strengthening farm operators’ capacity for climate change adaptation
TRANSCRIPT
Strengthening farm operators’ capacity for climate change
adaptation
Armen R. Kemanian Associate Professor
The Pennsylvania State University
Agroclimatology Project Directors Meeting 18 December 2016
Foreword
It is March 25, 2012 in Central Pennsylvania. March has been unusually warm, and Jeanne the Farmer is getting ready for planting corn ahead of schedule. The soil condition is perfect, the planter is loaded with seed, the fertilizer is in the tank. Yet, Jeanne is pondering if planting corn this early risk exposing the crop to a late frost under the guise of an eventual bumper crop. Jeanne decides to go ahead and plant corn, after all she already paid for a long season hybrid. Four weeks later 60% of the crop is killed by a late frost. Jeanne needs to decide now if it is worth replanting corn, and if so if a short season hybrid should be used, to avoid late maturation and frost again, now in the fall. But, are seeds available? She also heard that climate forecasters predict a strong chance of a drier than usual summer. What does that mean for risk of drought or corn borer damage? There is also strong competition for machinery, and getting a good contractor for the planting timely is becoming challenging. There was a chance of losing that crop to a frost, there were other options - perhaps planting early only 50% of the area? Decision points, uncertainty. Can science and technology help Jeanne deal with the havoc brought up by climate variability? Can the losses be avoided or reduced with a strategy that recognize in advance the existing risks? We think so.
This project is about improving the capacity of farmers to deal with the uncertainty of climate change and variability in agricultural production.
Team members
Rob Weaver, Project Director Econometrics and modeling Armen Kemanian Biophysical modeling and agronomy John Tooker IPM and extension Charlie White Biophysical modeling, agronomy and extension Chris Duffy Hydrological modeling, databases and visualization
Framework
Local CCR Realization
Events
CC Predictions & Scenarios Multiple Time Scales
Predictions & Scenarios
Materials & Supplies
Farm labor
Custom services
Predictions & Scenarios
Output prices Input prices
Local Supply
Realization Events
Local Price Realization
Events
Lon
g-term
/ Me
diu
m-term
/ Pre
-seaso
n / In
tra-seaso
n
Mu
ltiple
ne
sted
time
scale p
lann
ing &
action
Farm Options for Adaptation
Farm Actions: Adaptation
Strategic management problem: Multiple climate and market processes with feedback
Op
tion
s
Info
rma
tio
n Q
ua
lity
• Advanced planning for land use
• Adaptive capacity
– Short-run for field operation choice and timing
– Medium-term for shifts in long-term plans
• Market conditions reflect both realized and anticipated agroecosystem and climate conditions
• Market volatility spans quantity and prices
Farm level decision salient features
• Markets faced by farm operators are local
• Procurement and sales involves – Imperfect and dynamic information with respect to
> supply availability and transaction prices
> extent and timing of demand from buyers
– Transactions are bilateral involving
> Search costs for buyers
> Opportunity costs for suppliers
Procurement and sales model
• Developed to predict prices from bilateral transactions
• Provides basis for farm-level scenario analysis that incorporates salient features of farm-level procurement and sales settings.
Market level model
Provides production and environmental impacts data for econometrics and integrated models
Model helps managing complex reality
Ernst et al 2016 Field Crops Research 186, 107-116
Wh
eat
yie
ld, k
g h
a-1
Actual yield Attainable yield
Climatic Index
Climate, soil, genetics, management and
economic interactions
1. Water balance (includes irrigation, water potential based)
2. Crop growth (includes nutrient uptake, optimization theory)
3. Model plant communities (competition, polycultures)
4. Carbon and nutrient balance (saturation theory)
5. Apply management practices (tillage, fertilization, …)
Cycles notes
Inputs: database + conditioning of Meteorological data Soils data Management data
𝒘 =𝐴
𝐸=
λ 𝒄𝒂 − Γ∗ − 𝑹𝒅 𝒌
𝑟𝑔
1
𝐷
𝒘 ≈λ 𝒄𝒂 − Γ∗
𝒓𝒈
1
𝐷
Model fundamentals
Growth is radiation and transpiration limited
When transpiration is not limited, radiation tends to drive growth, modulated by other factors. When transpiration is limited by the hydraulics of the plant or the supply from the soil, then stomata close and growth becomes proportional to transpiration. This is a simplification of Cowan’s optimization theory, the method has a strong physiological foundation.
White, C.M., A.R. Kemanian, and J.P. Kaye. 2014. Biogeosciences 11(23): 6725–6738.
Carbon and nitrogen cycling
Carbon and nutrient cycling follow saturation theory
- Model discriminates chemical and organic N fertilization - Calibrating for top soil gives reasonable subsoil simulations - Calibrating for the subsoil degrades simulation of topsoil Kemanian et al 2011 Ecological Modeling 222, 1913–1921
Long term simulation of soil C
Corn Rye Soy Wheat Canola Corn Rye Soy Wheat Alfalfa Crop Rotation:
Compost/Fertilizer
0
20
40
60
80
100
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Soil
NO
3- a
t 5
-10
cm
(mg
N/k
g)
Inorganic Fertilizer
Compost
Compost/Fertilizer Compost/Fertilizer Compost/Fertilizer
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
N2
O D
en
itri
fica
tio
n
(kg
N/h
a/d
ay)
Inorganic Fertilizer
Compost
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Nit
rate
Le
ach
ing
(kg
N/h
a/d
ay)
Inorganic Fertilizer Compost
Simulation of N dynamics
1. Use hydrological model to classify field hydrology and soils within a watershed (one time, intense)
2. Create representative fields (soil and CN combinations)
3. Combine with algorithm for rotation selection – no market feedback – no pest simulation (uncoupled)
4. Market feedback (next)
5. Run
6. Display results in decision-friendly format (pending)
Tool operational steps
Tools
GIS - Geographic Information System
TIN - Domain Decomposition: Triangular Irregular Net
FVM - Finite Volume Method
PDE - Partial Differential Equations
PDAE - Differential-Algebraic Equations
C. Duffy, L. Leonard and L. Shu
PIHM
Conestoga Watershed in Lancaster County, PA
Mesh Cells with > 50% Agricultural Land Use
Inform Cycles
Interested in limitations to crop productivity, informed by PIHM • Interrogated average behavior of mesh cells by month • Focused on drivers of transpiration
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00
Ave
rage
Tra
nsp
irat
ion
in A
ugu
st (
mm
/day
)
Average August Water Storage (Saturated + Unsaturated) m
Inform Cycles
0
5
10
15
20
25
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00
Wat
er
Sto
rage
(Sa
tura
ted
+ U
nsa
tura
ted
) m
Average August Infiltration (mm/day)
Interested in limitations to crop productivity, informed by PIHM • Interrogated average behavior of mesh cells by month • Focused on drivers of transpiration
Inform Cycles
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00
Ave
rage
Au
gust
Tra
nsp
irat
ion
(m
m/d
ay)
Average August Infiltration (mm/day)
Interested in limitations to crop productivity, informed by PIHM • Interrogated average behavior of mesh cells by month • Focused on drivers of transpiration
Inform Cycles
Using CN to regulate infiltration rate and Cycles crop yield output
y = 0.975x
y = 0.8763x
y = 0.6795x
y = 0.5212x
y = 0.2683x
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Cro
p B
iom
ass
wit
h N
ew C
urv
e N
um
be
r
(Mg/
ha)
Crop Biomass with Curve Number = 60 (Mg/ha)
CN = 89
CN = 95
CN = 97
CN = 98
CN = 99
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00A
vera
ge A
ugu
st T
ran
spir
atio
n (
mm
/day
) Average August Infiltration (mm/day)
Curve Number 99 97 60
Use Cycles
Decision Support Tool Example
- Set up price series for winter wheat, maize and soybean - Establish planting time window for each crop - Establish soil condition for planting - Add rotational constrains Run (for two soils in this case)
Adding a biomass crop buffer strip greatly reduces N near stream
Why not C-PIHM? Computational demand Maize biomass and soil nitrate concentration in a 5 ha watershed Simulation of 10 years may take 4 to 6 hours
Next steps
1. Use hydrological model to classify field hydrology and soils within a watershed (one time, intense)
2. Create representative fields (soil and CN combinations)
3. Combine with algorithm for rotation selection – no market feedback – (add) pest simulation (currently uncoupled)
4. Market feedback (create “farms” with fields)
5. Run
6. Display results in decision-friendly format (pending)
7. Web-based prototype? This is the ultimate goal