study of volumetric and viscometric properties on non...
TRANSCRIPT
198
CHAPTER – 5
Study of volumetric and viscometric properties on non aqueous – non electrolyte liquid mixtures
SECTION - A Binary liquid mixtures of propanoic acid with N,N-dimethyl aniline/N,N-diethyl aniline
SECTION - B Propanoic acid with equimolar mixture of (N,N-dimethyl formamide and methanol/ethanol/1-propanol)
199
Introduction
The volumetric and viscometric study of non aqueous – non electrolyte liquid
mixtures enables the determination of some useful thermodynamic and other properties that
are highly sensitive to molecular interactions [1−4]. Knowledge of the temperature
dependence of excess properties of liquid mixtures provides valuable information on the
nature of inter molecular interactions existing among the component molecules [5–7]. The
volumetric and viscometric study of molecular interactions in some non aqueous – non
electrolyte liquid mixtures is presented in this chapter. These molecular interactions are studied
at three different temperatures (303.15, 313.15 and 323.15 K). This chapter is divided into two
sections namely, Section-A and Section-B.
Binary mixtures of Propanoic acid with N,N-dimethyl aniline and N,N-diethyl aniline
are presented in section-A. Thermodynamic properties of liquid acid-base mixtures were
studied by Rattan et al [8], Horacio N. Solimo et al [9] and Begona Garcia et al [10] with
propanoic acid as one component in binary mixtures. Katz et al [11] and Rama Murthy et al
[12-14] studied the volumetric and viscometric properties in binary liquid mixtures of aniline
and substituted anilines such as N-methyl aniline, N,N-dimethyl aniline, N-ethyl aniline,
N,N-diethyl aniline as one component and toluene or n-butanol or m-cresol or o- cresol as
other component. Ghasemi et al [15] reported the densities and viscosities for the binary and
ternary mixtures of 1,4-dioxane+1-hexanol+N,N-dimethylaniline.
Recently, Manukonda et al [16] studied the volumetric, speed of sound data and
viscosity at (303.15 and 308.15) K for the binary mixtures of N,N–diethyl aniline + aliphatic
ketones (C3-C5), + 4-methyl-2-pentanone. Gowrisankar et al [17] reported the volumetric,
speed of sound data and viscosity at (303.15 and 308.15) K for the binary mixtures of N,N-
200
dimethyl aniline + aliphatic ketones (C3–C5), +4-methyl-2-pentanone, +acetophenone,
+cyclic ketones.
Study of volumetric and viscometric properties in propanoic acid with equimolar
mixture of N,N-dimethyl formamide + methanol/ethanol/1-propanol is depicted in section-B.
Previous literature shows that, Kharat and Nikam [18] studied the density and viscosity
studies of binary mixtures of aniline+benzene and ternary mixtures of (aniline+benzene +
N,N-dimethyl formamide) at 298.15, 303.15, 308.15, and 313.15 K. Intermolecular
interaction studies in organic ternary liquid mixtures benzene, chlorobenzene and
nitrobenzene with N,N-dimethyl formamide (DMF) in cyclohexane by ultrasonic velocity
measurements was studied by Thirumaran and Sudha [19]. Densities, excess molar volumes,
viscosity, and refractive indices studies of binary and ternary liquid mixtures of methanol (1)
+ ethanol (2) + 1,2-propanediol (3) at 81.5 kPa were carried out by Zarei et al [20].
In view of the industrial importance of liquid acid-base mixtures, in this chapter we
reported densities (ρ) viscosities (η) of the liquid mixtures and the properties such as
deviation in viscosity (Δη), excess Gibb’s free energy of activation of viscous flow (ΔG*E),
molar volume (Vm), excess molar volume ( EmV ), partial molar volumes ( 1,mV , 2,mV ), excess
partial molar volumes (EmV 1, ,
EmV 2, ), partial molar volumes at infinite dilution (
1,mV ,
2,mV ) and
excess partial molar volumes at infinite dilution ( ,1,
EmV , ,
2,EmV ). The variations of these
properties with composition as well as with temperature are discussed in terms of molecular
interactions existing among the molecules of these mixtures. Deviation/excess properties are
fitted to Redlich-Kister type polynomial equation. The experimental viscosity data of all
binary/equimolar liquid mixtures are correlated with the viscosity models such as Grunberg
and Nissan, Hind et al., Katti and Chaudhrai, and Heric and Brewer.
201
Section A
Binary liquid mixtures of propanoic acid with
N,N-dimethyl aniline/N,N-diethyl aniline
5.A.1 Importance and properties of the chemicals
Propanoic acid (PA) is a naturally occurring carboxylic acid with chemical formula
CH3CH2COOH. It is a clear liquid with a pungent odor and it is used as food preservative
(calcium and sodium propionate). It is miscible with water. The melting and boiling points
are -210C and 1410C respectively. Propanoic acid inhibits the growth of mold and some
bacteria at the levels between 0.1 and 1% by weight. Hence, it is consumed as a preservative
for both animal feed and food for human consumption. It is also useful as an intermediate in
the production of other chemicals, especially polymers, plastics, cosmetics.
N,N-dimethyl aniline (DMA) is an organic chemical compound, a substituted
derivative of aniline with chemical formula C6H5N(CH3)2. It consists of a tertiary amine,
featuring dimethyl amino group attached to a phenyl group. This oily liquid is colourless
when pure, but commercial samples are often yellow. The melting and boiling points are 20C
and 1940C respectively. DMA is a key precursor to commercially important triaryl methane
dyes such as malachite green and crystal violet. It serves as a promoter in the curing of
polyester and vinyl ester resins.
N,N-diethyl aniline (DEA) is a chemical compound with the molecular formula
(C2H5)2NC6H5 . The melting and boiling points are -380C and 2160C respectively. It is used
as an intermediate in the manufacture of dyes, pharmaceuticals and other chemicals, and also
as a reaction catalyst. In organic synthesis, the complex diethyl aniline borane (DEANB) is
used as a reducing agent. Diethyl aniline may be genotoxic because it has been found to
202
increase the rate of sister chromatid exchange. These, aromatic anilines, N,N-dimethyl
aniline, N,N-diethyl aniline are used as intermediates to manufacture dyes, vanillin, and as a
stabilizer for calorimetric peroxidase determination.
5.A.2 Experimental
High purity and Analytical Reagent (AR) grade compounds of propanoic acid, N,N-
dimethyl aniline and N,N-diethyl aniline obtained from LOBA chemicals, India are used in
the present study. All the chemicals are further purified by standard methods [21,22],
distillation, fractional distillation under reduced pressure and only middle fractions were
collected. Finally, after purification method the purity of the propanoic acid, N,N-dimethyl
aniline and N,N-diethyl aniline is found to be w = 0.997, w = 0.993 and w = 0.993
respectively. Before use, the chemicals were stored over 0.4 nm molecular sieves
approximately for 72 hr to remove water content and degassed.
Binary mixtures of propanoic acid with N,N-dimethyl aniline and N,N-diethyl aniline
(PA+DMA and PA+DEA) are prepared by mass in air tight bottles over the entire
composition range of propanoic acid (i.e 0 to 100% of PA). The mass measurements are
performed on a METTLER TOLEDO (Switzerland make) ABB5- S/FACT digital balance
with an accuracy ±0.01mg. The uncertainty in the mole fraction is 10-4. Densities of pure
liquids and their mixtures have been determined by using a 5 cm3 two stem double-walled
Parker & Parker type pyknometer [23].This pyknometer is calibrated with triply distilled
water.
An Ostwald viscometer has been used to determine the viscosity of the liquid
mixture, which is calibrated as described by Subramanyam Naidu and Ravindra Prasad [24]
using triply distilled water. The viscometer was also calibrated using benzene, CCl4 liquids
203
etc at working temperatures. The length of one of the capillary tube of viscometers used in
the present study is 8 cm and its diameter is 0.56 mm. The reproducibility in the measured
parameters density and viscosity are 3 in 105 parts and ± 0.2% respectively.
The experiment is performed at three different temperatures 303.15, 313.15 and
323.15 K. The densities and viscosities measured at 303.15 K and 313.15 K for the pure
liquids used in this investigation are compiled in Table 5.A.1 together with the literature data
[8,11,13] available. These results are in good agreement with the reported data.
5.A.3 Results and discussion
The experimental values of densities (ρ) and viscosities (η) are reported in Tables
5.A.2 and 5.A.3 for DMA+PA and DEA+PA binary mixtures respectively. It has been
observed that the density varies almost linearly with the concentration of propanoic acid as
well as with temperature but the viscosity changes non-linearly showing maxima in all the
systems studied at all temperatures investigated. This type of behaviour could be attributed
to complex formation.
The experimental values of density and viscosity are used to calculate the
deviation/excess properties such as deviation in viscosity, Δη, excess molar volume, EVm and
excess Gibbs free energy of activation of viscous flow, ΔG*E. The deviation/excess
properties are illustrated in Table 5.A.4. The variation of deviation in viscosity with mole
fraction of propanoic acid as shown in Figures 5.A.1 and 5.A.2. Generally, negative values
of Δη indicate the presence of dispersion forces or mutual loss of specific interactions in like
molecules operating in the systems arising due to weak intermolecular interactions and
positive values of deviation in viscosity indicate strong specific interactions [25,26]. The
sign and magnitude of Δη depend on the combined effect of factors such as molecular size,
204
shape, and intermolecular forces. In general ethyl groups are more +I effect than methyl
groups. In DEA the ethyl groups are more electron releasing than methyl groups of DMA on
nitrogen atom. So, the nitrogen in DEA possesses more electron density than in DMA,
therefore DEA is more favoured to accept the proton of the PA. Hence it is an appropriate
reason to support the observed more positive Δη values in propanoic acid + N,N-diethyl
aniline system.
Table 5.A.1 Comparison of densities (ρ) and viscosities (η) of pure liquids with literature data at 303.15 and 313.15 K Component temp. T/K ρ/kg·m-3 η/10-3N·s·m-2
present work literature present work literature Propanoic acid 303.15 982.1 982.0 [8] 0.950 0.9498[8]
313.15 973.4 971.0 [8] 0.848 0.8453[8]
N,N-dimethyl aniline 303.15 948.0 948.0 [13] 1.174 1.173 [11]
313.15 938.5 939.75 [11] 0.982 0.985 [11]
N,N-diethyl aniline 303.15 926.0 925.9 [13] 1.703 1.709 [13]
313.15 917.7 918.0 [13] 1.402 1.402 [13]
205
Table 5.A.2 Experimental values of densities (ρ) and viscosities (η) with mole fraction of propanoic acid, x for N,N-dimethyl aniline + Propanoic acid binary system at 303.15, 313.15 and 323.15 K x T = 303.15 K T = 313.15 K T = 323.15 K
ρ/kg·m-3 η/10-3N·s·m-2 ρ/kg·m-3 η/10-3N·s·m-2 ρ/kg·m-3 η/10-3N·s·m-2
0.0000 948.0 1.174 938.5 0.982 930.7 0.826
0.1020 954.4 1.270 943.7 1.019 934.8 0.843
0.2054 959.8 1.329 949.1 1.058 939.7 0.869
0.3071 964.5 1.386 954.2 1.093 944.5 0.895
0.4092 969.3 1.446 959.2 1.124 949.1 0.920
0.5107 974.0 1.494 964.0 1.149 953.5 0.940
0.6178 978.6 1.545 968.6 1.151 958.0 0.944
0.7083 982.2 1.534 972.2 1.119 961.1 0.912
0.8023 985.3 1.457 975.3 1.060 963.5 0.864
0.8987 986.4 1.225 975.7 0.965 963.5 0.778
1.0000 982.1 0.950 973.4 0.848 961.4 0.706
206
Table 5.A.3 Experimental values of densities (ρ) and viscosities (η) with mole fraction of propanoic acid, x for N,N-diethyl aniline + Propanoic acid binary system at 303.15, 313.15 and 323.15 K x T = 303.15 K T = 313.15 K T = 323.15 K
ρ/kg·m-3 η/10-3N·s·m-2 ρ/kg·m-3 η/10-3N·s·m-2 ρ/kg·m-3 η/10-3N·s·m-2
0.0000 926.0 1.703 917.7 1.402 912.8 1.049
0.1047 933.4 1.801 924.6 1.450 919.5 1.068
0.2096 942.1 2.040 932.8 1.590 926.4 1.173
0.3142 952.1 2.404 942.2 1.765 934.9 1.315
0.4164 963.8 2.910 953.7 2.118 944.3 1.555
0.5177 977.9 3.663 967.3 2.527 955.3 1.865
0.6097 989.1 4.040 977.5 2.880 965.3 2.100
0.7077 996.2 3.968 984.0 2.738 971.3 1.949
0.8123 995.0 3.260 982.7 2.086 974.7 1.510
0.9156 990.9 1.532 980.1 1.247 974.2 0.972
1.0000 982.1 0.950 973.4 0.848 961.4 0.706
207
Table 5.A.4 Calculated values of deviation in viscosities, Δη, excess molar volumes, EmV
and excess Gibbs free energy, ΔG*E with mole fraction of propanoic acid, x for all binary system at 303.15, 313.15 and 323.15 K N,N-dimethyl aniline+propanoic acid N,N-diethyl aniline+propanoic acid
x EmV / Δη/ ΔG*E/ x E
mV / Δη/ ΔG*E/ 10-6m3.mol-1 10-3N·s·m-2 kJ.mol-1 10-6m3.mol-1 10-3N·s·m-2 kJ.mol-1
T =303.15 K 0.0000 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.1020 -0.55 0.1190 268.79 0.1047 -0.73 0.177 338.96 0.2054 -0.89 0.201 454.02 0.2096 -1.51 0.495 840.03 0.3071 -1.10 0.281 626.40 0.3142 -2.29 0.938 1428.44 0.4092 -1.25 0.364 794.98 0.4164 -3.10 1.521 2065.96 0.5107 -1.35 0.434 933.08 0.5177 -3.96 2.350 2784.62 0.6178 -1.36 0.510 1071.60 0.6097 -4.34 2.796 3150.72 0.7083 -1.31 0.519 1092.57 0.7077 -4.07 2.798 3233.22 0.8023 -1.16 0.463 1000.37 0.8123 -2.89 2.169 2879.75 0.8987 -0.80 0.253 599.88 0.9156 -1.51 0.519 1103.60 1.0000 0.00 0.000 0.00 1.0000 0.00 0.000 0.00 T =313.15 K 0.0000 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.1020 -0.40 0.050 154.36 0.1047 -0.67 0.106 271.21 0.2054 -0.75 0.103 308.96 0.2096 -1.39 0.304 683.59 0.3071 -1.00 0.152 444.26 0.3142 -2.11 0.537 1115.45 0.4092 -1.19 0.197 563.42 0.4164 -2.93 0.947 1730.10 0.5107 -1.29 0.236 661.49 0.5177 -3.77 1.412 2312.60 0.6178 -1.30 0.252 703.33 0.6097 -4.08 1.816 2759.00 0.7083 -1.24 0.232 656.09 0.7077 -3.78 1.728 2739.68 0.8023 -1.09 0.186 537.39 0.8123 -2.60 1.135 2157.44 0.8987 -0.66 0.103 314.66 0.9156 -1.35 0.353 923.99 1.0000 0.00 0.000 0.00 1.0000 0.00 0.000 0.00 T =323.15 K 0.0000 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.1020 -0.29 0.030 121.77 0.1047 -0.70 0.055 206.00 0.2054 -0.63 0.068 264.12 0.2096 -1.29 0.196 608.00 0.3071 -0.90 0.106 396.53 0.3142 -1.97 0.374 1049.00 0.4092 -1.09 0.143 519.66 0.4164 -2.61 0.649 1618.00 0.5107 -1.20 0.175 622.05 0.5177 -3.25 0.994 2209.72 0.6178 -1.24 0.192 675.08 0.6097 -3.67 1.260 2609.58 0.7083 -1.19 0.171 611.59 0.7077 -3.43 1.143 2496.83 0.8023 -1.01 0.134 492.24 0.8123 -2.80 0.740 1894.46 0.8987 -0.60 0.060 237.53 0.9156 -1.80 0.237 784.00 1.0000 0.00 0.000 0.00 1.0000 0.00 0.000 0.00
210
The variations of excess molar volume, EmV with mole fraction of propanoic acid at
all temperatures for the binary systems are shown in Figures 5.A.3 and 5.A.4. The deviation
of a physical and chemical property of the liquid mixture from the ideal behaviour is a
measure of the interaction between molecules of the components of liquid mixtures and such
type of deviation is generally attributed to dipole-dipole interactions and hydrogen bond
between unlike molecules [27] respectively. The factors that are mainly responsible for the
expansion of volume i.e. positive values of EVm are: (i) breaking one or both of the
components in a solution i.e. loss of dipolar association between the molecules (dispersion
forces). (ii) The geometry of molecular structures which does not favour the fitting of
molecules of one component into the voids created by the molecules of other component.
(iii) Steric hindrance of the molecules. The negative values of EVm are due to strong specific
interactions such as (iv) association of molecules through the formation of hydrogen bond
(or) association due to dipole-dipole interactions (or) association due to induced dipole -
dipole interactions (v) accommodation of molecules due to larger differences in molar
volumes.
The variation of excess molar volume in the present investigation is negative over the
entire mole fraction range. Both the components of the liquid mixtures studied are polar
molecules in nature. The observed negative EVm values are due to the interaction between
the proton of acid and lone pair of electrons on the nitrogen atom of aniline/resonant electron
density on benzene ring of substituted aniline. Due to the large difference in molar
volumes/masses of propanoic acid and substituted anilines accommodation of smaller
213
molecules of one component into the voids created by the other component of molecules is
also responsible for observed negative EVm values. The above factors are responsible for the
negative values of EVm [28].
From the figures 5.A.3 and 5.A.4 it has been observed that as the temperature of the
systems increases the negative excess molar volumes decrease indicating the decrease of
interaction between the unlike molecules. The negative excess molar volumes follows the
order N,N-diethyl aniline > N,N-dimethyl aniline hence the strength of interactions as
follows, N,N-diethyl aniline > N,N-dimethyl aniline. The variations of excess Gibbs free
energy with mole fraction of propanoic acid at all temperatures for the binary systems are
shown in Figures 5.A.5 and 5.A.6. The ΔG*E are found to be positive for both the systems
and at all temperatures. These positive values are indicating the existing of strong
interactions between the components of unlike molecules. As temperature increases these
positive values are found to decrease which shows the decrease of interaction between
constituent molecules.
The values of deviation in viscosity and excess molar volume have been fitted to
Redlich-Kister type polynomial [29] equation. The R-K coefficients and the standard
deviations of both binary mixtures have been presented in Table 5.A.5. The smaller standard
deviation values show that the polynomial better fits the calculated properties.
The partial molar volumes ,1mV of component 1(PA) and ,2mV of component 2
(DMA/DEA) in the mixtures over the entire composition range are calculated. These values
are furnished in Table 5.A.6. From this table, the values of ,1mV and ,2mV for both the
components in the mixtures are lesser than their respective molar volumes in the pure state
216
Table 5.A.5 Coefficients Ai of Redlich-Kister type polynomial equation (3.28) and the corresponding standard deviations, σ (3.29) of all the systems under investigation property A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 σ N,N-dimethyl aniline+propanoic acid
T = 303.15 K
Δη /10-3N·s·m-2 1.715 -1.650 1.467 0.987 -1.474 0.009
EVm /10-6m3·mol-1 0.01 -6.91 16.25 -21.59 12.24 0.02
T = 313.15 K
Δη /10-3N·s·m-2 0.928 -0.584 -0.036 0.352 -0.149 0.002
EVm /10-6m3·mol-1 0.01 -4.82 6.89 -7.52 5.45 0.02
T = 323.15 K
Δη /10-3N·s·m-2 0.689 -0.524 -0.061 0.485 -0.376 0.003
EVm /10-6m3·mol-1 0.01 -3.41 1.53 -0.21 2.08 0.02
N,N-diethyl aniline+propanoic acid
T = 303.15 K
Δη /10-3N·s·m-2 8.601 -14.681 5.040 15.866 -15.955 0.074
EVm /10-6m3·mol-1 -0.09 -1.75 -31.27 45.85 -12.65 0.19
T = 313.15 K
Δη /10-3N·s·m-2 5.460 -9.244 0.247 10.985 -6.042 0.041
EVm /10-6m3·mol-1 -0.09 -0.056 -35.45 53.48 -17.29 0.19
T = 323.15 K
Δη /10-3N·s·m-2 3.830 -6.168 -1.079 7.310 -2.734 0.037
EVm /10-6m3·mol-1 -0.03 -4.97 -6.10 3.33 7.74 0.12
217
Table 5.A.6 Calculated values of partial molar volumes ( m,1V and m,2V ) with mole fraction of propanoic acid, x for all binary system at 303.15, 313.15 and 323.15 K N,N-dimethyl aniline+propanoic acid N,N-diethyl aniline+propanoic acid x m,1V / m,2V / x m,1V / m,2V / 10-6m3.mol-1 10-6m3.mol-1 10-6m3.mol-1 10-6m3.mol-
T =303.15 K
0.0000 74.71 127.84 0.0000 74.38 161.17 0.1020 75.02 127.82 0.1047 74.82 161.15 0.2054 75.14 127.80 0.2096 74.74 161.18 0.3071 75.19 127.77 0.3142 74.60 161.23 0.4092 75.24 127.75 0.4164 74.60 161.24 0.5107 75.27 127.72 0.5177 74.75 161.10 0.6178 75.30 127.68 0.6097 74.97 160.81 0.7083 75.33 127.64 0.7077 75.20 160.32 0.8023 75.36 127.57 0.8123 75.38 159.72 0.8987 75.40 127.39 0.9156 75.43 159.25 1.0000 75.43 126.89 1.0000 75.43 159.21
T =313.15 K 0.0000 75.72 129.13 0.0000 75.06 162.62 0.1020 75.72 129.13 0.1047 75.57 162.60 0.2054 75.79 129.12 0.2096 75.46 162.63 0.3071 75.86 129.09 0.3142 75.30 162.70 0.4092 75.91 129.06 0.4164 75.30 162.71 0.5107 75.94 129.03 0.5177 75.47 162.56 0.6178 75.98 128.99 0.6097 75.69 162.26 0.7083 76.02 128.93 0.7077 75.92 161.77 0.8023 76.06 128.83 0.8123 76.06 161.19 0.8987 76.09 128.69 0.9156 76.11 160.74 1.0000 76.10 128.51 1.0000 76.10 160.61
T =323.15 K 0.0000 76.87 130.21 0.0000 75.90 163.50 0.1020 76.72 130.22 0.1047 76.56 163.47 0.2054 76.75 130.21 0.2096 76.49 163.49 0.3071 76.81 130.18 0.3142 76.36 163.54 0.4092 76.86 130.15 0.4164 76.38 163.54 0.5107 76.90 130.12 0.5177 76.51 163.42 0.6178 76.93 130.08 0.6097 76.66 163.21 0.7083 76.97 130.01 0.7077 76.80 162.92 0.8023 77.01 129.91 0.8123 76.91 162.51 0.8987 77.05 129.78 0.9156 77.01 161.77 1.0000 77.06 129.70 1.0000 77.06 160.51
218
i.e contraction of volume takes place on mixing PA with DMA/DEA. Figures 5.A.7 and
5.A.8 represent the variation of excess partial molar volumes of PA and DMA/DEA in the
binary mixtures of PA+DMA and PA+DEA respectively. Examination of these figures
reveals that, indicating strong interactions exist between the unlike molecules. These figures
support the conclusions drawn from EmV values.
The dynamic viscosities of the binary liquid mixtures have been calculated using
various empirical relations like Grunberg and Nissan [30], Hind and Ubbelohde [31], Katti
and Chaudari [32], Heric and Brewer [33] and the corresponding interaction parameters are
also evaluated. Theoretical values of viscosity of the binary liquid mixtures of PA+DMA
and PA+DEA calculated using the above equations are given in Tables 5.A.7 and 5.A.8
respectively at all three temperatures. Table 5.A.9 presents the values of interaction
parameters along with the standard deviations, σ. The variation of these interaction
parameters with temperature or composition follows the order N,N-diethyl aniline > N,N-
dimethyl aniline at constant composition and temperature respectively. Further the
interaction parameter values are found to decrease with an increase of temperature for all the
systems studied. These results are in good agreement with the results derived from the
excess properties. Prolongo et al [34] reported positive values of interaction parameter
corresponding to systems with negative excess molar volumes. This is in good agreement
with our results. The estimated values of σ are smaller indicating that experimental values of
viscosities are well correlated by all the viscosity models.
221
Table 5.A.7 Theoretical values of viscosities from eqn.s [(3.47) - (3.53)] with mole fraction of propanoic acid, x for N,N-dimethyl aniline+propanoic acid at 303.15, 313.15 and 323.15 K
Grunberg Hind Katti Heric x & & & &
Nissan Ubbelohde Chaudari Brewer T = 303.15 K
0.0000 1.174 1.174 1.174 1.174 0.1020 1.333 1.329 1.333 1.334 0.2054 1.464 1.444 1.463 1.467 0.3071 1.552 1.517 1.550 1.555 0.4092 1.592 1.550 1.588 1.594 0.5107 1.578 1.543 1.575 1.579 0.6178 1.509 1.493 1.506 1.508 0.7083 1.411 1.415 1.411 1.409 0.8023 1.280 1.301 1.282 1.278 0.8987 1.124 1.149 1.127 1.122 1.0000 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
T = 313.15 K 0.0000 0.982 0.982 0.982 0.982 0.1020 1.053 1.052 1.053 1.055 0.2054 1.108 1.103 1.108 1.111 0.3071 1.143 1.135 1.142 1.145 0.4092 1.157 1.147 1.155 1.158 0.5107 1.148 1.141 1.147 1.148 0.6178 1.116 1.114 1.115 1.115 0.7083 1.071 1.075 1.072 1.070 0.8023 1.011 1.019 1.012 1.009 0.8987 0.936 0.944 0.937 0.935 1.0000 0.848 0.848 0.848 0.848
T = 323.15 K 0.0000 0.826 0.826 0.826 0.826 0.1020 0.873 0.871 0.873 0.874 0.2054 0.908 0.904 0.908 0.910 0.3071 0.929 0.923 0.929 0.931 0.4092 0.936 0.929 0.935 0.937 0.5107 0.927 0.922 0.926 0.927 0.6178 0.902 0.900 0.901 0.901 0.7083 0.869 0.871 0.869 0.867 0.8023 0.824 0.830 0.826 0.823 0.8987 0.770 0.776 0.771 0.769 1.0000 0.706 0.706 0.706 0.706
222
Table 5.A.8 Theoretical values of viscosities from eqn.s [(3.47)-(3.53)] with mole fraction of propanoic acid, x for N,N-diethyl aniline+propanoic acid at 303.15, 313.15 and 323.15 K
Grunberg Hind Katti Heric x & & & &
Nissan Ubbelohde Chaudari Brewer T = 303.15 K
0.0000 1.703 1.703 1.703 1.703 0.1047 2.359 2.365 2.351 2.368 0.2096 2.986 2.855 2.969 3.002 0.3142 3.450 3.170 3.428 3.467 0.4164 3.641 3.311 3.625 3.653 0.5177 3.528 3.287 3.530 3.531 0.6097 3.185 3.125 3.202 3.180 0.7077 2.646 2.806 2.665 2.635 0.8123 1.988 2.297 1.996 1.978 0.9156 1.372 1.624 1.376 1.367 1.0000 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
T = 313.15 K
0.0000 1.402 1.402 1.402 1.402 0.1047 1.801 1.791 1.796 1.808 0.2096 2.155 2.076 2.146 2.167 0.3142 2.402 2.256 2.390 2.414 0.4164 2.494 2.330 2.486 2.502 0.5177 2.422 2.306 2.426 2.424 0.6097 2.226 2.199 2.238 2.222 0.7077 1.916 1.996 1.929 1.908 0.8123 1.525 1.679 1.528 1.517 0.9156 1.135 1.263 1.137 1.131 1.0000 0.848 0.848 0.848 0.848
T = 323.15 K
0.0000 1.049 1.049 1.049 1.049 0.1047 1.310 1.313 1.307 1.315 0.2096 1.539 1.508 1.531 1.548 0.3142 1.699 1.632 1.688 1.708 0.4164 1.763 1.685 1.753 1.769 0.5177 1.726 1.672 1.721 1.728 0.6097 1.611 1.603 1.612 1.608 0.7077 1.419 1.469 1.423 1.414 0.8123 1.169 1.259 1.174 1.162 0.9156 0.908 0.983 0.914 0.904 1.0000 0.706 0.706 0.706 0.706
223
Table 5.A.9 various interaction parameters calculated from eqns. [(3.47)-(3.53)] and the corresponding standard deviations (σ/10-3 N.s.m-2)
T/K G12 σ H12 σ Wvis/RT σ Δ12 σ
N,N-dimethyl aniline+propanoic acid
303.15 1.617 0.150 0.002 0.125 1.693 0.149 1.739 0.153
313.15 0.926 0.049 0.001 0.043 1.009 0.048 1.047 0.050
323.15 0.781 0.040 0.001 0.037 0.868 0.039 0.902 0.041
N,N-diethyl aniline+propanoic acid
303.15 4.128 1.078 0.005 0.913 4.277 1.062 4.373 1.091
313.15 3.232 0.636 0.003 0.558 3.394 0.626 3.478 0.645
323.15 2.816 0.417 0.002 0.380 2.972 0.411 3.062 0.424
224
Conclusions
(i) Densities and viscosities of binary mixtures of propanoic acid with N,N-dimethyl
aniline and N,N-diethyl aniline are measured over the entire composition range at
T=(303.15, 313.15, and 323.15) K.
(ii) The deviations in viscosity, excess molar volumes are computed from the
experimental results. These deviation/excess properties have been fitted to Redlich-
Kister type polynomial.
(iii) These results indicate the presence of strong specific interactions such as interactions
between proton of propanoic acid and lone pair of electrons on the nitrogen atom of
aniline and due to the observed difference in molar volumes of propanoic acid and
substituted aniline is responsible for the observed negative EVm and positive Δη
values in the present investigated systems.
(iv) The strength of interactions follows the order N,N-diethyl aniline + propanoic acid >
N,N-dimethyl aniline + propanoic acid. The strength of interactions is also studied
with the variation of temperature.
(v) The experimental viscosity values are compared with the viscosity values obtained
from different empirical relations and these are in good agreement with the
experimental values.
225
Section B
Propionic acid with equimolar mixture of
(N,N-dimethyl formamide and methanol/ethanol/1-propanol)
5.B.1 Importance and properties of the chemicals
Alkanols are of interesting simple examples of biological and industrial important
amphiphilic materials [35]. Alkanol are polar molecules and self associated through
hydrogen bonding of their hydroxyl groups [2]. Methanol also known as methyl alcohol or
wood alcohol with chemical formula CH3OH. The melting and boiling points are -970C and
64.70C respectively. It is the simplest alcohol, and is a light, volatile, colourless, flammable
liquid with a distinctive odor very similar to, but slightly sweeter than, that of ethanol
(drinking alcohol). At room temperature, it is a polar liquid, and is used as an antifreeze,
solvent, fuel, and as a denaturant for ethanol. Methanol is used on a limited basis to fuel
internal combustion engines.
Ethanol, also called ethyl alcohol, pure alcohol, grain alcohol, or drinking alcohol
with the structural formula CH3CH2OH. It is a volatile, color less liquid that has a slight
odor. The melting and boiling points are -1140C and 78.370C respectively. Ethanol is
miscible with water and is a good general purpose solvent. The largest single use of ethanol
is as a motor fuel and fuel additive Ethanol is the principal psychoactive constituent in
alcoholic beverages. It is found in paints, tinctures, markers, and personal care products such
as perfumes and deodorants.
1-Propanol or propan-1-ol or 1-propyl alcohol or n-propyl alcohol or n-propanol or
simply propanol is a primary alcohol with the formula CH3CH2CH2OH. It is a colourless
liquid having melting and boiling points are -1260C and 97 to 980C respectively. It is formed
226
naturally in small amounts during many fermentation processes and used as a solvent in the
pharmaceutical industry mainly for resins and cellulose esters. The dipole moments of
methanol, ethanol and 1-propanol are 1.70 D, 1.69 D and 1.58 D respectively. N,N-dimethyl
formamide has large dipole moment 3.82 D [36] and in view of this dipole-dipole
interactions are expected to play significant role to study the molecular interactions present
in the liquid mixtures. The properties of propanoic acid and N,N-dimethyl formamide are
discussed in earlier.
In the present investigation, we reported densities (ρ) and viscosities (η) of the liquid
mixtures of propanoic acid with equimolar mixture of N,N-dimethyl formamide and
methanol/ethanol/1-propanol at three different temperatures T = 303.15, 313.15 and 323.15
K over the entire mole fraction range of propanoic acid. The excess and deviation properties
such as excess molar volume ( EVm ), deviation in viscosity (Δη) and excess Gibb’s free
energy of activation of viscous flow (ΔG*E) have been calculated using experimental data of
ρ and η. The variation of EVm , Δη and ΔG*E with composition and temperature have been
discussed in terms of molecular interactions existing among the molecules of these mixtures.
5.B.2 Experimental
Propanoic acid (PA), N,N-dimethyl formamide (DMF), methanol (MOH), ethanol
(EOH) and 1-propanol (POH) used in the present study were the AR grade products from
LOBA Chemicals, India and were purified by standard methods described in the literature
[21,22] The mass fraction purity of liquids obtained is > 0.995. Before use, the chemicals
were stored over 0.4 nm molecular sieves approximately for 72 h to remove water content
and degassed.
227
Mixtures are prepared by mass in air tight bottles. The mass measurements are
performed with a METTLER TOLEDO (Switzerland make) ABB5-S/FACT digital balance
with an accuracy ± 0.01 mg. Densities and viscosities of pure liquids and liquid mixtures
have been determined using 5 cm3 two stem double walled Parker & Parker type pyknometer
[23] and Ostwald viscometer which is calibrated as described by Subrahmanyam Naidu and
Ravindra Prasad [24] using triply distilled water respectively. The reproducibility in the
measured parameters density and viscosity are 3 in 105 parts and ± 0.2% respectively. The
densities and viscosities of pure liquids in this investigation at three different temperatures
303.15, 313.15, and 323.15 are compiled in Table 5.B.1 together with the literature data
[8,18,22,37-45] available. These results are found to be in good agreement with literature
data.
5.B.3 Results and discussion
The experimental values of ρ and η are reported in Tables 5.B.2, 5.B.3 and 5.B.4
respectively for (DMF+MOH)+PA, (DMF+EOH)+PA and (DMF+POH)+PA mixtures at
different temperatures over the entire mole fraction, x of PA. It has been observed that the
density varies monotonically with the concentration of propanoic acid at all temperatures but
the viscosity changes non-linearly showing maxima at about x ≈ 0.6 in the PA rich region as
all investigated temperatures in all the systems. The observed maxima (peak) have found to
increase with increasing chain length of alcohols. Such deviations may be attributed to
specific interactions arising from the formation of complexes among the mixing molecules.
This type of behaviour could be attributed to complex formation.
The variation of EmV for all the systems at different temperatures is shown in Figures
5.B.1, 5.B.2 and 5.B.3. The variation of excess molar volume in the present investigation is
228
Table 5.B.1 Comparison of experimental values of density (ρ) and viscosity (η) of pure liquids with literature values Liquid ρ/kg.m-3 η/10-3N.s.m-2
present work literature present work literature T = 303.15 K Methanol 781.6 781.70[8] 0.513 0.5143[8] 781.96[22] 0.515 [22] Ethanol 779.9 780.66 [8] 0.980 0.987 [8] 780.68 [22] 1-Propanol 795.1 795.65 [8] 1.716 1.725[22] 795.48 [22] 1.705[22] N,N-dimethyl
formamide 939.9 939.8 [37] 0.768 0.756[37] 939.7 [18] 0.752 [38] Propanoic acid 982.1 982.0 [39] 0.950 0.9498 [39] T = 313.15 K Methanol 772.9 772.36 [8] 0.446 0.448 [8] 772.21[22] 0.452 [22] Ethanol 771.1 772.12[8] 0.812 0.823 [8] 772.13 [22] 0.814 [22] 1-Propanol 787.1 788.69 [8] 1.315 1.314 [8] 787.37 [22] 1.336 [22] N,N-dimethyl
formamide 932.1 930.2 [37] 0.678 0.673 [37] 929.8 [40] 0.664 [38] Propanoic acid 973.4 971.0[39] 0.848 0.8453[39] T = 323.15 K Methanol 764.8 762.7 [41] 0.405 0.395 [41] Ethanol 766.4 766.1 [41] 0.741 0.7493 [41] 1-Propanol 778.7 779.5 [42] 0.999 1.1004 [42] 1.1208 [43] N,N-dimethyl
formamide 921.6 920.1 [41] 0.593 0.614 [41] 921.14 [44] 0.6128 [45] Propanoic acid 961.4 959.5 [39] 0.706 0.8102 [39]
229
Table 5.B.2 Experimental values of densities (ρ) and viscosities (η) with mole fraction of PA, x for
(DMF+MOH)+PA binary system at 303.15, 313.15 and 323.15 K x T = 303.15 K T = 313.15 K T = 323.15 K
ρ/kg·m-3 η/10-3N·s·m-2 ρ/kg·m-3 η/10-3N·s·m-2 ρ/kg·m-3 η/10-3N·s·m-2
0.0000 892.2 0.674 882.8 0.580 878.3 0.503
0.1142 906.3 0.758 895.9 0.653 887.0 0.550
0.2189 919.3 0.868 908.2 0.729 898.4 0.610
0.324 931.5 1.001 920.4 0.837 911.4 0.696
0.4218 942.2 1.130 931.0 0.940 922.0 0.778
0.5248 952.7 1.267 942.1 1.041 932.4 0.875
0.6225 961.5 1.341 951.6 1.120 940.9 0.919
0.7209 969.4 1.341 960.0 1.115 948.6 0.925
0.8156 976.1 1.273 966.8 1.060 955.0 0.869
0.9074 980.1 1.098 971.1 0.950 958.9 0.767
1.0000 982.1 0.950 973.4 0.848 961.4 0.706
230
Table 5.B.3 Experimental values of densities (ρ) and viscosities (η) with mole fraction of PA, x for (DMF+EOH)+PA binary system at 303.15, 313.15 and 323.15 K x T = 303.15 K T = 303.15 K T = 303.15 K
ρ/kg·m-3 η/10-3N·s·m-2 ρ/kg·m-3 η/10-3N·s·m-2 ρ/kg·m-3 η/10-3N·s·m-2
0.0000 871.20 0.758 866.59 0.649 857.24 0.563
0.1110 887.16 0.856 880.21 0.720 870.10 0.619
0.2185 901.60 0.978 894.76 0.836 883.96 0.707
0.3265 915.62 1.118 908.53 0.940 897.19 0.789
0.4235 928.00 1.244 920.25 1.031 908.59 0.858
0.5197 939.77 1.352 931.51 1.119 919.66 0.931
0.6276 952.56 1.391 943.97 1.169 931.45 0.973
0.7309 964.47 1.387 955.56 1.151 942.23 0.963
0.8216 972.70 1.316 963.20 1.080 950.26 0.902
0.9121 978.37 1.132 969.46 0.964 957.02 0.789
1.0000 982.09 0.950 973.40 0.848 961.39 0.706
231
Table 5.B.4 Experimental values of densities (ρ) and viscosities (η) with mole fraction of PA, x for (DMF+POH)+PA binary system at 303.15, 313.15 and 323.15 K x T = 303.15 K T = 313.15 K T = 313.15 K
ρ/kg·m-3 η/10-3N·s·m-2 ρ/kg·m-3 η/10-3N·s·m-2 ρ/kg·m-3 η/10-3N·s·m-2
0.0000 869.77 0.893 860.55 0.764 850.95 0.655
0.1109 884.95 1.002 875.08 0.865 864.89 0.738
0.2178 899.49 1.099 889.57 0.958 878.78 0.803
0.3264 913.75 1.226 904.16 1.047 893.17 0.884
0.4283 926.75 1.339 916.96 1.136 905.76 0.953
0.5306 939.44 1.447 929.68 1.203 918.23 1.020
0.6279 950.77 1.472 940.96 1.232 929.19 1.032
0.7279 961.55 1.452 951.98 1.195 939.90 1.005
0.8185 970.66 1.375 960.80 1.120 948.62 0.946
0.9097 977.83 1.187 967.82 1.005 955.19 0.840
1.0000 982.09 0.950 973.40 0.848 961.39 0.706
235
negative over the entire mole fraction range [30]. The variation of Δη for all the
systems at different temperatures is shown in Figures 5.B.4, 5.B.5 and 5.B.6. The
variation of ΔG*E for all the systems at different temperatures is shown in Figures
5.B.7, 5.B.8 and 5.B.9. The observed negative EVm and positive Δη and ΔG*E values
reveal that strong interactions exist in the unlike molecules of the mixtures.
The factors that are mainly responsible for the expansion of molar volume i.e.
positive values of EVm are: (i) Breaking one or both of the components in a solution
i.e. loss of dipolar association between the molecules (dispersion forces). (ii) The
geometry of molecular structures which does not favour the fitting of molecules of
one component into the voids created by the molecules of other component. (iii)
Steric hindrance of the molecules. The negative values of EVm are due to strong
specific interactions such as (iv) association of molecules through the formation of
hydrogen bond (or) association due to dipole-dipole interactions (v) accommodation
of molecules due to considerable differences in molar volumes. The presence of
strong interaction is due to the hydrogen bonding (O…..H-O-) between carbonyl
group (-C=O) of amide molecules and hydroxyl group (-OH) of alcohol groups.
When third component PA is added to the equimolar mixture the existing hydrogen
bond between amide and alcohol groups is broken and a new hydrogen bond is
formed between unlike molecules of acid and alcohol groups. Moreover all the
components of the liquid mixtures studied are polar in nature having dipole moments
of methanol μ = 1.70 D, ethanol μ = 1.69 D, 1-propanol μ = 1.58 D, N,N-dimethyl
formamide μ = 3.82 and propanoic acid μ = 1.75. Therefore, dipole-dipole
236
interactions are also present in the liquid mixtures investigated. In addition to these,
physical interaction such as geometrical fitting of
242
smaller molecules into the voids created by the larger molecules is also favourable
for the present systems studied.
From figures 5.B.1 – 5.B.3 it is observed that, as the temperature of the
systems increases the negative excess molar volumes are found to decrease
indicating the decrease of interaction between the unlike molecules but the
interaction increases from MOH to POH. As the alkanol chain length increases,
decreasing the concentration of –OH groups in higher alkanols and thereby lowers
dipole moment in higher alkanols which causes weaker interactions. These are the
expected results, which we have observed that the strength of interaction increases as
we move from MOH to POH. This is due to the predomination of physical
interaction over chemical interaction between the unlike molecules, in other words,
geometrical fitting of smaller molecules into the voids created by the larger
molecules between the components of molecules of the liquid mixtures. Such similar
studies were reported by Harsha Kumar et al [46]. The strength of interactions in the
mixtures follows the order (DMF+MOH)+PA<
(DMF+EOH)+PA<(DMF+POH)+PA. The above discussion is also supported by the
observed positive values of Δη and ΔG*E.
Generally, negative values of Δη indicate the presence of dispersion forces or
mutual loss of specific interactions in like molecules operating in the systems arising
due to weak intermolecular interactions and positive values of deviation in viscosity
indicate the presence of strong interactions [25,26]. The sign and magnitude of Δη
depend on the combined effect of factors such as molecular size, shape, and
intermolecular forces. From the above observations it has been clear that as the
temperature increases the interaction between unlike molecules decreases.
243
The deviation/excess properties have been fitted to Redlich-Kister type
polynomial [29] equation (3.28). The coefficients Ai (A0 to A4) are determined using
the least square method. The corresponding standard deviations ( )EY are
calculated using the relation 3.29. The coefficients, Ai and the standard deviations, σ
of all the liquid mixtures have been presented in Table 5.B.5.
The partial molar volumes ,1mV of component 1 (propanoic acid) and ,2mV of
component 2 (N,N-dimethyl formamide + methanol/ethanol/1-propanol) in the
mixtures over the entire composition range are calculated by using the relations 3.30
to 3.33 which are described in chapter 3. The excess partial molar volumes ,1EmV and
,2EmV are calculated using the relations 3.34 and 3.35. The values of ,1mV and ,2mV are
furnished in Table 5.B.6. From the above table, the values of ,1mV and ,2mV for both
the components in the mixtures are lesser than their respective molar volumes in the
pure state. The variation of excess partial molar volumes, ,1EmV (PA), ,2
EmV (Equimolar
mixture DMF+MOH/EOH/POH) with mole fraction of PA for (DMF+MOH)+PA,
(DMF+EOH)+PA and (DMF+POH)+PA mixtures are shown in Figures 5.B.10,
5.B.11 and 5.B.12 respectively. From these figures, it reveals that, the excess partial
molar volumes are almost negative over the entire composition range is studied. This
suggest that there is a contraction of volume occurs in the binary mixtures, indicating
the presence of strong interactions between the unlike molecules of the mixtures as
observed in EVm . The partial molar volumes, ,1mV
, ,2mV
and excess partial molar
volumes,,,1
EmV
, ,,2
EmV
of the components at infinite dilution are obtained using the
equations 3.36 and 3.37.
244
Table 5.B.5 Coefficients Ai of Redlich-Kister type polynomial equation (3.28) and the corresponding standard deviations, σ (3.29) of all the systems under investigation property A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 σ (DMF+MOH)+PA
T = 303.15 K
V E
m/ 10-5m3.mol-1 -0.212 0.152 -0.112 0.085 0.067 0.001
Δη/10-3N.s.m-2 1.684 -1.834 0.075 1.194 -0.998 0.007
ΔG*E/kJ.mol-1 4347.49 -3147.14 125.71 1380.25 -1897.60 15.47
T = 313.15 K
V E
m/ 10-5m3.mol-1 -0.167 0.221 -0.142 0.024 0.116 0.001
Δη/10-3N.s.m-2 1.237 -1.415 -0.137 1.095 -0.436 0.005
ΔG*E/kJ.mol-1 3946.00 -2985.68 -630.10 1995.54 -626.08 12.42
T = 323.15 K
V E
m/ 10-5m3.mol-1 -0.145 0.237 0.065 0.208 0.128 0.002
Δη/10-3N.s.m-2 0.981 -1.225 -0.153 1.118 0.670 0.004
ΔG*E/kJ.mol-1 3830.37 -3353.06 -668.67 2795.34 -1949.20 15.35
(DMF+EOH)+PA
T = 303.15 K
V E
m/ 10-5m3.mol-1 -0.234 0.205 -0.271 0.029 0.202 0.001
Δη/10-3N.s.m-2 1.880 -1.507 -0.044 0.479 -0.436 0.011
ΔG*E/kJ.mol-1 4413.56 -2421.62 141.39 -78.65 -611.31 20.74
T = 313.15 K
V E
m/ 10-5m3.mol-1 -0.202 0.169 -0.276 0.134 0.344 0.001
Δη/10-3N.s.m-2 1.410 -1.104 -0.003 0.560 -0.778 0.004
ΔG*E/kJ.mol-1 4042.90 -2085.25 346.74 442.86 -2174.14 12.54
245
T = 323.15 K
V E
m/ 10-5m3.mol-1 -0.171 0.137 -0.134 0.155 0.148 0.001
Δη/10-3N.s.m-2 1.120 -1.001 0.257 0.708 -1.120 0.003
ΔG*E/kJ.mol-1 3937.77 -2516.18 1127.00 1348.04 -3656.51 11.30
(DMF+POH)+PA
T = 303.15 K
V E
m / 10-5m3.mol-1 -0.332 0.132 -0.073 0.085 -0.086 0.001
Δη/10-3N.s.m-2 1.967 -1.605 -0.102 0.550 0.284 0.009
ΔG*E/kJ.mol-1 4206.97 -2745.07 89.29 130.35 1209.09 15.72
T = 313.15 K
V E
m / 10-5m3.mol-1 -0.312 0.133 -0.101 0.055 0.112 0.001
Δη/10-3N.s.m-2 1.526 -1.003 -0.291 0.569 0.305 0.007
ΔG*E/kJ.mol-1 3941.34 -2013.12 -274.16 735.52 1043.917 7.96
T = 323.15 K
V E
m/ 10-5m3.mol-1 -0.298 0.145 -0.077 0.014 0.149 0.002
Δη/10-3N.s.m-2 1.282 -0.903 -0.341 0.523 0.437 0.004
ΔG*E/kJ.mol-1 4048.70 -2300.52 -594.56 868.89 1682.83 9.59
246
Table 5.B.6 Partial molar volumes as function of mole fraction of PA, x of all the liquid mixtures at 303.15, 313.15 and 323.15 K (DMF+MOH)+PA (DMF+EOH)+PA (DMF+POH)+PA x ,1V m ,2V m x ,1V m ,2V m x ,1V m ,2V m 10-5 m3.mol-1 10-5 m3.mol-1 10-5 m3.mol-1 T = 303.15 K 0.0000 7.523 5.892 0.0000 7.473 6.834 0.0000 7.269 7.657 0.1142 7.420 5.897 0.1110 7.386 6.837 0.1109 7.332 7.654 0.2189 7.416 5.896 0.2185 7.415 6.827 0.2178 7.357 7.648 0.3240 7.432 5.887 0.3265 7.438 6.813 0.3264 7.382 7.637 0.4218 7.444 5.878 0.4235 7.438 6.808 0.4283 7.408 7.620 0.5248 7.455 5.868 0.5197 7.433 6.811 0.5306 7.435 7.594 0.6225 7.468 5.853 0.6276 7.443 6.805 0.6279 7.458 7.565 0.7209 7.488 5.821 0.7309 7.474 6.765 0.7279 7.482 7.522 0.8156 7.513 5.758 0.8216 7.509 6.690 0.8185 7.505 7.455 0.9074 7.534 5.656 0.9121 7.536 6.599 0.9097 7.529 7.314 1.0000 7.543 5.511 1.0000 7.543 6.569 1.0000 7.543 7.024 T = 313.15 K 0.0000 7.664 5.955 0.0000 7.780 6.875 0.0000 7.498 7.739 0.1142 7.542 5.961 0.1110 7.461 6.888 0.1109 7.400 7.743 0.2189 7.522 5.962 0.2185 7.465 6.882 0.2178 7.418 7.737 0.3240 7.518 5.961 0.3265 7.510 6.860 0.3264 7.456 7.721 0.4218 7.514 5.960 0.4235 7.522 6.848 0.4283 7.484 7.702 0.5248 7.514 5.959 0.5197 7.516 6.851 0.5306 7.506 7.681 0.6225 7.527 5.946 0.6276 7.519 6.855 0.6279 7.529 7.652 0.7209 7.552 5.906 0.7309 7.547 6.824 0.7279 7.558 7.600 0.8156 7.581 5.833 0.8216 7.581 6.753 0.8185 7.585 7.526 0.9074 7.603 5.738 0.9121 7.605 6.678 0.9097 7.604 7.431 1.0000 7.610 5.659 1.0000 7.610 6.714 1.0000 7.610 7.350
247
T = 323.15 K 0.0000 8.198 5.986 0.0000 7.841 6.950 0.0000 7.639 7.827 0.1142 7.707 6.012 0.1110 7.605 6.976 0.1109 7.512 7.832 0.2189 7.582 6.034 0.2185 7.584 6.981 0.2178 7.521 7.828 0.3240 7.573 6.038 0.3265 7.609 6.958 0.3264 7.554 7.814 0.4218 7.593 6.027 0.4235 7.624 6.939 0.4283 7.579 7.797 0.5248 7.615 6.007 0.5197 7.629 6.933 0.5306 7.602 7.776 0.6225 7.635 5.979 0.6276 7.636 6.921 0.6279 7.628 7.742 0.7209 7.657 5.927 0.7309 7.654 6.872 0.7279 7.660 7.682 0.8156 7.680 5.838 0.8216 7.677 6.797 0.8185 7.687 7.603 0.9074 7.698 5.703 0.9121 7.698 6.766 0.9097 7.703 7.526 1.0000 7.706 5.523 1.0000 7.706 6.967 1.0000 7.706 7.519
251
The pertinent values of ,1mV
,2mV ,
,1EmV
and ,,2
EmV
are shown in Table 5.B.7. From the
above table these values are negative concluded that strong interactions exist in the
unlike molecules of the components. The magnitude of excess partial molar volumes
at infinite dilution also follow the order (DMF+POH)+PA > (DMF+EOH)+PA >
(DMF+MOH)+PA which supports the trends of EVm values very well those observed
in these mixtures.
The dynamic viscosities of the investigated liquid mixtures have been
calculated using the Grunberg and Nissan [30], Hind and Ubbelohde [31], Katti and
Chaudari [32], Heric and Brewer [33] relations. The theoretical values of viscosity of
the (DMF+MOH)+PA, (DMF+EOH)+PA and (DMF+POH)+PA liquid mixtures
calculated using the above theories are compiled in Tables 5.B.8, 5.B.9 and 5.B.10
respectively. Table 5.B.11 presents the values of the interaction parameters along
with the standard deviations, σ. The terms G12, H12, Wvis and Δ12 are adjustable
parameters representing the binary interactions. The variation of these parameters
with composition follows the order (DMF+POH)+PA > (DMF+EOH)+PA >
(DMF+MOH)+PA at constant temperature. Further the interaction parameter values
are found to decrease with an increase in temperature of all the systems studied.
These results are in good agreement with the results derived from the excess
properties. Prolongo et al [34] reported positive values of interaction parameter
corresponding to systems with negative excess molar volumes. This is in good
agreement with our results. The estimated values of σ are smaller indicating that
experimental values of viscosities are well correlated by all the four viscosity
models.
252
Table 5.B.7 The values of ,1mV
, 1V ,,,1
EmV
, ,2mV
, 2V ,,,2
EmV
for all liquid mixtures at T = (303.15, 313.15 and 323.15) K ,1mV
1V
,,1
EmV
,2mV
2V ,,2
EmV
10-5m3.mol-1 (DMF+MOH)+PA
T = 303.15 K
7.523 7.543 -0.020 5.399 5.892 -0.494
T = 313.15 K
7.664 7.610 0.053 5.517 5.955 -0.438
T = 323.15 K
8.198 7.706 0.493 5.588 5.986 -0.398
(DMF+EOH)+PA
T = 303.15 K
7.473 7.543 -0.070 6.298 6.834 -0.537
T = 313.15 K
7.780 7.610 0.169 6.438 6.875 -0.437
T = 323.15 K
7.841 7.706 0.136 6.501 6.950 -0.449
(DMF+POH)+PA
T = 303.15 K
7.269 7.543 -0.274 6.950 7.657 -0.707
T = 313.15 K
7.498 7.610 -0.113 7.250 7.739 -0.489
T = 323.15 K
7.639 7.706 -0.067 7.442 7.827 -0.385
253
Table 5.B.8 Theoretical values of viscosities from eqn.s [(3.47)-(3.53)] with mole fraction of PA, x for (DMF+MOH)+PA at 303.15, 313.15 and 323.15 K
Grunberg Hind Katti Heric x & & & &
Nissan Ubbelohde Chaudari Brewer T = 303.15 K
0.0000 0.674 0.674 0.674 0.674 0.1142 0.831 0.869 0.829 0.831 0.2189 0.969 1.011 0.966 0.968 0.3240 1.089 1.117 1.086 1.088 0.4218 1.174 1.185 1.172 1.174 0.5248 1.227 1.222 1.227 1.227 0.6225 1.239 1.225 1.240 1.239 0.7209 1.210 1.198 1.213 1.211 0.8156 1.148 1.142 1.151 1.149 0.9074 1.060 1.060 1.062 1.060 1.0000 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
T = 313.15 K
0.0000 0.580 0.580 0.580 0.580 0.1142 0.701 0.729 0.699 0.700 0.2189 0.806 0.839 0.804 0.806 0.3240 0.900 0.923 0.897 0.899 0.4218 0.968 0.979 0.966 0.968 0.5248 1.015 1.013 1.014 1.015 0.6225 1.031 1.022 1.033 1.032 0.7209 1.020 1.009 1.022 1.020 0.8156 0.982 0.975 0.985 0.983 0.9074 0.924 0.921 0.926 0.924 1.0000 0.848 0.848 0.848 0.848
T = 323.15 K
0.0000 0.503 0.503 0.503 0.503 0.1142 0.595 0.615 0.592 0.595 0.2189 0.674 0.697 0.671 0.674 0.3240 0.743 0.760 0.741 0.743 0.4218 0.793 0.801 0.792 0.793 0.5248 0.827 0.827 0.828 0.827 0.6225 0.839 0.834 0.841 0.839 0.7209 0.831 0.825 0.834 0.831 0.8156 0.804 0.800 0.807 0.804 0.9074 0.762 0.761 0.764 0.762 1.0000 0.706 0.706 0.706 0.706
254
Table 5.B.9 Theoretical values of viscosities from eqn.s [(3.47)-(3.53)] with mole fraction of PA, x for (DMF+EOH)+PA at 303.15, 313.15 and 323.15 K
Grunberg Hind Katti Heric x & & & &
Nissan Ubbelohde Chaudari Brewer T = 303.15 K
0.0000 0.758 0.758 0.758 0.758 0.1110 0.929 0.962 0.927 0.929 0.2185 1.084 1.116 1.081 1.084 0.3265 1.214 1.228 1.211 1.214 0.4235 1.297 1.291 1.293 1.296 0.5197 1.338 1.320 1.336 1.338 0.6276 1.332 1.311 1.332 1.332 0.7309 1.275 1.262 1.279 1.276 0.8216 1.189 1.187 1.193 1.189 0.9121 1.076 1.081 1.079 1.076 1.0000 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
T = 313.15 K
0.0000 0.649 0.649 0.649 0.649 0.1110 0.778 0.804 0.776 0.778 0.2185 0.895 0.922 0.892 0.894 0.3265 0.993 1.009 0.991 0.993 0.4235 1.058 1.061 1.056 1.058 0.5197 1.095 1.088 1.093 1.095 0.6276 1.099 1.088 1.100 1.099 0.7309 1.068 1.058 1.070 1.068 0.8216 1.013 1.009 1.015 1.013 0.9121 0.937 0.938 0.939 0.937 1.0000 0.848 0.848 0.848 0.848
T = 323.15 K
0.0000 0.563 0.563 0.563 0.563 0.1110 0.666 0.684 0.664 0.666 0.2185 0.757 0.777 0.755 0.757 0.3265 0.833 0.845 0.832 0.833 0.4235 0.882 0.885 0.881 0.882 0.5197 0.909 0.905 0.908 0.909 0.6276 0.910 0.903 0.911 0.911 0.7309 0.883 0.878 0.885 0.884 0.8216 0.839 0.838 0.841 0.839 0.9121 0.778 0.780 0.779 0.778 1.0000 0.706 0.706 0.706 0.706
255
Table 5.B.10 Theoretical values of viscosities from eqn.s [(3.47)-(3.53)] with mole fraction of PA, x for (DMF+POH)+PA at 303.15, 313.15 and 323.15 K
Grunberg Hind Katti Heric x & & & &
Nissan Ubbelohde Chaudari Brewer T = 303.15 K
0.0000 0.893 0.893 0.893 0.893 0.1109 1.077 1.100 1.076 1.077 0.2178 1.237 1.252 1.234 1.237 0.3264 1.363 1.359 1.360 1.363 0.4283 1.436 1.416 1.433 1.436 0.5306 1.456 1.431 1.455 1.456 0.6279 1.424 1.405 1.424 1.424 0.7279 1.343 1.338 1.344 1.343 0.8185 1.233 1.242 1.236 1.233 0.9097 1.098 1.112 1.100 1.098 1.0000 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
T = 313.15 K
0.0000 0.764 0.764 0.764 0.764 0.1109 0.906 0.922 0.905 0.906 0.2178 1.028 1.039 1.026 1.028 0.3264 1.126 1.123 1.124 1.126 0.4283 1.184 1.169 1.183 1.184 0.5306 1.205 1.184 1.205 1.205 0.6279 1.187 1.169 1.188 1.187 0.7279 1.133 1.124 1.135 1.133 0.8185 1.056 1.057 1.058 1.056 0.9097 0.958 0.964 0.960 0.958 1.0000 0.848 0.848 0.848 0.848
T = 323.15 K
0.0000 0.655 0.655 0.655 0.655 0.1109 0.773 0.787 0.772 0.773 0.2178 0.874 0.884 0.872 0.874 0.3264 0.954 0.953 0.953 0.954 0.4283 1.000 0.990 0.999 1.000 0.5306 1.015 1.001 1.015 1.015 0.6279 0.997 0.986 0.998 0.997 0.7279 0.949 0.946 0.951 0.949 0.8185 0.883 0.887 0.885 0.883 0.9097 0.800 0.807 0.800 0.800 1.0000 0.706 0.706 0.706 0.706
256
Table 5.B.11 Various interaction parameters calculated from eqns. [(3.47)-(3.53)] and the corresponding standard deviations (σ/10-3 N.s.m-2)
T/K G12 σ H12 σ Wvis/RT σ Δ12 σ
(DMF+MOH)+PA
303.15 1.682 0.109 0.002 0.131 1.677 0.107 1.740 0.108
313.15 1.446 0.079 0.001 0.097 1.448 0.076 1.504 0.078
323.15 1.277 0.071 0.001 0.082 1.292 0.069 1.335 0.071
(DMF+EOH)+PA
303.15 1.808 0.103 0.002 0.120 1.772 0.100 1.831 0.103
313.15 1.538 0.068 0.001 0.084 1.510 0.066 1.562 0.068
323.15 1.449 0.061 0.001 0.071 1.428 0.059 1.473 0.061
(DMF+POH)+PA
303.15 1.833 0.126 0.002 0.128 1.784 0.123 1.838 0.126
313.15 1.607 0.068 0.002 0.073 1.564 0.066 1.613 0.068
323.15 1.596 0.063 0.001 0.066 1.556 0.061 1.601 0.062
257
Conclusions
(i) The densities and viscosities of liquid mixtures of propanoic acid with equimolar
mixture of N,N-dimethyl formamide and methanol/ethanol/1-propanol have been
measured over the entire composition range at T = 303.15, 313.15 and 323.15 K
and the properties like, EmV , , EG , ,1mV , ,2mV , ,1
EmV , and ,2
EmV have been
computed from the experimental results.
(ii) The values of EVm are negative and Δη, ΔG*E are positive at all temperatures studied,
indicating the presence of strong interactions (hydrogen bonding O…..H-O-) such
as interactions between carbonyl group(-C=O) of amide molecules and hydroxyl
group(-OH) of alcohol groups and also the intermolecular interactions between
carbonyl group(-C=O) of acid molecules and hydroxyl group(-OH) of alcohols,
dipole-dipole interactions and geometrical fitting of smaller molecules into the
voids created by the larger molecules in the investigated systems.
(iii) The strength of interactions follows the order (DMF+MOH) +PA < (DMF+EOH)
+PA < (DMF+POH) +PA.
(iv) The strength of interactions is also studied with the variation of temperature.
(v) The experimental viscosity values are compared with the viscosity values obtained
from different empirical relations and these are in good agreement with the
experimental values.
258
References
[1] Fort R J and Moore W H, Trans. Faraday Soc., 61 (1965) 2102.
[2] Marcus Y, Introduction to Liquid State Chemistry, Wiley-Interscience: New York,
1977.
[3] Kumar D S, Sreekanth K and Rao D K, J. Mol. Liq., 136 (2007) 90.
[4] Ali A and Soghra H, Indian J. Phys., 76 (2002) 23.
[5] Giner B, Martin S, Artigas H, Lopez M C and Lafuente C, J. Phys. Chem. B., 30
(2006) 17683.
[6] Kinart C M, Kinart W J, Checinska-Majak D and Cwiklinska A, J. Mol. Liq., 109
(2004) 19.
[7] Iloukhani H, Zoorasna Z and Soleimani R, Phys. Chem. Liq., 43 (2005) 391.
[8] Rattan V K, Seema K and Tochigi K K, J. Chem. Eng. Data., 47 (2002) 1182.
[9] Horacio N S, Roque R, Franco D and Miguel K, Can. J. Chem., 53 (1975) 1258.
[10] Begona G, Fafael A and Jose M L, Can. J. Chem., 69 (1991) 369.
[11] Miguel K, Pedro W L, Sancho M A and Horacio S, Can. J. Chem., 49 (1971) 2605.
[12] Rama M P, Joan O and Brian M, Can. J. Chem., 63 (1985) 1024.
[13] Rama M P, Joan O and David C, J. Chem. Eng. Data., 30 (1985) 355.
[14] Paul W, Murray H and Rama M P, Can. J. Chem., 70 (1992) 2645.
[15] Ahmad G O, Nehzat S and Jahanbakhsh G, J. Chem. Eng Data. 53 (2008) 53.
[16] Manukonda G S, Ponneri V, Kasibhatta K S and Sakamuri S R B, Arabian J. Chem.,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.09.042.
[17] Gowrisankar M, Venkateswarlu P, Siva kumar K and Sivarambabu S, J. Ind. Eng.
Chem., 20(2) (2014) 405.
259
[18] Kharat S J and Nikam P S, J. Mol. Liq., 131-132 (2007) 81.
[19] Thirumaran S and Sudha S, J. Chem. Pharm. Res., 2(1) (2010) 327.
[20] Zarei H A, Mirhidari N and Zangeneh Z, J. Chem. Eng. Data., 54 (2009) 847.
[21] Vogel A I, Text book of Organic Chemistry. 5th edition (John Wiley): New York,
1989.
[22] Riddick J A, Burger W B and Sankano T K, Techniques in Chemistry Vol. II 4th
Edition (John Wiley), New York, 1986.
[23] Parker H C and Parker E W, J. Phys. Chem., 29 (1925) 130.
[24] Naidu P S and Prasad K R, Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys., 42 (2004) 512.
[25] Islam M R and Quadri S K, Thermochim. Acta., 115 (1987) 335.
[26] Tewari K, Patra C and Chakravortty V, Acoustics Lett., 19 (1995) 53.
[27] Reddy K C, Subramanyam S V and Bhimasenachar J, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 19 (1964)
559.
[28] Fort R J and Moore W R, Trans. Faraday Soc., 62 (1966) 1112.
[29] Redlich O and Kister A T, Ind. Eng. Chem., 40 (1948) 345.
[30] Gurnberg L and Nissan A H, Nature., 164 (1949) 799.
[31] Hind R K, Mc. Laughlin E and Ubbelohde A R, Trans. Faraday Soc., 56 (1960) 328.
[32] Katti P K and Chaudhari M M, J. Chem. Eng. Data., 9 (1964) 442.
[33] Heric E L and Brewer J C, J. Chem. Eng. Data., 12 (1967) 574.
[34] Prolongo M G, Masegosa R M, Hernandez-Fuentes I and Horta A, J. Phys. Chem.,
89 (1984) 2163.
[35] Eads C D, J. Phys. Chem. B., 104 (2000) 6653.
260
[36] Reichardt C, Solvents Effects in Organic Chemistry, 3rd ed. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
(2003)
[37] Nikam P S, Shirsat L N and Hasan M, J. Chem. Eng. Data., 43 (1998) 732.
[38] Pal A and Singh Y P, J. Chem. Eng. Data., 40 (1995) 818.
[39] Joshi S S, Aminabhavi T M, Balundgi R H and Shukla S S, J. Chem. Eng. Data., 35
(1990) 185.
[40] Chan G and Knapp H, J. Chem. Eng. Data., 40 (1995) 1001.
[41] Bhuiyan M M H and Uddin M H, J. Mol. Liq., 138 (2008) 139.
[42] Bhuiyan M M H, Ferdaush J and Uddin M H, J. Chem. Thermodyn., 39 (2007) 675.
[43] Akhter S, Bhuiyan M M H, Uddin M S, Sultana B, Nessa M and Saleh M A, Phys.
Chem. Liq., 37 (1999) 215.
[44] Marcheselli L, Marchetti A, Tagliazucchi M, Tassi L and Tosi G, J. Chem. Soc.,
Faraday Trans., 88 (1992) 3159.
[45] Saleh M A, Akhtar S, Nessa M, Uddin M S and Bhuiyan M M H, Phys. Chem. Liq.,
36 (1998) 53.
[46] Kumar H, Kumar B, Kumar A, Angmo T and Yadav S, J. Chem. Eng. Data., 54
(2009) 165.