structural

23
Structural syllabus [email protected] Material development by Dr Mostafaei

Upload: mbolouri

Post on 09-Jan-2017

143 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: structural

Structural syllabus

[email protected] development by

Dr Mostafaei

Page 2: structural

Topics to be covered:

1. Definition2. Key feature3. Selection and sequence4. Examples5. Positive and negative characteristics6. Applications

Page 3: structural

Definition • It is The most familiar type of syllabus.• It has a long history.• Synthetic, and associated with cognitive theory• Theory of lg: grammatical or structural aspect

of lg is the basis.• Theory of learning: functional ability arises

from structural ability.• Teaching in terms of form or grammar• Gr: traditional or Latin based

(descriptive/prescriptive terminology)• examples: v, pr, adj, sing, pl, present, past…

Page 4: structural

Domain of analysis: sentence

Classification in terms of semantics

1. Statement2. Declarative3. Question

(interrogative)4. Exclamation5. Conditional

Classification in terms of grammar

1.Simple2.Compound3.complex

Page 5: structural

morphology• Singular/plural markings• Tense markings• Special markings(determiners,

articles, preps, postpositions)• Gender markers• Prefixes and suffixes

Page 6: structural

A key feature: Synthetic1. Analysis of lg:Word freq counts, gr analysis, DA2. Results of analysisIsolated elements to make up the

content such as rules, patterns, and elements

3. Learners synthesize the taught materials

Page 7: structural

How do learners synthesize?1. Learners use the analyzed info available

to them in communication to produce a discourse or check the accuracy of production

2. Analyzed info is transformed from conscious knowledge into unconscious behavior (lg use)

Page 8: structural

3 goals of structural teaching:1) Description/explanations of the rulesLearners are expected to describe the rules

that why an utterance is T/FIn this case explicitly stated rules are needed to

be included in instruction.2) Judgment the acceptability and correction

if neededthe knowledge that is available to NS3) Use the structures accurately

Page 9: structural

Cognitive methods of lg teaching• Cognitive theory: lg is best learnt through

conscious knowledge of forms, rules of combinations

• Examples: ALM, GTM, innovative methods such as SW

• ALM: use behaviorist learning model to implicitly instill structural knowledge

• GTM: present explicit forms and patterns to be used in translation

• Recent methods: identification of the forms, application and practice

Page 10: structural

1) Selection of the content:• It is not a big problem. The Grammatical

structures are well-known• The only problem: the degree of

detailsa) In basic or general way with little

and few exceptionsb) Presented with all intricacies

Page 11: structural

2) Sequencing the contentthere are several criteria to determine the order

• Kelly (1969) historically identified:Complexity (facility)Regularity (grammatical analysis)Productivity(usefulness of the

structure)Problem: facility, there is no objective measure

to determine it and it is just based on T or material writers intuition or experience

Page 12: structural

2) Sequencing the contentthere are several criteria to determine the order• Canale and Swain (1980) identified:Communicative facilityCommunicative generalizability Degree of facilitation of acquisitionPerceptual accessibility Dialectical marked-ness

Page 13: structural

2) Sequencing the contentthere are several criteria to determine the order

• OthersDegree of difference btw the structures in

L1 and L2Learners’ communicative needs for the

structureProblem: sequencing problem is unsolved no single criterionLack of empirical evidence

Page 14: structural

2) Sequencing the content

In practice sequencing decisions are based on:

1) Simplicity2) Frequency3) Learners’ needs

Page 15: structural

Example: 900 (1987)

Page 16: structural

Example: understanding and using English grammar (1981)

Page 17: structural

Eight Positive characteristics:1) Gr competence is the most general component

of CC2) Simple familiarity: the basic outlines are well-

known, finite, and learners are sure what to expect in a given course

3) Easy to describe, agreement on their meaning (n, v, pl, gerund), better defined

4) The most measurable component of CC(finite, clear definition, easy to construct items, easy

to use, availability of any type of evaluation, much of instruction in ranking contexts

Page 18: structural

Positive characteristics:5) (based on Higgs and Clifford’s suggestion-

1982)it prevents later fossilization of learning. the only difference btw successful and unsuccessful learners is early reception of instruction to help them progress beyond a high intermediate stage

6) (based on Monitor theory): structural knowledge plays a limited but well-defined role to monitor, check or self correct if time and learner’s attention allows it. it is helpful for easy rules not complex ones

Page 19: structural

Positive characteristics:7) It provides a basis for corrective FB of

learner’s production and they can be referred to previous instruction, or explanations. The value of overt FB is doubtful.

8) It is value-culture free and can be taught independently if the political, social, religious, and cultural values of English are not desirable in a specific context.

Page 20: structural

Three Negative characteristics 1) Usability, applicability and

transferability of the knowledge however it is learnable (How easily fm knowledge transfers to functional ability?)

It manifest itself in certain types of tests.It has some indirect benefits as it

provides usable lg input and learners develop their own version, but it has few direct benefits.

Page 21: structural

Negative characteristics 2) It can mislead the learners into thinking that

the structure learning is lg learning whereas they are learning info about a lg.

Learners demand learning the structure so as to feel secure regarding the familiarity and clarity of it.

3) Sequencing problems that limit and control the learners not to use structures that haven't been taught. So the errors must be tolerated or ignored. This will lead to the use of controlled communicative activities.

Page 22: structural

Applications • Limited applications: low transferability, limited

role in monitoring1) In teaching context removed from

native speaking communities 2) For political, cultural, religious

reasons, just structural knowledge is wanted.

3) It can serve an organizing framework for other types of instructional content

Page 23: structural