study of 58 ni excited states by (p, p’) inelastic scattering a primer course of experimental...
TRANSCRIPT
Study of 58Ni excited states by (p, p’) inelastic scattering
A primer course of experimental nuclear and particle physics
Osaka University, 2009
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Outline
Introduction Experiment
RAIDEN spectrometer Detectors, electronics & DAQ Online tuning
Data analysis State identification Differential cross section BG treatment Result
Summary Acknowledgements
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Introduction: inelastic scattering
Inelastic scattering: (in a non-relativistic view)
at a given angle …
excitation states are measurable
elastic term excitation termobservable
xinout mEfEE 2
*
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Introduction: spectrometer
Spectrometer = prism Distinguishes particles with
different momentum
Well designed magnets are required to guarantee precise measurement
Bp 2
pE -1<<1
xE in a small range
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
inelastic perturbation
elastic term
Introduction: DWBA
Distorted wave Born approximation 2-step scattering Cross section
“DW”: elastic solution for as the zero order of final wave function
“BA”: only the first order correction from is considered
Refer to “Introduction to nuclear reactions”, G.R. Stachler, 1980
2|| iUfd
d
21 UUU
1U
2U
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Experiment: overview
RAIDEN @ RCNP Proton beam at 53 MeV energ
y from AVF = 2.7 msr (slit), SWPC, p
lastic E-E counters (CH2)m, 58Ni[0.92 mg/cm2] and
nat.Mg[0.58 mg/cm2] ~ 20 hour beam time CAMAC + Tamii DAQ +
PAW N.T. Huong, D.N. Thang, P.W. Zhao,
Y. Lei, Y. Wang, and W. Guo
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Experiment: RAIDEN @ RCNP
RAIDEN spectrometer: NIM 175 (1980) 335
Incredible: 30 years old but still works well!
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Experiment: detectors
Single Wire Proportional ChamberNIM 196(1982)249; NIM 217(1983)441
Signals: • QL, QR position• E1, E2
• EL, ER, Time• EL, ER, Time • RF Time
Side view
BA
A
Q
L
y
“Charge Division”Ar+CO2 5%
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Experiment: detectors
Plastic Scintillater
ex
IV
x
V
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Experiment: targets
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Experiment: electronics
Fast signals Slow signals
Busy-resistant logic
Coincidence logic
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Experiment: online tuning
Electronics: Gain of amplifiers: match the pulse heights CFD tuning: suppress major part of noise Delay tuning: establish coincidence / trigger logic Gate width tuning: match rising time of Int. Amp.
Beam: Identify the elastic peak Adjust magnetic field to exclude the elastic peak Rotate RAIDEN (from 15o to 50o ) during measurement
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Experiment: identification of state
In our experiment, the outgoing particles (p) move in magnetic field of spectrometer like in fig:
Bρ = pout /q
pout ↑→ ρ ↑
& Eout+ Ex +Krecoil = Ein(const)
pout↑→↓Ex(small region~linear)
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
On the other hand:
ρcorresponding
with x →Ex ~x
From data analysis
we get the position
spectrum of proton
(θ=150)
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
By using online analysis, we can
identify g.s and 1st
excited state.Using table 1 refer [1]we can determine L=2+ ,
parity and Ex =1.454Mev of 1st
2+(145
4)
4+(246
0)
2+(303
8)
2+(326
5)
4+(362
1)
3-(4475)
4+(475
5)
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
And also, the L=3- (4475kev) state can be identify by using this table:
For other states
We can identify
by using the assumption
Ex~x (linear)
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
In face, the proportion between Ex and x is second-order linear like in fig
Therefore, by using
this simple way, we can
identify for other scattering
angles.
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Data analysis: run summary
runB [m
T]Brho [Tm]
[deg] [deg]
Tar I [nA] Trig Live Q [nC]
LAB C.M.
001 711.602 1.0674 15 15.2 58Ni 20
Tuning runs002 690.613 1.0359 15 15.2 58Ni 20
003 697.919 1.0469 15 15.2 58Ni 2.25
004 697.93 1.0469 15 15.2 58Ni 30 177270 171667 51408.5
005 697.93 1.0469 20 20.2 58Ni 45 79053 76555 26160.2
007 697.93 1.0469 20 20.2 58Ni 43 44468 43204 14723.0
008 697.93 1.0469 25 25.3 58Ni 35 88817 86947 36346.0
010 697.93 1.0469 30 30.4 58Ni 48-65 145175 141972 91920.8
011 697.93 1.0469 35 35.5 58Ni 68 130913 129030 123316.7
012 697.92 1.0469 40 40.6 58Ni 53 104762 103609 117726.8
013 697.92 1.0469 40 nat.Mg 72 193259 175680 30672.3
014 697.92 1.0469 25 nat.Mg 47 196758 181074 29770.8
015 697.92 1.0469 50 50.7 58Ni 65 84642 83994 162986.1
016 697.92 1.0469 50 nat.Mg 65 199188 186705 47744.0
Sum
mary table
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Data analysis: cross section calculation
Q
Ced , C: the count of the state, Q: the total charge of
incoming beam, the reduced density of target, e the charge of proton, the detecting efficiency, and the solid angle
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Data analysis: background treatment
ADC overflow of measured charge: which cause a pile- up at x = L/2
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Data analysis: background treatment
QL, QR drifts caused by pre-amp resistance / ADC zero level: result in error on x calculation
LLL CQQ *
RRR CQQ *
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Data analysis: background treatment
Drift of PMTs of plastic E counter:
RPLLPLavePL EEE ,, here
signal & BG not orthogonal
300
205
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Data analysis: background treatment
Drift of PMTs of plastic E counter: signal & BG orthogonal now
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Data analysis: background treatment
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Data analysis: d/d & DWBA cal.
Statistic error only.
After BG reduction
Fresco: http://www.fresco.org.uk/
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
We have learned
The excitation states of 58Ni have been measured by inelastic proton scattering at Ep = 53 MeV;
The excitation energy and angular momentum of these excitation state have been determined;
The angular distributions of differential scattering cross section, which are well agreed with the DWBA calculations, have been obtained from the experimental data.
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Summary
Nuclear reaction theory with Born approximation Determination of the angular momentum of excited s
tates Prepare of the target. Detection of charged particles with a single-wire pro
portional chamber and plastic scintillators and their operation.
Electric circuits and a CAMAC based data acquistion system
Data analysis, determination of differential cross section
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Acknowledgements
Osaka University, JSPS, JICA, Department of physics, RCNP, AVF operators
Organizers: Prof. T. KISHIMOTO, Prof. M. NOMACHI, Prof. Y. KUNO, Prof. T. OGAWA, etal. Lectures: Prof. T. NAKANO, Prof. T.YAMANAKA, Prof. M. FUKUDA, etal. Experiment: Prof. Y. FUJITA, Prof. A.TAMII, Prof. H. OKAMURA, Prof. K. HIROTA, Prof. T. ITAHASHI, etal.
All the secretaries, All the participants of this prime school
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Thank you
A primer course of experimental nuclear and particle physics
Osaka University, 2009
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Appendix: elastic term
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Appendix: detector arrangement
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Appendix: timing chart
Trigger
DAQ system
GDG
FIFO
VETO
CCNET BUSY
CCNET BUSYGDG
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Appendix: excited states of 58Ni
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Appendix: d/d & DWBA calculation
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Appendix: d/d & DWBA calculation
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Appendix: d/d & DWBA calculation
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Appendix: d/d & DWBA calculation
Mar. 19, 2009 the Spectrometer Group
Appendix: d/d & DWBA calculation