strategy simulation in experiential learning: soft versus hard skill development
DESCRIPTION
Presentation given by Serge Poisson - de Haro, HEC MontrealTRANSCRIPT
Serge Poisson - de Haro
Experiential Learning CongressESMT Berlin
25-26 November 2010
Our inspiration Use of a competitive strategy simulation at the start of
the MBA program at HEC Montréal.
Four main goals:
“Live” decision-making process of a management team
Self-assessment of skills and experiences by students
Preview of content of MBA program
Team building effort - work together for next 12 weeks.
Feedback of the students always ecstatic
what is happening exactly?
What is happening?
What makes simulation so special?
Sense of reality
Enough illusion of reality to induce real world-like responses
Sense of enjoyment
Excellent feedback from students
Good fit with strategic management objectives?
Strategic management course objectives
To integrate (usually used at end of MBA program) (Stephen, Parente, & Brown, 2002)
interdependent functional areas
analytical process that incorporates multiple perspectives
To develop necessary skills needed to manage firms (Mintzberg & Gosling, 2002)
Simulation in strategic management education
Most realistic business decision-making environment possible in a classroom setting (Hornaday & Curran, 1996).
Join together theory and various real world decisions, and encourage strategic thinking (Faria, 2001)
Understand the integration of several functions of the firm in a bird’s eye view (Keys and Wolfe, 1990)
Widely used (Wolfe & Luethge, 2003), but not as much as cases (Fowler & Scott, 1996)
Why simulation is less widely used than cases? Overemphasis on analytical skills in MBA programs
Learning is less related to professor performance
Professor is expected to give continuous feedback
Time and energy consuming
More insights on our study! Hard versus soft skills (Wagner and Moffett, 2000)
Hard skills are linked to analytical decision making
Technical skills: knowlege in main disciplinary and functionalareas of business
Conceptual skills: ability of problem solving
More insights (Contd.) Hard versus soft skills
Soft skills are linked to dealing with human nature (Elmuti, 2004)
Human skills: people management and interpersonal skills(Helfhill and Nielsen, 2007)
Societal skills: dealing with issues surrounding the firm’senvironment
More insights (contd.)
Conventionally accepted that simulations are useful tools in developing hard skills (Gunz, 1995)
Less accepted that simulations are of use to soft skills development (Kachra and Schnietz, 2008)
Something to explore…
Constructs1st
level Management Skills
2nd
level
Hard Management Skills Soft Management Skills
3rd
level
Technical skills
(H1A)
Conceptual skills
(H1B)
Human skills
(H2A)
Societal skills
(H2B)
4th
level
Accounting/Finance (1Aa)
Production/Logistics (1Ab)
Marketing/Sales (1Ac)
Goal setting (1Ba)
Action orientation (1Bb)
Initiative taking (1Bc)
Helping (2Aa)
Leadership (2Ab)
Relationship (2Ac)
Ethics (2Ba)
Quality of worklife (2Bb)
Org.-env. fit (2Bc)
Research Methodology Data: 200 MBA students representative of MBA students
(high undergraduate GPAs, previous business experience and substantial GMAT scores)
Instrument: use of internet questionnaire before starting and after finishing the simulation
Constructs: measurement of the effectiveness of the simulation method in developing management skills by taking students’ perceptions before and after the use of the simulation.
Research methodology (Contd.) Scale: 5-point Likert scale, 1 standing for minimum
and 5 standing for maximum.
Variables: dependent variable: perception of simulation’s effectiveness
Independent variable: utilization of simulation
Control variables : previous business industry (CV1), educational background (CV2), gender (CV3) and ethics course (CV4)
Method
Quantitative descriptive analysis and regression analyses/ANOVA for inferential purposes
Preliminary results
Before: some students tends to have no or mildopinions while others have very deep beliefs regardingethics
After: number of students at 3 level has diminishedsignificantly whereas number of students at 2 or 4 level has increased (students with strong opinions before remains or increases).
Going through the simulation seems to raise ethicalawareness.
Forthcoming Perform deeper analysis including questions on strategy
and team behavior
Repeat the study with more control variables (incl. ability to track student profile and teams)
Implications: use of simulation at beginning or end of program create different dynamics of learning of soft and hard management skills.
Students with science background perceive a greaterlearning in soft skills whereas students with a social science background perceive more hard skills development.
Thank you! Welcome to your suggestions…
Contact
Serge Poisson-de HaroAssistant Professor in Strategic Management
HEC Montréal
www.hec.ca
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION.