and Accessible Academic Programming
3. Learning and Teaching Innovations
4. Student Engagement
5. Partnerships with Educational Institutions, Communities, and the Private Sector
6. Professional Development
7. Life-long Learning
1st Group
2nd Group
3rd Group
4th Group
Descriptive Statistical
1st