student learning objectives part 1: an overview leading change 2014 virginia stodola & susan...

41
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES PART 1: AN OVERVIEW LEADING CHANGE 2014 VIRGINIA STODOLA & SUSAN POOLE EFFECTIVE TEACHERS AND LEADERS UNIT

Upload: teresa-mills

Post on 21-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES

PART 1: AN OVERVIEW

LEADING CHANGE 2014

VIRGINIA STODOLA & SUSAN POOLE

EFFECTIVE TEACHERS AND LEADERS UNIT

OBJECTIVES To Gain Knowledge About Using

Student Learning Objectives Within A Teacher’s Evaluation

To Determine Next Steps To Implementing The SLO Process

MULTIPLE SOURCES OF DATA

School-wid

e

data

AND

CLASSROOM

LEVEL DATA

4

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSADE would like to acknowledge the help and support

provided by:

Colorado Dept. of Education

Georgia Dept. of Education

Indiana Dept. of Education

Ohio Dept. of Education

Rhode Island Dept. of Education

Center for Great Teachers and Leaders

Education Council

The Council of Chief State School Officers

The Reform Support Network

WestEd Comprehensive Center, Empirical, and RELWest

6

EDUCATOR EVALUATION & SUPPORT SYSTEM

AzCCRS

Assessments

Teaching Performance

Student Academic Progress

Surveys

HOLISTIC VIEW OF TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS AND USE OF MULTIPLE MEASURES:

ADE Teacher Evaluation Model

50%

33%

17%

Teaching Performance: • Planning and Preparation• The Classroom Environment• Instruction• Professional Responsibilities

Student Academic Progress• Achievement• Growth• College and Career Ready

Surveys• Student Survey• Parent Survey• Peer Review• Self-Reflection

8

STUDENT ACADEMIC PROGRESS

Performance& Surveys 67%

Achievement 13%

Growth20%

College and Career ReadyAchievement

Growth

STATE ASSESSMENT

PRIOR YEAR DATA

Student Efficacy: Attendance and Graduation Rates-Lag Data

Current Year Data for Achievement and Growth

STUDENT ACADEMIC PROGRESS DATA

10

GROUP A TEACHERS Arizona Framework For Measuring Educator Effectiveness – April 2011

Elementary Teachers Grades 2-6Special Education TeachersMath & English Grades 9-10

Science Teachers Grades 4, 8, & 10Reading and Math Interventionists

11

GROUP B TEACHERS Arizona Framework For Measuring Educator Effectiveness – April 2011

CTE Performing Arts Computers P.E. Gr. K-1 Elementary Gr. 7-10 Social

Studies Gr. 7 & 9 Science Gr. 11-12 All Subjects

12

SO WHY USE SLOS?SLOs are one way to assess teacher impact on student performance that involves the teacher in the process of goal setting, monitoring, and assessing of student progress within the expertise of their own content area.

13

WHAT IS A STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVE?

What They Are

Classroom level measures of student growth and achievement

Over the entire course

Standards based content

Specific & Measurable

What They Are Not

Individual lesson objectives

Units of study

Teaching to the test

PLANNING A SYSTEM OF SUPPORT TO MEASURE GROWTH

Determining Prior

Knowledge

Instruction & Assessments

Setting Growth Targets

Interventions

Collecting Data

SLO PROCESS-ADE MODEL1. Determining

Students’ Preparedness

2. Choosing Quality

Assessments

3. Setting SLO Targets

4. Monitoring and Adjusting

Instruction

5. Establishing Summative

Score

What do we expect students to learn?

How will we know if students have learned it?

What will we do if they don’t learn it?

What will we do if they already know it?

Students who start the course having already

mastered significant key knowledge and skills

Students who start the course appropriately prepared to meet

the demands of the course

Students who are in need of an intensive intervention having yet to master prerequisite knowledge and

skillsLOW

ADEQUATE

HIGH

DETERMINING STUDENTS’ LEVELS OF PREPAREDNESS

75%

18

Full Knowledge of Standard

SLO ACHIEVEMENT STATEMENT

75%

Our expectation is that all students should at least reach this threshold

100%

STA

ND

AR

DS

The reality is that some will surpass and some will fall short so the rubric will compensate for adjustment.

19

SLO Summative RubricAchievement and Growth Score

4 3 2 1

100% - 90% of the

students met the SLO

89% - 80% of the

students met the SLO

79% - 60% of the students met

the SLO

Less than 60% of students met

the SLO

80% of 8th grade students will score at least

a 75% on the end-of-course 8th Grade Social Studies

final by May 2015.

85 % of all first grade students will reach

Benchmark on the DIBELS

Composite Assessment by

April 2015

POSITIVE MESSAGINGQuestion Message

“Why focus on “mastery” or “proficiency” of the content for Group B Teachers?

23

SLO GROWTH STATEMENT

A measure of student growth between two points in time in order to master the standards in the content area and to close the achievement gap.

24

OPTION #1: LEVELS OF PREPAREDNESS GROWTH APPROACH

Preparedness of Students

Low

Adequate

High

65% Growth

55% Growth

45% Growth

OPTION #1: LEVELS OF PREPAREDNESS

GROWTH APPROACH

High Level of Preparedness

• All students will increase their growth score by at least 45 %

Adequate Level of Preparedness

• All students will increase their growth score by at least 55 %

Low Level of Preparedness

• All students will increase their growth score by at least 65 %

Differentiates the amount of growth for each individual student based on a prescribed formula and/or rubric

Option #2: Individualized Growth Statement

27

FIRST GRADE DIBELSSLO INDIVIDUALIZED GROWTH

STATEMENTS

Each of the targeted students will move over at least one category on DIBELS by May 2015.

JIGSAW ACTIVITY

1. How do SLOs benefit students? How could using SLOs improve student learning?

2. How do SLOs benefit teachers? Why are they worth the effort?

3. How do SLOs benefit principals? Why should principals prioritize SLO implementation?

CHOOSING QUALITY ASSESSMENTS

30

State-Wide Assessments (i.e., AIMS, Stanford 10, AIMS A, AZELLA)

Content Assessments(Purchased)

Department/Grade Level Developed

Teacher Developed

Performance Based

Leve

l of C

onfid

ence Alignment to AZCCR and

State AssessmentsAlignment to AZCCRS

and State Assessments

Assessment Quality Check!

VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY

Valid: An assessment is valid when the test items are representative of the actual skills/concepts taught and is administered consistently.

 

Reliable: A reliable assessment provides consistent results across different administrations, thus yielding similar results on different occasions.

32

LIFE OF AN ASSESSMENT

Valid & Reliable

Assessment1st Administration

No validity

or reliability

Highly confident of validity and

reliability

33

NOT YET READYMOVING TOWARDS

READINESS

READY TO IMPLEMENT SLOs

The LEA has a limited number of high-quality assessments available.

The LEA is working to develop more high-quality baseline assessments, end-of-course assessments, and formative assessments.

The LEA has high-quality common assessments for all grades and subjects.

PARTNER DISCUSSION

REFLECT ON YOUR LEA/SITE’S CURRENT ASSESSMENTS

34

IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE

•Determine Level of Preparedness

•Choose Assessment

•Collect Baseline Data

•Set SLOs

First Quarter

July-Sept.

• Monitor Progress• Refine Instructional

Strategies• First Observation

Conference• Mid-Year Conference

Second/Third Quarter

Sept.-March

• Collect Data• Summative Evaluation & Conference

Fourth Quarter

April-May

35

All staff demonstrates a shared commitment to implementing the SLO process with fidelity.

Adapted from Great Teachers and Leaders SLO Implementation Continuum

SHARED VISION

36

WHERE ARE WE ON THE SLO PROCESS?

Not yet ready Moving toward the goal

Ready to Implement

NEXT STEPS

Discuss what your next steps will be in implementing

the SLO process.

STAY TUNED FOR THE DEEPER DIVE

SESSION II11:30 – 1:00

39

CONTACT INFORMATION

Susan Poole, Education Program [email protected]

Virginia Stodola, Education Program [email protected]

Steve Larson, Education Program [email protected]

Yating Tang, Director of Program Evaluation, Research and Evaluation602 [email protected]

RESOURCES AND SUPPORT

Add link to ADE Educator Evaluation Website

40

41

INTEREST CARDSI am interested in receiving technical assistance for:

Teacher Evaluation System (All Components)______

Teacher Performance Component_______

Student Academic Progress Component______

Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)_______

Surveys_______

Principal Evaluation System________