student achievement data displays mathematics reading grade 3 revised: october 30, 2009 official...
DESCRIPTION
3 Grade 3 WASL: Mathematics PerformanceTRANSCRIPT
Student Achievement Data DisplaysStudent Achievement Data DisplaysMathematics & ReadingMathematics & Reading
Grade 3Grade 3
Revised: October 30, 2009
Official WASL ResultsAYP Status
2
WASL WASL MathematicsMathematics: 2006-2009: 2006-2009
Grade 3Grade 3
L o w ell E lem en tar y
3
Grade 3 WASL: Grade 3 WASL: Mathematics PerformanceMathematics Performance
P e rc e n t M e e tin g M a th S ta n d a rd
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Per
cen
t M
eeti
ng
Sta
nd
ard
L o w e ll E le me n tary 49 53 59 49
200 5-06 20 06-0 7 2007-0 8 20 08-09
4
Grade 3 WASL: Grade 3 WASL: Mathematics PerformanceMathematics Performance
P e rc e n t M e e tin g M a th S ta n d a rdS c h o o l, D is tr ic t, & S ta te
0
20
40
60
80
100
Per
cen
t M
eeti
ng
Sta
nd
ard
2005-06 49 71 642006-07 53 72 702007-08 59 72 682008-09 49 69 66
L o w e ll E le m e n tary D istr ic t S ta te
5
Adequate Yearly Progress: Adequate Yearly Progress: Annual Targets for 3Annual Targets for 3rdrd Grade Math Grade Math
MATH Accountability GoalAdequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
29.7
47.3
64.9
82.4
100.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
Perc
ent M
eetin
g St
anda
rd
AYP_Goal
6
Grade 3 WASL–Mathematics: Grade 3 WASL–Mathematics: Adequate Yearly Progress GoalsAdequate Yearly Progress Goals
3 r d G r a d e M a th A Y P
50
0 0
50 55.8
25
0 0
36.6
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0
1 0 0
All
Am
erican
India
n
Bla
ck
His
panic
White
Lim
ited E
nglis
h
Asia
n
Specia
l
Education
Low
Incom
e
M arg in o f E r ro r
P erc ent m ee ting standard (07-08 th ru 0 9-10 G oa l= 64.9 )
G oa l
Lowell E lem enta ry
7
Grade 3 WASL Mathematics: Grade 3 WASL Mathematics: Proficiency Level TrendsProficiency Level Trends
P e rc e n t o f S tu d e n ts S c o r in g in E a c h P e rfo rm a n c e L e v e l M a th G ra d e 3
2229
36
14
2720
48
516
25
41
17
3021
42
8
0
20
40
60
80
100
L evel 1 L evel 2 L evel 3 L evel 4
P er fo rm an ce L eve l
Per
cen
t in
Lev
el
2005-062006-072007-082008-09
D o e s n o t m e e t s ta n d a rd M e e ts s ta n d a rd
Lowell E lem en tary
8
Grade 3 Content:Grade 3 Content:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
M ath - C on ten t
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 48.1 67 .4 64 .3
Lo w ell E lem en tary D is t r ic t S ta te
D ifferen ce b et w een S ch oo l an d S ta te P ercen ts
-16
-50
-25
0
25
50
2008-09
% p
oin
t d
iffe
ren
ce
9
Grade 3 Processes:Grade 3 Processes:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
M ath - P r o cess es
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
8 0
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 39.0 65 .6 67.1
L o w ell E lem en ta ry D is t r ic t S ta te
D iffer enc e be tw ee n S ch oo l an d S ta te P er cen ts
-2 8
-50
-25
0
25
50
2008 -09
% p
oin
t d
iffe
ren
ce
10
Grade 3 Number Sense:Grade 3 Number Sense:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
M ath - N u m b er S en s e
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 45.3 55 .4 53 .7
Lo w ell E lem en tar y D is tr ic t S ta te
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
ent
School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001D iffer ence betw een S ch o o l an d S ta te P er cen ts
-15 -14-8
-50
-25
0
25
50
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
% p
oin
t d
iffe
ren
ce
11
Grade 3 Measurement: Grade 3 Measurement: Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
M at h - M easu rem en t
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 53.3 64.0 61.9
Lo w ell E lem en tary D is tr ic t S t ate
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
ent
School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001D ifferen ce b et w een S ch oo l an d S ta te P ercen ts
-2
-17-9
-50
-25
0
25
50
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
% p
oin
t d
iffe
ren
ce
2006-2008
12
Grade 3 Geometric Sense:Grade 3 Geometric Sense:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
M a th - G e o m e tric S e n s e
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
8 0
1 0 0
% w
ith
sim
ila
r p
erf
orm
an
ce
% 5 3 .3 6 2 .3 6 2 .2
L o w e ll E le m e n ta ry D is tr ic t S ta te
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
ent
School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001D iffer enc e be tw ee n S ch oo l an d S ta te P er cen ts
-14 -11 -9
-50
-25
0
25
50
2 005-06 2006 -07 200 7-08
% p
oin
t d
iffe
ren
ce
2006-2008
13
Grade 3 Probability & Statistics:Grade 3 Probability & Statistics:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
M a th - P ro b a b ility /S ta tis tic s
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
8 0
1 0 0
% w
ith
sim
ila
r p
erf
orm
an
ce
% 4 9 .3 5 6 .1 5 0 .5
L o w e ll E le m e n ta ry D is tr ic t S ta te
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
ent
School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001D iffer en ce betw een S c ho o l an d S ta te P er cen ts
-3-1 3
-1
-50
-25
0
25
50
2005-0 6 2006 -07 2007 -0 8
% p
oin
t d
iffe
ren
ce
2006-2008
14
Grade 3 Algebraic Sense:Grade 3 Algebraic Sense:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
M ath - Alg eb r a ic S en se
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 61.3 69.6 65 .3
L o w ell E lem en tar y D is t r ic t S ta te
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
ent
School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001D iffer en ce b etw e en S ch o o l a nd S ta te P e rc en ts
-7-18
-4
-50
-25
0
25
50
200 5-0 6 20 06-07 200 7-0 8
% p
oin
t d
iffe
ren
ce
2006-2008
15
Grade 3 Solves Problems/Reasons Logically:Grade 3 Solves Problems/Reasons Logically:ComparisonComparison of School to State of School to State
M ath - S o lv es P ro b lem s /R easo ns L og ica lly
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 68.0 7 5.0 68 .8
L o w ell E le m en tar y D ist r ict S ta te
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
ent
School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001D iffer en ce b etw een S c ho o l a nd S ta te P e rc en ts
-16 -1 5
-1
-50
-25
0
25
50
200 5-06 2006-07 2 007-0 8
% p
oin
t d
iffe
ren
ce
2006-2008
16
Grade 3 Communicates Understanding:Grade 3 Communicates Understanding:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Math - C o m m u n icates U n d erstan d in g
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 69.3 72 .8 71.9
L o w ell E lem en tary D ist r ic t S ta te
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
ent
School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001D iffer en ce b e tw een S ch o o l an d S tate P er cen ts
-11
3
-3
-50
-25
0
25
50
2005 -06 2006 -07 2007-08
% p
oin
t d
iffe
ren
ce
2006-2008
17
Grade 3 Make Connections:Grade 3 Make Connections:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
M ath - M ake C o n n ect io n s
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 61.3 66.1 63.2
L o w ell E lem en tary D istr ic t S tate
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
ent
School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001D iffe rence b e tw een S ch o o l an d S ta te P ercen ts
-8 -12-2
-50
-25
0
25
50
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
% p
oin
t d
iffe
ren
ce
2006-2008
18
WASL WASL ReadingReading: 2006-2009: 2006-2009
Grade 3Grade 3
L o w ell E lem en tary
19
Grade 3 WASL Grade 3 WASL Reading PerformanceReading Performance
P e rc e n t M e e t in g R e a d in g S ta n d a rd
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Per
cen
t M
eeti
ng
Sta
nd
ard
L o w ell E lem en tar y 58 55 60 52
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
20
Grade 3 WASL Grade 3 WASL Reading PerformanceReading Performance
P e rc e n t M e e t in g R e a d in g S ta n d a rdS c h o o l, D is t r ic t , & S ta te
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
8 0
1 0 0
Pe
rce
nt
Me
eti
ng
Sta
nd
ard
2005-06 58 73 682006-07 55 74 712007-08 60 74 702008-09 52 74 71
L o w ell E lem en tary D istr ic t S ta te
21
Adequate Yearly Progress:Adequate Yearly Progress: Annual Targets for 3 Annual Targets for 3rdrd Grade Reading Grade Reading
READING Accountability Goal Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend
52.2
64.2
76.1
88.1
100.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
Perc
ent M
eetin
g St
anda
rd
AYP_Goal
22
Grade 3 WASL–Reading: Grade 3 WASL–Reading: Adequate Yearly Progress GoalsAdequate Yearly Progress Goals
3 r d G r a d e R e a d in g A Y P
52.9
0 0
35.7
58.1
25
0 0
43.9
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0
1 0 0
All
Am
erican
India
n
Bla
ck
His
panic
White
Lim
ited E
nglis
h
Asia
n
Specia
l
Education
Low
Incom
e
M arg in o f E r ro r
P erc ent m eeting s tandard (07 -08 th ru 09-10 Goa l= 7 6.1)
G oa l
Lowell E lem e ntary
23
Grade 3 WASL ReadingGrade 3 WASL ReadingProficiency Level TrendsProficiency Level Trends
P e rc e n t o f S tu d e n ts S c o r in g in E a c h P e rfo rm a n c e L e v e l R e a d in g G ra d e 3
1 4
2 9
4 3
1 51927
39
1619 21
36
2418
3038
14
0
20
40
60
80
100
L eve l 1 L evel 2 L eve l 3 L evel 4
P er fo r m an ce L eve l
Per
cen
t in
Lev
el
2 0 0 5 -0 62 0 0 6 -0 72 0 0 7 -0 82 0 0 8 -0 9
D o e s n o t m e e t s ta n d a rd M e e ts s ta n d a rd
Lowe ll E lem entary
24
Grade 3 Comprehension:Grade 3 Comprehension:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
C o m p reh en s io n
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 42.9 69 .7 68 .9
L o w ell E lem en tary D is tr ic t S ta te
D iffe ren ce b etw een S ch o o l an d S ta te P er cen ts
-26
-50
-25
0
25
50
2008-09
% p
oin
t d
iffe
ren
ce
25
Grade 3 Analysis:Grade 3 Analysis:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
An alys is
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 59.7 72.5 71.1
L o w e ll E lem en tar y D ist r ic t S tate
D ifferen ce b etw een S ch o o l an d S tate P er cen ts
-11
-50
-25
0
25
50
2008-09
% p
oin
t d
iffe
ren
ce
26
Grade 3 Comprehension of Literary Grade 3 Comprehension of Literary Text: Comparison of School to StateText: Comparison of School to State
L ite r ar y T ext - C o m p reh en s io n
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 53.3 70 .5 67 .4
L o w ell E lem en tar y D is t r ic t S ta te
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
ent
School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001D iffer en ce b etw een S ch o o l an d S tate P ercen ts
-5
-21-14
-50
-25
0
25
50
2005 -06 2006 -07 2007 -08
% p
oin
t d
iffe
ren
ce
2006-2008
27
Grade 3 Literary Analysis with Thinking Grade 3 Literary Analysis with Thinking Critically: Comparison of School to StateCritically: Comparison of School to State0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPe
rcen
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001L itera ry T ext - An alyz e an d In te rp ret
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 58.7 66 .5 63 .3
L ow e ll E lem en ta ry D ist r ict S tate
D iffe r en ce b e tw een S ch o o l an d S ta te P ercen ts
-12-5 -5
-50
-25
0
25
50
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08%
po
int
dif
fere
nce
2006-2008
28
Grade 3 Informational Comprehension:Grade 3 Informational Comprehension:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
In fo rm at io n a l T ex t - C o m p r ehe n sio n
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 46.7 58.0 55 .4
L o w ell E lem en tar y D ist r ic t S ta te
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
ent
School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001D ifferen ce b etw een S ch o o l an d S tate P er cen ts
-14-19
-9
-50
-25
0
25
50
2005-06 2006-07 2007- 08
% p
oin
t d
iffe
ren
ce
2006-2008
29
Grade 3 Analysis with Thinking Critically:Grade 3 Analysis with Thinking Critically:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
In fo r m at io n al T ext - An a ly z e an d In te r p re t
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 54.7 64 .0 61.1
L ow ell E le m en tary D is tr ic t S t ate
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
ent
School 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001D iffe ren ce b etw e en S ch o o l a n d S tat e P er cen ts
-6-17
-6
-50
-25
0
25
50
200 5-06 2006-07 2007-08
% p
oin
t d
iffe
ren
ce
2006-2008