student response systems presentation final
DESCRIPTION
Presentation created for Harrisburg University class, March 2010.TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Student Response Systems
LTMS 510Susan Miller
![Page 2: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
QuestionHow many of you have used a student response system?
![Page 3: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Description and purpose History How they work Implementation Benefits Leading tools and Web 2.0 options Considerations Best practice
Objectives
![Page 4: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Student Response Systems
Audience Response System
Electronic Voting System
Personal Response System
CLICKER
S!Classroom Response System
Classroom Communication System
![Page 5: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Student Response Systems
“technology products – combinations of software and hardware – designed to support communication and interactivity in classes” ~ Beatty, 2009
“any system used in a face-to-face setting to poll students and gather immediate feedback in response to questions posed by instructors” ~ Deal, 2007
![Page 6: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Engagement
Collect data
Formative assessment
Purpose
“Three features inherent in interactive white boards have a statistically significant relationship with student achievement. The first is the learner-response device. Using voting devices was associated with a 26 percentile point gain in student achievement.” ~ Robert Marzano, 2009.
![Page 7: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Hollywood and advertising polling◦ 1940s◦ Audience Studies Institute◦ Used knob; later ‘yes’ and ‘no’
University adoption◦ 1960s◦ Rice ◦ Stanford◦ Hard wiring and computers
History ~ 1st generation
![Page 8: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Classtalk ~1985◦ 1st device popular in higher education◦ Funded by National Science Foundation◦ Strong grounding in instruction
1990s◦ eInstruction, Educue◦ New systems easier to use◦ “Clickers”
History ~ 2nd generation
![Page 9: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
College Wi-Fi systems ◦ laptops and Pocket PCs with Windows Mobile
software◦ Project Numina and Numina II, U. of North
Carolina (1999)◦ Class in Hand, Wake Forest U (2001-2003)
3rd Generation – Web-Based
![Page 10: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
How they work ~ Hardware Signal
◦ Radio frequency◦ Infrared◦ Web-based
Hub
Devices
![Page 11: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Stand-alone function ~ for use with any application
Integration with ◦ Office◦ Online Textbooks◦ Classroom management systems ◦ Online educational programs
Software
![Page 12: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Poll results
Reports
Data
![Page 13: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Continues to be a valuable tool
Entertainment
Meetings◦ Engagement◦ Collect large amount of data quickly◦ Portability
Industry
![Page 14: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Most prevalent in math, and medical & other sciences
Most common usage:◦ Assessment (formative, diagnostic, summative)◦ Student engagement◦ Share feedback◦ Discussion-starter
Increasingly positive findings
Universities leading the way◦ University of Wisconsin
Higher Education
![Page 15: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
K~12 Education Usage mirrors higher education
◦ Assessment◦ Engagement◦ Feedback◦ Discussion
Prepare for standardized tests
Provide instructional variety
![Page 16: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Benefits Classroom environment:
◦ Positive affect on attention, engagement, participation and attendance
◦ Anonymity
Learning:◦ Discussion◦ Modification◦ Achievement
Assessment:◦ Regular feedback◦ Teacher and student
![Page 17: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
eInstruction (CPS) Interwrite H-ITT Quizdom Turning Point IWB-specific
Popular Systems
![Page 18: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Poll Everywhere
MobiOde
Web-Based Options
![Page 19: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Level of functioning
Integration
Data management
Cost
Considerations ~ Software and Hardware
![Page 20: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Instructors◦ Familiarity with technology◦ Flexibility◦ Interactive white boards
Audience◦ Age◦ Adaptability◦ Attitude about monitoring
Considerations ~ The Users
![Page 21: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Successful use dependent on good teaching /questioning practice!
Instructor training Audience understanding of use, problem-solving
Allow time for design and use Use class roster and reports
Best Practice
![Page 22: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Do not use for attendance-taking Avoid high-stakes assessment Use frequently throughout a course or unit
Do not over-use within a lesson Use answers to pace the class
Best Practice
![Page 23: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Power of the tool dependent on good teaching practices
Potential for increasing student achievement
Future most secure in K-12 education
Conclusions
![Page 24: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
(2008). What Do Wireless Response Systems Cost?. T+D, 62(6), 88. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database.
Adams, H., & Howard, L. (2009). Clever Clickers: Using Audience Response Systems in the Classroom. Library Media Connection, 28(2), 54-56. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database.
Beatty, I. (2004, February 3). Transforming student learning with classroom communication systems. EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research Research Bulletin, 2004(3), 1-13. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu / ir/ library/ pdf/ ERB0403.pdf
Beckert, T., Fauth, E., & Olsen, K. (2009). Clicker Satisfaction for Students in Human Development: Differences for Class Type, Prior Exposure, and Student Talkativity. North American Journal of Psychology, 11(3), 599-611. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database.
References
![Page 25: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Cain, J., & Robinson, E. (2008). A Primer on Audience Response Systems: Current Applications and Future Considerations. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(4), 1-6. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database.
Deal, A. (2007, November). Classroom response systems [White paper]. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from Carengie Mellon University website: http://www.cmu.edu/ teaching/ resources / PublicationsArchives/ StudiesWhitepapers/ ClassroomResponse_Nov07.pdf
Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., Mestre, J. P., & Laura, W. (1996). Classtalk: A classroom communication system for active learning. In Better education inc. Retrieved March 16, 2010, from http://www.bedu.com/ Publications/ UMASS.html
Edens, K. (2008). The Interaction of Pedagogical Approach, Gender, Self-Regulation, and Goal Orientation Using Student Response System Technology. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(2), 161-177. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database.
References
![Page 26: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. (2005, May 15). Seven things you should know about clickers [Educause learning Initiavie]. Retrieved March 19, 2010, from http://www.educause.edu/ ELI/ 7ThingsYouShouldKnowAboutClick/ 156805
Ferriter, W. (2009). Student Responders: Feedback at Their Fingertips. Educational Leadership, 67(3), 83-84. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database.
Jay, H., Jensen, M., & Moore, R. (2005, July/ August). Manna from heaven or clickers from hell? Journal of College Science Teaching, 34(7), 36-39. Retrieved from http://ctl.stanford.edu/ PRS/ Hatch_Jensen_Moore_PRS _College_Bio.pdf
Kay, R., & Knaack, L. (2009). Exploring the Use of Audience Response Systems in Secondary School Science Classrooms. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 18(5), 382-392. doi:10.1007/s10956-009-9153-7.
References
![Page 27: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Kay, R., & LeSage, A. (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 53(3), 819-827. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.001.
Keller, C., Finkelstein, N., Perkins, K., Pollock, S., Turpen, C., & Dubson, M. (2007). Research-based Practices For Effective Clicker Use. AIP Conference Proceedings, 951(1), 128-131. doi:10.1063/1.2820913.
LaRose, J. (2009). Engage Your Audience. Professional Safety, 54(6), 58-62. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database.
Marzano, R. (2009). Teaching with Interactive Whiteboards. Educational Leadership, 67(3), 80-82. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database.
References
![Page 28: Student Response Systems Presentation Final](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081602/5556cd12d8b42abb428b5510/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Penuel, W., Boscardin, C., Masyn, K., & Crawford, V. (2007). Teaching with student response systems in elementary and secondary education settings: A survey study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 55(4), 315-346. doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9023-4.
Student response systems (SRS). (2010). University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Retrieved March 6, 2010, from http://www4.uwm.edu/ ltc/ srs/
Photos: Classtalk: http://www.bedu.com Turning Technologies: http://www.turningtechnologies.com eInstruction: http://www.einstruction.com/ Poll Everywhere: http://www.polleverywhere.com Responders in public schools: http://www.nytimes.com Responders in industry and higher education: AP Photo and
http://www.gettyimages.com
References